pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.01743 · v1 · pith:7Z7KX24Dnew · submitted 2026-06-01 · ⚛️ physics.atom-ph · nucl-ex· quant-ph

Non-destructive cavity readout of molecules for precision measurements

Alejandro Salas-Estrada , Silviu-Marian Udrescu , Geoffrey Zheng , Qian Wang , Arian Jadbabaie , Vladan Vuleti\'c , David DeMille , Ronald F. Garcia Ruiz
show 1 more author
Edwin Pedrozo-Pe\~nafiel
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 12:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.atom-ph nucl-exquant-ph
keywords non-destructive readoutoptical cavitymolecular rotational statesprecision measurementsradioactive moleculessub-SQL readout
0
0 comments X

The pith

Coupling molecules to a high-finesse optical cavity allows non-destructive readout of rotational-hyperfine state populations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a method that measures the population of molecules in a chosen rotational-hyperfine state by coupling them to a high-finesse optical cavity. This approach produces results in less than one millisecond and supports repeated measurements while cutting heating and losses relative to existing techniques. It reaches precision below the standard quantum limit and is framed as especially useful for radioactive molecules, where sample sizes are small and multiple interrogations are required to reach useful sensitivity. A reader would see the value in any technique that extracts more information from scarce samples without destroying them.

Core claim

Coupling the molecules to a high-finesse optical cavity measures the population in a selected rotational-hyperfine state non-destructively, enabling fast repeated measurements with reduced heating and losses and with precision below the standard quantum limit, an advantage for radioactive molecules where production and sample size are limited.

What carries the argument

High-finesse optical cavity that couples to the molecules to extract state population information without destroying the sample.

Load-bearing premise

The cavity coupling can be arranged so that it does not itself introduce heating, losses, or noise sources that cancel the claimed advantages over traditional methods.

What would settle it

An experiment that measures the same molecular sample before and after cavity coupling and finds heating, loss rates, or readout noise at least as large as those in standard destructive techniques.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.01743 by Alejandro Salas-Estrada, Arian Jadbabaie, David DeMille, Edwin Pedrozo-Pe\~nafiel, Geoffrey Zheng, Qian Wang, Ronald F. Garcia Ruiz, Silviu-Marian Udrescu, Vladan Vuleti\'c.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Molecules interacting strongly with the light inside [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose a non-destructive method to measure the population of molecules in a selected rotational-hyperfine state by coupling them to a high-finesse optical cavity. In contrast to traditional techniques, our approach enables fast (less than 1 ms) repeated measurements with reduced heating and losses, and with precision below the standard quantum limit. The method is particularly advantageous for radioactive molecules, systems of high interest for symmetry violation searches, for which production and sample size are limited, and repeated interrogation is essential for improved sensitivity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a non-destructive readout technique in which molecules in a selected rotational-hyperfine state are coupled to a high-finesse optical cavity. The central claims are that the method permits repeated measurements in less than 1 ms, reduces heating and losses relative to traditional techniques, achieves precision below the standard quantum limit, and is especially beneficial for radioactive molecules whose limited production makes non-destructive, repeated interrogation essential for symmetry-violation searches.

Significance. If the proposed cavity coupling can be implemented without introducing new dominant loss or noise channels, the technique would constitute a meaningful advance for precision measurements on radioactive species, where sample size is the primary sensitivity bottleneck.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claims of sub-SQL precision and reduced heating/losses are stated without any derivation, noise budget, or quantitative estimate of cavity parameters, coupling strength, or decoherence rates that would allow the reader to assess whether the performance targets are reachable.
  2. The manuscript provides no analysis of the cavity-molecule interaction Hamiltonian, the resulting measurement back-action, or the conditions under which the readout remains non-destructive; without these elements the central performance assertions cannot be evaluated.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript. The comments highlight the need for more quantitative support of the central claims, which we address below by outlining additions to the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claims of sub-SQL precision and reduced heating/losses are stated without any derivation, noise budget, or quantitative estimate of cavity parameters, coupling strength, or decoherence rates that would allow the reader to assess whether the performance targets are reachable.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract and main text would benefit from explicit estimates. In the revision we add a new section with order-of-magnitude calculations using realistic cavity parameters (finesse ~10^5, mode volume ~10^{-12} m^3), typical molecular transition strengths, and decoherence rates from spontaneous emission and cavity loss. A basic noise budget is included showing how the dispersive readout can reach sub-SQL sensitivity while keeping heating below levels of traditional fluorescence methods. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The manuscript provides no analysis of the cavity-molecule interaction Hamiltonian, the resulting measurement back-action, or the conditions under which the readout remains non-destructive; without these elements the central performance assertions cannot be evaluated.

    Authors: We accept that a derivation of the interaction is required. The revised manuscript adds a subsection deriving the dispersive Hamiltonian for the molecule-cavity system, estimating the AC Stark shift and photon scattering rate, and identifying the regime (large single-photon detuning, weak driving) in which back-action remains negligible over the <1 ms readout window, preserving the non-destructive character. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper is a forward proposal for an experimental method rather than a derivation chain. No equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or self-citations that reduce to inputs are described in the abstract or reader's assessment. The work focuses on advantages of cavity coupling for radioactive molecules without load-bearing mathematical steps that could exhibit circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proposal rests on standard cavity QED assumptions but introduces no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities in the abstract; the central claim is a method suggestion rather than a derived result.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5649 in / 954 out tokens · 21320 ms · 2026-06-28T12:02:37.769507+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    The molecular cloud will then be super- posed with the optical lattice created by a standing wave inside the optical cavity

    for details). The molecular cloud will then be super- posed with the optical lattice created by a standing wave inside the optical cavity. This lattice will be used as a conservative trap for the molecules while ensuring that they are located close to the cavity waist. We expect a transfer efficiency from the MOT to the cavity lattice of about 1−10%. Then...

  2. [2]

    Navas, C

    S. Navas, C. Amsler, T. Gutsche, C. Hanhart, J. Hern´ andez-Rey, C. Louren¸ co, A. Masoni, M. Mikhasenko, R. Mitchell, C. Patrignani,et al., Physical Review D110, 030001 (2024)

    2024

  3. [3]

    Safronova, D

    M. Safronova, D. Budker, D. DeMille, D. Kimball, A. Derevianko, and C. Clark, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 025008 (2018)

    2018

  4. [4]

    T. S. Roussy, L. Caldwell, T. Wright, W. B. Cairncross, Y. Shagam, K. B. Ng, N. Schlossberger, S. Y. Park, A. Wang, J. Ye,et al., Science381, 46 (2023)

    2023

  5. [5]

    Andreev, D

    V. Andreev, D. Ang, D. DeMille, J. Doyle, G. Gabrielse, J. Haefner, Z. Hutzler, N.R. and. Lasner, C. Meisen- helder, B. O’Leary,et al., Nature562, 355 (2018)

    2018

  6. [6]

    N. R. Hutzler, Quantum Science and Technology5, 044011 (2020)

    2020

  7. [7]

    Grasdijk, O

    O. Grasdijk, O. Timgren, J. Kastelic, T. Wright, S. Lam- oreaux, D. DeMille, K. Wenz, M. Aitken, T. Zelevinsky, T. Winick,et al., Quantum Science and Technology6, 044007 (2021)

    2021

  8. [8]

    Arrowsmith-Kron, M

    G. Arrowsmith-Kron, M. Athanasakis-Kaklamanakis, M. Au, J. Ballof, R. Berger, A. Borschevsky, A. Breier, 6 F. Buchinger, D. Budker, and L. Caldwell, Rep. Prog. Phys.87, 084301 (2024)

    2024

  9. [9]

    Altunta¸ s, J

    E. Altunta¸ s, J. Ammon, S. B. Cahn, and D. DeMille, Physical Review Letters120, 142501 (2018)

    2018

  10. [10]

    J. W. Blanchard, D. Budker, D. DeMille, M. G. Ko- zlov, and L. V. Skripnikov, Physical Review Research5, 013191 (2023)

    2023

  11. [11]

    Karthein, S.-M

    J. Karthein, S.-M. Udrescu, S. B. Moroch, I. Belosevic, K. Blaum, A. Borschevsky, Y. Chamorro, D. DeMille, J. Dilling, R. F. Garcia Ruiz,et al., Physical Review Letters133, 033003 (2024)

    2024

  12. [12]

    X. Yang, S. Wang, S. Wilkins, and R. Garcia Ruiz, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.129, 104005 (2023)

    2023

  13. [13]

    Engel, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 75

    J. Engel, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 75

  14. [14]

    R. F. Garcia Ruiz, R. Berger, J. Billowes, C. Binnersley, M. Bissell, A. Breier, A. Brinson, K. Chrysalidis, T. Co- colios, B. Cooper,et al., Nature581, 396 (2020)

    2020

  15. [15]

    Udrescu, A

    S. Udrescu, A. Brinson, R. G. Ruiz, K. Gaul, R. Berger, J. Billowes, C. Binnersley, M. Bissell, A. Breier, K. Chrysalidis,et al., Physical Review Letters127, 033001 (2021)

    2021

  16. [16]

    Udrescu, S

    S.-M. Udrescu, S. G. Wilkins, A. Breier, M. Athanasakis- Kaklamanakis, R. F. Garcia Ruiz, M. Au, I. Beloˇ sevi´ c, R. Berger, M. Bissell, C. Binnersley,et al., Nature Physics20, 202 (2024)

    2024

  17. [17]

    Wilkins, S

    S. Wilkins, S. Udrescu, M. Athanasakis-Kaklamanakis, R. Garcia Ruiz, M. Au, I. Beloˇ sevi´ c, R. Berger, M. Bis- sell, A. Breier, A. Brinson,et al., Science390, 386 (2025)

    2025

  18. [18]

    Wilkins, H

    S. Wilkins, H. Perrett, S. Udrescu, A. Kyuberis, L. Paˇ steka, M. Au, I. Beloˇ sevi´ c, R. Berger, C. Binnersley, M. Bissell,et al., Phys. Rev. Res.8, L012012 (2026)

    2026

  19. [19]

    C. J. Conn, P. Yu, M. I. Howard, Y. Yang, C. Zhang, A. Jadbabaie, A. Gorou, A. N. Gaiser, T. C. Steimle, L. Cheng,et al., arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.08368 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Udrescu, D

    S.-M. Udrescu, D. A. Torres, and R. F. Garcia Ruiz, Physical Review Research6, 013128 (2024)

    2024

  21. [21]

    DeMille, N

    D. DeMille, N. R. Hutzler, A. M. Rey, and T. Zelevinsky, Nature Physics20, 741 (2024)

    2024

  22. [22]

    Langen, G

    T. Langen, G. Valtolina, D. Wang, and J. Ye, Nature Physics20, 702 (2024)

    2024

  23. [23]

    Barry, D

    J. Barry, D. McCarron, E. Norrgard, M. Steinecker, and D. DeMille, Nature512, 286 (2014)

    2014

  24. [24]

    J. J. Burau, P. Aggarwal, K. Mehling, and J. Ye, Physical Review Letters130, 193401 (2023)

    2023

  25. [25]

    Truppe, H

    S. Truppe, H. Williams, M. Hambach, L. Caldwell, N. Fitch, E. Hinds, B. Sauer, and M. Tarbutt, Nature Physics13, 1173 (2017)

    2017

  26. [26]

    J. E. Padilla-Castillo, J. Cai, P. Agarwal, P. Kukreja, R. Thomas, B. G. Sartakov, S. Truppe, G. Meijer, and S. C. Wright, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 243401 (2025)

    2025

  27. [27]

    J. J. Park, Y.-K. Lu, A. O. Jamison, and W. Ketterle, Nature Physics19, 1567 (2023)

    2023

  28. [28]

    Miller, A

    C. Miller, A. N. Carroll, J. Lin, H. Hirzler, H. Gao, H. Zhou, M. D. Lukin, and J. Ye, Nature633, 332 (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    Bigagli, W

    N. Bigagli, W. Yuan, S. Zhang, B. Bulatovic, T. Karman, I. Stevenson, and S. Will, Nature631, 289 (2024)

    2024

  30. [30]

    L. R. Picard, A. J. Park, G. E. Patenotte, S. Gebretsad- kan, D. Wellnitz, A. M. Rey, and K.-K. Ni, Nature637, 821 (2025)

    2025

  31. [31]

    Christakis, J

    L. Christakis, J. S. Rosenberg, R. Raj, S. Chi, A. Morn- ingstar, D. A. Huse, Z. Z. Yan, and W. S. Bakr, Nature 614, 64 (2023)

    2023

  32. [32]

    C. M. Holland, Y. Lu, and L. W. Cheuk, Science382, 1143 (2023)

    2023

  33. [33]

    N. B. Vilas, P. Robichaud, C. Hallas, G. K. Li, L. An- deregg, and J. M. Doyle, Nature628, 282 (2024)

    2024

  34. [34]

    D. K. Ruttley, T. R. Hepworth, A. Guttridge, and S. L. Cornish, Nature637, 827 (2025)

    2025

  35. [35]

    Kondov, C.-H

    S. Kondov, C.-H. Lee, K. Leung, C. Liedl, I. Majew- ska, R. Moszynski, and T. Zelevinsky, Nature Physics 15, 1118 (2019)

    2019

  36. [36]

    J. C. Shaw, J. C. Schnaubelt, and D. J. McCarron, Phys. Rev. Res.3, L042041 (2021)

    2021

  37. [37]

    H. J. Kimble, Physica Scripta1998, 127 (1998)

    1998

  38. [38]

    Haroche, Reviews of Modern Physics85, 1083 (2013)

    S. Haroche, Reviews of Modern Physics85, 1083 (2013)

    2013

  39. [39]

    Yano and T

    Y. Yano and T. Motobayashi, Nuclear Physics News17, 5 (2007)

    2007

  40. [40]

    Glasmacher, B

    T. Glasmacher, B. Sherrill, W. Nazarewicz, A. Gade, P. Mantica, J. Wei, G. Bollen, and B. Bull, Nuclear Physics News27, 28 (2017)

    2017

  41. [41]

    M. J. Borge and B. Jonson, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics44, 044011 (2017)

    2017

  42. [42]

    R. J. Thompson, G. Rempe, and H. J. Kimble, Phys. Rev. Lett.68, 1132 (1992)

    1992

  43. [43]

    Pinkse, T

    P. Pinkse, T. Fischer, P. Maunz, and G. Rempe, Nature 404, 365 (2000)

    2000

  44. [44]

    K. M. Fortier, S. Y. Kim, M. J. Gibbons, P. Ahmadi, and M. S. Chapman, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 233601 (2007)

    2007

  45. [45]

    Terraciano, R

    M. Terraciano, R. Olson Knell, D. Norris, J. Jing, A. Fern´ andez, and L. Orozco, Nature Physics5, 480 (2009)

    2009

  46. [46]

    I. D. Leroux, M. H. Schleier-Smith, and V. Vuleti´ c, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 073602 (2010)

    2010

  47. [47]

    K. C. Cox, G. P. Greve, J. M. Weiner, and J. K. Thomp- son, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 093602 (2016)

    2016

  48. [48]

    Hosten, N

    O. Hosten, N. J. Engelsen, R. Krishnakumar, and M. A. Kasevich, Nature529, 505 (2016)

    2016

  49. [49]

    Pedrozo-Pe˜ nafiel, S

    E. Pedrozo-Pe˜ nafiel, S. Colombo, C. Shu, A. F. Adiy- atullin, Z. Li, E. Mendez, B. Braverman, A. Kawasaki, D. Akamatsu, Y. Xiao,et al., Nature588, 414 (2020)

    2020

  50. [50]

    Periwal, E

    A. Periwal, E. S. Cooper, P. Kunkel, J. F. Wienand, E. J. Davis, and M. Schleier-Smith, Nature600, 630 (2021)

    2021

  51. [51]

    J. M. Robinson, M. Miklos, Y. M. Tso, C. J. Kennedy, T. Bothwell, D. Kedar, J. K. Thompson, and J. Ye, Na- ture Physics20, 208 (2024)

    2024

  52. [52]

    Shadmany, A

    D. Shadmany, A. Kumar, A. Soper, L. Palm, C. Yin, H. Ando, B. Li, L. Taneja, M. Jaffe, S. David, and J. Si- mon, Science Advances11, eads8171 (2025)

    2025

  53. [53]

    Brennecke, T

    F. Brennecke, T. Donner, S. Ritter, T. Bourdel, M. K¨ ohl, and T. Esslinger, Nature450, 268 (2007)

    2007

  54. [54]

    R. M. Kroeze, Y. Guo, V. D. Vaidya, J. Keeling, and B. L. Lev, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 163601 (2018)

    2018

  55. [55]

    K. Roux, H. Konishi, V. Helson, and J.-P. Brantut, Na- ture Communications11, 2974 (2020)

    2020

  56. [56]

    B. L. Lev, A. Vukics, E. R. Hudson, B. C. Sawyer, P. Domokos, H. Ritsch, and J. Ye, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics77, 023402 (2008)

    2008

  57. [57]

    Y. Lu, S. J. Li, C. M. Holland, and L. W. Cheuk, Nature Physics20, 389 (2024)

    2024

  58. [58]

    Jorapur, T

    V. Jorapur, T. K. Langin, Q. Wang, G. Zheng, and D. De- Mille, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 163403 (2024)

    2024

  59. [59]

    [59– 70]

    See Supplemental Material below for details about the theoretical model, numerical estimations, conveyor belt MOT, and microwave transfers, which includes Refs. [59– 70]

  60. [60]

    G. K. Li, C. Hallas, and J. M. Doyle, New J. Phys.27, 7 043002 (2025)

    2025

  61. [61]

    Hallas, G

    C. Hallas, G. K. Li, N. B. Vilas, P. Robichaud, L. An- deregg, and J. M. Doyle, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 133402 (2026)

    2026

  62. [62]

    S. S. Yu, J. You, Y. Bao, L. Anderegg, C. Hallas, G. K. Li, D. Lim, E. Chae, W. Ketterle, K.-K. Ni,et al., Nature Communications (2026)

    2026

  63. [63]

    Z. Zeng, S. Yang, S. Deng, and B. Yan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 073402 (2026)

    2026

  64. [64]

    Sawaoka, A

    H. Sawaoka, A. Nasir, A. Lunstad, M. Li, J. Mango, Z. D. Lasner, and J. M. Doyle, Phys. Rev. Res.8, 013100 (2026)

    2026

  65. [65]

    Wang,Laser Cooling, Trapping, and Coherent Con- trol of Strontium Monofluoride Molecules, Ph.D

    Q. Wang,Laser Cooling, Trapping, and Coherent Con- trol of Strontium Monofluoride Molecules, Ph.D. thesis, University of Chicago (2025)

    2025

  66. [66]

    H. J. Williams, L. Caldwell, N. J. Fitch, S. Truppe, J. Rodewald, E. A. Hinds, B. E. Sauer, and M. R. Tar- butt, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 163201 (2018)

    2018

  67. [67]

    Y. Bao, S. S. Yu, L. Anderegg, E. Chae, W. Ketterle, K.-K. Ni, and J. M. Doyle, Science382, 1138 (2023)

    2023

  68. [68]

    Anderegg, N

    L. Anderegg, N. B. Vilas, C. Hallas, P. Robichaud, A. Jadbabaie, J. M. Doyle, and N. R. Hutzler, Science 382, 665 (2023)

    2023

  69. [69]

    Norrgard,Magneto-optical trapping of diatomic molecules, Ph.D

    E. Norrgard,Magneto-optical trapping of diatomic molecules, Ph.D. thesis, Yale University (2016)

    2016

  70. [70]

    Colarusso, B

    P. Colarusso, B. Guo, K.-Q. Zhang, and P. Bernath, Jour- nal of Molecular Spectroscopy175, 158 (1996)

    1996

  71. [71]

    Jorapur,Towards a Bose-Einstein Condensate of SrF Molecules, Ph.D

    V. Jorapur,Towards a Bose-Einstein Condensate of SrF Molecules, Ph.D. thesis, Yale University (2024)

    2024

  72. [72]

    eEDM collaboration, P

    N. eEDM collaboration, P. Aggarwal, H. L. Bethlem, A. Borschevsky, M. Denis, K. Esajas, P. A. Haase, Y. Hao, S. Hoekstra, K. Jungmann,et al., The European Physical Journal D72, 1 (2018)

    2018

  73. [73]

    Verma, A

    M. Verma, A. M. Jayich, and A. C. Vutha, Physical Re- view Letters125, 153201 (2020)

    2020

  74. [74]

    E. S. Shuman, J. F. Barry, D. R. Glenn, and D. DeMille, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 223001 (2009)

    2009

  75. [75]

    Tanji-Suzuki, I

    H. Tanji-Suzuki, I. D. Leroux, M. H. Schleier-Smith, M. Cetina, A. T. Grier, J. Simon, and V. Vuleti´ c, in Advances in Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, Advances In Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, Vol. 60, edited by E. Arimondo, P. Berman, and C. Lin (Academic Press, 2011) pp. 201–237

    2011

  76. [76]

    Duan,Enhanced light-atom interaction in an optical resonator, Ph.D

    Y. Duan,Enhanced light-atom interaction in an optical resonator, Ph.D. thesis (2020)

    2020

  77. [77]

    Zhang, R

    H. Zhang, R. McConnell, S. ´Cuk, Q. Lin, M. H. Schleier- Smith, I. D. Leroux, and V. Vuleti´ c, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 133603 (2012)

    2012

  78. [78]

    Z. Chen, J. G. Bohnet, J. M. Weiner, K. C. Cox, and J. K. Thompson, Physical Review A89, 043837 (2014)

    2014

  79. [79]

    Z. Li, B. Braverman, S. Colombo, C. Shu, A. Kawasaki, A. F. Adiyatullin, E. Pedrozo-Pe˜ nafiel, E. Mendez, and V. Vuleti´ c, PRX Quantum3, 020308 (2022)

    2022

  80. [80]

    T. E. Wall, J. F. Kanem, J. J. Hudson, B. E. Sauer, D. Cho, M. G. Boshier, E. A. Hinds, and M. R. Tarbutt, Phys. Rev. A78, 062509 (2008)

    2008

Showing first 80 references.