pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.04587 · v1 · pith:3JJOT762new · submitted 2026-06-03 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Efficient Magnetic Spin-Filtering and Persistent Spin-Currents in Lifshitz-Transitioned Altermagnets: A Route to Open-Orbit Spintronics

Wun-Hao Kang , Yu-Ting Hsiao , Jozef Genzor , Yaroslav Zhumagulov , Ming-Hao Liu , Denis Kochan This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 05:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords altermagnetsLifshitz transitionspin filteringFermi surfacespintronicspersistent currentsopen orbitsmagneto-transport
0
0 comments X

The pith

A Lifshitz transition in two-dimensional altermagnets creates non-contractible Fermi contours that enable spin-selective open channels for magneto-transport.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper establishes that a homotopic Lifshitz transition in two-dimensional altermagnets reconfigures the Fermi surface into non-contractible contours. These contours give rise to spin-pure open channels that are directional and protected by geometry rather than gaps. The result is three magneto-transport effects: open-orbit focusing with lensing and retroreflection, efficient magnetic spin filtering, and tunable persistent spin currents in nanotubes. Such effects occur without net magnetization or strong spin-orbit coupling. This positions Lifshitz-transitioned altermagnets as a platform for topology-enabled spintronics based on Fermi-surface winding.

Core claim

A homotopic Lifshitz transition in two-dimensional altermagnets produces non-contractible Fermi contours that confine carriers to geometrically protected, spin-selective open channels. These channels, analogous to topological edge modes but metallic and protected by Fermi-surface winding, lead to open-orbit focusing with perfect lensing and retroreflection, high-efficiency magnetic spin filtering, and chirality-tunable spin persistent currents in altermagnetic nanotubes.

What carries the argument

Non-contractible Fermi contours from the homotopic Lifshitz transition, serving as the source of spin-selective open channels protected by winding number.

If this is right

  • Open-orbit focusing with perfect lensing and retroreflection of spin carriers.
  • High-efficiency magnetic spin filtering in the absence of net magnetization.
  • Chirality-tunable spin persistent currents in altermagnetic nanotubes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This mechanism could extend to three-dimensional altermagnets if similar transitions can be induced.
  • Device applications might include spin filters that operate at room temperature if disorder resistance holds.
  • The winding protection suggests robustness that could be compared to conventional topological insulators in experiments.

Load-bearing premise

The Lifshitz transition must produce non-contractible Fermi contours that remain spin-pure and geometrically protected even when disorder and interactions are present.

What would settle it

If experiments on candidate two-dimensional altermagnets show closed Fermi surfaces or spin-mixed transport after the transition, rather than open spin-selective channels, the predicted signatures would not appear.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.04587 by Denis Kochan, Jozef Genzor, Ming-Hao Liu, Wun-Hao Kang, Yaroslav Zhumagulov, Yu-Ting Hsiao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Spectral and homotopic characteristics of 2D [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Persistent spin currents (per unit length) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Longitudinal and transverse bare susceptibilities, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Evolution of loop topologies and homotopy classes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Altermagnets offer a unique venue for spin transport due to their vanishing net magnetization and momentum-dependent spin splitting. We demonstrate that a homotopic Lifshitz transition in two-dimensional altermagnets creates a regime where carriers are confined to geometrically protected, spin-selective open channels. These channels originate from non-contractible Fermi contours and act as metallic analogues of topological edge modes: they are sharply directional, spin-pure, and protected by Fermi-surface winding rather than an energy gap or boundary confinement. We predict three striking magneto-transport signatures of such topologically reconfigured altermagnets: open-orbit focusing with perfect lensing and retroreflection, high-efficiency magnetic spin filtering, and chirality-tunable spin persistent currents in altermagnetic nanotubes. Our results establish altermagnets as a platform where Fermi-surface winding directly engineers spin transport, bypassing the requirements for ferromagnetism or strong spin-orbit coupling. These findings identify Lifshitz-transitioned altermagnets as a route to topology-enabled spintronics that transcends the limitations of conventional edge-state paradigms.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that a homotopic Lifshitz transition in two-dimensional altermagnets produces non-contractible, spin-selective Fermi contours that function as geometrically protected open channels (metallic analogues of topological edge modes). These enable three magneto-transport signatures: open-orbit focusing with perfect lensing and retroreflection, high-efficiency magnetic spin filtering, and chirality-tunable spin persistent currents in altermagnetic nanotubes. The work positions Fermi-surface winding as an alternative protection mechanism that bypasses requirements for ferromagnetism or strong spin-orbit coupling.

Significance. If the central predictions are substantiated by explicit calculations, the result would be significant for spintronics and mesoscopic physics: it identifies a concrete route to spin-selective transport in altermagnets that relies on Fermi-surface topology rather than gapped protection or boundary confinement, potentially enabling new device concepts such as spin filters and persistent-current elements without net magnetization.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and §2 (model): the three predicted signatures (open-orbit focusing, spin filtering, persistent currents) are stated without any Hamiltonian, band-structure equations, or numerical evidence in the abstract; the central claims therefore rest on unshown derivations, preventing assessment of whether the non-contractible contours remain spin-pure under the stated assumptions.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph on open channels): the claim that the Fermi contours 'remain spin-pure and geometrically protected under realistic disorder and interactions' is load-bearing for all three signatures yet is presented without explicit disorder averaging, interaction terms, or stability analysis; this must be demonstrated with concrete calculations to support the protection mechanism.
minor comments (2)
  1. Define 'homotopic Lifshitz transition' explicitly and contrast it with conventional Lifshitz transitions; the term appears central but is not standard.
  2. Provide at least one figure or table showing the Fermi contours before and after the transition to illustrate the non-contractible character.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive report. We address each major comment below, clarifying the content of the manuscript and indicating revisions where the presentation can be strengthened.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and §2 (model): the three predicted signatures (open-orbit focusing, spin filtering, persistent currents) are stated without any Hamiltonian, band-structure equations, or numerical evidence in the abstract; the central claims therefore rest on unshown derivations, preventing assessment of whether the non-contractible contours remain spin-pure under the stated assumptions.

    Authors: Section 2 of the manuscript introduces the altermagnetic Hamiltonian with explicit momentum-dependent spin-splitting terms and derives the Lifshitz transition analytically. Band-structure equations and numerical Fermi-surface plots (Figs. 1–3) demonstrate the emergence of non-contractible, spin-selective contours. The abstract is length-limited and therefore omits these technical elements, but the spin purity follows directly from the symmetry of the Hamiltonian and is visible in the plotted contours. We will revise the abstract to include a concise reference to the model Hamiltonian and the Lifshitz transition so that the central claims are more self-contained. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph on open channels): the claim that the Fermi contours 'remain spin-pure and geometrically protected under realistic disorder and interactions' is load-bearing for all three signatures yet is presented without explicit disorder averaging, interaction terms, or stability analysis; this must be demonstrated with concrete calculations to support the protection mechanism.

    Authors: The protection is argued to follow from the topological character of the non-contractible Fermi contours (winding number under the altermagnetic symmetry), which precludes backscattering channels that would mix spins even in the presence of weak, symmetry-preserving disorder. The manuscript does not contain explicit disorder-averaged calculations or interaction terms. We will add a short paragraph in the revised text that outlines the symmetry-based robustness argument and notes the regime of validity; a full numerical stability analysis lies beyond the present scope but can be pursued in follow-up work if required. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's central claims consist of theoretical predictions for transport signatures (open-orbit focusing, spin filtering, persistent currents) arising from a modeled Lifshitz transition that produces non-contractible, spin-selective Fermi contours. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or self-citation chain; the protection mechanism is introduced as an alternative to gapped topological protection without invoking uniqueness theorems or ansatzes from prior author work. The derivation chain is self-contained within the stated model assumptions and does not exhibit any of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted. The central claim implicitly assumes the existence of a spin-selective Lifshitz transition whose microscopic origin is not stated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5763 in / 1206 out tokens · 16938 ms · 2026-06-28T05:09:18.091536+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Žutić, J

    I. Žutić, J. Fabian, and S. Das Sarma, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 323 (2004)

    2004

  2. [2]

    Sinova, S

    J. Sinova, S. O. Valenzuela, J. Wunderlich, C. H. Back, and T. Jungwirth, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 1213 (2015)

    2015

  3. [3]

    Baltz, A

    V. Baltz, A. Manchon, M. Tsoi, T. Moriyama, T. Ono, and Y. Tserkovnyak, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015005 (2018)

    2018

  4. [4]

    Dal Din, O

    A. Dal Din, O. J. Amin, P. Wadley, and K. W. Edmonds, npj Spintronics2, 25 (2024)

    2024

  5. [5]

    Manchon, J

    A. Manchon, J. Železný, I. M. Miron, T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, A. Thiaville, K. Garello, and P. Gambardella, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 035004 (2019)

    2019

  6. [6]

    Šmejkal, J

    L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022)

    2022

  7. [7]

    Mazin (The PRX Editors), Phys

    I. Mazin (The PRX Editors), Phys. Rev. X12, 040002 (2022)

    2022

  8. [8]

    Šmejkal, J

    L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022)

    2022

  9. [9]

    C. Song, H. Bai, Z. Zhou, L. Han, H. Reichlova, J. H. Dil, J. Liu, X. Chen, and F. Pan, Nature Reviews Materials 10, 473 (2025)

    2025

  10. [10]

    Jungwirth, J

    T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, R. M. Fernandes, Q. Liu, H. Watanabe, S. Murakami, S. Nakatsuji, and L. Šme- jkal, Nature649, 837 (2026)

    2026

  11. [11]

    González-Hernández, L

    R. González-Hernández, L. Šmejkal, K. Výborný, Y. Ya- hagi, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, and J. Železný, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 127701 (2021)

    2021

  12. [12]

    Šmejkal, A

    L. Šmejkal, A. B. Hellenes, R. González-Hernández, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Phys. Rev. X12, 011028 (2022)

    2022

  13. [13]

    A. Bose, N. J. Schreiber, R. Jain, D.-F. Shao, H. P. Nair, J. Sun, X. S. Zhang, D. A. Muller, E. Y. Tsym- bal, D. G. Schlom, and D. C. Ralph, Nature Electronics 5, 267 (2022)

    2022

  14. [14]

    H. Bai, L. Han, X. Y. Feng, Y. J. Zhou, R. X. Su, Q. Wang, L. Y. Liao, W. X. Zhu, X. Z. Chen, F. Pan, X. L. Fan, and C. Song, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 197202 (2022)

    2022

  15. [15]

    Z. Feng, X. Zhou, L. Šmejkal, L. Wu, Z. Zhu, H. Guo, R. González-Hernández, X. Wang, H. Yan, P. Qin, X. Zhang, H. Wu, H. Chen, Z. Meng, L. Liu, Z. Xia, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, and Z. Liu, Nature Electronics 5, 735 (2022)

    2022

  16. [16]

    Samanta, D.-F

    K. Samanta, D.-F. Shao, and E. Y. Tsymbal, Nano Let- ters25, 3150 (2025)

    2025

  17. [17]

    P.-H. Fu, Q. Lv, Y. Xu, J. Cayao, J.-F. Liu, and X.-L. Yu, npj Quantum Materials10, 111 (2025)

    2025

  18. [18]

    L. Bai, W. Feng, S. Liu, L. Šmejkal, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, Advanced Functional Materials34, 2409327 (2024)

    2024

  19. [19]

    S. S. Fender, O. Gonzalez, and D. K. Bediako, Journal of the American Chemical Society147, 2257 (2025)

    2025

  20. [20]

    R.Tamang, S.Gurung, D.P.Rai, S.Brahimi,andS.Lou- nis, Magnetism5, 10.3390/magnetism5030017 (2025)

    work page doi:10.3390/magnetism5030017 2025

  21. [21]

    Liao, Y.-C

    C.-T. Liao, Y.-C. Wang, Y.-C. Tien, S.-Y. Huang, and D. Qu, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 056701 (2024)

    2024

  22. [22]

    I. M. Lifshitz, Soviet Physics JETP11, 1130 (1960)

    1960

  23. [23]

    Y. M. Blanter, M. I. Kaganov, A. V. Pantsulaya, and A. A. Varlamov, Physics Reports245, 159 (1994)

    1994

  24. [24]

    I. M. Lifshitz, M. I. Kaganov, and V. A. Peschanskii, Soviet Physics JETP5, 876 (1957)

    1957

  25. [25]

    M. I. Kaganov and I. M. Lifshits, Soviet Physics Uspekhi 22, 904 (1979)

    1979

  26. [26]

    See Supplemental Material at URL-will-be-inserted-by- publisher: for further calculational details and other pa- rameter regimes

  27. [27]

    Zeng, M.-Y

    M. Zeng, M.-Y. Zhu, Y.-P. Zhu, X.-R. Liu, X.-M. Ma, Y.- J. Hao, P. Liu, G. Qu, Y. Yang, Z. Jiang, K. Yamagami, M. Arita, X. Zhang, T.-H. Shao, Y. Dai, K. Shimada, Z. Liu, M. Ye, Y. Huang, Q. Liu, and C. Liu, Advanced Science11, 2406529 (2024)

    2024

  28. [28]

    G. Yang, Z. Li, S. Yang, J. Li, H. Zheng, W. Zhu, Z. Pan, Y. Xu, S. Cao, W. Zhao, A. Jana, J. Zhang, M. Ye, Y. Song, L.-H. Hu, L. Yang, J. Fujii, I. Vobornik, M. Shi, H. Yuan, Y. Zhang, Y. Xu, and Y. Liu, Nature Commu- nications16, 1442 (2025)

    2025

  29. [29]

    J. Ding, Z. Jiang, X. Chen, Z. Tao, Z. Liu, T. Li, J. Liu, J. Sun, J. Cheng, J. Liu, Y. Yang, R. Zhang, L. Deng, W. Jing, Y. Huang, Y. Shi, M. Ye, S. Qiao, Y. Wang, Y. Guo, D. Feng, and D. Shen, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 206401 (2024)

    2024

  30. [30]

    Fedchenko, J

    O. Fedchenko, J. Minár, A. Akashdeep, S. W. D. Souza, D. Vasilyev, O. Tkach, L. Odenbreit, Q. Nguyen, D. Kut- nyakhov, N. Wind, L. Wenthaus, M. Scholz, K. Ross- nagel, M. Hoesch, M. Aeschlimann, B. Stadtmüller, M. Kläui, G. Schönhense, T. Jungwirth, A. B. Hellenes, 8 G. Jakob, L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and H.-J. Elmers, Sci- ence Advances10, eadj4883 (2024)

    2024

  31. [31]

    S. M. Hussain and K. Son, Physica B: Condensed Matter 716, 417723 (2025)

    2025

  32. [32]

    I. H. Choi, S. G. Jeong, B. Jalan, and J. S. Lee, Nano Convergence13, 1 (2026)

    2026

  33. [33]

    Wang, Z.-Y

    Y.-C. Wang, Z.-Y. Shen, C.-H. Lin, W.-C. Hsu, Y.-S. Chen, Y.-Y. Chin, A. K. Singh, W.-L. Lee, C.-T. Chen, S.-Y. Huang, and D. Qu, Nano Letters26, 2548 (2026)

    2026

  34. [34]

    McKenzie, X

    R.B.Regmi, H.Bhandari, B.Thapa, Y.Hao, N.Sharma, J. McKenzie, X. Chen, A. Nayak, M. El Gazzah, B. G. Márkus, L. Forró, X. Liu, H. Cao, J. F. Mitchell, I. I. Mazin, and N. J. Ghimire, Nature Communications16, 4399 (2025)

    2025

  35. [35]

    Y. Liu, J. Yu, and C.-C. Liu, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 206702 (2024)

    2024

  36. [36]

    J. W. González, T. Brumme, E. S. Morell, and A. M. León, npj 2D Materials and Applications10, 11 (2025)

    2025

  37. [37]

    O. J. Amin, A. Dal Din, E. Golias, Y. Niu, A. Za- kharov, S. C. Fromage, C. J. B. Fields, S. L. Heywood, R. B. Cousins, F. Maccherozzi, J. Krempaský, J. H. Dil, D. Kriegner, B. Kiraly, R. P. Campion, A. W. Rushforth, K. W. Edmonds, S. S. Dhesi, L. Šmejkal, T. Jungwirth, and P. Wadley, Nature636, 348 (2024)

    2024

  38. [38]

    R. D. Gonzalez Betancourt, J. Zubáč, R. Gonzalez- Hernandez, K. Geishendorf, Z. Šobáň, G. Springholz, K. Olejník, L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, S. T. B. Goennenwein, A. Thomas, H. Reichlová, J. Železný, and D. Kriegner, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 036702 (2023)

    2023

  39. [39]

    K.D.Belashchenko,Phys.Rev.Lett.134,086701(2025)

    2025

  40. [40]

    M. Naka, Y. Motome, and H. Seo, npj Spintronics3, 1 (2025)

    2025

  41. [41]

    S. V. Streltsov and S.-W. Cheong, npj Quantum Materi- als10, 102 (2025)

    2025

  42. [42]

    P. Das, V. Leeb, J. Knolle, and M. Knap, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 263402 (2024)

    2024

  43. [43]

    M. Gu, Y. Liu, H. Zhu, K. Yananose, X. Chen, Y. Hu, A. Stroppa, and Q. Liu, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 106802 (2025)

    2025

  44. [44]

    X. Duan, J. Zhang, Z. Zhu, Y. Liu, Z. Zhang, I. Žutić, and T. Zhou, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 106801 (2025)

    2025

  45. [45]

    R. Peng, S. Fang, P. Ho, F. Liu, T. Zhou, J. Liu, and Y. S. Ang, npj Quantum Materials11, 5 (2025)

    2025

  46. [46]

    Camerano, A

    L. Camerano, A. O. Fumega, J. L. Lado, A. Stroppa, and G. Profeta, npj 2D Materials and Applications9, 75 (2025)

    2025

  47. [47]

    H. G. Giil and J. Linder, Phys. Rev. B109, 134511 (2024)

    2024

  48. [48]

    Nagae, A

    Y. Nagae, A. P. Schnyder, and S. Ikegaya, Phys. Rev. B 111, L100507 (2025)

    2025

  49. [49]

    T. A. Maier and S. Okamoto, Phys. Rev. B108, L100402 (2023)

    2023

  50. [50]

    Brekke, A

    B. Brekke, A. Brataas, and A. Sudbø, Phys. Rev. B108, 224421 (2023)

    2023

  51. [51]

    M. Roig, A. Kreisel, Y. Yu, B. M. Andersen, and D. F. Agterberg, Phys. Rev. B110, 144412 (2024)

    2024

  52. [52]

    Hamiltonian

    For this reason it will be more appropriate to callHas the grand-canonical or grand-Hamiltonian, however, in order to simplify terminology we use just a plain term “Hamiltonian”

  53. [53]

    Special case, m= 1,n= 0, corresponds to Eq

    Obviously, HamiltonianH= ∑ kσEσ(k)c† kσckσwithen- ergy dispersion E↑(k) =−µ0 + 2t1[cos (k·a1) + cos (k·a2)] + 2t2 cos (mk·a1−nk·a2) andE ↓(k) =E ↑(Rot±90◦k), gives rise for differentµ0 andt 2 to a family of open Fermi contours with higher winding vectorsw↑= (±˜m,±˜n)andw↓= (±˜n,±˜m), where˜m= 0,...mand˜n= 0,1,...,n. Special case, m= 1,n= 0, corresponds to...

  54. [54]

    C. W. Groth, M. Wimmer, A. R. Akhmerov, and X. Waintal, New J. Phys.16, 063065 (2014)

    2014

  55. [55]

    While this is about2–3times larger than the lattice constant in typical metallic AMs, like MnSe (3.67 Å), MnTe (4.49 Å), and RuO2 (4.49 Å), it substantially low- ers the computational cost without qualitatively affecting physics

  56. [56]

    V. S. Tsoi, J. Bass, and P. Wyder, Rev. Mod. Phys.71, 1641 (1999)

    1999

  57. [57]

    B. Wu, V. Barrena, H. Suderow, and I. Guillamón, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 022042 (2020)

    2020

  58. [58]

    A. V. Nikolaev, Phys. Rev. B104, 035419 (2021)

    2021

  59. [59]

    V. A. Zakharov, A. M. Bozkurt, A. R. Akhmerov, and D. O. Oriekhov, Phys. Rev. B109, L081103 (2024)

    2024

  60. [60]

    S. S. Hegde, V. Subramanyan, B. Bradlyn, and S. Vishveshwara, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 156802 (2019)

    2019

  61. [61]

    Subramanyan, S

    V. Subramanyan, S. S. Hegde, S. Vishveshwara, and B. Bradlyn, Annals of Physics435, 168470 (2021), spe- cial issue on Philip W. Anderson

    2021

  62. [62]

    I. O. Kulik, JETP Lett.11, 275 (1970)

    1970

  63. [63]

    I. O. Kulik, Physica B: Condensed Matter284-288, 1880 (2000)

    2000

  64. [64]

    (2), andf(E)the corresponding Fermi-Dirac weights at tem- peratureT

    Static, bare spin-polarization function (here called sus- ceptibility) reads χ0 σσ′(q) = 1 N ∑ k f[Eσ′(k,µ0)]−f[Eσ(k+q,µ0)] Eσ(k+q,µ0)−Eσ′(k,µ0) , whereE σ(k,µ0)are AM eigen-energies given by Eq. (2), andf(E)the corresponding Fermi-Dirac weights at tem- peratureT. Consequently, the longitudinal and trans- verse polarizations equal:χ0 ∥(q) = 1 2(χ0 ↑↑(q) +...

  65. [65]

    Due to particle–hole symmetry,µ0↦→−µ0 the suscepti- bility profilesχ0 ∥/⊥(q)at positiveµ0 are identical to those at the corresponding negativeµ0

  66. [66]

    Doniach and E

    S. Doniach and E. H. Sondheimer,Green ’s Functions for Solid State Physicists, Frontiers in Physics Series, No. 44 (Imperial College Press, 1998)

    1998

  67. [67]

    Jiang, M

    B. Jiang, M. Hu, J. Bai, Z. Song, C. Mu, G. Qu, W. Li, W. Zhu, H. Pi, Z. Wei, Y.-J. Sun, Y. Huang, X. Zheng, Y. Peng, L. He, S. Li, J. Luo, Z. Li, G. Chen, H. Li, H. Weng, and T. Qian, Nature Physics21, 754 (2025)

    2025

  68. [68]

    Zhang, X

    F. Zhang, X. Cheng, Z. Yin, C. Liu, L. Deng, Y. Qiao, Z. Shi, S. Zhang, J. Lin, Z. Liu, M. Ye, Y. Huang, X. Meng, C. Zhang, T. Okuda, K. Shimada, S. Cui, 9 Y. Zhao, G.-H. Cao, S. Qiao, J. Liu, and C. Chen, Nature Physics21, 760 (2025). Methods. Model and Fermi-contour analysisAll calculations are based on the minimal spin-diagonal tight-binding model of a...

    2025