pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.02714 · v1 · pith:ERS5BQADnew · submitted 2026-06-01 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· nucl-th

Projected Energy Correlators: Two-Loop Jet Functions and NNLL Resummation

Kyle Lee , Yibei Li , Zhen Xu , Xiaoyuan Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 13:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exnucl-th
keywords energy correlatorsjet functionsNNLL resummationcollinear factorizationQCDnonperturbative correctionsalpha_s extraction
0
0 comments X

The pith

Two-loop jet functions enable NNLL resummation of projected N-point energy correlators up to N=6.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes NNLL collinear resummation for projected N-point energy correlators up to N=6 by computing the required two-loop jet functions semi-analytically. This is done for both electron-positron annihilation and Higgs decay to gluons, with matching to NLO fixed-order results and inclusion of leading non-perturbative corrections via universal soft matrix elements. A sympathetic reader would care as this brings higher-point observables under quantitative perturbative control, potentially enabling alpha_s extractions with different systematics from lower-point ones.

Core claim

The key new ingredient is the two-loop jet function for N=4,5,6 computed using Integration-by-Parts and differential equations, which permits the NNLL resummation of projected N-point energy correlators up to N=6 matched to fixed-order NLO predictions, including leading non-perturbative corrections described by two universal soft matrix elements.

What carries the argument

Two-loop jet function for N=4,5,6 computed semi-analytically via Integration-by-Parts and differential equations.

If this is right

  • The matched NNLL distributions for ENCs up to N=6 can be compared with parton-shower simulations.
  • Sensitivity of the spectra and their ratios to alpha_s and the soft matrix elements can be analyzed.
  • Higher-point projected energy correlators achieve quantitative control at NNLL accuracy.
  • This opens the possibility for future alpha_s extractions with complementary systematics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The anomalous dimensions for (N-1)-point correlators governing the evolution of the soft matrix elements could be used to relate corrections across different N.
  • Ratios of higher N correlators to the two-point one might reduce experimental and theoretical uncertainties in measurements.
  • Applying similar methods to other processes or observables could broaden the use of energy correlators in QCD studies.

Load-bearing premise

The leading non-perturbative corrections are described by two universal soft matrix elements of order Lambda_QCD whose evolution is governed by anomalous dimensions for (N-1)-point correlators.

What would settle it

A direct computation of the jet function at three loops or a comparison with experimental data showing significant deviation from the NNLL prediction after accounting for the included power corrections would falsify the claimed accuracy.

read the original abstract

We present the next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic (NNLL) collinear resummation of projected $N$-point energy correlators (ENCs) up to $N=6$, matched to fixed-order predictions at NLO, in both electron-positron annihilation and Higgs decay to gluons. The key new ingredient is the two-loop jet function for $N=4,5,6$, which we compute semi-analytically using Integration-by-Parts and differential equations. We further include the leading non-perturbative corrections for ENCs, described by two universal soft matrix elements $\overline{\Omega}_{1q},\overline{\Omega}_{1g}$ of order $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}$, whose evolution is governed by anomalous dimensions for $(N-1)$-point correlators. The matched distributions are compared with parton-shower simulations from Pythia8 and Herwig7, and we study the sensitivity of both the absolute spectra and their ratios to the two-point energy correlator under variations of $\alpha_s$ and $\overline{\Omega}_{1q,1g}$. Our results show that higher-point projected energy correlators are now under quantitative control at NNLL accuracy, opening the door to future $\alpha_s$ extractions with complementary systematics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper presents NNLL collinear resummation of projected N-point energy correlators (ENCs) up to N=6 in e+e- annihilation and Higgs decay to gluons, matched to NLO fixed order. The central technical advance is the semi-analytic computation of the two-loop jet functions for N=4,5,6 via integration-by-parts reduction and differential equations. Leading non-perturbative power corrections are modeled by two universal soft matrix elements Ω̅1q and Ω̅1g whose evolution follows (N-1)-point anomalous dimensions. Results are compared to Pythia8 and Herwig7 parton showers, with studies of sensitivity to αs and the soft parameters in both absolute spectra and ratios to the two-point correlator.

Significance. If the two-loop jet-function results hold, the work brings projected ENCs under quantitative NNLL control, providing a new set of observables for αs extractions whose systematics are complementary to event shapes. The explicit IBP+DE computation of the N=4,5,6 jet functions and the consistent matching plus power-correction framework constitute a clear technical contribution to the precision QCD literature.

minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract and introduction would benefit from a brief statement of the kinematic cuts or fiducial phase-space definitions used for the N-point correlators when comparing to parton showers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript, recognition of the technical advances in the two-loop jet functions, and recommendation to accept. There are no major comments to address.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper computes two-loop jet functions for N=4,5,6 directly via Integration-by-Parts reduction and differential equations, then performs standard NNLL collinear resummation matched to NLO fixed order. Non-perturbative power corrections are introduced explicitly as an assumption using two universal soft matrix elements whose evolution follows from known anomalous dimensions; these are not derived from or fitted to the perturbative results within the paper. No quoted equation or step reduces the claimed predictions to inputs by construction, and no load-bearing self-citation chain is exhibited. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained and employs standard field methods without internal reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard perturbative QCD factorization assumptions plus two universal non-perturbative matrix elements whose values and evolution are taken as inputs; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • Ω̅1q
    Universal soft matrix element for quarks of order ΛQCD used to parametrize leading non-perturbative corrections.
  • Ω̅1g
    Universal soft matrix element for gluons of order ΛQCD used to parametrize leading non-perturbative corrections.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Collinear factorization and all-order resummation in perturbative QCD
    Invoked to justify the NNLL resummation of the projected correlators.
  • domain assumption Existence and universality of the two soft matrix elements governing power corrections
    Invoked to include leading non-perturbative effects via evolution with (N-1)-point anomalous dimensions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5766 in / 1444 out tokens · 37342 ms · 2026-06-28T13:25:38.081365+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

104 extracted references · 45 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    G. F. Sterman,Jet Structure in e+ e- Annihilation with Massless Hadrons,ILL-TH-75-32 (1975)

    1975

  2. [2]

    N. A. Sveshnikov and F. V. Tkachov,Jets and quantum field theory,Phys. Lett. B382 (1996) 403–408, [hep-ph/9512370]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  3. [3]

    F. V. Tkachov,Measuring multi - jet structure of hadronic energy flow or What is a jet?, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A12(1997) 5411–5529, [hep-ph/9601308]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  4. [4]

    G. P. Korchemsky and G. F. Sterman,Power corrections to event shapes and factorization, Nucl. Phys. B555(1999) 335–351, [hep-ph/9902341]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  5. [5]

    D. M. Hofman and J. Maldacena,Conformal collider physics: Energy and charge correlations,JHEP05(2008) 012, [arXiv:0803.1467]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  6. [6]

    Kologlu, P

    M. Kologlu, P. Kravchuk, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Zhiboedov,The light-ray OPE and conformal colliders,JHEP01(2021) 128, [arXiv:1905.01311]. – 56 –

    arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    Moult and H

    I. Moult and H. X. Zhu,Energy Correlators: A Journey From Theory to Experiment, arXiv:2506.09119

    arXiv

  8. [8]

    C. L. Basham, L. S. Brown, S. D. Ellis, and S. T. Love,Energy Correlations in electron - Positron Annihilation: Testing QCD,Phys. Rev. Lett.41(1978) 1585

    1978

  9. [9]

    C. L. Basham, L. S. Brown, S. D. Ellis, and S. T. Love,Energy Correlations in electron-Positron Annihilation in Quantum Chromodynamics: Asymptotically Free Perturbation Theory,Phys. Rev. D19(1979) 2018

    1979

  10. [10]

    C. L. Basham, L. S. Brown, S. D. Ellis, and S. T. Love,Energy Correlations in Perturbative Quantum Chromodynamics: A Conjecture for All Orders,Phys. Lett. B85(1979) 297–299

    1979

  11. [11]

    C. L. Basham, L. S. Brown, S. D. Ellis, and S. T. Love,Electron - Positron Annihilation Energy Pattern in Quantum Chromodynamics: Asymptotically Free Perturbation Theory, Phys. Rev. D17(1978) 2298

    1978

  12. [12]

    A. V. Belitsky, S. Hohenegger, G. P. Korchemsky, E. Sokatchev, and A. Zhiboedov, Energy-Energy Correlations in N=4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett. 112(2014), no. 7 071601, [arXiv:1311.6800]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  13. [13]

    J. M. Henn, E. Sokatchev, K. Yan, and A. Zhiboedov,Energy-energy correlation inN=4 super Yang-Mills theory at next-to-next-to-leading order,Phys. Rev. D100(2019), no. 3 036010, [arXiv:1903.05314]

    arXiv 2019

  14. [14]

    L. J. Dixon, M.-X. Luo, V. Shtabovenko, T.-Z. Yang, and H. X. Zhu,Analytical Computation of Energy-Energy Correlation at Next-to-Leading Order in QCD,Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018), no. 10 102001, [arXiv:1801.03219]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  15. [15]

    M.-X. Luo, V. Shtabovenko, T.-Z. Yang, and H. X. Zhu,Analytic Next-To-Leading Order Calculation of Energy-Energy Correlation in Gluon-Initiated Higgs Decays,JHEP06(2019) 037, [arXiv:1903.07277]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  16. [16]

    J. Gao, V. Shtabovenko, and T.-Z. Yang,Energy-energy correlation in hadronic Higgs decays: analytic results and phenomenology at NLO,JHEP02(2021) 210, [arXiv:2012.14188]. [17]ALEPHCollaboration, D. Decamp et al.,Measurement of alpha-s from the structure of particle clusters produced in hadronic Z decays,Phys. Lett. B257(1991) 479–491. [18]DELPHICollaborat...

    arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    Bossi, A

    H. Bossi, A. Baty, Y. Chen, Y.-C. Chen, G.-M. Innocenti, M. Maggi, C. McGinn, and Y.-J. Lee,Measurement of the energy-energy correlator in the back-to-back limit using the archived ALEPH e+e- data at 91.2 GeV,PoSLHCP2024(2025) 228, [arXiv:2501.01968]

    arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Bossi, Y.-C

    H. Bossi, Y.-C. Chen, Y. Chen, J. Zhang, G. M. Innocenti, A. Badea, A. Baty, M. Maggi, C. McGinn, and Y.-J. Lee,Analysis note: measurement of energy-energy correlator ine+e− collisions at91GeV with archived ALEPH data,arXiv:2505.11828. [21]Electron-Positron AllianceCollaboration, H. Bossi et al.,Energy Correlators from Partons to Hadrons: Unveiling the Dy...

    arXiv

  19. [19]

    Zhang, T.-A

    J. Zhang, T.-A. Sheng, Y.-C. Chen, H. Bossi, A. Badea, A. Baty, C. McGinn, Y.-J. Lee, and Y. Chen,Analysis note: measurement of thrust and track energy-energy correlator in e+e- collisions at 91.2 GeV with DELPHI open data,arXiv:2510.18762. – 57 –

    arXiv

  20. [20]

    L. J. Dixon, I. Moult, and H. X. Zhu,Collinear limit of the energy-energy correlator,Phys. Rev. D100(2019), no. 1 014009, [arXiv:1905.01310]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  21. [21]

    G. P. Korchemsky,Energy correlations in the end-point region,JHEP01(2020) 008, [arXiv:1905.01444]

    arXiv 2020

  22. [22]

    Yan and X

    K. Yan and X. Zhang,Three-Point Energy Correlator in N=4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022), no. 2 021602, [arXiv:2203.04349]

    arXiv 2022

  23. [23]

    Chen, M.-X

    H. Chen, M.-X. Luo, I. Moult, T.-Z. Yang, X. Zhang, and H. X. Zhu,Three point energy correlators in the collinear limit: symmetries, dualities and analytic results,JHEP08 (2020) 028, [arXiv:1912.11050]

    arXiv 2020

  24. [24]

    Yang and X

    T.-Z. Yang and X. Zhang,Analytic Computation of three-point energy correlator in QCD, JHEP09(2022) 006, [arXiv:2208.01051]

    arXiv 2022

  25. [25]

    Yang and X

    T.-Z. Yang and X. Zhang,Three-point energy correlators in hadronic Higgs boson decays, Phys. Rev. D109(2024), no. 11 114036, [arXiv:2402.05174]

    arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Chicherin, I

    D. Chicherin, I. Moult, E. Sokatchev, K. Yan, and Y. Zhu,Collinear limit of the four-point energy correlator in N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory,Phys. Rev. D110(2024), no. 9 L091901, [arXiv:2401.06463]

    arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    S. He, X. Jiang, Q. Yang, and Y.-Q. Zhang,From squared amplitudes to energy correlators, arXiv:2408.04222

    arXiv

  28. [28]

    H. Chen, I. Moult, X. Zhang, and H. X. Zhu,Rethinking jets with energy correlators: Tracks, resummation, and analytic continuation,Phys. Rev. D102(2020), no. 5 054012, [arXiv:2004.11381]

    arXiv 2020

  29. [29]

    P. T. Komiske, I. Moult, J. Thaler, and H. X. Zhu,Analyzing N-Point Energy Correlators inside Jets with CMS Open Data,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023), no. 5 051901, [arXiv:2201.07800]

    arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    Lee and I

    K. Lee and I. W. Stewart,Dihadron Fragmentation and the Confinement Transition in Energy Correlators,Phys. Rev. Lett.136(2026), no. 8 081902, [arXiv:2507.11495]

    arXiv 2026

  31. [31]

    Chang, H

    C.-H. Chang, H. Chen, X. Liu, D. Simmons-Duffin, F. Yuan, and H. X. Zhu,Quantum Scaling in Energy Correlators beyond the Confinement Transition,Phys. Rev. Lett.136 (2026), no. 8 081903, [arXiv:2507.15923]

    arXiv 2026

  32. [32]

    Z.-B. Kang, A. Metz, D. Pitonyak, and C. Zhang,Dihadron Fragmentation Framework for Near-Side Energy-Energy Correlators,Phys. Rev. Lett.136(2026), no. 8 081905, [arXiv:2507.17444]

    arXiv 2026

  33. [33]

    K. Lee, B. Meçaj, and I. Moult,Conformal collider physics meets LHC data,Phys. Rev. D 111(2025), no. 1 L011502, [arXiv:2205.03414]

    arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    W. Chen, J. Gao, Y. Li, Z. Xu, X. Zhang, and H. X. Zhu,NNLL resummation for projected three-point energy correlator,JHEP05(2024) 043, [arXiv:2307.07510]. [38]Flavour Lattice A veraging Group (FLAG)Collaboration, Y. Aoki et al.,FLAG review 2024,Phys. Rev. D113(2026), no. 1 014508, [arXiv:2411.04268]

    arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Abbate, M

    R. Abbate, M. Fickinger, A. H. Hoang, V. Mateu, and I. W. Stewart,Thrust atN3LLwith Power Corrections and a Precision Global Fit forαs(mZ),Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 074021, [arXiv:1006.3080]. – 58 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  36. [36]

    Becher and M

    T. Becher and M. D. Schwartz,A precise determination ofαs from LEP thrust data using effective field theory,JHEP07(2008) 034, [arXiv:0803.0342]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  37. [37]

    A. H. Hoang, D. W. Kolodrubetz, V. Mateu, and I. W. Stewart,Precise determination of αs from theC-parameter distribution,Phys. Rev. D91(2015), no. 9 094018, [arXiv:1501.04111]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  38. [38]

    A. H. Hoang, D. W. Kolodrubetz, V. Mateu, and I. W. Stewart,C-parameter distribution at N3LL’ including power corrections,Phys. Rev. D91(2015), no. 9 094017, [arXiv:1411.6633]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  39. [39]

    M. A. Benitez, A. H. Hoang, V. Mateu, I. W. Stewart, and G. Vita,On determining αs(mZ) from dijets in e+e− thrust,JHEP07(2025) 249, [arXiv:2412.15164]

    arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    M. A. Benitez, A. Bhattacharya, A. H. Hoang, V. Mateu, M. D. Schwartz, I. W. Stewart, and X. Zhang,A Precise Determination ofαs from the Heavy Jet Mass Distribution, arXiv:2502.12253

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [41]

    Huston, K

    J. Huston, K. Rabbertz, and G. Zanderighi,Quantum Chromodynamics, arXiv:2312.14015

    arXiv

  42. [42]

    d’Enterria et al.,The strong coupling constant: state of the art and the decade ahead,J

    D. d’Enterria et al.,The strong coupling constant: state of the art and the decade ahead,J. Phys. G51(2024), no. 9 090501, [arXiv:2203.08271]. [47]CMSCollaboration, A. Hayrapetyan et al.,Measurement of Energy Correlators inside Jets and Determination of the Strong CouplingαS(mZ),Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024), no. 7 071903, [arXiv:2402.13864]. [48]FCCCollabora...

    arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    H. Chen, P. F. Monni, Z. Xu, and H. X. Zhu,Perturbative evolution of hadronization effects in energy correlators,talk by Hao Chen at SCET 2024(2024)

    2024

  44. [44]

    K. Lee, A. Pathak, I. W. Stewart, and Z. Sun,Nonperturbative Effects in Energy Correlators: From Characterizing Confinement Transition to Improvingαs Extraction, Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024), no. 23 231902, [arXiv:2405.19396]

    arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    H. Chen, P. F. Monni, Z. Xu, and H. X. Zhu,Scaling Violation in Power Corrections to Energy Correlators from the Light-Ray Operator Product Expansion,Phys. Rev. Lett.133 (2024), no. 23 231901, [arXiv:2406.06668]

    arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Lee and G

    C. Lee and G. F. Sterman,Universality of nonperturbative effects in event shapes,eConf C0601121(2006) A001, [hep-ph/0603066]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  47. [47]

    Budhraja, H

    A. Budhraja, H. Chen, and W. J. Waalewijn,ν-point energy correletors with FastEEC: Small-x physics from LHC jets,Phys. Lett. B861(2025) 139239, [arXiv:2409.12235]

    arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Somogyi, Z

    G. Somogyi, Z. Trocsanyi, and V. Del Duca,A Subtraction scheme for computing QCD jet cross sections at NNLO: Regularization of doubly-real emissions,JHEP01(2007) 070, [hep-ph/0609042]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  49. [49]

    Somogyi and Z

    G. Somogyi and Z. Trocsanyi,A Subtraction scheme for computing QCD jet cross sections at NNLO: Regularization of real-virtual emission,JHEP01(2007) 052, [hep-ph/0609043]. – 59 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  50. [50]

    Aglietti, V

    U. Aglietti, V. Del Duca, C. Duhr, G. Somogyi, and Z. Trocsanyi,Analytic integration of real-virtual counterterms in NNLO jet cross sections. I.,JHEP09(2008) 107, [arXiv:0807.0514]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  51. [51]

    Catani and M

    S. Catani and M. H. Seymour,The Dipole formalism for the calculation of QCD jet cross-sections at next-to-leading order,Phys. Lett. B378(1996) 287–301, [hep-ph/9602277]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  52. [52]

    Catani and M

    S. Catani and M. H. Seymour,A General algorithm for calculating jet cross-sections in NLO QCD,Nucl. Phys. B485(1997) 291–419, [hep-ph/9605323]. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 510, 503–504 (1998)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  53. [53]

    Gehrmann-De Ridder, T

    A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann, E. W. N. Glover, and G. Heinrich,EERAD3: Event shapes and jet rates in electron-positron annihilation at orderα3 s,Comput. Phys. Commun.185(2014) 3331, [arXiv:1402.4140]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  54. [54]

    B. C. Aveleira, A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann, N. Glover, G. Heinrich, and C. T. Preuss,EERAD3 version 2: QCD corrections in hadronic colour-singlet decays,SciPost Phys. Codeb.59(2025) 1, [arXiv:2503.20610]

    arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    P. J. Rijken and W. L. van Neerven,O (alpha-s**2) contributions to the longitudinal fragmentation function in e+ e- annihilation,Phys. Lett. B386(1996) 422–428, [hep-ph/9604436]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  56. [56]

    P. J. Rijken and W. L. van Neerven,Higher order QCD corrections to the transverse and longitudinal fragmentation functions in electron - positron annihilation,Nucl. Phys. B487 (1997) 233–282, [hep-ph/9609377]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  57. [57]

    P. J. Rijken and W. L. van Neerven,O (alpha-s**2) contributions to the asymmetric fragmentation function in e+ e- annihilation,Phys. Lett. B392(1997) 207–215, [hep-ph/9609379]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  58. [58]

    Mitov and S.-O

    A. Mitov and S.-O. Moch,QCD Corrections to Semi-Inclusive Hadron Production in Electron-Positron Annihilation at Two Loops,Nucl. Phys. B751(2006) 18–52, [hep-ph/0604160]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  59. [59]

    Mitov, S

    A. Mitov, S. Moch, and A. Vogt,Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order Evolution of Non-Singlet Fragmentation Functions,Phys. Lett. B638(2006) 61–67, [hep-ph/0604053]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  60. [60]

    Moch and A

    S. Moch and A. Vogt,On third-order timelike splitting functions and top-mediated Higgs decay into hadrons,Phys. Lett. B659(2008) 290–296, [arXiv:0709.3899]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  61. [61]

    A. A. Almasy, S. Moch, and A. Vogt,On the Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order Evolution of Flavour-Singlet Fragmentation Functions,Nucl. Phys. B854(2012) 133–152, [arXiv:1107.2263]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  62. [62]

    Chen, T.-Z

    H. Chen, T.-Z. Yang, H. X. Zhu, and Y. J. Zhu,Analytic Continuation and Reciprocity Relation for Collinear Splitting in QCD,Chin. Phys. C45(2021), no. 4 043101, [arXiv:2006.10534]

    arXiv 2021

  63. [63]

    Gehrmann, A

    T. Gehrmann, A. von Manteuffel, V. Sotnikov, and T.-Z. Yang,CompleteN2 f contributions to four-loop pure-singlet splitting functions,JHEP01(2024) 029, [arXiv:2308.07958]

    arXiv 2024

  64. [64]

    Falcioni, F

    G. Falcioni, F. Herzog, S. Moch, and A. Vogt,Four-loop splitting functions in QCD – The quark-quark case,Phys. Lett. B842(2023) 137944, [arXiv:2302.07593]

    arXiv 2023

  65. [65]

    Falcioni, F

    G. Falcioni, F. Herzog, S. Moch, and A. Vogt,Four-loop splitting functions in QCD – The gluon-to-quark case,Phys. Lett. B846(2023) 138215, [arXiv:2307.04158]. – 60 –

    arXiv 2023

  66. [66]

    Falcioni, F

    G. Falcioni, F. Herzog, S. Moch, A. Pelloni, and A. Vogt,Four-loop splitting functions in QCD – The quark-to-gluon case,Phys. Lett. B856(2024) 138906, [arXiv:2404.09701]

    arXiv 2024

  67. [67]

    Falcioni, F

    G. Falcioni, F. Herzog, S. Moch, A. Pelloni, and A. Vogt,Four-loop splitting functions in QCD – the gluon-gluon case –,Phys. Lett. B860(2025) 139194, [arXiv:2410.08089]

    arXiv 2025

  68. [68]

    Falcioni, F

    G. Falcioni, F. Herzog, S. Moch, A. Pelloni, and A. Vogt,Additional results on the four-loop flavour-singlet splitting functions in QCD,Phys. Lett. B875(2026) 140278, [arXiv:2512.10783]

    arXiv 2026

  69. [69]

    Nogueira,Automatic feynman graph generation,Journal of Computational Physics105 (1993), no

    P. Nogueira,Automatic feynman graph generation,Journal of Computational Physics105 (1993), no. 2 279–289

    1993

  70. [70]

    J. A. M. Vermaseren,New features of FORM,math-ph/0010025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  71. [71]

    Kuipers, T

    J. Kuipers, T. Ueda, J. A. M. Vermaseren, and J. Vollinga,FORM version 4.0,Comput. Phys. Commun.184(2013) 1453–1467, [arXiv:1203.6543]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  72. [72]

    Ruijl, T

    B. Ruijl, T. Ueda, and J. Vermaseren,FORM version 4.2,arXiv:1707.06453

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  73. [73]

    van Ritbergen, A

    T. van Ritbergen, A. N. Schellekens, and J. A. M. Vermaseren,Group theory factors for Feynman diagrams,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A14(1999) 41–96, [hep-ph/9802376]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  74. [74]

    Mertig, M

    R. Mertig, M. Bohm, and A. Denner,FEYN CALC: Computer algebraic calculation of Feynman amplitudes,Comput. Phys. Commun.64(1991) 345–359

    1991

  75. [75]

    Shtabovenko, R

    V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana,New Developments in FeynCalc 9.0,Comput. Phys. Commun.207(2016) 432–444, [arXiv:1601.01167]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  76. [76]

    Shtabovenko, R

    V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana,FeynCalc 9.3: New features and improvements,Comput. Phys. Commun.256(2020) 107478, [arXiv:2001.04407]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  77. [77]

    Shtabovenko, R

    V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana,FeynCalc 10: Do multiloop integrals dream of computer codes?,arXiv:2312.14089

    arXiv

  78. [78]

    R. N. Lee,Presenting LiteRed: a tool for the Loop InTEgrals REDuction, arXiv:1212.2685

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  79. [79]

    R. N. Lee,LiteRed 1.4: a powerful tool for reduction of multiloop integrals,J. Phys. Conf. Ser.523(2014) 012059, [arXiv:1310.1145]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  80. [80]

    A. V. Smirnov and F. S. Chukharev,FIRE6: Feynman Integral REduction with modular arithmetic,Comput. Phys. Commun.247(2020) 106877, [arXiv:1901.07808]

    arXiv 2020

Showing first 80 references.