pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.07197 · v1 · pith:WZS4NDCYnew · submitted 2026-06-05 · ❄️ cond-mat.dis-nn · cond-mat.stat-mech

On the true low-energy excitations of the three-dimensional spin glass

Claudio Chilin , Enzo Marinari , V\'ictor Mart\'in-Mayor , Giorgio Parisi , Juan J. Ruiz-Lorenzo , David Yllanes This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 20:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.dis-nn cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords spin glasslow-energy excitationsreplica symmetry breakingoverlap equivalenceMonte Carlo simulationthree dimensionsfractal dimensionParisi-Toulouse scaling
0
0 comments X

The pith

Monte Carlo data on three-dimensional spin glasses extrapolates to zero temperature and confirms the overlap-equivalence hypothesis while favoring replica-symmetry breaking for the fractal dimension of excitations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper carries out large-scale Monte Carlo simulations of the three-dimensional Edwards-Anderson spin glass on lattices as large as L=18. It reports that both the energy and the link overlap extrapolate smoothly from finite temperature to zero temperature and match earlier ground-state computations. The fractal dimension extracted from the excitations is best described by replica-symmetry breaking, although the TNT picture is also examined. The overlap distribution P(q) obeys the Parisi-Toulouse temperature scaling, and the entire data set is presented as a strong confirmation of the overlap-equivalence hypothesis.

Core claim

Finite-temperature Monte Carlo simulations on the three-dimensional spin glass yield smooth extrapolations to zero temperature that agree with ground-state results for energy and link overlap; the fractal dimension of the excitations is best fit by replica-symmetry breaking theory, the overlap distribution satisfies Parisi-Toulouse scaling, and the data provide a spectacular confirmation of the overlap-equivalence hypothesis.

What carries the argument

The overlap-equivalence hypothesis, which asserts that different overlap measures (spin overlap and link overlap) are equivalent for characterizing the low-energy excitations.

If this is right

  • Replica-symmetry breaking supplies the correct description of low-energy excitations in the three-dimensional spin glass.
  • The TNT alternative is disfavored by the measured fractal dimension.
  • Different overlap definitions can be used interchangeably because of overlap equivalence.
  • The Parisi-Toulouse scaling relation for the overlap distribution holds at all temperatures down to zero.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Finite-temperature methods may become the practical route for studying still larger systems where direct ground-state searches remain infeasible.
  • The same extrapolation strategy could be tested on other disordered models where replica-symmetry breaking is conjectured.
  • If overlap equivalence is general, then any convenient overlap observable can serve as a proxy in future studies of excitation structure.

Load-bearing premise

Finite-temperature Monte Carlo data can be extrapolated smoothly and without uncontrolled systematic bias to zero temperature, allowing direct comparison with ground-state results.

What would settle it

A ground-state computation on comparable or larger lattices that yields a fractal dimension of the excitations lying well outside the extrapolated confidence interval obtained from the finite-temperature data.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.07197 by Claudio Chilin, David Yllanes, Enzo Marinari, Giorgio Parisi, Juan J. Ruiz-Lorenzo, V\'ictor Mart\'in-Mayor.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Parisi-Toulouse scaling. Temperature and size dependence for the cumu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Link overlap as a function of q 2 . Plot of E(ql |q 2 ), see Eq. (7), as com￾puted for the lowest temperatures and for the biggest sizes we have simulated. In both panels errors are computed using a jackknife method. Left: estimate of E(ql |q 2 ) for L = 14, 16, 18 at T = 0.2. Right: estimate of E(ql |q 2 ) for L = 16 at various temperatures. The inset shows a closeup of the highlighted box. However, altho… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Extrapolating E(ql |q 2 ) to q 2 = 0. Through the procedure explained in Sec. 3.2 we get interpolated data points for equally spaced temperatures 0.2 ≤ T < 0.3. Left: E(ql |q 2 ) at T = 0.2 for different linear sizes L. Dots repre￾sent the measurements, dashed lines are fits to a linear function, solid lines are fits to a quadratic function. In order to get cleaner results, fits have been restricted to the… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Taking the successive L → ∞ and T → 0 limits. Left: E(ql |q 2 = 0) for T = 0.2 as a function of 1/L. The dashed line is the fit of these points to Eq. (20). The resulting parameters, along with the goodness-of-fit metrics, are reported in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Energy density as a function of T. Plot of our extrapolations for the thermodynamic limit of the energy density e∞(T) obtained at fixed T from the fit to Eq. (24). The grey dashed line is a fit to Eq. (27), the corresponding values and accuracy parameters are reported in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Link overlap ql conditioned to q 2 at different stages of equilibration. Left: Comparison of a single-sample 〈ql |q 2 〉 = 〈ql δq 2,c 2 〉/〈δq 2,c 2 〉 between bin 0 (second half of the simulation, equilibrated) and bin 3 (second sixteenth of the simulation, off equilibrium) at T = 0.2. Right: Sample-averaged conditional expectation E(ql |q 2 ), Eq. (7), as a function of q 2 , as computed for T = Tmin = 0.2 a… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study the low-energy excitations of the three dimensional spin glass through a large-scale Monte Carlo simulation on lattices up to $L=18$. We find smooth extrapolations down to zero temperature, which, in the case of the energy and of the link overlap, can be directly -- and favourably -- compared with previous investigations featuring ground states (i.e., at zero temperature). The best fit for the fractal dimension of the excitations is provided by Replica-Symmetry Breaking theory, but we also consider the alternative TNT description. The $P(q)$ is found to verify the Parisi-Toulouse temperature scaling. Our data provides a spectacular confirmation of the overlap-equivalence hypothesis.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports large-scale Monte Carlo simulations of the three-dimensional Edwards-Anderson spin glass on lattices up to L=18. Finite-temperature data are extrapolated to T=0 for the energy, link overlap, and fractal dimension of low-energy excitations; these extrapolations are stated to be smooth and to compare favorably with prior ground-state computations. The fractal dimension is reported to be best fit by replica-symmetry-breaking (RSB) theory (with TNT also considered), the overlap distribution P(q) is found to obey Parisi-Toulouse scaling, and the results are presented as a spectacular confirmation of the overlap-equivalence hypothesis.

Significance. If the T→0 extrapolations can be shown to be free of uncontrolled systematic bias from fitting choices and sub-leading corrections, the work would supply direct numerical evidence distinguishing RSB from TNT descriptions of excitations and would strengthen the overlap-equivalence picture in three-dimensional spin glasses. The scale of the simulations (L≤18) and the explicit comparison to independent zero-temperature data are positive features that would make the result a useful benchmark if the extrapolation robustness is established.

major comments (2)
  1. [extrapolation procedure and fractal-dimension analysis] The central claim of a 'spectacular confirmation' of overlap equivalence and the preference for RSB over TNT rests on the T→0 extrapolations of energy, link overlap, and excitation fractal dimension. The manuscript provides no quantitative assessment of sensitivity to the choice of fitting form, possible sub-leading corrections, or consistency across independent observables (abstract and results on extrapolations).
  2. [fractal dimension results] The statement that RSB supplies the 'best fit' for the fractal dimension requires specification of the fitting protocol, reported χ² or equivalent goodness-of-fit metrics, and error bars on the extracted dimension so that the statistical preference over the TNT value can be evaluated (fractal-dimension results).
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract would be strengthened by a brief mention of the number of disorder samples and the range of temperatures simulated.
  2. Notation for the link overlap and the precise definition of the excitation fractal dimension should be introduced with an equation in the methods section for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address the major points below and will incorporate additional quantitative analyses in a revised version to strengthen the presentation of the extrapolation results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [extrapolation procedure and fractal-dimension analysis] The central claim of a 'spectacular confirmation' of overlap equivalence and the preference for RSB over TNT rests on the T→0 extrapolations of energy, link overlap, and excitation fractal dimension. The manuscript provides no quantitative assessment of sensitivity to the choice of fitting form, possible sub-leading corrections, or consistency across independent observables (abstract and results on extrapolations).

    Authors: We agree that a more detailed quantitative assessment of extrapolation robustness would improve the manuscript. In the revision we will add explicit checks on the sensitivity of the T→0 limits to the choice of fitting ansatz (including forms with and without sub-leading corrections), report the variation in extrapolated values under different protocols, and demonstrate consistency of the extrapolated energy, link overlap, and fractal dimension with each other and with the independent zero-temperature data already cited. These additions will directly address concerns about uncontrolled systematic bias. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [fractal dimension results] The statement that RSB supplies the 'best fit' for the fractal dimension requires specification of the fitting protocol, reported χ² or equivalent goodness-of-fit metrics, and error bars on the extracted dimension so that the statistical preference over the TNT value can be evaluated (fractal-dimension results).

    Authors: We will revise the relevant section to specify the precise fitting protocol employed for the fractal dimension (including the functional form, range of system sizes, and weighting), report the χ² per degree of freedom (or equivalent metric) for both the RSB and TNT fits, and include error bars on the extracted dimension obtained from the covariance matrix of the fit. This will allow a direct statistical comparison of the two descriptions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; central claims rest on direct Monte Carlo data and extrapolations

full rationale

The paper reports results from large-scale Monte Carlo simulations (L≤18) with smooth T→0 extrapolations for energy, link overlap, fractal dimension, and P(q). These are compared to prior ground-state computations and to theoretical expectations from RSB versus TNT. The 'best fit' statement is a post-hoc model comparison on simulation outputs, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction or a self-definitional loop. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to the paper's own inputs or to an unverified self-citation chain. The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks (prior T=0 data and independent theory predictions).

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are identifiable from the abstract; the work rests on standard Monte Carlo sampling and established spin-glass scaling hypotheses.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5661 in / 1072 out tokens · 32270 ms · 2026-06-27T20:29:31.549608+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Scalable Physics-Inspired Transformers for Spin Glasses

    cond-mat.dis-nn 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A physics-inspired transformer with sparse attention and FlashAttention enables up to 100x faster sampling of large spin-glass systems, providing distributions, free energies, and overlaps for SK and EA models where p...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    J. A. Mydosh, Spin Glasses: an Experimental Introduction, Taylor and Francis, London (1993)

    1993

  2. [2]

    A. P. Young, Spin Glasses and Random Fields, World Scientific, Singapore, doi:10.1142/3517 (1998)

    work page doi:10.1142/3517 1998

  3. [3]

    M \'e zard, G

    M. M \'e zard, G. Parisi and M. Virasoro, Spin-Glass Theory and Beyond, World Scientific, Singapore, doi:10.1142/0271 (1987)

    work page doi:10.1142/0271 1987

  4. [4]

    Charbonneau, E

    P. Charbonneau, E. Marinari, M. M\'ezard, G. Parisi, F. Ricci-Tersenghi, G. Sicuro and F. Zamponi, eds., Spin Glass Theory and Far Beyond, World Sientific, doi:10.1142/13341 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1142/13341 2023

  5. [5]

    Dahlberg, I

    E. Dahlberg, I. González-Adalid Pemartín, E. Marinari, V. Martin-Mayor, J. Moreno-Gordo, R. Orbach, I. Paga, G. Parisi, F. Ricci-Tersenghi, J. Ruiz-Lorenzo and D. Yllanes, Spin-glass dynamics: experiment, theory and simulation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 97, 045005 (2025), doi:10.1103/ctp2-zwyr

    work page doi:10.1103/ctp2-zwyr 2025

  6. [6]

    Parisi, Infinite number of order parameters for spin-glasses, Phys

    G. Parisi, Infinite number of order parameters for spin-glasses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1754 (1979), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.43.1754

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.43.1754 1979

  7. [7]

    Parisi, The order parameter for spin glasses: a function on the interval 0-1, J

    G. Parisi, The order parameter for spin glasses: a function on the interval 0-1, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 13, 1101 (1980), doi:10.1088/0305-4470/13/3/042

    work page doi:10.1088/0305-4470/13/3/042 1980

  8. [8]

    Parisi, Order parameter for spin glasses, Phys

    G. Parisi, Order parameter for spin glasses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1946 (1983), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.1946

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.50.1946 1946

  9. [9]

    M \'e zard, G

    M. M \'e zard, G. Parisi, N. Sourlas, G. Toulouse and M. Virasoro, Nature of the spin-glass phase, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1156 (1984), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.1156

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.52.1156 1984

  10. [10]

    Parisi, Nobel lecture: Multiple equilibria, Rev

    G. Parisi, Nobel lecture: Multiple equilibria, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 030501 (2023), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.95.030501

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.95.030501 2023

  11. [11]

    Guerra and F

    F. Guerra and F. L. Toninelli, The thermodynamic limit in mean field spin glass models, Communications in Mathematical Physics 230(1), 71 (2002), doi:10.1007/s00220-002-0699-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s00220-002-0699-y 2002

  12. [12]

    Guerra, Broken replica symmetry bounds in the mean field spin glass model, Comm

    F. Guerra, Broken replica symmetry bounds in the mean field spin glass model, Comm. Math. Phys. 233, 1 (2003), doi:10.1007/s00220-002-0773-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s00220-002-0773-5 2003

  13. [13]

    Talagrand, The P arisi formula , Ann

    M. Talagrand, The P arisi formula , Ann. of Math. 163, 221 (2006), doi:10.4007/annals.2006.163.221

    work page doi:10.4007/annals.2006.163.221 2006

  14. [14]

    Panchenko, The P arisi ultrametricity conjecture , Ann

    D. Panchenko, The P arisi ultrametricity conjecture , Ann. of Math. 177, 383 (2013), doi:10.4007/annals.2013.177.1.8

    work page doi:10.4007/annals.2013.177.1.8 2013

  15. [15]

    D. S. Fisher and D. A. Huse, Equilibrium behavior of the spin-glass ordered phase, Phys. Rev. B 38, 386 (1988), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.38.386

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.38.386 1988

  16. [16]

    C. M. Newman and D. L. Stein, G round S tate E xcitations and E nergy F luctuations in S hort- R ange S pin G lasses , Unpublished (2025), arXiv:2510.27507 https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.27507

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    W. L. McMillan, S caling theory of I sing spin glasses , J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 17, 3179 (1984), doi:10.1088/0022-3719/17/18/010

    work page doi:10.1088/0022-3719/17/18/010 1984

  18. [18]

    A. J. Bray and M. A. Moore, Scaling theory of the ordered phase of spin glasses, In J. L. van Hemmen and I. Morgenstern, eds., Heidelberg Colloquium on Glassy Dynamics, no. 275 in Lecture Notes in Physics. Springer, Berlin (1987)

    1987

  19. [19]

    C. M. Newman and D. L. Stein, Multiple states and thermodynamic limits in short-ranged ising spin-glass models, Phys. Rev. B 46, 973 (1992), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.46.973

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.46.973 1992

  20. [20]

    C. M. Newman and D. L. Stein, Spatial inhomogeneity and thermodynamic chaos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4821 (1996), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.4821

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.76.4821 1996

  21. [21]

    C. M. Newman and D. L. Stein, Metastate approach to thermodynamic chaos, Phys. Rev. E 55, 5194 (1997), doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.55.5194

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.55.5194 1997

  22. [22]

    C. M. Newman and D. L. Stein, Simplicity of state and overlap structure in finite-volume realistic spin glasses, Phys. Rev. E 57, 1356 (1998), doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.57.1356

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.57.1356 1998

  23. [23]

    Aizenman and J

    M. Aizenman and J. Wehr, Rounding effects of quenched randomness on first-order phase transitions, Communications in Mathematical Physics 130(3), 489 (1990), doi:10.1007/BF02096933

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02096933 1990

  24. [24]

    Krzakala and O

    F. Krzakala and O. C. Martin, Spin and link overlaps in three-dimensional spin glasses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3013 (2000), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3013

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.3013 2000

  25. [25]

    Palassini and A

    M. Palassini and A. P. Young, Nature of the spin glass state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3017 (2000), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3017

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.3017 2000

  26. [26]

    C. M. Newman and D. L. Stein, Ground-state stability and the nature of the spin glass phase, Phys. Rev. E 105, 044132 (2022), doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.105.044132

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.105.044132 2022

  27. [27]

    Read, Short-range ising spin glasses: The metastate interpretation of replica symmetry breaking, Phys

    N. Read, Short-range ising spin glasses: The metastate interpretation of replica symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. E 90, 032142 (2014), doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.90.032142

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.90.032142 2014

  28. [28]

    Arguin, C

    L.-P. Arguin, C. M. Newman and D. L. Stein, Thermodynamic identities and symmetry breaking in short-range spin glasses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 187202 (2015), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.187202

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.187202 2015

  29. [29]

    C. M. Newman and D. L. Stein, Critical droplets and replica symmetry breaking, Front. Phys. 12, 1473378 (2024), doi:10.3389/fphy.2024.1473378

    work page doi:10.3389/fphy.2024.1473378 2024

  30. [30]

    Billoire, L

    A. Billoire, L. A. Fernandez, A. Maiorano, E. Marinari, V. Martin-Mayor, J. Moreno-Gordo, G. Parisi, F. Ricci-Tersenghi and J. J. Ruiz-Lorenzo, Numerical construction of the A izenman- W ehr metastate , Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 037203 (2017), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.037203

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.037203 2017

  31. [31]

    Q. Zhai, V. Martin-Mayor, D. L. Schlagel, G. G. Kenning and R. L. Orbach, Slowing down of spin glass correlation length growth: Simulations meet experiments, Phys. Rev. B 100, 094202 (2019), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.100.094202

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.100.094202 2019

  32. [32]

    I. Paga, J. He, M. Baity-Jesi, E. Calore, A. Cruz, L. A. Fernandez, J. M. Gil-Narvion, I. Gonzalez-Adalid Pemartin, A. Gordillo-Guerrero, D. I\ niguez, A. Maiorano, E. Marinari et al., Quantifying memory in spin glasses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 256704 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.256704

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.256704 2024

  33. [33]

    M. Shen, G. Ortiz, Y.-Y. Liu, M. Weigel and Z. Nussinov, Universal fragility of spin glass ground states under single bond changes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 247101 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.247101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.247101 2024

  34. [34]

    Marinari and G

    E. Marinari and G. Parisi, Effects of a bulk perturbation on the ground state of 3d ising spin glasses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3887 (2001), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.3887

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.3887 2001

  35. [35]

    Marinari and G

    E. Marinari and G. Parisi, Effects of changing the boundary conditions on the ground state of ising spin glasses, Phys. Rev. B 62, 11677 (2000), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.62.11677

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.62.11677 2000

  36. [36]

    Contucci, C

    P. Contucci, C. Giardin\`a, C. Giberti and C. Vernia, Overlap equivalence in the edwards-anderson model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 217204 (2006), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.217204

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.217204 2006

  37. [37]

    Alvarez Ba \ n os, A

    R. Alvarez Ba \ n os, A. Cruz, L. A. Fernandez, J. M. Gil-Narvion, A. Gordillo-Guerrero, M. Guidetti, A. Maiorano, F. Mantovani, E. Marinari, V. Mart\' i n-Mayor, J. Monforte-Garcia, A. Mu \ n oz Sudupe et al., Nature of the spin-glass phase at experimental length scales, J. Stat. Mech. 2010, P06026 (2010), doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2010/06/P06026

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2010/06/p06026 2010

  38. [38]

    Palassini, F

    M. Palassini, F. Liers, M. Juenger and A. P. Young, Low-energy excitations in spin glasses from exact ground states, Phys. Rev. B 68, 064413 (2003), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.68.064413

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.68.064413 2003

  39. [39]

    H. G. Katzgraber, M. Palassini and A. P. Young, Monte carlo simulations of spin glasses at low temperatures, Phys. Rev. B 63, 184422 (2001), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.63.184422

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.63.184422 2001

  40. [40]

    Parisi and G

    G. Parisi and G. Toulouse, A simple hypothesis for the spin glass phase of the infinite-ranged SK model , Journal de Physique Lettres 41(15), L361 (1980), doi:10.1051/jphyslet:019800041015036100

    work page doi:10.1051/jphyslet:019800041015036100 1980

  41. [41]

    Marinari, G

    E. Marinari, G. Parisi and J. J. Ruiz-Lorenzo, Low T dynamical properties of spin glasses smoothly extrapolate to T = 0 , Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 35(32), 6805 (2002), doi:10.1088/0305-4470/35/32/303

    work page doi:10.1088/0305-4470/35/32/303 2002

  42. [42]

    Baity-Jesi, R

    M. Baity-Jesi, R. A. Ba\ n os, A. Cruz, L. A. Fernandez, J. M. Gil-Narvion, A. Gordillo-Guerrero, D. Iniguez, A. Maiorano, F. Mantovani, E. Marinari, V. Mart\' i n-Mayor, J. Monforte-Garcia et al., Janus II : a new generation application-driven computer for spin-system simulations , Comp. Phys. Comm 185, 550 (2014), doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2013.10.019

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2013.10.019 2014

  43. [43]

    J. Houdayer, A cluster monte carlo algorithm for 2-dimensional spin glasses, The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems 22(4), 479 (2001), doi:10.1007/PL00011151

    work page doi:10.1007/pl00011151 2001

  44. [44]

    Z. Zhu, A. J. Ochoa and H. G. Katzgraber, Efficient cluster algorithm for spin glasses in any space dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 077201 (2015), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.077201

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.077201 2015

  45. [45]

    Chilin, E

    C. Chilin, E. Marinari, V. Martín-Mayor, G. Parisi, J. J. Ruiz-Lorenzo and D. Yllanes, Cluster moves with an entropic reservoir accelerate low-temperature simulations of three-dimensional spin glasses (2026), arXiv:2605.25872 https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.25872

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  46. [46]

    S. F. Edwards and P. W. Anderson, Theory of spin glasses, Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics 5, 965 (1975), doi:10.1088/0305-4608/5/5/017

    work page doi:10.1088/0305-4608/5/5/017 1975

  47. [47]

    S. F. Edwards and P. W. Anderson, Theory of spin glasses. II , J. Phys. F 6(10), 1927 (1976), doi:10.1088/0305-4608/6/10/022

    work page doi:10.1088/0305-4608/6/10/022 1927

  48. [48]

    Marinari, G

    E. Marinari, G. Parisi and J. J. Ruiz-Lorenzo, Phase structure of the three-dimensional E dwards- A nderson spin glass , Phys. Rev. B 58, 14852 (1998), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.58.14852

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.58.14852 1998

  49. [49]

    Baity-Jesi, R

    M. Baity-Jesi, R. A. Ba\ n os, A. Cruz, L. A. Fernandez, J. M. Gil-Narvion, A. Gordillo-Guerrero, D. Iniguez, A. Maiorano, F. Mantovani, E. Marinari, V. Mart\' i n-Mayor, J. Monforte-Garcia et al., Critical parameters of the three-dimensional I sing spin glass , Phys. Rev. B 88, 224416 ( 2013 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.88.224416

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.88.224416 2013

  50. [50]

    L. A. Fern\'andez, V. Martin-Mayor, G. Parisi and B. Seoane, Spin glasses on the hypercube, Phys. Rev. B 81, 134403 (2010), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.81.134403

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.81.134403 2010

  51. [51]

    Bray and M

    A. Bray and M. Moore, Metastable states in spin glasses, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 13(19), L469 (1980), doi:10.1088/0022-3719/13/19/002

    work page doi:10.1088/0022-3719/13/19/002 1980

  52. [52]

    Hukushima and K

    K. Hukushima and K. Nemoto, E xchange M onte C arlo method and application to spin glass simulations , J. Phys. Soc. Japan 65, 1604 (1996), doi:10.1143/JPSJ.65.1604

    work page doi:10.1143/jpsj.65.1604 1996

  53. [53]

    Marinari, O ptimized M onte C arlo methods , In J

    E. Marinari, O ptimized M onte C arlo methods , In J. Kerst\'esz and I. Kondor, eds., Advances in Computer Simulation. Springer-Verlag, doi:10.1007/BFb0105459 (1998)

    work page doi:10.1007/bfb0105459 1998

  54. [54]

    Marinari, G

    E. Marinari, G. Parisi, F. Ricci-Tersenghi, J. J. Ruiz-Lorenzo and F. Zuliani, Replica symmetry breaking in short-range spin glasses: Theoretical foundations and numerical evidences, J. Stat. Phys. 98, 973 (2000), doi:10.1023/A:1018607809852

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1018607809852 2000

  55. [55]

    Yllanes, Rugged Free-Energy Landscapes in Disordered Spin Systems, Ph.D

    D. Yllanes, Rugged Free-Energy Landscapes in Disordered Spin Systems, Ph.D. thesis, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (2011), arXiv:1111.0266 https://arxiv.org/abs/1111.0266

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  56. [56]

    W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in C, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, second edn. (1992)

    1992

  57. [57]

    K. F. Pál, The ground state of the cubic spin glass with short-range interactions of gaussian distribution, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 233(1), 60 (1996), doi:10.1016/S0378-4371(96)00241-5

    work page doi:10.1016/s0378-4371(96)00241-5 1996

  58. [58]

    F. Romá, S. Risau-Gusman, A. Ramirez-Pastor, F. Nieto and E. Vogel, The ground state energy of the edwards–anderson spin glass model with a parallel tempering monte carlo algorithm, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 388(14), 2821 (2009), doi:10.1016/j.physa.2009.03.036

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physa.2009.03.036 2009

  59. [59]

    S. Boettcher, Physics of the edwards–anderson spin glass in dimensions d = 3, … ,8 from heuristic ground state optimization, Frontiers in Physics Volume 12 - 2024 (2024), doi:10.3389/fphy.2024.1466987

    work page doi:10.3389/fphy.2024.1466987 2024

  60. [60]

    D. J. Thouless, P. W. Anderson and R. G. Palmer, Solution of 'solvable model of a spin glass', Phil. Mag. 35(3), 593 (1977), doi:10.1080/14786437708235992

    work page doi:10.1080/14786437708235992 1977

  61. [61]

    Parisi, Toward a mean field theory for spin glasses, Phys

    G. Parisi, Toward a mean field theory for spin glasses, Phys. Lett. 73A, 203 (1979), doi:10.1016/0375-9601(79)90708-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9601(79)90708-4 1979

  62. [62]

    H. G. Katzgraber and F. Krzakala, Temperature and disorder chaos in three-dimensional ising spin glasses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 017201 (2007), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.017201

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.017201 2007

  63. [63]

    Bernaschi, C

    M. Bernaschi, C. Chilin, L. A. Fernandez, I. González-Adalid Pemartín, E. Marinari, V. Martin-Mayor, G. Parisi, F. Ricci-Tersenghi, J. J. Ruiz-Lorenzo and D. Yllanes, Microcanonical simulated annealing: Massively parallel monte carlo simulations with sporadic random-number generation, Comp. Phys. Comm. 325, 110182 (2026), doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2026.110182

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2026.110182 2026