Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 minor 1 cited by

How to grow a straight filament

T0 review · 0 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-06-27 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Nonlocal feedback stabilizes straight growth of a noisy filament using curvature sensing alone.

desk verdict The paper sketches a clean distinction between local and nonlocal feedback for stabilizing noisy filament growth but supplies no equations or checks to verify the stability claims. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.11080 v1 pith:PELTHINY submitted 2026-06-09 cond-mat.soft physics.bio-ph

Ludwig A. Hoffmann , L. Mahadevan This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softphysics.bio-ph
keywords growingfilamentmorphogenesisfeedbackcontrolelasticstabilitystochasticgrowthproprioceptionnonlocallinearanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets up a minimal model of an elastic filament whose growth rate at each point depends on its strain, curvature, and orientation, with the dependence allowed to be either strictly local or spread over space and time. Linear stability analysis of the straight state shows that additive noise excites long-wavelength bends unless the local feedback rule also senses absolute orientation; a nonlocal rule removes this requirement and stabilizes the filament through curvature sensing only. Attachment to an elastic substrate supplies an extra restoring force that damps the remaining large-scale fluctuations. These results identify the smallest sets of sensory and regulatory rules sufficient for reproducible straight morphogenesis. A reader cares because the same rules could explain how cells and tissues achieve precise linear shapes without central coordination.

What carries the argument

Minimal model of growth regulated by local or nonlocal spatiotemporal feedback on strain, curvature, and orientation.

What would settle it

Direct observation of a biological filament that grows straight using only local curvature feedback and no orientation sensing would falsify the necessity of orientation input for local rules.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

We formulate a minimal model in which growth responds to the filament's strain, curvature, and orientation through local or nonlocal spatiotemporal feedback laws. Linear stability analysis identifies the conditions under which these feedback mechanisms stabilize a straight configuration. In the presence of noise, we show that purely local feedback requires orientation sensing to suppress long-wavelength instabilities, whereas nonlocal feedback allows stabilization through proprioceptive (curvature) sensing alone. Coupling to an elastic substrate further suppresses large-scale fluctuations.

Load-bearing premise

The growth rate at each point is set by a linear combination of the filament's local strain, curvature, and orientation, with the combination allowed to be local or nonlocal.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Straight growth is possible with curvature sensing alone when feedback is nonlocal.
  • Local feedback always needs an extra orientation channel to eliminate long-wavelength instabilities.
  • Elastic coupling to a substrate damps the remaining large-scale fluctuations.
  • The two feedback classes produce distinct experimental signatures that can be used to identify the mechanism in real systems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same distinction between local and nonlocal rules may apply to other linear biological structures such as roots or hyphae.
  • Varying the spatial range of feedback experimentally should produce a sharp transition from unstable to stable growth.
  • The model predicts that noise amplitude and feedback range together set a critical wavelength below which bends are suppressed.
  • Nonlinear extensions could reveal whether the straight state remains attracting once large deflections appear.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that a minimal model of a growing elastic filament regulated by local or nonlocal feedback on strain, curvature, and orientation can be analyzed for stability using linear stability analysis. In the presence of noise, purely local feedback requires orientation sensing to suppress long-wavelength instabilities, whereas nonlocal feedback allows stabilization through proprioceptive (curvature) sensing alone. Coupling to an elastic substrate further suppresses large-scale fluctuations. The results establish minimal control strategies for robust straight growth and suggest experimental signatures.

Significance. If the result holds, the paper is significant for providing a theoretical framework to understand how biological filaments maintain straight growth despite stochastic fluctuations. The distinction between local and nonlocal feedback mechanisms offers insights into the role of sensing in morphogenesis. The identification of minimal strategies and experimental signatures is valuable for the field of soft matter and biophysics.

minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract provides a high-level description of the linear stability analysis and noise model but does not include specific equations or the form of the feedback laws, which would help readers assess the claims immediately.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary of our work and for recommending minor revision. The assessment correctly identifies the key distinctions between local and nonlocal feedback mechanisms and their implications for stabilizing straight growth under noise. No specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; model and analysis are self-contained

full rationale

The paper formulates a minimal model of growth response to strain/curvature/orientation via local or nonlocal feedback, then applies linear stability analysis to derive stabilization conditions under noise. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to its inputs, no self-citation chains justify uniqueness or ansatzes, and no fitted parameters are relabeled as predictions. The derivation chain begins from the stated physical model and proceeds mathematically without circular reduction, consistent with the reader's assessment of score 2.0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no explicit free parameters, additional axioms, or invented entities are stated. The central modeling choice is treated as a domain assumption.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Growth rate of the elastic filament responds to its strain, curvature, and orientation via local or nonlocal spatiotemporal feedback laws.
    This is the explicit starting formulation of the minimal model given in the abstract.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of How to grow a straight filament." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PELTHINY

@misc{pith2026260611080,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: How to grow a straight filament},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PELTHINY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.11080}
}
read the original abstract

How can a growing biological filament remain straight despite stochastic fluctuations in growth? Motivated by filamentary structures that develop reproducibly across biological systems, we study the stability of a noisy, growing elastic filament regulated by feedback. We formulate a minimal model in which growth responds to the filament's strain, curvature, and orientation through local or nonlocal spatiotemporal feedback laws. Linear stability analysis identifies the conditions under which these feedback mechanisms stabilize a straight configuration. In the presence of noise, we show that purely local feedback requires orientation sensing to suppress long-wavelength instabilities, whereas nonlocal feedback allows stabilization through proprioceptive (curvature) sensing alone. Coupling to an elastic substrate further suppresses large-scale fluctuations. Our results establish minimal control strategies that ensure robust straight growth and suggest experimental signatures for identifying the feedback mechanisms underlying morphogenesis.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.11080 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The most common interoceptive mechanisms in this context are proprioception (sensing one’s own shape) and strain sensing. The former has been shown to be re￾quired for the straight growth of plant shoots and verte￾brate spines [9–13], as well as for posture control [14– 16]; see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Theoretical model. (a) Sketch of an elastic fila￾ment in two-dimensional space (x, z) described by the coor￾dinate s. The filament’s orientation is described by an angle θ(s) and it can grow in-line (ϵg) and out-of-line (κg). The filament is coupled to a substrate at height w = 0 through “springs” of stiffness k (see Eq. (1)), and there is a preferred orientation θp. (b) Sketch of our framework, in which an elastic … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Local, instantaneous feedback. (a) The real (top) and imaginary (bottom) parts of the eigenvalues for dif￾ferent parameter values, with fϵ = gθ = 1, obtained from the stability matrix given by Eq. (7). The coefficients fi and gi denote feedback from the state variables i ∈ {ϵ, θ, κ} onto axial and curvature growth, respectively. ¯fi ∝ figϵ is the rescaled parameter with “coupling” gϵ. (b) The stability dia￾gram summ… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Nonlocal feedback. (a) Stability diagram for nonlocal feedback in the limit where local feedback is negligi￾ble (fi = gi = 0), with φ¯κ = φκγϵ rescaled by the “coupling” γϵ. We choose φϵ = 1 here; see SM Sec. SIV for a differ￾ent choice. The axes γκ and φ¯κ denote the …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Growth and remodeling control shape memory in morphogenetic rods

    cond-mat.soft 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    In a visco-elasto-plastic rod, an intermediate remodeling rate preserves an encoded shape best, and uniform growth rescues shape memory by suppressing both elastic coarsening and noise-driven disorder.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    coupling

    =θ p. Local, instantaneous feedback—Fork= 0, correspond- ing to no coupling to a substrate, Eqs. (2) and (3) can be combined into ∂s∂tV= Z G·Vds ′dt′ +χ(s, t),(5) 3 Figure 3.Local, instantaneous feedback.(a) The real (top) and imaginary (bottom) parts of the eigenvalues for dif- ferent parameter values, withf ϵ =g θ = 1, obtained from the stability matrix...

  2. [5]

    Naoki, R

    H. Naoki, R. Akiyama, D. W. K. Sari, S. Ishii, Y. Bessho, and T. Matsui, PLoS Comput. Biol.15, e1006579 (2019)

    2019

  3. [6]

    LeGoff and T

    L. LeGoff and T. Lecuit, Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.8, a019232 (2016)

    2016

  4. [7]

    W. G. Chen, D. Schloesser, A. M. Arensdorf, J. M. Sim- mons, C. Cui, R. Valentino, J. W. Gnadt, L. Nielsen, C. S. Hillaire-Clarke, V. Spruance, T. S. Horowitz, Y. F. Vallejo, and H. M. Langevin, Trends Neurosci.44, 3 (2021)

    2021

  5. [8]

    Harmansa and T

    S. Harmansa and T. Lecuit, Cells Dev.168, 203750 (2021)

    2021

  6. [9]

    Valet, E

    M. Valet, E. D. Siggia, and A. H. Brivanlou, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.23, 169 (2022)

    2022

  7. [11]

    Meroz, R

    Y. Meroz, R. Bastien, and L. Mahadevan, J. R. Soc. In- terface16, 20190038 (2019)

    2019

  8. [13]

    B. R. Troutwine, P. Gontarz, M. J. Konjikusic, R. Mi- 7 nowa, A. Monstad-Rios, D. S. Sepich, R. Y. Kwon, L. Solnica-Krezel, and R. S. Gray, Curr. Biol.30, 2353 (2020)

    2020

Show all 50 references
  1. [14]

    Wyart, M

    C. Wyart, M. Carbo-Tano, Y. Cantaut-Belarif, A. Orts- Del’Immagine, and U. L. Böhm, Nat. Rev. Neurosci.24, 540 (2023)

    2023

  2. [15]

    Blecher, S

    R. Blecher, S. Krief, T. Galili, I. E. Biton, T. Stern, E.Assaraf, D.Levanon, E.Appel, Y.Anekstein, G.Agar, Y. Groner, and E. Zelzer, Dev. Cell42, 388 (2017)

    2017

  3. [16]

    Bornstein, N

    B. Bornstein, N. Konstantin, C. Alessandro, M. C. Tresch, and E. Zelzer, Curr. Opin. Physiol.20, 77 (2021)

    2021

  4. [17]

    L. A. Hoffmann, P. Bryde, I. C. Davenport, S. G. Prasath, B. C. Jayne, and L. Mahadevan, J. R. Soc. In- terface23, 20250314 (2026)

    2026

  5. [18]

    Ladoux and R.-M

    B. Ladoux and R.-M. Mège, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 743 (2017)

    2017

  6. [21]

    Okamoto, H

    K. Okamoto, H. Ueda, T. Shimada, K. Tamura, T. Kato, M. Tasaka, M. T. Morita, and I. Hara-Nishimura, Nat. Plants1, 1 (2015)

    2015

  7. [23]

    Haas and D

    P. Haas and D. Gilmour, Dev. Cell10, 673 (2006)

    2006

  8. [24]

    E. T. Stoeckli, Development145, dev151415 (2018)

    2018

  9. [25]

    Forghani, A

    R. Forghani, A. Chandrasekaran, G. Papoian, and E. Giniger, Open Biol.13, 220359 (2023)

    2023

  10. [26]

    H. Y. Fang, R. Forghani, A. Clarke, P. G. McQueen, A. Chandrasekaran, K. M. O’Neill, W. Losert, G. A. Pa- poian, and E. Giniger, Mol. Biol. Cell34, ar83 (2023)

    2023

  11. [27]

    Nakayama, R

    N. Nakayama, R. S. Smith, T. Mandel, S. Robinson, S. Kimura, A. Boudaoud, and C. Kuhlemeier, Curr. Biol. 22, 1468 (2012)

    2012

  12. [33]

    Armon, M

    While a scale-dependent noise spectrum may be more re- alistic (see, e.g., S. Armon, M. Moshe, and E. Sharon, Commun. Phys.4, 1 (2021)), we restrict ourselves to white noise for simplicity

    2021

  13. [34]

    R. L. Antoniou Kourounioti, L. R. Band, J. A. Fozard, A. Hampstead, A. Lovrics, E. Moyroud, S. Vignolini, J. R. King, O. E. Jensen, and B. J. Glover, J. R. Soc. Interface10, 20120847 (2013). Supplementary Materials: How to grow a straight filament L. A. Hoffmann School of Engi...

    2013

  14. [35]

    Eigenvalue formulas 6

  15. [36]

    Non-dimensional expressions 7

    Asymptotic limits of eigenvalues 6 B. Non-dimensional expressions 7

  16. [37]

    Eigenvalue formulas 8

  17. [38]

    Noisy equations: Simple scaling analysis 9 SIV

    Asymptotic limits of eigenvalues 8 C. Noisy equations: Simple scaling analysis 9 SIV. Nonlocal Feedback 9 A. Deterministic case 9

  18. [39]

    Eigenvalue formulas 9

  19. [40]

    up” and “down

    Asymptotic limits of eigenvalues 10 B. Noisy equations 12 SV. Elastic substrate 13 References 14 ∗ lmahadev@g.harvard.edu 2 SI. PARAMETERS AND DYNAMIC EQUATIONS A. Table of Parameters Parameter/field Meaning Parameter/field Meaning S Elastic stretching coefficient w(s, t) Out-...

  20. [41]

    Eigenvalue formulas Using the ansatz u=u 0eiqs+λt andθ=θ 0eiqs+λt (S16) in ∂t∂su(s, t)≃ −f ϵ∂su(s, t)−f θθ(s, t)−f κ∂sθ(s, t),(S17a) ∂t∂sθ(s, t)≃ −g ϵ∂su(s, t)−g θθ(s, t)−g κ∂sθ(s, t),(S17b) cf. Eqs. (S13), it is possible to write this system of equations compactly as [λ1−K]·V...

  21. [42]

    Asymptotic limits of eigenvalues We now consider the asymptotic limitsq→0,∞to analyze the stability of the system at long and short length scales. For short length scales, expanding aboutq=∞gives the following lowest-order expressions for the real and 7 Figure S3.3D stability ...

  22. [43]

    Eigenvalue formulas Using the rescaled parameters defined above,˜gκ =g κ/fϵ,˜gϵ =g ϵ/gθ, ˜fθ =f θ˜gϵ/fϵ, and ˜fκ =f κ˜gϵgθ/f2 ϵ, as well as the dimensionless variables˜q=qf ϵ/gθ and ˜λ=λ/f ϵ, we can write h ˜λ1− ˜K i · ˜V= 0with ˜K(˜q) =− 1 ˜fκ−i ˜fθ/˜q ˜gϵ ˜gϵ ˜gκ − i ˜q ! (S...

  23. [44]

    On the other hand, iff ϵ <0, then we have to consider Re ˜λ >0to find the parameter space where Reλ <0

    Asymptotic limits of eigenvalues The asymptotic limits are found to be ˜λRS 1,2 =Re h ˜λ1,2 i ˜q→∞ =− 1 + ˜gκ 2 ± 1 2Re q 4 ˜fκ + (˜gκ −1) 2 +O ˜q−1 ,(S26a) ˜λIS 1,2 =Im h ˜λ1,2 i ˜q→∞ =∓ 1 2Im q 4 ˜fκ + (˜gκ −1) 2 +O ˜q−1 ,(S26b) ˜λRL 1,2 =Re h ˜λ1,2 i ˜q→0 =− ˜gκ + 1 2 ∓ 1−2...

  24. [45]

    (S33) withfi =g i =φ i =γ i = 1for alliandΓ = 1

    Eigenvalue formulas As before, in the absence of noise we can write the equations compactly as[λ1−K]·V= 0, where now K(q, λ) = −fϵ − φϵ (Γ+λ)q2 ifθ q + iφθ (Γ+λ)q3 −f κ − φκ (Γ+λ)q2 −gϵ − γϵ (Γ+λ)q2 igθ q + iγθ (Γ+λ)q3 −g κ − γκ (Γ+λ)q2 ! ,(S32) 10 Figure S5.Diverging and fini...

  25. [46]

    IfΓ<0the system is always unstable

    Asymptotic limits of eigenvalues Forq→ ∞, the expressions simplify significantly, and the solutions read: λ1,2,3,4 = 1 4 −fϵ −g κ −2Γ +C 1,2 ∓ q (fϵ +g κ −2Γ− C 1,2)2 +O q−1 ,(S34a) where C1,2 =∓ p 4fκgϵ + (gκ −f ϵ)2 .(S34b) We find that Reλ1,2,3,4 ≤0if the same conditions as ...

  26. [47]

    Efrati, E

    E. Efrati, E. Sharon, and R. Kupferman, J. Mech. Phys. Solids57, 762 (2009)

    2009

  27. [48]

    Liang and L

    H. Liang and L. Mahadevan, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.106, 22049 (2009)

    2009

  28. [49]

    al-Mosleh and L

    S. al-Mosleh and L. Mahadevan, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 098401 (2023)

    2023

  29. [50]

    Bastien, T

    R. Bastien, T. Bohr, B. Moulia, and S. Douady, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.110, 755 (2013)

    2013

  30. [51]

    L. Hong, M. Dumond, M. Zhu, S. Tsugawa, C.-B. Li, A. Boudaoud, O. Hamant, and A. H. K. Roeder, Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.69, 469 (2018)

    2018

  31. [52]

    Moulia, S

    B. Moulia, S. Douady, and O. Hamant, Science372, eabc6868 (2021)

    2021

  32. [53]

    Armon, M

    S. Armon, M. Moshe, and E. Sharon, Commun. Phys.4, 1 (2021)

    2021

  33. [54]

    B. I. Shraiman, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.102, 3318 (2005)

    2005

  34. [55]

    O. K. Damavandi and D. K. Lubensky, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.116, 5350 (2019)

    2019

  35. [56]

    Okamoto, H

    K. Okamoto, H. Ueda, T. Shimada, K. Tamura, T. Kato, M. Tasaka, M. T. Morita, and I. Hara-Nishimura, Nat. Plants 1, 1 (2015)

    2015

  36. [57]

    Bérut, H

    A. Bérut, H. Chauvet, V. Legué, B. Moulia, O. Pouliquen, and Y. Forterre, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.115, 5123 (2018)

    2018

  37. [58]

    Hamant, D

    O. Hamant, D. Inoue, D. Bouchez, J. Dumais, and E. Mjolsness, Nat. Commun.10, 2360 (2019)

    2019

  38. [59]

    Chelakkot and L

    R. Chelakkot and L. Mahadevan, J. R. Soc. Interface14, 20170001 (2017)

    2017

  39. [60]

    Meroz, R

    Y. Meroz, R. Bastien, and L. Mahadevan, J. R. Soc. Interface16, 20190038 (2019)

    2019

  40. [61]

    Nakayama, R

    N. Nakayama, R. S. Smith, T. Mandel, S. Robinson, S. Kimura, A. Boudaoud, and C. Kuhlemeier, Curr. Biol.22, 1468 (2012)

    2012

  41. [62]

    Jonsson, Y

    K. Jonsson, Y. Ma, A.-L. Routier-Kierzkowska, and R. P. Bhalerao, Nat. Plants9, 13 (2022)

    2022

  42. [63]

    S. Xu, X. He, D.-C. Trinh, X. Zhang, X. Wu, D. Qiu, M. Zhou, D. Xiang, A. H. K. Roeder, O. Hamant, and L. Hong, Curr. Biol.34, 4007 (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed June 27, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.