pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.11954 · v1 · pith:VMSFIFN3new · submitted 2026-06-10 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · physics.app-ph

Boron Co-Alloying in AlScN Wurtzite Ferroelectrics: Insights from an 850-Sample Combinatorial Study

Federica Messi (1 , 2) , Nathan Rodkey (1) , Manuel Kober-Czerny (1) , Sebastian Siol (1) ((1) Laboratory for Surface Science , Coating Technologies , Empa - Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science , Technology
show 5 more authors
D\"ubendorf Switzerland (2) Department of Materials ETH Z\"urich Zurich Switzerland)
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 09:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.app-ph
keywords AlScBNwurtzite ferroelectricscoercive fieldremanent polarizationcombinatorial depositionbond ionicitycycling endurance
0
0 comments X

The pith

Boron co-alloying reduces coercive field in AlScN from 7 MV/cm to 3 MV/cm while keeping 130-150 μC/cm² polarization.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that adding boron to AlScN creates AlScBN films where the coercive field drops sharply with less scandium required. These films keep a high remanent polarization of 130-150 μC/cm² and show better cycling endurance tied to lower defect density. A combinatorial screen of 850 samples maps the full composition range and links the field reduction to bond ionicity via XPS charge transfer data. Opposite ionicity trends appear in the AlBN system. The results point to AlScBN as a practical ferroelectric for memory devices.

Core claim

Co-doping AlScN wurtzite ferroelectrics with boron produces AlScBN in which the coercive field falls from 7 MV/cm to 3 MV/cm at a remanent polarization of 130-150 μC/cm². Boron co-alloying lowers the scandium content required for this reduction and raises cycling endurance by lowering defect density. XPS charge transfer analysis confirms that bond ionicity tracks the coercive field reduction in the AlScN and AlScBN systems.

What carries the argument

Combinatorial gradient deposition with HiPIMS at 250°C creating 850 unique AlScBN samples, with automatic property analysis and XPS charge transfer analysis linking bond ionicity to coercive field reduction.

Load-bearing premise

The drop in coercive field is caused by the bond ionicity change measured by XPS, and the endurance gain is caused by lower defect density rather than other unmeasured factors.

What would settle it

Fabricate AlScBN films with the same composition but independently varied bond ionicity and measure whether coercive field still tracks the ionicity value.

read the original abstract

AlScN wurtzite ferroelectrics are promising candidates for energy-efficient non-volatile memory. However, AlScN suffers from a high coercive field and reduced cycling endurance, and the limited tunability of its properties constrains further optimization. Co-doping AlScN with boron offers the promise of independently tailoring the chemical and structural properties, making AlScBN an attractive quaternary system. This material has already been explored for a few selected compositions, however, no systematic study of the full AlScBN compositional space exists. A combinatorial approach consisting of gradient deposition with HiPIMS at low temperatures of 250{\deg}C and automatic analysis of film properties allowed us to analyze a total of 850 unique samples within the AlScBN phase space. In addition to a full screening of the materials' chemical and structural properties, we fabricate and characterize combinatorial device libraries. XPS charge transfer analysis experimentally confirms that bond ionicity correlates with a reduction in the coercive field for AlScN and AlScBN systems, opposite trends are instead observed for AlBN. While the films maintain a high remanent polarization of 130-150 {\mu}C/cm2, Sc and B co-doping reduces the coercive field from 7 MV/cm to 3 MV/cm. Notably, B co-alloying lowers the amount of Sc needed to lower the coercive field, reducing reliance on this scarce element. In addition, we find that co-alloying with B, notably improves cycling endurance, which is related to a reduction in defect density. These results establish AlScBN as a scalable, CMOS-compatible ferroelectric, positioning it as an interesting alternative to AlScN.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a combinatorial library of 850 AlScBN wurtzite thin-film samples grown by HiPIMS at 250 °C. It claims that B co-alloying with Sc lowers the coercive field from 7 MV/cm to 3 MV/cm while preserving remanent polarization of 130–150 μC/cm², reduces the Sc fraction required for Ec reduction, and improves cycling endurance; XPS charge-transfer data are presented as evidence that increased bond ionicity drives the Ec drop, while endurance gains are attributed to lower defect density.

Significance. If the reported compositional trends and device metrics are reproducible, the work supplies a large-scale experimental map of the AlScBN quaternary space and identifies a practical route to lower Ec and Sc usage in CMOS-compatible ferroelectrics while maintaining high Pr. The combinatorial methodology itself constitutes a useful data resource for the field.

major comments (3)
  1. [XPS charge transfer analysis and Ec correlation] The central claim that XPS-derived bond ionicity is the operative mechanism for the observed Ec reduction (abstract and discussion of charge-transfer analysis) rests on correlation across the library; the manuscript does not report controls that isolate ionicity from co-varying parameters such as c-axis lattice constant, residual stress, or grain-size distributions that also change with B and Sc content.
  2. [Endurance and defect-density discussion] The statement that B co-alloying improves endurance “related to a reduction in defect density” (abstract) is presented without a quantitative defect metric (e.g., trap density from C–V, leakage activation energy, or dislocation counts from TEM) or a demonstration that this metric, rather than other co-varying film properties, predicts the endurance data.
  3. [Combinatorial device libraries and ferroelectric characterization] The headline device result (Ec drop from 7 MV/cm to 3 MV/cm at Pr = 130–150 μC/cm²) is reported for the combinatorial device libraries, yet the manuscript provides neither raw P–E loop statistics, error bars on the 850-sample trends, nor a description of how many devices per composition were measured to support the quoted values.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and results comparison] The abstract states that “opposite trends are instead observed for AlBN,” but the main text should explicitly reference the corresponding figure or table that displays the AlBN data for direct comparison.
  2. [Experimental methods] Deposition temperature is given as 250 °C; the methods section should clarify whether this is the substrate temperature or the nominal process temperature and whether any post-anneal was applied before device fabrication.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough and constructive review. We address each major comment below, indicating where revisions will be made to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that XPS-derived bond ionicity is the operative mechanism for the observed Ec reduction (abstract and discussion of charge-transfer analysis) rests on correlation across the library; the manuscript does not report controls that isolate ionicity from co-varying parameters such as c-axis lattice constant, residual stress, or grain-size distributions that also change with B and Sc content.

    Authors: We agree that the XPS analysis demonstrates a correlation between bond ionicity and Ec but does not isolate ionicity from co-varying structural parameters. In the revised manuscript we will explicitly qualify the claim as correlative, expand the discussion section to address the possible contributions of lattice constant, stress, and grain size, and note that ionicity is proposed as one contributing mechanism consistent with the observed trends. revision: partial

  2. Referee: The statement that B co-alloying improves endurance “related to a reduction in defect density” (abstract) is presented without a quantitative defect metric (e.g., trap density from C–V, leakage activation energy, or dislocation counts from TEM) or a demonstration that this metric, rather than other co-varying film properties, predicts the endurance data.

    Authors: The referee correctly identifies that no quantitative defect metric is provided. We will revise the abstract and main text to remove the direct attribution to defect-density reduction and instead report the observed endurance improvement with B co-alloying as an empirical finding, noting that the underlying mechanism requires further investigation. revision: yes

  3. Referee: The headline device result (Ec drop from 7 MV/cm to 3 MV/cm at Pr = 130–150 μC/cm²) is reported for the combinatorial device libraries, yet the manuscript provides neither raw P–E loop statistics, error bars on the 850-sample trends, nor a description of how many devices per composition were measured to support the quoted values.

    Authors: We acknowledge the need for greater statistical transparency. In the revision we will add error bars to the compositional trends, specify the number of devices measured per composition (typically 5–10 devices), and include representative raw P–E loop statistics or supplementary figures to support the reported Ec and Pr values. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental combinatorial study with no derivations or fitted predictions

full rationale

The manuscript is an experimental materials study reporting compositional trends, XPS measurements, ferroelectric properties, and endurance data across an 850-sample library. No equations, first-principles derivations, parameter fits presented as predictions, or self-citation chains appear in the provided text. Claims rest on direct observations and correlations (e.g., ionicity vs. Ec), which are falsifiable by additional experiments rather than reducing to the inputs by construction. This matches the default expectation for non-circular experimental work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest entirely on experimental measurements from combinatorial libraries; no free parameters, mathematical axioms, or new postulated entities are invoked in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Wurtzite crystal structure is retained across the studied AlScBN compositions, enabling ferroelectric switching.
    This structural assumption is required for the reported polarization and coercive-field values to be interpreted as ferroelectric behavior.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5915 in / 1232 out tokens · 25501 ms · 2026-06-27T09:07:52.006338+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Wurtzite and fluorite ferroelectric materials for electronic memory,

    K. H. Kim, I. Karpov, R. H. Olsson, and D. Jariwala, “Wurtzite and fluorite ferroelectric materials for electronic memory,” Nature Nanotechnology 2023 18:5, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 422–441, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41565-023-01361-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41565-023-01361-y 2023

  2. [2]

    Energy and AI wind energy,

    IEA, “Energy and AI wind energy,” Paris, France, 2025

    2025

  3. [3]

    Dawn of nitride ferroelectric semiconductors: from materials to devices,

    P. Wang, D. Wang, S. Mondal, M. Hu, J. Liu, and Z. Mi, “Dawn of nitride ferroelectric semiconductors: from materials to devices,” Semiconductor Science and Technology, vol. 38, no. 4, p. 043002, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1088/1361-6641/ACB80E

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6641/acb80e 2023

  4. [4]

    New-Generation Ferroelectric AlScN Materials,

    Y. Zhang, Q. Zhu, B. Tian, and C. Duan, “New-Generation Ferroelectric AlScN Materials,” Nano-Micro Letters, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 227, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s40820-024-01441-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s40820-024-01441-1 2024

  5. [5]

    Next generation ferroelectric materials for semiconductor process integration and their applications,

    T. Mikolajick et al., “Next generation ferroelectric materials for semiconductor process integration and their applications,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 129, no. 10, p. 100901, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1063/5.0037617

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0037617 2021

  6. [6]

    Examining the ferroelectric characteristics of aluminum nitride-based thin films,

    B. Deng, Y. Zhang, and Y. Shi, “Examining the ferroelectric characteristics of aluminum nitride-based thin films,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 1571–1581, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1111/JACE.19540

    work page doi:10.1111/jace.19540 2024

  7. [7]

    AlScN: A III-V semiconductor based ferroelectric,

    S. Fichtner, N. Wolff, F. Lofink, L. Kienle, and B. Wagner, “AlScN: A III-V semiconductor based ferroelectric,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 125, no. 11, p. 114103, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1063/1.5084945

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5084945 2019

  8. [8]

    Ferroelectricity in boron-substituted aluminum nitride thin films,

    J. Hayden et al., “Ferroelectricity in boron-substituted aluminum nitride thin films,” Physical Review Materials, vol. 5, no. 4, p. 044412, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.044412

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevmaterials.5.044412 2021

  9. [9]

    B. Y. R. D. Shannon, M. H, N. H. Baur, O. H. Gibbs, M. Eu, and V. Cu, “Revised Effective Ionic Radii and Systematic Studies of Interatomie Distances in Halides and Chaleogenides Central Research and Development Department , Experimental Station , E . L Du Pont de Nemours The effective ionic radii of Shannon & Prewitt [ Acta ,” 1976

    1976

  10. [10]

    Emerging materials and design principles for wurtzite-type ferroelectrics,

    C.-W. Lee, N. U. Din, K. Yazawa, G. L. Brennecka, A. Zakutayev, and P. Gorai, “Emerging materials and design principles for wurtzite-type ferroelectrics,” Matter, vol. 7, pp. 1644–1659, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.matt.2024.02.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matt.2024.02.001 2024

  11. [11]

    Demonstration and STEM Analysis of Ferroelectric Switching in MOCVD‐Grown Single Crystalline Al 0.85 Sc 0.15 N ,

    N. Wolff et al., “ Demonstration and STEM Analysis of Ferroelectric Switching in MOCVD‐Grown Single Crystalline Al 0.85 Sc 0.15 N ,” Advanced Physics Research, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 1–8, 2024, doi: 10.1002/apxr.202300113

    work page doi:10.1002/apxr.202300113 2024

  12. [12]

    From Fully Strained to Relaxed: Epitaxial Ferroelectric Al1- F. Messi et al., Empa, 2026 19 xScxN for III-N Technology,

    G. Schönweger et al., “From Fully Strained to Relaxed: Epitaxial Ferroelectric Al1- F. Messi et al., Empa, 2026 19 xScxN for III-N Technology,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 32, no. 21, p. 2109632, May 2022, doi: 10.1002/ADFM.202109632

    work page doi:10.1002/adfm.202109632 2026

  13. [13]

    Ferroelectric AlScN thin films with enhanced polarization and low leakage enabled by high-power impulse magnetron sputtering,

    F. Messi, J. Patidar, N. Rodkey, C. W. Dräyer, M. Trassin, and S. Siol, “Ferroelectric AlScN thin films with enhanced polarization and low leakage enabled by high-power impulse magnetron sputtering,” APL Materials, vol. 13, no. 5, p. 51123, May 2025, doi: 10.1063/5.0267904

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0267904 2025

  14. [14]

    Al1−xBxN Ferroelectric Thin Films: Research Progress and Prospects for Engineering Applications,

    J. Zhang, Z. Pan, Y. Guo, M. Chu, M. Q. Khokhar, and J. Yi, “Al1−xBxN Ferroelectric Thin Films: Research Progress and Prospects for Engineering Applications,” Physica Status Solidi (A) Applications and Materials Science, vol. 223, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2026, doi: 10.1002/pssa.202500561

    work page doi:10.1002/pssa.202500561 2026

  15. [15]

    Ferroelectric Al1−xBxN thin films integrated on Si,

    J. Hayden, J. Shepard, and J. P. Maria, “Ferroelectric Al1−xBxN thin films integrated on Si,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 123, no. 7, pp. 0–6, 2023, doi: 10.1063/5.0156606

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0156606 2023

  16. [16]

    Effect of boron concentration on local structure and spontaneous polarization in AlBN thin films,

    S. Calderon V, J. Hayden, M. Delower, J. P. Maria, and E. C. Dickey, “Effect of boron concentration on local structure and spontaneous polarization in AlBN thin films,” APL Materials, vol. 12, no. 2, 2024, doi: 10.1063/5.0179942

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0179942 2024

  17. [17]

    Implications of heterostructural alloying for enhanced piezoelectric performance of (Al,Sc)N,

    K. R. Talley et al., “Implications of heterostructural alloying for enhanced piezoelectric performance of (Al,Sc)N,” Physical Review Materials, vol. 2, no. 6, p. 063802, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.063802

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevmaterials.2.063802 2018

  18. [18]

    Leakage Suppression Across Temperature in Al1-xScxN Thin Film Ferroelectric Capacitors through Boron Incorporation,

    P. Yousefian, X. Tong, J. Tan, D. K. Pradhan, D. Jariwala, and R. H. Olsson, “Leakage Suppression Across Temperature in Al1-xScxN Thin Film Ferroelectric Capacitors through Boron Incorporation,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 1545– 1548, 2025, doi: 10.1109/LED.2025.3587950

    work page doi:10.1109/led.2025.3587950 2025

  19. [19]

    Piezoelectric and ferroelectric measurements on casted target-deposited Al0.45 Sc0.45 B0.1 N thin films,

    K. Saha, P. Simeoni, L. Colombo, and M. Rinaldi, “Piezoelectric and ferroelectric measurements on casted target-deposited Al0.45 Sc0.45 B0.1 N thin films,” Frontiers in Materials, vol. 12, no. April, pp. 1–13, 2025, doi: 10.3389/fmats.2025.1567614

    work page doi:10.3389/fmats.2025.1567614 2025

  20. [20]

    Sputtered ferroelectric aluminum scandium boron nitride (Al1−x−yBxScyN)/n-GaN heterostructures,

    C. Skidmore et al., “Sputtered ferroelectric aluminum scandium boron nitride (Al1−x−yBxScyN)/n-GaN heterostructures,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 138, no. 1, p. 14101, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1063/5.0250995

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0250995 2025

  21. [21]

    Tutorial: Reactive high power impulse magnetron sputtering (R- HiPIMS),

    A. Anders, “Tutorial: Reactive high power impulse magnetron sputtering (R- HiPIMS),” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 121, no. 17, p. 171101, May 2017, doi: 10.1063/1.4978350

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4978350 2017

  22. [22]

    Paradigm shift in thin-film growth by magnetron sputtering: From gas-ion to metal-ion irradiation of the growing film,

    G. Greczynski, I. Petrov, J. E. Greene, and L. Hultman, “Paradigm shift in thin-film growth by magnetron sputtering: From gas-ion to metal-ion irradiation of the growing film,” Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A, vol. 37, no. 6, p. 060801, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1116/1.5121226. F. Messi et al., Empa, 2026 20

    work page doi:10.1116/1.5121226 2019

  23. [23]

    Improving the crystallinity and texture of oblique-angle-deposited AlN thin films using reactive synchronized HiPIMS,

    J. Patidar et al., “Improving the crystallinity and texture of oblique-angle-deposited AlN thin films using reactive synchronized HiPIMS,” Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 468, p. 129719, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2023.129719

    work page doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2023.129719 2023

  24. [24]

    T. B. Massalski., Structure and stability of alloys., Fourth, Re. Elsevier B.V., 1996. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-89875-3.50007-7

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-89875-3.50007-7 1996

  25. [25]

    Growth of Highly c-Axis Oriented AlScN Films on Commercial Substrates,

    J. Su et al., “Growth of Highly c-Axis Oriented AlScN Films on Commercial Substrates,” Micromachines, vol. 13, no. 5, p. 783, May 2022, doi: 10.3390/mi13050783

    work page doi:10.3390/mi13050783 2022

  26. [26]

    High Quality Co-Sputtering AlScN Thin Films for Piezoelectric Lamb-Wave Resonators,

    S. Shao, Z. Luo, Y. Lu, A. Mazzalai, C. Tosi, and T. Wu, “High Quality Co-Sputtering AlScN Thin Films for Piezoelectric Lamb-Wave Resonators,” Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 328–337, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1109/JMEMS.2022.3161055

    work page doi:10.1109/jmems.2022.3161055 2022

  27. [27]

    Wurtzite ScAlN, InAlN, and GaAlN crystals, a comparison of structural, elastic, dielectric, and piezoelectric properties,

    O. Ambacher et al., “Wurtzite ScAlN, InAlN, and GaAlN crystals, a comparison of structural, elastic, dielectric, and piezoelectric properties,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 130, no. 4, 2021, doi: 10.1063/5.0048647

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0048647 2021

  28. [28]

    Local chemical origin of ferroelectric behavior in wurtzite nitrides,

    K. Yazawa, J. S. Mangum, P. Gorai, G. L. Brennecka, and A. Zakutayev, “Local chemical origin of ferroelectric behavior in wurtzite nitrides,” Journal of Materials Chemistry C, vol. 10, no. 46, pp. 17557–17566, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1039/D2TC02682A

    work page doi:10.1039/d2tc02682a 2022

  29. [29]

    Binding energy referencing in X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy,

    G. Greczynski and L. Hultman, “Binding energy referencing in X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy,” Nature Reviews Materials, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 62–78, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41578-024-00743-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41578-024-00743-5 2024

  30. [30]

    Accessing the robustness of adventitious carbon for charge referencing (correction) purposes in XPS analysis: Insights from a multi-user facility data review,

    M. C. Biesinger, “Accessing the robustness of adventitious carbon for charge referencing (correction) purposes in XPS analysis: Insights from a multi-user facility data review,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 597, p. 153681, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.153681

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.153681 2022

  31. [31]

    X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: Towards reliable binding energy referencing,

    G. Greczynski and L. Hultman, “X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: Towards reliable binding energy referencing,” Jan. 01, 2020, Elsevier Ltd. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.100591

    work page doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.100591 2020

  32. [33]

    Discovering Stable Amorphous Ceramics: From Computational Prediction to Thin‐Film Synthesis,

    O. V Pshyk et al., “Discovering Stable Amorphous Ceramics: From Computational Prediction to Thin‐Film Synthesis,” Advanced Materials, vol. 37, no. 32, pp. 1–11, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1002/adma.202501074. F. Messi et al., Empa, 2026 21

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.202501074 2025

  33. [34]

    Tuning the optoelectronic properties of wide bandgap perovskites: Data-driven insights from combinatorial synthesis and high-throughput experimentation,

    A. Wieczorek et al., “Tuning the optoelectronic properties of wide bandgap perovskites: Data-driven insights from combinatorial synthesis and high-throughput experimentation,” Advanced Functional Materials, p. in press

  34. [35]

    Combinatorial Reactive Sputtering with Auger Parameter Analysis Enables Synthesis of Wurtzite Zn 2 TaN 3,

    S. Zhuk et al., “Combinatorial Reactive Sputtering with Auger Parameter Analysis Enables Synthesis of Wurtzite Zn 2 TaN 3,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 35, no. 17, pp. 7069–7078, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c01341

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c01341 2023

  35. [36]

    Concepts for chemical state analysis at constant probing depth by lab‐ based XPS/HAXPES combining soft and hard X‐ray sources,

    S. Siol et al., “Concepts for chemical state analysis at constant probing depth by lab‐ based XPS/HAXPES combining soft and hard X‐ray sources,” Surface and Interface Analysis, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 802–810, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1002/sia.6790

    work page doi:10.1002/sia.6790 2020

  36. [37]

    Deposition of highly-crystalline AlScN thin films using synchronized HiPIMS -- from combinatorial screening to piezoelectric devices,

    J. Patidar, K. Thorwarth, T. Schmitz-Kempen, R. Kessels, and S. Siol, “Deposition of highly-crystalline AlScN thin films using synchronized HiPIMS -- from combinatorial screening to piezoelectric devices,” American Physical Society, vol. 095001, pp. 1–13, 2024, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.8.095001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevmaterials.8.095001 2024

  37. [38]

    Wurtzite AlScN / AlN Superlattice Ferroelectrics Enable Endurance Beyond 10 10 Cycles,

    R. Wang, F. Zhu, H. Qian, J. Zhou, and W. Sun, “Wurtzite AlScN / AlN Superlattice Ferroelectrics Enable Endurance Beyond 10 10 Cycles,” pp. 1–30

  38. [39]

    Mechanism of point-defect-driven evolution inferroelectricity of AlScN films,

    D. Shi, D. Zhou, Y. Tong, and X. Wang, “Mechanism of point-defect-driven evolution inferroelectricity of AlScN films,” no. December 2022, 2026, doi: 10.1063/5.0316749

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0316749 2022

  39. [40]

    Enhanced fatigue resistance of ferroelectric Al0.65Sc0.35N deposited by physical vapor deposition,

    Y. Li et al., “Enhanced fatigue resistance of ferroelectric Al0.65Sc0.35N deposited by physical vapor deposition,” Science China Information Sciences, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 1– 2, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11432-023-3960-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s11432-023-3960-6 2024

  40. [41]

    Leakage Mechanism and Cycling Behavior of Ferroelectric,

    L. Chen et al., “Leakage Mechanism and Cycling Behavior of Ferroelectric,” Materials, pp. 1–12, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17020397

    work page doi:10.3390/ma17020397 2024

  41. [42]

    Origins of optical absorption and emission lines in AlN,

    Q. Yan, A. Janotti, M. Scheffler, and C. G. Van De Walle, “Origins of optical absorption and emission lines in AlN,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 105, no. 11, 2014, doi: 10.1063/1.4895786

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4895786 2014

  42. [43]

    Origin of the anomalous piezoelectric response in wurtzite scxAl1- xN alloys,

    F. Tasnádi et al., “Origin of the anomalous piezoelectric response in wurtzite scxAl1- xN alloys,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 104, no. 13, pp. 1–4, Mar. 2010, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.137601

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.137601 2010

  43. [44]

    Low temperature deposition of functional thin films on insulating substrates enabled by selective ion acceleration using synchronized floating potential HiPIMS,

    J. Patidar, O. Pshyk, K. Thorwarth, L. Sommerhäuser, and S. Siol, “Low temperature deposition of functional thin films on insulating substrates enabled by selective ion acceleration using synchronized floating potential HiPIMS,” Nature Communications, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 4719, May 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59911-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-59911-y 2025

  44. [45]

    Accurate reporting of ion time-of- flight during HiPIMS with gated front-end mass spectrometry,

    N. Rodkey, J. Patidar, K. Thorwarth, and S. Siol, “Accurate reporting of ion time-of- flight during HiPIMS with gated front-end mass spectrometry,” Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A, vol. 44, no. 1, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.1116/6.0005106. F. Messi et al., Empa, 2026 22

    work page doi:10.1116/6.0005106 2026

  45. [46]

    Lundberg, S.M., Lee, S.I.: A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. pp. 4765–4774 (2017),

    S. M. Lundberg and S. . Lee, “Lundberg, S.M., Lee, S.I.: A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. pp. 4765–4774 (2017),” NIPS-2017 Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 4765–4774, 2017

    2017

  46. [47]

    Autonomous Sampling and SHAP Interpretation of Deposition-Rates in Bipolar HiPIMS,

    A. Wieczorek, N. Rodkey, J. Sommerhäuser, J. Hattrick-Simpers, and S. Siol, “Autonomous Sampling and SHAP Interpretation of Deposition-Rates in Bipolar HiPIMS,” zenodo, vol. preprint, p. 10.5281/zenodo.18197151, 2026, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.18197151. F. Messi et al., Empa, 2026 23 Supporting Information Boron Co -Alloying in AlScN Wurtzite Ferroelectrics: In...

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.18197151 2026