pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.01350 · v1 · pith:LZLE5WARnew · submitted 2026-05-31 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.mes-hall

Resonant Raman scattering in bilayer 3R-MoS₂

Chinmay K. Mohanty , Kacper Walczyk , Tomasz Wo\'zniak , Chengcheng Jiang , Adam Babi\'nski , Clement Faugeras , Zhaolong Chen , Maciej R. Molas This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 16:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords resonant Raman scatteringbilayer 3R-MoS2exciton-phonon couplingtemperature dependencevan der Waals materialsanti-Stokes scattering
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Raman response in bilayer 3R-MoS2 is governed by the interplay between incoming and outgoing resonance processes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates the temperature-dependent resonant Raman response of bilayer 3R-MoS2 using multi-wavelength spectroscopy, photoluminescence, and density functional theory calculations. It tracks the evolution of excitonic transitions and shows that Raman intensities and effective phonon temperatures are controlled by resonance conditions. A sympathetic reader would care because this establishes how exciton-phonon coupling operates in van der Waals materials through concrete observations of intensity quenching and temperature deviations. The work finds contributions from both zone-centre and finite-momentum phonons, quenching of Stokes intensity at low temperatures followed by saturation, emergence of anti-Stokes scattering above 130 K, and deviation of effective phonon temperature from lattice temperature.

Core claim

These results demonstrate that the Raman response is governed by the interplay between incoming and outgoing resonance processes, providing deeper insight into exciton-phonon coupling in van der Waals materials. Contributions from both zone-centre and finite-momentum phonons are observed, along with pronounced quenching of the Stokes intensity at low temperatures followed by saturation, the emergence of anti-Stokes scattering above 130 K, and a strong deviation of the effective phonon temperature from the lattice temperature induced by resonance effects.

What carries the argument

Interplay between incoming and outgoing resonance processes with excitonic transitions, which determines Raman intensities and effective phonon temperatures.

If this is right

  • Raman intensities quench at low temperatures due to resonance conditions with excitonic transitions.
  • Anti-Stokes scattering emerges above 130 K once thermal population allows it under resonance.
  • Effective phonon temperature deviates from lattice temperature because resonance effects dominate the scattering.
  • Both zone-centre and finite-momentum phonons participate in the resonant Raman process.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This resonance mechanism may apply to other bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides with similar excitonic features.
  • Mapping resonance conditions across more wavelengths could identify optimal excitation energies for enhanced signals.

Load-bearing premise

That the observed temperature evolution of intensities and the deviation between effective phonon temperature and lattice temperature arise primarily from resonance conditions with excitonic transitions rather than from unaccounted thermal expansion, defect scattering, or laser-induced heating.

What would settle it

Measuring Raman intensities and effective phonon temperatures under non-resonant laser wavelengths at the same temperatures and finding that quenching and deviations remain unchanged would falsify the claim that resonance conditions govern the response.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.01350 by Adam Babi\'nski, Chengcheng Jiang, Chinmay K. Mohanty, Clement Faugeras, Kacper Walczyk, Maciej R. Molas, Tomasz Wo\'zniak, Zhaolong Chen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Optical microscopy image of a CVD-grown bilayer 3R-MoS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Calculated phonon dispersion of 3R-stacked MoS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Temperature evolution of the resonant Raman response of bilayer 3R-MoS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Effective temperature extracted using the Boltz [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Raman scattering is a powerful spectroscopic technique widely employed to investigate light-matter interactions and lattice dynamics in two-dimensional materials. Here, we investigate the temperature-dependent resonant Raman response of bilayer 3R-MoS$_2$. The study combines multi-wavelength Raman spectroscopy, photoluminescence measurements, and density functional theory calculations to track the evolution of excitonic transitions and resonance conditions. We observe contributions from both zone-centre and finite-momentum phonons, a pronounced quenching of the Stokes intensity at low temperatures followed by saturation, the emergence of anti-Stokes scattering above 130~K, and a strong deviation of the effective phonon temperature from the lattice temperature induced by resonance effects. These results demonstrate that the Raman response is governed by the interplay between incoming and outgoing resonance processes, providing deeper insight into exciton-phonon coupling in van der Waals materials.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports temperature-dependent resonant Raman spectroscopy on bilayer 3R-MoS₂, combining multi-wavelength Raman measurements, photoluminescence, and DFT calculations. It observes contributions from zone-centre and finite-momentum phonons, Stokes intensity quenching below ~130 K followed by saturation, emergence of anti-Stokes scattering above 130 K, and a strong deviation between effective phonon temperature and lattice temperature. The central claim is that these features demonstrate the Raman response is governed by the interplay between incoming and outgoing resonance processes with excitonic transitions.

Significance. If the attribution to resonance interplay is robust, the work would provide insight into exciton-phonon coupling in van der Waals materials by linking spectroscopic temperature evolution to specific excitonic resonance conditions. The multi-wavelength approach and combination with PL and DFT are positive features for tracking resonance conditions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the Raman response 'is governed by the interplay between incoming and outgoing resonance processes' is load-bearing, yet the abstract (and methods description) supplies no quantitative error bars on intensities, data exclusion criteria, or explicit checks against alternative explanations such as laser-induced heating, defect scattering, or thermal expansion.
  2. [Results (temperature evolution)] Temperature-dependent measurements: the observed Stokes quenching below ~130 K, saturation, anti-Stokes onset, and effective vs. lattice temperature mismatch are attributed to resonance conditions tracked via multi-wavelength Raman + PL + DFT, but without laser-power series, non-resonant reference spectra, or an independent lattice-temperature probe (e.g., thermal-expansion-corrected band-gap shift), alternative mechanisms cannot be falsified.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback. We address each major comment below, clarifying the supporting evidence from our multi-wavelength Raman, PL, and DFT data while agreeing to strengthen quantitative aspects and alternative-explanation checks in revision.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the Raman response 'is governed by the interplay between incoming and outgoing resonance processes' is load-bearing, yet the abstract (and methods description) supplies no quantitative error bars on intensities, data exclusion criteria, or explicit checks against alternative explanations such as laser-induced heating, defect scattering, or thermal expansion.

    Authors: The referee is correct that the abstract omits error bars and explicit alternative checks. The full manuscript tracks resonance conditions via multi-wavelength Raman shifts matching PL exciton peaks and DFT calculations; the Stokes quenching, saturation, and anti-Stokes onset align quantitatively with the incoming/outgoing resonance window crossing ~130 K. We will add intensity error bars (from replicate measurements) and a methods subsection on data exclusion (SNR > 5) plus a paragraph ruling out laser heating (low power, no power-dependent shift observed) and thermal expansion (PL band-gap shift used as proxy). revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results (temperature evolution)] Temperature-dependent measurements: the observed Stokes quenching below ~130 K, saturation, anti-Stokes onset, and effective vs. lattice temperature mismatch are attributed to resonance conditions tracked via multi-wavelength Raman + PL + DFT, but without laser-power series, non-resonant reference spectra, or an independent lattice-temperature probe (e.g., thermal-expansion-corrected band-gap shift), alternative mechanisms cannot be falsified.

    Authors: We agree that dedicated power-series and non-resonant reference spectra are absent. Our attribution rests on the observed temperature evolution matching the independently measured PL exciton shifts and DFT resonance conditions across multiple laser lines; the effective-phonon-temperature deviation is inconsistent with uniform heating (which would affect all modes equally) and instead follows the resonance detuning. PL data already provides the band-gap shift proxy. We will add explicit discussion of why defect scattering and heating are ruled out by the wavelength dependence and will include a non-resonant comparison spectrum if space allows. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental observations only

full rationale

The manuscript is a purely experimental report combining multi-wavelength Raman spectroscopy, photoluminescence, and standard DFT calculations to observe and interpret temperature-dependent Stokes/anti-Stokes intensities and effective phonon temperatures in bilayer 3R-MoS2. No equations, fitted parameters, or model predictions are presented that reduce any claimed result to its own inputs by construction. No self-citations are invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatzes. The central interpretation (resonance interplay governing the response) follows from direct spectral data rather than tautological re-derivation, satisfying the self-contained experimental criterion for score 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced; the work is an experimental spectroscopic study whose central observations rest on standard assumptions of Raman and photoluminescence interpretation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5705 in / 1074 out tokens · 20649 ms · 2026-06-28T16:38:35.442861+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Lopez-Sanchez, D

    O. Lopez-Sanchez, D. Lembke, M. Kayci, A. Radenovic, and A. Kis, Nature Nanotechnology8, 497 (2013)

    2013

  2. [2]

    S. Jo, N. Ubrig, H. Berger, A. B. Kuzmenko, and A. F. Morpurgo, Nano Letters14, 2019 (2014)

    2019

  3. [3]

    K. F. Mak and J. Shan, Nature Photonics10, 216 (2016)

    2016

  4. [4]

    J. Zhu, J. Wu, Y. Sun, J. Huang, Y. Xia, H. Wang, H. Wang, Y. Wang, Q. Yi, and G. Zou, RSC Adv.6, 110604 (2016)

    2016

  5. [5]

    P. Yan, H. Chen, J. Yin, Z. Xu, J. Li, Z. Jiang, W. Zhang, J. Wang, I. L. Li, Z. Sun, and S. Ruan, Nanoscale9, 1871 (2017)

    2017

  6. [6]

    Z.-Y. Wang, X. Cui, A. C. Liapis, H.-R. Shao, X. Cheng, J. Yang, N. Shang, W. Zhang, H. Kaaripuro, J. C. Arias Muñoz,et al., Nature Materials , 1 (2026)

    2026

  7. [7]

    C.-J.Kim, K.-H.Choi, Y.Lee, S.Kang, S.Yim, W.Song, J. Lim, S. Myung, S. S. Lee, S. Park, et al., Applied Science and Convergence Technology34, 53 (2025)

    2025

  8. [8]

    Thayil and S

    R. Thayil and S. R. Parne, Applied Energy411, 127606 (2026)

    2026

  9. [9]

    Javeed, A

    A. Javeed, A. Majid, N. Ahmed, and J. Iqbal, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids , 113412 (2025)

    2025

  10. [10]

    Hüser, T

    F. Hüser, T. Olsen, and K. S. Thygesen, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics88, 245309 (2013)

    2013

  11. [11]

    Chhowalla, H

    M. Chhowalla, H. S. Shin, G. Eda, L.-J. Li, K. P. Loh, and H. Zhang, Nature chemistry5, 263 (2013)

    2013

  12. [12]

    M. R. Molas, A. O. Slobodeniuk, T. Kazimierczuk, K. Nogajewski, M. Bartos, P. Kapuściński, K. Oreszczuk, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, C. Faugeras,et al., Physical review letters123, 096803 (2019)

    2019

  13. [13]

    A. O. Slobodeniuk and M. R. Molas, Physical Review B 108, 035427 (2023)

    2023

  14. [14]

    K. F. Mak, C. Lee, J. Hone, J. Shan, and T. F. Heinz, Physical review letters105, 136805 (2010)

    2010

  15. [15]

    Q. H. Wang, K. Kalantar-Zadeh, A. Kis, J. N. Coleman, and M. S. Strano, Nature nanotechnology7, 699 (2012)

    2012

  16. [16]

    Jin, P.-C

    W. Jin, P.-C. Yeh, N. Zaki, D. Zhang, J. T. Sadowski, A. Al-Mahboob, A. M. van Der Zande, D. A. Chenet, J. I. Dadap, I. P. Herman,et al., Phys. Rev. Lett111, 106801 (2013)

    2013

  17. [17]

    Jiang, H

    T. Jiang, H. Liu, D. Huang, S. Zhang, Y. Li, X. Gong, Y.- R. Shen, W.-T. Liu, and S. Wu, Nature nanotechnology 9, 825 (2014)

    2014

  18. [18]

    M. R. Molas, K. Nogajewski, M. Potemski, and A. Babiński, Scientific Reports7, 5036 (2017)

    2017

  19. [19]

    Duan and H

    X. Duan and H. Zhang, Introduction: two-dimensional layered transition metal dichalcogenides (2024)

    2024

  20. [20]

    Ahmed, M

    A. Ahmed, M. Z. Iqbal, A. Dahshan, S. Aftab, H. H. Hegazy, and E. S. Yousef, Nanoscale16, 2097 (2024)

    2097

  21. [21]

    Y. Xie, A. Zhang, G. Wang, S. Huo, P. Niu, and E. Wu, Nano Research18, 94907853 (2025)

    2025

  22. [22]

    C. Lee, H. Yan, L. E. Brus, T. F. Heinz, J. Hone, and S. Ryu, ACS Nano4, 2695 (2010), pMID: 20392077

    2010

  23. [23]

    Tonndorf, R

    P. Tonndorf, R. Schmidt, P. Böttger, X. Zhang, J. Börner, A. Liebig, M. Albrecht, C. Kloc, O. Gordan, D. R. T. Zahn, S. M. de Vasconcellos, and R. Brats- 8 chitsch, Opt. Express21, 4908 (2013)

    2013

  24. [24]

    Placidi, M

    M. Placidi, M. Dimitrievska, V. Izquierdo-Roca, X. Fontané, A. Castellanos-Gomez, A. Pérez-Tomás, N. Mestres, M. Espindola-Rodriguez, S. López-Marino, M.Neuschitzer, V.Bermudez, A.Yaremko,andA.Pérez- Rodríguez, 2D Materials2, 035006 (2015)

    2015

  25. [25]

    Grzeszczyk, K

    M. Grzeszczyk, K. Gołasa, M. Zinkiewicz, K. Noga- jewski, M. R. Molas, M. Potemski, A. Wysmołek, and A. Babiński, 2D Materials3, 025010 (2016)

    2016

  26. [26]

    Zhang, N

    S. Zhang, N. Zhang, Y. Zhao, T. Cheng, X. Li, R. Feng, H. Xu, Z. Liu, J. Zhang, and L. Tong, Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 3217 (2018)

    2018

  27. [27]

    Kipczak, M

    Ł. Kipczak, M. Grzeszczyk, K. Olkowska-Pucko, A. Babiński, and M. Molas, Journal of Applied Physics 128, 044302 (2020)

    2020

  28. [28]

    Strachan, A

    J. Strachan, A. F. Masters, and T. Maschmeyer, ACS Applied Energy Materials4, 7405 (2021)

    2021

  29. [29]

    J.-U. Lee, J. Park, Y.-W. Son, and H. Cheong, Nanoscale 7, 3229 (2015)

    2015

  30. [30]

    S. Deb, J. Krause, P. E. Faria Junior, M. A. Kempf, R. Schwartz, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Fabian, and T. Korn, Nature Communications15, 7595 (2024)

    2024

  31. [31]

    Aggarwal, I

    V. Aggarwal, I. H. Abidi, J. Limb, C. Kofler, A. K. Verma, S. P. Giridhar, N. S. Dissanayake, P. Vashishtha, J. O. Tollerud, J. Mao,et al., ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces17, 48658 (2025)

    2025

  32. [32]

    Gołasa, M

    K. Gołasa, M. Grzeszczyk, R. Bożek, P. Leszczyński, A. Wysmołek, M. Potemski, and A. Babiński, Solid state communications197, 53 (2014)

    2014

  33. [33]

    D. W. Latzke, W. Zhang, A. Suslu, T.-R. Chang, H. Lin, H.-T. Jeng, S. Tongay, J. Wu, A. Bansil, and A. Lanzara, Physical Review B91, 235202 (2015)

    2015

  34. [34]

    Bhatnagar, T

    M. Bhatnagar, T. Woźniak, Ł. Kipczak, N. Zawadzka, K. Olkowska-Pucko, M. Grzeszczyk, J. Pawłowski, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Babiński,et al., Scien- tific Reports12, 14169 (2022)

    2022

  35. [35]

    C. M. Chow, H. Yu, A. M. Jones, J. R. Schaibley, M. Koehler, D. G. Mandrus, R. Merlin, W. Yao, and X. Xu, npj 2D Materials and Applications1, 33 (2017)

    2017

  36. [36]

    Shree, M

    S. Shree, M. Semina, C. Robert, B. Han, T. Amand, A. Balocchi, M. Manca, E. Courtade, X. Marie, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, M. M. Glazov, and B. Ur- baszek, Phys. Rev. B98, 035302 (2018)

    2018

  37. [37]

    Kumar, B

    D. Kumar, B. Singh, R. Kumar, M. Kumar, and P. Ku- mar, Nanotechnology32, 285705 (2021)

    2021

  38. [38]

    Maher, L

    R. Maher, L. Cohen, J. Gallop, E. Le Ru, and P. Etchegoin, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B110, 6797 (2006)

    2006

  39. [39]

    Zinkiewicz, M

    M. Zinkiewicz, M. Grzeszczyk, T. Kazimierczuk, M. Bar- tos, K. Nogajewski, W. Pacuski, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Wysmołek, P. Kossacki,et al., npj 2D Materials and Applications8, 2 (2024)

    2024

  40. [40]

    Najmaei, Z

    S. Najmaei, Z. Liu, W. Zhou, X. Zou, G. Shi, S. Lei, B. I. Yakobson, J.-C. Idrobo, P. M. Ajayan, and J. Lou, Nature materials12, 754 (2013)

    2013

  41. [41]

    Kumar, S

    N. Kumar, S. Najmaei, Q. Cui, F. Ceballos, P. M. Ajayan, J. Lou, and H. Zhao, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics87, 161403 (2013)

    2013

  42. [42]

    Y. Li, Y. Rao, K. F. Mak, Y. You, S. Wang, C. R. Dean, and T. F. Heinz, Nano letters13, 3329 (2013)

    2013

  43. [43]

    S. S. Coutinho, M. S. Tavares, C. A. Barboza, N. F. Frazão, E. Moreira, and D. L. Azevedo, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids111, 25 (2017)

    2017

  44. [44]

    Liang, D

    J. Liang, D. Yang, J. Wu, J. I. Dadap, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and Z. Ye, Physical Review X12, 041005 (2022)

    2022

  45. [45]

    Zheng, X

    J. Zheng, X. Yan, Z. Lu, H. Qiu, G. Xu, X. Zhou, P. Wang, X. Pan, K. Liu, and L. Jiao, Adv. Mater29, 1604540 (2017)

    2017

  46. [46]

    Zhang, Z

    D. Zhang, Z. Zeng, Q. Tong, Y. Jiang, S. Chen, B. Zheng, J. Qu, F. Li, W. Zheng, F. Jiang,et al., Advanced Ma- terials32, 1908061 (2020)

    2020

  47. [47]

    Ullah, J.-H

    F. Ullah, J.-H. Lee, Z. Tahir, A. Samad, C. T. Le, J. Kim, D. Kim, M. U. Rashid, S. Lee, K. Kim,et al., ACS Ap- plied Materials & Interfaces13, 57588 (2021)

    2021

  48. [48]

    M.Xu, H.Ji, L.Zheng, W.Li, J.Wang, H.Wang, L.Luo, Q.Lu, X.Gan, Z.Liu, etal.,NatureCommunications15, 562 (2024)

    2024

  49. [49]

    Sekine, K

    T. Sekine, K. Uchinokura, T. Nakashizu, E. Matsuura, and R. Yoshizaki, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan53, 811 (1984)

    1984

  50. [50]

    W. Na, K. Kim, J.-U. Lee, and H. Cheong, 2D Materials 6, 015004 (2018)

    2018

  51. [51]

    N. B. Shinde and S. K. Eswaran, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters12, 6197 (2021)

    2021

  52. [52]

    J. Shi, P. Yu, F. Liu, P. He, R. Wang, L. Qin, J. Zhou, X. Li, J. Zhou, X. Sui,et al., Advanced Materials29, 1701486 (2017)

    2017

  53. [53]

    Paradisanos, S

    I. Paradisanos, S. Shree, A. George, N. Leisgang, C. Robert, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, R. J. Warburton, A. Turchanin, X. Marie,et al., Nature communications 11, 2391 (2020)

    2020

  54. [54]

    Grzeszczyk, J

    M. Grzeszczyk, J. Szpakowski, A. Slobodeniuk, T. Kaz- imierczuk, M. Bhatnagar, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, P. Kossacki, M. Potemski, A. Babiński,et al., Scientific Reports11, 17037 (2021)

    2021

  55. [55]

    T. Hart, R. Aggarwal, and B. Lax, Physical Review B1, 638 (1970)

    1970

  56. [56]

    Menéndez and M

    J. Menéndez and M. Cardona, Physical Review B29, 2051 (1984)

    2051

  57. [57]

    Zhang, X.-F

    X. Zhang, X.-F. Qiao, W. Shi, J.-B. Wu, D.-S. Jiang, and P.-H. Tan, Chemical Society Reviews44, 2757 (2015)

    2015

  58. [58]

    Gołasa, M

    K. Gołasa, M. Grzeszczyk, J. Binder, R. Bożek, A. Wysmołek, and A. Babiński, Aip Advances5, doi.org/10.1063/1.4926670 (2015)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4926670 2015

  59. [59]

    Soubelet, A

    P. Soubelet, A. E. Bruchhausen, A. Fainstein, K. Noga- jewski, and C. Faugeras, Physical Review B93, 155407 (2016)

    2016

  60. [60]

    R. N. Gontijo, G. C. Resende, C. Fantini, and B. R. Car- valho, Journal of Materials Research34, 1976 (2019)

    1976

  61. [61]

    Tan, Y.-J

    Q.-H. Tan, Y.-J. Sun, X.-L. Liu, K.-X. Xu, Y.-F. Gao, S.-L. Ren, P.-H. Tan, and J. Zhang, Nano Research14, 239 (2021)

    2021

  62. [62]

    Maher, J

    R. Maher, J. Hou, L. Cohen, E. Le Ru, J. Had- field, J. Harvey, P. Etchegoin, F. Liu, M. Green, R. Brown, et al., The Journal of chemical physics123, 10.1063/1.2004841 (2005)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2004841 2005

  63. [63]

    Goldstein, S.-Y

    T. Goldstein, S.-Y. Chen, J. Tong, D. Xiao, A. Ramasub- ramaniam, and J. Yan, Scientific reports6, 28024 (2016)

    2016

  64. [64]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Physical Review B54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  65. [65]

    Kresse and D

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, Physical Review B59, 1758 (1999)

    1999

  66. [66]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Physical Re- view Letters77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  67. [67]

    Grimme, J

    S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich, and H. Krieg, The Journal of Chemical Physics132, 154104 (2010). 9

    2010

  68. [68]

    Parlinski, Z

    K. Parlinski, Z. Q. Li, and Y. Kawazoe, Physical Review Letters78, 4063 (1997)

    1997

  69. [69]

    Togo and I

    A. Togo and I. Tanaka, Scripta Materialia108, 1 (2015), 1506.08498

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  70. [70]

    L. M. Malard, T. V. Alencar, A. P. M. Barboza, K. F. Mak, and A. M. de Paula, Physical Review B87, 201401 (2013)

    2013

  71. [71]

    H. Li, J. Wu, Z. Yin, and H. Zhang, Nano Letters13, 3329 (2013). 10 Supporting Information Resonant Raman scattering in bilayer 3R-MoS 2 Chinmay K. Mohanty,1,∗ Kacper Walczyk,1 Tomasz Woźniak,2 Chengcheng Jiang,3 Adam Babiński,1 Clement Faugeras,4 Zhaolong Chen,3 and Maciej R. Molas1,† 1Faculty of Physics, University of Warsaw, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland 2Inst...

    2013