pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.02728 · v1 · pith:OS3OD46Wnew · submitted 2026-06-01 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO· hep-th

Deconstructing the Extra-Dimensional Axion

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 13:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.COhep-th
keywords extra-dimensional axionmoose modelWilson lineChern-Simons termWess-Zumino-Witten termaxion qualityfractional instantonsdeconstruction
0
0 comments X

The pith

A four-dimensional moose gauge theory reproduces the axion from a five-dimensional orbifold while preserving its shift symmetry.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a renormalizable four-dimensional quiver model whose link scalars and gauged Wess-Zumino-Witten term together reproduce the Wilson-line axion and its gluon coupling that arise from a five-dimensional U(1) gauge theory on an orbifold. The construction ensures the axion quality through the same nonlocal suppression that appears when fields propagate in the extra dimension. Non-perturbative effects from fractional instantons remain exponentially suppressed inside the regime that matches the higher-dimensional description. A sympathetic reader would care because the model supplies an explicit, controllable four-dimensional setting in which the axion mechanism and its protection can be studied without reference to the extra dimension itself.

Core claim

We present a four-dimensional deconstruction of the extra-dimensional axion arising from a U(1) gauge theory in a five-dimensional orbifold, where the axion is identified with the Wilson line of the U(1) gauge field and its coupling to QCD is generated by a 5D Chern-Simons term. We construct the corresponding 4D moose gauge theory with link scalar fields, in which the axion emerges as a collective pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone boson. The axion-gluon coupling is described by a gauged Wess-Zumino-Witten term, providing the 4D counterpart of the 5D CS term.

What carries the argument

The 4D moose (quiver) gauge theory with link scalar fields whose collective phase supplies the axion, together with the gauged Wess-Zumino-Witten term that implements the axion-gluon coupling.

If this is right

  • The axion shift symmetry and its quality are realized transparently through the structure of the link fields and the Wess-Zumino-Witten term.
  • Axion potentials induced by bulk matter fields and boundary operators exhibit the same nonlocal suppression found in the extra-dimensional setup.
  • The framework remains renormalizable in four dimensions while reproducing the higher-dimensional phenomenology.
  • The suppression of fractional instantons holds only inside the regime that corresponds to the five-dimensional description.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same deconstruction technique could be applied to other topological terms that normally require extra dimensions.
  • Lattice simulations of the four-dimensional quiver theory could directly test the size dependence of the instanton suppression.
  • Model builders could use the four-dimensional language to embed axion-like particles in purely four-dimensional ultraviolet completions.

Load-bearing premise

Fractional instantons remain exponentially suppressed whenever their inverse size stays below the five-dimensional cutoff scale.

What would settle it

A measurable axion potential generated by instantons whose inverse size exceeds the five-dimensional cutoff scale would show that the suppression assumed in the deconstruction has broken down.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.02728 by Junxuan Xu, Motoo Suzuki, Shihwen Hor, Yuichiro Nakai.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic illustration of the deconstructed U(1)×SU(3) setup. Adjacent sites are connected by the link fields Φj and Σj , while the charged matter fields Ψj and Qj are localized at the sites. The absence of the U(1) gauge groups at the endpoints corresponds to the Dirichlet boundary condition for Aµ(x, y) in 5D. Qn(x) = Z πR 0 dy f Q n (y)Q(x, y), n ≥ 0 , (2.40) where the KK modes are defined as Q(x, y) = … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a four-dimensional deconstruction of the extra-dimensional axion arising from a $U(1)$ gauge theory in a five-dimensional orbifold, where the axion is identified with the Wilson line of the $U(1)$ gauge field and its coupling to QCD is generated by a 5D Chern-Simons (CS) term. We construct the corresponding 4D moose (quiver) gauge theory with link scalar fields, in which the axion emerges as a collective pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone boson. The axion-gluon coupling is described by a gauged Wess-Zumino-Witten term, providing the 4D counterpart of the 5D CS term. We further analyze non-perturbative effects from zero-mode and ``fractional'' instanton configurations. While the latter is exponentially suppressed in the regime corresponding to the 5D description, ensuring consistency with the higher-dimensional picture, we point out that this suppression can break down for smaller instantons whose inverse size exceeds the 5D cutoff scale, leading to a potentially significant effect. We also study axion potentials induced by bulk matter fields and boundary-localized symmetry-breaking operators, reproducing the characteristic nonlocal suppression associated with propagation in the extra dimension. Our construction provides a renormalizable 4D framework with a transparent understanding of the axion shift symmetry and its quality.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs a 4D moose (quiver) gauge theory that deconstructs the extra-dimensional axion arising from a 5D U(1) gauge theory on an orbifold, with the axion identified as the Wilson line. The axion-gluon coupling is realized via a gauged Wess-Zumino-Witten term corresponding to the 5D Chern-Simons term. The work analyzes zero-mode and fractional instanton contributions, noting exponential suppression of the latter in the regime matching the 5D description, and examines axion potentials induced by bulk matter fields and boundary-localized operators, reproducing the characteristic nonlocal suppression of extra-dimensional propagation. The construction is presented as a renormalizable 4D framework providing transparent insight into the axion shift symmetry and its quality.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work supplies a useful renormalizable 4D deconstruction that makes the origin of axion quality via nonlocal effects explicit and transparent, with the gauged WZW term providing a direct counterpart to the 5D CS term. This could facilitate further model-building and non-perturbative studies in extra-dimensional axion scenarios.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract (non-perturbative effects paragraph)] Abstract, paragraph on non-perturbative effects: The central claim of reproducing the 5D axion quality and nonlocal suppression requires that fractional instantons remain exponentially suppressed. The manuscript itself states that this suppression breaks down for smaller instantons whose inverse size exceeds the 5D cutoff scale, leading to a potentially significant effect. No explicit calculation or bound is provided showing how (or whether) such contributions are damped within the 4D moose model via the link scalars or gauged WZW term, leaving the consistency with the higher-dimensional picture unverified in this regime.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive overall assessment and the detailed comment regarding the non-perturbative effects. We address the point below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: Abstract, paragraph on non-perturbative effects: The central claim of reproducing the 5D axion quality and nonlocal suppression requires that fractional instantons remain exponentially suppressed. The manuscript itself states that this suppression breaks down for smaller instantons whose inverse size exceeds the 5D cutoff scale, leading to a potentially significant effect. No explicit calculation or bound is provided showing how (or whether) such contributions are damped within the 4D moose model via the link scalars or gauged WZW term, leaving the consistency with the higher-dimensional picture unverified in this regime.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript highlights the potential breakdown for small instantons but does not supply an explicit 4D calculation of additional damping. Our position is that the central claim is limited to the regime in which the 4D moose reproduces the 5D orbifold (instanton sizes larger than the cutoff scale set by the lattice spacing). In that regime the exponential suppression follows from the same collective PNGB dynamics and link-scalar structure that deconstruct the 5D Wilson line and CS term; no further mechanism is required. Outside this regime both the 5D effective theory and its deconstruction lose validity, so the question of consistency does not arise. We will revise the abstract and the relevant discussion section to state this domain-of-validity limitation more explicitly. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; construction matches 5D by design but analysis is independent

full rationale

The paper explicitly constructs a 4D moose model with link scalars and gauged WZW term to reproduce the 5D orbifold axion, Wilson line, and CS-induced coupling, including nonlocal suppression from bulk propagation. This matching is definitional to the deconstruction approach rather than a derived prediction. The non-perturbative analysis of zero-mode and fractional instantons, including the explicit caveat on suppression breakdown for small instantons exceeding the 5D cutoff, adds independent content without reducing to fitted inputs or self-citation chains. No load-bearing self-citations, ansatze smuggled via prior work, or uniqueness theorems from the same authors appear in the text. The derivation remains self-contained against the 5D benchmark it targets.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Limited information available from abstract only; the model relies on standard 5D orbifold assumptions and the existence of a 5D CS term to generate the 4D coupling.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption U(1) gauge theory on 5D orbifold with CS term produces axion as Wilson line with QCD coupling
    Invoked as the starting point for the deconstruction.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5782 in / 1258 out tokens · 25214 ms · 2026-06-28T13:20:22.661327+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Big Axions

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Big axions are axion models from collective spontaneous breaking of a delocalized network of U(1) symmetries that realize high-quality accidental global symmetries, solve the strong CP problem, and may explain dark matter.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 46 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn,CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett.38(1977) 1440

  2. [2]

    Weinberg,A New Light Boson?,Phys

    S. Weinberg,A New Light Boson?,Phys. Rev. Lett.40(1978) 223

  3. [3]

    Wilczek,Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons, Phys

    F. Wilczek,Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett.40(1978) 279. 53

  4. [4]

    Dine and N

    M. Dine and N. Seiberg,String Theory and the Strong CP Problem,Nucl. Phys. B 273(1986) 109

  5. [5]

    S. M. Barr and D. Seckel,Planck scale corrections to axion models,Phys. Rev. D 46(1992) 539

  6. [6]

    Kamionkowski and J

    M. Kamionkowski and J. March-Russell,Planck scale physics and the Peccei-Quinn mechanism,Phys. Lett. B282(1992) 137 [hep-th/9202003]

  7. [7]

    Kamionkowski and J

    M. Kamionkowski and J. March-Russell,Are textures natural?,Phys. Rev. Lett. 69(1992) 1485 [hep-th/9201063]

  8. [8]

    Holman, S

    R. Holman, S. D. H. Hsu, T. W. Kephart, E. W. Kolb, R. Watkins and L. M. Widrow,Solutions to the strong CP problem in a world with gravity,Phys. Lett. B 282(1992) 132 [hep-ph/9203206]

  9. [9]

    Kallosh, A

    R. Kallosh, A. D. Linde, D. A. Linde and L. Susskind,Gravity and global symmetries,Phys. Rev. D52(1995) 912 [hep-th/9502069]

  10. [10]

    L. M. Carpenter, M. Dine and G. Festuccia,Dynamics of the Peccei Quinn Scale, Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 125017 [0906.1273]

  11. [11]

    J. E. Kim,A COMPOSITE INVISIBLE AXION,Phys. Rev. D31(1985) 1733

  12. [12]

    Choi and J

    K. Choi and J. E. Kim,DYNAMICAL AXION,Phys. Rev. D32(1985) 1828

  13. [13]

    Randall,Composite axion models and Planck scale physics,Phys

    L. Randall,Composite axion models and Planck scale physics,Phys. Lett. B284 (1992) 77

  14. [14]

    K. I. Izawa, T. Watari and T. Yanagida,Higher dimensional QCD without the strong CP problem,Phys. Lett. B534(2002) 93 [hep-ph/0202171]

  15. [15]

    Yamada, T

    M. Yamada, T. T. Yanagida and K. Yonekura,Cosmologically safe QCD axion without fine-tuning,Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) 051801 [1510.06504]

  16. [16]

    Redi and R

    M. Redi and R. Sato,Composite Accidental Axions,JHEP05(2016) 104 [1602.05427]

  17. [17]

    Di Luzio, E

    L. Di Luzio, E. Nardi and L. Ubaldi,Accidental Peccei-Quinn symmetry protected to arbitrary order,Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) 011801 [1704.01122]

  18. [18]

    Lillard and T

    B. Lillard and T. M. P. Tait,A Composite Axion from a Supersymmetric Product Group,JHEP11(2017) 005 [1707.04261]. 54

  19. [19]

    Lillard and T

    B. Lillard and T. M. P. Tait,A High Quality Composite Axion,JHEP11(2018) 199 [1811.03089]

  20. [20]

    M. B. Gavela, M. Ibe, P. Quilez and T. T. Yanagida,Automatic Peccei–Quinn symmetry,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 542 [1812.08174]

  21. [21]

    Lee and W

    H.-S. Lee and W. Yin,Peccei-Quinn symmetry from a hidden gauge group structure,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 015041 [1811.04039]

  22. [22]

    Yamada and T

    M. Yamada and T. T. Yanagida,A natural and simple UV completion of the QCD axion model,Phys. Lett. B816(2021) 136267 [2101.10350]

  23. [23]

    Ishida, S

    H. Ishida, S. Matsuzaki and X.-C. Peng,Peccei–Quinn symmetry breaking via asymptotically safe dynamical scalegenesis: a walking axicolor and axion,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 107 [2103.13644]

  24. [24]

    Contino, A

    R. Contino, A. Podo and F. Revello,Chiral models of composite axions and accidental Peccei-Quinn symmetry,JHEP04(2022) 180 [2112.09635]

  25. [25]

    Sato and S

    R. Sato and S. Takeshita,QCD axion from chiral gauge theories,2508.21820

  26. [26]

    S. Hor, Y. Nakai, M. Suzuki and J. Xu,Specially Embedding a Composite Axion Model,2604.26010

  27. [27]

    Nakai and M

    Y. Nakai and M. Suzuki,Axion Quality from Superconformal Dynamics,Phys. Lett. B816(2021) 136239 [2102.01329]

  28. [28]

    Nakagawa, Y

    S. Nakagawa, Y. Nakai, M. Yamada and Y. Zhang,Dynamics of superconformal axion: Quality and scalegenesis,Phys. Lett. B849(2024) 138447 [2309.06964]

  29. [29]

    Nakagawa, Y

    S. Nakagawa, Y. Nakai, J. Xu and Y. Zhang,High quality QCD axion via electric-magnetic duality,JHEP06(2025) 005 [2412.08931]

  30. [30]

    Flacke, B

    T. Flacke, B. Gripaios, J. March-Russell and D. Maybury,Warped axions,JHEP 01(2007) 061 [hep-ph/0611278]

  31. [31]

    P. Cox, T. Gherghetta and M. D. Nguyen,A Holographic Perspective on the Axion Quality Problem,JHEP01(2020) 188 [1911.09385]

  32. [32]

    Bonnefoy, P

    Q. Bonnefoy, P. Cox, E. Dudas, T. Gherghetta and M. D. Nguyen,Flavoured Warped Axion,JHEP04(2021) 084 [2012.09728]. 55

  33. [33]

    S. J. Lee, Y. Nakai and M. Suzuki,High quality axion via a doubly composite dynamics,JHEP03(2022) 038 [2112.08083]

  34. [34]

    Cs´ aki, E

    C. Cs´ aki, E. Kuflik, W. Xue and T. Youn,The Holographic QCD Axion in Five Dimensions,2604.02411

  35. [35]

    V. A. Rubakov,Grand unification and heavy axion,JETP Lett.65(1997) 621 [hep-ph/9703409]

  36. [36]

    Berezhiani, L

    Z. Berezhiani, L. Gianfagna and M. Giannotti,Strong CP problem and mirror world: The Weinberg-Wilczek axion revisited,Phys. Lett. B500(2001) 286 [hep-ph/0009290]

  37. [37]

    Hook,Anomalous solutions to the strong CP problem,Phys

    A. Hook,Anomalous solutions to the strong CP problem,Phys. Rev. Lett.114 (2015) 141801 [1411.3325]

  38. [38]

    Fukuda, K

    H. Fukuda, K. Harigaya, M. Ibe and T. T. Yanagida,Model of visible QCD axion, Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 015021 [1504.06084]

  39. [39]

    Gherghetta, N

    T. Gherghetta, N. Nagata and M. Shifman,A Visible QCD Axion from an Enlarged Color Group,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 115010 [1604.01127]

  40. [40]

    Dimopoulos, A

    S. Dimopoulos, A. Hook, J. Huang and G. Marques-Tavares,A collider observable QCD axion,JHEP11(2016) 052 [1606.03097]

  41. [41]

    Gherghetta and M

    T. Gherghetta and M. D. Nguyen,A Composite Higgs with a Heavy Composite Axion,JHEP12(2020) 094 [2007.10875]

  42. [42]

    D. S. M. Alves and N. Weiner,A viable QCD axion in the MeV mass range, JHEP07(2018) 092 [1710.03764]

  43. [43]

    J. Liu, N. McGinnis, C. E. M. Wagner and X.-P. Wang,Challenges for a QCD Axion at the 10 MeV Scale,JHEP05(2021) 138 [2102.10118]

  44. [44]

    Girmohanta, S

    S. Girmohanta, S. Nakagawa, Y. Nakai and J. Xu,How viable is a QCD axion near 10 MeV?,JHEP10(2024) 153 [2405.13425]

  45. [45]

    T. Iwai, R. Sato, K. Tobioka and T. Yamanaka,Excluding MeV-scale QCD axions byK L →π 0π0aat KTeV,2602.15117

  46. [46]

    Cheng and D

    H.-C. Cheng and D. E. Kaplan,Axions and a gauged Peccei-Quinn symmetry, hep-ph/0103346. 56

  47. [47]

    Harigaya, M

    K. Harigaya, M. Ibe, K. Schmitz and T. T. Yanagida,Peccei-Quinn symmetry from a gauged discrete R symmetry,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 075022 [1308.1227]

  48. [48]

    Fukuda, M

    H. Fukuda, M. Ibe, M. Suzuki and T. T. Yanagida,A ”gauged”U(1) Peccei–Quinn symmetry,Phys. Lett. B771(2017) 327 [1703.01112]

  49. [49]

    Fukuda, M

    H. Fukuda, M. Ibe, M. Suzuki and T. T. Yanagida,Gauged Peccei-Quinn symmetry — A case of simultaneous breaking of SUSY and PQ symmetry,JHEP 07(2018) 128 [1803.00759]

  50. [50]

    M. Ibe, M. Suzuki and T. T. Yanagida,B−Las a Gauged Peccei-Quinn Symmetry,JHEP08(2018) 049 [1805.10029]

  51. [51]

    G. Choi, M. Suzuki and T. T. Yanagida,QCD axion from a spontaneously broken B−Lgauge symmetry,JHEP07(2020) 048 [2005.10415]

  52. [52]

    Choi,A QCD axion from higher dimensional gauge field,Phys

    K.-w. Choi,A QCD axion from higher dimensional gauge field,Phys. Rev. Lett. 92(2004) 101602 [hep-ph/0308024]

  53. [53]

    Reece,Extra-dimensional axion expectations,JHEP07(2025) 130 [2406.08543]

    M. Reece,Extra-dimensional axion expectations,JHEP07(2025) 130 [2406.08543]

  54. [54]

    Craig and M

    N. Craig and M. Kongsore,High-quality axions from higher-form symmetries in extra dimensions,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 015047 [2408.10295]

  55. [55]

    K. Choi, C. H. Lee and C. S. Shin,Axion Quality in Warped Extra-Dimension, 2604.08700

  56. [56]

    Arkani-Hamed, A

    N. Arkani-Hamed, A. G. Cohen and H. Georgi,(De)constructing dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.86(2001) 4757 [hep-th/0104005]

  57. [57]

    C. T. Hill, S. Pokorski and J. Wang,Gauge Invariant Effective Lagrangian for Kaluza-Klein Modes,Phys. Rev. D64(2001) 105005 [hep-th/0104035]

  58. [58]

    Arkani-Hamed, A

    N. Arkani-Hamed, A. G. Cohen and H. Georgi,Electroweak symmetry breaking from dimensional deconstruction,Phys. Lett. B513(2001) 232 [hep-ph/0105239]

  59. [59]

    Cheng, C

    H.-C. Cheng, C. T. Hill, S. Pokorski and J. Wang,The Standard Model in the Latticized Bulk,Phys. Rev. D64(2001) 065007 [hep-th/0104179]

  60. [60]

    Arkani-Hamed, H.-C

    N. Arkani-Hamed, H.-C. Cheng, P. Creminelli and L. Randall,Extra natural inflation,Phys. Rev. Lett.90(2003) 221302 [hep-th/0301218]. 57

  61. [61]

    C. T. Hill and A. K. Leibovich,Natural Theories of Ultralow Mass PNGB’s: Axions and Quintessence,Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 075010 [hep-ph/0205237]

  62. [62]

    C. T. Hill and C. K. Zachos,Dimensional deconstruction and Wess-Zumino-Witten terms,Phys. Rev. D71(2005) 046002 [hep-th/0411157]

  63. [63]

    Skiba and D

    W. Skiba and D. Tucker-Smith,Localized fermions and anomaly inflow via deconstruction,Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 095002 [hep-ph/0201056]

  64. [64]

    Poppitz and Y

    E. Poppitz and Y. Shirman,The Strength of small instanton amplitudes in gauge theories with compact extra dimensions,JHEP07(2002) 041 [hep-th/0204075]

  65. [65]

    Gherghetta, V

    T. Gherghetta, V. V. Khoze, A. Pomarol and Y. Shirman,The Axion Mass from 5D Small Instantons,JHEP03(2020) 063 [2001.05610]

  66. [66]

    Arkani-Hamed, A

    N. Arkani-Hamed, A. G. Cohen and H. Georgi,Anomalies on orbifolds,Phys. Lett. B516(2001) 395 [hep-th/0103135]

  67. [67]

    H. Abe, T. Kobayashi, N. Maru and K. Yoshioka,Field localization in warped gauge theories,Phys. Rev. D67(2003) 045019 [hep-ph/0205344]

  68. [68]

    Manohar and G

    A. Manohar and G. W. Moore,Anomalous Inequivalence of Phenomenological Theories,Nucl. Phys. B243(1984) 55

  69. [69]

    Csaki, J

    C. Csaki, J. Hubisz and P. Meade,TASI Lectures on Electroweak Symmetry Breaking from Extra Dimensions, 2005

  70. [70]

    A. A. Belavin, A. M. Polyakov, A. S. Schwartz and Y. S. Tyupkin,Pseudoparticle Solutions of the Yang-Mills Equations,Phys. Lett. B59(1975) 85

  71. [71]

    ’t Hooft,Computation of the Quantum Effects Due to a Four-Dimensional Pseudoparticle,Phys

    G. ’t Hooft,Computation of the Quantum Effects Due to a Four-Dimensional Pseudoparticle,Phys. Rev. D14(1976) 3432

  72. [72]

    Affleck,On Constrained Instantons,Nucl

    I. Affleck,On Constrained Instantons,Nucl. Phys. B191(1981) 429

  73. [73]

    Cs´ aki, M

    C. Cs´ aki, M. Ruhdorfer and Y. Shirman,UV Sensitivity of the Axion Mass from Instantons in Partially Broken Gauge Groups,JHEP04(2020) 031 [1912.02197]

  74. [74]

    Randall and R

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum,A Large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension,Phys. Rev. Lett.83(1999) 3370 [hep-ph/9905221]

  75. [75]

    Cheng, C

    H.-C. Cheng, C. T. Hill and J. Wang,Dynamical Electroweak Breaking and Latticized Extra Dimensions,Phys. Rev. D64(2001) 095003 [hep-ph/0105323]. 58

  76. [76]

    Falkowski and H

    A. Falkowski and H. D. Kim,Running of gauge couplings in AdS(5) via deconstruction,JHEP08(2002) 052 [hep-ph/0208058]

  77. [77]

    Randall, Y

    L. Randall, Y. Shadmi and N. Weiner,Deconstruction and gauge theories in AdS(5),JHEP01(2003) 055 [hep-th/0208120]

  78. [78]

    de Blas, A

    J. de Blas, A. Falkowski, M. Perez-Victoria and S. Pokorski,Tools for deconstructing gauge theories in AdS(5),JHEP08(2006) 061 [hep-th/0605150]

  79. [79]

    Burdman, N

    G. Burdman, N. Fonseca and L. de Lima,Full-hierarchy Quiver Theories of Electroweak Symmetry Breaking and Fermion Masses,JHEP01(2013) 094 [1210.5568]

  80. [80]

    Nakai,Deconstruction, Holography and Emergent Supersymmetry,JHEP03 (2015) 101 [1412.3486]

    Y. Nakai,Deconstruction, Holography and Emergent Supersymmetry,JHEP03 (2015) 101 [1412.3486]

Showing first 80 references.