New Exotic Operators in the Spectrum of Wilson Lines in General Representations

Carlo Meneghelli; Daniele Artico; Michele Savi; Rudolfs Treilis

arxiv: 2606.07738 · v1 · pith:SD3FK2F4new · submitted 2026-06-05 · ✦ hep-th · math-ph· math.MP

New Exotic Operators in the Spectrum of Wilson Lines in General Representations

Daniele Artico , Carlo Meneghelli , Michele Savi , Rudolfs Treilis This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 20:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th math-phmath.MP

keywords Wilson linesN=4 SYMdefect deformationsmarginally relevantdisplacement supermultipletOPE coefficientshalf-BPS linesfour-point function

0 comments

The pith

Wilson lines in sufficiently rich representations support new exotic operator insertions that induce marginally relevant deformations of the defect theory.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that Wilson lines in gauge theories, when the representation is sufficiently rich, admit a broad new class of operator insertions on the line. In the half-BPS case within N=4 super Yang-Mills, a subset of these operators carry the same quantum numbers as the displacement supermultiplet. The dimension-one superprimaries serve as deformations of the associated defect theory. Relating the beta functions of these deformations to particular OPE coefficients demonstrates that the deformations are marginally relevant. This conclusion is corroborated by a perturbative calculation of the four-point function involving these operators, which holds for general gauge groups and representations.

Core claim

We show that, in sufficiently rich representations, they support a large new class of operator insertions. For half-BPS lines in N=4 SYM many of these operators have the quantum numbers of the displacement supermultiplet. Their dimension-one superprimaries define natural deformations of the defect theory. By analyzing the associated beta functions, and relating them to specific OPE coefficients, we show that the deformations are marginally relevant. We support our finding with a weak-coupling computation of the four-point function of these operators for any gauge group and representation.

What carries the argument

The dimension-one superprimaries of the new operator insertions that match displacement supermultiplet quantum numbers on half-BPS Wilson lines, whose beta functions are fixed by specific OPE coefficients.

If this is right

The defect theory admits a family of marginally relevant deformations controlled by OPE data.
These deformations can be studied perturbatively for any gauge group and representation via the four-point function.
The operator spectrum on the Wilson line enlarges substantially once the representation is rich enough.
The beta-function analysis directly links the relevance to concrete OPE coefficients.
Many of the new operators share quantum numbers with the displacement supermultiplet.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The marginally relevant deformations could drive the defect theory toward a new infrared fixed point whose properties remain to be explored.
The construction of these exotic operators may extend to non-supersymmetric or non-BPS Wilson lines in other gauge theories.
Higher-point correlation functions of the new operators could be computed to test consistency of the marginal relevance beyond four points.
The same OPE-coefficient relation might be used to classify relevant deformations in other defect setups or lower-dimensional theories.

Load-bearing premise

The relation between the beta functions of the deformations and specific OPE coefficients captures the leading marginal relevance without higher-order corrections or representation-dependent anomalies that would alter the sign or relevance of the flow.

What would settle it

A next-to-leading-order computation of the beta function for one such deformation in a concrete rich representation that finds the linear coefficient to have the opposite sign from the claimed relevance.

read the original abstract

Wilson lines are fundamental probes of gauge theories. We show that, in sufficiently rich representations, they support a large new class of operator insertions. For half-BPS lines in $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM many of these operators have the quantum numbers of the displacement supermultiplet. Their dimension-one superprimaries define natural deformations of the defect theory. By analyzing the associated beta functions, and relating them to specific OPE coefficients, we show that the deformations are marginally relevant. We support our finding with a weak-coupling computation of the four-point function of these operators for any gauge group and representation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper identifies a new class of Wilson-line operators whose superprimaries give marginally relevant deformations, supported by an explicit weak-coupling four-point function for general groups and representations.

read the letter

The core advance is the claim that sufficiently rich representations allow a large family of operator insertions on Wilson lines. In N=4 SYM many of these match the displacement supermultiplet, and their dimension-one superprimaries are shown to produce marginally relevant deformations via beta-function analysis tied to OPE coefficients extracted from the four-point function.

The calculation itself is the strongest part: a weak-coupling four-point function that holds for arbitrary gauge group and representation. That supplies concrete OPE data rather than relying on symmetry arguments alone, and it directly feeds the beta-function sign.

The soft spot is the usual one for leading-order perturbative results. The marginal-relevance conclusion rests on the sign of the beta function at this order; higher-order corrections or representation-specific effects could in principle alter it. The stress-test note correctly flags this as the least secure step, and the paper does not appear to include a next-to-leading check that would close the issue.

The work is aimed at people already working on line defects, displacement multiplets, and RG flows in supersymmetric gauge theories. A reader who needs concrete deformations to study will get usable output from the OPE coefficients and the general-representation setup.

It has enough explicit computation and a clear new claim to deserve referee time rather than a desk rejection.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims that Wilson lines in sufficiently rich representations admit a large new class of operator insertions. For half-BPS lines in N=4 SYM, many of these operators carry the quantum numbers of the displacement supermultiplet; their dimension-one superprimaries define natural deformations of the defect CFT. By relating the associated beta functions to specific OPE coefficients extracted from a weak-coupling four-point function, the authors conclude that these deformations are marginally relevant. The four-point function computation is stated to hold for arbitrary gauge group and representation.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work identifies a broad new family of marginally relevant defect deformations in N=4 SYM and potentially in other gauge theories, enlarging the space of RG flows that can be studied around Wilson-line defects. The explicit weak-coupling four-point function for general groups and representations is a concrete technical contribution that could be reusable.

major comments (1)

[Beta-function analysis] Beta-function analysis (the section relating beta functions to OPE coefficients): the conclusion of marginal relevance rests on the sign of the leading-order beta function being determined by the OPE coefficients computed at weak coupling. The manuscript does not address whether higher-order perturbative corrections, representation-dependent anomalies, or non-perturbative effects could reverse this sign for general gauge groups and representations; this assumption is load-bearing for the relevance claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of the significance of our results and for the detailed comment. We respond point-by-point below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Beta-function analysis] Beta-function analysis (the section relating beta functions to OPE coefficients): the conclusion of marginal relevance rests on the sign of the leading-order beta function being determined by the OPE coefficients computed at weak coupling. The manuscript does not address whether higher-order perturbative corrections, representation-dependent anomalies, or non-perturbative effects could reverse this sign for general gauge groups and representations; this assumption is load-bearing for the relevance claim.

Authors: Our analysis is performed strictly in the weak-coupling regime. The beta function for the defect deformation begins at leading order in the 't Hooft coupling, and this leading term controls the RG flow for sufficiently small coupling; higher-order perturbative corrections enter at higher powers of the coupling and are parametrically suppressed, so they cannot alter the sign in the weak-coupling limit. Our four-point function computation is valid for arbitrary gauge group and representation, and no representation-dependent anomalies appear in the calculation. Non-perturbative effects lie outside the perturbative framework and are not addressed here. We will add a brief clarifying paragraph on the scope of the perturbative claim. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation uses independent four-point function

full rationale

The paper's central result—that dimension-one superprimaries define marginally relevant deformations—is obtained by relating beta functions to OPE coefficients, with the relation supported by an explicit weak-coupling computation of the four-point function of these operators for arbitrary gauge group and representation. This computation is presented as external supporting evidence rather than a tautological re-expression of the beta-function analysis. No self-definitional mappings, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation chain. The four-point function supplies independent content, rendering the overall argument self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are stated. The work relies on standard representation theory of gauge groups and the known structure of half-BPS lines in N=4 SYM.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Standard representation theory of compact gauge groups and the classification of half-BPS Wilson lines in N=4 SYM
Invoked to define 'sufficiently rich representations' and the displacement supermultiplet quantum numbers.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5633 in / 1409 out tokens · 31215 ms · 2026-06-27T20:57:06.308855+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 26 linked inside Pith

[1]

Another possibility is to explore large-charge/Dynkin-label limits [41], where the path integral may be treated by saddle-point methods

and applied in [39, 40]. Another possibility is to explore large-charge/Dynkin-label limits [41], where the path integral may be treated by saddle-point methods. Finally, one could extend the analysis of this letter and express theζ 5 correction to the beta function in terms of six-point correlators. For a generic representation, the number of deformation...

2023
[2]

K. G. Wilson, Phys. Rev. D10, 2445 (1974)

1974
[3]

Y. M. Makeenko and A. A. Migdal, Phys. Lett. B88, 135 (1979), [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 89, 437 (1980)]

1979
[4]

A. M. Polyakov, Nucl. Phys. B164, 171 (1980)

1980
[5]

J. M. Maldacena, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 4859 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9803002

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[6]

Drukker and S

N. Drukker and S. Kawamoto, JHEP07, 024 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0604124

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[7]

Their two-point functions are then pos- itive or negative definite, respectively, and the OPE co- efficients are real withC O1O2O3 =s 1s2s3CO2O1O3, see [46, 47]

We choose a definite-parity basis for DCFT operators, with parity-even operators real and parity-odd operators purely imaginary. Their two-point functions are then pos- itive or negative definite, respectively, and the OPE co- efficients are real withC O1O2O3 =s 1s2s3CO2O1O3, see [46, 47]
[8]

Cavagli` a, N

A. Cavagli` a, N. Gromov, and M. Preti, JHEP02, 026 (2025), arXiv:2312.11604 [hep-th]

arXiv 2025
[9]

The AdS/C-P-TCorrespondence,

J. Gomis, “The AdS/C-P-TCorrespondence,” (2025), arXiv:2507.12467 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[10]

See [48] for a review of the relevant supermultiplets
[11]

Forsu(N), this leaves only the k-th symmetric and a-th antisymmetric repre- sentations

It is commutative exactly when the weight-space decom- position ofRis multiplicity-free. Forsu(N), this leaves only the k-th symmetric and a-th antisymmetric repre- sentations
[12]

Kirillov, Pages620, 1079 (2000)

A. Kirillov, Pages620, 1079 (2000)

2000
[13]

Hausel, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences121, e2319341121 (2024)

T. Hausel, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences121, e2319341121 (2024)

2024
[14]

Drukker and J

N. Drukker and J. Plefka, JHEP04, 052 (2009), arXiv:0901.3653 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[15]

Liendo and C

P. Liendo and C. Meneghelli, JHEP01, 122 (2017), arXiv:1608.05126 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[16]

Giombi and S

S. Giombi and S. Komatsu, JHEP05, 109 (2018), [Erra- tum: JHEP 11, 123 (2018)], arXiv:1802.05201 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[17]

Cachazo, M

F. Cachazo, M. R. Douglas, N. Seiberg, and E. Witten, JHEP12, 071 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0211170

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002
[18]

Grant, P

L. Grant, P. A. Grassi, S. Kim, and S. Minwalla, JHEP 05, 049 (2008), arXiv:0803.4183 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[19]

Chang and X

C.-M. Chang and X. Yin, Phys. Rev. D88, 106005 (2013), arXiv:1305.6314 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[20]

Green, Z

D. Green, Z. Komargodski, N. Seiberg, Y. Tachikawa, and B. Wecht, JHEP06, 106 (2010), arXiv:1005.3546 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[21]

Komargodski and D

Z. Komargodski and D. Simmons-Duffin, J. Phys. A50, 154001 (2017), arXiv:1603.04444 [hep-th]

arXiv 2017
[22]

Behan, L

C. Behan, L. Rastelli, S. Rychkov, and B. Zan, J. Phys. A50, 354002 (2017), arXiv:1703.05325 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[23]

Behan, JHEP03, 127 (2018), arXiv:1709.03967 [hep- th]

C. Behan, JHEP03, 127 (2018), arXiv:1709.03967 [hep- th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[25]

Notice that (C 2 B1[2,0])(ij)kℓ = 2(C 2 B1[2,0]+)ijkℓ where A(ij) =A ij +A ji
[26]

Gabai, A

B. Gabai, A. Sever, and D.-l. Zhong, Phys. Rev. D112, 065004 (2025), arXiv:2501.06900 [hep-th]

arXiv 2025
[27]

Girault, M

B. Girault, M. F. Paulos, and P. van Vliet, (2025), arXiv:2509.26561 [hep-th]

arXiv 2025
[28]

Drukker, Z

N. Drukker, Z. Kong, and P. Kravchuk, (2025), arXiv:2512.15913 [hep-th]

arXiv 2025
[29]

Belton and Z

J. Belton and Z. Kong, JHEP05, 103 (2026), arXiv:2510.08519 [hep-th]

arXiv 2026
[30]

Equivalently this can be rewritten asC 0iO +C i0O = 0∀ Oof typeB 1[2,0]
[31]

This can be done sinceβ (0,I) = 0 and∂ ζ(0,J) β(i,I) = 0
[32]

The additional symme- tryT ijkℓ =T ikjℓ amounts to a crossing-type relation for these OPE coefficients

The tensorT=C 2 B1[2,0]+, satisfiesT ijkℓ =T jikℓ =T kℓij as is manifest from its definition (13) and the parity-even nature of the exchanged operators. The additional symme- tryT ijkℓ =T ikjℓ amounts to a crossing-type relation for these OPE coefficients. While a general proof is not yet available, we have checked this identity at leading order in pertur...
[33]

Ferrero and C

P. Ferrero and C. Meneghelli, Phys. Rev. D104, L081703 (2021), arXiv:2103.10440 [hep-th]

arXiv 2021
[34]

Artico, J

D. Artico, J. Barrat, and G. Peveri, JHEP02, 190 (2025), arXiv:2410.08271 [hep-th]

arXiv 2025
[35]

This implies that the integration produces boundary terms that we can evaluate in terms of OPE coefficients; a similar mechanism takes place in [49]
[36]

This is- sue is resolved by considering a perturbative mixing be- tween ΦI and Φ6

Some care is needed as the limitg 2 Y M →0 does not com- mute with removing the short-distance regulator because of terms of the formϵ ∆(g2 Y M )−1 with ∆(0) = 1. This is- sue is resolved by considering a perturbative mixing be- tween ΦI and Φ6. This mechanism is essentially discussed in [25, 50]
[37]

Artico, C

D. Artico, C. Meneghelli, M. Savi, and R. Treilis, to appear
[38]

A similar multitude of operators with the same quan- tum numbers as the displacement supermultiplets exists for half-BPS defects in the 6d, (2,0) theory, see [51]
[39]

Polchinski and J

J. Polchinski and J. Sully, JHEP10, 059 (2011), arXiv:1104.5077 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[40]

Beccaria, S

M. Beccaria, S. Giombi, and A. A. Tseytlin, J. Phys. A 55, 255401 (2022), arXiv:2202.00028 [hep-th]

arXiv 2022
[41]

Castiglioni, S

L. Castiglioni, S. Penati, M. Tenser, and D. Trancanelli, JHEP08, 106 (2023), arXiv:2211.16501 [hep-th]

arXiv 2023
[42]

Aharony, G

O. Aharony, G. Cuomo, Z. Komargodski, M. Mezei, and A. Raviv-Moshe, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 151601 (2023), arXiv:2211.11775 [hep-th]

arXiv 2023
[43]

Chang and Y.-H

C.-M. Chang and Y.-H. Lin, (2024), arXiv:2402.10129 [hep-th]

arXiv 2024
[44]

Bonetti and C

F. Bonetti and C. Meneghelli, (2025), arXiv:2506.15678 [hep-th]

arXiv 2025
[45]

For a recent study of the relation between continuous deformations and conformal manifolds see [52]
[46]

Gomis and F

J. Gomis and F. Passerini, JHEP08, 074 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0604007

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[47]

Homrich, J

A. Homrich, J. Penedones, J. Toledo, B. C. van Rees, and P. Vieira, JHEP11, 076 (2019), arXiv:1905.06905 [hep- th]

arXiv 2019
[48]

Qiao and S

J. Qiao and S. Rychkov, JHEP12, 119 (2017), arXiv:1709.00008 [hep-th]. 6

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[50]

Y. Chen, S. Colin-Ellerin, O. Mamroud, and K. Pa- padodimas, (2026), arXiv:2604.23287 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[51]

Cavagli` a, N

A. Cavagli` a, N. Gromov, J. Julius, and M. Preti, JHEP 05, 164 (2022), arXiv:2203.09556 [hep-th]

arXiv 2022
[52]

Meneghelli and M

C. Meneghelli and M. Tr´ epanier, JHEP07, 165 (2023), arXiv:2212.05020 [hep-th]

arXiv 2023
[53]

Komatsu, Y

S. Komatsu, Y. Kusuki, M. Meineri, and H. Ooguri, (2025), arXiv:2512.11045 [hep-th]. Appendix A: Hilbert series The Hilbert seriesH R(x) =P k≥0 dim(Mk)xk counts the number of weight-khalf-BPS operators. The coefficients dim(Mk) are integers, which are also equal to the number of times the trivial representation1appears in the tensor productR⊗ ¯R⊗Sym k(Adj...

arXiv 2025
[54]

Here, we will determine♯by comparison with the known result for the fundamental Wilson line forsu(N)

can be fixed by looking at the standard SUSY transformations preserved by the line, see for example the conventions in [14]. Here, we will determine♯by comparison with the known result for the fundamental Wilson line forsu(N). Now we are ready to compute the relevant two point functions. For the primaries one finds ⟨O(i) 1 (Φ6(t1))O(j) 1 (Φ6(t2))⟩(0) = g2...
[55]

Okubo and H

S. Okubo and H. Myung, Hadronic J.4, 199 (1981)

1981
[56]

A. M. Perelomov and V. S. Popov, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat.32, 1368 (1968)

1968
[57]

Yangians and classical lie algebras,

A. Molev, M. Nazarov, and G. Olshanskii, “Yangians and classical lie algebras,” (1994), arXiv:hep-th/9409025 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994
[58]

Beisert, C

N. Beisert, C. Kristjansen, J. Plefka, G. W. Semenoff, and M. Staudacher, Nucl. Phys. B650, 125 (2003), arXiv:hep- th/0208178

arXiv 2003
[59]

Drukker and J

N. Drukker and J. Plefka, JHEP04, 001 (2009), arXiv:0812.3341 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[60]

N. I. Usyukina and A. I. Davydychev, Phys. Lett. B332, 159 (1994), arXiv:hep-ph/9402223

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994
[61]

N. I. Usyukina and A. I. Davydychev, Phys. Lett. B348, 503 (1995), arXiv:hep-ph/9412356

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995
[62]

Liendo, C

P. Liendo, C. Meneghelli, and V. Mitev, JHEP10, 077 (2018), arXiv:1806.01862 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[63]

Anselmi, Nucl

D. Anselmi, Nucl. Phys. B541, 369 (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9809192

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
[64]

A. V. Belitsky, J. Henn, C. Jarczak, D. Mueller, and E. Sokatchev, Phys. Rev. D77, 045029 (2008), arXiv:0707.2936 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[65]

Rychkov and Z

S. Rychkov and Z. M. Tan, J. Phys. A48, 29FT01 (2015), arXiv:1505.00963 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[66]

L. F. Alday and J. Maldacena, JHEP11, 068 (2007), arXiv:0710.1060 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[67]

Ferrero and C

P. Ferrero and C. Meneghelli, JHEP05, 090 (2024), arXiv:2312.12550 [hep-th]

arXiv 2024
[68]

Cooke, A

M. Cooke, A. Dekel, and N. Drukker, J. Phys. A50, 335401 (2017), arXiv:1703.03812 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

[1] [1]

Another possibility is to explore large-charge/Dynkin-label limits [41], where the path integral may be treated by saddle-point methods

and applied in [39, 40]. Another possibility is to explore large-charge/Dynkin-label limits [41], where the path integral may be treated by saddle-point methods. Finally, one could extend the analysis of this letter and express theζ 5 correction to the beta function in terms of six-point correlators. For a generic representation, the number of deformation...

2023

[2] [2]

K. G. Wilson, Phys. Rev. D10, 2445 (1974)

1974

[3] [3]

Y. M. Makeenko and A. A. Migdal, Phys. Lett. B88, 135 (1979), [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 89, 437 (1980)]

1979

[4] [4]

A. M. Polyakov, Nucl. Phys. B164, 171 (1980)

1980

[5] [5]

J. M. Maldacena, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 4859 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9803002

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

[6] [6]

Drukker and S

N. Drukker and S. Kawamoto, JHEP07, 024 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0604124

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

[7] [7]

Their two-point functions are then pos- itive or negative definite, respectively, and the OPE co- efficients are real withC O1O2O3 =s 1s2s3CO2O1O3, see [46, 47]

We choose a definite-parity basis for DCFT operators, with parity-even operators real and parity-odd operators purely imaginary. Their two-point functions are then pos- itive or negative definite, respectively, and the OPE co- efficients are real withC O1O2O3 =s 1s2s3CO2O1O3, see [46, 47]

[8] [8]

Cavagli` a, N

A. Cavagli` a, N. Gromov, and M. Preti, JHEP02, 026 (2025), arXiv:2312.11604 [hep-th]

arXiv 2025

[9] [9]

The AdS/C-P-TCorrespondence,

J. Gomis, “The AdS/C-P-TCorrespondence,” (2025), arXiv:2507.12467 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

[10] [10]

See [48] for a review of the relevant supermultiplets

[11] [11]

Forsu(N), this leaves only the k-th symmetric and a-th antisymmetric repre- sentations

It is commutative exactly when the weight-space decom- position ofRis multiplicity-free. Forsu(N), this leaves only the k-th symmetric and a-th antisymmetric repre- sentations

[12] [12]

Kirillov, Pages620, 1079 (2000)

A. Kirillov, Pages620, 1079 (2000)

2000

[13] [13]

Hausel, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences121, e2319341121 (2024)

T. Hausel, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences121, e2319341121 (2024)

2024

[14] [14]

Drukker and J

N. Drukker and J. Plefka, JHEP04, 052 (2009), arXiv:0901.3653 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

[15] [15]

Liendo and C

P. Liendo and C. Meneghelli, JHEP01, 122 (2017), arXiv:1608.05126 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

[16] [16]

Giombi and S

S. Giombi and S. Komatsu, JHEP05, 109 (2018), [Erra- tum: JHEP 11, 123 (2018)], arXiv:1802.05201 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[17] [17]

Cachazo, M

F. Cachazo, M. R. Douglas, N. Seiberg, and E. Witten, JHEP12, 071 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0211170

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

[18] [18]

Grant, P

L. Grant, P. A. Grassi, S. Kim, and S. Minwalla, JHEP 05, 049 (2008), arXiv:0803.4183 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

[19] [19]

Chang and X

C.-M. Chang and X. Yin, Phys. Rev. D88, 106005 (2013), arXiv:1305.6314 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

[20] [20]

Green, Z

D. Green, Z. Komargodski, N. Seiberg, Y. Tachikawa, and B. Wecht, JHEP06, 106 (2010), arXiv:1005.3546 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

[21] [21]

Komargodski and D

Z. Komargodski and D. Simmons-Duffin, J. Phys. A50, 154001 (2017), arXiv:1603.04444 [hep-th]

arXiv 2017

[22] [22]

Behan, L

C. Behan, L. Rastelli, S. Rychkov, and B. Zan, J. Phys. A50, 354002 (2017), arXiv:1703.05325 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

[23] [23]

Behan, JHEP03, 127 (2018), arXiv:1709.03967 [hep- th]

C. Behan, JHEP03, 127 (2018), arXiv:1709.03967 [hep- th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[24] [25]

Notice that (C 2 B1[2,0])(ij)kℓ = 2(C 2 B1[2,0]+)ijkℓ where A(ij) =A ij +A ji

[25] [26]

Gabai, A

B. Gabai, A. Sever, and D.-l. Zhong, Phys. Rev. D112, 065004 (2025), arXiv:2501.06900 [hep-th]

arXiv 2025

[26] [27]

Girault, M

B. Girault, M. F. Paulos, and P. van Vliet, (2025), arXiv:2509.26561 [hep-th]

arXiv 2025

[27] [28]

Drukker, Z

N. Drukker, Z. Kong, and P. Kravchuk, (2025), arXiv:2512.15913 [hep-th]

arXiv 2025

[28] [29]

Belton and Z

J. Belton and Z. Kong, JHEP05, 103 (2026), arXiv:2510.08519 [hep-th]

arXiv 2026

[29] [30]

Equivalently this can be rewritten asC 0iO +C i0O = 0∀ Oof typeB 1[2,0]

[30] [31]

This can be done sinceβ (0,I) = 0 and∂ ζ(0,J) β(i,I) = 0

[31] [32]

The additional symme- tryT ijkℓ =T ikjℓ amounts to a crossing-type relation for these OPE coefficients

The tensorT=C 2 B1[2,0]+, satisfiesT ijkℓ =T jikℓ =T kℓij as is manifest from its definition (13) and the parity-even nature of the exchanged operators. The additional symme- tryT ijkℓ =T ikjℓ amounts to a crossing-type relation for these OPE coefficients. While a general proof is not yet available, we have checked this identity at leading order in pertur...

[32] [33]

Ferrero and C

P. Ferrero and C. Meneghelli, Phys. Rev. D104, L081703 (2021), arXiv:2103.10440 [hep-th]

arXiv 2021

[33] [34]

Artico, J

D. Artico, J. Barrat, and G. Peveri, JHEP02, 190 (2025), arXiv:2410.08271 [hep-th]

arXiv 2025

[34] [35]

This implies that the integration produces boundary terms that we can evaluate in terms of OPE coefficients; a similar mechanism takes place in [49]

[35] [36]

This is- sue is resolved by considering a perturbative mixing be- tween ΦI and Φ6

Some care is needed as the limitg 2 Y M →0 does not com- mute with removing the short-distance regulator because of terms of the formϵ ∆(g2 Y M )−1 with ∆(0) = 1. This is- sue is resolved by considering a perturbative mixing be- tween ΦI and Φ6. This mechanism is essentially discussed in [25, 50]

[36] [37]

Artico, C

D. Artico, C. Meneghelli, M. Savi, and R. Treilis, to appear

[37] [38]

A similar multitude of operators with the same quan- tum numbers as the displacement supermultiplets exists for half-BPS defects in the 6d, (2,0) theory, see [51]

[38] [39]

Polchinski and J

J. Polchinski and J. Sully, JHEP10, 059 (2011), arXiv:1104.5077 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

[39] [40]

Beccaria, S

M. Beccaria, S. Giombi, and A. A. Tseytlin, J. Phys. A 55, 255401 (2022), arXiv:2202.00028 [hep-th]

arXiv 2022

[40] [41]

Castiglioni, S

L. Castiglioni, S. Penati, M. Tenser, and D. Trancanelli, JHEP08, 106 (2023), arXiv:2211.16501 [hep-th]

arXiv 2023

[41] [42]

Aharony, G

O. Aharony, G. Cuomo, Z. Komargodski, M. Mezei, and A. Raviv-Moshe, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 151601 (2023), arXiv:2211.11775 [hep-th]

arXiv 2023

[42] [43]

Chang and Y.-H

C.-M. Chang and Y.-H. Lin, (2024), arXiv:2402.10129 [hep-th]

arXiv 2024

[43] [44]

Bonetti and C

F. Bonetti and C. Meneghelli, (2025), arXiv:2506.15678 [hep-th]

arXiv 2025

[44] [45]

For a recent study of the relation between continuous deformations and conformal manifolds see [52]

[45] [46]

Gomis and F

J. Gomis and F. Passerini, JHEP08, 074 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0604007

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

[46] [47]

Homrich, J

A. Homrich, J. Penedones, J. Toledo, B. C. van Rees, and P. Vieira, JHEP11, 076 (2019), arXiv:1905.06905 [hep- th]

arXiv 2019

[47] [48]

Qiao and S

J. Qiao and S. Rychkov, JHEP12, 119 (2017), arXiv:1709.00008 [hep-th]. 6

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

[48] [50]

Y. Chen, S. Colin-Ellerin, O. Mamroud, and K. Pa- padodimas, (2026), arXiv:2604.23287 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

[49] [51]

Cavagli` a, N

A. Cavagli` a, N. Gromov, J. Julius, and M. Preti, JHEP 05, 164 (2022), arXiv:2203.09556 [hep-th]

arXiv 2022

[50] [52]

Meneghelli and M

C. Meneghelli and M. Tr´ epanier, JHEP07, 165 (2023), arXiv:2212.05020 [hep-th]

arXiv 2023

[51] [53]

Komatsu, Y

S. Komatsu, Y. Kusuki, M. Meineri, and H. Ooguri, (2025), arXiv:2512.11045 [hep-th]. Appendix A: Hilbert series The Hilbert seriesH R(x) =P k≥0 dim(Mk)xk counts the number of weight-khalf-BPS operators. The coefficients dim(Mk) are integers, which are also equal to the number of times the trivial representation1appears in the tensor productR⊗ ¯R⊗Sym k(Adj...

arXiv 2025

[52] [54]

Here, we will determine♯by comparison with the known result for the fundamental Wilson line forsu(N)

can be fixed by looking at the standard SUSY transformations preserved by the line, see for example the conventions in [14]. Here, we will determine♯by comparison with the known result for the fundamental Wilson line forsu(N). Now we are ready to compute the relevant two point functions. For the primaries one finds ⟨O(i) 1 (Φ6(t1))O(j) 1 (Φ6(t2))⟩(0) = g2...

[53] [55]

Okubo and H

S. Okubo and H. Myung, Hadronic J.4, 199 (1981)

1981

[54] [56]

A. M. Perelomov and V. S. Popov, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat.32, 1368 (1968)

1968

[55] [57]

Yangians and classical lie algebras,

A. Molev, M. Nazarov, and G. Olshanskii, “Yangians and classical lie algebras,” (1994), arXiv:hep-th/9409025 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

[56] [58]

Beisert, C

N. Beisert, C. Kristjansen, J. Plefka, G. W. Semenoff, and M. Staudacher, Nucl. Phys. B650, 125 (2003), arXiv:hep- th/0208178

arXiv 2003

[57] [59]

Drukker and J

N. Drukker and J. Plefka, JHEP04, 001 (2009), arXiv:0812.3341 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

[58] [60]

N. I. Usyukina and A. I. Davydychev, Phys. Lett. B332, 159 (1994), arXiv:hep-ph/9402223

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

[59] [61]

N. I. Usyukina and A. I. Davydychev, Phys. Lett. B348, 503 (1995), arXiv:hep-ph/9412356

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

[60] [62]

Liendo, C

P. Liendo, C. Meneghelli, and V. Mitev, JHEP10, 077 (2018), arXiv:1806.01862 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[61] [63]

Anselmi, Nucl

D. Anselmi, Nucl. Phys. B541, 369 (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9809192

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

[62] [64]

A. V. Belitsky, J. Henn, C. Jarczak, D. Mueller, and E. Sokatchev, Phys. Rev. D77, 045029 (2008), arXiv:0707.2936 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

[63] [65]

Rychkov and Z

S. Rychkov and Z. M. Tan, J. Phys. A48, 29FT01 (2015), arXiv:1505.00963 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

[64] [66]

L. F. Alday and J. Maldacena, JHEP11, 068 (2007), arXiv:0710.1060 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

[65] [67]

Ferrero and C

P. Ferrero and C. Meneghelli, JHEP05, 090 (2024), arXiv:2312.12550 [hep-th]

arXiv 2024

[66] [68]

Cooke, A

M. Cooke, A. Dekel, and N. Drukker, J. Phys. A50, 335401 (2017), arXiv:1703.03812 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017