pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.02391 · v1 · pith:2WXENPKBnew · submitted 2026-06-01 · ✦ hep-th · cond-mat.stat-mech· cond-mat.str-el

Boulder Lectures on Thermal Dynamics and Hydrodynamic EFTs

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 13:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th cond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-el
keywords fluctuating hydrodynamicseffective field theoryspontaneous symmetry breakingthermal dynamicstransport coefficientsgeneralized symmetriest Hooft anomaliesUV/IR constraints
0
0 comments X

The pith

Fluctuating hydrodynamics emerges in nearly all local many-body systems at finite temperature through effective field theories organized by strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry breaking.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents lectures that organize the equilibrium and out-of-equilibrium dynamics of thermalizing systems around the emergence of fluctuating hydrodynamics. It shows how modern EFT constructions achieve this by framing the process as strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry breaking. The approach applies across examples from spin chains to relativistic quantum field theories, including cases with generalized symmetries and 't Hooft anomalies. It further derives UV/IR constraints on the transport parameters that serve as Wilson coefficients in these hydrodynamic EFTs.

Core claim

Fluctuating hydrodynamics emerges in essentially any local many-body system at nonzero temperature, and modern EFT constructions frame this emergence through the lens of strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry breaking, enabling quantitative study of late-time observables in systems with generalized symmetries or 't Hooft anomalies while yielding UV/IR constraints on transport parameters both in the continuum and on the lattice.

What carries the argument

strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry breaking, the organizing principle that constructs the hydrodynamic EFT by breaking symmetries from strong (UV) to weak (IR) form.

If this is right

  • Late-time observables become calculable in a controlled way for spin chains, relativistic QFTs, and models with generalized symmetries or anomalies.
  • Transport parameters obey specific UV/IR relations that hold both in continuum theories and on the lattice.
  • The same EFT construction supplies quantitative predictions for out-of-equilibrium dynamics in thermalizing systems.
  • Wilson coefficients of the hydrodynamic EFT can be constrained by matching to microscopic UV data.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The framework could be used to derive hydrodynamic descriptions for systems whose symmetries are not yet fully classified.
  • Lattice simulations of spin chains could directly test the predicted relations among transport coefficients.
  • Extensions to systems with explicit breaking or to lower dimensions might reveal where the strong-to-weak paradigm requires additional terms.

Load-bearing premise

The strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry breaking supplies a controlled and uniform framework that works for all the listed systems without extra uncontrolled approximations.

What would settle it

A concrete local many-body system at nonzero temperature in which late-time observables cannot be captured by any EFT built on strong-to-weak symmetry breaking, or in which the predicted UV/IR relations among transport coefficients are violated.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.02391 by Luca V. Delacretaz.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Global equilibrium is reached after a time scale that grows with volume in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Schwinger-Keldysh contour with sources. Time increases from left to right. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) On-shell condition for the two internal legs, leading to a branch point at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Density two-point function ⟨n(t, x)n⟩ in a classical lattice gas from early times (blue) to late times (yellow), against the scaling variable y = x/√ Dt. In this model, χ(n) and D(n) are known analytically, so that the leading (F0,0) and subleading 1-loop (F1,0) EFT predictions from (4.37) are completely fixed. (a) Approximate scaling collapse of C(t, y) ≡ √ t⟨n(t, y)n⟩ towards the leading scaling function… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Original Schwinger-Keldysh contour (left) and its adaptations for the SFF (center) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) Hydrodynamics cannot emerge too soon or it would violate microcausality [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p047_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Fluctuating hydrodynamics emerges in essentially any local many-body system at nonzero temperature. Effective field theory (EFT) approaches enable the quantitative study of this emergence, providing a controlled framework to capture late-time observables. These lectures introduce the organizing principles behind equilibrium and out-of-equilibrium dynamics in these thermalizing systems. A central focus is the modern construction of these EFTs, which frames fluctuating hydrodynamics through the lens of "strong-to-weak" spontaneous symmetry breaking. Drawing examples from both high-energy and condensed matter physics, we show how this paradigm adapts to systems ranging from spin chains to relativistic quantum field theories, including models with generalized symmetries or symmetries with 't Hooft anomalies. Finally, we discuss UV/IR constraints on transport parameters -- viewed as the Wilson coefficients of hydrodynamic EFTs -- both in continuum and on the lattice.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript consists of lecture notes introducing the organizing principles of equilibrium and out-of-equilibrium dynamics in thermalizing many-body systems at nonzero temperature. It centers on constructing effective field theories for fluctuating hydrodynamics through the strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry breaking paradigm, with examples drawn from spin chains, relativistic quantum field theories, systems with generalized symmetries, and those exhibiting 't Hooft anomalies. The notes conclude by discussing UV/IR constraints on transport parameters, treated as Wilson coefficients of the hydrodynamic EFTs.

Significance. If the exposition is accurate and accessible, these lectures could provide a useful synthesis of the strong-to-weak SSB framework for hydrodynamic EFTs, helping researchers connect concepts across high-energy and condensed-matter contexts. The emphasis on adaptability to generalized symmetries and anomalies, together with the treatment of transport coefficients as EFT Wilson coefficients, offers a coherent organizing perspective on late-time observables without introducing new theorems or quantitative predictions.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract refers to 'modern construction' of the EFTs but does not specify which sections contain the explicit symmetry-breaking pattern or the mapping to hydrodynamic variables; adding a short roadmap paragraph after the introduction would improve navigability for readers.
  2. When discussing lattice versus continuum UV/IR constraints, the notes should explicitly note whether any example calculations are provided or whether the discussion remains at the level of general principles.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and their recommendation to accept. We are pleased that the lectures are viewed as providing a useful synthesis of the strong-to-weak SSB framework across high-energy and condensed-matter contexts.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; expository review of existing framework

full rationale

The document is a set of lecture notes that organizes and reviews the strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry breaking construction for hydrodynamic EFTs, drawing on prior literature across spin chains, relativistic QFTs, and systems with generalized symmetries. No new central derivation, theorem, or quantitative prediction is advanced whose validity would reduce to a fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or definitional equivalence within the text itself. All load-bearing steps are presented as summaries of independently established results rather than as self-contained derivations that collapse by construction. The paper therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only; no explicit free parameters, new axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the summary. The framework rests on standard EFT and symmetry-breaking assumptions already present in the cited literature.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Spontaneous symmetry breaking can be applied in the strong-to-weak sense to describe the emergence of hydrodynamics in thermal systems.
    Invoked as the central organizing principle for the EFT construction.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5669 in / 1153 out tokens · 21843 ms · 2026-06-28T13:34:46.691026+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Hydrodynamic tails in chaotic spin chains with quantum group symmetry

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Quantum group symmetry enables superdiffusive hydrodynamic tails for transverse spin operators in chaotic XXZ-like models despite lacking local quantum group charges.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

136 extracted references · 63 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Polchinski, Effective field theory and the Fermi surface, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute (TASI 92): From Black Holes and Strings to Particles, pp

    J. Polchinski, Effective field theory and the Fermi surface, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute (TASI 92): From Black Holes and Strings to Particles, pp. 0235–276, 1992. [arXiv:hep-th/9210046]

  2. [2]

    Penco, An Introduction to Effective Field Theories, 2020, [arXiv:2006.16285 [hep-th]]

    R. Penco, An Introduction to Effective Field Theories, 2020, [arXiv:2006.16285 [hep-th]]

  3. [3]

    Forster,Hydrodynamic Fluctuations, Broken Symmetry, and Correlation Functions, vol

    D. Forster,Hydrodynamic Fluctuations, Broken Symmetry, and Correlation Functions, vol. 47 ofFrontiers in Physics. W. A. Benjamin, Inc., Reading, Massachusetts, 1975

  4. [4]

    P. M. Chaikin, T. C. Lubensky and T. A. Witten,Principles of condensed matter physics, vol. 10. Cambridge university press Cambridge, 1995

  5. [5]

    S. A. Hartnoll, A. Lucas and S. Sachdev,Holographic quantum matter, MIT Press, 2018, [arXiv:1612.07324]

  6. [6]

    Kovtun, Lectures on hydrodynamic fluctuations in relativistic theories, J

    P. Kovtun, Lectures on hydrodynamic fluctuations in relativistic theories, J. Phys. A45, 473001, 2012, [arXiv:1205.5040 [hep-th]]

  7. [7]

    Liu and P

    H. Liu and P. Glorioso, Lectures on non-equilibrium effective field theories and fluctuating hydrodynamics, PoSTASI2017, 008, 2018, [arXiv:1805.09331 [hep-th]]

  8. [8]

    L. M. Sieberer, M. Buchhold, J. Marino and S. Diehl, Universality in driven open quantum matter, 2023, [arXiv:2312.03073 [cond-mat.stat-mech]]

  9. [9]

    P. C. Hohenberg and B. I. Halperin, Theory of Dynamic Critical Phenomena, Rev. Mod. Phys. 49, 435–479, 1977

  10. [10]

    N. Chai, S. Chaudhuri, C. Choi, Z. Komargodski, E. Rabinovici and M. Smolkin, Thermal Order in Conformal Theories, Phys. Rev. D102, 065014, 2020, [arXiv:2005.03676 [hep-th]]

  11. [11]

    Jensen, M

    K. Jensen, M. Kaminski, P. Kovtun, R. Meyer, A. Ritz and A. Yarom, Towards hydrodynamics without an entropy current, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 101601, 2012, [arXiv:1203.3556 [hep-th]]

  12. [12]

    Banerjee, J

    N. Banerjee, J. Bhattacharya, S. Bhattacharyya, S. Jain, S. Minwalla and T. Sharma, Constraints on Fluid Dynamics from Equilibrium Partition Functions, JHEP09, 046, 2012, [arXiv:1203.3544 [hep-th]]

  13. [13]

    Baier, P

    R. Baier, P. Romatschke, D. T. Son, A. O. Starinets and M. A. Stephanov, Relativistic viscous hydrodynamics, conformal invariance, and holography, JHEP04, 100, 2008, [arXiv:0712.2451 [hep-th]]

  14. [14]

    Benjamin, J

    N. Benjamin, J. Lee, H. Ooguri and D. Simmons-Duffin, Universal asymptotics for high energy CFT data, JHEP03, 115, 2024, [arXiv:2306.08031 [hep-th]]

  15. [15]

    Romatschke and D

    P. Romatschke and D. T. Son, Spectral sum rules for the quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. D 80, 065021, 2009, [arXiv:0903.3946 [hep-ph]]. 52

  16. [16]

    Adams, N

    A. Adams, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dubovsky, A. Nicolis and R. Rattazzi, Causality, analyticity and an IR obstruction to UV completion, JHEP10, 014, 2006, [arXiv:hep-th/0602178]

  17. [17]

    L. V. Delacretaz, A. L. Fitzpatrick, E. Katz and M. T. Walters, Thermalization and hydrodynamics of two-dimensional quantum field theories, SciPost Phys.12, 119, 2022, [arXiv:2105.02229 [hep-th]]

  18. [18]

    Sachdev, Polylogarithm identities in a conformal field theory in three-dimensions, Phys

    S. Sachdev, Polylogarithm identities in a conformal field theory in three-dimensions, Phys. Lett. B309, 285–288, 1993, [arXiv:hep-th/9305131]

  19. [19]

    Policastro, D

    G. Policastro, D. T. Son and A. O. Starinets, From AdS / CFT correspondence to hydrodynamics. 2. Sound waves, JHEP12, 054, 2002, [arXiv:hep-th/0210220]

  20. [20]

    A. D. Linde, Infrared Problem in Thermodynamics of the Yang-Mills Gas, Phys. Lett. B96, 289–292, 1980

  21. [21]

    Braaten and R

    E. Braaten and R. D. Pisarski, Soft Amplitudes in Hot Gauge Theories: A General Analysis, Nucl. Phys. B337, 569–634, 1990

  22. [22]

    J. I. Kapusta and C. Gale,Finite-temperature field theory: Principles and applications. Cambridge university press, 2007

  23. [23]

    Braaten, Solution to the perturbative infrared catastrophe of hot gauge theories, Phys

    E. Braaten, Solution to the perturbative infrared catastrophe of hot gauge theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.74, 2164–2167, 1995, [arXiv:hep-ph/9409434]

  24. [24]

    Komargodski and F

    Z. Komargodski and F. K. Popov, Temperature-Resistant Order in 2+1 Dimensions, 2024, [arXiv:2412.09459 [hep-th]]

  25. [25]

    Hartman, S

    T. Hartman, S. Jain and S. Kundu, Causality Constraints in Conformal Field Theory, JHEP 05, 099, 2016, [arXiv:1509.00014 [hep-th]]

  26. [26]

    A. A. Abrikosov, L. P. Gorkov and I. E. Dzyaloshinski,Methods of quantum field theory in statistical physics. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1963

  27. [27]

    A. V. Chubukov and D. L. Maslov, Nonanalytic corrections to the fermi-liquid behavior, Phys. Rev. B68, 155113, 2003, [arXiv:cond-mat/0305022]

  28. [28]

    L. M. Sieberer, A. Chiocchetta, A. Gambassi, U. C. T¨ auber and S. Diehl, Thermodynamic Equilibrium as a Symmetry of the Schwinger-Keldysh Action, Phys. Rev. B92, 134307, 2015, [arXiv:1505.00912 [cond-mat.stat-mech]]

  29. [29]

    Caron-Huot and G

    S. Caron-Huot and G. D. Moore, Heavy quark diffusion in QCD and N=4 SYM at next-to-leading order, JHEP02, 081, 2008, [arXiv:0801.2173 [hep-ph]]

  30. [30]

    P. Gao, P. Glorioso and H. Liu, Ghostbusters: Unitarity and Causality of Non-equilibrium Effective Field Theories, JHEP03, 040, 2020, [arXiv:1803.10778 [hep-th]]

  31. [31]

    Mishra, J

    R. Mishra, J. Wang, S. Pappalardi and L. V. Delacr´ etaz, Theory of Out-of-Time-Ordered Transport, 2025, [arXiv:2512.11198 [cond-mat.str-el]]. 53

  32. [32]

    S. R. Coleman, J. Wess and B. Zumino, Structure of phenomenological Lagrangians. 1., Phys.Rev.177, 2239–2247, 1969

  33. [33]

    Callan, Curtis G., S

    J. Callan, Curtis G., S. R. Coleman, J. Wess and B. Zumino, Structure of phenomenological Lagrangians. 2., Phys.Rev.177, 2247–2250, 1969

  34. [34]

    P. C. Martin, E. D. Siggia and H. A. Rose, Statistical Dynamics of Classical Systems, Phys. Rev. A8, 423–437, 1973

  35. [35]

    C. d. Dominicis, Techniques de renormalisation de la th´ eorie des champs et dynamique des ph´ enomenes critiques, 1976

  36. [36]

    Janssen, On a Lagrangean for classical field dynamics and renormalization group calculations of dynamical critical properties, Z

    H.-K. Janssen, On a Lagrangean for classical field dynamics and renormalization group calculations of dynamical critical properties, Z. Phys. B23, 377–380, 1976

  37. [37]

    F. M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam and M. Rangamani, The Fluid Manifesto: Emergent symmetries, hydrodynamics, and black holes, JHEP01, 184, 2016, [arXiv:1510.02494 [hep-th]]

  38. [38]

    Crossley, P

    M. Crossley, P. Glorioso and H. Liu, Effective field theory of dissipative fluids, JHEP09, 095, 2017, [arXiv:1511.03646 [hep-th]]

  39. [39]

    Jensen, R

    K. Jensen, R. Marjieh, N. Pinzani-Fokeeva and A. Yarom, A panoply of Schwinger-Keldysh transport, SciPost Phys.5, 053, 2018, [arXiv:1804.04654 [hep-th]]

  40. [40]

    Ogunnaike, J

    O. Ogunnaike, J. Feldmeier and J. Y. Lee, Unifying Emergent Hydrodynamics and Lindbladian Low-Energy Spectra across Symmetries, Constraints, and Long-Range Interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 220403, 2023, [arXiv:2304.13028 [cond-mat.str-el]]

  41. [41]

    C. O. Akyuz, G. Goon and R. Penco, The Schwinger-Keldysh coset construction, JHEP06, 004, 2024, [arXiv:2306.17232 [hep-th]]

  42. [42]

    Buca and T

    B. Buca and T. Prosen, A note on symmetry reductions of the Lindblad equation: Transport in constrained open spin chains, New J. Phys.14, 073007, 2012, [arXiv:1203.0943 [quant-ph]]

  43. [43]

    Manzano, A short introduction to the lindblad master equation,10, AIP Advances, 2020, [arXiv:1906.04478 [quant-ph]]

    D. Manzano, A short introduction to the lindblad master equation,10, AIP Advances, 2020, [arXiv:1906.04478 [quant-ph]]

  44. [44]

    D. Gu, Z. Wang and Z. Wang, Spontaneous symmetry breaking in open quantum systems: strong, weak, and strong-to-weak, 2024, [arXiv:2406.19381 [quant-ph]]

  45. [45]

    Huang, M

    X. Huang, M. Qi, J.-H. Zhang and A. Lucas, Hydrodynamics as the effective field theory of strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. B111, 125147, 2025, [arXiv:2407.08760 [cond-mat.str-el]]

  46. [46]

    Hauser, K

    J. Hauser, K. Su, H. Ha, J. Lloyd, T. G. Kiely, R. Vasseur, S. Gopalakrishnan, C. Xu and M. P. A. Fisher, Strong-to-Weak Symmetry Breaking in Open Quantum Systems: From Discrete Particles to Continuum Hydrodynamics, 2026, [arXiv:2602.16045 [quant-ph]]. 54

  47. [47]

    L. A. Lessa, R. Ma, J.-H. Zhang, Z. Bi, M. Cheng and C. Wang, Strong-to-Weak Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking in Mixed Quantum States, PRX Quantum6, 010344, 2025, [arXiv:2405.03639 [quant-ph]]

  48. [48]

    Zhang, Y

    C. Zhang, Y. Xu, J.-H. Zhang, C. Xu, Z. Bi and Z.-X. Luo, Strong-to-weak spontaneous breaking of 1-form symmetry and intrinsically mixed topological order, Phys. Rev. B111, 115137, 2025, [arXiv:2409.17530 [quant-ph]]

  49. [49]

    S.-T. Zhou, M. Cheng, T. Rakovszky, C. von Keyserlingk and T. D. Ellison, Finite-Temperature Quantum Topological Order in Three Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 040402, 2025, [arXiv:2503.02928 [cond-mat.str-el]]

  50. [50]

    Firat, A

    E. Firat, A. Gomes, F. Nardi, R. Penco and R. Rattazzi, Schwinger-Keldysh effective theory of charge transport: redundancies and systematicω/T expansion, JHEP05, 079, 2026, [arXiv:2508.18346 [hep-th]]

  51. [51]

    Glorioso, M

    P. Glorioso, M. Crossley and H. Liu, Effective field theory of dissipative fluids (II): classical limit, dynamical KMS symmetry and entropy current, JHEP09, 096, 2017, [arXiv:1701.07817 [hep-th]]

  52. [52]

    Bucca, A

    M. Bucca, A. Jain, M. Mezei and A. Milekhin, All-order fluctuating hydrodynamics of the SYK lattice, 2026, [arXiv:2604.18675 [hep-th]]

  53. [53]

    L. V. Delacretaz and R. Mishra, Nonlinear response in diffusive systems, SciPost Phys.16, 047, 2024, [arXiv:2304.03236 [cond-mat.str-el]]

  54. [54]

    B. J. Alder and T. E. Wainwright, Decay of the Velocity Autocorrelation Function, Phys. Rev. A1, 18–21, 1970

  55. [55]

    Forster, D

    D. Forster, D. R. Nelson and M. J. Stephen, Large-distance and long-time properties of a randomly stirred fluid, Phys. Rev. A16, 732–749, 1977

  56. [56]

    Kovtun and L

    P. Kovtun and L. G. Yaffe, Hydrodynamic fluctuations, long time tails, and supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D68, 025007, 2003, [arXiv:hep-th/0303010]

  57. [57]

    Kovtun, G

    P. Kovtun, G. D. Moore and P. Romatschke, The stickiness of sound: An absolute lower limit on viscosity and the breakdown of second order relativistic hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D84, 025006, 2011, [arXiv:1104.1586 [hep-ph]]

  58. [58]

    Caron-Huot and O

    S. Caron-Huot and O. Saremi, Hydrodynamic Long-Time tails From Anti de Sitter Space, JHEP11, 013, 2010, [arXiv:0909.4525 [hep-th]]

  59. [59]

    A. A. Michailidis, D. A. Abanin and L. V. Delacr´ etaz, Corrections to Diffusion in Interacting Quantum Systems, Phys. Rev. X14, 031020, 2024, [arXiv:2310.10564 [cond-mat.stat-mech]]

  60. [60]

    A. Jain, P. Kovtun, A. Ritz and A. Shukla, Hydrodynamic effective field theory and the analyticity of hydrostatic correlators, JHEP02, 200, 2021, [arXiv:2011.03691 [hep-th]]. 55

  61. [61]

    Chen-Lin, L

    X. Chen-Lin, L. V. Delacr´ etaz and S. A. Hartnoll, Theory of diffusive fluctuations, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 091602, 2019, [arXiv:1811.12540 [hep-th]]

  62. [62]

    L. V. Delacretaz, Heavy Operators and Hydrodynamic Tails, SciPost Phys.9, 034, 2020, [arXiv:2006.01139 [hep-th]]

  63. [63]

    A. Raj, P. Glorioso, S. Gopalakrishnan and V. Oganesyan, Diffusion cascade in a model of interacting random walkers, 2024, [arXiv:2412.05222 [cond-mat.stat-mech]]

  64. [64]

    Winer and B

    M. Winer and B. Swingle, Hydrodynamic Theory of the Connected Spectral form Factor, Phys. Rev. X12, 021009, 2022, [arXiv:2012.01436 [cond-mat.stat-mech]]

  65. [65]

    A. J. Friedman, A. Chan, A. De Luca and J. T. Chalker, Spectral statistics and many-body quantum chaos with conserved charge, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 210603, 2019, [arXiv:1906.07736 [cond-mat.stat-mech]]

  66. [66]

    Rakovszky, F

    T. Rakovszky, F. Pollmann and C. W. von Keyserlingk, Diffusive hydrodynamics of out-of-time-ordered correlators with charge conservation, Phys. Rev. X8, 031058, 2018, [arXiv:1710.09827 [cond-mat.stat-mech]]

  67. [67]

    Khemani, A

    V. Khemani, A. Vishwanath and D. A. Huse, Operator spreading and the emergence of dissipation in unitary dynamics with conservation laws, Phys. Rev. X8, 031057, 2018, [arXiv:1710.09835 [cond-mat.stat-mech]]

  68. [68]

    Rakovszky, F

    T. Rakovszky, F. Pollmann and C. W. von Keyserlingk, Sub-ballistic Growth of R´ enyi Entropies due to Diffusion, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 250602, 2019, [arXiv:1901.10502 [cond-mat.str-el]]

  69. [69]

    Y. Chen, V. Ivo and J. Maldacena, Comments on the double cone wormhole, JHEP04, 124, 2024, [arXiv:2310.11617 [hep-th]]

  70. [70]

    Chaudhuri and R

    S. Chaudhuri and R. Loganayagam, Probing Out-of-Time-Order Correlators, JHEP07, 006, 2019, [arXiv:1807.09731 [hep-th]]

  71. [71]

    Eling, Y

    C. Eling, Y. Neiman and Y. Oz, Holographic Non-Abelian Charged Hydrodynamics from the Dynamics of Null Horizons, JHEP12, 086, 2010, [arXiv:1010.1290 [hep-th]]

  72. [72]

    Glorioso, L

    P. Glorioso, L. V. Delacr´ etaz, X. Chen, R. M. Nandkishore and A. Lucas, Hydrodynamics in lattice models with continuous non-Abelian symmetries, SciPost Phys.10, 015, 2021, [arXiv:2007.13753 [cond-mat.stat-mech]]

  73. [73]

    R. A. Davison, B. Gout´ eraux and S. A. Hartnoll, Incoherent transport in clean quantum critical metals, JHEP10, 112, 2015, [arXiv:1507.07137 [hep-th]]

  74. [74]

    Grozdanov, A

    S. Grozdanov, A. Lucas and N. Poovuttikul, Holography and hydrodynamics with weakly broken symmetries, Phys. Rev. D99, 086012, 2019, [arXiv:1810.10016 [hep-th]]. 56

  75. [75]

    L. V. Delacr´ etaz, B. Gout´ eraux and V. Ziogas, Damping of Pseudo-Goldstone Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 141601, 2022, [arXiv:2111.13459 [hep-th]]

  76. [76]

    J. M. Torres-Rincon and D. Teaney, Kinetics of hydrodynamic pions in chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D106, 056012, 2022, [arXiv:2201.10495 [hep-ph]]

  77. [77]

    Stephanov and Y

    M. Stephanov and Y. Yin, Hydrodynamics with parametric slowing down and fluctuations near the critical point, Phys. Rev. D98, 036006, 2018, [arXiv:1712.10305 [nucl-th]]

  78. [78]

    D. T. Son and M. A. Stephanov, Real time pion propagation in finite temperature QCD, Phys. Rev. D66, 076011, 2002, [arXiv:hep-ph/0204226]

  79. [79]

    Grossi, A

    E. Grossi, A. Soloviev, D. Teaney and F. Yan, Transport and hydrodynamics in the chiral limit, Phys. Rev. D102, 014042, 2020, [arXiv:2005.02885 [hep-th]]

  80. [80]

    Ledwith, H

    P. Ledwith, H. Guo and L. Levitov, Angular Superdiffusion and Directional Memory in Two-Dimensional Electron Fluids, 2017, [arXiv:1708.01915 [cond-mat.mes-hall]]

Showing first 80 references.