Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 1 minor 69 references

Augmented Correlation Functions for Spectroscopic Galaxy Surveys

T0 review · 1 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-06-29 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The augmented correlation function extracts more cosmological information from galaxy redshift surveys than standard two-point statistics by incorporating latent dimensions from field transformations.

desk verdict Augmented correlations add a clean latent dimension to two-point stats, but Fisher forecasts on Quijote halos do not yet support the claim of tighter constraints. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.30305 v1 pith:2Z37FM4R submitted 2026-05-28 astro-ph.CO

Davide Bianchi This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.CO
keywords augmentedcorrelationfunctiongalaxyclusteringtwo-pointstatisticsFisherforecastsredshift-spacedistortionscosmologicalconstraints
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces the augmented correlation function as a way to extend standard two-point clustering measurements with additional latent dimensions defined by arbitrary transformations of the galaxy density field. This framework aims to capture clustering details, such as those distinguishing infalling and outflowing galaxy pairs, that are averaged out in conventional analyses. As a demonstration, a specific latent variable based on the pairwise gradient of the inverse Laplacian is used, and Fisher matrix forecasts on simulated halo catalogs at redshift one show improved constraints on cosmological parameters in a neutrino-extended Lambda CDM model. A reader would care because current and future spectroscopic surveys generate large datasets where extracting every bit of information matters for precision cosmology.

What carries the argument

The augmented correlation function, which extends the two-point correlation function by adding latent dimensions from transformations of the galaxy field to isolate otherwise averaged clustering properties.

What would settle it

Running the same analysis on mock catalogs that include additional effects like survey geometry, incompleteness, or more realistic galaxy formation models and checking if the constraint improvements persist would test the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The augmented correlation function is a general framework in which an arbitrary transformation of the galaxy field defines additional latent dimensions that extend the standard two-point correlation function and isolate clustering properties averaged out in conventional analyses. In a proof-of-concept application using the pairwise gradient of the inverse Laplacian of the galaxy density field, this statistic distinguishes clustering regimes associated with infalling and outflowing pairs. Fisher forecasts based on z=1 halo catalogues from the Quijote simulations within νΛCDM cosmology show that the augmented correlation systematically yields tighter constraints on all cosmological parameters

Load-bearing premise

Fisher forecasts applied to halo catalogues from the Quijote simulations accurately reflect the true information gain from the augmented correlation function.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The augmented correlation yields tighter constraints on cosmological parameters in νΛCDM models.
  • The specific implementation distinguishes infalling and outflowing pair clustering regimes.
  • It serves as a flexible and computationally efficient alternative to standard two-point statistics for spectroscopic surveys.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Applying the framework to real survey data could reveal whether the forecasted gains translate to actual observations.
  • Other transformations of the density field might isolate different physical effects like bias or redshift-space distortions.
  • Combining multiple latent variables could further increase the information content beyond the single example tested.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper introduces the augmented correlation function as a framework that extends the standard two-point correlation function by incorporating arbitrary transformations of the galaxy field as additional 'latent' dimensions. As a proof of concept, it constructs a latent variable from the pairwise gradient of the inverse Laplacian of the galaxy density field and applies Fisher forecasts to z=1 halo catalogs from the Quijote simulations in νΛCDM cosmology, reporting systematically tighter constraints on all cosmological parameters considered. The abstract qualifies these improvements as indicative due to the exploratory nature of the analysis.

Significance. If validated beyond Fisher forecasts, the framework could offer a computationally efficient way to isolate additional clustering information from spectroscopic surveys that is averaged out in conventional analyses. The current results, however, rest entirely on unvalidated Fisher matrices for a higher-dimensional statistic, limiting their immediate impact.

major comments (1)
  1. [Fisher analysis / abstract] Fisher forecast section (implicit in abstract and methods): The headline claim of tighter constraints on all parameters relies on Fisher matrices for the augmented data vector, but the manuscript does not verify the Gaussian likelihood assumption for this higher-dimensional statistic (including the latent gradient field) nor demonstrate that the covariance estimated from the finite Quijote suite remains invertible and unbiased. This directly undermines the reported information gain, as noted by the paper's own caveats on the exploratory character of both Fisher methods and simulations.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Methods] Clarify the precise definition and normalization of the latent variable (pairwise gradient of inverse Laplacian) in the methods section to ensure reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments. We address the single major comment below, agreeing where the observation is accurate while noting the manuscript's existing qualifications.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Fisher analysis / abstract] Fisher forecast section (implicit in abstract and methods): The headline claim of tighter constraints on all parameters relies on Fisher matrices for the augmented data vector, but the manuscript does not verify the Gaussian likelihood assumption for this higher-dimensional statistic (including the latent gradient field) nor demonstrate that the covariance estimated from the finite Quijote suite remains invertible and unbiased. This directly undermines the reported information gain, as noted by the paper's own caveats on the exploratory character of both Fisher methods and simulations.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript does not provide explicit verification of the Gaussian likelihood assumption for the augmented statistic or additional checks on covariance invertibility and bias beyond the standard Quijote analysis pipeline. The analysis is presented as exploratory, and the abstract already qualifies the reported improvements as indicative owing to the limitations of Fisher forecasts and simulations. We do not claim the results are validated but rather illustrate the framework's potential. To address the point, we will add a short paragraph in the methods section discussing the standard assumptions of the Fisher approach in this context and reiterating the exploratory nature. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: new statistic defined independently and validated via external simulations

full rationale

The derivation introduces the augmented correlation function via an explicit transformation (pairwise gradient of inverse Laplacian) applied to the galaxy density field; this definition does not reference the target cosmological parameters or the Fisher results. The claim of tighter constraints is obtained by applying standard Fisher forecasts to external Quijote halo catalogues, which constitute an independent numerical experiment rather than a fit or self-referential prediction. No self-citations, ansatzes smuggled via prior work, or renamings of known results appear as load-bearing steps. The chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 1 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the central claim rests on the validity of Fisher forecasts as proxies for information content and on the simulations capturing the relevant nonlinear regimes. The latent variable is introduced without external validation.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Fisher matrix forecasts accurately indicate the improvement in cosmological parameter constraints from the new statistic
    Invoked to support the claim of tighter constraints on all parameters considered.
invented entities (1)
  • latent variable from pairwise gradient of the inverse Laplacian of the galaxy density field
    purpose: To extend the correlation function and distinguish infalling versus outflowing pair regimes
    Introduced as a proof-of-concept transformation without independent evidence of its optimality or generality outside the abstract.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Augmented Correlation Functions for Spectroscopic Galaxy Surveys." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2Z37FM4R

@misc{pith2026260530305,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Augmented Correlation Functions for Spectroscopic Galaxy Surveys},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2Z37FM4R}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.30305}
}
abstract

Galaxy redshift surveys encode a wealth of information generated by nonlinear gravitational evolution, galaxy bias, and redshift-space distortions, only part of which is accessible through standard two-point statistics. Motivated by the need for flexible and computationally efficient alternatives, we introduce the augmented correlation function, a general framework in which an arbitrary transformation of the galaxy field defines additional ``latent'' dimensions that extend the standard two-point correlation function and isolate clustering properties averaged out in conventional analyses. As a proof of concept, we study a latent variable constructed from the pairwise gradient of the inverse Laplacian of the galaxy density field, showing that the resulting statistics naturally distinguish clustering regimes associated with infalling and outflowing pairs. Using Fisher forecasts based on $z=1$ halo catalogues from the Quijote simulations within $\nu\Lambda\mathrm{CDM}$ cosmology, we find that the augmented correlation systematically yields tighter constraints on all cosmological parameters considered. Although these improvements should be regarded as indicative given the exploratory nature of the analysis and the limitations of Fisher forecasts and simulations, our results demonstrate the potential of augmented correlations as a flexible framework for extracting additional information from spectroscopic galaxy surveys.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The gravitational lensing imprints of DES Y3 superstructures on the CMB: a matched filtering approach

    DESI Collaboration, A. Aghamousa, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, L.E. Allen et al.,The DESI Experiment Part I: Science,Targeting, and Survey Design,arXiv e-prints(2016) arXiv:1611.00036 [1611.00036]. – 24 –

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  2. [2]

    The DESI Experiment Part II: Instrument Design

    DESI Collaboration, A. Aghamousa, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, L.E. Allen et al.,The DESI Experiment Part II: Instrument Design,arXiv e-prints(2016) arXiv:1611.00037 [1611.00037]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  3. [3]

    Euclid. I. Overview of the Euclid mission

    Euclid Collaboration, Y. Mellier, Abdurro’uf, J.A. Acevedo Barroso, A. Ach´ ucarro, J. Adamek et al.,Euclid: I. Overview of the Euclid mission, A&A697(2025) A1 [2405.13491]

    work page arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: RSD measurement from the power spectrum and bispectrum of the DR12 BOSS galaxies

    H. Gil-Mar´ ın, W.J. Percival, L. Verde, J.R. Brownstein, C.-H. Chuang, F.-S. Kitaura et al., The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: RSD measurement from the power spectrum and bispectrum of the DR12 BOSS galaxies, MNRAS 465(2017) 1757 [1606.00439]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  5. [5]

    Detection of Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Features in the Large-Scale 3-Point Correlation Function of SDSS BOSS DR12 CMASS Galaxies

    Z. Slepian, D.J. Eisenstein, J.R. Brownstein, C.-H. Chuang, H. Gil-Mar´ ın, S. Ho et al., Detection of baryon acoustic oscillation features in the large-scale three-point correlation function of SDSS BOSS DR12 CMASS galaxies, MNRAS469(2017) 1738 [1607.06097]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  6. [6]

    J. Hou, Z. Slepian and R.N. Cahn,Measurement of parity-odd modes in the large-scale 4-point correlation function of Sloan Digital Sky Survey Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey twelfth data release CMASS and LOWZ galaxies, MNRAS522(2023) 5701 [2206.03625]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    Ivanov, O.H.E

    M.M. Ivanov, O.H.E. Philcox, G. Cabass, T. Nishimichi, M. Simonovi´ c and M. Zaldarriaga, Cosmology with the galaxy bispectrum multipoles: Optimal estimation and application to BOSS data, Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 083515 [2302.04414]

    work page arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    D’Amico, Y

    G. D’Amico, Y. Donath, M. Lewandowski, L. Senatore and P. Zhang,The BOSS bispectrum analysis at one loop from the Effective Field Theory of Large-Scale Structure, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2024(2024) 059 [2206.08327]

    work page arXiv 2024

Show all 69 references
  1. [9]

    Novell-Masot, H

    S. Novell-Masot, H. Gil-Mar´ ın, L. Verde, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Bailey et al.,Full-Shape analysis of the power spectrum and bispectrum of DESI DR1 LRG and QSO samples, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2025(2025) 005 [2503.09714]

    2025

  2. [10]

    Chudaykin, M.M

    A. Chudaykin, M.M. Ivanov and O.H.E. Philcox,Reanalyzing DESI DR1: 1. LambdaCDM Constraints from the Power Spectrum and Bispectrum,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2507.13433 [2507.13433]

    2025

  3. [11]

    Nishimichi, M

    T. Nishimichi, M. Takada, R. Takahashi, K. Osato, M. Shirasaki, T. Oogi et al.,Dark Quest. I. Fast and Accurate Emulation of Halo Clustering Statistics and Its Application to Galaxy Clustering, ApJ884(2019) 29 [1811.09504]

    2019

  4. [12]

    C. Hahn, M. Eickenberg, S. Ho, J. Hou, P. Lemos, E. Massara et al.,A forward modeling approach to analyzing galaxy clustering with SIMBIG,Proceedings of the National Academy of Science120(2023) e2218810120

    2023

  5. [13]

    Cuesta-Lazaro, E

    C. Cuesta-Lazaro, E. Paillas, S. Yuan, Y.-C. Cai, S. Nadathur, W.J. Percival et al.,SUNBIRD: a simulation-based model for full-shape density-split clustering, MNRAS531(2024) 3336 [2309.16539]

    2024

  6. [14]

    S´ aez-Casares, Y

    I. S´ aez-Casares, Y. Rasera and B. Li,The e-MANTIS emulator: fast predictions of the non-linear matter power spectrum in f(R)CDM cosmology, MNRAS527(2024) 7242 [2303.08899]

    2024

  7. [15]

    Mallat,Group invariant scattering,Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics65 (2012) 1331 [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/cpa.21413]

    S. Mallat,Group invariant scattering,Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics65 (2012) 1331 [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/cpa.21413]

    2012 doi

  8. [16]

    Valogiannis and C

    G. Valogiannis and C. Dvorkin,Towards an optimal estimation of cosmological parameters with the wavelet scattering transform, Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 103534 [2108.07821]

    2022

  9. [17]

    Valogiannis, S

    G. Valogiannis, S. Yuan and C. Dvorkin,Precise cosmological constraints from BOSS galaxy clustering with a simulation-based emulator of the wavelet scattering transform, Phys. Rev. D 109(2024) 103503 [2310.16116]. – 25 –

    2024

  10. [18]

    R´ egaldo-Saint Blancard, C

    B. R´ egaldo-Saint Blancard, C. Hahn, S. Ho, J. Hou, P. Lemos, E. Massara et al.,Galaxy clustering analysis with SimBIG and the wavelet scattering transform, Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 083535 [2310.15250]

    2024

  11. [19]

    Mecke, T

    K.R. Mecke, T. Buchert and H. Wagner,Robust morphological measures for large-scale structure in the Universe, A&A288(1994) 697 [astro-ph/9312028]

    1994 arXiv

  12. [20]

    W. Fang, B. Li and G.-B. Zhao,New Probe of Departures from General Relativity Using Minkowski Functionals, Phys. Rev. Lett.118(2017) 181301 [1704.02325]

    2017 arXiv

  13. [21]

    W. Liu, A. Jiang and W. Fang,Probing massive neutrinos with the Minkowski functionals of large-scale structure, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2022(2022) 045 [2204.02945]

    2022

  14. [22]

    Jiang, W

    A. Jiang, W. Liu, W. Fang, B. Li, C. Barrera-Hinojosa and Y. Zhang,Minkowski functionals of large-scale structure as a probe of modified gravity, Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 083537 [2305.04520]

    2024

  15. [23]

    Banerjee and T

    A. Banerjee and T. Abel,Nearest neighbour distributions: New statistical measures for cosmological clustering, MNRAS500(2021) 5479 [2007.13342]

    2021

  16. [24]

    S. Yuan, A. Zamora and T. Abel,2D k-th nearest neighbour statistics: a highly informative probe of galaxy clustering, MNRAS522(2023) 3935 [2304.10565]

    2023

  17. [25]

    Barrow, S.P

    J.D. Barrow, S.P. Bhavsar and D.H. Sonoda,Minimal spanning trees, filaments and galaxy clustering, MNRAS216(1985) 17

    1985

  18. [26]

    Alpaslan, A.S.G

    M. Alpaslan, A.S.G. Robotham, S. Driver, P. Norberg, I. Baldry, A.E. Bauer et al.,Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): the large-scale structure of galaxies and comparison to mock universes, MNRAS438(2014) 177 [1311.1211]

    2014 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Naidoo, L

    K. Naidoo, L. Whiteway, E. Massara, D. Gualdi, O. Lahav, M. Viel et al.,Beyond two-point statistics: using the minimum spanning tree as a tool for cosmology, MNRAS491(2020) 1709 [1907.00989]

    2020

  20. [28]

    Naidoo, E

    K. Naidoo, E. Massara and O. Lahav,Cosmology and neutrino mass with the minimum spanning tree, MNRAS513(2022) 3596 [2111.12088]

    2022

  21. [29]

    Kaiser,Clustering in real space and in redshift space, MNRAS227(1987) 1

    N. Kaiser,Clustering in real space and in redshift space, MNRAS227(1987) 1

    1987

  22. [30]

    Alcock and B

    C. Alcock and B. Paczynski,An evolution free test for non-zero cosmological constant, Nature 281(1979) 358

    1979

  23. [31]

    Lavaux and B.D

    G. Lavaux and B.D. Wandelt,Precision Cosmography with Stacked Voids, ApJ754(2012) 109 [1110.0345]

    2012 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Hamaus, B.D

    N. Hamaus, B.D. Wandelt, P.M. Sutter, G. Lavaux and M.S. Warren,Cosmology with Void-Galaxy Correlations, Phys. Rev. Lett.112(2014) 041304 [1307.2571]

    2014 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Y.-C. Cai, A. Taylor, J.A. Peacock and N. Padilla,Redshift-space distortions around voids, MNRAS462(2016) 2465 [1603.05184]

    2016 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Nadathur, P.M

    S. Nadathur, P.M. Carter, W.J. Percival, H.A. Winther and J.E. Bautista,Beyond BAO: Improving cosmological constraints from BOSS data with measurement of the void-galaxy cross-correlation, Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 023504 [1904.01030]

    2019 arXiv

  27. [35]

    C. Zhao, A. Variu, M. He, D. Forero-S´ anchez, A. Tamone, C.-H. Chuang et al.,The completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological implications from multitracer BAO analysis with galaxies and voids, MNRAS511(2022) 5492 [2110.03824]

    2022

  28. [36]

    Abbas and R.K

    U. Abbas and R.K. Sheth,The environmental dependence of galaxy clustering in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, MNRAS372(2006) 1749 [astro-ph/0601407]

    2006 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Paillas, Y.-C

    E. Paillas, Y.-C. Cai, N. Padilla and A.G. S´ anchez,Redshift-space distortions with split densities, MNRAS505(2021) 5731 [2101.09854]. – 26 –

    2021

  30. [38]

    Paillas, C

    E. Paillas, C. Cuesta-Lazaro, P. Zarrouk, Y.-C. Cai, W.J. Percival, S. Nadathur et al., ConstrainingνΛCDM with density-split clustering, MNRAS522(2023) 606 [2209.04310]

    2023

  31. [39]

    Paillas, C

    E. Paillas, C. Cuesta-Lazaro, W.J. Percival, S. Nadathur, Y.-C. Cai, S. Yuan et al., Cosmological constraints from density-split clustering in the BOSS CMASS galaxy sample, MNRAS531(2024) 898 [2309.16541]

    2024

  32. [40]

    White,A marked correlation function for constraining modified gravity models, J

    M. White,A marked correlation function for constraining modified gravity models, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2016(2016) 057 [1609.08632]

    2016 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Armijo, Y.-C

    J. Armijo, Y.-C. Cai, N. Padilla, B. Li and J.A. Peacock,Testing modified gravity using a marked correlation function, MNRAS478(2018) 3627 [1801.08975]

    2018 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Hern´ andez-Aguayo, C.M

    C. Hern´ andez-Aguayo, C.M. Baugh and B. Li,Marked clustering statistics in f(R) gravity cosmologies, MNRAS479(2018) 4824 [1801.08880]

    2018 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Aviles, K

    A. Aviles, K. Koyama, J.L. Cervantes-Cota, H.A. Winther and B. Li,Marked correlation functions in perturbation theory, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2020(2020) 006 [1911.06362]

    2020

  36. [44]

    Massara, F

    E. Massara, F. Villaescusa-Navarro, S. Ho, N. Dalal and D.N. Spergel,Using the Marked Power Spectrum to Detect the Signature of Neutrinos in Large-Scale Structure, Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 011301 [2001.11024]

    2021

  37. [45]

    K¨ archer, J

    M. K¨ archer, J. Bel and S. de la Torre,Towards an optimal marked correlation function analysis for the detection of modified gravity, A&A694(2025) A253 [2406.02504]

    2025

  38. [46]

    Eisenstein, H.-J

    D.J. Eisenstein, H.-J. Seo, E. Sirko and D.N. Spergel,Improving Cosmological Distance Measurements by Reconstruction of the Baryon Acoustic Peak, ApJ664(2007) 675 [astro-ph/0604362]

    2007 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Wang, G.-B

    Y. Wang, G.-B. Zhao, K. Koyama, W.J. Percival, R. Takahashi, C. Hikage et al.,Extracting high-order cosmological information in galaxy surveys with power spectra,Communications Physics7(2024) 130 [2202.05248]

    2024

  40. [48]

    Y. Wang, R. Zhao, Z. Zhai, K. Koyama, W.J. Percival, H. Guo et al.,Emulating power spectra for pre- and post-reconstructed galaxy samples,arXiv e-prints(2023) arXiv:2311.05848 [2311.05848]

    2023

  41. [49]

    Landy and A.S

    S.D. Landy and A.S. Szalay,Bias and Variance of Angular Correlation Functions, ApJ412 (1993) 64

    1993

  42. [50]

    Nusser and M

    A. Nusser and M. Davis,On the Prediction of Velocity Fields from Redshift Space Galaxy Samples, ApJ421(1994) L1 [astro-ph/9309009]

    1994 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Padmanabhan, X

    N. Padmanabhan, X. Xu, D.J. Eisenstein, R. Scalzo, A.J. Cuesta, K.T. Mehta et al.,A 2 per cent distance to z = 0.35 by reconstructing baryon acoustic oscillations - I. Methods and application to the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, MNRAS427(2012) 2132 [1202.0090]

    2012 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Tully, E

    R.B. Tully, E. Kourkchi, H.M. Courtois, G.S. Anand, J.P. Blakeslee, D. Brout et al., Cosmicflows-4, ApJ944(2023) 94 [2209.11238]

    2023

  45. [53]

    Saulder, C

    C. Saulder, C. Howlett, K.A. Douglass, K. Said, S. BenZvi, S. Ahlen et al.,Target selection for the DESI Peculiar Velocity Survey, MNRAS525(2023) 1106 [2302.13760]

    2023

  46. [54]

    Fisher,The logic of inductive inference,Journal of the Royal Statistical Society98(1935) 39

    R.A. Fisher,The logic of inductive inference,Journal of the Royal Statistical Society98(1935) 39

    1935

  47. [55]

    Tegmark,Measuring Cosmological Parameters with Galaxy Surveys, Phys

    M. Tegmark,Measuring Cosmological Parameters with Galaxy Surveys, Phys. Rev. Lett.79 (1997) 3806 [astro-ph/9706198]

    1997 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Tegmark, A.N

    M. Tegmark, A.N. Taylor and A.F. Heavens,Karhunen-Lo` eve Eigenvalue Problems in Cosmology: How Should We Tackle Large Data Sets?, ApJ480(1997) 22 [astro-ph/9603021]

    1997 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Carron,On the assumption of Gaussianity for cosmological two-point statistics and parameter dependent covariance matrices, A&A551(2013) A88 [1204.4724]

    J. Carron,On the assumption of Gaussianity for cosmological two-point statistics and parameter dependent covariance matrices, A&A551(2013) A88 [1204.4724]. – 27 –

    2013 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Berlind and D.H

    A.A. Berlind and D.H. Weinberg,The Halo Occupation Distribution: Toward an Empirical Determination of the Relation between Galaxies and Mass, ApJ575(2002) 587 [astro-ph/0109001]

    2002 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Villaescusa-Navarro, C

    F. Villaescusa-Navarro, C. Hahn, E. Massara, A. Banerjee, A.M. Delgado, D.K. Ramanah et al.,The Quijote Simulations, ApJS250(2020) 2 [1909.05273]

    2020

  52. [60]

    Springel,The cosmological simulation code GADGET-2, MNRAS364(2005) 1105 [astro-ph/0505010]

    V. Springel,The cosmological simulation code GADGET-2, MNRAS364(2005) 1105 [astro-ph/0505010]

    2005 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Davis, G

    M. Davis, G. Efstathiou, C.S. Frenk and S.D.M. White,The evolution of large-scale structure in a universe dominated by cold dark matter, ApJ292(1985) 371

    1985

  54. [62]

    Sefusatti, M

    E. Sefusatti, M. Crocce, R. Scoccimarro and H.M.P. Couchman,Accurate estimators of correlation functions in Fourier space, MNRAS460(2016) 3624 [1512.07295]

    2016 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Jing,Correcting for the Alias Effect When Measuring the Power Spectrum Using a Fast Fourier Transform, ApJ620(2005) 559 [astro-ph/0409240]

    Y.P. Jing,Correcting for the Alias Effect When Measuring the Power Spectrum Using a Fast Fourier Transform, ApJ620(2005) 559 [astro-ph/0409240]

    2005 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Scoccimarro,Redshift-space distortions, pairwise velocities, and nonlinearities, Phys

    R. Scoccimarro,Redshift-space distortions, pairwise velocities, and nonlinearities, Phys. Rev. D 70(2004) 083007 [astro-ph/0407214]

    2004 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Bianchi, M

    D. Bianchi, M. Chiesa and L. Guzzo,Improving the modelling of redshift-space distortions - I. A bivariate Gaussian description for the galaxy pairwise velocity distributions, MNRAS446 (2015) 75 [1407.4753]

    2015 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Bianchi, W.J

    D. Bianchi, W.J. Percival and J. Bel,Improving the modelling of redshift-space distortions- II. A pairwise velocity model covering large and small scales, MNRAS463(2016) 3783 [1602.02780]

    2016 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Neyrinck, I

    M.C. Neyrinck, I. Szapudi, N. McCullagh, A.S. Szalay, B. Falck and J. Wang, Density-dependent clustering - I. Pullingback the curtains on motions of the BAO peak, MNRAS478(2018) 2495 [1610.06215]

    2018 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Schmittfull, Y

    M. Schmittfull, Y. Feng, F. Beutler, B. Sherwin and M.Y. Chu,Eulerian BAO reconstructions and N -point statistics, Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 123522 [1508.06972]

    2015 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Hikage, K

    C. Hikage, K. Koyama and R. Takahashi,Perturbation theory for the redshift-space matter power spectra after reconstruction, Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 043510 [1911.06461]. – 28 –

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed June 29, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.