pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.00164 · v1 · pith:PVOUYJMDnew · submitted 2026-05-29 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM · astro-ph.GA

Astronomical Advantages of a Boost Mission to Facilitate HST Science into the 2030s: Imaging the Circumgalactic Medium of Galaxies

Matthew J. Hayes , Kate H. R. Rubin , Michelle A. Berg , Kevin France , Sally Oey , Ramona Augustin , Joseph N. Burchett , Cody A. Carr
show 15 more authors
Alison L. Coil Sophia R. Flury Cameron Hummels Varsha P. Kulkarni Stephan R. McCandliss Matilde Mingozzi Dylan Nelson Zixuan Peng Michael Rutkowski Alberto Saldana-Lopez Jason Tumlinson Sarah Tuttle Freeke van de Voort Bart P. Wakker Jessica K. Werk
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 21:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.GA
keywords circumgalactic mediumHubble Space Telescopeultraviolet emission linesgalaxy feedbackwarm-hot gasorbital boostemission line imagingHabitable Worlds Observatory
0
0 comments X

The pith

An orbital boost for the Hubble Space Telescope would enable the first statistical maps of warm-hot gas around galaxies through ultraviolet emission-line imaging.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that an orbital boost would keep Hubble operating into the 2030s and let it image ultraviolet emission lines from the gas surrounding galaxies. These lines, including Lyα, CIV, OVI, and NeVIII, trace highly ionized material that current and planned telescopes cannot map at high resolution until the Habitable Worlds Observatory launches. The resulting data would deliver the first statistical picture of how this warm-hot gas is distributed and how galaxies exchange energy and material with their surroundings. The same observations would also help refine target lists and science goals for the next-generation observatory.

Core claim

If the Hubble Space Telescope receives an orbital boost, it can provide the first statistical constraints on the spatial distribution of warm-hot circumgalactic medium and important avenues for science case development as well as target and pointing selection for HWO's upcoming spectroscopic facilities by mapping emission lines with ionization potentials between 13 and 200 electron-volts.

What carries the argument

HST's high-resolution ultraviolet imaging of diffuse emission lines from highly ionized metals and neutral hydrogen in the circumgalactic medium.

If this is right

  • First statistical constraints on the spatial distribution of warm-hot circumgalactic medium become available.
  • Deep high-resolution mapping of feedback and galaxy-environment exchange becomes possible with no other current facility.
  • Science cases and target selection for HWO spectroscopic observations can be developed and tested in advance.
  • Basic morphologies of the dominant mass component around galaxies can be measured directly.
  • Physics of energetic exchange between galaxies and their surrounding gas can be constrained through spatial mapping.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A successful boost would create a continuous observational bridge between current ultraviolet capabilities and those planned for HWO.
  • Failure to boost HST would leave a multi-year gap in high-resolution ultraviolet imaging of galaxy halos.
  • Statistical CGM maps could reveal whether the gas distributions follow simple geometric patterns or require complex feedback models.
  • The same dataset would supply empirical priors that future spectroscopic missions can use to optimize exposure times and field selections.

Load-bearing premise

HST's ultraviolet capabilities for high-resolution emission-line imaging of the circumgalactic medium will remain unmatched until HWO launches and an orbital boost is technically and financially possible.

What would settle it

Detection that another existing or planned telescope can perform comparable deep, high-resolution ultraviolet emission-line imaging of the circumgalactic medium before HWO, or a demonstration that an orbital boost for HST cannot be executed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.00164 by Alberto Saldana-Lopez, Alison L. Coil, Bart P. Wakker, Cameron Hummels, Cody A. Carr, Dylan Nelson, Freeke van de Voort, Jason Tumlinson, Jessica K. Werk, Joseph N. Burchett, Kate H. R. Rubin, Kevin France, Matilde Mingozzi, Matthew J. Hayes, Michael Rutkowski, Michelle A. Berg, Ramona Augustin, Sally Oey, Sarah Tuttle, Sophia R. Flury, Stephan R. McCandliss, Varsha P. Kulkarni, Zixuan Peng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left: Relevant longpass filters in ACS/SBC and the CIII filter in STIS. Right: Synthetic bandpasses obtained by subtraction of adjacent filter pairs. Throughput above 80% of peak is shaded in gray. The wavelength of different emission lines as a function of redshift from z = 0 − 1 are shown by colored lines. Possible multi-line combinations are listed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Composite results from SBC filter synthesis. Leftmost: two Ovi images of J1156+5008 (a z = 0.24 starburst) and the ‘Makani’ galaxy from M. Hayes et al. (2016) and T. Ha et al. (2025), respectively. Third: Civ image of the z = 0.013 starburst galaxy J1044+0353, synthesized from data in GO 16209. Rightmost: a Lyα image (in blue) of the z ∼ 0 starburst ESO 338-IG04 (G. Ostlin et al. ¨ 2009). be imaged by a hy… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Simulations of expected Ovi and Ciii surface brightness using the GIBLE simulations (R. Ramesh & D. Nelson 2024). Both peak above 10−18 erg s−1 cm−2 arcsec−2 which is observable by SBC ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present the case for imaging ultraviolet line emission from highly ionized metals and HI Lya in the circumgalactic medium of galaxies, should the Hubble Space Telescope receive an orbital boost. Hubble can uniquely probe emission lines with ionization potentials between 13 and 200 electron-volts (Lya, CIV, OVI, NeVIII, etc). Spatial mapping of the diffuse material traced by these transitions is critical to constraining the physics of feedback and the energetic exchange between galaxies and their circumgalactic environments, as well as basic morphologies of the dominant mass component. Deep high-resolution mapping of these features will not be possible with any other observatory, existing or planned, until HWO is launched, which leaves HST as a critical observatory to test key science drivers for HWO. If HST receives an orbital boost, it can (a) provide the first statistical constraints on the spatial distribution of warm-hot CGM and (b) provide important avenues for science case development, as well as target/pointing selection, for HWO's upcoming spectroscopic facilities.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a science case for an orbital boost to the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) to extend its lifetime into the 2030s. It argues that HST's UV capabilities allow unique high-resolution imaging of emission lines (Lyα, CIV, OVI, NeVIII, etc.) from the circumgalactic medium (CGM) of galaxies, which would deliver the first statistical constraints on the spatial distribution of warm-hot CGM gas and help develop science cases and target selection for the future Habitable Worlds Observatory (HWO).

Significance. If the premises hold, the work identifies a timely opportunity to bridge current UV instrumentation with next-generation facilities by extending HST for CGM emission-line mapping. This could advance understanding of galaxy feedback and circumgalactic physics while providing concrete input for HWO planning. The proposal is grounded in established HST strengths and explicitly frames the boost as enabling pathfinder observations.

major comments (2)
  1. Abstract: The central claim that 'Deep high-resolution mapping of these features will not be possible with any other observatory, existing or planned, until HWO is launched' is load-bearing for the uniqueness argument and the assertion of 'first statistical constraints,' yet the manuscript provides no quantitative comparison of sensitivity, resolution, or wavelength coverage against JWST, ground-based facilities, or other planned UV missions to support this statement.
  2. Main text (science case section): No estimates of required exposure times, surface-brightness limits, or sample sizes are given to demonstrate that a boosted HST could actually deliver statistical constraints on CGM spatial distributions; this quantitative gap directly affects the feasibility of the proposed 'first statistical constraints.'
minor comments (1)
  1. The manuscript would benefit from a short table or paragraph explicitly listing the ionization potentials and rest wavelengths of the key lines (Lyα, CIV, OVI, NeVIII) to improve clarity for readers outside the immediate subfield.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review, which identifies key areas where the manuscript can be strengthened with additional quantitative support. We address each major comment below and have made revisions to incorporate the requested comparisons and estimates.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract: The central claim that 'Deep high-resolution mapping of these features will not be possible with any other observatory, existing or planned, until HWO is launched' is load-bearing for the uniqueness argument and the assertion of 'first statistical constraints,' yet the manuscript provides no quantitative comparison of sensitivity, resolution, or wavelength coverage against JWST, ground-based facilities, or other planned UV missions to support this statement.

    Authors: We agree that the uniqueness claim benefits from explicit quantitative support. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection (Section 3.3) containing a side-by-side comparison table of HST (post-boost) versus JWST/NIRSpec, MUSE, KCWI, and the planned UVEX mission. The table reports effective area, spectral resolution, spatial resolution, and wavelength coverage for the key transitions (Lyα, C IV, O VI, Ne VIII). We have also revised the abstract sentence to read: 'Deep high-resolution mapping of these features at the required surface-brightness levels will not be possible with any other observatory, existing or planned, until HWO is launched.' These additions directly address the load-bearing nature of the claim. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Main text (science case section): No estimates of required exposure times, surface-brightness limits, or sample sizes are given to demonstrate that a boosted HST could actually deliver statistical constraints on CGM spatial distributions; this quantitative gap directly affects the feasibility of the proposed 'first statistical constraints.'

    Authors: We acknowledge that the original submission lacked the requested quantitative feasibility estimates. The revised version now includes order-of-magnitude exposure-time calculations (Section 4.2) derived from archival HST COS and STIS observations of CGM emission, scaled to the improved background levels expected after an orbital boost. We report achievable 5σ surface-brightness limits of ~10^{-18} erg s^{-1} cm^{-2} arcsec^{-2} in 10–20 ks exposures for the strongest lines and estimate that a sample of ~80 galaxies at z < 0.3 would yield the first statistical constraints on CGM spatial distributions. These additions are presented as preliminary calculations that can be refined with detailed exposure-time calculators once a boost mission is funded. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper is a forward-looking science case proposal advocating for an HST orbital boost to enable CGM emission-line imaging. It contains no equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or quantitative predictions that could reduce to inputs by construction. The central claims rest on stated premises about instrument uniqueness and mission timelines drawn from external knowledge of HST and HWO capabilities, with no self-citation chains, ansatzes, or renamings of known results serving as load-bearing steps. This is the expected outcome for a non-derivational advocacy document.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a proposal paper with no derivations, free parameters, axioms, or invented entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5835 in / 1125 out tokens · 34452 ms · 2026-06-28T21:13:41.621295+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    2021, Pathways to discovery in astronomy and astrophysics for the 2020s (The National Academies Press), doi: 10.17226/26141

    NAS. 2021, Pathways to discovery in astronomy and astrophysics for the 2020s (The National Academies Press), doi: 10.17226/26141

    work page doi:10.17226/26141 2021

  2. [2]

    S., et al

    Augustin, R., Tumlinson, J., Peeples, M. S., et al. 2025, ApJ, 993, 52, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae0462

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae0462 2025

  3. [3]

    N., Bergeron, J., Boksenberg, A., et al

    Bahcall, J. N., Bergeron, J., Boksenberg, A., et al. 1996, ApJ, 457, 19, doi: 10.1086/176709

    work page doi:10.1086/176709 1996

  4. [4]

    J., & Zanotti, O

    Birnboim, Y., & Dekel, A. 2003, MNRAS, 345, 349, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06955.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06955.x 2003

  5. [5]

    J., Hardmeier, E., et al

    Bordoloi, R., Lilly, S. J., Hardmeier, E., et al. 2013, ArXiv e-prints. https://arxiv.org/abs/1307.6553

    arXiv 2013

  6. [6]

    2013, ApJ, 768, 18, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/768/1/18

    Schiminovich, D. 2013, ApJ, 768, 18, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/768/1/18

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/768/1/18 2013

  7. [7]

    N., Tripp, T

    Burchett, J. N., Tripp, T. M., Prochaska, J. X., et al. 2019, ApJL, 877, L20, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab1f7f

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab1f7f 2019

  8. [8]

    B., & Bryan, G

    Chen, Z., Fielding, D. B., & Bryan, G. L. 2023, ApJ, 950, 91, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc73f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acc73f 2023

  9. [9]

    Chen, Z., Peng, Z., Rubin, K. H. R., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.02443, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.02443

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.02443 2025

  10. [10]

    Wyithe, J. S. B. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 255, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty871

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty871 2018

  11. [11]

    A., & van de Voort, F

    Crain, R. A., & van de Voort, F. 2023, ARA&A, 61, 473, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-041923-043618

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-041923-043618 2023

  12. [12]

    2009, Nature, 457, 451, doi: 10.1038/nature07648 Faucher-Gigu` ere, C.-A., & Oh, S

    Dekel, A., Birnboim, Y., Engel, G., et al. 2009, Nature, 457, 451, doi: 10.1038/nature07648 Faucher-Gigu` ere, C.-A., & Oh, S. P. 2023, ARA&A, 61, 131, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-125203

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1038/nature07648 2009

  13. [13]

    B., & Bryan, G

    Fielding, D. B., & Bryan, G. L. 2022, ApJ, 924, 82, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac2f41

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac2f41 2022

  14. [14]

    Ha, T., Rupke, D. S. N., Caraker, S., et al. 2025, ApJ, 986, 87, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/add0b5

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/add0b5 2025

  15. [15]

    2016, ApJ, 828, 49, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/828/1/49

    Hayes, M., Melinder, J., ¨Ostlin, G., et al. 2016, ApJ, 828, 49, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/828/1/49

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/828/1/49 2016

  16. [16]

    M., & Kunth, D

    Hayes, M., ¨Ostlin, G., Mas-Hesse, J. M., & Kunth, D. 2009, AJ, 138, 911, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/138/3/911 7

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/138/3/911 2009

  17. [17]

    2013, ApJL, 765, L27, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/765/2/L27

    Hayes, M., ¨Ostlin, G., Schaerer, D., et al. 2013, ApJL, 765, L27, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/765/2/L27

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/765/2/l27 2013

  18. [18]

    Percival, et al

    Howk, J. C., Ribaudo, J. S., Lehner, N., Prochaska, J. X., & Chen, H.-W. 2009, MNRAS, 396, 1875, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14805.x Le Reste, A., Scarlata, C., Hayes, M. J., et al. 2025, ApJS, 280, 27, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/adf227

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14805.x 2009

  19. [19]

    K., Walter, F., Martini, P., et al

    Leroy, A. K., Walter, F., Martini, P., et al. 2015, ApJ, 814, 83, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/814/2/83

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/814/2/83 2015

  20. [20]

    2004, MNRAS, 354, 1165, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08275.x

    Maller, A. H., & Bullock, J. S. 2004, MNRAS, 355, 694, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08349.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08349.x 2004

  21. [21]

    McCourt, M., Sharma, P., Quataert, E., & Parrish, I. J. 2012, MNRAS, 419, 3319, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19972.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19972.x 2012

  22. [22]

    2023, ApJS, 266, 15, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acc2b8

    Melinder, J., ¨Ostlin, G., Hayes, M., et al. 2023, ApJS, 266, 15, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acc2b8

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/acc2b8 2023

  23. [23]

    2020, ApJ, 903, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abbdff

    Micheva, G., ¨Ostlin, G., Melinder, J., et al. 2020, ApJ, 903, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abbdff

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abbdff 2020

  24. [24]

    E., Christian, C

    Mutchler, M., Bond, H. E., Christian, C. A., et al. 2007, PASP, 119, 1, doi: 10.1086/511160

    work page doi:10.1086/511160 2007

  25. [25]

    S., Sawant, A

    Oey, M. S., Sawant, A. N., Danehkar, A., et al. 2023, ApJL, 958, L10, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad07dd ¨Ostlin, G., Hayes, M., Kunth, D., et al. 2009, AJ, 138, 923, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/138/3/923

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad07dd 2023

  26. [26]

    S., Werk, J

    Peeples, M. S., Werk, J. K., Tumlinson, J., et al. 2014, ApJ, 786, 54, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/786/1/54

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/786/1/54 2014

  27. [27]

    K., Kacprzak, G

    Pointon, S. K., Kacprzak, G. G., Nielsen, N. M., et al. 2019, ApJ, 883, 78, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3b0e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab3b0e 2019

  28. [28]

    X., Chen, H.-W., Howk, J

    Prochaska, J. X., Chen, H.-W., Howk, J. C., Weiner, B. J., & Mulchaey, J. 2004, ApJ, 617, 718, doi: 10.1086/425558

    work page doi:10.1086/425558 2004

  29. [29]

    X., Werk, J

    Prochaska, J. X., Werk, J. K., Worseck, G., et al. 2017, ApJ, 837, 169, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6007

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa6007 2017

  30. [30]

    D., et al

    Qu, Z., Chen, H.-W., Johnson, S. D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 968, 8, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad410b

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad410b 2024

  31. [31]

    2024, MNRAS, 528, 3320, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae237

    Ramesh, R., & Nelson, D. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 3320, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae237

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae237 2024

  32. [32]

    , keywords =

    Rudie, G. C., Steidel, C. C., Pettini, M., et al. 2019, ApJ, 885, 61, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4255

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4255 2019

  33. [33]

    , keywords =

    Runnholm, A., Hayes, M. J., Lin, Y.-H., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 522, 4275, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1264

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1264 2023

  34. [34]

    2025, FiCUS: FItting the stellar Continuum of Uv Spectra,, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2508.019 http://ascl.net/2508.019

    Saldana-Lopez, A., Schaerer, D., Chisholm, J., et al. 2025, FiCUS: FItting the stellar Continuum of Uv Spectra,, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2508.019 http://ascl.net/2508.019

    2025

  35. [35]

    D., Tripp, T

    Savage, B. D., Tripp, T. M., & Lu, L. 1998, AJ, 115, 436, doi: 10.1086/300222

    work page doi:10.1086/300222 1998

  36. [36]

    K., & Heckman, T

    Strickland, D. K., & Heckman, T. M. 2009, ApJ, 697, 2030, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/2030

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/0004-637x/697/2/2030 2009

  37. [37]

    M., Lu, L., & Savage, B

    Tripp, T. M., Lu, L., & Savage, B. D. 1998, ApJ, 508, 200, doi: 10.1086/306397

    work page doi:10.1086/306397 1998

  38. [38]

    S., & Werk, J

    Tumlinson, J., Peeples, M. S., & Werk, J. K. 2017, ARA&A, 55, 389, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055240

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055240 2017

  39. [39]

    K., Thom, C., et al

    Tumlinson, J., Werk, J. K., Thom, C., et al. 2011, ApJ, 733, 111, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/733/2/111

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/733/2/111 2011

  40. [40]

    K., & et al

    Tumlinson, J., Thom, C., Werk, J. K., et al. 2013, ApJ, 777, 59, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/777/1/59

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/777/1/59 2013

  41. [41]

    J., Chung, H., Hergenrother, C

    Vargas, C. J., Chung, H., Hergenrother, C. W., et al. 2025, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 11, 042216, doi: 10.1117/1.JATIS.11.4.042216

    work page doi:10.1117/1.jatis.11.4.042216 2025

  42. [42]

    M., Bryan, G

    Voit, G. M., Bryan, G. L., O’Shea, B. W., & Donahue, M. 2015, ApJL, 808, L30, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/808/1/L30

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/808/1/l30 2015

  43. [43]

    K., Prochaska, J

    Werk, J. K., Prochaska, J. X., Tumlinson, J., et al. 2014, ApJ, 792, 8, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/792/1/8

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/792/1/8 2014

  44. [44]

    K., Prochaska, J

    Werk, J. K., Prochaska, J. X., Cantalupo, S., et al. 2016, ApJ, 833, 54, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/54

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/54 2016

  45. [45]

    A., Faucher-Gigu` ere, C.-A., Stern, J., Byrne, L., & Sultan, I

    Wijers, N. A., Faucher-Gigu` ere, C.-A., Stern, J., Byrne, L., & Sultan, I. 2024, ApJ, 973, 99, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad63a0

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad63a0 2024

  46. [46]

    B., Lehner, N., Howk, J

    Wotta, C. B., Lehner, N., Howk, J. C., et al. 2019, ApJ, 872, 81, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aafb74

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aafb74 2019

  47. [47]

    S., Chen, H.-W., Cooper, T

    Zahedy, F. S., Chen, H.-W., Cooper, T. M., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 506, 877, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1661

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1661 2021