pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.31255 · v2 · pith:L6NPF3QAnew · submitted 2026-05-29 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas · cond-mat.mes-hall

Charged Bose polarons at finite momentum

Grover Andrade-S\'anchez , Arturo Camacho-Guardian This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 19:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords charged bose polaronfinite momentumfinite-range interactiondamping ratequasiparticle energymany-body dressingion-atom interaction
0
0 comments X

The pith

Finite-range ion-atom forces create a momentum scale that maximizes dressing and dissipation for charged Bose polarons.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The work studies charged impurities moving through a Bose gas at nonzero momentum. It finds that the finite range of the interaction sets a characteristic momentum where many-body dressing and energy dissipation both reach a maximum, producing non-monotonic curves for the quasiparticle energy and damping rate. Beyond that scale the damping rate falls as one over momentum, restoring nearly free motion of the impurity. This behavior is absent in zero-range models, which instead predict ever-increasing dissipation with momentum.

Core claim

A diagrammatic calculation within second-order perturbation theory shows that the finite range of the ion-atom interaction introduces a characteristic momentum scale at which many-body dressing and dissipation are maximized, yielding non-monotonic momentum dependence of both the damping rate and the quasiparticle energy; in the high-momentum regime the damping rate obeys the scaling law Γ_p ~ 1/p, which signals suppression of many-body dressing and recovery of quasi-free impurity dynamics.

What carries the argument

Diagrammatic second-order perturbation theory for the charged Bose polaron that incorporates the finite range of the ion-atom potential and thereby generates a characteristic momentum scale.

If this is right

  • Damping rate reaches its largest value at the momentum set by the interaction range.
  • Quasiparticle energy displays non-monotonic momentum dependence.
  • At high momentum the damping rate obeys Γ_p ~ 1/p, suppressing many-body dressing.
  • Contact-interaction treatments incorrectly predict divergent damping instead of the 1/p decay.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Transport coefficients and mobility in ion-atom mixtures should exhibit a peak near the interaction-range momentum.
  • The same non-monotonic pattern may appear in other finite-range polaron problems once momentum dependence is examined.
  • Direct measurement of the high-momentum 1/p tail would test the suppression of dressing predicted by the calculation.

Load-bearing premise

Second-order perturbation theory remains quantitatively accurate over the entire momentum range, including near the scale set by the interaction range, without higher-order diagrams becoming essential.

What would settle it

An experimental plot of damping rate versus impurity momentum that either shows a clear maximum at the momentum fixed by the interaction range followed by a 1/p decay, or fails to exhibit that non-monotonic pattern.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.31255 by Arturo Camacho-Guardian, Grover Andrade-S\'anchez.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic phase diagram of the finite-momentum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Scattering length [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Second-order Feynman diagrams contributing to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Damping rate Γ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Momentum dependence of the scaled damping rate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Quasiparticle residue [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Energy shift ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Charged impurities in quantum fluids have unveiled new classes of strongly correlated many-body states across condensed matter, ultracold gases, and hybrid atom-ion platforms. While previous studies have primarily focused on their ground-state and static properties, much less is known about their finite-momentum behavior, which governs transport, dissipation, and quasiparticle stability. Here, we investigate the momentum-dependent properties of a charged Bose polaron using a diagrammatic approach within second-order perturbation theory, explicitly accounting for the finite-range nature of the ion-atom interaction. We show that the interaction range introduces a characteristic momentum scale at which many-body dressing and dissipation are maximized, leading to a non-monotonic behavior of the damping rate and quasiparticle energy. In the high-momentum regime, we uncover a scaling law $\Gamma_p \sim 1/p$, signaling the suppression of many-body dressing and the recovery of quasi-free impurity dynamics, in stark contrast to the divergent behavior predicted by contact-interaction perturbative treatments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the finite-momentum properties of charged Bose polarons in a quantum fluid using a diagrammatic second-order perturbation theory that incorporates the finite range of the ion-atom interaction. It claims that the interaction range sets a characteristic momentum scale at which many-body dressing and dissipation are maximized, producing non-monotonic behavior in the damping rate and quasiparticle energy; at high momenta the damping follows Γ_p ∼ 1/p, indicating suppression of dressing and recovery of quasi-free dynamics, in contrast to divergent behavior for contact interactions.

Significance. If the second-order results are quantitatively reliable, the work identifies how finite-range effects can produce a momentum scale that maximizes dissipation and a high-momentum scaling that suppresses many-body corrections, offering testable predictions for transport and stability in atom-ion platforms. The explicit inclusion of finite-range interactions over contact approximations is a clear technical advance within the perturbative framework.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and the perturbative framework: the central claims of non-monotonic damping maximized at a characteristic momentum and the Γ_p ∼ 1/p high-momentum scaling are obtained from second-order diagrammatic perturbation theory, yet no verification is supplied that the expansion parameter remains small near the interaction-range momentum scale where dressing peaks; without such control (e.g., third-order estimates or comparison to non-perturbative benchmarks), the reported location of the maximum and the scaling law rest on an untested assumption.
  2. [Abstract] The contrast with contact-interaction treatments: the manuscript states that contact interactions produce divergent high-momentum behavior while finite range yields Γ_p ∼ 1/p, but this distinction is derived entirely within the same second-order approximation; if vertex corrections or higher bubble diagrams become O(1) at the reported peak scale, both the non-monotonicity and the scaling could shift, making the contrast load-bearing on the unverified validity of the truncation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address the two major comments on the perturbative framework point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and the perturbative framework: the central claims of non-monotonic damping maximized at a characteristic momentum and the Γ_p ∼ 1/p high-momentum scaling are obtained from second-order diagrammatic perturbation theory, yet no verification is supplied that the expansion parameter remains small near the interaction-range momentum scale where dressing peaks; without such control (e.g., third-order estimates or comparison to non-perturbative benchmarks), the reported location of the maximum and the scaling law rest on an untested assumption.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript presents results exclusively within second-order perturbation theory and does not supply third-order estimates or non-perturbative benchmarks to confirm the expansion parameter remains small at the interaction-range momentum scale. The non-monotonic features and Γ_p ∼ 1/p scaling are direct consequences of the finite-range potential entering the second-order self-energy. We will revise by adding an explicit discussion of the expected validity regime, parameterized by the dimensionless interaction strength and the ratio of impurity momentum to the inverse range, while clarifying that the reported momentum scale and scaling are predictions of this controlled truncation. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The contrast with contact-interaction treatments: the manuscript states that contact interactions produce divergent high-momentum behavior while finite range yields Γ_p ∼ 1/p, but this distinction is derived entirely within the same second-order approximation; if vertex corrections or higher bubble diagrams become O(1) at the reported peak scale, both the non-monotonicity and the scaling could shift, making the contrast load-bearing on the unverified validity of the truncation.

    Authors: The contrast is obtained at the same perturbative order, where the finite-range form factor provides a natural cutoff that eliminates the ultraviolet divergence present for contact interactions. We will revise the abstract and main text to state explicitly that the comparison holds within second-order theory and that higher-order diagrams could modify quantitative details, while noting that the qualitative suppression of high-momentum dressing is tied to the range of the potential already at this order. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Explicit verification that the expansion parameter remains small near the interaction-range momentum scale, via third-order estimates or non-perturbative benchmarks

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; results are direct outputs of second-order perturbation theory

full rationale

The derivation proceeds from the finite-range ion-atom interaction via an explicit second-order diagrammatic expansion. The reported non-monotonic damping rate, characteristic momentum scale, and high-momentum scaling Γ_p ~ 1/p are obtained by direct evaluation of the resulting self-energy expressions; they are not fitted parameters renamed as predictions, not defined in terms of themselves, and not justified by self-citations or imported uniqueness theorems. The calculation is self-contained against the stated perturbative framework with no reduction of outputs to inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on the domain assumption that second-order diagrammatic perturbation theory suffices; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Second-order perturbation theory captures the essential momentum dependence of the charged Bose polaron without higher-order corrections dominating near the interaction-range scale.
    Explicitly stated as the method used in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5700 in / 1198 out tokens · 23267 ms · 2026-06-28T19:52:08.967123+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The moving Fermi polaron

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Experiments map the dispersion of moving Fermi polarons, finding constant effective mass at low momentum, bare-particle behavior at high momentum, and a motion-induced transition into a molecule-hole continuum for att...

  2. Effects of interaction range on the mean-field dynamics of Bose polarons

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Finite-range interactions cause damped oscillatory impurity velocity relaxation in Bose polarons, with ion-atom potentials producing longer equilibration times and larger effective mass differences than local potentia...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Cerenkovet al., Visible emission of clean liquids by action ofγradiation, inDokl

    P. Cerenkovet al., Visible emission of clean liquids by action ofγradiation, inDokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Vol. 2 (1934) pp. 451–454

    1934

  2. [2]

    K. K. Nielsen and L. P. Ardila, Critical slowdown of non- equilibrium polaron dynamics, New Journal of Physics 21, 043014 (2019)

    2019

  3. [3]

    C. J. Mathy, M. B. Zvonarev, and E. Demler, Quantum flutter of supersonic particles in one-dimensional quan- tum liquids, Nature Physics8, 881 (2012)

    2012

  4. [4]

    M. Knap, C. J. M. Mathy, M. Ganahl, M. B. Zvonarev, and E. Demler, Quantum flutter: Signatures and robust- ness, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 015302 (2014)

    2014

  5. [5]

    P. E. Dolgirev, Y.-F. Qu, M. B. Zvonarev, T. Shi, and E. Demler, Emergence of a sharp quantum collective mode in a one-dimensional fermi polaron, Physical Re- view X11, 041015 (2021)

    2021

  6. [6]

    Schmidt, T

    R. Schmidt, T. Enss, V. Pietil¨ a, and E. Demler, Fermi polarons in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. A85, 021602(R) (2012)

    2012

  7. [7]

    Cotlet, D

    O. Cotlet, D. S. Wild, M. D. Lukin, and A. Imamoglu, Rotons in optical excitation spectra of monolayer semi- conductors, Phys. Rev. B101, 205409 (2020)

    2020

  8. [8]

    Seetharam, Y

    K. Seetharam, Y. Shchadilova, F. Grusdt, M. B. Zvonarev, and E. Demler, Dynamical quantum cherenkov transition of fast impurities in quantum liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 185302 (2021)

    2021

  9. [9]

    Seetharam, Y

    K. Seetharam, Y. Shchadilova, F. Grusdt, M. Zvonarev, and E. Demler, Quantum cherenkov transition of finite- momentum bose polarons, Phys. Rev. A110, 063306 (2024)

    2024

  10. [10]

    Polarons in atomic gases and two-dimensional semiconductors

    P. Massignan, R. Schmidt, G. E. Astrakharchik, A. ˙Imamoglu, M. Zwierlein, J. J. Arlt, and G. M. Bruun, Polarons in atomic gases and two-dimensional semicon- ductors, arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.09618 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    Impurities and polarons in bosonic quantum gases: A review on recent progress, Reports on Progress in Physics 88, 066401 (2025)

    2025

  12. [12]

    M.-G. Hu, M. J. Van de Graaff, D. Kedar, J. P. Corson, E. A. Cornell, and D. S. Jin, Bose polarons in the strongly interacting regime, Physical review letters117, 055301 (2016)

    2016

  13. [13]

    N. B. Jørgensen, L. Wacker, K. T. Skalmstang, M. M. Parish, J. Levinsen, R. S. Christensen, G. M. Bruun, and J. J. Arlt, Observation of attractive and repulsive polarons in a bose-einstein condensate, Physical review letters117, 055302 (2016)

    2016

  14. [14]

    L. P. Ardila and S. Giorgini, Impurity in a bose-einstein condensate: Study of the attractive and repulsive branch using quantum monte carlo methods, Physical Review A 92, 033612 (2015)

    2015

  15. [15]

    M. G. Skou, T. G. Skov, N. B. Jørgensen, K. K. Nielsen, A. Camacho-Guardian, T. Pohl, G. M. Bruun, and J. J. Arlt, Non-equilibrium quantum dynamics and formation of the bose polaron, Nature Physics17, 731 (2021)

    2021

  16. [16]

    M. G. Skou, K. K. Nielsen, T. G. Skov, A. M. Morgen, N. B. Jørgensen, A. Camacho-Guardian, T. Pohl, G. M. Bruun, and J. J. Arlt, Life and death of the bose polaron, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 043093 (2022)

    2022

  17. [17]

    Z. Z. Yan, Y. Ni, C. Robens, and M. W. Zwierlein, Bose polarons near quantum criticality, Science368, 190 (2020)

    2020

  18. [18]

    M. Sun, H. Zhai, and X. Cui, Visualizing the efimov cor- relation in bose polarons, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 013401 (2017)

    2017

  19. [19]

    Christianen, J

    A. Christianen, J. I. Cirac, and R. Schmidt, Bose po- laron and the efimov effect: A gaussian-state approach, 8 Physical Review A105, 053302 (2022)

    2022

  20. [20]

    Levinsen, M

    J. Levinsen, M. M. Parish, and G. M. Bruun, Impurity in a bose-einstein condensate and the efimov effect, Physical Review Letters115, 125302 (2015)

    2015

  21. [21]

    P. Naidon, Two Impurities in a Bose-Einstein Conden- sate: From Yukawa to Efimov Attracted Polarons, Jour- nal of the Physical Society of Japan87, 043002 (2018), arXiv:1607.04507 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  22. [22]

    A. M. Morgen, S. S. Balling, K. K. Nielsen, T. Pohl, G. M. Bruun, and J. J. Arlt, Quantum beat spectroscopy of repulsive bose polarons, Phys. Rev. Res.7, L022002 (2025)

    2025

  23. [23]

    Paredes, G

    R. Paredes, G. Bruun, and A. Camacho-Guardian, Per- spective: Interactions mediated by atoms, photons, elec- trons, and excitons, arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.13795 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Role of impurity statistics and medium constraints in polaron-polaron interactions

    J. Levinsen, F. M. Marchetti, O. Bleu, and M. M. Parish, Role of impurity statistics and medium con- straints in polaron-polaron interactions, arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.01413 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Levinsen, O

    J. Levinsen, O. Bleu, and M. M. Parish, Medium- enhanced polaron repulsion in a dilute bose mixture, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 113402 (2025)

    2025

  26. [26]

    A. M. Morgen, S. S. Balling, M. T. Strøe, T. G. Skov, M. R. Skou, K. K. Nielsen, A. Camacho-Guardian, G. M. Bruun, and J. J. Arlt, Observation of low- lying impurity states in Bose-Einstein condensates, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2604.18033 (2026), arXiv:2604.18033 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  27. [27]

    S. Ding, G. Dom´ ınguez-Castro, A. Julku, A. Cama- cho Guardian, and G. M. Bruun, Polarons and bipolarons in a two-dimensional square lattice, SciPost Physics14, 143 (2023)

    2023

  28. [28]

    Santiago-Garc´ ıa, S

    M. Santiago-Garc´ ıa, S. G. Castillo-L´ opez, and A. Camacho-Guardian, Lattice polaron in a bose–einstein condensate of hard-core bosons, New Journal of Physics 26, 063015 (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    Santiago-Garc´ ıa and A

    M. Santiago-Garc´ ıa and A. Camacho-Guardian, Collec- tive excitations of a bose–einstein condensate of hard- core bosons and their mediated interactions: from two- body bound states to mediated superfluidity, New Jour- nal of Physics25, 093032 (2023)

    2023

  30. [30]

    Alhyder and G

    R. Alhyder and G. M. Bruun, Mobile impurity probing a two-dimensional superfluid phase transition, Phys. Rev. A105, 063303 (2022)

    2022

  31. [31]

    Vashisht, I

    A. Vashisht, I. Amelio, L. Vanderstraeten, G. M. Bruun, O. K. Diessel, and N. Goldman, Chiral polaron forma- tion on the edge of topological quantum matter, Nature communications16, 4918 (2025)

    2025

  32. [32]

    Alhyder, V

    R. Alhyder, V. Colussi, M. ˇCufar, J. Brand, A. Recati, and G. M. Bruun, Lattice bose polarons at strong cou- pling and quantum criticality, SciPost Physics19, 002 (2025)

    2025

  33. [33]

    Isaule, A

    F. Isaule, A. Rojo-Franc` as, L. Morales-Molina, and B. Juli´ a-D´ ıaz, Counterflow of lattice polarons in har- monically confined optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 023404 (2025)

    2025

  34. [34]

    V. R. Yordanov and F. Isaule, Mobile impurities inter- acting with a few one-dimensional lattice bosons, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics56, 045301 (2023)

    2023

  35. [35]

    Hartweg, T

    T. Hartweg, T. Gupta, and G. Pupillo, Bose-hubbard polaron from weak to strong coupling, Phys. Rev. B112, L220201 (2025)

    2025

  36. [36]

    Rojo-Franc` as, F

    A. Rojo-Franc` as, F. Isaule, and B. Juli´ a-D´ ıaz, Few par- ticles with an impurity in a one-dimensional harmonic trap, Physica Scripta99, 045408 (2024)

    2024

  37. [37]

    Dom´ ınguez-Castro, L

    G. Dom´ ınguez-Castro, L. Santos, and L. P. Ardila, Po- larons and bipolarons in the rydberg-dressed extended bose-hubbard model, Physical Review B113, 035111 (2026)

    2026

  38. [38]

    Schmidt, J

    R. Schmidt, J. D. Whalen, R. Ding, F. Camargo, G. Woehl, S. Yoshida, J. Burgd¨ orfer, F. B. Dunning, E. Demler, H. R. Sadeghpour, and T. C. Killian, Theory of excitation of rydberg polarons in an atomic quantum gas, Phys. Rev. A97, 022707 (2018)

    2018

  39. [39]

    L. A. P. Ardila and T. Pohl, Ground-state properties of dipolar bose polarons, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics52, 015004 (2018)

    2018

  40. [40]

    A. G. Volosniev, G. Bighin, L. Santos, and L. A. P. Ardila, Non-equilibrium dynamics of dipolar polarons, SciPost Phys.15, 232 (2023)

    2023

  41. [41]

    Hirzler, R

    H. Hirzler, R. S. Lous, E. Trimby, J. P´ erez-R´ ıos, A. Safavi-Naini, and R. Gerritsma, Observation of chem- ical reactions between a trapped ion and ultracold fesh- bach dimers, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 103401 (2022)

    2022

  42. [42]

    R. S. Lous and R. Gerritsma, Chapter two - ultracold ion-atom experiments: cooling, chemistry, and quantum effects, inAdvances in Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, Advances In Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, Vol. 71, edited by L. F. DiMauro, H. Perrin, and S. F. Yelin (Academic Press, 2022) pp. 65–133

    2022

  43. [43]

    Mohammadi, A

    A. Mohammadi, A. Kr¨ ukow, A. Mahdian, M. Deiß, J. P´ erez-R´ ıos, H. da Silva, M. Raoult, O. Dulieu, and J. Hecker Denschlag, Life and death of a cold barb + molecule inside an ultracold cloud of rb atoms, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 013196 (2021)

    2021

  44. [44]

    Dieterle, M

    T. Dieterle, M. Berngruber, C. H¨ olzl, R. L¨ ow, K. Jachymski, T. Pfau, and F. Meinert, Inelastic collision dynamics of a single cold ion immersed in a bose-einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A102, 041301 (2020)

    2020

  45. [45]

    Dieterle, M

    T. Dieterle, M. Berngruber, C. H¨ olzl, R. L¨ ow, K. Jachymski, T. Pfau, and F. Meinert, Transport of a single cold ion immersed in a bose-einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 033401 (2021)

    2021

  46. [46]

    Weckesser, F

    P. Weckesser, F. Thielemann, D. Wiater, A. Wo- jciechowska, L. Karpa, K. Jachymski, M. Tomza, T. Walker, and T. Schaetz, Observation of feshbach reso- nances between a single ion and ultracold atoms, Nature 600, 429 (2021)

    2021

  47. [47]

    Chowdhury and J

    S. Chowdhury and J. Perez-R´ ıos, Ion solvation in atomic baths: from snowballs to polarons, Natural Sciences4, e20240006 (2024)

    2024

  48. [48]

    Pessoa, S

    R. Pessoa, S. A. Vitiello, and L. A. P. n. Ardila, Fermi po- laron in atom-ion hybrid systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 233002 (2024)

    2024

  49. [49]

    E. R. Christensen, A. Camacho-Guardian, and G. M. Bruun, Charged polarons and molecules in a bose- einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 243001 (2021)

    2021

  50. [50]

    G. E. Astrakharchik, L. A. P. Ardila, R. Schmidt, K. Jachymski, and A. Negretti, Ionic polaron in a bose-einstein condensate, Communications Physics4, 1 (2021)

    2021

  51. [51]

    G. E. Astrakharchik, L. A. P. Ardila, K. Jachymski, and A. Negretti, Many-body bound states and induced inter- actions of charged impurities in a bosonic bath, Nature communications14, 1647 (2023)

    2023

  52. [52]

    Cavazos Olivas, L

    U. Cavazos Olivas, L. A. Pe˜ na Ardila, and K. Jachym- 9 ski, Modified mean-field ansatz for charged polarons in a bose-einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A110, L011301 (2024)

    2024

  53. [53]

    L. H. A. Simons, M. Wouters, and J. Tempere, Path- integral ground state and optical response of the charged bose polaron, Phys. Rev. A110, 043301 (2024)

    2024

  54. [54]

    Wysocki, M

    P. Wysocki, M. Tylutki, and K. Jachymski, Dynamics of a mobile ion in a bose–einstein condensate, New Journal of Physics28, 013201 (2026)

    2026

  55. [55]

    Cˆ ot´ e, V

    R. Cˆ ot´ e, V. Kharchenko, and M. D. Lukin, Mesoscopic molecular ions in bose-einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 093001 (2002)

    2002

  56. [56]

    Massignan, C

    P. Massignan, C. J. Pethick, and H. Smith, Static proper- ties of positive ions in atomic bose-einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A71, 023606 (2005)

    2005

  57. [57]

    T. A. Yo˘ gurt and M. T. Eiles, Quasiparticle properties of long-range impurities in a bose condensate, Phys. Rev. A 112, 063313 (2025)

    2025

  58. [58]

    S. Ding, M. Drewsen, J. J. Arlt, and G. M. Bruun, Me- diated interaction between ions in quantum degenerate gases, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 153401 (2022)

    2022

  59. [59]

    K. K. Nielsen, L. A. P. Ardila, G. M. Bruun, and T. Pohl, Critical slowdown of non-equilibrium polaron dynamics, New Journal of Physics21, 043014 (2019)

    2019

  60. [60]

    R. S. Christensen, J. Levinsen, and G. M. Bruun, Quasi- particle properties of a mobile impurity in a bose-einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 160401 (2015)

    2015

  61. [61]

    S. P. Rath and R. Schmidt, Field-theoretical study of the bose polaron, Physical Review A88, 053632 (2013)

    2013

  62. [62]

    Levinsen, M

    J. Levinsen, M. M. Parish, R. S. Christensen, J. J. Arlt, and G. M. Bruun, Finite-temperature behavior of the bose polaron, Phys. Rev. A96, 063622 (2017)

    2017