pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.02685 · v1 · pith:SNCR2Y4Xnew · submitted 2026-06-01 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA · astro-ph.CO· astro-ph.HE

A Steep-Extinction QSO at z=4.6: JWST Evidence for Abundant Small Dust Grains

Mingyu Li , Zheng Cai , Roberto Maiolino , Fengwu Sun , Xihan Ji , Qiao Duan , Bjorn H. C. Emonts , Xiaohui Fan
show 4 more authors
Ignas Juod\v{z}balis Xiaojing Lin Yixiao Liu Sandro Tacchella
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 13:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.COastro-ph.HE
keywords quasardust extinctionsmall silicate grainshigh redshiftJWST spectroscopyoutflowsearly universe dust2175 Angstrom bump
0
0 comments X

The pith

A quasar at z=4.556 shows an exceptionally steep far-UV extinction curve with no 2175Å bump, indicating dominance of small silicate dust grains.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports JWST spectroscopy of quasar UDS-27023 at redshift 4.556. Quantitative comparison to composite templates reveals a far-UV extinction ratio A1500/AV of about 8 together with the absence of the usual 2175 Angstrom absorption feature. The authors interpret this combination as direct evidence that small silicate grains are the main dust population. They propose that QSO-driven shocks and outflows either shatter larger grains or allow fresh condensation of small silicates inside dense winds. If this picture holds, the object exemplifies a brief evolutionary stage in which active galactic nuclei actively generate and redistribute the small grains needed for rapid dust growth in the early universe.

Core claim

UDS-27023 at z=4.556 displays an exceptionally steep far-UV extinction curve (A1500/AV ≈ 8) but lacks the 2175 Angstrom bump. This indicates a dominance of small silicate dust grains. The authors interpret this phenomenology as evidence for active small-grain production and processing in the QSO environment, with mechanical shattering of pre-existing large grains by QSO-driven shocks and outflows providing one pathway and in-situ condensation of silicate grains inside dense QSO-driven winds offering another.

What carries the argument

The shape of the far-UV extinction curve, defined by its steep slope (A1500/AV ≈ 8) and missing 2175Å bump, used to diagnose a dust population dominated by small silicate grains.

If this is right

  • Steep-extinction QSOs represent a short-lived phase in which luminous AGN generate, process, and redistribute small grains.
  • This activity can facilitate rapid interstellar-medium grain growth by increasing available surface area for accretion.
  • Small grains produced in this way can enrich the circumgalactic medium around the host galaxy.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If small-grain production is common in luminous high-redshift AGN, it supplies a missing channel that helps close the dust-budget gap in the first billion years.
  • Targeted JWST surveys for additional objects with the same extinction signature could measure how frequently this phase occurs.
  • The same grain-processing physics may operate in starburst-driven outflows, offering a testable link between AGN and star-formation feedback.

Load-bearing premise

The spectral comparison to QSO composite templates isolates the extinction curve without significant contamination from emission-line variability, host-galaxy light, or geometric effects in the outflow.

What would settle it

Re-reduction of the NIRSpec spectrum showing that the apparent steep UV slope and missing bump can be reproduced by adding variable broad emission lines or host-galaxy continuum without invoking any change in dust properties.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.02685 by Bjorn H. C. Emonts, Fengwu Sun, Ignas Juod\v{z}balis, Mingyu Li, Qiao Duan, Roberto Maiolino, Sandro Tacchella, Xiaohui Fan, Xiaojing Lin, Xihan Ji, Yixiao Liu, Zheng Cai.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: JWST imaging and spectroscopy of UDS-27023. Top: 2 ′′ × 2 ′′ JWST/NIRCam cutouts in the available filters and an RGB composite (left), showing that the source is compact and dominated by a point source in all bands. Bottom: JWST/NIRSpec PRISM spectrum (black) overlaid with the NIRCam photometry (blue hexagons), illustrating the bright con￾tinuum and strong broad emission lines characteristic of a Type I QS… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Rest-frame SED and inferred line-of-sight extinction curve of UDS-27023. Left: Rest-frame UV–optical–NIR spectrum of UDS-27023 (red) compared to an intrinsic blue-QSO composite (blue). The orange curve shows the spectrum corrected using the best-fit extinction curve, illustrating that the dereddened continuum approaches the intrinsic QSO template over the wavelength range. Right: Extinction curve reconstru… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Physical interpretation and context for the steep extinction toward UDS-27023. Left: Location of SEQ (red symbol) in the plane of dust-law steepness, S ≡ A1500/AV, versus AV. The grey-scale background shows the distribution of dust attenuation slopes inferred for SDSS galaxies from the GSWLC survey (S. Salim et al. 2016, 2018), and the blue points show the z ≈ 2–10 JWST galaxy attenuation constraints from … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Schematic illustration of the origin, distribution, and fate of small dust grains in the steep-extinction QSO. Left (Origin): In the early Universe, dust is predominantly injected as large grains by core-collapse supernovae (CCSNe), with minor contributions from AGB stars. Small grains may then be produced through two rapid channels in the QSO environment. In the first pathway, violent feedback drives grai… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Photometric selection biases induced by SEQ-like extinction. Left: A set of illustrative JWST/NIRCam color–color diagrams demonstrating that UDS-27023 (red symbol) lies outside common loci for AGN and QSOs in multiple color spaces. Colored tracks show synthetic colors for an intrinsic QSO composite (J. Selsing et al. 2016), representative LRD-like colors (Z. Zhang et al. 2025), and the SEQ extinction model… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Photometric redshift and SED modeling on the JWST photometry for UDS-27023 using the Prospector code, still revealing a quiescent/post-starburst galaxy at zphot ≈ 2.6. Left: Observed spectrum (thin red line) and photometry (filled red circles with error bars) compared with the best-fit Prospector model spectrum (thick black line) and synthetic photometry (open cyan squares). Fit residuals χ are shown in th… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The rapid accumulation of massive dust reservoirs in the early Universe remains a major challenge in astrophysics. While core-collapse supernovae can inject large dust grains ($a \gtrsim 0.1\,\mu{\rm m}$) on short timescales, explaining the total dust budgets in the early Universe likely requires efficient grain growth in the interstellar medium (ISM). Such growth depends critically on an abundant population of small grains, which maximize the surface area available for accretion and may be generated by rapid dust-processing or dust-formation channels. Here, we report the discovery of a QSO UDS-27023 at $z=4.556\pm0.003$, identified using JWST/NIRSpec spectroscopy. By quantitatively comparing the spectra to QSO composite templates, we find that UDS-27023 displays an exceptionally steep far-UV extinction curve ($A_{1500}/A_V \approx 8$) but notably lacks the 2175 Angstrom bump, indicating a dominance of small silicate dust grains. We interpret this phenomenology as evidence for active small-grain production and processing in the QSO environment. Mechanical shattering of pre-existing large grains by QSO-driven shocks and outflows provides one natural pathway, while in-situ condensation of silicate grains inside dense QSO-driven winds may offer an additional route. Such a population of steep-extinction QSOs (SEQs) may therefore reveal a short-lived phase in which luminous AGN generate, process, and redistribute small grains, potentially facilitating rapid ISM grain growth and enriching the circumgalactic medium.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the discovery of quasar UDS-27023 at z=4.556 using JWST/NIRSpec spectroscopy. Quantitative comparison of its spectrum to QSO composite templates yields an exceptionally steep far-UV extinction curve (A_1500/A_V ≈ 8) lacking the 2175 Å bump, which the authors interpret as evidence for a dominance of small silicate grains produced or processed in the QSO environment through shocks or in-situ condensation in outflows.

Significance. If the extinction curve derivation holds, the result would supply observational support for efficient small-grain production in high-redshift AGN, offering a pathway to explain rapid dust budgets in the early Universe via mechanical shattering or wind condensation. This could motivate searches for a population of steep-extinction QSOs as a short-lived evolutionary phase.

major comments (1)
  1. [Spectral comparison and extinction derivation (analysis section)] The central claim of A_1500/A_V ≈ 8 and absence of the 2175 Å bump rests on template matching whose robustness is not demonstrated. No systematic tests are reported that vary broad-line equivalent widths, add a host-galaxy continuum component at rest-frame <2000 Å, or account for wavelength-dependent covering fractions before attributing residuals to dust extinction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback on the robustness of our spectral analysis. We agree that additional systematic tests will strengthen the central claim and will incorporate them in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim of A_1500/A_V ≈ 8 and absence of the 2175 Å bump rests on template matching whose robustness is not demonstrated. No systematic tests are reported that vary broad-line equivalent widths, add a host-galaxy continuum component at rest-frame <2000 Å, or account for wavelength-dependent covering fractions before attributing residuals to dust extinction.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current manuscript does not report explicit systematic tests of the template matching procedure. The quantitative comparison was performed against standard high-redshift QSO composites, with residuals clearly indicating a steep far-UV rise and no 2175 Å feature. However, we agree that varying broad-line equivalent widths (within the range observed for z~4-5 QSOs), including a possible host-galaxy continuum contribution below 2000 Å, and exploring wavelength-dependent covering fractions would better demonstrate that the derived A_1500/A_V ≈8 is robust. In the revised manuscript we will add these tests, showing that the extinction parameters remain stable under reasonable variations of these components. This will directly address the concern while preserving the interpretation of small-grain dominance. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: extinction curve obtained via external template comparison

full rationale

The central result (A_1500/A_V ≈ 8, absence of 2175 Å bump) is obtained by quantitative comparison of the observed NIRSpec spectrum against pre-existing QSO composite templates. This is a direct observational measurement, not a fitted functional form, self-defined quantity, or prediction derived from the same data. No equations, ansatzes, or self-citations are invoked that would make the reported ratio equivalent to its inputs by construction. The subsequent physical interpretation (small-grain dominance) follows from standard dust-physics relations external to the paper. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new free parameters, axioms beyond standard dust-extinction assumptions, or invented entities; the interpretation rests on the domain assumption that template residuals map directly to grain-size distribution.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard QSO composite templates and Milky-Way-type extinction laws remain applicable at z≈4.6 without major modifications from metallicity or radiation-field effects.
    Invoked when the observed spectrum is compared to templates to extract the extinction curve.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5880 in / 1266 out tokens · 24742 ms · 2026-06-28T13:48:43.148407+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 81 canonical work pages · 6 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Algera, H. S. B., Rowland, L., Stefanon, M., et al. 2026, MNRAS, 545, staf1897, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1897

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1897 2026

  2. [2]

    S., Takeuchi, T

    Asano, R. S., Takeuchi, T. T., Hirashita, H., & Nozawa, T. 2013, MNRAS, 432, 637, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt506 B´ ethermin, M., Fudamoto, Y., Ginolfi, M., et al. 2020, A&A, 643, A2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202037649

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt506 2013

  3. [3]

    2023,, 0.6.17 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8319596

    Brammer, G. 2023,, 0.6.17 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8319596

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.8319596 2023

  4. [4]

    M., Sobral, D., Smail, I., et al

    Bruce, V. A., Dunlop, J. S., Cirasuolo, M., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 1666, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22087.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22087.x 2012

  5. [5]

    C., et al.\ 2000, , 533, 682, doi:10.1086/308692

    Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 682, doi: 10.1086/308692

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/308692 2000

  6. [6]

    A., Clayton, G

    Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 245, doi: 10.1086/167900

    work page doi:10.1086/167900 1989

  7. [7]

    C., Walker, S., McLure, R

    Carnall, A. C., Walker, S., McLure, R. J., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 496, 695, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1535

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1535 2020

  8. [8]

    2025, ApJ, 988, 204, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ade307

    Chen, J., Jiang, L., Sun, S., Zhang, Z., & Sun, M. 2025, ApJ, 988, 204, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ade307

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade307 2025

  9. [9]

    2018, NatAs, 2, 176, doi: 10.1038/s41550-018-0406-3

    Cicone, C., Brusa, M., Ramos Almeida, C., et al. 2018, NatAs, 2, 176, doi: 10.1038/s41550-018-0406-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-018-0406-3 2018

  10. [10]

    J., Spitler, L

    Cowley, M. J., Spitler, L. R., Tran, K.-V. H., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 457, 629, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2992 12M. Li et al. 2 3 4 5 Redshift z 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5P(z) zphot = 2.59+0.05 −0.08 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 Lookback time [Myr] 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350SFR [M ⊙ yr−1] SFR 50th SFR 16-84th 10000 20000 30000 40000 500000 1 2 3 4 5 6fλ [10−19 erg s−1 cm−2 Å−1] P...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2992 2016

  11. [11]

    Draine, B. T. 2003, ARA&A, 41, 241, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.41.011802.094840

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.41.011802.094840 2003

  12. [12]

    T., Lee, H

    Draine, B. T., & Lee, H. M. 1984, ApJ, 285, 89, doi: 10.1086/162480

    work page doi:10.1086/162480 1984

  13. [13]

    T., & Salpeter, E

    Draine, B. T., & Salpeter, E. E. 1979, ApJ, 231, 77, doi: 10.1086/157165

    work page doi:10.1086/157165 1979

  14. [14]

    D., et al

    Duan, Q., Tacchella, S., Johnson, B. D., et al. 2026, arXiv, arXiv:2605.21599. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21599

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  15. [15]

    2020, A&A, 636, A73, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936817

    Duras, F., Bongiorno, A., Ricci, F., et al. 2020, A&A, 636, A73, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936817

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936817 2020

  16. [16]

    2002, ApJL, 567, L107, doi: 10.1086/340006

    Elvis, M., Marengo, M., & Karovska, M. 2002, ApJL, 567, L107, doi: 10.1086/340006

    work page doi:10.1086/340006 2002

  17. [17]

    Fisher, R., Bowler, R. A. A., Stefanon, M., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 539, 109, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf485

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf485 2025

  18. [18]

    2008, ApJS, 176, 1, doi: 10.1086/527321

    Furusawa, H., Kosugi, G., Akiyama, M., et al. 2008, ApJS, 176, 1, doi: 10.1086/527321

    work page doi:10.1086/527321 2008

  19. [19]

    2013, ApJS, 206, 10, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/206/2/10

    Galametz, A., Grazian, A., Fontana, A., et al. 2013, ApJS, 206, 10, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/206/2/10

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/206/2/10 2013

  20. [20]

    C., & Hjorth, J

    Gall, C., Andersen, A. C., & Hjorth, J. 2011, A&A, 528, A13, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015286

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015286 2011

  21. [21]

    C., Brandt, W

    Gallagher, S. C., Brandt, W. N., Chartas, G., et al. 2006, ApJ, 644, 709, doi: 10.1086/503762

    work page doi:10.1086/503762 2006

  22. [22]

    2010, A&A, 523, A85, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014721

    Gallerani, S., Maiolino, R., Juarez, Y., et al. 2010, A&A, 523, A85, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014721

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014721 2010

  23. [23]

    D., Clayton, G

    Gordon, K. D., Clayton, G. C., Misselt, K. A., Landolt, A. U., & Wolff, M. J. 2003, ApJ, 594, 279, doi: 10.1086/376774

    work page doi:10.1086/376774 2003

  24. [24]

    2001, ApJ, 558, 109, doi: 10.1086/322311

    Elvis, M. 2001, ApJ, 558, 109, doi: 10.1086/322311

    work page doi:10.1086/322311 2001

  25. [25]

    E., & Ho, L

    Greene, J. E., & Ho, L. C. 2005, ApJ, 630, 122, doi: 10.1086/431897

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/431897 2005

  26. [26]

    A., Gu, M., et al

    Guo, H., Malkan, M. A., Gu, M., et al. 2016, ApJ, 826, 186, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/186

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/826/2/186 2016

  27. [27]

    B., Anderson, S

    Hall, P. B., Anderson, S. F., Strauss, M. A., et al. 2002, ApJS, 141, 267, doi: 10.1086/340546

    work page doi:10.1086/340546 2002

  28. [28]

    E., Watson, D., Brammer, G., et al

    Heintz, K. E., Watson, D., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, Sci, 384, 890, doi: 10.1126/science.adj0343

    work page doi:10.1126/science.adj0343 2024

  29. [29]

    L., Jarvis, M

    Heywood, I., Hale, C. L., Jarvis, M. J., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 496, 3469, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1770

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1770 2020

  30. [30]

    , keywords =

    Hirashita, H. 2010, MNRAS, 407, L49, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2010.00902.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2010.00902.x 2010

  31. [31]

    M., Sobral, D., Smail, I., et al

    Hirashita, H. 2012, MNRAS, 422, 1263, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20702.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20702.x 2012

  32. [32]

    2013, EP&S, 65, 1083, doi: 10.5047/eps.2013.03.008 Steep-Extinction QSO13

    Hirashita, H., & Kobayashi, H. 2013, EP&S, 65, 1083, doi: 10.5047/eps.2013.03.008 Steep-Extinction QSO13

    work page doi:10.5047/eps.2013.03.008 2013

  33. [33]

    2021, MNRAS, 505, 1794, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1416

    Hirashita, H., & Lan, T.-W. 2021, MNRAS, 505, 1794, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1416

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1416 2021

  34. [34]

    2010, MNRAS, 401, 2343, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15859.x

    Hirashita, H., & Yan, H. 2009, MNRAS, 394, 1061, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14405.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14405.x 2009

  35. [35]

    J., Caputi, K

    Ikarashi, S., Ivison, R. J., Caputi, K. I., et al. 2015, ApJ, 810, 133, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/810/2/133

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/810/2/133 2015

  36. [36]

    Inami, H., Algera, H. S. B., Schouws, S., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 515, 3126, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1779

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1779 2022

  37. [37]

    2013, AJ, 145, 157, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/145/6/157

    Jiang, P., Zhou, H., Ji, T., et al. 2013, AJ, 145, 157, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/145/6/157

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/145/6/157 2013

  38. [38]

    D., Leja, J., Conroy, C., & Speagle, J

    Johnson, B. D., Leja, J., Conroy, C., & Speagle, J. S. 2021, ApJS, 254, 22, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abef67

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abef67 2021

  39. [39]

    P., Tielens, A

    Jones, A. P., Tielens, A. G. G. M., & Hollenbach, D. J. 1996, ApJ, 469, 740, doi: 10.1086/177823

    work page doi:10.1086/177823 1996

  40. [40]

    D., Hasinger, G., Brightman, M., et al

    Kocevski, D. D., Hasinger, G., Brightman, M., et al. 2018, ApJS, 236, 48, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aab9b4

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aab9b4 2018

  41. [41]

    H., Newman, J

    Kodra, D., Andrews, B. H., Newman, J. A., et al. 2023, ApJ, 942, 36, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9f12

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac9f12 2023

  42. [42]

    Krogager, J.-K., Fynbo, J. P. U., Heintz, K. E., et al. 2016, ApJ, 832, 49, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/832/1/49

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/832/1/49 2016

  43. [43]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Kuo, T.-M., & Hirashita, H. 2012, MNRAS, 424, L34, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2012.01282.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2012.01282.x 2012

  44. [44]

    S., Reeves, J., et al

    Laha, S., Reynolds, C. S., Reeves, J., et al. 2021, NatAs, 5, 13, doi: 10.1038/s41550-020-01255-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-020-01255-2 2021

  45. [45]

    Laor, A., & Draine, B. T. 1993, ApJ, 402, 441, doi: 10.1086/172149

    work page doi:10.1086/172149 1993

  46. [46]

    J., Almaini, O., Edge, A

    Lawrence, A., Warren, S. J., Almaini, O., et al. 2007, MNRAS, 379, 1599, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12040.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12040.x 2007

  47. [47]

    Speagle, J. S. 2019, ApJ, 876, 3, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab133c Le´ sniewska, A., & Micha lowski, M. J. 2019, A&A, 624, L13, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935149

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab133c 2019

  48. [48]

    Li, A., & Greenberg, J. M. 2003, in Solid State Astrochemistry, ed. V. Pirronello, J. Krelowski, & G. Manic` o, Vol. 120, 37–84, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0204392

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0204392 2003

  49. [49]

    L., Kann, D

    Li, A., Liang, S. L., Kann, D. A., et al. 2008, ApJ, 685, 1046, doi: 10.1086/591049

    work page doi:10.1086/591049 2008

  50. [50]

    2004, Natur, 431, 533, doi: 10.1038/nature02930

    Maiolino, R., Schneider, R., Oliva, E., et al. 2004, Natur, 431, 533, doi: 10.1038/nature02930

    work page doi:10.1038/nature02930 2004

  51. [51]

    Nature Astronomy , keywords =

    Markov, V., Gallerani, S., Ferrara, A., et al. 2025, NatAs, 9, 458, doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02426-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-024-02426-1 2025

  52. [52]

    V., de Graaff, A., Franx, M., et al

    Maseda, M. V., de Graaff, A., Franx, M., et al. 2024, A&A, 689, A73, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449914

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449914 2024

  53. [53]

    S., Rumpl, W., & Nordsieck, K

    Mathis, J. S., Rumpl, W., & Nordsieck, K. H. 1977, ApJ, 217, 425, doi: 10.1086/155591

    work page doi:10.1086/155591 1977

  54. [54]

    2016, A&A, 587, A83, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527277

    Pertermann, F. 2016, A&A, 587, A83, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527277

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527277 2016

  55. [55]

    2011, ApJ, 737, 46, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/737/1/46

    Shankar, F. 2011, ApJ, 737, 46, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/737/1/46

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/737/1/46 2011

  56. [56]

    , keywords =

    Oke, J. B., & Gunn, J. E. 1983, ApJ, 266, 713, doi: 10.1086/160817

    work page doi:10.1086/160817 1983

  57. [57]

    2019, ApJ, 871, 109, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf7a4

    Patil, P., Nyland, K., Lacy, M., et al. 2019, ApJ, 871, 109, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf7a4

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf7a4 2019

  58. [58]

    A., Bradford, C

    Riechers, D. A., Bradford, C. M., Clements, D. L., et al. 2013, Natur, 496, 329, doi: 10.1038/nature12050

    work page doi:10.1038/nature12050 2013

  59. [59]

    E., Johnson, B

    Robertson, B. E., Johnson, B. D., Tacchella, S., et al. 2026, arXiv, arXiv:2601.15956, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.15956

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.15956 2026

  60. [60]

    A., Hall, P

    Rogerson, J. A., Hall, P. B., Snedden, S. A., Brotherton, M. S., & Anderson, S. F. 2011, NewA, 16, 128, doi: 10.1016/j.newast.2010.07.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.newast.2010.07.002 2011

  61. [61]

    L., Dunne, L., et al

    Rowlands, K., Gomez, H. L., Dunne, L., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 441, 1040, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu605

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu605 2014

  62. [62]

    Salim, S., Boquien, M., & Lee, J. C. 2018, ApJ, 859, 11, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aabf3c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aabf3c 2018

  63. [63]

    C., Janowiecki, S., et al

    Salim, S., Lee, J. C., Janowiecki, S., et al. 2016, ApJS, 227, 2, doi: 10.3847/0067-0049/227/1/2

    work page doi:10.3847/0067-0049/227/1/2 2016

  64. [64]

    2019, ApJ, 885, 126, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab46a9

    Sarangi, A., Dwek, E., & Kazanas, D. 2019, ApJ, 885, 126, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab46a9

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab46a9 2019

  65. [65]

    2024, A&ARv, 32, 2, doi: 10.1007/s00159-024-00151-2

    Schneider, R., & Maiolino, R. 2024, A&ARv, 32, 2, doi: 10.1007/s00159-024-00151-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-024-00151-2 2024

  66. [66]

    D.Sijacki,V.Springel,T.DiMatteo,andL.Hernquist.MNRAS,380(3):877–900,Sept.2007

    Scoville, N., Sheth, K., Aussel, H., et al. 2016, ApJ, 820, 83, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/820/2/83

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/820/2/83 2016

  67. [67]

    Selsing, J., Fynbo, J. P. U., Christensen, L., & Krogager, J.-K. 2016, A&A, 585, A87, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527096

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527096 2016

  68. [68]

    P., Rodr´ ıguez Montero, F., et al

    Shivaei, I., Naidu, R. P., Rodr´ ıguez Montero, F., et al. 2025, arXiv, arXiv:2509.01795, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.01795

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.01795 2025

  69. [69]

    J., D’Eugenio, F., et al

    Sun, F., Eisenstein, D. J., D’Eugenio, F., et al. 2026, arXiv, arXiv:2601.15961, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.15961

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.15961 2026

  70. [70]

    L., Bagley, M., et al

    Tacchella, S., Finkelstein, S. L., Bagley, M., et al. 2022, ApJ, 927, 170, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4cad

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac4cad 2022

  71. [71]

    2019, ApJ, 874, 27, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0374

    Tamura, Y., Mawatari, K., Hashimoto, T., et al. 2019, ApJ, 874, 27, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0374

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab0374 2019

  72. [72]

    J., Hewett, P

    Temple, M. J., Hewett, P. C., & Banerji, M. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 737, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2586

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2586 2021

  73. [73]

    2001, MNRAS, 322, 231, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x

    Todini, P., & Ferrara, A. 2001, MNRAS, 325, 726, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04486.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04486.x 2001

  74. [74]

    Valiante, R., Schneider, R., Bianchi, S., & Andersen, A. C. 2009, MNRAS, 397, 1661, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15076.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15076.x 2009

  75. [75]

    E., et al

    Valiante, R., Schneider, R., Salvadori, S., & Bianchi, S. 2011, MNRAS, 416, 1916, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19168.x 14M. Li et al. V´ eron-Cetty, M.-P., Joly, M., & V´ eron, P. 2004, A&A, 417, 515, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20035714

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19168.x 2011

  76. [76]

    K., et al

    Watson, D., Christensen, L., Knudsen, K. K., et al. 2015, Natur, 519, 327, doi: 10.1038/nature14164

    work page doi:10.1038/nature14164 2015

  77. [77]

    C., & Draine, B

    Weingartner, J. C., & Draine, B. T. 2001, ApJ, 548, 296, doi: 10.1086/318651

    work page doi:10.1086/318651 2001

  78. [78]

    2023, Natur, 621, 267, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06413-w

    Witstok, J., Shivaei, I., Smit, R., et al. 2023, Natur, 621, 267, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06413-w

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06413-w 2023

  79. [79]

    2015, A&A, 584, A100, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526570

    Zafar, T., Møller, P., Watson, D., et al. 2015, A&A, 584, A100, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526570

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526570 2015

  80. [80]

    2022, A&A, 663, A63, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142476

    Zhang, S., Ge, J., Ji, T., et al. 2022, A&A, 663, A63, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142476

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142476 2022

Showing first 80 references.