pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.04598 · v1 · pith:DB6N3XZYnew · submitted 2026-06-03 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Spin-polarization of the electric current in half-metallic Co₂MnSi Heusler thin films

Jos\'e Solano C\'ordova , Anna Maria Friedel , Quentin Rossi , J\'er\^ome Robert , Yves Henry , Philipp Pirro , S\'ebastien Petit-Watelot , St\'ephane Andrieu
show 1 more author
Matthieu Bailleul
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 05:43 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords spin polarizationhalf-metallicCo2MnSispin wave Doppler shiftspin-transfer torqueHeusler thin filmspropagating spin wave spectroscopy
0
0 comments X

The pith

The electric current in Co₂MnSi Heusler thin films is fully spin-polarized.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies propagating spin wave spectroscopy to patterned MgO/Co₂MnSi/MgO films and extracts the spin polarization of the flowing current from the observed Doppler shift. The data indicate that this polarization reaches 100 percent, confirming that the material's half-metallic band structure produces a current in which every electron shares the same spin direction. A reader would care because a fully polarized current means every charge carrier can contribute to spin-based operations rather than wasting energy on canceling spin components.

Core claim

The measurements reveal that the current is fully spin-polarized in the devices. This shows that the half-metallic character of the electron band structure translates into a fully spin polarized current flowing across the patterned films. A current-induced change in spin-wave attenuation is also observed and used to estimate the non-adiabatic spin-transfer-torque parameter.

What carries the argument

The spin wave Doppler shift detected by propagating spin wave spectroscopy, which directly encodes the drift velocity imparted by spin-polarized electrons and permits quantitative inversion to the polarization value.

Load-bearing premise

The observed Doppler shift is produced only by the spin polarization of the drifting electrons and can be inverted without significant interference from Oersted fields, heating, or errors in the spin-wave dispersion model.

What would settle it

An independent measurement on the same patterned films, for example by point-contact Andreev reflection or spin-resolved photoemission, returning a spin polarization value clearly below 100 percent.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.04598 by Anna Maria Friedel, J\'er\^ome Robert, Jos\'e Solano C\'ordova, Matthieu Bailleul, Philipp Pirro, Quentin Rossi, S\'ebastien Petit-Watelot, St\'ephane Andrieu, Yves Henry.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) High-resolution transmission electron microscopy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Extracted spin wave Doppler shift as function of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Current-induced modification to the mutual induc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) X-ray diffraction scan showing the substrate peaks and the Co [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. TEM micrographs of the deposited stack (a) High-resolution TEM image. (b) High angle annular dark field-scanning [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Intensity profiles (left) extracted from a Fourier filtered HAADF-STEM micrograph (right). The gray marks in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Magnetization hysteresis loop where the external magnetic field is applied along Co [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Ferromagnetic resonance for a thin film Co [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Effective [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Microscope picture of spin wave Doppler device with a sketch of the experimental geometry. The ferromagnetic strip [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (a) Calculation of the Fourier transform of the current density of an antenna displaying maxima around the wave vectors [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Frequency shift due to the Oersted field in a patterned strip on a MgO/Co [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Current-induced relative change of amplitude [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. (left) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_12.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Using propagating spin wave spectroscopy we measure the spin wave Doppler shift in patterned MgO/Co$_2$MnSi/MgO thin films and determine the degree of spin-polarization of the electric current. Our measurements reveal that the current is fully spin-polarized in the devices. This shows that the half-metallic character of the electron band structure translates into a fully spin polarized current flowing across the patterned films. Additionally, we measure a current-induced change of the spin-wave attenuation from which we estimate the non-adiabatic spin-transfer-torque parameter.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses propagating spin-wave spectroscopy to measure the current-induced Doppler shift of spin waves in patterned MgO/Co₂MnSi/MgO thin films. From the shift the authors extract a spin polarization P=1 for the electric current, concluding that the half-metallic band structure of Co₂MnSi produces a fully spin-polarized current in the devices; they additionally report a current-dependent change in spin-wave attenuation from which the non-adiabatic spin-transfer-torque parameter is estimated.

Significance. A rigorously validated demonstration that half-metallicity translates into P=1 current in a patterned Heusler film would be of clear interest for spintronic device design. The Doppler-shift approach is in principle direct, and the additional non-adiabatic parameter extraction is a useful byproduct. At present the quantitative support for the headline P=1 claim is not assessable from the reported data and analysis details.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / Doppler-shift section] Abstract and main text: the claim that the current is 'fully spin-polarized' rests on inversion of the observed Doppler shift via the standard formula Δf = (P j / (2π Ms)) * (g μB / ħ) * k, yet no error bars, raw frequency-shift data, fitting routines, or goodness-of-fit metrics are supplied, preventing assessment of whether P is statistically indistinguishable from 1 or merely >0.95.
  2. [Doppler-shift analysis] Doppler-shift analysis: the extraction of P assumes that Oersted-field and Joule-heating contributions to the frequency shift are negligible compared with the adiabatic spin-transfer-torque term; no zero-current field-calibration spectra, finite-element Oersted maps, or temperature-dependent reference measurements are described that would bound these systematics below the precision required for a P=1 claim.
  3. [Attenuation section] Attenuation analysis: the non-adiabatic parameter is stated to be obtained from the current-induced change in spin-wave attenuation, but the manuscript provides neither the explicit functional form used for the fit nor any discussion of how the adiabatic and non-adiabatic contributions are separated in the same data set.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions should explicitly state the current densities, microwave frequencies, and propagation lengths used for each trace so that the Doppler-shift data can be reproduced from the published figures.
  2. [Notation] Notation for the spin-polarization degree (P) and the non-adiabatic parameter (β) should be introduced once and used consistently; the abstract uses 'degree of spin-polarization' while the text switches between P and 'polarization'.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and constructive comments. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the quantitative support for our claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Doppler-shift section] Abstract and main text: the claim that the current is 'fully spin-polarized' rests on inversion of the observed Doppler shift via the standard formula Δf = (P j / (2π Ms)) * (g μB / ħ) * k, yet no error bars, raw frequency-shift data, fitting routines, or goodness-of-fit metrics are supplied, preventing assessment of whether P is statistically indistinguishable from 1 or merely >0.95.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of error bars, raw data, and fit details prevents full assessment of the P=1 result. In the revised manuscript we will include the raw frequency-shift versus current data, the fitting procedure with explicit error propagation, and goodness-of-fit metrics (e.g., reduced χ²) demonstrating that the extracted P is statistically consistent with unity within the stated uncertainty. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Doppler-shift analysis] Doppler-shift analysis: the extraction of P assumes that Oersted-field and Joule-heating contributions to the frequency shift are negligible compared with the adiabatic spin-transfer-torque term; no zero-current field-calibration spectra, finite-element Oersted maps, or temperature-dependent reference measurements are described that would bound these systematics below the precision required for a P=1 claim.

    Authors: The referee is correct that explicit bounds on Oersted and heating contributions were not provided. We will add (i) zero-current field-sweep calibration spectra confirming the resonance frequency is unaffected by the measurement geometry, (ii) finite-element Oersted-field maps showing the in-plane component is <1% of the applied field at the currents used, and (iii) temperature-dependent reference measurements establishing that Joule heating shifts are below the Doppler-shift resolution. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Attenuation section] Attenuation analysis: the non-adiabatic parameter is stated to be obtained from the current-induced change in spin-wave attenuation, but the manuscript provides neither the explicit functional form used for the fit nor any discussion of how the adiabatic and non-adiabatic contributions are separated in the same data set.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the functional form and separation procedure were not stated explicitly. The revised manuscript will include the full expression for the current-dependent attenuation (including both adiabatic and non-adiabatic terms) and a paragraph explaining how the two contributions are disentangled by their opposite dependence on current polarity and their different scaling with wavevector. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental measurement of Doppler shift to extract P

full rationale

The paper reports an experimental determination of spin polarization P via measured spin-wave Doppler shift in patterned films, using the standard adiabatic spin-transfer-torque formula. No derivation chain, first-principles calculation, or fitted parameter is presented as a 'prediction'; the central claim is a direct inversion of observed frequency shift data. The non-adiabatic parameter is separately estimated from attenuation change, again via standard analysis rather than self-referential fitting. No self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are invoked in a load-bearing way. The result is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is necessarily incomplete and limited to assumptions extractable from the measurement description.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Spin wave Doppler shift is linearly proportional to the spin polarization of the current with no significant non-spin-related contributions
    This relation is the basis for extracting the polarization degree from the measured frequency shift.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5669 in / 1344 out tokens · 32394 ms · 2026-06-28T05:43:07.054648+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Epitaxial $\mathrm{Co_2MnSi}$ with intrinsic magnetocrystalline anisotropy as a route to bias-field-free nonlinear half-metal magnonics at the nanoscale

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Epitaxial L2_1-ordered Co2MnSi waveguides exhibit intrinsic cubic magnetocrystalline anisotropy that suppresses first-order nonlinear instabilities over several GHz at zero bias and stabilizes low-bias Damon-Eshbach o...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    DC contacts are patterned arXiv:2606.04598v1 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] 3 Jun 2026 2 FIG

    direction) for the current conduction and for the propagation of spin waves. DC contacts are patterned arXiv:2606.04598v1 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] 3 Jun 2026 2 FIG. 1. (a) High-resolution transmission electron microscopy micrograph of the deposited film stack. (b) Microscope pic- ture of a spin wave Doppler shift device.jis the applied DC current,kis the wave ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    We also acknowledge financial support from Region Grand Est through its FRCR call (NanoTeraHertz and RaNGE projects) and from Agence Nationale de la Recherche un- der contract No

    and ANR-17-EURE-0024 under the framework of the French Investments for the Future Program. We also acknowledge financial support from Region Grand Est through its FRCR call (NanoTeraHertz and RaNGE projects) and from Agence Nationale de la Recherche un- der contract No. ANR-20-CE24-0012 (MARIN), ANR- 22-EXSP-0004 (SWING, France 2030 PEPR Spin pro- gram) a...

    2030

  3. [3]

    R. A. de Groot, F. M. Mueller, P. G. van Engen, and K. H. J. Buschow, Physical Review Letters50, 2024 (1983)

    2024

  4. [4]

    Francica, F

    S. Andrieu, A. Neggache, T. Hauet, T. Devolder, A. Hallal, M. Chshiev, A. M. Bataille, P. Le F` evre, and F. Bertran, Physical Review B93, 10.1103/Phys- RevB.93.094417 (2016)

    work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2016

  5. [6]

    de Melo, C

    C. de Melo, C. Guillemard, A. M. Friedel, V. Palin, J. C. Rojas-S´ anchez, S. Petit-Watelot, and S. Andrieu, Ap- plied Materials Today25, 101174 (2021)

    2021

  6. [7]

    Mantion, A

    S. Mantion, A. Torres Dias, M. Madami, S. Tac- chi, and N. Biziere, Journal of Applied Physics135, 10.1063/5.0189486 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0189486 2024

  7. [8]

    Solano, Q

    J. Solano, Q. Rossi, J. Robert, M. Lenertz, Y. Henry, B. Gobaut, D. Halley, and M. Bailleul, Physical Review B112, L140407 (2025)

    2025

  8. [9]

    A. M. Friedel,Heusler compounds for magnonic and spin- tronic applications, Ph.D. thesis, Universit´ e de Lorraine (2025)

    2025

  9. [10]

    See supplemental material

  10. [12]

    Guillemard, S

    C. Guillemard, S. Petit-Watelot, T. Devolder, L. Pasquier, P. Boulet, S. Migot, J. Ghanbaja, F. Bertran, and S. Andrieu, Journal of Applied Physics 128, 10.1063/5.0014241 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0014241 2020

  11. [13]

    In agreement with resistivity [4] if one considers their Au capping

  12. [14]

    C. O. Amorim, F. Mohseni, R. K. Dumas, V. S. Amaral, and J. S. Amaral, Measurement Science and Technology 32, 105602 (2021)

    2021

  13. [16]

    Vlaminck and M

    V. Vlaminck and M. Bailleul, Physical Review B81, 014425 (2010)

    2010

  14. [17]

    Bailleul and J.-Y

    M. Bailleul and J.-Y. Chauleau, inSpin Wave Confine- ment: Propagating Waves, Second Edition, edited by S. O. Demokritov (Pan Stanford Publishing, 2017) sec- ond edition ed

    2017

  15. [18]

    Vlaminck and M

    V. Vlaminck and M. Bailleul, Science (New York, N.Y.) 322, 410 (2008)

    2008

  16. [19]

    Fert and I

    A. Fert and I. A. Campbell, Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics6, 849 (1976)

    1976

  17. [20]

    Haidar and M

    M. Haidar and M. Bailleul, Physical Review B88, 054417 (2013)

    2013

  18. [21]

    Zhang and Z

    S. Zhang and Z. Li, Physical Review Letters93, 127204 (2004)

    2004

  19. [22]

    Thiaville, Y

    A. Thiaville, Y. Nakatani, J. Miltat, and Y. Suzuki, Eu- rophysics Letters69, 990 (2005)

    2005

  20. [26]

    Gladii, M

    O. Gladii, M. Haidar, Y. Henry, M. Kostylev, and M. Bailleul, Physical Review B93, 054430 (2016)

    2016

  21. [27]

    Ishikawa, N

    T. Ishikawa, N. Itabashi, T. Taira, K.-i. Matsuda, T. Ue- mura, and M. Yamamoto, Applied Physics Letters94, 10.1063/1.3083560 (2009)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3083560 2009

  22. [28]

    Ishikawa, N

    T. Ishikawa, N. Itabashi, T. Taira, K.-i. Matsuda, T. Ue- mura, and M. Yamamoto, Journal of Applied Physics 105, 10.1063/1.3089732 (2009)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3089732 2009

  23. [29]

    N. F. Mott, Advances in Physics13, 325 (1964)

    1964

  24. [30]

    Yamashita, A

    S. Yamashita, A. Sakuma, and M. Oogane, Physical Re- view B111, 214424 (2025)

    2025

  25. [31]

    I. I. Mazin, Physical Review Letters83, 1427 (1999)

    1999

  26. [32]

    Ebert, S

    H. Ebert, S. Mankovsky, K. Chadova, S. Polesya, J. Min´ ar, and D. K¨ odderitzsch, Physical Review B91, 165132 (2015)

    2015

  27. [33]

    J. N. Solano Cordova,Temperature dependent spin wave study of magnetic properties and spin-polarized electron transport in Fe1-xVx and Co2MnSi epitaxial films, The- ses, Universit´ e de Strasbourg (2024)

    2024

  28. [35]

    Note that despite the largeβ, due to the small magnitude ofδf Dopp the maximum modification to the damping amounts toα eff(±I) =α±β δfDopp fres = 1.2×10−3±4×10 −6 at maximal current

  29. [36]

    Sekiguchi, K

    K. Sekiguchi, K. Yamada, S.-M. Seo, K.-J. Lee, D. Chiba, K. Kobayashi, and T. Ono, Physical Review Letters108, 017203 (2012)

    2012

  30. [37]

    Chauleau, H

    J.-Y. Chauleau, H. G. Bauer, H. S. K¨ orner, J. Stigloher, 6 M. H¨ artinger, G. Woltersdorf, and C. H. Back, Physical Review B89, 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.020403 (2014). Supplemental material: Spin-polarization of the electric current in half-metallic Co2MnSi Heusler thin films I. SAMPLE GROWTH AND STRUCTURAL CHARACTERIZATION In this section we present a summa...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.89.020403 2014

  31. [38]

    To accurately determine the magnetic momentµ(H), we used a protocol developed by Amorin et al.[6] that provides a correction factorα ′ for the measurement of the magnetic moment

    easy axis. To accurately determine the magnetic momentµ(H), we used a protocol developed by Amorin et al.[6] that provides a correction factorα ′ for the measurement of the magnetic moment. This correction factor is determined from the measurements themselves by exploiting the relationship between the moment values determined from the DC and VSM modes of ...

  32. [39]

    A. M. Friedel,Heusler compounds for magnonic and spintronic applications, Ph.D. thesis, Universit´ e de Lorraine (2025)

    2025

  33. [40]

    Guillemard, S

    C. Guillemard, S. Petit-Watelot, T. Devolder, L. Pasquier, P. Boulet, S. Migot, J. Ghanbaja, F. Bertran, and S. Andrieu, Journal of Applied Physics128, 241102 (2020), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0014241/15256478/241102_1_online.pdf

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0014241/15256478/241102_1_online.pdf 2020

  34. [41]

    Gaier, J

    O. Gaier, J. Hamrle, S. J. Hermsdoerfer, H. Schultheiß, B. Hillebrands, Y. Sakuraba, M. Oogane, and Y. Ando, Journal of Applied Physics103, 103910 (2008), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1.2931023 /14876861/103910_1_online.pdf

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2931023 2008

  35. [42]

    Guillemard, S

    C. Guillemard, S. Petit-Watelot, L. Pasquier, D. Pierre, J. Ghanbaja, J.-C. Rojas-S´ anchez, A. Bataille, J. Rault, P. Le F` evre, F. Bertran, and S. Andrieu, Physical Review Applied11, 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.064009 (2019)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.11.064009 2019

  36. [43]

    J. N. Solano Cordova,Temperature dependent spin wave study of magnetic properties and spin-polarized electron transport in Fe1-xVx and Co2MnSi epitaxial films, Theses, Universit´ e de Strasbourg (2024)

    2024

  37. [44]

    C. O. Amorim, F. Mohseni, R. K. Dumas, V. S. Amaral, and J. S. Amaral, Measurement Science and Technology32, 105602 (2021)

    2021

  38. [45]

    Solano, O

    J. Solano, O. Gladii, P. Kuntz, Y. Henry, D. Halley, and M. Bailleul, Physical Review Materials6, 124409 (2022)

    2022

  39. [46]

    de Melo, C

    C. de Melo, C. Guillemard, A. M. Friedel, V. Palin, J. C. Rojas-S´ anchez, S. Petit-Watelot, and S. Andrieu, Applied Materials Today25, 101174 (2021)

    2021

  40. [47]

    Garate, K

    I. Garate, K. Gilmore, M. D. Stiles, and A. H. MacDonald, Physical Review B79, 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.104416 (2009). 12

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.79.104416 2009

  41. [48]

    Kambersk´ y, Czechoslovak Journal of Physics B26, 1366 (1976)

    V. Kambersk´ y, Czechoslovak Journal of Physics B26, 1366 (1976)

    1976

  42. [49]

    Haidar,Role of surfaces in magnetization dynamics and spin polarized transport : a spin wave study, Ph.D

    M. Haidar,Role of surfaces in magnetization dynamics and spin polarized transport : a spin wave study, Ph.D. thesis, Universit´ e de Strasbourg (2012), th` ese de doctorat dirig´ ee par Bailleul, Matthieu Physique Strasbourg 2012

    2012

  43. [50]

    Haidar, M

    M. Haidar, M. Bailleul, M. Kostylev, and Y. Lao, Phys. Rev. B89, 094426 (2014)

    2014

  44. [51]

    Bailleul and J.-Y

    M. Bailleul and J.-Y. Chauleau, inSpin Wave Confinement: Propagating Waves, Second Edition, edited by S. O. Demokri- tov (Pan Stanford Publishing, 2017) second edition ed

    2017

  45. [52]

    Vlaminck,D´ ecalage Doppler d’ondes de spin induit par un courant ´ electrique, Ph.D

    V. Vlaminck,D´ ecalage Doppler d’ondes de spin induit par un courant ´ electrique, Ph.D. thesis, Universit´ e Louis Pasteur (Strasbourg) (1971-2008) (2008)

    1971