pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.04419 · v1 · pith:PO7MMRF5new · submitted 2026-06-03 · 📡 eess.IV · cs.AI· cs.CV· physics.med-ph

L-TGVN: Leveraging Longitudinal Priors for Personalized Rapid MRI

Arda Atal{\i}k , Sumit Chopra , Daniel K. Sodickson This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 04:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.IV cs.AIcs.CVphysics.med-ph
keywords MRI reconstructionlongitudinal priorsvariational networkundersampled imagingtrust-guided reconstructionprior-guided MRIrapid MRIpersonalized imaging
0
0 comments X

The pith

L-TGVN uses a patient's prior scans to reconstruct current MRI images from heavily undersampled data by constraining their influence to match new measurements.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces L-TGVN, a network designed to incorporate earlier scans of the same patient when recovering images from far fewer measurements than a standard scan requires. It limits the contribution of those prior scans through a consistency check against the current measurements, avoiding any separate alignment step and tolerating differences in scan protocols. This setup produces higher scores on standard image quality measures and keeps small anatomical details intact even when acceleration is pushed high. A reader would care because shorter exams could lower patient burden and raise the number of scans possible per scanner without sacrificing diagnostic value. The approach treats the prior information as useful side context rather than a fixed template.

Core claim

L-TGVN leverages prior scans as side information to reconstruct the current scan from heavily undersampled measurements, constrains the influence of prior scans to be consistent with the acquired measurements, does not require explicit pre-registration, accommodates protocol differences, and yields consistent improvements in quantitative metrics with better preservation of fine structures at challenging accelerations.

What carries the argument

The Longitudinal Trust-Guided Variational Network (L-TGVN), a variational network that treats prior scans as side information whose contribution is limited by a trust mechanism enforcing consistency with the current undersampled measurements.

If this is right

  • Consistent gains in quantitative image metrics over both prior-guided and non-prior baselines.
  • Improved retention of fine anatomical structures at high acceleration factors.
  • Reconstruction proceeds without a separate pre-registration step between visits.
  • The network tolerates changes in sequence parameters across different acquisition sessions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the consistency constraint proves robust, the same architecture could accept multiple historical scans as input without additional alignment modules.
  • Clinics might adopt variable acceleration schedules that increase when a recent prior scan is available.
  • The method suggests a route toward adaptive, patient-specific scan protocols that reuse past data to reduce total measurement time.

Load-bearing premise

That prior scans remain sufficiently informative despite temporal changes, misalignment, and protocol drift, and that the trust-guided constraint can reliably limit their influence without explicit registration or alignment preprocessing.

What would settle it

A direct comparison on scan pairs that include large pathology progression or protocol changes, checking whether L-TGVN performance drops below that of matched non-longitudinal baselines on the same data.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.04419 by Arda Atal{\i}k, Daniel K. Sodickson, Sumit Chopra.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Longitudinal trust-guided disambiguation of solutions to the LIP. As side information, we used 11 axial T2-weighted (T2w) DICOM slices from the most recent prior study to reconstruct a target axial T2w slice in the follow-up exam from its highly undersampled k-space measurements. Beyond certain levels of undersampling, this LIP becomes ill-posed: multiple candidate images can explain the measurements, and … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Using longitudinal priors significantly enhances reconstruction quality. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Reconstructions from B1 (20×) demonstrating effectiveness of L [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

MRI provides excellent soft-tissue contrast without ionizing radiation, but long acquisition times increase patient discomfort while also raising exam costs and limiting scanner throughput. A common approach to reduce scan time is to acquire fewer measurements, which yields an ill-posed linear inverse problem; recovering diagnostic-quality images therefore requires incorporating prior knowledge beyond the measured data. In follow-up exams, the most recent prior scan of a patient can provide a highly informative subject-specific context, but practical use is complicated by temporal changes (including pathology progression), misalignment between scans, and protocol drift across acquisitions. In this work, we introduce L-TGVN, a Longitudinal Trust-Guided Variational Network that leverages prior scans as side information to reconstruct the current scan from heavily undersampled measurements. Crucially, L-TGVN constrains the influence of prior scans to be consistent with the acquired measurements. Unlike many existing longitudinal reconstruction methods, it does not require explicit pre-registration between prior and current scans. It further accommodates differences in acquisition protocols across visits (e.g., changes in sequence parameters). We evaluate L-TGVN against matched-capacity baselines, including prior-guided methods and methods that do not use longitudinal priors, and observe consistent improvements in standard quantitative metrics together with better preservation of fine structures at challenging accelerations. Source code is available at github.com/sodicksonlab/L-TGVN.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper introduces L-TGVN, a Longitudinal Trust-Guided Variational Network for reconstructing current MRI scans from heavily undersampled k-space measurements. It incorporates prior patient scans as side information, constrains their influence via a trust-guided mechanism to remain consistent with the acquired data, avoids explicit pre-registration, and handles protocol differences across visits. Experiments on longitudinal datasets demonstrate consistent gains in quantitative metrics (e.g., PSNR, SSIM) over matched-capacity baselines that either use or omit longitudinal priors, with improved preservation of fine anatomical structures at high acceleration factors. Public code is released.

Significance. If the central claims hold under the reported conditions, the work offers a practical advance for personalized rapid MRI by enabling reliable use of longitudinal priors without registration preprocessing or protocol matching. This could reduce scan times in follow-up exams while maintaining diagnostic quality. The release of source code supports reproducibility and allows direct verification of the variational construction and trust constraint.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract and introduction state that the method 'constrains the influence of prior scans to be consistent with the acquired measurements,' but the precise mathematical form of this constraint (e.g., the trust weight or data-consistency term) should be stated explicitly in the methods section with reference to the relevant equation.
  2. Table or figure captions reporting quantitative results should include the number of test subjects, acceleration factors tested, and statistical significance tests to allow readers to assess the robustness of the reported improvements.
  3. The claim that the approach 'accommodates differences in acquisition protocols' would benefit from a short ablation or example showing performance under mismatched sequence parameters (e.g., flip angle or TE changes) to substantiate the statement.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary, significance assessment, and recommendation of minor revision. No specific major comments are provided in the report, so there are no individual points requiring point-by-point rebuttal or revision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper presents L-TGVN as a longitudinal trust-guided variational network that incorporates prior scans as side information while enforcing consistency with new measurements, without explicit registration. No equations or claims in the provided abstract or description reduce a prediction or result to a fitted parameter or self-citation by construction. The method is defined independently, with evaluation against baselines and code availability for verification. This matches the reader's assessment of low circularity risk; the central construction does not collapse to its inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the trust mechanism and variational network are described at high level only.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5784 in / 1039 out tokens · 37898 ms · 2026-06-28T04:24:56.733033+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

24 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    IEEE Trans

    Aggarwal, H.K., Mani, M.P., Jacob, M.: MoDL: Model -Based Deep Learning Architecture for Inverse Problems. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 38(2), 394–405 (2019)

    2019

  2. [2]

    IEEE Trans

    Atalık, A., Chopra, S., Sodickson, D.K.: A Trust-Guided approach to MR image reconstruction with side information. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 45(1), 190–205 (2025)

    2025

  3. [3]

    -M., Yan, Y., Chen, G., Xu, Y., Hu, Y., Shao, L., Fu, H.: Multimodal Transformer for Accelerated MR Imaging

    Feng, C. -M., Yan, Y., Chen, G., Xu, Y., Hu, Y., Shao, L., Fu, H.: Multimodal Transformer for Accelerated MR Imaging. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 42(10), 2804–2816 (2022)

    2022

  4. [4]

    Hammernik, K., Klatzer, T., Kobler, E., Recht, M.P., Sodickson, D.K., Pock, T., Knoll, F.: Learning a variational network for reconstruction of accelerated MRI data. Magn. Reson. Med. 79(6), 3055–3071 (2018)

    2018

  5. [5]

    Hennig, J., Nauerth, A., Friedburg, H.: RARE imaging: a fast imaging method for clinical MR. Magn. Reson. Med. 3(6), 823–833 (1986)

    1986

  6. [6]

    Neurocomputing 376, 128–140 (2020)

    Kang, R., Ai, D., Qu, G., Li, Q., Li, X., Jiang, Y., Huang, Y., Song, H., Wang, Y., Yang, J.: Prior information constrained alternating direction method of multipliers for longitudinal compressive sensing MR imaging. Neurocomputing 376, 128–140 (2020)

    2020

  7. [7]

    Karras, T., Aittala, M., Aila, T., Laine, S.: Elucidating the design space of diffusion -based generative models. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 35, 26565–26577 (2022)

    2022

  8. [8]

    Landweber, L.: An Iteration Formula for Fredholm Integral Equations of the First Kind. Amer. J. Math. 73(3), 615–624 (1951)

    1951

  9. [9]

    In: Proc

    Levac, B., Jalal, A., Ramchandran, K., Tamir, J.I.: MRI Reconstruction with Side Information using Diffusion Models. In: Proc. Asilomar Conf. Signals, Syst., Comput., pp. 1436–1442 (2023)

    2023

  10. [10]

    Li, G., Hennig, J., Raithel, E., Büchert, M., Paul, D., Korvink, J.G., Zaitsev, M.: Incorporation of image data from a previous examination in 3D serial MR imaging. Magn. Reson. Mater. Phys. Biol. Med. 28(5), 413–425 (2015)

    2015

  11. [11]

    Lustig, M., Donoho, D.L., Pauly, J.M.: Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 58(6), 1182–1195 (2007)

    2007

  12. [12]

    arXiv:2505.02470 (2025)

    Oved, T., Lena, B., Najac, C.F., Shen, S., Rosen, M.S., Webb, A., Shimron, E.: Deep learning of personalized priors from past MRI scans enables fast, quality-enhanced point-of-care MRI with low-cost systems. arXiv:2505.02470 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Pruessmann, K.P., Weiger, M., Scheidegger, M.B., Boesiger, P.: SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 42(5), 952–962 (1999)

    1999

  14. [14]

    Radmanesh, A., Muckley, M.J., Murrell, T., Lindsey, E., Sriram, A., Knoll, F., Sodickson, D.K., Lui, Y.W.: Exploring the Acceleration Limits of Deep Learning Variational Network –based Two - dimensional Brain MRI. Radiol. Artif. Intell. 4(6), e210313 (2022)

    2022

  15. [15]

    In: Proc

    Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., Brox, T.: U -Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation. In: Proc. Int. Conf. Med. Image Comput. Comput.-Assist. Intervent., pp. 234–241 (2015) L-TGVN: Leveraging Longitudinal Priors for Personalized Rapid MRI 11

    2015

  16. [16]

    In: Proc

    Samsonov, A.A., Velikina, J.V., Fleming, J.O., Schiebler, M.L., Field, A.S.: Accelerated serial MR imaging in multiple sclerosis using baseline scan information. In: Proc. 18th Annu. Meeting Int. Soc. Magn. Reson. Med. (ISMRM), p. 4876 (2010)

    2010

  17. [17]

    Shamaei, A., Stebner, A., Bosshart, S.L., Ospel , J., Ginde, G., Bento, M., Souza, R.: Enhancing and accelerating brain MRI through deep learning reconstruction using prior subject-specific imaging. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 110558 (2025)

    2025

  18. [18]

    Sodickson, D.K., Manning, W.J.: Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): Fast imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays. Magn. Reson. Med. 38(4), 591–603 (1997)

    1997

  19. [19]

    In: Proc

    Sriram, A., Zbontar , J., Murrell, T., Defazio, A., Zitnick, C.L., Yakubova, N., Knoll, F., Johnson, P.: End-to-End Variational Networks for Accelerated MRI Reconstruction. In: Proc. Int. Conf. Med. Image Comput. Comput.-Assist. Intervent., pp. 64–73 (2020)

    2020

  20. [20]

    Tsao, J., Behnia, B., Webb, A.G.: Unifying linear prior -information-driven methods for accelerated image acquisition. Magn. Reson. Med. 46(4), 652–660 (2001)

    2001

  21. [21]

    arXiv:2407.00537 (2025)

    Urman, Y., Shah, Z., Kumar, A., Soares, B.P., Setsompop , K.: Accelerating MRI with Longitudinally - informed Latent Posterior Sampling. arXiv:2407.00537 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    IEEE Trans

    Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Sheikh, H.R., Simoncelli, E.P.: Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 13(4), 600–612 (2004)

    2004

  23. [23]

    Weizman, L., Eldar, Y.C., Ben Bashat, D.: Compressed sensing for longitudinal MRI: an adaptive - weighted approach. Med. Phys. 42(9), 5195–5208 (2015)

    2015

  24. [24]

    Weizman, L., Eldar, Y.C., Ben Bashat, D.: Reference-based MRI. Med. Phys. 43(10), 5357–5369 (2016)

    2016