pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.30236 · v1 · pith:TKSZ7RU6new · submitted 2026-05-28 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Signals from the early Universe: a comprehensive search for primordial features in Planck CMB datasets

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 05:43 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords primordial featuresCMB anisotropiesPlanck dataoscillatory signalslook-elsewhere effectBayesian model comparisonunbinned likelihood
0
0 comments X

The pith

No primordial oscillatory features in Planck CMB data reach global significance above 2.6 sigma after corrections.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper systematically compares phenomenological templates for oscillatory signals against Planck PR3 and PR4 CMB anisotropy measurements using unbinned likelihoods. Several frequencies improve the fit by up to 15 units in chi-squared, yet these gains fail to overcome the penalties from extra parameters in Bayesian comparisons and from the look-elsewhere effect. The analysis concludes that apparent structures are consistent with statistical fluctuations rather than genuine early-universe signals. Updated likelihoods also reduce some earlier anomalies. Forecasts indicate that polarization data from upcoming experiments will tighten amplitude limits by more than a factor of ten.

Core claim

The authors establish that a small set of frequencies between roughly 10 and 100 improves the fit to the data relative to the featureless model, but after correcting for the look-elsewhere effect the global significance reaches at most 2.6 sigma and the models incur an Occam penalty because three or four additional parameters reduce overall predictability; some previously reported anomalies weaken with the PR4 CamSpec likelihood.

What carries the argument

Phenomenological oscillatory templates fitted to Planck temperature and polarization maps through unbinned likelihoods, with explicit correction for the look-elsewhere effect.

If this is right

  • The improvement in fit from the preferred frequencies is not supported by Bayesian model comparison.
  • After the look-elsewhere correction the global statistical significance remains at most 2.6 sigma.
  • Some earlier anomalies diminish when the analysis is updated to the PR4 likelihood.
  • Polarization measurements from next-generation experiments will play the decisive role in separating real signals from fluctuations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The results imply that temperature data alone are insufficient to confirm or rule out oscillatory features at high .
  • Extending the same unbinned framework to specific inflation-model predictions could test whether any of the marginal frequencies match theoretical expectations.
  • If map-making or foreground residuals are larger than assumed, the effective number of trials may still be underestimated.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen templates are assumed to capture the full range of possible primordial oscillatory signals without residual bias from foreground modeling or map-making choices.

What would settle it

A future measurement from SO or LiteBIRD that detects an oscillatory amplitude exceeding the forecasted uncertainty range would indicate that the current upper limits are incomplete.

read the original abstract

We investigate the presence of primordial oscillatory features in measurements of CMB anisotropies through a systematic comparison of phenomenological templates. Building upon previous searches for primordial features using Planck data, we compare the full PR3 legacy release with the PR4 (NPIPE) processing to assess how the results depend on the choice of CMB maps and likelihood framework. To maximise our sensitivity to rapidly varying oscillatory signals, we employ unbinned likelihoods. We find that several previously reported indications of oscillatory structure persist across different analyses, although none attains global statistical significance. Furthermore, some anomalies reported in earlier studies are substantially reduced when updated to the new versions of the CamSpec likelihood using Planck PR4 products. For all templates considered, we identify a small number of frequencies in the range $\omega \sim 10-100$ that improve the fit to the CMB data by up to $\Delta\chi^2 \simeq -10$ to $-15$ relative to the featureless reference model. However, this improvement is not supported by a Bayesian model comparison. The inclusion of three or four additional parameters can reduces the overall predictability of the feature models and leads to an Occam penalty. Finally, after properly accounting for the look-elsewhere effect, the significance of the preferred frequencies is reduced, corresponding to a global statistical significance of at most $2.6\sigma$. We present forecasts for forthcoming CMB experiments, highlighting the decisive role of next-generation polarisation measurements in distinguishing genuine primordial oscillations from statistical fluctuations and modelling systematics. The upper bounds or uncertainties on the feature amplitudes, expected from the combination of SO and LiteBIRD, improve by more than one order of magnitude.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript conducts a systematic search for primordial oscillatory features in Planck PR3 and PR4 CMB anisotropy measurements. Using unbinned likelihoods and a suite of phenomenological templates, the authors identify local fit improvements of Δχ² ≈ −10 to −15 at certain frequencies (ω ∼ 10–100) across data releases and CamSpec likelihood versions. After applying a look-elsewhere correction, the global significance is stated to be at most 2.6σ; Bayesian model comparison yields an Occam penalty that disfavors the feature models. Forecasts for SO and LiteBIRD are presented, emphasizing the role of future polarization data.

Significance. If the statistical methodology is robust, the work supplies a valuable update to prior feature searches by cross-checking PR3/PR4 pipelines and explicitly treating the look-elsewhere effect and model evidence. The null result after correction, together with the forecasts, helps set expectations for next-generation constraints and underscores the diagnostic power of polarization. The multi-release comparison is a concrete strength for assessing processing systematics.

major comments (2)
  1. [Look-elsewhere correction section] Look-elsewhere correction section: The central claim of ≤2.6σ global significance rests on the unbinned likelihood plus trial-factor estimate correctly capturing the effective number of independent frequencies. The manuscript should demonstrate, via explicit simulation or covariance analysis, that residual correlations from NPIPE map-making or CamSpec foreground modeling do not inflate the effective trials factor beyond the quoted correction; otherwise the quoted significance may be overstated.
  2. [Bayesian model comparison section] Bayesian model comparison section: The statement that three or four additional parameters produce an Occam penalty is load-bearing for the conclusion that feature models are disfavored. Explicit Bayes factors or evidence ratios for the preferred frequencies (rather than a qualitative statement) are needed to quantify how strongly the data penalize the extended models relative to the featureless baseline.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the clause 'The inclusion of three or four additional parameters can reduces the overall predictability' contains a grammatical error.
  2. [Throughout] Figure captions and text should explicitly state the precise frequency ranges and template functional forms used for each reported Δχ² value to facilitate reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review and positive assessment of the manuscript. We address each major comment below and will revise the paper accordingly to strengthen the statistical claims.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Look-elsewhere correction section] Look-elsewhere correction section: The central claim of ≤2.6σ global significance rests on the unbinned likelihood plus trial-factor estimate correctly capturing the effective number of independent frequencies. The manuscript should demonstrate, via explicit simulation or covariance analysis, that residual correlations from NPIPE map-making or CamSpec foreground modeling do not inflate the effective trials factor beyond the quoted correction; otherwise the quoted significance may be overstated.

    Authors: We agree that explicit validation of the trials factor against residual correlations is a valuable addition. In the revised manuscript we will add Monte Carlo simulations based on NPIPE maps and the CamSpec likelihood pipeline to quantify any inflation of the effective number of independent frequencies due to map-making or foreground modeling correlations. This will directly support the quoted global significance of at most 2.6σ. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Bayesian model comparison section] Bayesian model comparison section: The statement that three or four additional parameters produce an Occam penalty is load-bearing for the conclusion that feature models are disfavored. Explicit Bayes factors or evidence ratios for the preferred frequencies (rather than a qualitative statement) are needed to quantify how strongly the data penalize the extended models relative to the featureless baseline.

    Authors: We accept that the Occam penalty argument would be stronger with quantitative evidence. In the revision we will compute and tabulate explicit Bayes factors (via nested sampling) for the frequencies that yield the largest local Δχ² improvements, reporting the evidence ratios relative to the baseline ΛCDM model. This will replace the current qualitative statement. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected in the empirical search

full rationale

The paper conducts a data-driven search for oscillatory features in external Planck PR3/PR4 CMB datasets using unbinned likelihoods, standard model comparison, and look-elsewhere corrections. All load-bearing steps (likelihood evaluation, Δχ² improvements, Occam penalty, global significance) operate on independent observational inputs and established statistical procedures rather than reducing by construction to fitted parameters or self-citation chains. No equations or claims equate a prediction to its own inputs, and the analysis remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The search rests on standard cosmological assumptions plus multiple free parameters in the oscillatory templates; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (3)
  • feature amplitude
    Amplitude of each oscillatory template is fitted to data for each tested frequency.
  • oscillation frequency ω
    Frequencies in range 10-100 are scanned as free parameters in the template fits.
  • number of templates tested
    Multiple phenomenological templates introduce additional parameters whose count affects the Occam penalty.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard ΛCDM background cosmology and linear perturbation theory hold for the CMB power spectrum.
    Invoked implicitly when using featureless reference model and templates on Planck data.
  • domain assumption The look-elsewhere effect correction accurately reflects the effective number of independent trials across the scanned frequency range.
    Used to downgrade local significances to global 2.6σ.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5832 in / 1561 out tokens · 36156 ms · 2026-06-29T05:43:12.486571+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Wedge-avoidance Fisher Forecasts for Primordial Non-Gaussianity from Dark-Ages 21-cm Power Spectrum and Bispectrum

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A wedge-aware Fisher framework is introduced to forecast PNG constraints from Dark Ages 21-cm power spectrum and bispectrum, demonstrating significantly weaker bounds due to mode loss in two oscillatory inflation models.

  2. Searching for primordial features with radio surveys: synergy between the power spectrum and bispectrum

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Joint power spectrum and bispectrum analysis from future HI intensity mapping surveys improves constraints on primordial feature amplitudes by 30-40% and achieves percent-level precision on oscillation frequencies whe...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 88 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 62 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Starobinsky,A new type of isotropic cosmological models without singularity,Physics Letters B91(1980) 99

    A.A. Starobinsky,A new type of isotropic cosmological models without singularity,Physics Letters B91(1980) 99

  2. [2]

    Guth,Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems, Phys

    A.H. Guth,Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems, Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 347

  3. [3]

    Linde,A new inflationary universe scenario: A possible solution of the horizon, flatness, homogeneity, isotropy and primordial monopole problems,Physics Letters B108(1982) 389

    A.D. Linde,A new inflationary universe scenario: A possible solution of the horizon, flatness, homogeneity, isotropy and primordial monopole problems,Physics Letters B108(1982) 389

  4. [4]

    Linde,Chaotic inflation,Physics Letters B129(1983) 177

    A.D. Linde,Chaotic inflation,Physics Letters B129(1983) 177

  5. [5]

    Mukhanov and G.V

    V.F. Mukhanov and G.V. Chibisov,Quantum fluctuations and a nonsingular universe,Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters33(1981) 532

  6. [6]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    Planck Collaboration: N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini et al.,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,A&A641(2020) A6 [1807.06209]

  7. [7]

    Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation

    Planck Collaboration: Y. Akrami, F. Arroja, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini et al.,Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,A&A641(2020) A10 [1807.06211]

  8. [8]

    Planck 2018 results. IX. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity

    Planck Collaboration: Y. Akrami, F. Arroja, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini et al.,Planck 2018 results. IX. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity,A&A 641(2020) A9 [1905.05697]

  9. [9]

    Handley, A.N

    W.J. Handley, A.N. Lasenby, H.V. Peiris and M.P. Hobson,Bayesian inflationary reconstructions from Planck 2018 data,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 103511 [1908.00906]

  10. [10]

    Raffaelli and M

    A. Raffaelli and M. Ballardini,Knot reconstruction of the scalar primordial power spectrum with Planck, ACT, and SPT CMB data,JCAP2025(2025) 077 [2503.10609]

  11. [11]

    Features and New Physical Scales in Primordial Observables: Theory and Observation

    J. Chluba, J. Hamann and S.P. Patil,Features and new physical scales in primordial observables: Theory and observation,International Journal of Modern Physics D24(2015) 1530023 [1505.01834]

  12. [12]

    Ach´ ucarro, M

    A. Ach´ ucarro, M. Biagetti, M. Braglia, G. Cabass, R. Caldwell, E. Castorina et al.,Inflation: Theory and Observations,arXiv e-prints(2022) arXiv:2203.08128 [2203.08128]

  13. [13]

    A.A. Starobinsky,Spectrum of adiabatic perturbations in the universe when there are singularities in the inflationary potential.,Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters55(1992) 489. – 38 –

  14. [14]

    Inflationary perturbations from a potential with a step

    J. Adams, B. Cresswell and R. Easther,Inflationary perturbations from a potential with a step, Phys. Rev. D64(2001) 123514 [astro-ph/0102236]

  15. [15]

    X. Chen, R. Easther and E.A. Lim,Large non-Gaussianities in single-field inflation,JCAP 2007(2007) 023 [astro-ph/0611645]

  16. [16]

    Probing Planckian physics: resonant production of particles during inflation and features in the primordial power spectrum

    D.J.H. Chung, E.W. Kolb, A. Riotto and I.I. Tkachev,Probing Planckian physics: Resonant production of particles during inflation and features in the primordial power spectrum,Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 043508 [hep-ph/9910437]

  17. [17]

    Effects of particle production during inflation

    A.E. Romano and M. Sasaki,Effects of particle production during inflation,Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 103522 [0809.5142]

  18. [18]

    Cosmological Fluctuations from Infra-Red Cascading During Inflation

    N. Barnaby, Z. Huang, L. Kofman and D. Pogosyan,Cosmological fluctuations from infrared cascading during inflation,Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 043501 [0902.0615]

  19. [19]

    X. Chen, R. Easther and E.A. Lim,Generation and characterization of large non-Gaussianities in single field inflation,JCAP2008(2008) 010 [0801.3295]

  20. [20]

    Oscillations in the CMB from Axion Monodromy Inflation

    R. Flauger, L. McAllister, E. Pajer, A. Westphal and G. Xu,Oscillations in the CMB from axion monodromy inflation,JCAP2010(2010) 009 [0907.2916]

  21. [21]

    Resonant Non-Gaussianity

    R. Flauger and E. Pajer,Resonant non-gaussianity,JCAP2011(2011) 017 [1002.0833]

  22. [22]

    Folded Resonant Non-Gaussianity in General Single Field Inflation

    X. Chen,Folded resonant non-Gaussianity in general single field inflation,JCAP2010(2010) 003 [1008.2485]

  23. [23]

    Features of heavy physics in the CMB power spectrum

    A. Ach´ ucarro, J.-O. Gong, S. Hardeman, G.A. Palma and S.P. Patil,Features of heavy physics in the CMB power spectrum,JCAP2011(2011) 030 [1010.3693]

  24. [24]

    Primordial Features as Evidence for Inflation

    X. Chen,Primordial Features as Evidence for Inflation,JCAP2012(2012) 038 [1104.1323]

  25. [25]

    First Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Implications for Inflation

    H.V. Peiris, E. Komatsu, L. Verde, D.N. Spergel, C.L. Bennett, M. Halpern et al.,First-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Implications For Inflation, ApJS148(2003) 213 [astro-ph/0302225]

  26. [26]

    Model-Independent Reconstruction of the Primordial Power Spectrum from WMAP Data

    P. Mukherjee and Y. Wang,Model-independent Reconstruction of the Primordial Power Spectrum from Wilkinson Microwave Anistropy Probe Data,ApJ599(2003) 1 [astro-ph/0303211]

  27. [27]

    L. Covi, J. Hamann, A. Melchiorri, A. Slosar and I. Sorbera,Inflation and WMAP three year data: Features are still present,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 083509 [astro-ph/0606452]

  28. [28]

    New Constraints on Oscillations in the Primordial Spectrum of Inflationary Perturbations

    J. Hamann, L. Covi, A. Melchiorri and A. Slosar,New constraints on oscillations in the primordial spectrum of inflationary perturbations,Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 023503 [astro-ph/0701380]

  29. [29]

    WMAP 7 Constraints on Oscillations in the Primordial Power Spectrum

    P.D. Meerburg, R.A.M.J. Wijers and J.P. van der Schaar,WMAP7 constraints on oscillations in the primordial power spectrum,MNRAS421(2012) 369 [1109.5264]

  30. [30]

    Planck Collaboration: P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, C. Armitage-Caplan, M. Arnaud, M. Ashdown, F. Atrio-Barandela et al.,Planck 2013 results. XXII. Constraints on inflation, A&A571(2014) A22 [1303.5082]

  31. [31]

    Planck Collaboration: P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, C. Armitage-Caplan, M. Arnaud, M. Ashdown, F. Atrio-Barandela et al.,Planck 2013 results. XXIV. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity,A&A571(2014) A24 [1303.5084]

  32. [32]

    Searching for Oscillations in the Primordial Power Spectrum: Constraints from Planck (Paper II)

    P.D. Meerburg, D.N. Spergel and B.D. Wandelt,Searching for oscillations in the primordial power spectrum. II. Constraints from Planck data,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 063537 [1308.3705]

  33. [33]

    Updating constraints on inflationary features in the primordial power spectrum with the Planck data

    M. Benetti,Updating constraints on inflationary features in the primordial power spectrum with the Planck data,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 087302 [1308.6406]. – 39 –

  34. [34]

    Inflationary Steps in the Planck Data

    V. Miranda and W. Hu,Inflationary steps in the Planck data,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 083529 [1312.0946]

  35. [35]

    Planck Constraints on Monodromy Inflation

    R. Easther and R. Flauger,Planck constraints on monodromy inflation,JCAP2014(2014) 037 [1308.3736]

  36. [36]

    Standard Clock in Primordial Density Perturbations and Cosmic Microwave Background

    X. Chen and M.H. Namjoo,Standard Clock in primordial density perturbations and cosmic microwave background,Physics Letters B739(2014) 285 [1404.1536]

  37. [37]

    Inflation with moderately sharp features in the speed of sound: GSR and in-in formalism for power spectrum and bispectrum

    A. Ach´ ucarro, V. Atal, B. Hu, P. Ortiz and J. Torrado,Inflation with moderately sharp features in the speed of sound: Generalized slow roll and in-in formalism for power spectrum and bispectrum,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 023511 [1404.7522]

  38. [38]

    Wiggly Whipped Inflation

    D.K. Hazra, A. Shafieloo, G.F. Smoot and A.A. Starobinsky,Wiggly whipped inflation,JCAP 2014(2014) 048 [1405.2012]

  39. [39]

    Primordial power spectrum from Planck

    D.K. Hazra, A. Shafieloo and T. Souradeep,Primordial power spectrum from Planck,JCAP 2014(2014) 011 [1406.4827]

  40. [40]

    Searching for primordial localized features with CMB and LSS spectra

    B. Hu and J. Torrado,Searching for primordial localized features with CMB and LSS spectra, Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 064039 [1410.4804]

  41. [41]

    Fergusson, H.F

    J.R. Fergusson, H.F. Gruetjen, E.P.S. Shellard and B. Wallisch,Polyspectra searches for sharp oscillatory features in cosmic microwave sky data,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 123506 [1412.6152]

  42. [42]

    Planck Collaboration: P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. Arnaud, F. Arroja, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont et al.,Planck 2015 results. XVII. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity,A&A 594(2016) A17 [1502.01592]

  43. [43]

    Planck Collaboration: P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. Arnaud, F. Arroja, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont et al.,Planck 2015 results. XX. Constraints on inflation,A&A594(2016) A20 [1502.02114]

  44. [44]

    Primordial features and Planck polarization

    D.K. Hazra, A. Shafieloo, G.F. Smoot and A.A. Starobinsky,Primordial features and Planck polarization,JCAP2016(2016) 009 [1605.02106]

  45. [45]

    Robust predictions for an oscillatory bispectrum in Planck 2015 data from transient reductions in the speed of sound of the inflaton

    J. Torrado, B. Hu and A. Ach´ ucarro,Robust predictions for an oscillatory bispectrum in Planck 2015 data from transient reductions in the speed of sound of the inflaton,Phys. Rev. D96 (2017) 083515 [1611.10350]

  46. [46]

    Searching for Oscillations in the Primordial Power Spectrum with CMB and LSS Data

    C. Zeng, E.D. Kovetz, X. Chen, Y. Gong, J.B. Mu˜ noz and M. Kamionkowski,Searching for oscillations in the primordial power spectrum with CMB and LSS data,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 043517 [1812.05105]

  47. [47]

    Ca˜ nas-Herrera, J

    G. Ca˜ nas-Herrera, J. Torrado and A. Ach´ ucarro,Bayesian reconstruction of the inflaton’s speed of sound using CMB data,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 123531 [2012.04640]

  48. [48]

    Braglia, X

    M. Braglia, X. Chen and D.K. Hazra,Comparing multi-field primordial feature models with the Planck data,JCAP2021(2021) 005 [2103.03025]

  49. [49]

    Braglia, X

    M. Braglia, X. Chen and D.K. Hazra,Uncovering the history of cosmic inflation from anomalies in cosmic microwave background spectra,European Physical Journal C82(2022) 498 [2106.07546]

  50. [50]

    Braglia, X

    M. Braglia, X. Chen and D.K. Hazra,Primordial standard clock models and CMB residual anomalies,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 103523 [2108.10110]

  51. [51]

    S.S. Naik, K. Furuuchi and P. Chingangbam,Particle production during inflation: a Bayesian analysis with CMB data from Planck 2018,JCAP2022(2022) 016 [2202.05862]

  52. [52]

    Hamann and J

    J. Hamann and J. Wons,Optimising inflationary features the Bayesian way,JCAP2022 (2022) 036 [2112.08571]. – 40 –

  53. [53]

    Antony, F

    A. Antony, F. Finelli, D.K. Hazra, D. Paoletti and A. Shafieloo,A search for super-imposed oscillations to the primordial power spectrum in Planck and SPT-3G 2018 data,JCAP2026 (2026) 029 [2403.19575]

  54. [54]

    Constraining inflation with future galaxy redshift surveys

    Z. Huang, L. Verde and F. Vernizzi,Constraining inflation with future galaxy redshift surveys, JCAP2012(2012) 005 [1201.5955]

  55. [55]

    X. Chen, C. Dvorkin, Z. Huang, M.H. Namjoo and L. Verde,The future of primordial features with large-scale structure surveys,JCAP2016(2016) 014 [1605.09365]

  56. [56]

    Probing primordial features with future galaxy surveys

    M. Ballardini, F. Finelli, C. Fedeli and L. Moscardini,Probing primordial features with future galaxy surveys,JCAP2016(2016) 041 [1606.03747]

  57. [57]

    Probing primordial features with next-generation photometric and radio surveys

    M. Ballardini, F. Finelli, R. Maartens and L. Moscardini,Probing primordial features with next-generation photometric and radio surveys,JCAP2018(2018) 044 [1712.07425]

  58. [58]

    Beutler, M

    F. Beutler, M. Biagetti, D. Green, A. Slosar and B. Wallisch,Primordial features from linear to nonlinear scales,Physical Review Research1(2019) 033209 [1906.08758]

  59. [59]

    Ballardini, R

    M. Ballardini, R. Murgia, M. Baldi, F. Finelli and M. Viel,Non-linear damping of superimposed primordial oscillations on the matter power spectrum in galaxy surveys,JCAP 2020(2020) 030 [1912.12499]

  60. [60]

    Ballardini, F

    M. Ballardini, F. Finelli, F. Marulli, L. Moscardini and A. Veropalumbo,New constraints on primordial features from the galaxy two-point correlation function,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 043532 [2202.08819]

  61. [61]

    Ballardini and F

    M. Ballardini and F. Finelli,On the primordial origin of the smoothing excess in the Planck temperature power spectrum in light of LSS data,JCAP2022(2022) 083 [2207.14410]

  62. [62]

    Mergulh˜ ao, F

    T. Mergulh˜ ao, F. Beutler and J.A. Peacock,Primordial feature constraints from BOSS + eBOSS,JCAP2023(2023) 012 [2303.13946]

  63. [63]

    Ballardini, Y

    Euclid Collaboration: M. Ballardini, Y. Akrami, F. Finelli, D. Karagiannis, B. Li, Y. Li et al., Euclid: The search for primordial features,A&A683(2024) A220 [2309.17287]

  64. [64]

    Calder´ on, T

    R. Calder´ on, T. Simon, A. Shafieloo and D.K. Hazra,Primordial features in light of the Effective Field Theory of Large-Scale Structure,JCAP2026(2026) 057 [2504.06183]

  65. [65]

    CMB polarization features from inflation versus reionization

    M.J. Mortonson, C. Dvorkin, H.V. Peiris and W. Hu,CMB polarization features from inflation versus reionization,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 103519 [0903.4920]

  66. [66]

    Exploring Cosmic Origins with CORE: Inflation

    F. Finelli, M. Bucher, A. Ach´ ucarro, M. Ballardini, N. Bartolo, D. Baumann et al.,Exploring cosmic origins with CORE: Inflation,JCAP2018(2018) 016 [1612.08270]

  67. [67]

    Probing features in inflaton potential and reionization history with future CMB space observations

    D.K. Hazra, D. Paoletti, M. Ballardini, F. Finelli, A. Shafieloo, G.F. Smoot et al.,Probing features in inflaton potential and reionization history with future CMB space observations, JCAP2018(2018) 017 [1710.01205]

  68. [68]

    Braglia, X

    M. Braglia, X. Chen, D. Kumar Hazra and L. Pinol,Back to the features: assessing the discriminating power of future CMB missions on inflationary models,JCAP2023(2023) 014 [2210.07028]

  69. [69]

    Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi et al., Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods,A&A641(2020) A5 [1907.12875]

  70. [70]

    Efstathiou and S

    G. Efstathiou and S. Gratton,A detailed description of the camspec likelihood pipeline and a reanalysis of the planck high frequency maps,The Open Journal of Astrophysics4(2021)

  71. [71]

    CMB power spectra and cosmological parameters from Planck PR4 with CamSpec

    E. Rosenberg, S. Gratton and G. Efstathiou,CMB power spectra and cosmological parameters from Planck PR4 with CamSpec,MNRAS517(2022) 4620 [2205.10869]

  72. [72]

    Akrami, K.J

    Planck Collaboration, Y. Akrami, K.J. Andersen, M. Ashdown, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini et al.,Planck intermediate results. LVII. Joint Planck LFI and HFI data processing,A&A643 (2020) A42 [2007.04997]. – 41 –

  73. [73]

    P. Ade, J. Aguirre, Z. Ahmed, S. Aiola, A. Ali, D. Alonso et al.,The Simons Observatory: science goals and forecasts, Feb., 2019. 10.1088/1475-7516/2019/02/056

  74. [74]

    Probing cosmic inflation with the litebird cosmic microwave background polarization survey,

    LiteBIRD Collaboration, E. Allys, K. Arnold, J. Aumont, R. Aurlien, S. Azzoni et al.,Probing cosmic inflation with the LiteBIRD cosmic microwave background polarization survey,Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics2023(2023) 042F01 [2202.02773]

  75. [75]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Power Spectra, Likelihoods and $\Lambda$CDM Parameters

    T. Louis, A. La Posta, Z. Atkins, H.T. Jense, I. Abril-Cabezas, G.E. Addison et al.,The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 power spectra, likelihoods andΛCDM parameters,JCAP 2025(2025) 062 [2503.14452]

  76. [76]

    SPT-3G D1: CMB temperature and polarization power spectra and cosmology from 2019 and 2020 observations of the SPT-3G Main field

    E. Camphuis, W. Quan, L. Balkenhol, A.R. Khalife, F. Ge, F. Guidi et al.,SPT-3G D1: CMB temperature and polarization power spectra and cosmology from 2019 and 2020 observations of the SPT-3G main field,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 083504 [2506.20707]

  77. [77]

    X. Gao, D. Langlois and S. Mizuno,Influence of heavy modes on perturbations in multiple field inflation,JCAP2012(2012) 040 [1205.5275]

  78. [78]

    Models of the Primordial Standard Clock

    X. Chen, M.H. Namjoo and Y. Wang,Models of the Primordial Standard Clock,JCAP2015 (2015) 027 [1411.2349]

  79. [79]

    Gravity Waves and Linear Inflation from Axion Monodromy

    L. McAllister, E. Silverstein and A. Westphal,Gravity waves and linear inflation from axion monodromy,Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 046003 [0808.0706]

  80. [80]

    R. Bean, X. Chen, G. Hailu, S.H.H. Tye and J. Xu,Duality cascade in brane inflation,JCAP 2008(2008) 026 [0802.0491]

Showing first 80 references.