pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.03919 · v1 · pith:FWEUT6FXnew · submitted 2026-06-02 · 💻 cs.SI · cs.CY· cs.DL· cs.LG· physics.soc-ph

Forecasting Conceptual Diffusion in Science: The Case of Quantum Computing

Thomas Maillart , Thibaut Chataing , David Dosu , Paul Bagourd , Julian Jang-Jaccard , Alain Mermoud This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 07:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.SI cs.CYcs.DLcs.LGphysics.soc-ph
keywords conceptual diffusionexogenous diffusionquantum computingcitation networksscientometricsdiffusion entropymachine learning predictionOpenAlex
0
0 comments X

The pith

Exogenous diffusion of scientific concepts is predictable from upstream heterogeneity, citation breadth, and distributional dispersion in co-occurrence networks, while endogenous reinforcement is largely not.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds a temporally resolved concept co-occurrence network from the quantum computing subtree in OpenAlex and tracks each concept pair through its upstream citation lineage and downstream diffusion. LightGBM models trained on distributional and diversity-aware features are used to predict endogenous reinforcement, exogenous diffusion, their ratio, and diffusion entropy, after controlling for overall publication growth. Endogenous reinforcement proves largely unpredictable in the primary benchmark, whereas exogenous diffusion and entropy reach R² values up to 0.78 and are driven by upstream heterogeneity, citation breadth, and dispersion according to SHAP analyses. Replications across robotics, advanced materials, and neuro implants confirm exogenous diffusion as the top-ranked predictable target, though endogenous predictability varies by field. Case studies link entropy increases to new conceptual frontiers and collapses to convergence or displacement, indicating stable structural regularities govern conceptual diffusion.

Core claim

Using a temporally resolved concept co-occurrence network and citation lineages from OpenAlex, LightGBM models on distributional and diversity-aware features predict exogenous diffusion and entropy with R² up to 0.78, driven by upstream heterogeneity, citation breadth, and distributional dispersion, while endogenous reinforcement remains largely unpredictable after controlling for publication growth; replications confirm exogenous diffusion as the top target across fields with R²_test ~0.60-0.87.

What carries the argument

Temporally resolved concept co-occurrence network tracking upstream citation lineage and downstream diffusion, analyzed with LightGBM models and SHAP on distributional and diversity-aware features.

If this is right

  • Sharp entropy increases coincide with the opening of new conceptual frontiers while collapses signal technological convergence or paradigm displacement.
  • Early diversity-based signals identify cross-domain uptake of concepts.
  • The approach supplies a scalable foundation for anticipatory scientometrics, technology foresight, and innovation-oriented policy analysis.
  • Exogenous diffusion remains the most predictable target across multiple fields, though endogenous predictability can rise in some domains like neuro implants.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the features capture general mechanisms, the same pipeline could forecast diffusion in adjacent domains such as artificial intelligence or biotechnology without major redesign.
  • The observed asymmetry between endogenous and exogenous predictability may reflect deeper differences in how concepts consolidate internally versus spread externally.
  • Applying the model to historical data from earlier technologies could test whether the identified signals would have allowed earlier anticipation of their trajectories.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen distributional and diversity-aware features extracted from the temporally resolved co-occurrence network and citation lineages are sufficient to capture the structural drivers of exogenous diffusion without substantial omitted-variable bias or post-hoc selection effects.

What would settle it

A replication in which exogenous diffusion R² falls below 0.5 after removing heterogeneity and dispersion features from the quantum computing model, or when the trained model is applied without retraining to a previously untested scientific field.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.03919 by Alain Mermoud, David Dosu, Julian Jang-Jaccard, Paul Bagourd, Thibaut Chataing, Thomas Maillart.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: SHAP summary plots for A. Endo/Exogenous Ratio, B. Exogenous Count, and C. Entropy. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Test 𝑅 2 by regression target across four validation domains. Three patterns recur across domains (all on unnormalised counts). First, exogenous count remains the most reliably predictable target in every field (𝑅 2 test ≈ 0.60–0.87), reinforcing the claim that cross-pair recombination in citing papers is structurally organised. Second, endo count is modestly below exo in quantum computing and robotics on … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Entropy Distribution and Temporal Transition Patterns. A. Empirical entropy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Understanding and anticipating scientific change requires models that distinguish between endogenous consolidation and exogenous diffusion of scientific concepts. Using the quantum computing subtree of concepts in OpenAlex, we construct a temporally resolved concept co-occurrence network and track each concept pair through its upstream citation lineage and downstream diffusion. We train LightGBM models on distributional and diversity-aware features to predict four outcomes: endogenous reinforcement, exogenous diffusion, their ratio, and diffusion entropy. After controlling for overall publication growth of the scientific body, endogenous reinforcement proves largely unpredictable in the primary quantum-computing benchmark. In contrast, exogenous diffusion and entropy are strongly predictable ($R^2$ up to $0.78\`a) and are driven by upstream heterogeneity, citation breadth, and distributional dispersion, as shown by SHAP analyses; replications on robotics, advanced materials, and neuro implants confirm that exogenous diffusion remains the top-ranked target across fields ($R^2_test \sim 0.60-0.87$), while endogenous predictability rises markedly in neuro implants (R^2_test = 0.83), indicating that the quantum-computing asymmetry does not generalise uniformly. Case studies reveal that sharp entropy increases coincide with the opening of new conceptual frontiers, while entropy collapses signal technological convergence or paradigm displacement. These results demonstrate that conceptual diffusion is governed by stable structural regularities embedded in semantic and citation environments. By identifying early diversity-based signals of cross-domain uptake, the approach provides a scalable foundation for anticipatory scientometrics, technology foresight, and innovation-oriented policy analysis in rapidly evolving research fields.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that LightGBM models trained on distributional and diversity-aware features extracted from a temporally resolved concept co-occurrence network (and citation lineages) in the quantum computing subtree of OpenAlex can predict exogenous diffusion and diffusion entropy with R² up to 0.78, driven by upstream heterogeneity, citation breadth, and distributional dispersion (per SHAP), while endogenous reinforcement remains largely unpredictable after controlling for overall publication growth. Replications in robotics, advanced materials, and neuro implants confirm exogenous diffusion as the top-ranked target (R²_test ~0.60-0.87), with some field variation; case studies link entropy shifts to frontier opening or convergence. The work positions this as evidence of stable structural regularities enabling anticipatory scientometrics.

Significance. If the central asymmetry and feature-based predictability hold after rigorous validation, the results would provide a concrete, replicable framework for distinguishing endogenous consolidation from exogenous diffusion and for generating early, diversity-based forecasts of cross-domain concept uptake. The multi-field replications and entropy case studies add value for technology foresight and policy applications in fast-moving domains.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods] Methods (model training and feature construction): The manuscript reports specific R² values for exogenous diffusion (up to 0.78) and the endogenous-exogenous asymmetry but supplies no information on the temporal train-test split procedure, cross-validation strategy, exact number of features, whether feature selection or engineering was performed iteratively on validation performance, or the precise functional form of the publication-growth control (single covariate vs. normalization). These details are load-bearing for the claim that the reported predictability reflects stable structural drivers rather than leakage or post-hoc selection.
  2. [Results] Results (SHAP and target definitions): Features are derived from the same citation and co-occurrence data used to define the targets (exogenous diffusion, entropy). Without an explicit demonstration that distributional dispersion does not directly influence both feature construction and the diffusion-entropy outcome, the SHAP-identified drivers and the asymmetry between endogenous and exogenous predictability risk circularity.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The notation "$R^2$ up to 0.78`a)" contains a typographical artifact that should be corrected for clarity.
  2. The paper should include a table listing the exact feature set, their definitions, and any preprocessing steps to improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback, which highlights important aspects of methodological transparency and potential circularity. We address each major comment below and commit to revisions that strengthen the paper without altering its core claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods] Methods (model training and feature construction): The manuscript reports specific R² values for exogenous diffusion (up to 0.78) and the endogenous-exogenous asymmetry but supplies no information on the temporal train-test split procedure, cross-validation strategy, exact number of features, whether feature selection or engineering was performed iteratively on validation performance, or the precise functional form of the publication-growth control (single covariate vs. normalization). These details are load-bearing for the claim that the reported predictability reflects stable structural drivers rather than leakage or post-hoc selection.

    Authors: We agree that these details are essential for reproducibility and to substantiate the absence of leakage. The submitted manuscript's Methods section provides a high-level overview but lacks the requested granularity. In the revision we will expand this section to specify: a forward-chaining temporal split (training on data through year t and testing on t+1 onward, with explicit year ranges), time-series cross-validation (5 folds), the full feature count and list (approximately 40 features covering citation breadth, co-occurrence dispersion, and diversity metrics), the iterative feature engineering process (guided by validation R² without test-set leakage), and the growth control as a single covariate (log of annual field-wide publication volume included in the model). These additions will directly support the structural-regularities interpretation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results (SHAP and target definitions): Features are derived from the same citation and co-occurrence data used to define the targets (exogenous diffusion, entropy). Without an explicit demonstration that distributional dispersion does not directly influence both feature construction and the diffusion-entropy outcome, the SHAP-identified drivers and the asymmetry between endogenous and exogenous predictability risk circularity.

    Authors: This concern is well-taken and merits explicit clarification. While features are constructed from the same underlying citation and co-occurrence graphs, they are computed exclusively on temporally antecedent data (upstream lineages and co-occurrences up to time t) to predict strictly future diffusion and entropy outcomes (t+k). The targets are defined on post-t diffusion events, creating a directional separation. In the revision we will add a dedicated subsection with a temporal flowchart, lagged-feature correlation checks, and a sensitivity analysis that recomputes SHAP values after removing any potentially overlapping dispersion metrics. This will demonstrate that the reported asymmetry is not an artifact of circular construction. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation uses standard ML on upstream features to predict downstream targets.

full rationale

The paper constructs features from temporally resolved co-occurrence networks and citation lineages, then trains LightGBM models to predict separate downstream quantities (endogenous reinforcement, exogenous diffusion, ratio, entropy) after controlling for publication growth. No equations or steps reduce the targets to the features by definition or construction; the asymmetry in predictability (endogenous unpredictable, exogenous R² up to 0.78) is presented as an empirical finding rather than a tautology. Replications across fields and SHAP analyses are external to any self-referential loop. This is a standard predictive modeling pipeline with no load-bearing self-citation or ansatz smuggling.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the assumption that OpenAlex concept tags and citation links faithfully represent scientific concepts and their diffusion paths; no explicit free parameters are named, but implicit ones include LightGBM hyperparameters and any thresholds used to define concept pairs or temporal bins. No new entities are postulated.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption OpenAlex concept co-occurrence and citation data accurately capture the upstream lineage and downstream diffusion of scientific ideas
    Invoked throughout the construction of the temporally resolved network and the definition of endogenous versus exogenous outcomes.
  • domain assumption Controlling for overall publication growth isolates endogenous reinforcement from exogenous diffusion effects
    Stated when reporting that endogenous reinforcement proves largely unpredictable.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5836 in / 1520 out tokens · 22104 ms · 2026-06-28T07:47:07.840404+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

193 extracted references · 125 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Automated

    Dolamic, Ljiljana and Jang-Jaccard, Julian and Mermoud, Alain and Lenders, Vincent , year =. Automated

  2. [2]

    European Commission , year =. 2030

    2030

  3. [3]

    European Commission , year =. Quantum

  4. [4]

    2020 , doi =

    Anticipatory innovation governance:. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  5. [5]

    2026 , doi =

    Quantum. 2026 , doi =

    2026

  6. [6]

    Systems Research and Behavioral Science , author =

    Complexity and the productivity of innovation , volume =. Systems Research and Behavioral Science , author =. 2010 , keywords =. doi:10.1002/sres.1057 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1002/sres.1057 2010

  7. [7]

    Bernhardt, Chris , month = mar, year =. Quantum

  8. [8]

    Journal of Informetrics , author =

    The memory of science:. Journal of Informetrics , author =. 2018 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2018.06.005 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.joi.2018.06.005 2018

  9. [9]

    Journal of data and information science , author =

    Science mapping: a systematic review of the literature , volume =. Journal of data and information science , author =

  10. [10]

    The structure of scientific revolutions , volume =

    Kuhn, Thomas S , year =. The structure of scientific revolutions , volume =

  11. [11]

    Diversity and

    Page, Scott , month = nov, year =. Diversity and. doi:10.1515/9781400835140 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1515/9781400835140

  12. [12]

    Psychological Review , author =

    Blind variation and selective retentions in creative thought as in other knowledge processes , volume =. Psychological Review , author =. 1960 , note =. doi:10.1037/h0040373 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1037/h0040373 1960

  13. [13]

    Research Policy , author =

    Scientific novelty and technological impact , volume =. Research Policy , author =. 2019 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.019 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.019 2019

  14. [14]

    Journal of The Royal Society Interface , author =

    Invention as a combinatorial process: evidence from. Journal of The Royal Society Interface , author =. 2015 , note =. doi:10.1098/rsif.2015.0272 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1098/rsif.2015.0272 2015

  15. [15]

    Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) , author =

    Visualizing. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) , author =. 2003 , note =

    2003

  16. [16]

    Atlas of

    Börner, Katy , month = sep, year =. Atlas of

  17. [17]

    Nature Communications , author =

    Surprising combinations of research contents and contexts are related to impact and emerge with scientific outsiders from distant disciplines , volume =. Nature Communications , author =. 2023 , note =. doi:10.1038/s41467-023-36741-4 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-023-36741-4 2023

  18. [18]

    Technological Forecasting and Social Change , author =

    Predicting scientific breakthroughs based on knowledge structure variations , volume =. Technological Forecasting and Social Change , author =. 2021 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120502 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120502 2021

  19. [19]

    Nature , author =

    Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology , volume =. Nature , author =. 2019 , note =. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0941-9 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0941-9 2019

  20. [20]

    Research Policy , author =

    International research collaboration:. Research Policy , author =. 2019 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.002 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.002 2019

  21. [21]

    Embedding technique and network analysis of scientific innovations emergence in an

    Brodiuk, Serhii and Palchykov, Vasyl and Holovatch, Yurij , month = aug, year =. Embedding technique and network analysis of scientific innovations emergence in an. 2020. doi:10.1109/DSMP47368.2020.9204220 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1109/dsmp47368.2020.9204220 2020

  22. [22]

    Tonn, Bruce , month = nov, year =. The. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2010.08.015 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.futures.2010.08.015 2010

  23. [23]

    Brian , month = aug, year =

    Arthur, W. Brian , month = aug, year =. The

  24. [24]

    Technological Forecasting and Social Change , author =

    Measuring security development in information technologies:. Technological Forecasting and Social Change , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122316 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122316 2023

  25. [25]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , author =

    Measuring the preferential attachment mechanism in citation networks , volume =. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , author =. 2008 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2008.03.017 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physa.2008.03.017 2008

  26. [26]

    Nature Machine Intelligence , author =

    From local explanations to global understanding with explainable. Nature Machine Intelligence , author =. 2020 , note =. doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9 2020

  27. [27]

    Lundberg, Scott M and Lee, Su-In , year =. A. Advances in

  28. [28]

    Advances in

    Ke, Guolin and Meng, Qi and Finley, Thomas and Wang, Taifeng and Chen, Wei and Ma, Weidong and Ye, Qiwei and Liu, Tie-Yan , year =. Advances in

  29. [29]

    Akiba, Takuya and Sano, Shotaro and Yanase, Toshihiko and Ohta, Takeru and Koyama, Masanori , month = jul, year =. Optuna:. Proceedings of the 25th. doi:10.1145/3292500.3330701 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1145/3292500.3330701

  30. [30]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =

    The structure of scientific collaboration networks , volume =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =. 2001 , note =. doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.404 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.404 2001

  31. [31]

    Vinod and Jolad, Shivakumar , month = nov, year =

    Enduri, Murali Krishna and Reddy, I. Vinod and Jolad, Shivakumar , month = nov, year =. Does. 2015 11th. doi:10.1109/SITIS.2015.60 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1109/sitis.2015.60 2015

  32. [32]

    The structure of scientific collaboration networks

  33. [33]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =

    Choosing experiments to accelerate collective discovery , volume =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =. 2015 , note =. doi:10.1073/pnas.1509757112 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1509757112 2015

  34. [34]

    and Osborne, Francesco and Thanapalasingam, Thiviyan and Motta, Enrico , editor =

    Salatino, Angelo A. and Osborne, Francesco and Thanapalasingam, Thiviyan and Motta, Enrico , editor =. The. Digital. 2019 , keywords =. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-30760-8_26 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-30760-8_26 2019

  35. [35]

    PeerJ Computer Science , author =

    How are topics born?. PeerJ Computer Science , author =. 2017 , note =. doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.119 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.119 2017

  36. [36]

    FUTURES & FORESIGHT SCIENCE , author =

    Horizon. FUTURES & FORESIGHT SCIENCE , author =. 2020 , note =. doi:10.1002/ffo2.23 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1002/ffo2.23 2020

  37. [37]

    Science and Public Policy , author =

    Facing the future:. Science and Public Policy , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1093/scipol/scs021 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1093/scipol/scs021 2012

  38. [38]

    The handbook of technology foresight: concepts and practice , publisher =

    Georghiou, Luke , year =. The handbook of technology foresight: concepts and practice , publisher =

  39. [39]

    Technological Forecasting and Social Change , author =

    Using scenarios for roadmapping:. Technological Forecasting and Social Change , author =. 2010 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2010.03.003 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2010.03.003 2010

  40. [40]

    Foresight:

    Cuhls, Kerstin and Dönitz, Ewa and Erdmann, Lorenz and Gransche, Bruno and Kimpeler, Simone and Schirrmeister, Elna and Warnke, Philine , year =. Foresight:. Systems and innovation research in transition:

  41. [41]

    Research Policy , author =

    Three frames for innovation policy:. Research Policy , author =. 2018 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011 2018

  42. [42]

    Systems and

    Edler, Jakob and Walz, Rainer , month = sep, year =. Systems and

  43. [43]

    Futures , author =

    Exploring the governance and implementation of sustainable development initiatives through blockchain technology , volume =. Futures , author =. 2020 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2020.102611 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.futures.2020.102611 2020

  44. [44]

    Using scenarios for roadmapping:

  45. [45]

    Engineering Proceedings , author =

    Towards. Engineering Proceedings , author =. 2022 , note =. doi:10.3390/engproc2022018017 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.3390/engproc2022018017 2022

  46. [46]

    Social Networks , author =

    Friends and neighbors on the. Social Networks , author =. 2003 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/S0378-8733(03)00009-1 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/s0378-8733(03)00009-1 2003

  47. [47]

    and Malevergne, Yannick and Sornette, Didier , month = nov, year =

    Saichev, Alexander I. and Malevergne, Yannick and Sornette, Didier , month = nov, year =. Theory of

  48. [48]

    Physical Review Letters , author =

    Empirical. Physical Review Letters , author =. 2008 , note =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.218701 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.218701 2008

  49. [49]

    , month = may, year =

    Schumpeter, Joseph A. , month = may, year =. Capitalism,

  50. [50]

    Management Science , author =

    Recombinant. Management Science , author =. 2001 , note =. doi:10.1287/mnsc.47.1.117.10671 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1287/mnsc.47.1.117.10671 2001

  51. [51]

    Science , author =

    The. Science , author =. 2007 , pmid =. doi:10.1126/science.1136099 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1136099 2007

  52. [52]

    Bradford, Anu , year =. Digital

  53. [53]

    Scientometrics , author =

    Forecasting emerging technologies using data augmentation and deep learning , volume =. Scientometrics , author =. 2020 , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03351-6 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03351-6 2020

  54. [54]

    Nature Machine Intelligence , author =

    Forecasting the future of artificial intelligence with machine learning-based link prediction in an exponentially growing knowledge network , volume =. Nature Machine Intelligence , author =. 2023 , note =. doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00735-0 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00735-0 2023

  55. [55]

    Machine Learning: Science and Technology , author =

    Forecasting high-impact research topics via machine learning on evolving knowledge graphs , volume =. Machine Learning: Science and Technology , author =. 2025 , note =. doi:10.1088/2632-2153/add6ef , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/2632-2153/add6ef 2025

  56. [56]

    Scientometrics , author =

    Mapping and comparing the technology evolution paths of scientific papers and patents: an integrated approach for forecasting technology trends , volume =. Scientometrics , author =. 2024 , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11192-024-04961-0 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1007/s11192-024-04961-0 2024

  57. [57]

    A deep learning-based method for predicting the emerging degree of research topics using emerging index , journal =

    Yang, Zhenyu and Zhang, Wenyu and Wang, Zhimin and Huang, Xiaoling , year =. A deep learning-based method for predicting the emerging degree of research topics using emerging index , journal =

  58. [58]

    Oikos , author =

    Entropy and diversity , volume =. Oikos , author =. 2006 , note =. doi:10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14714.x , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14714.x 2006

  59. [59]

    Scientometrics , author =

    Measuring destabilization and consolidation in scientific knowledge evolution , volume =. Scientometrics , author =. 2022 , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11192-022-04479-3 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1007/s11192-022-04479-3 2022

  60. [60]

    Science , author =

    Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact , volume =. Science , author =. 2016 , note =. doi:10.1126/science.aaf5239 , number =

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aaf5239 2016

  61. [61]

    Science , author =

    Atypical. Science , author =. 2013 , note =. doi:10.1126/science.1240474 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1240474 2013

  62. [62]

    https://designthinkingmeite.web.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/22337/2020/02/

    2020

  63. [63]

    Chen, Chaomei , year =

  64. [64]

    Foresight , author =

    Dynamic foresight evaluation , volume =. Foresight , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1108/14636681211210378 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1108/14636681211210378 2012

  65. [65]

    Technological Forecasting and Social Change , author =

    The origins of the concept of ‘foresight’ in science and technology:. Technological Forecasting and Social Change , author =. 2010 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2010.06.009 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2010.06.009 2010

  66. [66]

    Scientific prize network predicts who pushes the boundaries of science

  67. [67]

    Science , author =

    Metaknowledge , volume =. Science , author =. 2011 , note =. doi:10.1126/science.1201765 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1201765 2011

  68. [68]

    Reviews of Modern Physics , author =

    Machine learning and the physical sciences , volume =. Reviews of Modern Physics , author =. 2019 , note =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.91.045002 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.91.045002 2019

  69. [69]

    Reports on Progress in Physics , author =

    Machine learning & artificial intelligence in the quantum domain: a review of recent progress , volume =. Reports on Progress in Physics , author =. 2018 , note =. doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aab406 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aab406 2018

  70. [70]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =

    Predicting research trends with semantic and neural networks with an application in quantum physics , volume =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =. 2020 , note =. doi:10.1073/pnas.1914370116 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1914370116 2020

  71. [71]

    Advanced Intelligent Systems , author =

    Forecasting. Advanced Intelligent Systems , author =. doi:10.1002/aisy.202401124 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1002/aisy.202401124

  72. [72]

    International Journal of Intelligent Systems , author =

    A scientific research topic trend prediction model based on multi-. International Journal of Intelligent Systems , author =. 2022 , note =. doi:10.1002/int.22846 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1002/int.22846 2022

  73. [73]

    Technological Forecasting and Social Change , author =

    An exploration method for technology forecasting that combines link prediction with graph embedding:. Technological Forecasting and Social Change , author =. 2024 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123736 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123736 2024

  74. [74]

    Journal of Informetrics , author =

    Predicting scientific research trends based on link prediction in keyword networks , volume =. Journal of Informetrics , author =. 2020 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2020.101079 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.joi.2020.101079 2020

  75. [75]

    Ruffini, Pierre-Bruno , editor =. What. Science and. 2017 , doi =

    2017

  76. [76]

    Journal of Informetrics , author =

    Utilizing citation network structure to predict paper citation counts:. Journal of Informetrics , author =. 2022 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2021.101235 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.joi.2021.101235 2022

  77. [77]

    Journal of Informetrics , author =

    The effect of citation behaviour on knowledge diffusion and intellectual structure , volume =. Journal of Informetrics , author =. 2022 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2021.101225 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.joi.2021.101225 2022

  78. [78]

    Scientometrics , author =

    Tracking and predicting growth areas in science , volume =. Scientometrics , author =. 2006 , note =. doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0132-y , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0132-y 2006

  79. [79]

    Scientific American , author =

    The. Scientific American , author =. 1979 , note =

    1979

  80. [80]

    Scientometrics , author =

    The increasing dominance of science in the economy:. Scientometrics , author =. 2019 , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11192-019-03161-5 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1007/s11192-019-03161-5 2019

Showing first 80 references.