pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.06802 · v1 · pith:SVHKQME4new · submitted 2026-06-05 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA · astro-ph.HE

Radiation Pressure Instability in the "turn-on" Changing-Look AGN SDSS J1430+2303

Han He , Bei You , Marzena \'Sniegowska , Bo\.zena Czerny This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 22:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.HE
keywords changing-look AGNradiation pressure instabilityaccretion diskSDSS J1430+2303multi-wavelength variabilityX-ray timing analysisSeyfert 1.2Eddington ratio
0
0 comments X

The pith

Radiation pressure instabilities in the accretion disk drive the decaying light curves observed in SDSS J1430+2303.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies the changing-look AGN SDSS J1430+2303 after its optical flux rose by an order of magnitude and its spectrum shifted from Seyfert 1.9 to 1.2. In the high state the optical, UV and X-ray light curves show repeated decaying segments whose amplitudes steadily decrease. Timing analysis finds a fixed break frequency and hard lag near 10 to the minus 4 Hz, while spectral fits give a black-hole mass between 4.7 and 19.5 times 10 to the 7 solar masses, an Eddington ratio of 0.024 to 0.046, and high spin. The authors link the damping light-curve segments to radiation-pressure instabilities that shrink the unstable zone inside the disk.

Core claim

We propose that the observed multi-wavelength decaying periods and damping amplitudes are associated with a shrinking unstable zone, driven by radiation pressure instabilities within the accretion disk.

What carries the argument

Radiation pressure instability inside the accretion disk that produces a shrinking unstable zone whose changing size accounts for the observed damping amplitudes.

If this is right

  • The low Eddington ratio (0.024-0.046) is the regime in which radiation-pressure instability can operate and produce the observed damping.
  • High black-hole spin (a greater than or equal to 0.86) is required for the disk conditions that sustain the unstable zone.
  • The stable disk-corona geometry inferred from timing allows the instability to remain the dominant driver of variability as luminosity falls.
  • The same mechanism can account for the progressive shortening of the decaying periods.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar damping patterns may appear in other low-Eddington-ratio changing-look AGNs if their disks also develop radiation-pressure unstable zones.
  • Continued monitoring could test whether the unstable zone continues to shrink after the current observations end.
  • The model implies a specific relation between the rate of amplitude damping and the rate of luminosity decline that future multi-wavelength campaigns could check.

Load-bearing premise

Constant break frequency and hard lag at 10 to the minus 4 Hz during the luminosity drop mean the disk-corona geometry stays fixed, allowing radiation-pressure instability to set the light-curve shape.

What would settle it

A clear change in break frequency or hard lag during the luminosity decline, or amplitudes that fail to damp in step with a shrinking unstable zone, would contradict the instability interpretation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.06802 by Bei You, Bo\.zena Czerny, Han He, Marzena \'Sniegowska.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The broad-band light curves of SDSS J1430. (A) The optical light curves in the g- and r-bands from ZTF and WHUT. The green and red circles show ZTF photometry in the g- and r-bands. The yellow and magenta squares represent the WHUT photometry in the g- and r-bands. Note that the r-band magnitudes are shifted by 0.8 mag for visualization purposes. (B) The X-ray light curves in 0.2-15 keV from XMM-PN (blue s… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Four models of X-ray spectral fitting for SDSS J1430 from the first XMM-PN observation with Obs. ID 0893810201. In each panel, black points denote the unfolded XMM-PN spectrum, and the red solid line represents the best-fitting model. The lower sub-panel of each panel shows the data-to-model ratio, with black points indicating the ratio and the magenta solid line marking ratio=1. In panels (B)-(D), the blu… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The time lags between 0.2–0.5 keV and 0.5–10 keV as a function of temporal frequency. Positive lags in￾dicate that the hard band lags behind the soft band. (A) Lag-frequency spectrum derived from the brightest observa￾tion. (B) Lag-frequency spectrum obtained by combining the five fainter observations to improve the SNR. The gray dashed lines represent lag=0. 10 0 10 1 energy (keV) 100 0 100 200 300 400 50… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The lag-energy spectrum in the low frequency range [0.8−5.0]×10−4 Hz for the brightest observation (A), and [1.5−4.0]×10−3 Hz for the combined fainter observations (B). Positive lags indicate that the hard band lags behind the soft band. The gray dashed lines represent lag=0. 59580 59600 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 59760 59780 59800 Time (MJD) q [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Temporal evolution of the soft excess strength q [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Optical spectral fitting of SDSS J1430 for the DESI spectrum. The upper panel shows the full rest-frame spectrum. The black points represent the de-redshifted data. The magenta line represents the best-fitting model. The cyan and orange lines show the host galaxy component and the AGN power-law continuum, respectively. The lower panels show zoom-in views of the Hβ and Hα regions after subtracting the host … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Broadband SED fitting of the accretion disk model to the optical, UV, and X-ray data of SDSSJ1430, ˜ assuming MBH = 108 M⊙ and a = 0.998. The red line rep￾resents the best fitting model, and the magenta line shows the best fitting model without Galactic extinction tbabs. The blue, green, and pink dashed lines represent the disk blackbody, soft Comptonization, and hard Comptonization components, respectivel… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Same to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Results of the radiation pressure instability model for SDSS J1430. All time axes show relative time with respect to the start of the simulation. (A) Observed g− and r−band light curves from ZTF. Note that the r−band magnitudes are shifted by 0.8 mag for visualization purposes. (B) Predicted evolution of the accretion rate of ADAF mod￾ulated by the radiation pressure instability. (C) Temporal evolution of… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a multi-wavelength study of the changing-look AGN SDSS J1430+2303. The optical flux increased by an order of magnitude over four years, driving a spectral transition from Seyfert 1.9 to 1.2. During the brightened high state, optical, UV, and X-ray light curves exhibited rapid decaying periods with progressively decreasing amplitudes. X-ray spectral analysis reveals a remarkably weak soft excess which declines more steeply than the hard X-rays as the total luminosity decreases. X-ray timing analysis shows a constant break frequency and a hard lag at $\sim 10^{-4}$ Hz during the luminosity decline, indicating a stable disk-corona geometry. Further broad-band spectral energy distribution fitting constrains the black hole mass to the range $M_{\rm BH}=4.7-19.5\times10^7\rm M_\odot$, corresponding to an Eddington ratio to $L/L_{\rm Edd}\sim0.024 - 0.046$, and favors a high spin ($a\gtrsim 0.86$). Consequently, we propose that the observed multi-wavelength decaying periods and damping amplitudes are associated with a shrinking unstable zone, driven by radiation pressure instabilities within the accretion disk.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents multi-wavelength observations of the changing-look AGN SDSS J1430+2303, documenting an order-of-magnitude rise in optical flux over four years that drives a spectral transition from Seyfert 1.9 to 1.2. In the high state, optical/UV/X-ray light curves exhibit decaying periods with progressively smaller amplitudes. X-ray spectra show a weak soft excess that declines more steeply than the hard X-rays; timing analysis finds constant break frequency and hard lag at ~10^{-4} Hz, taken to indicate stable disk-corona geometry. Broadband SED fitting yields M_BH = 4.7–19.5 × 10^7 M_⊙, L/L_Edd ≈ 0.024–0.046, and a ≳ 0.86. The authors propose that the observed decaying periods and damping amplitudes arise from a shrinking unstable zone driven by radiation-pressure instabilities in the accretion disk.

Significance. If the quantitative link between the timing data and the shrinking-zone model can be established, the result would supply rare observational evidence for radiation-pressure instability operating at low Eddington ratio and would offer a concrete mechanism for the turn-on phase of changing-look AGN. The multi-wavelength light-curve coverage and the reported constancy of the X-ray timing properties are clear strengths of the dataset.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract (final paragraph) and timing analysis section] Abstract (final paragraph) and timing analysis section: The central claim requires that radiation-pressure instability produces a shrinking unstable zone whose multi-wavelength signatures match the decaying periods and damping amplitudes. This interpretation is tied to the X-ray timing result of constant break frequency and hard lag at ~10^{-4} Hz, which is used to infer stable disk-corona geometry. However, a shrinking unstable zone (altering the radial extent or thermal structure of the radiation-pressure-dominated region) would be expected to modify the characteristic timescales or propagation delays that set the break frequency and lag, unless the unstable zone is entirely decoupled from the X-ray emitting corona in a manner that is not demonstrated.
  2. [Abstract (SED fitting paragraph)] Abstract (SED fitting paragraph): The derived Eddington ratio range L/L_Edd ∼ 0.024–0.046 is low. Radiation-pressure instability is expected to operate only where radiation pressure dominates, which at these accretion rates occupies a narrow radial range; the manuscript does not show how an unstable zone of sufficient size and radial extent can exist and produce the observed multi-wavelength decaying periods while leaving the X-ray timing signal unchanged.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that SED fitting 'favors a high spin (a ≳ 0.86)' but does not list the model components, priors, or goodness-of-fit metrics used to obtain the mass, Eddington ratio, and spin constraints.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments, which help clarify the interpretation of our results. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract (final paragraph) and timing analysis section] Abstract (final paragraph) and timing analysis section: The central claim requires that radiation-pressure instability produces a shrinking unstable zone whose multi-wavelength signatures match the decaying periods and damping amplitudes. This interpretation is tied to the X-ray timing result of constant break frequency and hard lag at ~10^{-4} Hz, which is used to infer stable disk-corona geometry. However, a shrinking unstable zone (altering the radial extent or thermal structure of the radiation-pressure-dominated region) would be expected to modify the characteristic timescales or propagation delays that set the break frequency and lag, unless the unstable zone is entirely decoupled from the X-ray emitting corona in a manner that is not demonstrated.

    Authors: We agree that the link between the shrinking unstable zone and the unchanged X-ray timing properties requires clearer justification. Our interpretation rests on the observational result that the break frequency and hard lag remain constant at ~10^{-4} Hz while optical/UV amplitudes damp, which we take as indicating that the corona's characteristic scales are unaffected. We posit that the instability primarily influences larger radii contributing to the optical/UV, leaving the inner corona stable. We will revise the timing analysis and discussion sections to explicitly address the radial separation and the assumption of decoupling. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract (SED fitting paragraph)] Abstract (SED fitting paragraph): The derived Eddington ratio range L/L_Edd ∼ 0.024–0.046 is low. Radiation-pressure instability is expected to operate only where radiation pressure dominates, which at these accretion rates occupies a narrow radial range; the manuscript does not show how an unstable zone of sufficient size and radial extent can exist and produce the observed multi-wavelength decaying periods while leaving the X-ray timing signal unchanged.

    Authors: The SED-derived Eddington ratios of 0.024–0.046 are indeed low, and we recognize that the radiation-pressure-dominated region is expected to be radially limited at these rates. The manuscript does not provide a quantitative model of the unstable zone's extent or a calculation demonstrating how a narrow zone produces the observed damping while preserving X-ray timing. We will add a paragraph in the discussion explicitly noting this limitation and outlining why the multi-wavelength signatures can still be consistent with a compact unstable region that does not alter the inner corona. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: interpretive proposal from independent timing and SED data

full rationale

The paper reports X-ray timing (constant break frequency and hard lag) and SED fitting (BH mass, Eddington ratio, spin) as direct observational constraints. These are used to motivate an interpretive proposal linking decaying periods to a shrinking radiation-pressure unstable zone. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are shown that make the proposal equivalent to its inputs by construction. The timing result is presented as evidence for stable geometry, and the instability link is a hypothesis, not a derived prediction that reduces to the fit. This is a standard non-circular interpretive step.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard accretion-disk theory and observationally fitted parameters; no new entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Black hole mass = 4.7-19.5 x 10^7 M_sun
    Range 4.7-19.5 x 10^7 solar masses obtained from SED fitting and used to compute Eddington ratio.
  • Eddington ratio = 0.024-0.046
    Derived value 0.024-0.046 that places the source in the regime where radiation-pressure instability is expected.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Radiation pressure instability can develop in accretion disks at low-to-moderate Eddington ratios and produce a shrinking unstable zone.
    Invoked in the final sentence of the abstract to explain the observed decaying periods.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5770 in / 1478 out tokens · 30861 ms · 2026-06-27T22:11:31.790398+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 82 canonical work pages · 9 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    2020, ApJL, 890, L29, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab7306

    Ai, Y., Dou, L., Yang, C., et al. 2020, ApJL, 890, L29, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab7306

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab7306 2020

  2. [2]

    2022, A&A, 663, A139, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243821 Ar´ evalo, P., & Uttley, P

    An, T., Zhang, Y., Wang, A., et al. 2022, A&A, 663, A139, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243821 Ar´ evalo, P., & Uttley, P. 2006, MNRAS, 367, 801, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.09989.x

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243821 2022

  3. [3]

    C., Kulkarni, S

    Bellm, E. C., Kulkarni, S. R., Graham, M. J., et al. 2019, PASP, 131, 018002, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aaecbe

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aaecbe 2019

  4. [4]

    2009, A&A, 495, 421, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200810620

    Bianchi, S., Guainazzi, M., Matt, G., Fonseca Bonilla, N., & Ponti, G. 2009, A&A, 495, 421, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200810620

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200810620 2009

  5. [5]

    2016, A&A, 588, A70, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526982

    Boissay, R., Ricci, C., & Paltani, S. 2016, A&A, 588, A70, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526982

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526982 2016

  6. [6]

    2022, astropy/photutils: 1.6.0, 1.6.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7419741

    Bradley, L., Sip˝ ocz, B., Robitaille, T., et al. 2022, astropy/photutils: 1.6.0, 1.6.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7419741

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.7419741 2022

  7. [7]

    A., Landsman , W., Holland , S

    Breeveld, A. A., Landsman, W., Holland, S. T., et al. 2011, in American Institute of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 1358, Gamma Ray Bursts 2010, ed. J. E. McEnery, J. L. Racusin, & N. Gehrels (AIP), 373–376, doi: 10.1063/1.3621807

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3621807 2011

  8. [8]

    doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021.102557 , eprint =

    Cackett, E. M., Bentz, M. C., & Kara, E. 2021, iScience, 24, 102557, doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102557

    work page doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021.102557 2021

  9. [9]

    , keywords =

    Cackett, E. M., Horne, K., & Winkler, H. 2007, MNRAS, 380, 669, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12098.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12098.x 2007

  10. [10]

    2023, MNRAS, 526, 3273, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2597

    Cappellari, M. 2023, MNRAS, 526, 3273, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2597

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2597 2023

  11. [11]

    C., & et al

    Chambers, K. C., & et al. 2017, VizieR Online Data Catalog: The Pan-STARRS release 1 (PS1) Survey - DR1 (Chambers+, 2016), VizieR On-line Data Catalog: II/349. Originally published in: 2016arXiv161205560C; 2016arXiv161205240M; 2016arXiv161205245W; 2016arXiv161205244M; 2016arXiv161205242M; 2016arXiv161205243F

    2017

  12. [12]

    The Pan-STARRS1 Surveys

    Chambers, K. C., Magnier, E. A., Metcalfe, N., et al. 2016, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1612.05560, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1612.05560

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1612.05560 2016

  13. [13]

    , keywords =

    Crummy, J., Fabian, A. C., Gallo, L., & Ross, R. R. 2006, MNRAS, 365, 1067, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09844.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09844.x 2006

  14. [14]

    2011, A&A, 525, L8, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201016025

    Czerny, B., & Hryniewicz, K. 2011, A&A, 525, L8, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201016025

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201016025 2011

  15. [15]

    The DESI Experiment Part I: Science,Targeting, and Survey Design

    Deng, L., Yang, F., Chen, X., et al. 2021, Nature, 596, 353, doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03711-z DESI Collaboration, Aghamousa, A., Aguilar, J., et al. 2016, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1611.00036, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1611.00036 DESI Collaboration, Abareshi, B., Aguilar, J., et al. 2022, AJ, 164, 207, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac882b DESI Collaboration, Adame, A. G., ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03711-z 2021

  16. [16]

    , keywords =

    Done, C., Davis, S. W., Jin, C., Blaes, O., & Ward, M. 2012, MNRAS, 420, 1848, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19779.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19779.x 2012

  17. [17]

    2023, MNRAS, 518, 4172, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3344

    Dotti, M., Bonetti, M., Rigamonti, F., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 4172, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3344

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3344 2023

  18. [18]

    2022, A&A, 665, L3, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244450

    Dou, L., Jiang, N., Wang, T., et al. 2022, A&A, 665, L3, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244450

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244450 2022

  19. [19]

    2020, A&A, 636, A73, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936817

    Duras, F., Bongiorno, A., Ricci, F., et al. 2020, A&A, 636, A73, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936817

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936817 2020

  20. [20]

    C., Zoghbi, A., Ross, R

    Fabian, A. C., Zoghbi, A., Ross, R. R., et al. 2009, Nature, 459, 540, doi: 10.1038/nature08007

    work page doi:10.1038/nature08007 2009

  21. [21]

    A., Magnier , E

    Flewelling, H. A., Magnier, E. A., Chambers, K. C., et al. 2020, ApJS, 251, 7, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abb82d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abb82d 2020

  22. [22]

    2004, ApJ, 611, 1005, doi: 10.1086/422091

    Gehrels, N., Chincarini, G., Giommi, P., et al. 2004, ApJ, 611, 1005, doi: 10.1086/422091

    work page doi:10.1086/422091 2004

  23. [23]

    C., Arzoumanian, Z., Adkins, P

    Gendreau, K. C., Arzoumanian, Z., Adkins, P. W., et al. 2016, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9905, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2016: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray, ed. J.-W. A. den Herder, T. Takahashi, & M. Bautz, 99051H, doi: 10.1117/12.2231304

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2231304 2016

  24. [24]

    , keywords =

    George, I. M., & Fabian, A. C. 1991, MNRAS, 249, 352, doi: 10.1093/mnras/249.2.352

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/249.2.352 1991

  25. [25]

    2022, ApJ, 937, 31, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac887e Gierli´ nski, M., & Done, C

    Ghosh, R., Laha, S., Deshmukh, K., et al. 2022, ApJ, 937, 31, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac887e Gierli´ nski, M., & Done, C. 2004, MNRAS, 349, L7, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07687.x

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac887e 2022

  26. [26]

    E., & Ho, L

    Greene, J. E., & Ho, L. C. 2005, ApJ, 630, 122, doi: 10.1086/431897

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/431897 2005

  27. [27]

    2018, PyQSOFit: Python code to fit the spectrum of quasars, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1809.008

    Guo, H., Shen, Y., & Wang, S. 2018, PyQSOFit: Python code to fit the spectrum of quasars, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1809.008. http://ascl.net/1809.008

    2018

  28. [28]

    L., et al

    Guo, W.-J., Zou, H., Greenwell, C. L., et al. 2025, ApJS, 278, 28, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/adc124

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/adc124 2025

  29. [29]

    2021, MNRAS, 508, 144, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2550

    Guolo, M., Ruschel-Dutra, D., Grupe, D., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 144, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2550

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2550 2021

  30. [30]

    , keywords =

    Guy, J., Bailey, S., Kremin, A., et al. 2023, AJ, 165, 144, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/acb212

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/acb212 2023

  31. [31]

    Dynamic disk-corona coupling during the state transition of Swift J1727.8-1613

    He, H., Long, Y., You, B., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.01384, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2508.01384 HI4PI Collaboration, Ben Bekhti, N., Fl¨ oer, L., et al. 2016, A&A, 594, A116, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629178

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.01384 2025

  32. [32]

    2024, PASJ, 76, 103, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psad083

    Hoshi, A., Yamada, T., & Ohta, K. 2024, PASJ, 76, 103, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psad083

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psad083 2024

  33. [33]

    , keywords =

    Huppenkothen, D., Bachetti, M., Stevens, A. L., et al. 2019, ApJ, 881, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab258d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab258d 2019

  34. [34]

    R., et al

    Husemann, B., Urrutia, T., Tremblay, G. R., et al. 2016, A&A, 593, L9, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629245

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629245 2016

  35. [35]

    2026, A&A, 707, A213, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202556654

    Jana, A., Ricci, C., Tortosa, A., et al. 2026, A&A, 707, A213, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202556654

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556654 2026

  36. [36]

    2001, A&A, 365, L1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20000036

    Jansen, F., Lumb, D., Altieri, B., et al. 2001, A&A, 365, L1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20000036

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20000036 2001

  37. [37]

    2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2201.11633, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2201.11633

    Jiang, N., Yang, H., Wang, T., et al. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2201.11633, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2201.11633

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2201.11633 2022

  38. [38]

    , keywords =

    Jin, C., Ward, M., Done, C., & Gelbord, J. 2012, MNRAS, 420, 1825, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19805.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19805.x 2012

  39. [39]

    J., Haggard, D., et al

    Jin, X., Ruan, J. J., Haggard, D., et al. 2021, ApJ, 912, 20, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abeb17

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abeb17 2021

  40. [40]

    M., Reynolds, C., & Dai, L

    Kara, E., Miller, J. M., Reynolds, C., & Dai, L. 2016, Nature, 535, 388, doi: 10.1038/nature18007

    work page doi:10.1038/nature18007 2016

  41. [41]

    , keywords =

    Kolehmainen, M., Done, C., & D´ ıaz Trigo, M. 2011, MNRAS, 416, 311, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19040.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19040.x 2011

  42. [42]

    2026, Advances in Space Research, 77, 4041, doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2025.04.058

    Komossa, S., Grupe, D., Marziani, P., et al. 2026, Advances in Space Research, 77, 4041, doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2025.04.058

    work page doi:10.1016/j.asr.2025.04.058 2026

  43. [43]

    , keywords =

    Kotov, O., Churazov, E., & Gilfanov, M. 2001, MNRAS, 327, 799, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04769.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04769.x 2001

  44. [44]

    M., Cales, S., Moran, E

    LaMassa, S. M., Cales, S., Moran, E. C., et al. 2015, ApJ, 800, 144, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/800/2/144

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/800/2/144 2015

  45. [45]

    , keywords =

    Laor, A. 1991, ApJ, 376, 90, doi: 10.1086/170257

    work page doi:10.1086/170257 1991

  46. [46]

    P., & Eardley, D

    Lightman, A. P., & Eardley, D. M. 1974, ApJL, 187, L1, doi: 10.1086/181377

    work page doi:10.1086/181377 1974

  47. [47]

    Linear theory

    Loska, Z., Czerny, B., & Szczerba, R. 2004, MNRAS, 355, 1080, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08387.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08387.x 2004

  48. [48]

    2021, MNRAS, 506, 4188, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1581

    Lyu, B., Yan, Z., Yu, W., & Wu, Q. 2021, MNRAS, 506, 4188, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1581

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1581 2021

  49. [49]

    L., Ross, N

    MacLeod, C. L., Ross, N. P., Lawrence, A., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 457, 389, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2997

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2997 2016

  50. [50]

    , keywords =

    Magdziarz, P., Blaes, O. M., Zdziarski, A. A., Johnson, W. N., & Smith, D. A. 1998, MNRAS, 301, 179, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.02015.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.02015.x 1998

  51. [51]

    2023, A&A, 673, A126, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346115

    Marin, F., Hutsem´ ekers, D., Liodakis, I., et al. 2023, A&A, 673, A126, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346115

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346115 2023

  52. [52]

    J., Laher, R

    Masci, F. J., Laher, R. R., Rusholme, B., et al. 2019, PASP, 131, 018003, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aae8ac

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aae8ac 2019

  53. [53]

    R., et al

    Masterson, M., Kara, E., Pasham, D. R., et al. 2023, ApJL, 945, L34, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acbea9

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acbea9 2023

  54. [54]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Miller, L., Turner, T. J., & Reeves, J. N. 2008, A&A, 483, 437, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200809590

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200809590 2008

  55. [55]

    J., Bagri, D

    Napier, P. J., Bagri, D. S., Clark, B. G., et al. 1994, IEEE Proceedings, 82, 658, doi: 10.1109/5.284733

    work page doi:10.1109/5.284733 1994

  56. [56]

    Narayan, I

    Narayan, R., & Yi, I. 1994, ApJL, 428, L13, doi: 10.1086/187381

    work page doi:10.1086/187381 1994

  57. [57]

    2000, ApJL, 530, L65, doi: 10.1086/312491

    Nicastro, F. 2000, ApJL, 530, L65, doi: 10.1086/312491

    work page doi:10.1086/312491 2000

  58. [58]

    2018, MNRAS, 480, 3898, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2032

    Noda, H., & Done, C. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 3898, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2032

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2032 2018

  59. [59]

    K., Schawinski, K., et al

    Oh, K., Yi, S. K., Schawinski, K., et al. 2015, ApJS, 219, 1, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/219/1/1 16

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/219/1/1 2015

  60. [60]

    2021, ApJ, 910, 97, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe766

    Pan, X., Li, S.-L., & Cao, X. 2021, ApJ, 910, 97, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe766

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abe766 2021

  61. [61]

    2013, A&A, 549, A73, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219956

    Petrucci, P.-O., Paltani, S., Malzac, J., et al. 2013, A&A, 549, A73, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219956

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219956 2013

  62. [62]

    E., Rees, M

    Pringle, J. E., Rees, M. J., & Pacholczyk, A. G. 1973, A&A, 29, 179

    1973

  63. [63]

    2024, ApJ, 974, 153, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6e76

    Ren, W., Guo, H., Shen, Y., et al. 2024, ApJ, 974, 153, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6e76

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6e76 2024

  64. [64]

    2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 1282, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-02108-4

    Ricci, C., & Trakhtenbrot, B. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 1282, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-02108-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-023-02108-4 2023

  65. [65]

    Roming, P. W. A., Kennedy, T. E., Mason, K. O., et al. 2005, SSRv, 120, 95, doi: 10.1007/s11214-005-5095-4

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1007/s11214-005-5095-4 2005

  66. [66]

    , keywords =

    Ross, R. R., & Fabian, A. C. 2005, MNRAS, 358, 211, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08797.x R´ o˙ za´ nska, A., Malzac, J., Belmont, R., Czerny, B., &

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08797.x 2005

  67. [67]

    2015, A&A, 580, A77, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526288

    Petrucci, P.-O. 2015, A&A, 580, A77, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526288

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526288 2015

  68. [68]

    J., Finkbeiner , D

    Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525, doi: 10.1086/305772

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/305772 1998

  69. [69]

    , keywords =

    Shakura, N. I., & Sunyaev, R. A. 1973, A&A, 24, 337 —. 1976, MNRAS, 175, 613, doi: 10.1093/mnras/175.3.613

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/175.3.613 1973

  70. [70]

    B., Horne, K., et al

    Shen, Y., Hall, P. B., Horne, K., et al. 2019, ApJS, 241, 34, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab074f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab074f 2019

  71. [71]

    2020, A&A, 641, A167, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038575

    Sniegowska, M., Czerny, B., Bon, E., & Bon, N. 2020, A&A, 641, A167, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038575

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038575 2020

  72. [72]

    From truck to optical fibre: the coming-of-age of eVLBI

    Szomoru, A., Biggs, A., Garrett, M., et al. 2004, in European VLBI Network on New Developments in VLBI Science and Technology, ed. R. Bachiller, F. Colomer, J.-F. Desmurs, & P. de Vicente, 257–260, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0412686

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0412686 2004

  73. [73]

    J., & Miller, L

    Turner, T. J., & Miller, L. 2009, A&A Rv, 17, 47, doi: 10.1007/s00159-009-0017-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-009-0017-1 2009

  74. [74]

    J., Miller, L., Reeves, J

    Turner, T. J., Miller, L., Reeves, J. N., & Kraemer, S. B. 2007, A&A, 475, 121, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20077947

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20077947 2007

  75. [75]

    Wilkins, D. R. 2014, A&A Rv, 22, 72, doi: 10.1007/s00159-014-0072-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-014-0072-0 2014

  76. [76]

    2025, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol

    Valencic, L., Tanner, R., & Weaver, K. 2025, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 245, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #245, 471.07

    2025

  77. [77]

    V., Mushotzky, R

    Vasudevan, R. V., Mushotzky, R. F., Reynolds, C. S., et al. 2014, ApJ, 785, 30, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/785/1/30

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/785/1/30 2014

  78. [78]

    W., et al

    Wang, J., Jin, S., Xu, D. W., et al. 2026, ApJ, 1002, 85, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae592c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae592c 2026

  79. [79]

    2024, ApJ, 961, 172, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad147d

    Ward, C., Gezari, S., Nugent, P., et al. 2024, ApJ, 961, 172, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad147d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad147d 2024

  80. [80]

    On the Absorption of X-rays in the Interstellar Medium

    Wilms, J., Allen, A., & McCray, R. 2000, ApJ, 542, 914, doi: 10.1086/317016

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/317016 2000

Showing first 80 references.