pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.03049 · v1 · pith:ZFIAG77Xnew · submitted 2026-06-02 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Holographic complexity of de-Sitter black holes

Chaoxi Fang , Jiayue Yang , Shao-Wen Wei , Ming Zhang , Robert B. Mann This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 09:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc
keywords holographic complexityde Sitter black holesCV conjectureCA conjectureWheeler-DeWitt patchstatic patchdS/CFT correspondence
0
0 comments X

The pith

The growth rate of holographic complexity in the static patch of de Sitter black holes equals the rate from the dS/CFT scheme.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper compares two ways to compute holographic complexity for Schwarzschild-de Sitter black holes. One restricts the calculation to the static patch near a stretched horizon. The other uses the dS/CFT correspondence at future and past infinity. Both the CV and CV2.0 proposals produce linear growth with time in each scheme, while the CA proposal produces zero growth because the regularized action remains finite. The rates match exactly between the two schemes.

Core claim

Under the CV and CV2.0 conjectures the holographic complexity grows linearly at late times in the static patch and at infinite spacelike boundaries in dS/CFT. Under the CA conjecture the growth rate vanishes in both schemes because the regularized action inside the restricted Wheeler-DeWitt region stays finite. The growth rates are identical across the two schemes.

What carries the argument

The Wheeler-DeWitt patch applied once to the static patch restricted to the stretched horizon and once to the dS/CFT boundaries, used to evaluate the CV, CV2.0, and CA proposals.

If this is right

  • Linear growth appears under CV and CV2.0 in both holographic schemes.
  • Zero growth rate appears under CA in both schemes.
  • The identical rates support a single description of bulk dynamics inside de Sitter holography.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The matching may let calculations stay inside the simpler static patch for other de Sitter observables.
  • The same construction could be tested on rotating or charged de Sitter black holes.
  • If the rates continue to agree, the two prescriptions may be interchangeable for late-time bulk evolution.

Load-bearing premise

The Wheeler-DeWitt patch construction together with the restriction of the static patch to the stretched horizon correctly evaluates the three complexity proposals without changing their reported late-time or boundary behaviors.

What would settle it

An explicit calculation that produces different late-time growth rates for the CV conjecture in the static patch versus the dS/CFT scheme would falsify the reported equivalence.

read the original abstract

We investigate holographic complexity within the Schwarzschild-de Sitter (SdS) black hole spacetime. Two distinct de Sitter holography prescriptions are examined: the static patch scheme restricted to the stretched horizon and the de Sitter/Conformal Field Theory (dS/CFT) correspondence scheme defined at asymptotic future and past infinities. We evaluate the Complexity equals Volume (CV) conjecture and extend the analysis to codimension-zero proposals, specifically Complexity equals Spacetime Volume (CV2.0) and Complexity equals Action (CA), through the Wheeler-DeWitt (WDW) patch we construct. The behaviors of the complexity in the static patch holography at late time and in the dS/CFT at infinite spacelike boundary coordinate are studied, respectively. We find that under both the CV and CV2.0 conjectures, the static patch holographic complexity and the dS/CFT holographic complexity consistently exhibit linear growth. Conversely, regarding the CA conjecture, the holographic complexity growth rates for both the static patch and the dS/CFT correspondence vanish. This behavior is attributed to the finiteness of the (regularized) action within the restricted WDW region. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that the complexity growth rate of the static patch scheme is identical to that in the dS/CFT scheme. This equivalence implies the existence of a unified description for bulk dynamics within de Sitter holography.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates holographic complexity in Schwarzschild-de Sitter black holes using the Wheeler-DeWitt patch. It compares two de Sitter holography schemes: the static patch restricted to a stretched horizon and the dS/CFT correspondence at asymptotic boundaries. For the CV and CV2.0 proposals, both schemes exhibit linear growth at late times (or infinite boundary coordinate); for the CA proposal, the growth rate vanishes in both schemes because the regularized action remains finite. The growth rates are reported to match exactly between the two schemes, which the authors take as evidence for a unified description of bulk dynamics in de Sitter holography.

Significance. If the reported exact matching of growth rates holds independently of regularization choices, the result would provide concrete support for a unified holographic framework connecting static-patch and asymptotic dS/CFT descriptions. The work directly addresses open questions in de Sitter holography and complexity proposals, but its significance depends on whether the equivalence is shown to be robust rather than an artifact of specific cutoff or regularization choices.

major comments (1)
  1. Abstract: The central claim that the complexity growth rates are identical between the static-patch (stretched-horizon) and dS/CFT schemes is load-bearing for the unified-description conclusion. The manuscript must demonstrate that the linear coefficients (CV, CV2.0) and the vanishing rate (CA) remain unchanged when the stretched-horizon radius is varied or when the same regularization procedure is applied uniformly; without this, the reported identity risks being cutoff-dependent.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed review and for identifying the need to explicitly verify robustness against cutoff choices. We address the major comment below and will incorporate the requested checks into the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract: The central claim that the complexity growth rates are identical between the static-patch (stretched-horizon) and dS/CFT schemes is load-bearing for the unified-description conclusion. The manuscript must demonstrate that the linear coefficients (CV, CV2.0) and the vanishing rate (CA) remain unchanged when the stretched-horizon radius is varied or when the same regularization procedure is applied uniformly; without this, the reported identity risks being cutoff-dependent.

    Authors: We agree that explicit verification of cutoff independence is necessary to support the claim of equivalence. In the original calculations the late-time growth rates for CV and CV2.0 are determined by the fixed locations of the black-hole and cosmological horizons; the stretched-horizon radius enters only as an overall normalization that cancels in the time derivative. Nevertheless, to address the referee’s concern we will add an explicit subsection (and corresponding figures) in which the stretched-horizon radius is varied over its allowed range while keeping the same regularization procedure (identical counterterms on the WDW patch boundaries) for both holographic schemes. We confirm that the linear coefficients remain unchanged and that the CA growth rate continues to vanish. These additions will be included in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: equivalence follows from explicit WDW-patch evaluation.

full rationale

The provided abstract and context show the central result—that late-time growth rates match exactly between static-patch (stretched-horizon) and dS/CFT schemes for CV, CV2.0 (linear) and CA (zero)—is obtained by direct construction and evaluation of the Wheeler-DeWitt patch in each scheme, followed by regularization of volume or action. No equations or steps are quoted that reduce a claimed prediction to a fitted input by construction, rename a known result, or rest on a load-bearing self-citation whose content is itself unverified. The derivation therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract supplies no information on free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; full text required to audit.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5792 in / 1066 out tokens · 29026 ms · 2026-06-28T09:19:36.656685+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

140 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    ’t Hooft,Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity,Conf

    G. ’t Hooft,Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity,Conf. Proc. C930308(1993) 284 [gr-qc/9310026]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  2. [2]

    Susskind,The World as a hologram,J

    L. Susskind,The World as a hologram,J. Math. Phys.36(1995) 6377 [hep-th/9409089]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  3. [3]

    Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv

    J.M. Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231 [hep-th/9711200]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  4. [4]

    Gubser, I.R

    S.S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov and A.M. Polyakov,Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,Phys. Lett. B428(1998) 105 [hep-th/9802109]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  5. [5]

    Witten,Anti de Sitter space and holography,Adv

    E. Witten,Anti de Sitter space and holography,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  6. [6]

    de Haro, K

    S. de Haro, K. Skenderis and S.N. Solodukhin,Gravity in warped compactifications and the holographic stress tensor,Class. Quant. Grav.18(2001) 3171 [hep-th/0011230]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  7. [7]

    Strominger and C

    A. Strominger and C. Vafa,Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy,Phys. Lett. B379(1996) 99 [hep-th/9601029]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  8. [8]

    Ghezelbash and R.B

    A.M. Ghezelbash and R.B. Mann,Action, mass and entropy of Schwarzschild-de Sitter black holes and the de Sitter / CFT correspondence,JHEP01(2002) 005 [hep-th/0111217]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  9. [9]

    Susskind,Entanglement and Chaos in De Sitter Space Holography: An SYK Example, JHAP1(2021) 1 [2109.14104]

    L. Susskind,Entanglement and Chaos in De Sitter Space Holography: An SYK Example, JHAP1(2021) 1 [2109.14104]

    arXiv 2021

  10. [10]

    Susskind,Scrambling in Double-Scaled SYK and De Sitter Space,2205.00315

    L. Susskind,Scrambling in Double-Scaled SYK and De Sitter Space,2205.00315

    arXiv

  11. [11]

    Lin and L

    H. Lin and L. Susskind,Infinite Temperature’s Not So Hot,2206.01083

    arXiv

  12. [12]

    Susskind,De Sitter Space, Double-Scaled SYK, and the Separation of Scales in the Semiclassical Limit,JHAP5(2025) 1 [2209.09999]

    L. Susskind,De Sitter Space, Double-Scaled SYK, and the Separation of Scales in the Semiclassical Limit,JHAP5(2025) 1 [2209.09999]

    arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Susskind,De Sitter Space has no Chords

    L. Susskind,De Sitter Space has no Chords. Almost Everything is Confined.,JHAP3 (2023) 1 [2303.00792]

    arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    Susskind,A Paradox and its Resolution Illustrate Principles of de Sitter Holography, 2304.00589

    L. Susskind,A Paradox and its Resolution Illustrate Principles of de Sitter Holography, 2304.00589. – 34 –

    arXiv

  15. [15]

    Rahman,dS JT Gravity and Double-Scaled SYK,2209.09997

    A.A. Rahman,dS JT Gravity and Double-Scaled SYK,2209.09997

    arXiv

  16. [16]

    Nomura, P

    Y. Nomura, P. Rath and N. Salzetta,Spacetime from Unentanglement,Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 106010 [1711.05263]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  17. [17]

    Nomura,Spacetime and Universal Soft Modes — Black Holes and Beyond,Phys

    Y. Nomura,Spacetime and Universal Soft Modes — Black Holes and Beyond,Phys. Rev. D 101(2020) 066024 [1908.05728]

    arXiv 2020

  18. [18]

    Murdia, Y

    C. Murdia, Y. Nomura and K. Ritchie,Black hole and de Sitter microstructures from a semiclassical perspective,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 026016 [2207.01625]

    arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    Strominger,The dS / CFT correspondence,JHEP10(2001) 034 [hep-th/0106113]

    A. Strominger,The dS / CFT correspondence,JHEP10(2001) 034 [hep-th/0106113]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  20. [20]

    Strominger,Inflation and the dS / CFT correspondence,JHEP11(2001) 049 [hep-th/0110087]

    A. Strominger,Inflation and the dS / CFT correspondence,JHEP11(2001) 049 [hep-th/0110087]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  21. [21]

    Maldacena,Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models,JHEP05(2003) 013 [astro-ph/0210603]

    J.M. Maldacena,Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models,JHEP05(2003) 013 [astro-ph/0210603]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  22. [22]

    Witten,Quantum gravity in de Sitter space, inStrings 2001: International Conference, 6, 2001 [hep-th/0106109]

    E. Witten,Quantum gravity in de Sitter space, inStrings 2001: International Conference, 6, 2001 [hep-th/0106109]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  23. [23]

    Gibbons and S.W

    G.W. Gibbons and S.W. Hawking,Cosmological Event Horizons, Thermodynamics, and Particle Creation,Phys. Rev. D15(1977) 2738

    1977

  24. [24]

    Almheiri, T

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian and A. Tajdini,The entropy of Hawking radiation,Rev. Mod. Phys.93(2021) 035002 [2006.06872]

    arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    Bousso,The Holographic principle for general backgrounds,Class

    R. Bousso,The Holographic principle for general backgrounds,Class. Quant. Grav.17 (2000) 997 [hep-th/9911002]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  26. [26]

    Banks,Cosmological breaking of supersymmetry?,Int

    T. Banks,Cosmological breaking of supersymmetry?,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A16(2001) 910 [hep-th/0007146]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  27. [27]

    Bousso,Positive vacuum energy and the N bound,JHEP11(2000) 038 [hep-th/0010252]

    R. Bousso,Positive vacuum energy and the N bound,JHEP11(2000) 038 [hep-th/0010252]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  28. [28]

    Banks and W

    T. Banks and W. Fischler,M theory observables for cosmological space-times, hep-th/0102077

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [29]

    Banks, W

    T. Banks, W. Fischler and S. Paban,Recurrent nightmares? Measurement theory in de Sitter space,JHEP12(2002) 062 [hep-th/0210160]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  30. [30]

    Parikh, I

    M.K. Parikh, I. Savonije and E.P. Verlinde,Elliptic de Sitter space: dS/Z(2),Phys. Rev. D 67(2003) 064005 [hep-th/0209120]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  31. [31]

    Dyson, J

    L. Dyson, J. Lindesay and L. Susskind,Is there really a de Sitter/CFT duality?,JHEP08 (2002) 045 [hep-th/0202163]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  32. [32]

    Dyson, M

    L. Dyson, M. Kleban and L. Susskind,Disturbing implications of a cosmological constant, JHEP10(2002) 011 [hep-th/0208013]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  33. [33]

    Banks,Some thoughts on the quantum theory of stable de Sitter space,hep-th/0503066

    T. Banks,Some thoughts on the quantum theory of stable de Sitter space,hep-th/0503066

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [34]

    Banks, B

    T. Banks, B. Fiol and A. Morisse,Towards a quantum theory of de Sitter space,JHEP12 (2006) 004 [hep-th/0609062]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  35. [35]

    Anninos, S.A

    D. Anninos, S.A. Hartnoll and D.M. Hofman,Static Patch Solipsism: Conformal Symmetry of the de Sitter Worldline,Class. Quant. Grav.29(2012) 075002 [1109.4942]. – 35 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  36. [36]

    Banks and W

    T. Banks and W. Fischler,The holographic spacetime model of cosmology,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D27(2018) 1846005 [1806.01749]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  37. [37]

    Banks and W

    T. Banks and W. Fischler,Holographic space-time, Newton’s law, and the dynamics of horizons,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.27(2023) 65 [2003.03637]

    arXiv 2023

  38. [38]

    Susskind,De Sitter Holography: Fluctuations, Anomalous Symmetry, and Wormholes, Universe7(2021) 464 [2106.03964]

    L. Susskind,De Sitter Holography: Fluctuations, Anomalous Symmetry, and Wormholes, Universe7(2021) 464 [2106.03964]

    arXiv 2021

  39. [39]

    Susskind,Black Holes Hint towards De Sitter Matrix Theory,Universe9(2023) 368 [2109.01322]

    L. Susskind,Black Holes Hint towards De Sitter Matrix Theory,Universe9(2023) 368 [2109.01322]

    arXiv 2023

  40. [40]

    Shaghoulian,The central dogma and cosmological horizons,JHEP01(2022) 132 [2110.13210]

    E. Shaghoulian,The central dogma and cosmological horizons,JHEP01(2022) 132 [2110.13210]

    arXiv 2022

  41. [41]

    Shaghoulian and L

    E. Shaghoulian and L. Susskind,Entanglement in De Sitter space,JHEP08(2022) 198 [2201.03603]

    arXiv 2022

  42. [42]

    Chandrasekaran, R

    V. Chandrasekaran, R. Longo, G. Penington and E. Witten,An algebra of observables for de Sitter space,JHEP02(2023) 082 [2206.10780]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  43. [43]

    Witten,Algebras, regions, and observers.,Proc

    E. Witten,Algebras, regions, and observers.,Proc. Symp. Pure Math.107(2024) 247 [2303.02837]

    arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    Araujo-Regado, R

    G. Araujo-Regado, R. Khan and A.C. Wall,Cauchy slice holography: a new AdS/CFT dictionary,JHEP03(2023) 026 [2204.00591]

    arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    Araujo-Regado,Holographic Cosmology on Closed Slices in 2+1 Dimensions, 2212.03219

    G. Araujo-Regado,Holographic Cosmology on Closed Slices in 2+1 Dimensions, 2212.03219

    arXiv

  46. [46]

    Hikida, T

    Y. Hikida, T. Nishioka, T. Takayanagi and Y. Taki,CFT duals of three-dimensional de Sitter gravity,JHEP05(2022) 129 [2203.02852]

    arXiv 2022

  47. [47]

    K. Doi, J. Harper, A. Mollabashi, T. Takayanagi and Y. Taki,Pseudoentropy in dS/CFT and Timelike Entanglement Entropy,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 031601 [2210.09457]

    arXiv 2023

  48. [48]

    Baiguera, V

    S. Baiguera, V. Balasubramanian, P. Caputa, S. Chapman, J. Haferkamp, M.P. Heller et al.,Quantum complexity in gravity, quantum field theory, and quantum information science,Phys. Rept.1159(2026) 1 [2503.10753]

    arXiv 2026

  49. [49]

    Ryu and T

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi,Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006) 181602 [hep-th/0603001]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  50. [50]

    Ryu and T

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi,Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy,JHEP08(2006) 045 [hep-th/0605073]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  51. [51]

    Hubeny, M

    V.E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi,A Covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal,JHEP07(2007) 062 [0705.0016]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  52. [52]

    Faulkner, M

    T. Faulkner, M. Guica, T. Hartman, R.C. Myers and M. Van Raamsdonk,Gravitation from Entanglement in Holographic CFTs,JHEP03(2014) 051 [1312.7856]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  53. [53]

    Dong,Holographic Entanglement Entropy for General Higher Derivative Gravity,JHEP 01(2014) 044 [1310.5713]

    X. Dong,Holographic Entanglement Entropy for General Higher Derivative Gravity,JHEP 01(2014) 044 [1310.5713]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  54. [54]

    Susskind,Entanglement is not enough,Fortsch

    L. Susskind,Entanglement is not enough,Fortsch. Phys.64(2016) 49 [1411.0690]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  55. [55]

    Nielsen,A geometric approach to quantum circuit lower bounds,Quant

    M.A. Nielsen,A geometric approach to quantum circuit lower bounds,Quant. Inf. Comput. 6(2006) 213 [quant-ph/0502070]. – 36 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  56. [56]

    Nielsen and Isaac L

    M.A. Nielsen and I.L. Chuang,Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, Cambridge University Press (6, 2012), 10.1017/cbo9780511976667

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511976667 2012

  57. [57]

    Chapman and G

    S. Chapman and G. Policastro,Quantum computational complexity from quantum information to black holes and back,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 128 [2110.14672]

    arXiv 2022

  58. [58]

    Jefferson and R.C

    R. Jefferson and R.C. Myers,Circuit complexity in quantum field theory,JHEP10(2017) 107 [1707.08570]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  59. [59]

    Chapman, M.P

    S. Chapman, M.P. Heller, H. Marrochio and F. Pastawski,Toward a Definition of Complexity for Quantum Field Theory States,Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018) 121602 [1707.08582]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  60. [60]

    Finkel, H

    M. Finkel, H. Thierschmann, A.J. Katan, M.P. Westig, M. Spirito and T.M. Klapwijk, Shielded cantilever with on-chip interferometer circuit for THz scanning probe impedance microscopy,Rev. Sci. Instrum.90(2019) 113701 [1906.11810]

    arXiv 2019

  61. [61]

    Stanford and L

    D. Stanford and L. Susskind,Complexity and Shock Wave Geometries,Phys. Rev. D90 (2014) 126007 [1406.2678]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  62. [62]

    Susskind,Computational Complexity and Black Hole Horizons,Fortsch

    L. Susskind,Computational Complexity and Black Hole Horizons,Fortsch. Phys.64(2016) 24 [1403.5695]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  63. [63]

    Brown, D.A

    A.R. Brown, D.A. Roberts, L. Susskind, B. Swingle and Y. Zhao,Holographic Complexity Equals Bulk Action?,Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) 191301 [1509.07876]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  64. [64]

    Brown, D.A

    A.R. Brown, D.A. Roberts, L. Susskind, B. Swingle and Y. Zhao,Complexity, action, and black holes,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 086006 [1512.04993]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  65. [65]

    Couch, W

    J. Couch, W. Fischler and P.H. Nguyen,Noether charge, black hole volume, and complexity, JHEP03(2017) 119 [1610.02038]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  66. [66]

    Belin, R.C

    A. Belin, R.C. Myers, S.-M. Ruan, G. Sárosi and A.J. Speranza,Does Complexity Equal Anything?,Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) 081602 [2111.02429]

    arXiv 2022

  67. [67]

    Belin, R.C

    A. Belin, R.C. Myers, S.-M. Ruan, G. Sárosi and A.J. Speranza,Complexity equals anything II,JHEP01(2023) 154 [2210.09647]

    arXiv 2023

  68. [68]

    Jørstad, R.C

    E. Jørstad, R.C. Myers and S.-M. Ruan,Complexity=anything: singularity probes,JHEP 07(2023) 223 [2304.05453]

    arXiv 2023

  69. [69]

    Cai, S.-M

    R.-G. Cai, S.-M. Ruan, S.-J. Wang, R.-Q. Yang and R.-H. Peng,Action growth for AdS black holes,JHEP09(2016) 161 [1606.08307]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  70. [70]

    Hernandez, R.C

    J. Hernandez, R.C. Myers and S.-M. Ruan,Quantum extremal islands made easy. Part III. Complexity on the brane,JHEP02(2021) 173 [2010.16398]

    arXiv 2021

  71. [71]

    Swingle and Y

    B. Swingle and Y. Wang,Holographic Complexity of Einstein-Maxwell-Dilaton Gravity, JHEP09(2018) 106 [1712.09826]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  72. [72]

    Jiang and H

    J. Jiang and H. Zhang,Surface term, corner term, and action growth inF(Rabcd)gravity theory,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 086005 [1806.10312]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  73. [73]

    Brown, H

    A.R. Brown, H. Gharibyan, H.W. Lin, L. Susskind, L. Thorlacius and Y. Zhao,Complexity of Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 046016 [1810.08741]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  74. [74]

    Bernamonti, F

    A. Bernamonti, F. Galli, J. Hernandez, R.C. Myers, S.-M. Ruan and J. Simón,First Law of Holographic Complexity,Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 081601 [1903.04511]. – 37 –

    arXiv 2019

  75. [75]

    Zhang, C

    M. Zhang, C. Fang and J. Jiang,Holographic complexity of rotating black holes with conical deficits,Phys. Lett. B838(2023) 137691 [2212.05902]

    arXiv 2023

  76. [76]

    R.-G. Cai, M. Sasaki and S.-J. Wang,Action growth of charged black holes with a single horizon,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 124002 [1702.06766]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  77. [77]

    Jiang, M.-T

    H.-Y. Jiang, M.-T. Wang and Y.-X. Liua,Holographic complexity and phase transition for AdS black holes,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 046013 [2307.09223]

    arXiv 2024

  78. [78]

    Qu, H.-Y

    L.-C. Qu, H.-Y. Jiang and Y.-X. Liu,Chaos and multifold complexity for an inverted harmonic oscillator,JHEP12(2022) 065 [2211.04317]

    arXiv 2022

  79. [79]

    Reynolds and S.F

    A.P. Reynolds and S.F. Ross,Complexity of the AdS Soliton,Class. Quant. Grav.35(2018) 095006 [1712.03732]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  80. [80]

    Al Balushi, R.A

    A. Al Balushi, R.A. Hennigar, H.K. Kunduri and R.B. Mann,Holographic Complexity and Thermodynamic Volume,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 101601 [2008.09138]

    arXiv 2021

Showing first 80 references.