Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

A GBZ transformation yields a quasi-reciprocal Hamiltonian whose periodic-boundary physics matches the open-boundary behavior of an interacting non-Hermitian model.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-28 08:34 UTC pith:IHRP2ZFF

load-bearing objection The paper gives a workable numerical route for many-body non-Hermitian systems via a GBZ-transformed quasi-reciprocal model, but the central mapping is asserted without the direct spectral comparisons needed to confirm it survives interactions. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2606.03124 v1 pith:IHRP2ZFF submitted 2026-06-02 cond-mat.str-el

Many-Body Non-Hermitian Physics in the Generalized Brillouin Zone

Chaoze Lu , Chuanshu Xu , Zhenghao Yang , Xiancong Lu This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords non-Hermitian systemsgeneralized Brillouin zonemany-body interactionsentanglement spectrumtopological phasesopen boundary conditionsperiodic boundary conditionsquasi-reciprocal Hamiltonian
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper extends the generalized Brillouin zone framework to many-body interacting non-Hermitian systems that have a circular GBZ. It constructs a quasi-reciprocal many-body Hamiltonian via the GBZ transformation; when this new Hamiltonian is studied with periodic boundary conditions, its properties reproduce those of the original non-Hermitian model with open boundaries. Exact diagonalization on the transformed model produces the phase diagram through the Zak phase and charge-density-wave structure factor. The degeneracy structure of the low-lying entanglement spectrum distinguishes the phases and thereby encodes the topological information of the original system.

Core claim

Based on a GBZ transformation, a quasi-reciprocal many-body Hamiltonian can be constructed which, under periodic boundary conditions, captures the physics of the original non-Hermitian model under open boundary conditions. The topological properties in the interacting non-Hermitian system are encoded in the entanglement spectrum of the quasi-reciprocal model.

What carries the argument

The GBZ transformation that converts the non-Hermitian model into a quasi-reciprocal many-body Hamiltonian studied under periodic boundaries.

Load-bearing premise

The generalized Brillouin zone transformation developed for non-interacting systems applies unchanged to interacting many-body models when the GBZ remains circular.

What would settle it

Direct numerical comparison in which the energy levels, correlation functions, or entanglement spectrum of the quasi-reciprocal periodic Hamiltonian fail to match the open-boundary spectrum of the original non-Hermitian model at the same parameters.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The phase diagram is obtained by computing the Zak phase and the charge-density-wave structure factor via exact diagonalization under periodic boundaries.
  • Degeneracy of the low-lying entanglement spectrum labels each phase in the diagram.
  • Topological properties of the interacting non-Hermitian system become accessible through standard periodic-boundary calculations on the transformed Hamiltonian.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same mapping may extend to other interacting non-Hermitian models provided their GBZ is circular.
  • Models with non-circular GBZs would require checking whether additional corrections are needed.
  • The approach supplies a concrete route for computing many-body invariants without explicit open-boundary simulations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that for an interacting non-Hermitian model with circular GBZ, a GBZ transformation can be used to construct a quasi-reciprocal many-body Hamiltonian. Under PBC this Hamiltonian reproduces the OBC physics (including spectrum and eigenstates) of the original non-Hermitian interacting system. Exact diagonalization on the quasi-reciprocal model is used to obtain a phase diagram from the Zak phase and CDW structure factor; the degeneracy pattern of the low-lying entanglement spectrum is shown to label each phase.

Significance. If the mapping holds without interaction-dependent corrections, the construction supplies a concrete route to many-body non-Hermitian physics that re-uses standard PBC numerics and entanglement diagnostics. The numerical extraction of Zak phase, CDW order, and entanglement spectrum on the transformed model is a tangible contribution that could be extended to other circular-GBZ models.

major comments (2)
  1. [GBZ transformation and construction of the quasi-reciprocal Hamiltonian] The central mapping asserts that the single-particle GBZ similarity transformation extends unmodified to the interacting regime. No derivation or explicit check is supplied to exclude interaction-induced renormalization of the GBZ radius or effective non-reciprocity; the construction therefore rests on an untested assumption that is load-bearing for the claim that the quasi-reciprocal PBC Hamiltonian captures the original OBC physics.
  2. [Numerical results and phase diagram] ED results (Zak phase, CDW structure factor, entanglement spectrum) are reported exclusively for the quasi-reciprocal model. No side-by-side comparison of low-lying eigenvalues, order parameters, or eigenstate overlaps between the original non-Hermitian OBC system and the transformed PBC system on identical finite-size lattices is presented, leaving the mapping unvalidated.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Model definition] The model Hamiltonian (hopping amplitudes, interaction strength, non-reciprocity parameter) should be written explicitly in the main text rather than referenced only by name.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions for the phase diagram and entanglement spectra should state the system sizes used and the precise definition of the entanglement cut.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address the two major points below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the derivation of the mapping and provide direct numerical validation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [GBZ transformation and construction of the quasi-reciprocal Hamiltonian] The central mapping asserts that the single-particle GBZ similarity transformation extends unmodified to the interacting regime. No derivation or explicit check is supplied to exclude interaction-induced renormalization of the GBZ radius or effective non-reciprocity; the construction therefore rests on an untested assumption that is load-bearing for the claim that the quasi-reciprocal PBC Hamiltonian captures the original OBC physics.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit derivation is required. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection deriving the many-body quasi-reciprocal Hamiltonian. For the circular-GBZ class the similarity transformation is a uniform rescaling of all hoppings that commutes with density-density interactions; consequently the GBZ radius remains interaction-independent and no renormalization of non-reciprocity appears. This property follows directly from the single-particle GBZ equation being unchanged by the interaction term. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Numerical results and phase diagram] ED results (Zak phase, CDW structure factor, entanglement spectrum) are reported exclusively for the quasi-reciprocal model. No side-by-side comparison of low-lying eigenvalues, order parameters, or eigenstate overlaps between the original non-Hermitian OBC system and the transformed PBC system on identical finite-size lattices is presented, leaving the mapping unvalidated.

    Authors: We accept that direct validation is necessary. In the revision we will include finite-size benchmarks (L=4 and L=6) comparing the original non-Hermitian OBC spectrum, CDW structure factor, and eigenstate overlaps with the corresponding quantities of the quasi-reciprocal PBC Hamiltonian. These comparisons will be added as a new figure and accompanying text. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on external GBZ extension and direct ED

full rationale

The central construction applies the known single-particle GBZ transformation (cited as prior non-interacting work) to define a quasi-reciprocal many-body Hamiltonian, then computes its phase diagram, Zak phase, CDW structure factor, and entanglement spectrum via exact diagonalization on that Hamiltonian. No equation reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted input by construction, no load-bearing uniqueness theorem is imported from the same authors, and the mapping is not self-definitional. The reported results are therefore independent numerical outputs on the transformed model rather than tautological restatements of inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 1 invented entities

Central claim rests on the validity of extending the GBZ transformation to interacting systems and on the numerical diagnostics being faithful reporters of the phases; no explicit free parameters are introduced in the abstract, but the specific interacting model itself is an unstated choice.

axioms (3)
  • standard math Exact diagonalization yields exact eigenstates and eigenvalues for finite-size systems.
    Invoked when the phase diagram is obtained via ED.
  • domain assumption Zak phase and CDW structure factor remain valid order parameters after the GBZ transformation.
    Used to label phases in the transformed model.
  • domain assumption Degeneracy pattern in the low-lying entanglement spectrum distinguishes topological phases.
    Standard diagnostic applied to the quasi-reciprocal Hamiltonian.
invented entities (1)
  • quasi-reciprocal many-body Hamiltonian no independent evidence
    purpose: Hamiltonian obtained via GBZ transformation whose PBC spectrum reproduces the original non-Hermitian OBC physics.
    New object introduced to bypass direct treatment of non-Hermitian many-body systems; no independent falsifiable prediction supplied in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5783 in / 1579 out tokens · 25327 ms · 2026-06-28T08:34:33.670982+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The breakdown of conventional bulk-boundary correspondence (BBC) in non-Hermitian system can be resolved by the generalized Brillouin zone (GBZ) theory. However, extending the GBZ theory to interacting many-body systems remains an open problem. Here, we consider an interacting non-Hermitian model characterized by a circular GBZ. We show that, based on a GBZ transformation, a quasi-reciprocal many-body Hamiltonian can be constructed which, under periodic boundary conditions (PBC), captures the physics of the original non-Hermitian model under open boundary conditions (OBC). Using exact diagonalization (ED), we determine the phase diagram for the quasi-reciprocal many-body Hamiltonian by computing the Zak phase and the structure factor of the charge-density-wave (CDW) phase. We further investigate the entanglement properties and find that the degeneracy of the low-lying entanglement spectrum characterizes each phase in the phase diagram. These findings demonstrate that the topological properties in interacting non-Hermitian system is encoded in the entanglement spectrum of the quasi-reciprocal model. Our work establishes a route to studying many-body non-Hermitian physics within the GBZ formalism.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.03124 by Chaoze Lu, Chuanshu Xu, Xiancong Lu, Zhenghao Yang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic diagram of the non-Hermitian interacting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Phase diagram of the quasi-reciprocal SSH model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Degeneracy structure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Enhancement of charge correlations and real-space topological marker on an interacting non-Hermitian Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    In the interacting non-Hermitian SSH model the real-space topological marker remains robust while non-Hermiticity amplifies staggered charge correlations near exceptional points under open boundary conditions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Ashida, Z

    Y. Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, Advances in Physics 69, 249 (2020)

    2020

  2. [2]

    E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, and F. K. Kunst, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 015005 (2021)

    2021

  3. [3]

    Zhang, T

    X. Zhang, T. Zhang, M.-H. Lu, and Y.-F. Chen, Advances in Physics: X7, 2109431 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1080/23746149.2022.2109431

    work page doi:10.1080/23746149.2022.2109431 2022

  4. [4]

    Okuma and M

    N. Okuma and M. Sato, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics14, 83 (2023)

    2023

  5. [5]

    K. Yang, Z. Li, J. L. K. K¨ onig, L. Rødland, M. St˚ alhammar, and E. J. Bergholtz, Reports on Progress in Physics87, 078002 (2024)

    2024

  6. [6]

    J. T. Gohsrich, A. Banerjee, and F. K. Kunst, Euro- physics Letters150, 60001 (2025)

    2025

  7. [8]

    S. Yao, F. Song, and Z. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 136802 (2018)

    2018

  8. [9]

    F. K. Kunst, E. Edvardsson, J. C. Budich, and E. J. Bergholtz, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 026808 (2018)

    2018

  9. [10]

    Z. Gong, Y. Ashida, K. Kawabata, K. Takasan, S. Hi- gashikawa, and M. Ueda, Phys. Rev. X8, 031079 (2018)

    2018

  10. [11]

    C. H. Lee and R. Thomale, Phys. Rev. B99, 201103 (2019)

    2019

  11. [12]

    Okuma, K

    N. Okuma, K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, and M. Sato, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 086801 (2020)

    2020

  12. [13]

    T. E. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 133903 (2016)

    2016

  13. [14]

    Xiong, Journal of Physics Communications2, 035043 (2018)

    Y. Xiong, Journal of Physics Communications2, 035043 (2018)

    2018

  14. [15]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 3045 (2010)

    2010

  15. [16]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1057 (2011)

    2011

  16. [18]

    Z. Yang, K. Zhang, C. Fang, and J. Hu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 226402 (2020)

    2020

  17. [19]

    Zhang, Z

    K. Zhang, Z. Yang, and C. Fang, Nature Communica- tions13, 2496 (2022)

    2022

  18. [20]

    Jiang and C

    H. Jiang and C. H. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 076401 (2023)

    2023

  19. [21]

    H.-Y. Wang, F. Song, and Z. Wang, Phys. Rev. X14, 021011 (2024)

    2024

  20. [22]

    Hu, Science Bulletin70, 51 (2025)

    H. Hu, Science Bulletin70, 51 (2025)

    2025

  21. [23]

    S. Mu, C. H. Lee, L. Li, and J. Gong, Phys. Rev. B102, 081115 (2020)

    2020

  22. [24]

    Zhang, Y.-L

    D.-W. Zhang, Y.-L. Chen, G.-Q. Zhang, L.-J. Lang, Z. Li, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. B101, 235150 (2020)

    2020

  23. [25]

    Xu and S

    Z. Xu and S. Chen, Phys. Rev. B102, 035153 (2020)

    2020

  24. [26]

    T. Liu, J. J. He, T. Yoshida, Z.-L. Xiang, and F. Nori, Phys. Rev. B102, 235151 (2020)

    2020

  25. [27]

    Zhang, M

    S.-B. Zhang, M. M. Denner, T. c. v. Bzduˇ sek, M. A. Sentef, and T. Neupert, Phys. Rev. B106, L121102 (2022)

    2022

  26. [28]

    Kawabata, K

    K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, and S. Ryu, Phys. Rev. B 105, 165137 (2022)

    2022

  27. [29]

    Lu and G

    C.-Z. Lu and G. Sun, Phys. Rev. A109, 042208 (2024)

    2024

  28. [30]

    Qin and L

    Y. Qin and L. Li, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 096501 (2024)

    2024

  29. [31]

    Shimomura and M

    K. Shimomura and M. Sato, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 136502 (2024)

    2024

  30. [32]

    R. Shen, F. Qin, J.-Y. Desaules, Z. Papi´ c, and C. H. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 216601 (2024)

    2024

  31. [33]

    Wang and L

    Y.-A. Wang and L. Li, Chinese Physics Letters42, 037301 (2025)

    2025

  32. [35]

    Alsallom, L

    F. Alsallom, L. Herviou, O. V. Yazyev, and M. Brzezi´ nska, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 033122 (2022)

    2022

  33. [36]

    Gliozzi, G

    J. Gliozzi, G. De Tomasi, and T. L. Hughes, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 136503 (2024)

    2024

  34. [37]

    Hamanaka and K

    S. Hamanaka and K. Kawabata, Phys. Rev. B111, 035144 (2025)

    2025

  35. [39]

    Non-bloch self-energy of dissipative interacting fermions,

    H.-R. Wang, Z. Wang, and Z. Wang, “Non-bloch self-energy of dissipative interacting fermions,” (2024), arXiv:2411.13661 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  36. [40]

    Amico, R

    L. Amico, R. Fazio, A. Osterloh, and V. Vedral, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 517 (2008)

    2008

  37. [41]

    Eisert, M

    J. Eisert, M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 277 (2010)

    2010

  38. [44]

    E. Lee, H. Lee, and B.-J. Yang, Phys. Rev. B101, 121109 (2020)

    2020

  39. [45]

    L.-M. Chen, S. A. Chen, and P. Ye, SciPost Phys.11, 3 (2021)

    2021

  40. [46]

    Okuma and M

    N. Okuma and M. Sato, Phys. Rev. B103, 085428 (2021)

    2021

  41. [47]

    B´ acsi and B

    A. B´ acsi and B. D´ ora, Phys. Rev. B103, 085137 (2021)

    2021

  42. [48]

    Modak and B

    R. Modak and B. P. Mandal, Phys. Rev. A103, 062416 (2021)

    2021

  43. [50]

    W. Chen, L. Peng, H. Lu, and X. Lu, Phys. Rev. B105, 075126 (2022)

    2022

  44. [51]

    C. H. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 010402 (2022)

    2022

  45. [52]

    Tu, Y.-C

    Y.-T. Tu, Y.-C. Tzeng, and P.-Y. Chang, SciPost Phys. 12, 194 (2022)

    2022

  46. [53]

    L.-M. Chen, Y. Zhou, S. A. Chen, and P. Ye, Phys. Rev. B105, L121115 (2022)

    2022

  47. [54]

    Fossati, F

    M. Fossati, F. Ares, and P. Calabrese, Phys. Rev. B107, 205153 (2023)

    2023

  48. [55]

    Kawabata, T

    K. Kawabata, T. Numasawa, and S. Ryu, Phys. Rev. X 13, 021007 (2023)

    2023

  49. [56]

    X. Feng, S. Liu, S. Chen, and W. Guo, Phys. Rev. B 107, 094309 (2023)

    2023

  50. [57]

    Excep- tional entanglement in non-hermitian fermionic models,

    W.-Z. Yi, Y.-J. Hai, R. Xiao, and W.-Q. Chen, “Excep- tional entanglement in non-hermitian fermionic models,” (2023), arXiv:2304.08609 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  51. [58]

    Negative su- perinflating bipartite fluctuations near exceptional points inPT-symmetric models,

    W. Pan, X. Wang, H. Lin, and S. Hu, “Negative su- perinflating bipartite fluctuations near exceptional points inPT-symmetric models,” (2023), arXiv:2304.10368 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2023

  52. [59]

    Hsieh and P.-Y

    C.-T. Hsieh and P.-Y. Chang, SciPost Phys. Core6, 062 (2023)

    2023

  53. [60]

    Orito and K.-I

    T. Orito and K.-I. Imura, Phys. Rev. B108, 214308 6 (2023)

    2023

  54. [61]

    Y. L. Gal, X. Turkeshi, and M. Schir` o, SciPost Phys. 14, 138 (2023)

    2023

  55. [62]

    Li, X.-J

    S.-Z. Li, X.-J. Yu, and Z. Li, Phys. Rev. B109, 024306 (2024)

    2024

  56. [63]

    Zhou, Phys

    L. Zhou, Phys. Rev. B109, 024204 (2024)

    2024

  57. [64]

    Z.-C. Liu, K. Li, and Y. Xu, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 090401 (2024)

    2024

  58. [65]

    Y.-P. Wang, C. Fang, and J. Ren, Phys. Rev. B110, 035113 (2024)

    2024

  59. [66]

    L.-M. Chen, Y. Zhou, S. A. Chen, and P. Ye, Chinese Physics Letters41, 127302 (2024)

    2024

  60. [67]

    Li and F

    H. Li and F. D. M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 010504 (2008)

    2008

  61. [68]

    Sayyad, J

    S. Sayyad, J. Yu, A. G. Grushin, and L. M. Sieberer, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 033022 (2021)

    2021

  62. [69]

    Ortega-Taberner, L

    C. Ortega-Taberner, L. Rødland, and M. Hermanns, Phys. Rev. B105, 075103 (2022)

    2022

  63. [70]

    Bayona-Pena, R

    P. Bayona-Pena, R. Hanai, T. Mori, and H. Hayakawa, Phys. Rev. B111, L140303 (2025)

    2025

  64. [71]

    Lieu, Phys

    S. Lieu, Phys. Rev. B97, 045106 (2018)

    2018

  65. [73]

    Templates for the solution of al- gebraic eigenvalue problems: A practical guide,

    Z. Bai, J. Demmel, J. Dongarra, A. Ruhe, and H. van der Vorst, eds., “Templates for the solution of al- gebraic eigenvalue problems: A practical guide,” (SIAM, Philadelphia, 2000) Chap. 7, pp. 149–231

    2000

  66. [76]

    W. C. Yu, Y. C. Li, P. D. Sacramento, and H.-Q. Lin, Phys. Rev. B94, 245123 (2016)

    2016

  67. [77]

    X.-J. Yu, S. Yang, H.-Q. Lin, and S.-K. Jian, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 026601 (2024)

    2024

  68. [78]

    Ye, L.-Z

    B.-T. Ye, L.-Z. Mu, and H. Fan, Phys. Rev. B94, 165167 (2016)

    2016

  69. [79]

    arti- ficial

    C. H. Lee, L. Li, R. Thomale, and J. Gong, Phys. Rev. B102, 085151 (2020). Supplemental Material for: Many-body non-Hermitian Physics in the Generalized Brillouin Zone Chaoze Lu, 1 Chuanshu Xu, 1 Zhenghao Yang, 1 and Xiancong Lu 1,∗ 1Department of Physics, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China I. QUASI-RECIPROCAL HAMIL TONIAN A. Similarity T ransformati...

    2020

  70. [80]

    Yao and Z

    S. Yao and Z. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 086803 (2018)

    2018

  71. [81]

    Yokomizo and S

    K. Yokomizo and S. Murakami, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 066404 (2019)

    2019

  72. [82]

    Chang, J.-S

    P.-Y. Chang, J.-S. You, X. Wen, and S. Ryu, Phys. Rev. Research2, 033069 (2020)

    2020

  73. [83]

    Herviou, N

    L. Herviou, N. Regnault, and J. H. Bardarson, SciPost Physics7, 069 (2019)

    2019

  74. [84]

    Guo, Y.-C

    Y.-B. Guo, Y.-C. Yu, R.-Z. Huang, L.-P. Yang, R.-Z. Chi, H.-J. Liao, and T. Xiang, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter33, 475502 (2021)

    2021

  75. [85]

    Z. Yang, C. Lu, and X. Lu, Phys. Rev. B110, 235127 (2024)

    2024

  76. [86]

    C. H. Lee, L. Li, R. Thomale, and J. Gong, Phys. Rev. B102, 085151 (2020)

    2020

  77. [87]

    Zhou, J.-S

    X. Zhou, J.-S. Pan, and S. Jia, Phys. Rev. B107, 054105 (2023)

    2023

  78. [88]

    Zhong, W

    P. Zhong, W. Pan, H. Lin, X. Wang, and S. Hu, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 106502 (2025)

    2025

  79. [89]

    Sirker, M

    J. Sirker, M. Maiti, N. P. Konstantinidis, and N. Sedl- mayr, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Ex- periment2014, P10032 (2014)

    2014

  80. [90]

    P. B. Melo, S. a. A. S. J´ unior, W. Chen, R. Mondaini, and T. Paiva, Phys. Rev. B108, 195151 (2023)

    2023

Showing first 80 references.