pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.30575 · v1 · pith:HLW56PNLnew · submitted 2026-05-28 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.mes-hall

Observation and Control of the Magnetic Photogalvanic Effect from Strongly Bound Excitons

Xianfan Nie , Tarun Patel , Hyunggeun Lee , Chuangtang Wang , Meixin Cheng , Mingrui Lai , Bowen Yang , Matteo Pennacchietti
show 6 more authors
Shiyu Liu Hechang Lei Liuyan Zhao Michael E. Reimer Su Ying Quek Adam W. Tsen
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 06:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords magnetic photogalvanic effectbilayer CrI3strongly bound excitonstunnel junctionphotocurrentinterlayer symmetry2D magnetsoptoelectronics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Bilayer CrI3 tunnel junctions produce magnetic photogalvanic currents peaked at exciton resonances and switched by magnetic fields.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that a magnetic photogalvanic effect arises in bilayer CrI3 from spin-dependent symmetry breaking and is enhanced by resonant excitation of strongly bound excitons. The authors realize this in a tunnel junction device where an external magnetic field switches the current by altering interlayer magnetic order and an electric field tunes the symmetry. Polarization and energy control of the light separates shift and injection contributions, showing the largest signal when light energy matches the exciton transitions. If this holds, it supplies a route to magnetic control of photocurrents and sub-gap detection in two-dimensional magnets without requiring a built-in electric field.

Core claim

In bilayer CrI3 tunnel junctions the magnetic photogalvanic effect generates photocurrents that can be switched by magnetic field and tuned by electric field, with the peak magnitude occurring under resonant excitation of the material's strongly bound excitons.

What carries the argument

Interlayer symmetry breaking in bilayer CrI3, controlled jointly by magnetic order and applied electric field, that couples to resonant exciton states to drive the photogalvanic current.

If this is right

  • The devices operate as tunable multispectral detectors that respond to light helicity and polarization.
  • A many-body description accounts for the observed photogalvanic response.
  • The same symmetry-control approach extends to other two-dimensional magnets for optoelectronic use.
  • Electric-field tuning of interlayer symmetry provides an additional handle on the current magnitude.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar exciton-enhanced photogalvanic currents may appear in other layered magnetic materials once interlayer symmetry can be broken.
  • The resonance condition suggests a route to sub-gap photodetection that does not rely on conventional band-edge absorption.
  • Integration with existing 2D-magnet device stacks could allow simultaneous magnetic and optical readout in a single junction.

Load-bearing premise

The measured photocurrent is produced by the spin-dependent photogalvanic mechanism tied to exciton states rather than by heating or ordinary photovoltaic action at the contacts.

What would settle it

Absence of magnetic-field switching of the photocurrent, or loss of the resonance peak when illumination energy is detuned from the exciton transitions, would falsify the claimed origin.

read the original abstract

Photogalvanic effects arising from the quantum geometry of noncentrosymmetric materials are promising for next-generation light-harvesting devices that do not require a built-in electric field. Recent theories predict photogalvanic currents generated in magnetic systems with spin-dependent symmetry breaking as well as by bound exciton states, allowing for potential magnetic field control of the photoresponse and enhanced detection of deep sub-gap signals, respectively. We demonstrate the magnetic photogalvanic effect in a bilayer CrI3 tunnel junction with both magnetic field switching and electric field tuning of interlayer symmetry. By controlling for the polarization and energy of light illumination, we disentangle the shift and injection current contributions and find that the peak response occurs under resonant excitation of strongly bound excitons in CrI3. Our results can be captured within a many-body framework of the photogalvanic effect, while our devices function as tunable, multispectral helicity- and polarization-sensitive detectors that highlight the potential of 2D magnets for future optoelectronic applications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports experimental observation of the magnetic photogalvanic effect in a bilayer CrI3 tunnel junction device. Magnetic field is used to switch the photocurrent and electric field tunes the interlayer symmetry. Polarization and photon-energy dependence are employed to separate shift-current and injection-current contributions, with the response peaking under resonant excitation of strongly bound excitons. The data are stated to be consistent with a many-body theoretical description, and the devices are positioned as tunable, helicity-sensitive photodetectors.

Significance. If the attribution of the photocurrent to the magnetic photogalvanic effect from excitons is robust, the result is significant: it supplies the first direct experimental link between spin-dependent symmetry breaking, exciton resonance, and controllable photogalvanic current in a 2D magnet. This validates recent theoretical predictions and demonstrates practical tunability without a built-in junction field, with clear implications for multispectral, polarization-sensitive detectors based on 2D magnets.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (current separation): The decomposition into shift and injection currents is performed via polarization dependence, yet no quantitative model, expected ratio, or uncertainty analysis on the fit is provided; without these it is unclear whether alternative mechanisms (e.g., contact PV or heating) are fully excluded.
  2. [Fig. 3] Fig. 3 (energy dependence): The photocurrent peak is aligned with the exciton resonance, but the figure lacks an overlaid absorption or PL spectrum and contains no calculation of the expected exciton contribution to the photogalvanic tensor; the causal link therefore remains qualitative.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Methods] Methods: CrI3 layer thickness, contact metals, and junction area are stated but not tabulated; a supplementary table would improve reproducibility.
  2. [Discussion] Discussion: The many-body framework is invoked but not summarized even schematically; a short outline or reference to the explicit expressions used would aid readers.
  3. [References] References: Several recent works on exciton-enhanced shift currents in non-magnetic 2D materials are missing; adding them would strengthen context.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and positive evaluation of the significance of our results. We address the major comments point by point below, and will revise the manuscript accordingly where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (current separation): The decomposition into shift and injection currents is performed via polarization dependence, yet no quantitative model, expected ratio, or uncertainty analysis on the fit is provided; without these it is unclear whether alternative mechanisms (e.g., contact PV or heating) are fully excluded.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a more quantitative analysis would strengthen the separation of currents. In the revised version, we will provide a quantitative model for the polarization dependence, including expected ratios of shift to injection currents based on symmetry considerations, along with fit uncertainties. This will further rule out alternative mechanisms like contact photovoltaic effects or thermal contributions, as those would not exhibit the observed magnetic field dependence or specific polarization signatures matching the magnetic photogalvanic effect. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Fig. 3] Fig. 3 (energy dependence): The photocurrent peak is aligned with the exciton resonance, but the figure lacks an overlaid absorption or PL spectrum and contains no calculation of the expected exciton contribution to the photogalvanic tensor; the causal link therefore remains qualitative.

    Authors: We agree that including the absorption spectrum would make the alignment clearer. We will overlay the absorption or photoluminescence spectrum on Fig. 3 in the revision. For the calculation of the exciton contribution to the photogalvanic tensor, a full quantitative many-body calculation is not feasible within the current scope, but the resonance at the exciton energy and consistency with the many-body framework provide strong support. We will add a discussion referencing theoretical predictions for exciton-enhanced photogalvanic effects. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The manuscript is an experimental observation paper demonstrating the magnetic photogalvanic effect via photocurrent measurements in a CrI3 bilayer tunnel junction under controlled magnetic field, electric field, polarization, and illumination energy. No derivation chain, parameter fitting, or theoretical prediction is presented that reduces to its own inputs by construction. The abstract notes that results 'can be captured within a many-body framework' but provides no equations, self-citations, or ansatzes that would trigger any of the enumerated circularity patterns. The central attribution of photocurrent to exciton resonance and spin-dependent symmetry breaking is supported by experimental disentanglement rather than by internal redefinition or self-referential fitting.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; full text would be required to audit these.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5766 in / 1054 out tokens · 25119 ms · 2026-06-29T06:09:10.165141+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    & Rappe, A

    Dai, Z. & Rappe, A. M. Recent progress in the theory of bulk photovoltaic eƯect. Chem. Phys. Rev. 4, 011303 (2023)

    2023

  2. [2]

    Tan, L. Z. et al. Shift current bulk photovoltaic eƯect in polar materials—hybrid and oxide perovskites and beyond. Npj Comput. Mater. 2, 16026 (2016)

    2016

  3. [3]

    Sotome, M. et al. Spectral dynamics of shift current in ferroelectric semiconductor SbSI. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 116, 1929–1933 (2019)

    1929

  4. [4]

    Sipe, J. E. & Shkrebtii, A. I. Second-order optical response in semiconductors. Phys. Rev. B 61, 5337–5352 (2000)

    2000

  5. [5]

    Young, S. M. & Rappe, A. M. First Principles Calculation of the Shift Current Photovoltaic EƯect in Ferroelectrics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 116601 (2012)

    2012

  6. [6]

    G., Morimoto, T

    de Juan, F ., Grushin, A. G., Morimoto, T. & Moore, J. E. Quantized circular photogalvanic eƯect in Weyl semimetals. Nat. Commun. 8, 15995 (2017)

    2017

  7. [7]

    Osterhoudt, G. B. et al. Colossal mid-infrared bulk photovoltaic eƯect in a type-I Weyl semimetal. Nat. Mater. 18, 471–475 (2019)

    2019

  8. [8]

    Ma, J. et al. Nonlinear photoresponse of type-II Weyl semimetals. Nat. Mater. 18, 476– 481 (2019)

    2019

  9. [9]

    Rees, D. et al. Helicity-dependent photocurrents in the chiral Weyl semimetal RhSi. Sci. Adv. 6, eaba0509 (2020)

    2020

  10. [10]

    Ni, Z. et al. Giant topological longitudinal circular photo-galvanic eƯect in the chiral multifold semimetal CoSi. Nat. Commun. 12, 154 (2021)

    2021

  11. [11]

    Orenstein, J. et al. Topology and Symmetry of Quantum Materials via Nonlinear Optical Responses. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 12, 247–272 (2021)

    2021

  12. [12]

    Dong, Y . et al. Giant bulk piezophotovoltaic eƯect in 3R-MoS2. Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 36–41 (2023)

    2023

  13. [13]

    Sangwan, V. K. et al. Bulk photovoltaic eƯect and high mobility in the polar 2D semiconductor SnP2Se6. Sci. Adv. 10, eado8272 (2024)

    2024

  14. [14]

    Zhang, Y . et al. Switchable magnetic bulk photovoltaic eƯect in the two-dimensional magnet CrI3. Nat. Commun. 10, 3783 (2019)

    2019

  15. [15]

    Chen, H. et al. Basic formulation and first-principles implementation of nonlinear magneto-optical eƯects. Phys. Rev. B 105, 075123 (2022)

    2022

  16. [16]

    Jiang, X. et al. Nonlinear Photocurrent as a Hallmark of Altermagnet. ACS Nano 19, 23620–23628 (2025)

    2025

  17. [17]

    Bulk photovoltaic eƯects in altermagnets

    Ezawa, M. Bulk photovoltaic eƯects in altermagnets. Phys. Rev. B 111, L201405 (2025)

    2025

  18. [18]

    & Nagaosa, N

    Morimoto, T. & Nagaosa, N. Topological aspects of nonlinear excitonic processes in noncentrosymmetric crystals. Phys. Rev. B 94, 035117 (2016)

    2016

  19. [19]

    Fei, R., Tan, L. Z. & Rappe, A. M. Shift-current bulk photovoltaic eƯect influenced by quasiparticle and exciton. Phys. Rev. B 101, 045104 (2020)

    2020

  20. [20]

    Y ., da Jornada, F

    Chan, Y .-H., Qiu, D. Y ., da Jornada, F . H. & Louie, S. G. Giant exciton-enhanced shift currents and direct current conduction with subbandgap photo excitations produced by many-electron interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 118, e1906938118 (2021)

    2021

  21. [21]

    & Quek, S

    Lai, M., Xuan, F . & Quek, S. Y . Quantum Geometric Advantage of the Correlated Exciton State in Non-linear Optics. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.02002 (2025)

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.02002 2025

  22. [22]

    & Quek, S

    Lai, M., Xuan, F . & Quek, S. Y . The Bulk Photovoltaic EƯect: Origin of Shift Currents in the Many-Body Picture. https://arxiv.org/html/2402.02002v2 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Takagi, T. et al. Photogalvanic spectroscopy on MnBi2Te4 topological insulator thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 124, 163102 (2024)

    2024

  24. [24]

    Sotome, M. et al. Terahertz emission spectroscopy of ultrafast exciton shift current in the noncentrosymmetric semiconductor CdS. Phys. Rev. B 103, L241111 (2021)

    2021

  25. [25]

    Nakamura, M. et al. Strongly enhanced shift current at exciton resonances in a noncentrosymmetric wide-gap semiconductor. Nat. Commun. 15, 9672 (2024)

    2024

  26. [26]

    & Louie, S

    Wu, M., Li, Z., Cao, T. & Louie, S. G. Physical origin of giant excitonic and magneto- optical responses in two-dimensional ferromagnetic insulators. Nat. Commun. 10, 2371 (2019)

    2019

  27. [27]

    Xiao, R.-C. et al. Classification of second harmonic generation eƯect in magnetically ordered materials. Npj Quantum Mater. 8, 62 (2023)

    2023

  28. [28]

    Wang, Z. et al. Very large tunneling magnetoresistance in layered magnetic semiconductor CrI3. Nat. Commun. 9, 2516 (2018)

    2018

  29. [29]

    Song, T. et al. Giant tunneling magnetoresistance in spin-filter van der Waals heterostructures. Science 360, 1214–1218 (2018)

    2018

  30. [30]

    Klein, D. R. et al. Probing magnetism in 2D van der Waals crystalline insulators via electron tunneling. Science 360, 1218–1222 (2018)

    2018

  31. [31]

    Kim, H. H. et al. One Million Percent Tunnel Magnetoresistance in a Magnetic van der Waals Heterostructure. Nano Lett. 18, 4885–4890 (2018)

    2018

  32. [32]

    Song, T. et al. Spin photovoltaic eƯect in magnetic van der Waals heterostructures. Sci. Adv. 7, eabg8094 (2021)

    2021

  33. [33]

    Yang, B. et al. Macroscopic tunneling probe of Moiré spin textures in twisted CrI3. Nat. Commun. 15, 4982 (2024)

    2024

  34. [34]

    Jin, W. et al. Observation of the polaronic character of excitons in a two-dimensional semiconducting magnet CrI3. Nat. Commun. 11, 4780 (2020)

    2020

  35. [35]

    Grzeszczyk, M. et al. Strongly Correlated Exciton-Magnetization System for Optical Spin Pumping in CrBr3 and CrI3. Adv. Mater. 35, 2209513 (2023)

    2023

  36. [36]

    Sun, Z. et al. Giant nonreciprocal second-harmonic generation from antiferromagnetic bilayer CrI3. Nature 572, 497–501 (2019)

    2019

  37. [37]

    Symmetry-adapted tensors constrained by magnetic and nonmagnetic groups

    Xiao, R.-C. Symmetry-adapted tensors constrained by magnetic and nonmagnetic groups. https://ruichun.github.io/TensorSymmetry/index.html

  38. [38]

    Zenkevich, A. et al. Giant bulk photovoltaic eƯect in thin ferroelectric BaTiO3 films. Phys. Rev. B 90, 161409 (2014)

    2014

  39. [39]

    & Sipe, J

    Aversa, C. & Sipe, J. E. Nonlinear optical susceptibilities of semiconductors: Results with a length-gauge analysis. Phys. Rev. B 52, 14636–14645 (1995)

    1995

  40. [40]

    & Nagaosa, N

    Xie, Y .-M. & Nagaosa, N. Photon-drag photovoltaic eƯects and quantum geometric nature. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 122, e2424294122 (2025)

    2025

  41. [41]

    Kim, H. H. et al. Evolution of interlayer and intralayer magnetism in three atomically thin chromium trihalides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 116, 11131–11136 (2019). Extended Data Fig. 1 | power dependence of zero-bias photocurrent. Zero-bias photocurrent 𝐼௣௛ =𝐼௟௜௚௛௧−𝐼ௗ௔௥௞ of Device 1 as a function of incident laser power in log-log cale. The data is well-desc...

    2019