pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.09975 · v1 · pith:UGDBUQXHnew · submitted 2026-06-08 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Discovery and Spectroscopic Characterization of a Distant, Compact Milky Way Satellite in Gemini

K. Overdeck , W. Cerny , C. Y. Tan , C. E. Mart\'inez-V\'azquez , A. B. Pace , J. A. Sharp , A. Drlica-Wagner , M. Geha
show 22 more authors
D. J. Sand J. A. Carballo-Bello Y. Choi D. Crnojev\'ic P. S. Ferguson M. Hirschauer D. J. James N. Kallivayalil G. Limberg P. Massana S. Mau G. E. Medina B. Mutlu-Pakdil M. Navabi D. L. Nidever N. E. D. No\"el A. Pai A. H. Riley J. D. Sakowska L. Santana-Silva G. S. Stringfellow A. K. Vivas
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 16:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords Milky Way satellitesultra-faint systemsstar clustersdwarf galaxieshalo objectsspectroscopic confirmation
0
0 comments X

The pith

A compact ultra-faint system in Gemini is confirmed as a bound Milky Way satellite at 120 kpc with four member stars.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports the discovery of a compact ultra-faint satellite of the Milky Way. The object was identified by cross-matching independent search algorithms on wide-field imaging data and then verified with deeper imaging. Spectroscopic data securely identify four member stars, including two blue horizontal branch stars, that establish the system as gravitationally bound at a heliocentric distance of 120 kpc with a mean radial velocity of -82.7 km/s. The measured luminosity and size place the system in an ambiguous regime where morphology alone cannot distinguish between a star cluster and a dwarf galaxy, while the metallicity upper limit of less than -2.5 supports an ancient stellar population. The work notes that similar faint distant systems are expected to appear more often in future surveys.

Core claim

The system is an ultra-faint (M_V = -2.1) compact (r_1/2 = 8.6 pc) Milky Way satellite at a heliocentric distance of 120 kpc. Medium-resolution spectroscopy identifies four members with mean radial velocity v_hel = -82.7 km/s, confirming the system as bound, and places an upper limit [Fe/H] ≲ -2.5 on the metallicity of its brightest star, supporting classification as either an ancient star cluster or ultra-faint dwarf galaxy.

What carries the argument

Photometric detection via cross-matched search algorithms on wide-field imaging data combined with spectroscopic identification of member stars to establish binding and metallicity.

If this is right

  • The physical properties place the system in the regime of ambiguous ultra-faint compact halo satellites that cannot be confidently classified as dwarf galaxies or star clusters from morphology alone.
  • The metallicity upper limit supports the presence of an ancient stellar population in the system.
  • The discovery of similar faint distant systems is expected to become more common with upcoming surveys.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Follow-up proper-motion measurements could further test whether the stars form a coherent kinematic group.
  • The object adds one more data point to the census of known outer-halo satellites whose nature remains ambiguous between clusters and galaxies.
  • The cross-matching approach used for initial detection may increase completeness for similar low-surface-brightness objects in existing imaging datasets.

Load-bearing premise

That four spectroscopically confirmed members are sufficient to establish the system as a gravitationally bound satellite rather than a chance alignment or foreground contamination.

What would settle it

Additional radial velocity measurements or proper motion data showing that the four stars do not share a common space motion or velocity dispersion consistent with gravitational binding.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.09975 by A. B. Pace, A. Drlica-Wagner, A. H. Riley, A. K. Vivas, A. Pai, B. Mutlu-Pakdil, C. E. Mart\'inez-V\'azquez, C. Y. Tan, D. Crnojev\'ic, D. J. James, D. J. Sand, D. L. Nidever, G. E. Medina, G. Limberg, G. S. Stringfellow, J. A. Carballo-Bello, J. A. Sharp, J. D. Sakowska, K. Overdeck, L. Santana-Silva, M. Geha, M. Hirschauer, M. Navabi, N. E. D. No\"el, N. Kallivayalil, P. Massana, P. S. Ferguson, S. Mau, W. Cerny, Y. Choi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Three initial views of DELVE 8/Gemini I at the time of its discovery. (Left) Isochrone-filtered stellar density map for a 1◦ ×1 ◦ region centered on DELVE 8/Gemini I, smoothed with a Gaussian kernel with σ = 0.5 ′ . (Center) Color–magnitude diagram (CMD) assembled from the DELVE DR3 photometry with a 13.5 Gyr, Z = 0.0001 PARSEC isochrone overplotted. Stars are colored according to their distance from the c… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Follow-up r-band Gemini/GMOS image of DELVE 8/Gemini I. Relative to the Legacy Survey image ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (Left) Spatial distribution of stars with measured velocities from Keck/DEIMOS. Likely member stars are shown as orange circles, one velocity-consistent non-member is shown as an orange square, and all other non-member stars are shown as gray circles. Contours of [2, 4, 6] × a1/2 are shown as black dotted ellipses. (Center) Color–magnitude diagram of the same targets; we use DELVE DR3 photometry here becau… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparing the properties of DELVE 8/Gemini I to the population of Milky Way globular clusters (black ×s), candidate and confirmed dwarf galaxies (unfilled and filled blue triangles, respectively) and ultra-faint compact satellites (red hexagons). (Left) In the MV –r1/2 plane, DELVE 8/Gemini I’s properties are consistent with the population of ultra-faint compact satellites (r1/2 < 15 pc; µ > 24 mag arcsec−… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present the discovery of a compact Milky Way satellite in the constellation of Gemini. This system was discovered by cross-matching detections from two independent search algorithms applied to Blanco/DECam data from the third data release of the DECam Local Volume Exploration survey (DELVE DR3), and confirmed with deeper imaging from Gemini/GMOS-N. Based on these data, we determine that the system is an ultra-faint ($M_V = -2.1^{+0.4}_{-0.6}$), compact ($r_{1/2} = 8.6^{+1.4}_{-1.2}$ pc) system located at a heliocentric distance of $120^{+7}_{-6}$ kpc. These physical properties place the system in the regime of ambiguous, ultra-faint compact Milky Way halo satellites that cannot be confidently classified as dwarf galaxies or star clusters from morphology alone; we therefore name the system DELVE 8/Gemini I. From medium-resolution Keck/DEIMOS spectroscopy, we securely identify four members including two blue horizontal branch stars, confirming the system as a bound satellite moving at a mean radial velocity of $v_{\rm hel} = -82.7^{+3.7}_{-3.9} {\rm km\,s}^{-1}$. We also use these spectra to place an upper limit of $\rm [Fe/H] \lesssim -2.5$ on the metallicity of DELVE 8/Gemini I's brightest star, supporting the classification of the system as either an ancient star cluster or ultra-faint dwarf galaxy. The discovery of faint, distant systems similar to DELVE 8/Gemini I is expected to become more common with upcoming surveys.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the discovery of DELVE 8/Gemini I, a compact ultra-faint Milky Way satellite in Gemini found via cross-matching of two independent search algorithms on DELVE DR3 Blanco/DECam photometry and confirmed with deeper Gemini/GMOS-N imaging. Photometric analysis yields M_V = -2.1^{+0.4}_{-0.6}, r_{1/2} = 8.6^{+1.4}_{-1.2} pc at a heliocentric distance of 120^{+7}_{-6} kpc. Medium-resolution Keck/DEIMOS spectroscopy identifies four members (including two blue horizontal branch stars) with mean radial velocity v_hel = -82.7^{+3.7}_{-3.9} km s^{-1} and places an upper limit [Fe/H] ≲ -2.5 on the brightest star, supporting classification as either an ancient star cluster or ultra-faint dwarf galaxy.

Significance. If the spectroscopic membership holds, the result adds a valuable data point to the census of faint, distant Milky Way halo satellites in the morphologically ambiguous regime, with implications for the satellite luminosity function and dark matter substructure. The paper's use of public survey data plus targeted follow-up imaging and spectroscopy provides a clear, reproducible methodology that will scale to future wide-field surveys.

major comments (1)
  1. [Keck/DEIMOS spectroscopy results] Keck/DEIMOS spectroscopy results (as summarized in the abstract): the claim that four spectroscopically confirmed members 'confirm the system as a bound satellite' is load-bearing for the central result but lacks a quantified false-positive rate, velocity dispersion, or Monte Carlo assessment against a Galactic halo model at 120 kpc. Individual velocities, membership probabilities, and the probability of chance alignment are not reported, leaving the binding inference dependent on an untested assumption of coherence.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the description of the two search algorithms could be expanded with one sentence on their independence to strengthen the discovery narrative.
  2. Notation: asymmetric uncertainties are presented clearly but should be accompanied by a brief methods statement on how they were derived from the photometric and spectroscopic fits.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review and for identifying the need for more rigorous quantification of the spectroscopic membership. We respond to the major comment below and will revise the manuscript to address it.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Keck/DEIMOS spectroscopy results] Keck/DEIMOS spectroscopy results (as summarized in the abstract): the claim that four spectroscopically confirmed members 'confirm the system as a bound satellite' is load-bearing for the central result but lacks a quantified false-positive rate, velocity dispersion, or Monte Carlo assessment against a Galactic halo model at 120 kpc. Individual velocities, membership probabilities, and the probability of chance alignment are not reported, leaving the binding inference dependent on an untested assumption of coherence.

    Authors: We agree that the current version of the manuscript does not include the requested quantitative assessments. In the revised manuscript we will add the individual radial velocities and photometric properties of the four members in a dedicated table. We will compute and report membership probabilities for each star using a Bayesian framework that incorporates radial velocity, on-sky position relative to the center, and color-magnitude information. We will also include a Monte Carlo assessment that draws from a Galactic halo model at 120 kpc to estimate the false-positive rate for observing four stars with the observed velocity coherence by chance, along with the probability of chance alignment. The velocity dispersion (or 95% upper limit) derived from the four members will be reported explicitly. These additions will be placed in Section 4 (Spectroscopic Results) and supported by a new appendix describing the methodology. The two blue horizontal branch stars already provide strong supporting evidence due to their rarity, and this will be folded into the membership probabilities. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: observational discovery and direct measurements

full rationale

The paper reports discovery via cross-matching in DELVE DR3 imaging, confirmation with Gemini/GMOS-N deeper imaging, and Keck/DEIMOS spectroscopy identifying four members (including two BHB stars) to establish heliocentric distance, physical size, luminosity, and mean radial velocity. These are direct observational inferences from data, with no derivations, fitted parameters presented as predictions, self-citations forming the load-bearing chain, or ansatzes smuggled in. The binding inference from N=4 members is a standard small-sample interpretation (correctness risk noted separately by skeptic), not a reduction to self-definition or fitted input. Paper is self-contained against external benchmarks with no circular steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The discovery rests on standard domain assumptions in observational astronomy for converting apparent magnitudes to physical sizes and distances, plus the interpretation of radial velocity coherence as evidence of binding; no new entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • heliocentric distance
    Derived from photometric data and assumed stellar populations; reported as 120 kpc with uncertainties.
  • half-light radius
    Fitted structural parameter from imaging; reported as 8.6 pc.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard stellar isochrones and population models accurately convert observed photometry to physical parameters such as distance and metallicity.
    Invoked to derive M_V, r_1/2, distance, and [Fe/H] upper limit from the imaging and spectra.
  • domain assumption Coherent radial velocities of a small number of stars indicate gravitational binding rather than projection effects.
    Used to confirm the system as a bound satellite from the four Keck members.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 6030 in / 1564 out tokens · 26125 ms · 2026-06-27T16:05:18.270169+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 81 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Abbott, T. M. C., Adam´ ow, M., Aguena, M., et al. 2021, ApJS, 255, 20, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac00b3

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac00b3 2021

  2. [2]

    V., et al

    Ahvazi, N., Benson, A., Sales, L. V., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 529, 3387, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae761

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae761 2024

  3. [3]

    B., Garling, C

    Ahvazi, N., Pace, A. B., Garling, C. T., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.15808, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.15808

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.15808 2025

  4. [4]

    2018, PASJ, 70, S4, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psx066

    Aihara, H., Arimoto, N., Armstrong, R., et al. 2018, PASJ, 70, S4, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psx066

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1093/pasj/psx066 2018

  5. [5]

    2016, kbarbary/sep: v1.0.0, v1.0.0 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.159035

    Barbary, K., Boone, K., McCully, C., et al. 2016, kbarbary/sep: v1.0.0, v1.0.0 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.159035

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.159035 2016

  6. [6]

    2015, ApJ, 807, 50, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/807/1/50

    Bechtol, K., Drlica-Wagner, A., Balbinot, E., et al. 2015, ApJ, 807, 50, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/807/1/50

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/807/1/50 2015

  7. [7]

    B., Evans, N

    Belokurov, V., Zucker, D. B., Evans, N. W., et al. 2006, ApJL, 647, L111, doi: 10.1086/507324

    work page doi:10.1086/507324 2006

  8. [8]

    Frenk, C. S. 2002, MNRAS, 333, 156, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05387.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05387.x 2002

  9. [9]

    , keywords =

    Bressan, A., Marigo, P., Girardi, L., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 127, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21948.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21948.x 2012

  10. [10]

    S., & Boylan-Kolchin, M

    Bullock, J. S., & Boylan-Kolchin, M. 2017, ARA&A, 55, 343, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055313

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055313 2017

  11. [11]

    S., Kravtsov, A

    Bullock, J. S., Kravtsov, A. V., & Weinberg, D. H. 2000, ApJ, 539, 517, doi: 10.1086/309279

    work page doi:10.1086/309279 2000

  12. [12]

    A., Pace, A

    Cantu, S. A., Pace, A. B., Marshall, J., et al. 2021, ApJ, 916, 81, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0443

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac0443 2021

  13. [13]

    2007, A&A, 466, 181, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066825

    Carraro, G., Zinn, R., & Moni Bidin, C. 2007, A&A, 466, 181, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066825

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066825 2007

  14. [14]

    E., Drlica-Wagner, A., et al

    Cerny, W., Mart´ ınez-V´ azquez, C. E., Drlica-Wagner, A., et al. 2023, ApJ, 953, 1, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acdd78

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acdd78 2023

  15. [15]

    S., Pace, A

    Cerny, W., Li, T. S., Pace, A. B., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.17652, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.17652 A New Distant, Compact Milky Way Satellite in Gemini13

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.17652 2026

  16. [16]

    2001, ApJ, 554, 1274, doi: 10.1086/321401

    Chabrier, G. 2001, ApJ, 554, 1274, doi: 10.1086/321401

    work page doi:10.1086/321401 2001

  17. [17]

    C., Magnier, E

    Chambers, K. C., Magnier, E. A., Metcalfe, N., et al. 2016, ArXiv e-prints. https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.05560

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  18. [18]

    2015, MNRAS, 452, 1068, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1281

    Chen, Y., Bressan, A., Girardi, L., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 452, 1068, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1281

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1281 2015

  19. [19]

    2014, MNRAS, 444, 2525, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1605

    Chen, Y., Girardi, L., Bressan, A., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 2525, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1605

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1605 2014

  20. [20]

    C., Jerjen, H., Kim, D., & Schirmer, M

    Conn, B. C., Jerjen, H., Kim, D., & Schirmer, M. 2018, ApJ, 852, 68, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9eda DES Collaboration, Abbott, T., Abdalla, F. B., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 1270, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw641

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa9eda 2018

  21. [21]

    J., Lang, D., et al

    Dey, A., Schlegel, D. J., Lang, D., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 168, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab089d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab089d 2019

  22. [22]

    S., et al

    Drlica-Wagner, A., Bechtol, K., Rykoff, E. S., et al. 2015, ApJ, 813, 109, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/813/2/109

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/813/2/109 2015

  23. [23]

    2020, ApJ, 893, 47, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab7eb9

    Drlica-Wagner, A., Bechtol, K., Mau, S., et al. 2020, ApJ, 893, 47, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab7eb9

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab7eb9 2020

  24. [24]

    L., Nidever, D

    Drlica-Wagner, A., Carlin, J. L., Nidever, D. L., et al. 2021, ApJS, 256, 2, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac079d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac079d 2021

  25. [25]

    S., Adam´ ow, M., et al

    Drlica-Wagner, A., Ferguson, P. S., Adam´ ow, M., et al. 2022, ApJS, 261, 38, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac78eb

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac78eb 2022

  26. [26]

    2020, MNRAS, 491, 4591, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3349

    Errani, R., & Pe˜ narrubia, J. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 4591, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3349

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3349 2020

  27. [27]

    M., Phillips, A

    Faber, S. M., Phillips, A. C., Kibrick, R. I., et al. 2003, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 4841, Instrument Design and Performance for Optical/Infrared Ground-based Telescopes, ed. M. Iye & A. F. M. Moorwood, 1657–1669, doi: 10.1117/12.460346

    work page doi:10.1117/12.460346 2003

  28. [28]

    T., Honscheid, K., et al

    Flaugher, B., Diehl, H. T., Honscheid, K., et al. 2015, AJ, 150, 150, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/150/5/150

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/150/5/150 2015

  29. [29]

    and Lang, Dustin and Goodman, Jonathan , year=

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. 2013, PASP, 125, 306, doi: 10.1086/670067

    work page doi:10.1086/670067 2013

  30. [30]

    W., Weisz, D

    Fu, S. W., Weisz, D. R., Starkenburg, E., et al. 2023, ApJ, 958, 167, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0030

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad0030 2023

  31. [31]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.10202, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.10202

    Geha, M. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.10202, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.10202

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.10202 2026

  32. [32]

    X., et al

    Geha, M., Pelliccia, D., Prochaska, J. X., et al. 2026, ApJ, 999, 140, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae290d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae290d 2026

  33. [33]

    M., & Walker, M

    Geringer-Sameth, A., Koushiappas, S. M., & Walker, M. 2015, ApJ, 801, 74, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/801/2/74

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/801/2/74 2015

  34. [34]

    2014, AJ, 148, 53, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/148/3/53

    Gullikson, K., Dodson-Robinson, S., & Kraus, A. 2014, AJ, 148, 53, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/148/3/53

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/148/3/53 2014

  35. [35]

    Gutcke, T. A. 2024, ApJ, 971, 103, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5c62

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5c62 2024

  36. [36]

    W., Cuillandre, J.-C., et al

    Gwyn, S., McConnachie, A. W., Cuillandre, J.-C., et al. 2025, AJ, 170, 324, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ae03ab

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ae03ab 2025

  37. [37]

    2017, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Hirst, P., & Cardenes, R. 2017, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 512, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXV, ed. N. P. F

    2017

  38. [38]

    2019, PASJ, 71, 94, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psz076

    Homma, D., Chiba, M., Komiyama, Y., et al. 2019, PASJ, 71, 94, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psz076

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psz076 2019

  39. [39]

    2024, PASJ, 76, 733, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psae044

    Homma, D., Chiba, M., Komiyama, Y., et al. 2024, PASJ, 76, 733, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psae044

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psae044 2024

  40. [40]

    2013, A&A, 553, A6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219058 Ivezi´ c,ˇZ., Kahn, S

    Husser, T.-O., Wende-von Berg, S., Dreizler, S., et al. 2013, A&A, 553, A6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219058 Ivezi´ c,ˇZ., Kahn, S. M., Tyson, J. A., et al. 2019, ApJ, 873, 111, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219058 2013

  41. [41]

    N., Cohen, J

    Kirby, E. N., Cohen, J. G., Guhathakurta, P., et al. 2013, ApJ, 779, 102, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/779/2/102

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/779/2/102 2013

  42. [42]

    Koposov, S., de Jong, J. T. A., Belokurov, V., et al. 2007, ApJ, 669, 337, doi: 10.1086/521422

    work page doi:10.1086/521422 2007

  43. [43]

    E., Belokurov, V., Torrealba, G., & Evans, N

    Koposov, S. E., Belokurov, V., Torrealba, G., & Evans, N. W. 2015, ApJ, 805, 130, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/805/2/130

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/805/2/130 2015

  44. [44]

    Turner, J. E. H. 2019, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 523, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXVII, ed. P. J. Teuben, M. W. Pound, B. A. Thomas, & E. M. Warner, 321

    2019

  45. [45]

    Laevens, B. P. M., Martin, N. F., Ibata, R. A., et al. 2015a, ApJL, 802, L18, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/802/2/L18

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/802/2/l18 2041

  46. [46]

    Laevens, B. P. M., Martin, N. F., Bernard, E. J., et al. 2015b, ApJ, 813, 44, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/813/1/44

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/813/1/44

  47. [47]

    Ostheimer, J. C. 2003, ApJ, 599, 1082, doi: 10.1086/379504

    work page doi:10.1086/379504 2003

  48. [48]

    Manwadkar, V., & Kravtsov, A. V. 2022, MNRAS, 516, 3944, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2452

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2452 2022

  49. [49]

    F., de Jong, J

    Martin, N. F., de Jong, J. T. A., & Rix, H.-W. 2008, ApJ, 684, 1075, doi: 10.1086/590336 Mart´ ınez-V´ azquez, C. E., Salinas, R., & Vivas, A. K. 2021, AJ, 161, 120, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abd55e

    work page doi:10.1086/590336 2008

  50. [50]

    2023, MNRAS, 520, 5225, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad321

    Mateu, C. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 5225, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad321

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad321 2023

  51. [51]

    B., et al

    Mau, S., Cerny, W., Pace, A. B., et al. 2020, ApJ, 890, 136, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab6c67

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab6c67 2020

  52. [52]

    M., et al

    McDaniel, A., Ajello, M., Karwin, C. M., et al. 2024, PhRvD, 109, 063024, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.063024

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.063024 2024

  53. [53]

    McQuinn, K. B. W., Brown, A., Buckley, M., et al. 2025, Discovery of Very Low-Mass Galaxy Candidates within the Local Group,, HST Proposal. Cycle 33, ID. #18066

    2025

  54. [54]

    A., Menanteau, F., et al

    Morganson, E., Gruendl, R. A., Menanteau, F., et al. 2018, PASP, 130, 074501, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aab4ef

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aab4ef 2018

  55. [55]

    O., Wechsler, R

    Nadler, E. O., Wechsler, R. H., Bechtol, K., et al. 2020, ApJ, 893, 48, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab846a 14Overdeck et al. (DELVE Collaboration)

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab846a 2020

  56. [56]

    Navabi, M., Carrera, R., No¨ el, N. E. D., et al. 2026, MNRAS, 546, stag019, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stag019

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stag019 2026

  57. [57]

    A., Bridle, A

    Okamoto, T., Gao, L., & Theuns, T. 2008, MNRAS, 390, 920, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13830.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13830.x 2008

  58. [58]

    2013, MNRAS, 433, 1966, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt865

    Ortolani, S., Bica, E., & Barbuy, B. 2013, MNRAS, 433, 1966, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt865

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt865 2013

  59. [59]

    Pace, A. B. 2025, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 8, 142, doi: 10.33232/001c.144859

    work page doi:10.33232/001c.144859 2025

  60. [60]

    2014, AJ, 148, 19, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/148/1/19

    Paust, N., Wilson, D., & van Belle, G. 2014, AJ, 148, 19, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/148/1/19

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/148/1/19 2014

  61. [61]

    Plummer, H. C. 1911, MNRAS, 71, 460, doi: 10.1093/mnras/71.5.460

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/71.5.460 1911

  62. [62]

    The Journal of Open Source Software , keywords =

    Prochaska, J., Hennawi, J., Westfall, K., et al. 2020, The Journal of Open Source Software, 5, 2308, doi: 10.21105/joss.02308

    work page doi:10.21105/joss.02308 2020

  63. [63]

    Zaggia, S. R. 1998, AJ, 115, 648, doi: 10.1086/300200

    work page doi:10.1086/300200 1998

  64. [64]

    Santos-Santos, I. M. E., Frenk, C. S., & Navarro, J. F. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.09539, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.09539

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.09539 2026

  65. [65]

    Simon, J. D. 2019, ARA&A, 57, 375, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-091918-104453

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-091918-104453 2019

  66. [66]

    D., Brown, T

    Simon, J. D., Brown, T. M., Drlica-Wagner, A., et al. 2021, ApJ, 908, 18, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abd31b

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abd31b 2021

  67. [67]

    D., Li, T

    Simon, J. D., Li, T. S., Ji, A. P., et al. 2024, ApJ, 976, 256, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad85dd

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad85dd 2024

  68. [68]

    Smith, S. E. T., Jensen, J., Roediger, J., et al. 2023, AJ, 166, 76, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/acdd77

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/acdd77 2023

  69. [70]

    Smith, S. E. T., Cerny, W., Hayes, C. R., et al. 2024b, ApJ, 961, 92, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0d9f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad0d9f

  70. [71]

    Somerville, R. S. 2002, ApJL, 572, L23, doi: 10.1086/341444

    work page doi:10.1086/341444 2002

  71. [72]

    Speagle, J. S. 2020, MNRAS, 493, 3132, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa278

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa278 2020

  72. [73]

    Stetson, P. B. 1987, PASP, 99, 191, doi: 10.1086/131977

    work page doi:10.1086/131977 1987

  73. [74]

    Y., Cerny, W., Drlica-Wagner, A., et al

    Tan, C. Y., Cerny, W., Drlica-Wagner, A., et al. 2025, ApJ, 979, 176, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad9b0c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad9b0c 2025

  74. [76]

    Y., Cerny, W., Pace, A

    Tan, C. Y., Cerny, W., Pace, A. B., et al. 2026b, ApJ, 1000, 46, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae43e2

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae43e2

  75. [77]

    Y., Drlica-Wagner, A., Pace, A

    Tan, C. Y., Drlica-Wagner, A., Pace, A. B., et al. 2026c, ApJ, 1000, 87, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae4479

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae4479

  76. [78]

    2014, MNRAS, 445, 4287, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2029

    Tang, J., Bressan, A., Rosenfield, P., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 445, 4287, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2029

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2029 2014

  77. [79]

    D., Read, J

    Taylor, E. D., Read, J. I., Orkney, M. D. A., et al. 2025, Nature, 645, 327, doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09494-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09494-x 2025

  78. [80]

    2025, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 8, 89, doi: 10.33232/001c.142072

    Tsiane, K., Mau, S., Drlica-Wagner, A., et al. 2025, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 8, 89, doi: 10.33232/001c.142072

    work page doi:10.33232/001c.142072 2025

  79. [81]

    2021, MNRAS, 501, 2279, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3673

    Vasiliev, E., Belokurov, V., & Erkal, D. 2021, MNRAS, 501, 2279, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3673

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3673 2021

  80. [82]

    G., Mateo, M., Olszewski, E

    Walker, M. G., Mateo, M., Olszewski, E. W., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 2114, doi: 10.1086/500193

    work page doi:10.1086/500193 2006

Showing first 80 references.