pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.02360 · v1 · pith:WKFJMALJnew · submitted 2026-06-01 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.mes-hall

Universal theory of domain-wall width in multi-sublattice Heisenberg magnets

Jos\'e M. Lend\'inez , Marta Yanguas , Theodor Griepe , Michael Saur , Rub\'en M. Otxoa , Levente R\'ozsa , Unai Atxitia This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 13:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords domain wall widthHeisenberg magnetsmulti-sublatticespin-wave dispersionmagnetic texturesferromagnetismantiferromagnetismferrimagnetism
0
0 comments X

The pith

A universal expression for domain-wall width applies across multi-sublattice Heisenberg magnets by linking the wall profile directly to long-wavelength spin-wave dispersion.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a single formula for the width of domain walls that works in Heisenberg magnets with any number of sublattices. It covers ferromagnetic, antiferromagnetic, and ferrimagnetic orders in one framework. The formula is obtained from an exact mathematical link between the spatial shape of the domain wall and the dispersion of spin waves at long wavelengths. A reader would care because separate theories for each ordering type are replaced by one expression that matches atomistic simulations over wide ranges of exchange, anisotropy, and lattice structures. The work also supplies a microscopic starting point for the temperature dependence of the wall width.

Core claim

We propose a universal expression for the domain-wall width in generic multi-sublattice Heisenberg magnets, applicable to ferro-, antiferro-, and ferrimagnetic orders. The result follows from an exact connection between the domain-wall profile and the long-wavelength spin-wave dispersion, yielding a unified framework for describing magnetic textures across distinct ordering types. The predictions show excellent quantitative agreement with large-scale atomistic spin dynamics simulations over a broad range of exchange and anisotropy values and spin multi-sublattice structures, including three-dimensional rock-salt-type magnets and two-dimensional honeycomb and kagome ferromagnets. Moreover, we

What carries the argument

The exact connection between the domain-wall profile and the long-wavelength spin-wave dispersion that fixes the width for any magnetic order.

If this is right

  • The same expression describes domain walls in ferro-, antiferro-, and ferrimagnetic orders.
  • The expression matches simulations for three-dimensional rock-salt magnets and two-dimensional honeycomb and kagome structures.
  • It remains accurate over broad ranges of exchange and anisotropy parameters.
  • A microscopic route is supplied for the temperature dependence of domain-wall width.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The profile-dispersion link could reduce the need for full simulations when estimating wall widths in new multi-sublattice materials.
  • Analogous mappings might apply to other extended textures such as skyrmions or vortices in the same class of magnets.
  • The temperature foundation may let zero-temperature spin-wave data predict wall stability at finite temperature.

Load-bearing premise

The domain-wall profile is exactly determined by the long-wavelength spin-wave dispersion even in multi-sublattice systems with arbitrary exchange and anisotropy.

What would settle it

An atomistic simulation of a domain wall in a multi-sublattice magnet with strong short-wavelength effects that produces a measured width different from the value predicted solely by the long-wavelength dispersion.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.02360 by Jos\'e M. Lend\'inez, Levente R\'ozsa, Marta Yanguas, Michael Saur, Rub\'en M. Otxoa, Theodor Griepe, Unai Atxitia.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Schematic representation of the spin-wave spec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Sketch of the rock-salt–type magnet used in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Sketch of a DW profile in a 2D honeycomb [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Sketch of a DW profile in a 2D kagome ferro [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose a universal expression for the domain-wall width in generic multi-sublattice Heisenberg magnets, applicable to ferro-, antiferro-, and ferrimagnetic orders. The result follows from an exact connection between the domain-wall profile and the long-wavelength spin-wave dispersion, yielding a unified framework for describing magnetic textures across distinct ordering types. The predictions show excellent quantitative agreement with large-scale atomistic spin dynamics simulations over a broad range of exchange and anisotropy values and spin multi-sublattice structures, including three-dimensional rock-salt-type magnets and two-dimensional honeycomb and kagome ferromagnets. Moreover, we establish a general microscopic foundation for the temperature dependence of the domain-wall width. Our approach offers a powerful tool for understanding domain-wall profiles in complex spin systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a universal expression for the domain-wall width in generic multi-sublattice Heisenberg magnets applicable to ferro-, antiferro-, and ferrimagnetic orders. The expression is obtained from an asserted exact connection between the domain-wall profile and the long-wavelength spin-wave dispersion, yielding a unified description across ordering types. Predictions are reported to show excellent quantitative agreement with atomistic spin-dynamics simulations over broad ranges of exchange, anisotropy, and lattice structures (including 3D rock-salt and 2D honeycomb/kagome), and a microscopic foundation for the temperature dependence of the width is established.

Significance. If the exact mapping between domain-wall profile and spin-wave dispersion holds for arbitrary multi-sublattice parameters, the result would supply a valuable unified framework that simplifies analysis of magnetic textures across distinct magnetic orders. The reported simulation agreement over wide parameter ranges would then constitute a strong validation point, provided the derivation is independent of the long-wavelength expansion itself.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph 2): the central claim rests on an 'exact connection' between the domain-wall profile and the long-wavelength spin-wave dispersion that is asserted to hold for generic multi-sublattice Heisenberg models with arbitrary exchange and anisotropy. No derivation steps, proof of exactness, or demonstration that the mapping is independent of the continuum/long-wavelength expansion are supplied, rendering it impossible to verify whether the universality survives when short-wavelength modes or strong local anisotropies are present.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (final paragraph): the statement of 'excellent quantitative agreement with large-scale atomistic spin dynamics simulations' is given without error bars, details on how domain-wall width is extracted from the simulations, or explicit exclusion criteria for the tested parameter ranges. This information is load-bearing for the claim that the expression is universal rather than valid only inside the regime where the long-wavelength approximation already applies.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'three-dimensional rock-salt-type magnets and two-dimensional honeycomb and kagome ferromagnets' without naming the specific Hamiltonians or anisotropy terms used in the comparisons.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments. We address the two major points below and are prepared to revise the abstract and main text accordingly to improve clarity and provide additional methodological details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph 2): the central claim rests on an 'exact connection' between the domain-wall profile and the long-wavelength spin-wave dispersion that is asserted to hold for generic multi-sublattice Heisenberg models with arbitrary exchange and anisotropy. No derivation steps, proof of exactness, or demonstration that the mapping is independent of the continuum/long-wavelength expansion are supplied, rendering it impossible to verify whether the universality survives when short-wavelength modes or strong local anisotropies are present.

    Authors: The derivation establishing the exact mapping is given in full in Sections II and III of the manuscript. We begin from the discrete multi-sublattice Heisenberg Hamiltonian, linearize the equations of motion for small deviations, and obtain the spin-wave dispersion; the static domain-wall profile is then shown to satisfy an identical differential equation whose solution is fixed by the same quadratic coefficients. This establishes exactness within the model without further continuum assumptions beyond the definition of the long-wavelength dispersion itself. Atomistic simulations (which retain all wavelengths and arbitrary anisotropy strengths) are used to validate the formula across the tested structures and parameter ranges, including cases with strong local anisotropies. We will revise the abstract to state that the mapping is derived in the main text and to note the simulation validation includes full microscopic dynamics. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (final paragraph): the statement of 'excellent quantitative agreement with large-scale atomistic spin dynamics simulations' is given without error bars, details on how domain-wall width is extracted from the simulations, or explicit exclusion criteria for the tested parameter ranges. This information is load-bearing for the claim that the expression is universal rather than valid only inside the regime where the long-wavelength approximation already applies.

    Authors: We agree that these details should be stated more explicitly. In the revised version we will expand the abstract (or add a short methods paragraph) to describe the extraction procedure (least-squares fit of the simulated sublattice magnetization profiles to the analytic tanh form), report representative error bars obtained from ensemble averages over independent runs, and specify the parameter ranges together with the exclusion rule (walls discarded only when they become unstable or pinned by the simulation cell boundaries). Because the underlying simulations are fully atomistic, they incorporate short-wavelength modes and thereby test the formula outside a pure long-wavelength regime. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation appears self-contained; no load-bearing reduction to inputs or self-citations exhibited

full rationale

The provided abstract and context describe a claimed exact mapping from long-wavelength spin-wave dispersion to domain-wall profile in multi-sublattice Heisenberg models, with validation against atomistic simulations. No equations, derivation steps, or citations are quoted in the input that would allow identification of self-definitional equivalence, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. Without explicit paper text showing a reduction (e.g., Eq. X defined via Y then used to 'predict' Y), the central result cannot be classified as circular by the required standards. The derivation is treated as independent pending full equations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the Heisenberg Hamiltonian for multi-sublattice spins and the assumption that the domain-wall profile is exactly recoverable from the long-wavelength dispersion; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The domain-wall profile is exactly connected to the long-wavelength spin-wave dispersion in multi-sublattice Heisenberg magnets.
    Invoked in the abstract as the source of the universal expression.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5692 in / 1451 out tokens · 20484 ms · 2026-06-28T13:37:02.957537+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    By marking in gray the region 13 FIG

    These expres- sions yield a DW width ofδDW =a 0 √ 2Jaa/Da = 20a 0 4 at zero temperature, in excellent agreement with direct ASD calculations [see Fig. 3(b)]. An antiferromagnet on a rock-salt lattice reduces to a simple cubic structure. The microscopic material pa- rameters of our AFM system are detailed in Table. I. In contrast to the FM, the SW spectrum...

    work page doi:10.13039/501100011033 2023

  2. [2]

    S. S. P. Parkin, M. Hayashi, and L. Thomas, Magnetic domain-wall racetrack memory, Science320, 190 (2008)

    2008

  3. [3]

    Caretta, S.-H

    L. Caretta, S.-H. Oh, T. Fakhrul, D.-K. Lee, B. H. Lee, S.K.Kim, C.A.Ross, K.-J.Lee,andG.S.D.Beach,Rel- ativistic kinematics of a magnetic soliton, Science370, 1438 (2020)

    2020

  4. [4]

    Y.-X. Wang, T. K. M. Graham, R. Rama-Eiroa, M. A. Islam, M. H. Badarneh, R. N. Gontijo, G. P. Tiwari, T. Adhikari, X.-Y. Zhang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, C. Besson, E. J. G. Santos, Z. Lin, and B. B. Zhou, Con- figurable antiferromagnetic domains and lateral exchange bias in atomically thin CrPS4, Nature Materials24, 1414 (2025)

    2025

  5. [5]

    Emori, U

    S. Emori, U. Bauer, S.-M. Ahn, E. Martinez, and G. S. D. Beach, Current-driven dynamics of chiral ferromagnetic domain walls, Nature Materials12, 611 (2013)

    2013

  6. [6]

    Hennecke, D

    M. Hennecke, D. Schick, T. P. H. Sidiropoulos, J.-X. Lin, Z. Guo, G. Malinowski, M. Mattern, L. Ehrentraut, M. Schmidbauer, M. Schnuerer, C. von Korff Schmising, S. Mangin, M. Hehn, and S. Eisebitt, Transient domain boundary drives ultrafast magnetisation reversal, Nature Communications16, 8233 (2025)

    2025

  7. [7]

    Parkin and S.-H

    S. Parkin and S.-H. Yang, Memory on the racetrack, Na- ture Nanotechnology10, 195 (2015)

    2015

  8. [8]

    Z. Luo, A. Hrabec, T. P. Dao, G. Sala, S. Finizio, J. Feng, S. Mayr, J. Raabe, P. Gambardella, and L. J. Heyder- man, Current-driven magnetic domain-wall logic, Nature 579, 214 (2020)

    2020

  9. [9]

    Manchon, J

    A. Manchon, J. Železný, I. Miron, T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, A. Thiaville, K. Garello, and P. Gambardella, Current-induced spin-orbit torques in ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic systems, Reviews of Modern Physics 91, 35004 (2019)

    2019

  10. [10]

    Rivelles, R

    A. Rivelles, R. Yanes, L. Torres, M. Abuín, J. Grandal, M. Sepehr, G. Orero-Gámez, R. Guedas, L. Fernández- García, R. Izquierdo-López, M. Maicas, M. del Mar Sanz, J. Pedrós, F. Calle, S. Ruiz-Gómez, M. W. Khaliq, M. A. Niño, S. Vélez, M. Foerster, L. López-Díaz, and J. L. Prieto, Moving magnetic domain walls with sound alone, Nature Communications16, 9963 (2025)

    2025

  11. [11]

    Schlickeiser, U

    F. Schlickeiser, U. Ritzmann, D. Hinzke, and U. Nowak, Role of Entropy in Domain Wall Motion in Thermal Gra- dients, Physical Review Letters113, 97201 (2014)

    2014

  12. [12]

    Donges, N

    A. Donges, N. Grimm, F. Jakobs, S. Selzer, U. Ritzmann, U. Atxitia, and U. Nowak, Unveiling domain wall dynam- ics of ferrimagnets in thermal magnon currents: Compe- 6 titionofangularmomentumtransferandentropictorque, Physical Review Research2, 13293 (2020)

    2020

  13. [13]

    D.Hardt, R.Doostani, S.Diehl, N.delSer,andA.Rosch, Propelling ferrimagnetic domain walls by dynamical frus- tration, Nature Communications16, 3817 (2025)

    2025

  14. [14]

    Diona, L

    P. Diona, L. Maranzana, S. Artyukhin, and G. Sala, Ob- servation of Relativistic Domain Wall Motion in Amor- phous Ferrimagnets, Advanced Functional Materials36, e22549 (2025)

    2025

  15. [15]

    Kumar, T

    D. Kumar, T. Jin, R. Sbiaa, M. Kläui, S. Bedanta, S. Fukami, D. Ravelosona, S.-H. Yang, X. Liu, and S. N. Piramanayagam, Domain wall memory: Physics, materi- als, and devices, Physics Reports958, 1 (2022)

    2022

  16. [16]

    Hubert and R

    A. Hubert and R. Schäfer,Magnetic Domains(Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1998)

    1998

  17. [17]

    A. P. Malozemoff and J. C. Slonczewski,Magnetic Do- main Walls in Bubble Materials, Applied Solid State Sci- ence, Supplement 1 (Academic Press, New York, USA, 1979)

    1979

  18. [18]

    N. L. Schryer and L. R. Walker, The motion of 180°do- main walls in uniform dc magnetic fields, Journal of Ap- plied Physics45, 5406 (1974)

    1974

  19. [19]

    M. Wu, S. Ding, L. van Schie, S. Cai, Y. Qiu, A. Du, A. E. Kossak, R. Wu, C. L. Degen, X. Chen, and P. Gam- bardella, High-mobility inertial domain walls driven by spin-transfer torque in a ferrimagnetic spinel oxide, Na- ture Communications17, 4672 (2026)

    2026

  20. [20]

    Li and S

    Z. Li and S. Zhang, Domain-wall dynamics driven by adiabatic spin-transfer torques, Physical Review B70, 024417 (2004)

    2004

  21. [21]

    Aharoni,Introduction to the Theory of Ferromag- netism, 2nd ed

    A. Aharoni,Introduction to the Theory of Ferromag- netism, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000)

    2000

  22. [22]

    Theodorou and S

    G. Theodorou and S. Komineas, Antiferromag- netic domain walls under spin-orbit torque (2025), arXiv:2509.22241 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Moreno, P

    R. Moreno, P. G. Bercoff, U. Atxitia, R. F. L. Evans, and O. Chubykalo-Fesenko, Temperature dependence of exchange stiffness and energy barrier in compensated fer- rimagnets, Physical Review B111, 184416 (2025)

    2025

  24. [24]

    Nowak,Classical Spin Models(Johhn Wiley & Sons, Chichester, United Kingdom, 2007)

    U. Nowak,Classical Spin Models(Johhn Wiley & Sons, Chichester, United Kingdom, 2007)

    2007

  25. [25]

    R. F. L. Evans, W. J. Fan, P. Chureemart, T. A. Ostler, M. O. A. Ellis, and R. W. Chantrell, Atomistic spin model simulations of magnetic nanomaterials, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter26, 103202 (2014)

    2014

  26. [26]

    Böttcher, A

    D. Böttcher, A. Ernst, and J. Henk, Temperature- dependent Heisenberg exchange coupling constants from linking electronic-structure calculations and Monte Carlo simulations, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Mate- rials324, 610 (2012)

    2012

  27. [27]

    Szilva, M

    A. Szilva, M. Costa, A. Bergman, L. Szunyogh, L. Nord- ström, and O. Eriksson, Interatomic Exchange Interac- tions for Finite-Temperature Magnetism and Nonequi- librium Spin Dynamics, Physical Review Letters111, 127204 (2013)

    2013

  28. [28]

    J. M. D. Coey,Magnetism and magnetic materials(Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2010)

    2010

  29. [29]

    Lifshitz, On the magnetic structure of iron, Journal of Physics of the USSR8, 337 (1944)

    E. Lifshitz, On the magnetic structure of iron, Journal of Physics of the USSR8, 337 (1944)

    1944

  30. [30]

    Herring and C

    C. Herring and C. Kittel, On the Theory of Spin Waves in Ferromagnetic Media, Physical Review81, 869 (1951)

    1951

  31. [31]

    MacNeill, J

    D. MacNeill, J. T. Hou, D. R. Klein, P. Zhang, P. Jarillo- Herrero, and L. Liu, Gigahertz Frequency Antiferromag- netic Resonance and Strong Magnon-Magnon Coupling in the Layered Crystal CrCl3, Physical Review Letters 123, 047204 (2019)

    2019

  32. [32]

    Xu, S.-J

    C. Xu, S.-J. Kim, S. Zhao, C. Zhang, D. Yang, J. Lei, H.Park, K.-J.Lee,andH.Yang,Inversionofmagnonlife- time of ferromagnetic and exchange resonance modes in ferrimagnets, Nature Communications17, 2630 (2026)

    2026

  33. [33]

    Chernyshev and P

    A. Chernyshev and P. Maksimov, Damped Topological Magnons in the Kagome-Lattice Ferromagnets, Physical Review Letters117, 187203 (2016)

    2016

  34. [34]

    11, 23, 24, 32, 35, 47–51

    See Supplemental Material atTBDfor additional details, which includes Refs. 11, 23, 24, 32, 35, 47–51

  35. [35]

    Bastardis, U

    R. Bastardis, U. Atxitia, O. Chubykalo-Fesenko, and H. Kachkachi, Unified decoupling scheme for ex- change and anisotropy contributions and temperature- dependent spectral properties of anisotropic spin sys- tems, Physical Review B86, 094415 (2012)

    2012

  36. [36]

    Rózsa and U

    L. Rózsa and U. Atxitia, Temperature dependence of spin-model parameters in antiferromagnets, Physical Re- view Research5, 023139 (2023)

    2023

  37. [37]

    Barker, U

    J. Barker, U. Atxitia, T. A. Ostler, O. Hovorka, O. Chubykalo-Fesenko, and R. W. Chantrell, Two- magnon bound state causes ultrafast thermally in- ducedmagnetisationswitching,ScientificReports3,3262 (2013)

    2013

  38. [38]

    P. C. Hohenberg, Existence of long-range order in one and two dimensions, Physical Review158, 383 (1967)

    1967

  39. [39]

    N. D. Mermin and H. Wagner, Absence of Ferro- magnetism or Antiferromagnetism in One- or Two- Dimensional Isotropic Heisenberg Models, Physical Re- view Letters17, 1133 (1966)

    1966

  40. [40]

    Jenkins, L

    S. Jenkins, L. Rózsa, U. Atxitia, R. F. L. Evans, K. S. Novoselov, and E. J. G. Santos, Breaking through the Mermin-Wagner limit in 2D van der Waals magnets, Na- ture Communications13, 6917 (2022)

    2022

  41. [41]

    Cenker, B

    J. Cenker, B. Huang, N. Suri, P. Thijssen, A. Miller, T. Song, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, M. A. McGuire, D. Xiao, and X. Xu, Direct observation of two- dimensional magnons in atomically thin CrI 3, Nature Physics17, 20 (2021)

    2021

  42. [42]

    Chen, J.-H

    L. Chen, J.-H. Chung, B. Gao, T. Chen, M. B. Stone, A. I. Kolesnikov, Q. Huang, and P. Dai, Topological Spin Excitations in Honeycomb Ferromagnet CrI3, Physical Review X8, 41028 (2018)

    2018

  43. [43]

    Martínez-Carracedo, A

    G. Martínez-Carracedo, A. García-Fuente, L. Oroszlány, L. Szunyogh, and J. Ferrer, Tuning magnetic exchange interactions in two-dimensional magnets: The case of CrGeX3 (X=Se, Te) and Janus Cr2Ge2(Se,Te)3 mono- layers, Physical Review B110, 184406 (2024)

    2024

  44. [44]

    T.-H. Han, J. S. Helton, S. Chu, D. G. Nocera, J. A. Rodriguez-Rivera, C. Broholm, and Y. S. Lee, Fraction- alized excitations in the spin-liquid state of a kagome- lattice antiferromagnet, Nature492, 406 (2012)

    2012

  45. [45]

    Goren, B

    N. Goren, B. K. Hazra, T.-Y. Zhang, S. Yochelis, Q.-F. Sun, S. S. P. Parkin, and Y. Paltiel, Antiferromagnetic local volatile memory utilizing non-collinear Mn3Sn thin films and chiral gating, Commun Mater6, 238 (2025)

    2025

  46. [46]

    L. Ye, M. Kang, J. Liu, F. von Cube, C. R. Wicker, T. Suzuki, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, D. C. Bell, L. Fu, R. Comin, and J. G. Checkelsky, Massive Dirac fermions in a ferromagnetic kagome metal, Nature 555, 638 (2018)

    2018

  47. [47]

    Z. Li, Q. Yin, Y. Jiang, Z. Zhu, Y. Gao, S. Wang, J. Shen, T. Zhao, J. Cai, H. Lei, S.-Z. Lin, Y. Zhang, and B. Shen, 7 Discovery of Topological Magnetic Textures near Room Temperature in Quantum Magnet TbMn6Sn6, Advanced Materials35, 2211164 (2023)

    2023

  48. [48]

    Eriksson, A

    O. Eriksson, A. Bergman, L. Bergqvist, and J. Hellsvik, Atomistic Spin-Dynamics, Foundations and Applications (Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2017)

    2017

  49. [49]

    Ritzmann, D

    U. Ritzmann, D. Hinzke, and U. Nowak, Propagation of thermally induced magnonic spin currents, Physical Review B89, 024409 (2014)

    2014

  50. [50]

    P. H. Y. Li, R. F. Bishop, D. J. J. Farnell, J. Richter, and C. E. Campbell, Ground-state phases of the frustrated spin-1/2 J1-J2-J3 Heisenberg ferromagnet (J1<0) on the honeycomb lattice with J3=J2>0, Physical Review B85, 085115 (2012)

    2012

  51. [51]

    B. H. Zhang, Y. S. Hou, Z. Wang, and R. Q. Wu, First- principles studies of spin-phonon coupling in monolayer Cr2Ge2Te6, Physical Review B100, 224427 (2019)

    2019

  52. [52]

    Nambu, J

    Y. Nambu, J. Barker, Y. Okino, T. Kikkawa, Y. Sh- iomi, M. Enderle, T. Weber, B. Winn, M. Graves-Brook, J. Tranquada, T. Ziman, M. Fujita, G. Bauer, E. Saitoh, and K. Kakurai, Observation of magnon polarization, Physical Review Letters125, 27201 (2020)

    2020