pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.08619 · v1 · pith:2NHFGPPPnew · submitted 2026-06-07 · ⚛️ physics.chem-ph · physics.comp-ph

On the Covalent Fields of Molecule-Surface Interactions

Edvin Fako , Philippe Schwaller This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 17:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.chem-ph physics.comp-ph
keywords covalent fieldactive sitesBrønsted-Evans-Polanyi relationslinear scaling relationssurface chemistrycatalysishigh-entropy alloysmolecule-surface interactions
0
0 comments X

The pith

Representing chemical affinity as a continuous covalent field resolves active site ambiguity and scaling relation issues.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper claims that three problems in molecule-surface interactions arise from viewing chemical affinity as a property of discrete geometric sites. These are the unclear definition of active sites, the merely empirical status of Brønsted-Evans-Polanyi relations, and the sudden breakdowns of linear scaling relations. By instead modeling affinity as a continuous covalent field across the entire interface, active sites become regions exceeding a thermal threshold for bond formation. This Covalent Field Theory gives a theoretical foundation to BEP relations through field decomposition and treats scaling breakdowns as topological bifurcations. The approach is shown to work on complex systems like high-entropy alloy nanoparticles and partially reduced oxides.

Core claim

All three symptoms—the ambiguity of the active site, the empirical status of Brønsted-Evans-Polanyi relations, and the unpredictability of linear scaling relation breakdown—are resolved when chemical affinity is represented as a continuous property of the interface: the covalent field. Active sites emerge as regions where the field sustains a bias toward bond formation beyond the thermal threshold, removing the need for geometric classification. Linear scaling relations are correlation structure in the field across probe families; their breakdown is a topological bifurcation with a precise geometric signature. Brønsted-Evans-Polanyi correlations arise from the covalent field decomposition, p

What carries the argument

The covalent field, a continuous property of the molecule-surface interface that indicates regions sustaining a bias toward bond formation.

If this is right

  • Active sites can be identified without prior geometric classification of the surface.
  • Brønsted-Evans-Polanyi relations gain a theoretical basis from the decomposition of the covalent field.
  • Breakdowns in linear scaling relations correspond to topological bifurcations with identifiable geometric signatures.
  • The framework applies directly to surfaces of arbitrary compositional and structural complexity such as high-entropy alloys and oxides.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Catalyst design could move from selecting discrete site geometries to engineering overall field distributions across interfaces.
  • The same continuous-field description might allow consistent treatment of reactivity on both crystalline and amorphous or disordered surfaces.

Load-bearing premise

A well-defined covalent field exists as a continuous property of the interface that can be computed or extracted independently, with active sites emerging precisely where this field exceeds a thermal threshold without requiring prior geometric classification.

What would settle it

A computation of the covalent field on a known catalyst surface that fails to match experimentally observed active site locations, or a set of pathways where Brønsted-Evans-Polanyi slopes deviate from those predicted by the field's decomposition.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.08619 by Edvin Fako, Philippe Schwaller.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Covalent field decomposition of an interface interaction a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Covalent field manifold. a, PtPdAuAgCu high-entropy alloy nanoparticle containing 55 atoms. b, Orientable quad mesh M fitted to the particle surface; preserved topology enables surface normal computation at each vertex. c, Covalent field of carbon Φ MNP ∗C mapped onto the manifold as a function of the two-dimensional surface coordinates, and its gradient map (d); each vertex corresponds to the interaction … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Linear scaling relations across the manifold. a–c [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Covalent field decomposition of the ∗C+∗O → ∗CO reaction pathway. a, Minimum-energy pathway computed by the nudged elastic band method; images are colored by total energy relative to the initial state. b, Pairwise decomposition of the total energy into individual probe-field contributions: Φ PNP ∗C (gray), Φ PNP ∗O (red), and the C–O pair interaction EC-O (white). Both atoms are displaced from their equili… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Brønsted–Evans–Polanyi correlations as a consequence of covalent field decomposition. a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Computational tractability. a, Five ionic relaxations (156 calls) versus sparse manifold grid. b, Three NEB calculations (∼7000 calls) versus dense manifold grid. Manifold evaluation distributes effort uniformly across the surface. calls and yield five data points, whereas a sparse manifold grid (218 vertices) maps the entire surface at similar cost (Figure 6a). Likewise, three NEB calculations consume ∼70… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Manifold construction and surrogate-SMILES probe specification. a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The ambiguity of the active site, the empirical status of Br{\o}nsted-Evans-Polanyi relations, and the unpredictability of linear scaling relation breakdown are three symptoms of a single representational choice: treating chemical affinity as an attribute of discrete geometric sites. Here we show that all three are resolved when chemical affinity is represented as a continuous property of the interface: the covalent field. We present a framework, Covalent Field Theory (CFT), in which active sites emerge as regions where the field sustains a bias toward bond formation beyond the thermal threshold, removing the need for geometric classification. Linear scaling relations are correlation structure in the field across probe families; their breakdown is a topological bifurcation with a precise geometric signature. Br{\o}nsted-Evans-Polanyi correlations arise from the covalent field decomposition, providing a theoretical basis for what has previously been treated as an empirical regularity, demonstrated across ~120,000 candidate pathways. Applied to a high-entropy alloy nanoparticle and a partially reduced high-entropy oxide, CFT maps these properties onto surfaces of arbitrary compositional and structural complexity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents Covalent Field Theory (CFT), which represents chemical affinity as a continuous covalent field at the molecule-surface interface rather than as attributes of discrete geometric sites. This is claimed to resolve three issues: the ambiguity of active sites (emerging as regions where the field exceeds a thermal threshold), the empirical nature of Brønsted-Evans-Polanyi relations (arising from field decomposition), and the unpredictability of linear scaling relation breakdowns (as topological bifurcations). The approach is demonstrated across approximately 120,000 pathways and applied to high-entropy alloy nanoparticles and partially reduced high-entropy oxides.

Significance. If the covalent field can be rigorously defined and computed independently of geometric classifications, this framework could significantly advance the understanding of surface chemistry by providing a continuous, emergent description of reactivity. The large-scale demonstration and application to complex, compositionally disordered materials highlight its potential utility in catalysis research. However, the significance hinges on addressing the independence of the field definition from geometric priors.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that the covalent field is a continuous property computable independently of geometric site classification is not supported by details in the abstract. The framework is introduced specifically to resolve the three symptoms, raising the risk of circularity where the field is defined in terms of the phenomena it explains rather than an external, independent criterion.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: No equations, definitions of the covalent field, or specific validation details are provided, despite claims of resolving issues across 120,000 pathways. This makes it difficult to assess whether the field extraction procedure is free from implicit geometric inputs, which is load-bearing for the resolution of active-site ambiguity.
minor comments (2)
  1. Ensure consistent rendering of special characters such as ø in Brønsted throughout the manuscript.
  2. [Abstract] The approximate value '~120,000' should be written in words or as 'approximately 120,000' in formal prose.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on the abstract's clarity. The comments correctly identify that the abstract, as a high-level summary, does not fully detail the field's independent definition or validation procedure. We agree this warrants revision and will update the abstract to better support the central claims while preserving its conciseness. We respond to each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that the covalent field is a continuous property computable independently of geometric site classification is not supported by details in the abstract. The framework is introduced specifically to resolve the three symptoms, raising the risk of circularity where the field is defined in terms of the phenomena it explains rather than an external, independent criterion.

    Authors: The abstract motivates the framework by its ability to resolve the three symptoms but does not include the computational definition. In the manuscript, the covalent field is defined as a primary, continuous quantity derived from first-principles electronic structure (spatial distribution of covalent bond order computed via orbital overlap or projected density of states at the interface), with no geometric site classification used as input. Active sites, scaling relations, and BEP correlations then emerge as derived properties. This structure avoids circularity. We will revise the abstract to include a brief statement of this independent computational basis. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: No equations, definitions of the covalent field, or specific validation details are provided, despite claims of resolving issues across 120,000 pathways. This makes it difficult to assess whether the field extraction procedure is free from implicit geometric inputs, which is load-bearing for the resolution of active-site ambiguity.

    Authors: We agree the abstract omits these elements due to length constraints. The full manuscript contains the explicit equations for the covalent field, its extraction procedure (independent of geometric priors), and the validation across ~120,000 pathways in the Methods and Results sections. To address the concern directly at the abstract level, we will add a concise clause noting the field's first-principles origin and independence from geometric classification. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; claims rest on independent framework application

full rationale

The provided abstract introduces the covalent field as an alternative continuous representation of chemical affinity and states that active sites, BEP relations, and LSR breakdown follow from it, with explicit demonstration across ~120,000 pathways on complex surfaces. No equations, self-citations, or definitional reductions are present that would make the field equivalent to the phenomena by construction. The derivation is therefore self-contained against the stated empirical benchmarks rather than reducing to fitted inputs or prior author results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the existence and computability of the covalent field as a new continuous descriptor; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or external evidence for the field are stated in the abstract.

invented entities (1)
  • covalent field no independent evidence
    purpose: continuous representation of chemical affinity at the interface
    Introduced as the core entity that resolves the three symptoms; no independent evidence or falsifiable prediction outside the framework is provided in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5715 in / 1198 out tokens · 16755 ms · 2026-06-27T17:54:42.260127+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Hydrog ´enations et d´eshydrog´enations par catalyse.Berichte der deutschen chemischen Gesellschaft, 44(3):1984–2001, July 1911

    Paul Sabatier. Hydrog ´enations et d´eshydrog´enations par catalyse.Berichte der deutschen chemischen Gesellschaft, 44(3):1984–2001, July 1911

    1984

  2. [2]

    A theory of the catalytic surface.Proc

    H S Taylor. A theory of the catalytic surface.Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Sci., 108(745):105–111, May 1925

    1925

  3. [3]

    heterogeneous reactions

    Irving Langmuir. Part ii.—“heterogeneous reactions”. chemical reactions on surfaces. Trans. Faraday Soc., 17(0):607–620, 1922

    1922

  4. [4]

    Sur la m ´ecanique des ph ´enom`enes irr ´eversibles.Journal de Chimie Physique et de Physico-Chimie Biologique, 10:139–212, 1913

    Ren ´e Marcelin. Sur la m ´ecanique des ph ´enom`enes irr ´eversibles.Journal de Chimie Physique et de Physico-Chimie Biologique, 10:139–212, 1913. First introduction of the concept of potential energy surfaces

    1913

  5. [5]

    Web of science [database], 2025

    Clarivate Analytics. Web of science [database], 2025. Accessed on September 10, 2025

    2025

  6. [6]

    Weckhuysen

    Charlotte V ogt and Bert M. Weckhuysen. The concept of active site in heterogeneous catalysis.Nature Reviews Chemistry, 6(2):89–111, January 2022

    2022

  7. [7]

    Hohenberg and W

    P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn. Inhomogeneous electron gas.Physical Review, 136(3B):B864–B871, November 1964

    1964

  8. [8]

    Kohn and L

    W. Kohn and L. J. Sham. Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects.Physical Review, 140(4A):A1133–A1138, November 1965

    1965

  9. [9]

    M. C. Payne, M. P. Teter, D. C. Allan, T. A. Arias, and J. D. Joannopoulos. Iterative minimization techniques for ab-initio total-energy calculations: molecular dynamics and conjugate gradients.Reviews of Modern Physics, 64(4):1045–1097, October 1992

    1992

  10. [10]

    Abild-Pedersen, J

    F. Abild-Pedersen, J. Greeley, F. Studt, J. Rossmeisl, T. R. Munter, P. G. Moses, E. Sk ´ulason, T. Bligaard, and J. K. Nørskov. Scaling properties of adsorption energies for hydrogen-containing molecules on transition-metal surfaces.Physical Review Letters, 99(1), July 2007

    2007

  11. [11]

    Wodrich, and Cl ´emence Corminboeuf

    Michael Busch, Matthew D. Wodrich, and Cl ´emence Corminboeuf. Linear scaling re- lationships and volcano plots in homogeneous catalysis – revisiting the suzuki reaction. Chemical Science, 6(12):6754–6761, 2015. 25

    2015

  12. [12]

    Bligaard, J.K

    T. Bligaard, J.K. Nørskov, S. Dahl, J. Matthiesen, C.H. Christensen, and J. Sehested. The brønsted–evans–polanyi relation and the volcano curve in heterogeneous catalysis. Journal of Catalysis, 224(1):206–217, May 2004

    2004

  13. [13]

    Theoretical surface science and catalysis—calculations and concepts

    B Hammer and J K Nørskov. Theoretical surface science and catalysis—calculations and concepts. InAdvances in Catalysis, Advances in catalysis, pages 71–129. Elsevier, 2000

    2000

  14. [14]

    From the sabatier principle to a predictive theory of transition-metal heterogeneous catal- ysis.J

    Andrew J Medford, Aleksandra V ojvodic, Jens S Hummelshøj, Johannes V oss, Frank Abild-Pedersen, Felix Studt, Thomas Bligaard, Anders Nilsson, and Jens K Nørskov. From the sabatier principle to a predictive theory of transition-metal heterogeneous catal- ysis.J. Catal., 328:36–42, August 2015

    2015

  15. [15]

    Statistical learning goes beyond the d-band model providing the thermochemistry of adsorbates on transition metals.Nature Commu- nications, 10(1), October 2019

    Rodrigo Garc ´ıa-Muelas and N´uria L ´opez. Statistical learning goes beyond the d-band model providing the thermochemistry of adsorbates on transition metals.Nature Commu- nications, 10(1), October 2019

    2019

  16. [16]

    Untersuchung von oberfl ¨achenreaktionen mittels beugung langsamer elektronen (LEED).Surf

    G Ertl. Untersuchung von oberfl ¨achenreaktionen mittels beugung langsamer elektronen (LEED).Surf. Sci., 6(2):208–232, February 1967

    1967

  17. [17]

    Adsorbate-induced restructuring of surfaces.Prog

    G A Somorjai and M A Van Hove. Adsorbate-induced restructuring of surfaces.Prog. Surf. Sci., 30(3-4):201–231, January 1989

    1989

  18. [18]

    Surface restructuring as a mechanism for bond break- ing and catalytic reactions at metal surfaces.Catal

    G A Somorjai and M A Van Hove. Surface restructuring as a mechanism for bond break- ing and catalytic reactions at metal surfaces.Catal. Letters, 1(12):433–437, December 1988

    1988

  19. [19]

    Truhlar, Bruce C

    Donald G. Truhlar, Bruce C. Garrett, and Stephen J. Klippenstein. Current status of transition-state theory.The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 100(31):12771–12800, Jan- uary 1996

    1996

  20. [20]

    Bart ´ok, James Kermode, Noam Bernstein, and G´abor Cs´anyi

    Albert P. Bart ´ok, James Kermode, Noam Bernstein, and G´abor Cs´anyi. Machine learning a general-purpose interatomic potential for silicon.Physical Review X, 8(4), December 2018

    2018

  21. [21]

    Ilyes Batatia, D ´avid P ´eter Kov ´acs, Gregor N. C. Simm, Christoph Ortner, and G ´abor Cs´anyi. Mace: Higher order equivariant message passing neural networks for fast and accurate force fields, 2022. 26

    2022

  22. [22]

    Lawrence Zit- nick, and Zachary Ulissi

    Lowik Chanussot, Abhishek Das, Siddharth Goyal, Thibaut Lavril, Muhammed Shuaibi, Morgane Riviere, Kevin Tran, Javier Heras-Domingo, Caleb Ho, Weihua Hu, Aini Pal- izhati, Anuroop Sriram, Brandon Wood, Junwoong Yoon, Devi Parikh, C. Lawrence Zit- nick, and Zachary Ulissi. Open catalyst 2020 (oc20) dataset and community challenges. ACS Catalysis, 11(10):60...

    2020

  23. [23]

    Wood, Siddharth Goyal, Abhishek Das, Javier Heras-Domingo, Adeesh Kolluru, Ammar Rizvi, Nima Shoghi, Anuroop Sriram, F ´elix Therrien, Jehad Abed, Oleksandr V oznyy, Edward H

    Richard Tran, Janice Lan, Muhammed Shuaibi, Brandon M. Wood, Siddharth Goyal, Abhishek Das, Javier Heras-Domingo, Adeesh Kolluru, Ammar Rizvi, Nima Shoghi, Anuroop Sriram, F ´elix Therrien, Jehad Abed, Oleksandr V oznyy, Edward H. Sargent, Zachary Ulissi, and C. Lawrence Zitnick. The open catalyst 2022 (oc22) dataset and challenges for oxide electrocataly...

    2022

  24. [24]

    Brabson, Abhishek Das, Zachary Ulissi, Matt Uyttendaele, Andrew J

    Anuroop Sriram, Sihoon Choi, Xiaohan Yu, Logan M. Brabson, Abhishek Das, Zachary Ulissi, Matt Uyttendaele, Andrew J. Medford, and David S. Sholl. The open dac 2023 dataset and challenges for sorbent discovery in direct air capture.ACS Central Science, 10(5):923–941, May 2024

    2023

  25. [25]

    Developing machine learning for heterogeneous catalysis with ex- perimental and computational data.Nat

    Carlota Bozal-Ginesta, Sergio Pablo-Garc ´ıa, Changhyeok Choi, Albert Taranc ´on, and Al´an Aspuru-Guzik. Developing machine learning for heterogeneous catalysis with ex- perimental and computational data.Nat. Rev. Chem., 9(9):601–616, September 2025

    2025

  26. [26]

    Kitchin, N ´uria L ´opez, Neil M

    Hongliang Xin, John R. Kitchin, N ´uria L ´opez, Neil M. Schweitzer, Nongnuch Artrith, Fanglin Che, Lars C. Grabow, G. T. Kasun Kalhara Gunasooriya, Heather J. Kulik, Teodoro Laino, Hao Li, Suljo Linic, Andrew J. Medford, Randall J. Meyer, Jiayu Peng, Cory Phillips, Jin Qian, Long Qi, Wendy J. Shaw, Zachary W. Ulissi, Siwen Wang, and Xiaonan Wang. Roadmap...

    2026

  27. [27]

    A universal graph deep learning interatomic potential for the periodic table.Nature Computational Science, 2(11):718–728, November 2022

    Chi Chen and Shyue Ping Ong. A universal graph deep learning interatomic potential for the periodic table.Nature Computational Science, 2(11):718–728, November 2022

    2022

  28. [28]

    Nikolas Lausch, and J ¨org Behler

    Amir Omranpour, Jan Elsner, K. Nikolas Lausch, and J ¨org Behler. Machine learning potentials for heterogeneous catalysis.ACS Catalysis, 15(3):1616–1634, January 2025

    2025

  29. [29]

    Machine learning-accelerated evolutionary monte carlo for rapid phase exploration of compositionally complex materials in reactive environments, September 2025

    Shuang Han and Sandip De. Machine learning-accelerated evolutionary monte carlo for rapid phase exploration of compositionally complex materials in reactive environments, September 2025. 27

    2025

  30. [30]

    Rapid mapping of alloy surface phase diagrams via bayesian evolutionary multitasking.Npj Comput

    Shuang Han, Steen Lysgaard, Tejs Vegge, and Heine Anton Hansen. Rapid mapping of alloy surface phase diagrams via bayesian evolutionary multitasking.Npj Comput. Mater., 9(1), August 2023

    2023

  31. [31]

    Introduc- ing structural sensitivity into adsorption-energy scaling relations by means of coordination numbers.Nat

    Federico Calle-Vallejo, David Loffreda, Marc T M Koper, and Philippe Sautet. Introduc- ing structural sensitivity into adsorption-energy scaling relations by means of coordination numbers.Nat. Chem., 7(5):403–410, May 2015

    2015

  32. [32]

    Hammer and J.K

    B. Hammer and J.K. Nørskov. Electronic factors determining the reactivity of metal surfaces.Surface Science, 343(3):211–220, December 1995

    1995

  33. [33]

    J. K. Nørskov and N. D. Lang. Effective-medium theory of chemical binding: Application to chemisorption.Physical Review B, 21(6):2131–2136, March 1980

    1980

  34. [34]

    http://www.w3.org/1998/math/mathml

    J. K. Nørskov. Covalent effects in the effective-medium the- ory of chemical binding: Hydrogen heats of solution in the¡mml:math xmlns:mml=“http://www.w3.org/1998/math/mathml” dis- play=“inline”¿¡mml:mn¿3¡/mml:mn¿¡mml:mi¿d¡/mml:mi¿¡/mml:math¿metals.Physical Review B, 26(6):2875–2885, September 1982

    1998

  35. [35]

    Margraf, Hyunwook Jung, Christoph Scheurer, and Karsten Reuter

    Johannes T. Margraf, Hyunwook Jung, Christoph Scheurer, and Karsten Reuter. Explor- ing catalytic reaction networks with machine learning.Nature Catalysis, 6(2):112–121, January 2023

    2023

  36. [36]

    Simple heuristics for advanced sampling of reactive species on surfaces.ACS Catalysis, 16(4):3149–3158, February 2026

    Edvin Fako and Sandip De. Simple heuristics for advanced sampling of reactive species on surfaces.ACS Catalysis, 16(4):3149–3158, February 2026

    2026

  37. [37]

    Ligand-modulated release of copper active sites ex- tends ethylene production in co 2 electroreduction.Journal of the American Chemical Society, March 2026

    Jari Leemans, Edvin Fako, Ludovic Zaza, Moritz Tritschler, Junwu Chen, Philippe Schwaller, and Raffaella Buonsanti. Ligand-modulated release of copper active sites ex- tends ethylene production in co 2 electroreduction.Journal of the American Chemical Society, March 2026

    2026

  38. [38]

    Springer Nether- lands, 2003

    Lorenzo Fatibene and Mauro Francaviglia.Fiber Bundles, page 9–51. Springer Nether- lands, 2003

    2003

  39. [39]

    Elena, D ´avid P

    Ilyes Batatia, Philipp Benner, Yuan Chiang, Alin M. Elena, D ´avid P. Kov ´acs, Janosh Riebesell, Xavier R. Advincula, Mark Asta, Matthew Avaylon, William J. Baldwin, 28 Fabian Berger, Noam Bernstein, Arghya Bhowmik, Filippo Bigi, Samuel M. Blau, Vlad C˘arare, Michele Ceriotti, Sanggyu Chong, James P. Darby, Sandip De, Flaviano Della Pia, V olker L. Derin...

    2025

  40. [40]

    A user’s guide to discrete morse theory.S ´eminaire Lotharingien de Combinatoire [electronic only], 48:B48c, 35 p., electronic only–B48c, 35 p., electronic only, 2002

    Robin Forman. A user’s guide to discrete morse theory.S ´eminaire Lotharingien de Combinatoire [electronic only], 48:B48c, 35 p., electronic only–B48c, 35 p., electronic only, 2002

    2002

  41. [41]

    Electro- chemical co2 reduction: A classification problem.ChemPhysChem, 18(22):3266–3273, October 2017

    Alexander Bagger, Wen Ju, Ana Sofia Varela, Peter Strasser, and Jan Rossmeisl. Electro- chemical co2 reduction: A classification problem.ChemPhysChem, 18(22):3266–3273, October 2017

    2017

  42. [42]

    Unfolding the structural stability of nanoalloys via symmetry- constrained genetic algorithm and neural network potential.Npj Comput

    Shuang Han, Giovanni Barcaro, Alessandro Fortunelli, Steen Lysgaard, Tejs Vegge, and Heine Anton Hansen. Unfolding the structural stability of nanoalloys via symmetry- constrained genetic algorithm and neural network potential.Npj Comput. Mater., 8(1), June 2022

    2022

  43. [43]

    Juan Manuel Arce-Ramos, Quang Thang Trinh, Zicong Marvin Wong, Ben Wang, Ben- jamin W. J. Chen, Jia Zhang, and Teck Leong Tan. Breaking scaling relations in agau- 29 cupdpt high-entropy alloy nanoparticles for co2 electroreduction via machine learning. Materials Horizons, 2025

    2025

  44. [44]

    The atomic simulation environment—a python library for working with atoms.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 29(27):273002, June 2017

    Ask Hjorth Larsen, Jens Jørgen Mortensen, Jakob Blomqvist, Ivano E Castelli, Rune Christensen, Marcin Dułak, Jesper Friis, Michael N Groves, Bjørk Hammer, Cory Har- gus, Eric D Hermes, Paul C Jennings, Peter Bjerre Jensen, James Kermode, John R Kitchin, Esben Leonhard Kolsbjerg, Joseph Kubal, Kristen Kaasbjerg, Steen Lysgaard, J´on Bergmann Maronsson, Tri...

    2017

  45. [45]

    Improved tangent estimate in the nudged elas- tic band method for finding minimum energy paths and saddle points.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 113(22):9978–9985, December 2000

    Graeme Henkelman and Hannes J ´onsson. Improved tangent estimate in the nudged elas- tic band method for finding minimum energy paths and saddle points.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 113(22):9978–9985, December 2000

    2000

  46. [46]

    On the covalent fields of molecule–surface interac- tions, 2026

    Edvin Fako and Philippe Schwaller. On the covalent fields of molecule–surface interac- tions, 2026. 30 Supporting Information: On the Covalent Fields of Molecule–Surface Interactions Edvin Fako1,2,∗, Philippe Schwaller1,2,∗ Corresponding authors: edvinfako@gmail.com (E. Fako), philippe.schwaller@epfl.ch (P. Schwaller) 1 Laboratory of Artificial Chemical I...

    2026