pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.01146 · v1 · pith:6CDNAJVXnew · submitted 2026-05-31 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.atom-ph

Most Subradiant Bound Photon Pairs from Chirality-Mediated Dispersion Softening

Kailin Tan , Xuanbing Jiang , Dong Wang , Saijun Wu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 17:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.atom-ph
keywords subradiant bound stateschiral couplingone-dimensional waveguideatom arraydispersion softeningbound photon pairstwo-excitation statesnanofiber interface
0
0 comments X

The pith

Chiral coupling in atom arrays drives bound photon pairs to become the most subradiant two-excitation states by softening dispersion and suppressing band curvature.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines bound states of photon pairs in arrays of two-level atoms coupled chirally to a one-dimensional waveguide. It shows that this chiral interaction distorts the energy band of these bound states in a way that reduces the curvature at certain points. This reduction leads to a decay rate that scales as the curvature divided by the cube of the number of atoms, making these states decay much slower than others. A sympathetic reader would care because subradiant states are key to controlling light-matter interactions at the quantum level, potentially enabling better storage or manipulation of photon pairs without unwanted emission. The work also confirms such states can appear in practical setups like atom-nanofiber interfaces.

Core claim

The authors demonstrate that the chiral interaction can drive bound states (BSs) to become the most subradiant two-excitation states across a wide spacing range. This is rooted in a mechanism of chirality-mediated dispersion softening, where the BS band distortion suppresses the band curvature |α₂| at an extremum point. They rigorously prove that the BS decay rate follows the scaling Γ ∼ |α₂|/N³, revealing that the reduction of |α₂| is key to suppressing emission and enhancing subradiance. They also show the existence of chiral BSs in a realistic nanofiber interface.

What carries the argument

Chirality-mediated dispersion softening: the distortion of the bound-state band by chiral coupling that suppresses its curvature |α₂| at an extremum point.

If this is right

  • Bound states achieve the lowest decay rates among two-excitation states over a broad range of atom spacings.
  • The decay rate of these states scales proportionally to |α₂| divided by N cubed.
  • Reduction of |α₂| through band distortion is the controlling factor for enhanced subradiance.
  • Chiral bound states can be realized in realistic atom-nanofiber waveguide interfaces.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The N³ scaling implies that maintaining small |α₂| in larger arrays could produce substantially longer-lived photon-pair states.
  • The softening mechanism may extend to designing subradiant states in other chiral light-matter platforms.
  • Experimental tests in nanofiber systems could directly verify the predicted dependence of lifetime on curvature.

Load-bearing premise

The model assumes that chiral coupling produces band distortion that suppresses |α₂| at an extremum point without other decay channels or non-chiral effects dominating the two-excitation dynamics.

What would settle it

Measuring the decay rate Γ of bound states for varying array sizes N and checking whether it scales as |α₂|/N³, or directly mapping the band curvature |α₂| to confirm minimization exactly where subradiance is strongest.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.01146 by Dong Wang, Kailin Tan, Saijun Wu, Xuanbing Jiang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Schematic of the chiral waveguide QED model. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Decay rates of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Schematic of an atom array coupled to a cylin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study the subradiant bound states (BSs) in a two-level atom array chirally coupled to a one-dimensional waveguide. We demonstrate that the chiral interaction can drive BSs to become the most subradiant two-excitation states across a wide spacing range. This phenomenon is rooted in a mechanism of chirality-mediated dispersion softening, where the BS band distortion suppresses the band curvature $|\alpha_2|$ at an extremum point. We rigorously prove that the BS decay rate follows the scaling $\Gamma \sim |\alpha_2|/N^3$, revealing that the reduction of $|\alpha_2|$ is key to suppressing emission and enhancing subradiance. We also show the existence of chiral BSs in a realistic nanofiber interface.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies subradiant bound states (BSs) formed by two excitations in a chain of two-level atoms chirally coupled to a 1D waveguide. It claims that chirality induces dispersion softening that suppresses the quadratic band curvature |α₂| at an extremum, thereby rendering the BSs the most subradiant two-excitation states over a broad range of interatomic spacings. A rigorous proof is asserted that the collective decay rate obeys the scaling Γ ∼ |α₂|/N³, with the reduction of |α₂| identified as the mechanism for enhanced subradiance; the work also reports the existence of such chiral BSs at a realistic nanofiber interface.

Significance. If the scaling relation and its applicability in the |α₂|→0 limit are established, the result would identify a concrete, chirality-driven route to stronger two-photon subradiance without additional tuning parameters. The explicit scaling law and the focus on two-excitation bound states constitute clear strengths that could guide waveguide-QED experiments.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the asserted rigorous proof that Γ ∼ |α₂|/N³ is obtained from a quadratic dispersion expansion near the band extremum. The central mechanism, however, drives |α₂| to zero; in that limit the leading term becomes quartic (or higher), and the Fourier integral over the collective decay kernel is expected to yield a different power (commonly ∼1/N⁵). The manuscript gives no indication that the derivation or supporting numerics were repeated after the quadratic coefficient vanishes.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: no derivation steps, error estimates, or explicit verification (analytic or numeric) of the scaling are supplied, leaving the load-bearing claim that the 1/N³ factor survives the softening mechanism unverifiable from the given text.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the effect holds “across a wide spacing range” but does not quantify the range or the residual |α₂| values achieved.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on the scaling relation. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the asserted rigorous proof that Γ ∼ |α₂|/N³ is obtained from a quadratic dispersion expansion near the band extremum. The central mechanism, however, drives |α₂| to zero; in that limit the leading term becomes quartic (or higher), and the Fourier integral over the collective decay kernel is expected to yield a different power (commonly ∼1/N⁵). The manuscript gives no indication that the derivation or supporting numerics were repeated after the quadratic coefficient vanishes.

    Authors: The derivation of Γ ∼ |α₂|/N³ assumes the quadratic term is the leading contribution in the dispersion expansion near the extremum. Chirality-mediated softening substantially reduces |α₂| (thereby enhancing subradiance) but does not drive it exactly to zero in the finite-parameter regimes we consider; the quadratic term therefore remains dominant. We agree that the strict |α₂|→0 limit would require a higher-order analysis and that the manuscript does not explicitly address this. We will add a dedicated discussion of the |α₂|→0 case, including the expected change in scaling, together with additional analytic estimates and numerical checks performed after the quadratic coefficient is suppressed. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: no derivation steps, error estimates, or explicit verification (analytic or numeric) of the scaling are supplied, leaving the load-bearing claim that the 1/N³ factor survives the softening mechanism unverifiable from the given text.

    Authors: The abstract states the scaling result without steps, as is conventional. The full manuscript presents the derivation, but we accept that the presentation lacks sufficient detail, error estimates, and direct verification for the softened-dispersion regime. We will expand the main text (or supplementary material) with the explicit steps of the Fourier-integral evaluation, bounds on higher-order corrections, and side-by-side analytic/numeric confirmation that the 1/N³ factor persists when |α₂| is reduced but nonzero. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: scaling derivation is model-derived and independent of the chirality mechanism

full rationale

The paper states it 'rigorously prove[s]' the scaling Γ ∼ |α₂|/N³ from the underlying collective decay kernel and band structure. This is a standard quadratic-dispersion integral result applied to the BS band; the chirality-mediated softening that reduces |α₂| is a separate dynamical effect within the same Hamiltonian and does not redefine or fit the scaling itself. No self-citation load-bearing steps, no fitted inputs renamed as predictions, and no ansatz smuggled via prior work are present in the provided text. The derivation chain remains self-contained against the model's equations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms listed. The central claim rests on standard domain assumptions of chiral waveguide QED.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Two-level atoms with chiral coupling to 1D waveguide support bound states whose dispersion can be softened by chirality.
    Invoked throughout the abstract as the foundation for the BS band distortion.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5658 in / 1090 out tokens · 22108 ms · 2026-06-28T17:05:20.780710+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    The dash-dotted pink lines denote the analytical scaling of the FS decay rates

    (c) Decay rate scaling ofBSe (blue) andFS(red) with respect to the atom numberNfor three differentη LR values at a fixed spacingd= 0.15λ 0. The dash-dotted pink lines denote the analytical scaling of the FS decay rates. Finally, the numerical results in Fig. 2(c) (evaluated at 4 d= 0.15λ 0) confirm that the BS decay rates follow the Γ∼N −3 scaling for suf...

  2. [2]

    R. H. Dicke, Coherence in spontaneous radiation pro- cesses, Phys. Rev.93, 99 (1954)

    1954

  3. [3]

    D. E. Chang, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum nonlinear optics—photon by photon, Nat. Photonics8, 685 (2014)

    2014

  4. [4]

    Chang, J

    D. Chang, J. Douglas, A. González-Tudela, C.-L. Hung, and H. Kimble, Colloquium: Quantum matter built from nanoscopic lattices of atoms and photons, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 031002 (2018)

    2018

  5. [5]

    González-Tudela, A

    A. González-Tudela, A. Reiserer, J. J. García-Ripoll, and F. J. García-Vidal, Light–matter interactions in quantum nanophotonic devices, Nat. Rev. Phys.6, 166 (2024)

    2024

  6. [6]

    Schrinski, M

    B. Schrinski, M. Lamaison, and A. S. Sørensen, Passive quantum phase gate for photons based on three level emitters, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 130502 (2022)

    2022

  7. [7]

    Levy-Yeyati, C

    T. Levy-Yeyati, C. Vega, T. Ramos, and A. González- Tudela, Passive photonic cz gate with two-level emitters in chiral multimode waveguide qed, PRX Quantum6, 010342 (2025)

    2025

  8. [8]

    A. S. Prasad, J. Hinney, S. Mahmoodian, K. Hammerer, S. Rind, P. Schneeweiss, A. S. Sørensen, J. Volz, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Correlating photons using the collec- tive nonlinear response of atoms weakly coupled to an optical mode, Nat. Photonics14, 719 (2020)

    2020

  9. [9]

    Z.-G. Lu, Y. Wu, and X.-Y. Lü, Chiral interaction in- duced near-perfect photon blockade, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 013602 (2025)

    2025

  10. [10]

    selec- tive radiance

    A. Asenjo-Garcia, M. Moreno-Cardoner, A. Albrecht, 6 H. Kimble, and D. E. Chang, Exponential improvement in photon storage fidelities using subradiance and “selec- tive radiance” in atomic arrays, Phys. Rev. X7, 031024 (2017)

    2017

  11. [11]

    Perczel, J

    J. Perczel, J. Borregaard, D. E. Chang, H. Pichler, S. F. Yelin, P. Zoller, and M. D. Lukin, Topological quantum optics in two-dimensional atomic arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 023603 (2017)

    2017

  12. [12]

    J. A. Needham, I. Lesanovsky, and B. Olmos, Subradiance-protected excitation transport, New J. Phys.21, 073061 (2019)

    2019

  13. [13]

    J. Rui, D. Wei, A. Rubio-Abadal, S. Hollerith, J. Zeiher, D. M. Stamper-Kurn, C. Gross, and I. Bloch, A subradi- ant optical mirror formed by a single structured atomic layer, Nature583, 369 (2020)

    2020

  14. [14]

    Moreno-Cardoner, D

    M. Moreno-Cardoner, D. Goncalves, and D. E. Chang, Quantum nonlinear optics based on two-dimensional ry- dberg atom arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 263602 (2021)

    2021

  15. [15]

    F. Shah, T. L. Patti, O. Rubies-Bigorda, and S. F. Yelin, Quantum computing with subwavelength atomic arrays, Phys. Rev. A109, 012613 (2024)

    2024

  16. [16]

    D. E. Chang, L. Jiang, A. Gorshkov, and H. Kimble, Cavity qed with atomic mirrors, New J. Phys.14, 063003 (2012)

    2012

  17. [17]

    Paulisch, H

    V. Paulisch, H. Kimble, and A. González-Tudela, Univer- sal quantum computation in waveguide qed using deco- herence free subspaces, New J. Phys.18, 043041 (2016)

    2016

  18. [18]

    Asenjo-Garcia, J

    A. Asenjo-Garcia, J. Hood, D. Chang, and H. Kimble, Atom-light interactions in quasi-one-dimensional nanos- tructures: A green’s-function perspective, Phys. Rev. A 95, 033818 (2017)

    2017

  19. [19]

    N. V. Corzo, J. Raskop, A. Chandra, A. S. Sheremet, B. Gouraud, and J. Laurat, Waveguide-coupled single collective excitation of atomic arrays, Nature566, 359 (2019)

    2019

  20. [20]

    Ðorđević, P

    T. Ðorđević, P. Samutpraphoot, P. L. Ocola, H. Bernien, B. Grinkemeyer, I. Dimitrova, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Entanglement transport and a nanophotonic in- terface for atoms in optical tweezers, Science373, 1511 (2021)

    2021

  21. [21]

    A. S. Sheremet, M. I. Petrov, I. V. Iorsh, A. V. Poshakin- skiy, and A. N. Poddubny, Waveguide quantum electro- dynamics: Collective radiance and photon-photon corre- lations, Rev. Mod. Phys.95, 015002 (2023)

    2023

  22. [22]

    Tabares, A

    C. Tabares, A. Muñoz de Las Heras, L. Tagliacozzo, D. Porras, and A. González-Tudela, Variational quantum simulatorsbasedonwaveguideqed,Phys.Rev.Lett.131, 073602 (2023)

    2023

  23. [23]

    Sunami, S

    S. Sunami, S. Tamiya, R. Inoue, H. Yamasaki, and A. Goban, Scalable networking of neutral-atom qubits: Nanofiber-based approach for multiprocessor fault-tolerant quantum computers, PRX Quantum6, 010101 (2025)

    2025

  24. [24]

    S. L. Moore, H. Y. Lee, N. Rivera, Y. Karube, M. Zif- fer, E. S. Yanev, T. P. Darlington, A. J. Sternbach, M. A. Holbrook, J. Pack,et al., Van der waals waveg- uide quantum electrodynamics probed by infrared nano- photoluminescence, Nat. Photonics19, 833 (2025)

    2025

  25. [25]

    Zhang and K

    Y.-X. Zhang and K. Mølmer, Free-fermion multiply ex- cited eigenstates and their experimental signatures in 1d arrays of two-level atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 093602 (2022)

    2022

  26. [26]

    Albrecht, L

    A. Albrecht, L. Henriet, A. Asenjo-Garcia, P. B. Dieterle, O. Painter, and D. E. Chang, Subradiant states of quan- tum bits coupled to a one-dimensional waveguide, New J. Phys.21, 025003 (2019)

    2019

  27. [27]

    Henriet, J

    L. Henriet, J. S. Douglas, D. E. Chang, and A. Albrecht, Critical open-system dynamics in a one-dimensional optical-lattice clock, Phys. Rev. A99, 023802 (2019)

    2019

  28. [28]

    Zhang and K

    Y.-X. Zhang and K. Mølmer, Theory of subradiant states of a one-dimensional two-level atom chain, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 203605 (2019)

    2019

  29. [29]

    Mahmoodian, G

    S. Mahmoodian, G. Calajó, D. E. Chang, K. Hammerer, and A. S. Sørensen, Dynamics of many-body photon bound states in chiral waveguide qed, Phys. Rev. X10, 031011 (2020)

    2020

  30. [30]

    Calajo and D

    G. Calajo and D. E. Chang, Emergence of solitons from many-body photon bound states in quantum nonlinear media, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 023026 (2022)

    2022

  31. [31]

    Bakkensen, Y.-X

    B. Bakkensen, Y.-X. Zhang, J. Bjerlin, and A. S. Sørensen, Photonic bound states and scattering reso- nances in waveguide qed, arXiv:2110.06093 (2021)

    work page arXiv 2021

  32. [32]

    Schrinski and A

    B. Schrinski and A. S. Sørensen, Polariton dynamics in one-dimensional arrays of atoms coupled to waveguides, New J. Phys.24, 123023 (2022)

    2022

  33. [33]

    Bound, antibound and resonance two-photon states in chiral waveguide QED

    A. Poddubny, Bound, antibound and resonance two- photon states in chiral waveguide qed, arXiv:2604.20602 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  34. [34]

    Zhang, C

    Y.-X. Zhang, C. Yu, and K. Mølmer, Subradiant bound dimer excited states of emitter chains coupled to a one dimensionalwaveguide,Phys.Rev.Res.2,013173(2020)

    2020

  35. [35]

    A.N.Poddubny,Quasiflatbandenablingsubradianttwo- photon bound states, Phys. Rev. A101, 043845 (2020)

    2020

  36. [36]

    Mitsch, C

    R. Mitsch, C. Sayrin, B. Albrecht, P. Schneeweiss, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Quantum state-controlled directional spontaneous emission of photons into a nanophotonic waveguide, Nat. Commun.5, 5713 (2014)

    2014

  37. [37]

    Pichler, T

    H. Pichler, T. Ramos, A. J. Daley, and P. Zoller, Quan- tum optics of chiral spin networks, Phys. Rev. A91, 042116 (2015)

    2015

  38. [38]

    N. V. Corzo, B. Gouraud, A. Chandra, A. Goban, A. S. Sheremet, D. V. Kupriyanov, and J. Laurat, Large bragg reflection from one-dimensional chains of trapped atoms nearananoscalewaveguide,Phys.Rev.Lett.117,133603 (2016)

    2016

  39. [39]

    Le Kien and A

    F. Le Kien and A. Rauschenbeutel, Nanofiber-mediated chiral radiative coupling between two atoms, Phys. Rev. A95, 023838 (2017)

    2017

  40. [40]

    Jones, G

    R. Jones, G. Buonaiuto, B. Lang, I. Lesanovsky, and B. Olmos, Collectively enhanced chiral photon emission from an atomic array near a nanofiber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 093601 (2020)

    2020

  41. [41]

    Liedl, F

    C. Liedl, F. Tebbenjohanns, C. Bach, S. Pucher, A. Rauschenbeutel, and P. Schneeweiss, Observation of superradiant bursts in a cascaded quantum system, Phys. Rev. X14, 011020 (2024)

    2024

  42. [42]

    Rauschenbeutel, Emergence of second-order coher- ence in superfluorescence, Phys

    C.Bach, F.Tebbenjohanns, C.Liedl, P.Schneeweiss,and A. Rauschenbeutel, Emergence of second-order coher- ence in superfluorescence, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 063402 (2026)

    2026

  43. [43]

    Shi and A

    J. Shi and A. N. Poddubny, Chiral dissociation of bound photon pairs for a non-hermitian skin effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 233602 (2025)

    2025

  44. [44]

    Marques, I

    Y. Marques, I. Shelykh, and I. Iorsh, Bound photonic pairs in 2d waveguide quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 273602 (2021)

    2021

  45. [45]

    Tečer, M

    M. Tečer, M. Di Liberto, P. Silvi, S. Montangero, F. Ro- manato, and G. Calajó, Strongly interacting photons in 7 2d waveguide qed, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 163602 (2024)

    2024

  46. [46]

    Zhang and K

    Y.-X. Zhang and K. Mølmer, Subradiant emission from regular atomic arrays: universal scaling of decay rates from the generalized bloch theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 253601 (2020)

    2020

  47. [47]

    [63–68],

    See Supplemental Material for detailed derivations, ad- ditional plots and extended discussions, which includes Refs. [63–68],

  48. [48]

    M. O. Scully, E. S. Fry, C. R. Ooi, and K. Wódkiewicz, Directed spontaneous emission from an extended ensem- ble of n atoms: timing is everything, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 010501 (2006)

    2006

  49. [49]

    D. A. Steck, Rubidium 87 D line data (Version 2.3.4, last revised 8 August 2025), http://steck.us/alkalidata

    2025

  50. [50]

    Tečer, G

    M. Tečer, G. Calajó, and M. Di Liberto, Flat-band- mediated photon-photon interactions in two-dimensional waveguide qed networks, Phys. Rev. A113, 013701 (2026)

    2026

  51. [51]

    Lodahl, S

    P. Lodahl, S. Mahmoodian, S. Stobbe, A. Rauschenbeu- tel, P. Schneeweiss, J. Volz, H. Pichler, and P. Zoller, Chiral quantum optics, Nature541, 473 (2017)

    2017

  52. [52]

    Suárez-Forero, M

    D. Suárez-Forero, M. Jalali Mehrabad, C. Vega, A. González-Tudela, and M. Hafezi, Chiral quantum op- tics: recent developments and future directions, PRX Quantum6, 020101 (2025)

    2025

  53. [53]

    Calajó, M

    G. Calajó, M. Tečer, S. Montangero, P. Silvi, and M. Di Liberto, Many-body quantum dimerization in two- dimensional atomic arrays, Phys. Rev. A112, 013722 (2025)

    2025

  54. [54]

    Bello, G

    M. Bello, G. Platero, J. I. Cirac, and A. González-Tudela, Unconventional quantum optics in topological waveguide qed, Sci. Adv.5, eaaw0297 (2019)

    2019

  55. [55]

    Perczel, J

    J. Perczel, J. Borregaard, D. E. Chang, S. F. Yelin, and M. D. Lukin, Topological quantum optics using atomlike emitter arrays coupled to photonic crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 083603 (2020)

    2020

  56. [56]

    C. Vega, D. Porras, and A. González-Tudela, Topologi- cal multimode waveguide qed, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 023031 (2023)

    2023

  57. [57]

    G. Tian, Y. Wu, and X.-Y. Lü, Power-law-exponential interaction induced quantum spiral phases, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033290 (2024)

    2024

  58. [58]

    C. C. Rusconi, T. Shi, and J. I. Cirac, Exploiting the photonic nonlinearity of free-space subwavelength arrays of atoms, Phys. Rev. A104, 033718 (2021)

    2021

  59. [59]

    Castells-Graells, J

    D. Castells-Graells, J. I. Cirac, and D. S. Wild, Cavity quantum electrodynamics with atom arrays in free space, Phys. Rev. A111, 053712 (2025)

    2025

  60. [60]

    Olmos and I

    B. Olmos and I. Lesanovsky, Hybrid sub-and superradi- ant states in emitter arrays with quantized motion, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 243602 (2025)

    2025

  61. [61]

    Eltohfa and F

    M. Eltohfa and F. Robicheaux, Effects of finite trap- ping on the decay, recoil, and decoherence of dark states of quantum emitter arrays, Phys. Rev. A112, 023112 (2025)

    2025

  62. [62]

    Zhang, C

    Y.-X. Zhang, C. R. i Carceller, M. Kjaergaard, and A. S. Sørensen, Charge-noise insensitive chiral photonic inter- face for waveguide circuit qed, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 233601 (2021)

    2021

  63. [63]

    Wang and H.-R

    X. Wang and H.-R. Li, Chiral quantum network with giant atoms, Quantum Sci. Technol.7, 035007 (2022)

    2022

  64. [64]

    Fedorovich, D

    G. Fedorovich, D. Kornovan, A. Poddubny, and M. Petrov, Chirality-driven delocalization in disordered waveguide-coupled quantum arrays, Phys. Rev. A106, 043723 (2022)

    2022

  65. [65]

    Zhong, N

    J. Zhong, N. A. Olekhno, Y. Ke, A. V. Poshakinskiy, C. Lee, Y. S. Kivshar, and A. N. Poddubny, Photon- mediated localization in two-level qubit arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 093604 (2020)

    2020

  66. [66]

    Le Kien, S

    F. Le Kien, S. D. Gupta, K. Nayak, and K. Hakuta, Nanofiber-mediated radiative transfer between two dis- tant atoms, Phys. Rev. A72, 063815 (2005)

    2005

  67. [67]

    L. Tong, J. Lou, and E. Mazur, Single-mode guiding properties of subwavelength-diameter silica and silicon wire waveguides, Opt. Express12, 1025 (2004)

    2004

  68. [68]

    Solano, J

    P. Solano, J. A. Grover, J. E. Hoffman, S. Ravets, F. K. Fatemi, L. A. Orozco, and S. L. Rolston, Opti- cal nanofibers: a new platform for quantum optics, in Advances In Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, Vol. 66 (Elsevier, 2017) pp. 439–505

    2017

  69. [69]

    Most Subradiant Bound Photon Pairs from Chirality-Mediated Dispersion Softening

    M. B. Svendsen and B. Olmos, Modified dipole-dipole interactions in the presence of a nanophotonic waveguide, Quantum7, 1091 (2023). 1 Supplemental Material for “Most Subradiant Bound Photon Pairs from Chirality-Mediated Dispersion Softening” Kailin Tan, Xuanbing Jiang, Dong Wang, and Saijun Wu Department of Physics, State Key Laboratory of Surface Physic...

    2023

  70. [70]

    To this end, we shall show that|˜µR,m|is bounded

    Boundedness of˜µ R,m Here we prove that˜µR,m is a bounded sequence. To this end, we shall show that|˜µR,m|is bounded. First, if zex 1 =z ex 2 , the proof is trivial since˜µR,m is independent ofm. Thus, we focus on the case wherezex 1 ̸=z ex 2 . We find that |˜µR,m| ≤ 1 d   1 Bex Aex 1−zex 1 ei(k0+Kex /2)d 1−zex 2 ei(k0+Kex /2)d zex 2 zex 1 m −1 ∂Kzex 1 ...

  71. [71]

    ei(k0− Kex 2 )d(∂Kzex 1 −iz ex 1 d/2) 1−z ex 1 ei(k0− Kex 2 )d + ∂KAex Aex # +Bex h 1−z ex 1 ei(k0− Kex 2 )d ih zex 2 ei(k0− Kex 2 )d im

    Boundedness of˜ν R,m Likewise, we demonstrate that|˜νR,m|is bounded. The proof is also trivial forzex 1 =z ex 2 , and we find |˜νR,m| ≤ ςSex 2 + 1 d   1 Bex Aex 1−zex 1 ei(k0+Kex /2)d 1−zex 2 ei(k0+Kex /2)d zex 2 zex 1 m −1 ei(k0+ Kex 2 )d(∂Kzex 1 +iz ex 1 d/2) 1−z ex 1 ei(k0+ Kex 2 )d + ∂KAex Aex + 1 Aex Bex 1−zex 2 ei(k0+Kex /2)d 1−zex 1 ei(k0+Kex /2)...