pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.00254 · v1 · pith:HK4TUGKZnew · submitted 2026-05-29 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.mes-hall· cond-mat.str-el· cs.SY· eess.SY

Symmetry-Protected Quantum Computing using Metamaterials

Neil F. Johnson , Ferney J. Rodriguez , Luis Quiroga This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 22:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.str-elcs.SYeess.SY
keywords quantum computingsymmetry protectionKohn theoremtwisted lightmetamaterialsparabolic confinementrelative-motion qubitsorbital angular momentum
0
0 comments X

The pith

Symmetry from the generalized Kohn theorem protects relative-motion qubits when combined with twisted-light control and metamaterial nanofocusing in any parabolic confinement system.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes an architecture that merges symmetry protection of relative-motion qubits through the generalized Kohn theorem, control via twisted-light orbital angular momentum, and metamaterial nanofocusing such as Weyl-semimetal plasmonics. This combination is claimed to enable practical quantum computing. The mechanism is presented as generic, applying to any system with parabolic confinement including cold atoms, ions, and semiconductor dots. A sympathetic reader would care because the approach leverages an existing symmetry to address decoherence while using established control and focusing techniques across multiple hardware platforms.

Core claim

The central claim is that the generalized Kohn theorem supplies symmetry protection for relative-motion qubits that remains usable when the system is driven by twisted light and subjected to metamaterial-induced field gradients, yielding a generic quantum computing architecture applicable to cold atoms, ions, and semiconductor dots.

What carries the argument

Symmetry protection of relative-motion qubits via the generalized Kohn theorem, combined with twisted-light orbital angular momentum control and metamaterial nanofocusing.

If this is right

  • The architecture applies without modification to cold atoms, ions, and semiconductor dots.
  • No new hardware platforms are required beyond existing parabolic confinement systems.
  • Control is achieved through established twisted-light orbital angular momentum and metamaterial plasmonics.
  • The relative-motion qubit encoding is preserved by the Kohn symmetry even with the added driving and gradients.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar symmetry protections might be identifiable in non-parabolic confinements if analogous theorems exist.
  • Integration into current experimental setups could be tested by adding twisted-light sources and metamaterial layers to existing traps.
  • The approach suggests a route to lower error rates by encoding information in relative rather than absolute motion across multiple particle types.

Load-bearing premise

The symmetry protection from the generalized Kohn theorem stays intact and useful under twisted-light driving and metamaterial field gradients without new decoherence channels or loss of the relative-motion qubit encoding.

What would settle it

Measuring loss of coherence or failure of the relative-motion encoding in a semiconductor quantum dot under simultaneous twisted-light illumination and metamaterial field gradients would show the protection does not survive the combined controls.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.00254 by Ferney J. Rodriguez, Luis Quiroga, Neil F. Johnson.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic of the symmetry-protected quantum-computing architecture. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose a new architecture for practical quantum computing that combines three established principles: symmetry protection of relative-motion qubits via the generalized Kohn theorem, control via twisted-light orbital angular momentum, and metamaterial nanofocusing (e.g. using Weyl-semimetal plasmonics). Crucially, the core mechanism is generic: it applies to any current or future quantum computing system involving parabolic confinement, including cold atoms, ions, and semiconductor dots.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a quantum computing architecture combining symmetry protection of relative-motion qubits via the generalized Kohn theorem, control via twisted-light orbital angular momentum, and metamaterial nanofocusing (e.g., Weyl-semimetal plasmonics). The central claim is that this symmetry-protected mechanism is generic and applies to any parabolic-confinement system, including cold atoms, ions, and semiconductor dots, even when subjected to twisted-light driving and metamaterial-induced field gradients.

Significance. If the decoupling of center-of-mass and relative motion survives the added perturbations, the approach could provide a cross-platform route to robust qubit encoding with reduced sensitivity to certain environmental couplings. The proposal usefully identifies a potential intersection of three established ideas, but the complete absence of any derivation, effective Hamiltonian, or symmetry analysis means the significance remains speculative and cannot yet be assessed against the stress-test concern that position-dependent forces from OAM phase gradients and plasmonic enhancements may generate leading-order CM-relative cross terms.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that 'the core mechanism is generic' and remains intact under twisted-light OAM and metamaterial gradients is unsupported. The generalized Kohn theorem guarantees decoupling only for harmonic confinement plus uniform or specially symmetric fields; the manuscript provides no effective two-body Hamiltonian, symmetry argument, or perturbative analysis showing that the azimuthal vector potential ~ r^l exp(i l ϕ) and spatially varying metamaterial enhancements do not introduce CM-relative coupling at leading order.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: no derivation, numerical simulation, or concrete example is given to demonstrate that the relative-motion qubit encoding survives the proposed driving and nanofocusing without new decoherence channels, leaving the central claim unevaluable.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract is overly dense; separating the three constituent principles and the genericity claim into distinct sentences would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed reading and for identifying the need for greater rigor in supporting the central claims. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate explicit supporting analysis.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that 'the core mechanism is generic' and remains intact under twisted-light OAM and metamaterial gradients is unsupported. The generalized Kohn theorem guarantees decoupling only for harmonic confinement plus uniform or specially symmetric fields; the manuscript provides no effective two-body Hamiltonian, symmetry argument, or perturbative analysis showing that the azimuthal vector potential ~ r^l exp(i l ϕ) and spatially varying metamaterial enhancements do not introduce CM-relative coupling at leading order.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes that the generalized Kohn theorem applies strictly to harmonic confinement plus uniform or symmetry-preserving fields. Our proposal rests on the observation that the leading azimuthal phase gradient of OAM light and the plasmonic enhancement profiles can be expanded such that their first-order contributions remain even under the relative-coordinate parity, thereby preserving decoupling at linear order. We agree, however, that the manuscript does not supply the required effective two-body Hamiltonian or perturbative expansion. In the revised version we will add a dedicated section deriving the leading-order CM-relative cross terms and demonstrating their vanishing under the stated symmetries. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: no derivation, numerical simulation, or concrete example is given to demonstrate that the relative-motion qubit encoding survives the proposed driving and nanofocusing without new decoherence channels, leaving the central claim unevaluable.

    Authors: As a concise proposal the manuscript emphasizes the architectural intersection rather than exhaustive calculations. We maintain that symmetry protection precludes new leading-order decoherence channels, yet we accept that this assertion requires explicit justification. The revision will include a short symmetry-based argument showing suppression of additional channels together with a concrete example (semiconductor quantum dots under parabolic confinement) that illustrates the absence of new relative-motion couplings at the relevant field strengths. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: proposal combines external principles without self-referential derivations

full rationale

The manuscript presents an architectural proposal that invokes the generalized Kohn theorem, twisted-light OAM, and metamaterial effects as established external ingredients. No equations, fitted parameters, or predictions are shown that reduce by construction to the paper's own inputs. The generality claim is stated as a direct consequence of the cited theorem's applicability to parabolic systems, without any internal fitting or renaming that would create circularity. Self-citations, if present, are not load-bearing for any derivation chain. The absence of any explicit Hamiltonian derivation or numerical prediction in the provided text confirms the result is not forced by self-definition.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5604 in / 999 out tokens · 19897 ms · 2026-06-28T22:01:43.884029+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Optical and magneto-optical absorption in parabolic quantum wells,

    L. Brey, N. F. Johnson, and B. I. Halperin, “Optical and magneto-optical absorption in parabolic quantum wells,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 40, pp. 10647– 10649, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.40.10647

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.40.10647 1989

  2. [2]

    Collective Modes in Quantum Dot Arrays in Magnetic Fields,

    J. Dempsey, N. F. Johnson, L. Brey and B. I. Halperin, “Collective Modes in Quantum Dot Arrays in Magnetic Fields,”Phys. Rev. Bvol. 42, pp. 11708, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.42.11708

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.42.11708 1990

  3. [3]

    Spatial Correlation of Quan- tum Dot Electrons in a Magnetic Field,

    L. Quiroga, D. Ardila and N.F. Johnson, “Spatial Correlation of Quan- tum Dot Electrons in a Magnetic Field,”Solid State Comm.vol. 86, pp. 775, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-1098(93)90107-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0038-1098(93)90107-x 1993

  4. [4]

    Analytic results for N particles with inverse-square interaction in two dimensions and an external magnetic field,

    N. F. Johnson and L. Quiroga, “Analytic results for N particles with inverse-square interaction in two dimensions and an external magnetic field,”Phys. Rev. Lett.vol. 74, pp. 4277, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.74.4277

    1995

  5. [5]

    Electronic structure of quantum dots,

    S. M. Reimann and M. Manninen, “Electronic structure of quantum dots,”Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 74, pp. 1283–1342, 2002. https://doi.org/ 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.1283

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.1283 2002

  6. [6]

    Coherent manipulation of electronic states in a double quantum dot,

    T. Hayashi, T. Fujisawa, H. D. Cheong, Y . H. Jeong, and Y . Hirayama, “Coherent manipulation of electronic states in a double quantum dot,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 91, p. 226804, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.91.226804

    2003

  7. [7]

    Emergence of Compositional Representations in Restricted Boltzmann Machines

    K. D. Petersson, J. R. Petta, H. Lu, and A. C. Gossard, “Quantum coherence in a one-electron semiconductor charge qubit,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 105, p. 246804, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 105.246804

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett 2010

  8. [8]

    Transfer of optical orbital angular momentum to a bound electron,

    C. T. Schmiegelow et al., “Transfer of optical orbital angular momentum to a bound electron,”Nat. Commun., vol. 7, p. 12998, 2016. https://doi. org/10.1038/ncomms12998 META 2026, DUBLIN – IRELAND, JULY 14 – 17, 2026

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms12998 2016

  9. [9]

    A decoherence-free subspace in a charge quadrupole qubit,

    M. Friesen, J. Ghosh, M. A. Eriksson, and S. N. Coppersmith, “A decoherence-free subspace in a charge quadrupole qubit,”Nat. Commun., vol. 8, p. 15923, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15923

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms15923 2017

  10. [10]

    Strong photon coupling to the quadrupole moment of an electron in a solid-state qubit,

    J. V . Koski, A. J. Landig, M. Russ, J. C. Abadillo-Uriel, P. Scar- lino, B. Kratochwil, C. Reichl, S. N. Coppersmith, W. Wegscheider, M. Friesen, A. Wallraff, T. Ihn, and K. Ensslin, “Strong photon coupling to the quadrupole moment of an electron in a solid-state qubit,”Nat. Phys., vol. 16, pp. 642–646, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41567-020-0824-3

    2020

  11. [11]

    Light control with Weyl semimetals,

    C. Guo, V . S. Asadchy, B. Zhao, and S. Fan, “Light control with Weyl semimetals,”eLight, vol. 3, p. 2, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s43593-022-00036-w

    2023

  12. [12]

    Twisted light drives chiral excitations of interacting electrons in nanostructures with magnetic field,

    F. J. Rodr ´ıguez, L. Quiroga, and N. F. Johnson, “Twisted light drives chiral excitations of interacting electrons in nanostructures with magnetic field,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 112, p. 115115, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevB.112.115115

    2025

  13. [13]

    Twisted light generates robust many-body states for practical quantum computing,

    F. J. Rodr ´ıguez, L. Quiroga, and N. F. Johnson, “Twisted light generates robust many-body states for practical quantum computing,”APS Open Sci., vol. 1, p. 000023, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1103/f4qc-3ckt

    work page doi:10.1103/f4qc-3ckt 2026

  14. [14]

    Angular- momentum-selective nanofocusing with Weyl semimetals,

    M. Peluso, A. De Martino, R. Egger, and F. Buccheri, “Angular- momentum-selective nanofocusing with Weyl semimetals,”Phys. Rev. Research, vol. 7, p. 043121, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1103/8c99-rvmm

    work page doi:10.1103/8c99-rvmm 2025

  15. [15]

    Two-electron dephasing in single Si and GaAs quantum dots,

    J. K. Gamble, M. Friesen, S. N. Coppersmith, and X. Hu, “Two-electron dephasing in single Si and GaAs quantum dots,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 86, p. 035302, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.86.035302

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.86.035302 2012

  16. [16]

    Coherent manipulation of coupled electron spins in semiconductor quantum dots,

    J. R. Petta et al., “Coherent manipulation of coupled electron spins in semiconductor quantum dots,”Science, vol. 309, pp. 2180–2184, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1116955

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1116955 2005

  17. [17]

    Reduced sensitivity to charge noise in semicon- ductor spin qubits via symmetric operation,

    M. D. Reed et al., “Reduced sensitivity to charge noise in semicon- ductor spin qubits via symmetric operation,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 116, p. 110402, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.110402

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.110402 2016

  18. [18]

    Noise suppression using symmetric exchange gates in spin qubits,

    F. Martins et al., “Noise suppression using symmetric exchange gates in spin qubits,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 116, p. 116801, 2016. https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.116801

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.116801 2016

  19. [19]

    Noiseless quantum codes,

    P. Zanardi and M. Rasetti, “Noiseless quantum codes,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 79, pp. 3306–3309, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.79. 3306

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.79 1997

  20. [20]

    Decoherence-free subspaces and sub- systems,

    D. A. Lidar and K. B. Whaley, “Decoherence-free subspaces and sub- systems,” inIrreversible Quantum Dynamics, Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 622, pp. 83–120, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44874-8 5

    work page doi:10.1007/3-540-44874-8 2003

  21. [21]

    Coherence-preserving quantum bits,

    D. Bacon, K. R. Brown, and K. B. Whaley, “Coherence-preserving quantum bits,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 87, p. 247902, 2001. https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.247902

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.87.247902 2001

  22. [22]

    Theory of decoherence-free fault-tolerant universal quantum computation,

    J. Kempe, D. Bacon, D. A. Lidar, and K. B. Whaley, “Theory of decoherence-free fault-tolerant universal quantum computation,”Phys. Rev. A, vol. 63, p. 042307, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.63. 042307

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.63 2001

  23. [23]

    Phonon- induced decoherence of a charge quadrupole qubit,

    V . Kornich, M. G. Vavilov, M. Friesen, and S. N. Coppersmith, “Phonon- induced decoherence of a charge quadrupole qubit,”New J. Phys., vol. 20, p. 103048, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aae3b4

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aae3b4 2018

  24. [24]

    Charge qubit in a triple quantum dot with tunable coherence,

    B. Kratochwil et al., “Charge qubit in a triple quantum dot with tunable coherence,”Phys. Rev. Research, vol. 3, p. 013171, 2021. https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.013171

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.013171 2021

  25. [25]

    Quadrupolar exchange-only spin qubit,

    M. Russ, J. R. Petta, and G. Burkard, “Quadrupolar exchange-only spin qubit,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 121, p. 177701, 2018. https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.121.177701

    2018

  26. [26]

    Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre- Gaussian laser modes,

    L. Allen, M. W. Beijersbergen, R. J. C. Spreeuw, and J. P. Woerdman, “Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre- Gaussian laser modes,”Phys. Rev. A, vol. 45, pp. 8185–8189, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.45.8185

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.45.8185 1992

  27. [27]

    Electric currents induced by twisted light in quantum rings,

    G. F. Quinteiro and J. Berakdar, “Electric currents induced by twisted light in quantum rings,”Opt. Express, vol. 17, pp. 20465–20475, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.17.020465

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.17.020465 2009

  28. [28]

    Electronic transitions in disc- shaped quantum dots induced by twisted light,

    G. F. Quinteiro and P. I. Tamborenea, “Electronic transitions in disc- shaped quantum dots induced by twisted light,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 79, p. 155450, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.155450

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.79.155450 2009

  29. [29]

    Levy and R

    G. F. Quinteiro and P. I. Tamborenea, “Theory of the optical absorption of light carrying orbital angular momentum by semiconductors,”Euro- phys. Lett., vol. 85, p. 47001, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/ 85/47001

    work page doi:10.1209/0295-5075/ 2009

  30. [30]

    Twisted-light-induced intersubband transitions in quantum wells at normal incidence,

    B. Sbierski et al., “Twisted-light-induced intersubband transitions in quantum wells at normal incidence,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 88, p. 235138,

  31. [31]

    https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.88.235138

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.88.235138

  32. [32]

    Electronic transitions in quantum dots and rings induced by inhomogeneous off- centered light beams,

    G. F. Quinteiro, A. O. Lucero, and P. I. Tamborenea, “Electronic transitions in quantum dots and rings induced by inhomogeneous off- centered light beams,”J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, vol. 22, p. 505802,

  33. [33]

    https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/22/50/505802

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-8984/22/50/505802

  34. [34]

    Formulation of the twisted-light–matter interaction at the phase singularity: beams with strong magnetic fields,

    G. F. Quinteiro, D. E. Reiter, and T. Kuhn, “Formulation of the twisted-light–matter interaction at the phase singularity: beams with strong magnetic fields,”Phys. Rev. A, vol. 95, p. 012106, 2017. https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.95.012106

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.95.012106 2017

  35. [35]

    Magnetic-optical transitions induced by twisted light in quantum dots,

    G. F. Quinteiro, D. E. Reiter, and T. Kuhn, “Magnetic-optical transitions induced by twisted light in quantum dots,”J. Phys.: Conf. Ser ., vol. 906, p. 012014, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/906/1/012014

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/906/1/012014 2017

  36. [36]

    Centrifugal photovoltaic and photogalvanic effects driven by structured light,

    J. W ¨atzel and J. Berakdar, “Centrifugal photovoltaic and photogalvanic effects driven by structured light,”Sci. Rep., vol. 6, p. 21475, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21475

    work page doi:10.1038/srep21475 2016

  37. [37]

    Experimental verification of position-dependent angular-momentum selection rules for absorption of twisted light by a bound electron,

    A. Afanasev, C. E. Carlson, C. T. Schmiegelow, J. Schulz, F. Schmidt- Kaler and M. Solyanik, “Experimental verification of position-dependent angular-momentum selection rules for absorption of twisted light by a bound electron,”New J. Phys., vol. 20, p. 023032, 2018. https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1367-2630/aaa63d

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aaa63d 2018

  38. [38]

    Orbital angular momentum: origins, behavior and applications,

    A. M. Yao and M. J. Padgett, “Orbital angular momentum: origins, behavior and applications,”Adv. Opt. Photon., vol. 3, pp. 161–204, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1364/AOP.3.000161

    work page doi:10.1364/aop.3.000161 2011

  39. [39]

    Quantumcommunicationwithoutthenecessityofquantummemories,

    J. Wang, J.-Y . Yang, I. M. Fazal, N. Ahmed, Y . Yan, H. Huang, Y . Ren, Y . Yue, S. Dolinar, M. Tur, and A. E. Willner, “Terabit free-space data transmission employing orbital angular momentum multiplexing,”Nat. Photonics, vol. 6, pp. 488–496, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton. 2012.138

    work page doi:10.1038/nphoton 2012

  40. [40]

    Twisted light transmission over 143 km,

    M. Krenn, J. Handsteiner, M. Fink, R. Fickler, R. Ursin, M. Malik, and A. Zeilinger, “Twisted light transmission over 143 km,”Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., vol. 113, pp. 13648–13653, 2016. https://doi.org/10. 1073/pnas.1612023113

    2016

  41. [41]

    Orbital angular momentum of light for communications,

    A. E. Willner, K. Pang, H. Song, K. Zou, and H. Zhou, “Orbital angular momentum of light for communications,”Appl. Phys. Rev., vol. 8, p. 041312, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0054885

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0054885 2021

  42. [42]

    Twisted photons: new quantum perspectives in high dimensions,

    M. Erhard, R. Fickler, M. Krenn, and A. Zeilinger, “Twisted photons: new quantum perspectives in high dimensions,”Light Sci. Appl., vol. 7, p. 17146, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1038/lsa.2017.146

    work page doi:10.1038/lsa.2017.146 2018

  43. [43]

    Twisted nonlinear optics in monolayer van der Waals crystals,

    T. Norden, L. M. Martinez, N. Tarefder, K. W. C. Kwock, L. M. McClin- tock, N. Olsen, L. N. Holtzman, J. H. Yeo, L. Zhao, X. Zhu, J. C. Hone, J. Yoo, J.-X. Zhu, P. J. Schuck, A. J. Taylor, R. P. Prasankumar, W. J. M. Kort-Kamp, and P. Padmanabhan, “Twisted nonlinear optics in monolayer van der Waals crystals,”ACS Nano, vol. 19, pp. 30919– 30929, 2025. htt...

    work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.5c06908 2025

  44. [44]

    Optical control over bulk excitations in fractional quantum Hall systems,

    T. Grass, B. Juli ´a-D´ıaz, N. Barber ´an, and M. Lewenstein, “Optical control over bulk excitations in fractional quantum Hall systems,”Phys. Rev. A, vol. 98, p. 043628, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.98. 043628

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.98 2018

  45. [45]

    Charge and statistics of lattice quasiholes from density measurements: a tree tensor network study,

    E. Macaluso, T. Comparin, R. O. Umucalilar, M. Gerster, L. Mazza, M. Rizzi, S. Montangero, and I. Carusotto, “Charge and statistics of lattice quasiholes from density measurements: a tree tensor network study,”Phys. Rev. Research, vol. 2, p. 013145, 2020. https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013145

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.013145 2020

  46. [46]

    Engineering quantum control with twisted-light fields induced optical transitions,

    I. Beterov et al., “Engineering quantum control with twisted-light fields induced optical transitions,” arXiv:2306.17620, 2023. https://arxiv.org/ abs/2306.17620

    arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    Superconducting qubit without Joseph- son junctions manipulated by the orbital angular momentum of light,

    S.-Y . Lee, K. Kim, and J. Lim, “Superconducting qubit without Joseph- son junctions manipulated by the orbital angular momentum of light,” arXiv:1505.04257, 2015. https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.04257

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  48. [48]

    Realization of a fractional quantum Hall state with ultracold atoms,

    J. L ´eonard, S. Kim, J. Kwan, P. Segura, F. Grusdt, C. Repellin, N. Goldman, and M. Greiner, “Realization of a fractional quantum Hall state with ultracold atoms,”Nature, vol. 619, pp. 495–499, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06122-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06122-4 2023

  49. [49]

    Realization of a Laughlin state of two rapidly rotating fermions,

    P. Lunt, P. Hill, J. Reiter, P. M. Preiss, M. Gałka, and S. Jochim, “Realization of a Laughlin state of two rapidly rotating fermions,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 133, pp. 253401, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.133.253401

    2024

  50. [50]

    Bulk density signatures of a lattice quasihole with very few particles,

    R. O. Umucalilar, “Bulk density signatures of a lattice quasihole with very few particles,” arXiv:2309.00604, 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2309. 00604

    arXiv 2023

  51. [51]

    Adiabatic path to fractional quantum Hall states of a few bosonic atoms,

    M. Popp, B. Paredes, and J. I. Cirac, “Adiabatic path to fractional quantum Hall states of a few bosonic atoms,”Phys. Rev. A, vol. 70, p. 053612, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.70.053612

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.70.053612 2004

  52. [52]

    Topological growing of Laughlin states in synthetic gauge fields,

    F. Grusdt, F. Letscher, M. Hafezi, and M. Fleischhauer, “Topological growing of Laughlin states in synthetic gauge fields,”Phys. Rev. Lett., META 2026, DUBLIN – IRELAND, JULY 14 – 17, 2026 vol. 113, p. 155301, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113. 155301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113 2026

  53. [53]

    Continuous preparation of a fractional Chern insulator,

    M. Barkeshli, N. Y . Yao, and C. R. Laumann, “Continuous preparation of a fractional Chern insulator,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 115, p. 026802,

  54. [54]

    https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.026802

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.026802

  55. [55]

    Creating a bosonic frac- tional quantum Hall state by pairing fermions,

    C. Repellin, T. Yefsah, and A. Sterdyniak, “Creating a bosonic frac- tional quantum Hall state by pairing fermions,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 96, p. 161111, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.161111

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.96.161111 2017

  56. [56]

    Optimal control for preparing fractional quantum Hall states in optical lattices,

    M. Lacki et al., “Optimal control for preparing fractional quantum Hall states in optical lattices,” arXiv:2501.10720, 2025. https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2501.10720

    arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    S. A. Maier,Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications. New York: Springer, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-37825-1

    work page doi:10.1007/0-387-37825-1 2007

  58. [58]

    Nanofocusing of optical energy in tapered plasmonic waveguides,

    M. I. Stockman, “Nanofocusing of optical energy in tapered plasmonic waveguides,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 93, p. 137404, 2004. https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.137404

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.137404 2004

  59. [59]

    Surface plasmon polaritons in topo- logical Weyl semimetals,

    J. Hofmann and S. Das Sarma, “Surface plasmon polaritons in topo- logical Weyl semimetals,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 93, p. 241402(R), 2016. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.241402

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.93.241402 2016

  60. [60]

    Nonreciprocal Weyl semimetal waveguide,

    M. Peluso, A. De Martino, R. Egger, and F. Buccheri, “Nonreciprocal Weyl semimetal waveguide,”Phys. Rev. Research, vol. 7, p. 023195,

  61. [61]

    https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.7.023195

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.7.023195