pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.12062 · v1 · pith:VKBT2EU3new · submitted 2026-06-10 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft · cond-mat.mtrl-sci· physics.flu-dyn

When and how particles are removed by drops

Abhinav Naga , Franziska Sabath , Doris Vollmer , Halim Kusumaatmaja This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 07:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.flu-dyn
keywords particle removalcapillary forcesliquid dropsself-cleaning surfaceslattice Boltzmannconfocal microscopydimensionless parameterfriction forces
0
0 comments X

The pith

A dimensionless capillary capture parameter predicts particle removal by drops across varied properties.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates the conditions under which a liquid drop colliding with a particle on a surface succeeds or fails at removing it. It identifies six distinct scenarios arising from the interplay of capillary and friction forces during the collision. The capillary force acts in opposing ways: its tangential component promotes removal while its normal component can prevent it. A single dimensionless parameter is introduced that collapses predictions for removal success over wide ranges of particle size, surface wettability, and related properties. This framework supplies design rules for surfaces that clean efficiently with minimal water or chemicals, addressing contamination issues in solar panels, windows, and electronics.

Core claim

When a drop collides with a particle on a surface, at least six different scenarios arise from the complex interplay between capillary and friction forces. The capillary force plays a dual role in particle removal: while its tangential component always drives removal, its normal component can also hinder it. By introducing a dimensionless capillary capture parameter, particle removal can be predicted across a wide range of particle and surface properties.

What carries the argument

The dimensionless capillary capture parameter, which balances the driving capillary forces against frictional resistance to determine removal outcome.

If this is right

  • Surfaces can be engineered for reliable particle removal by tuning properties that enter the capillary capture parameter.
  • Cleaning protocols can be optimized to use less water and fewer chemicals while still achieving removal.
  • Particle removal success becomes predictable without running new simulations for each combination of particle size and surface.
  • The same parameter distinguishes the six collision scenarios and explains why some drops clean while others do not.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The parameter could be tested on surfaces with controlled roughness or coatings to check whether it still collapses data when additional length scales appear.
  • Extending the model to moving drops or multiple particles in succession might reveal whether the capture parameter remains sufficient for realistic contamination patterns.
  • Applications to solar-panel maintenance would benefit from checking how the parameter changes when particles are embedded rather than loosely adhered.

Load-bearing premise

The six scenarios and the forces modeled in the simulations and experiments together capture every relevant physical effect that determines whether a drop removes a particle.

What would settle it

An experiment or simulation in which the capillary capture parameter predicts removal but particles remain attached, or predicts attachment but particles are removed, for parameters outside the tested range.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.12062 by Abhinav Naga, Doris Vollmer, Franziska Sabath, Halim Kusumaatmaja.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Schematic of the equilibrium shape of a drop as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Simulation snapshots of liquid-air interface moving across a particle. The contact [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a,b) Normalized capillary force on a particle as a water-air interface moved across the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Phase diagram showing different collision scenarios as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Interference fringes observed when imaging the reflection of the laser beam from below [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Particulate contaminants decrease the power output of solar panels, the transparency of windows, and are detrimental to microelectronics, where even a single particle can induce a short circuit. Despite significant research on particle adhesion and self-cleaning, it remains unclear when and how a drop can remove a particle from a surface, thus efficiently cleaning the surface. Here, by combining lattice Boltzmann simulations and confocal microscopy experiments, we show that at least six different scenarios arise from the complex interplay between capillary and friction forces when a drop collides with a particle. Notably, the capillary force plays a dual role in particle removal: while its tangential component always drives removal, its normal component can also hinder it. By introducing a dimensionless capillary capture parameter, we can predict particle removal across a wide range of particle and surface properties. These results provide quantitative design principles for easy-to-clean surfaces that minimize water and chemical usage.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper combines lattice Boltzmann simulations and confocal microscopy experiments to study particle removal by impacting drops. It identifies at least six distinct scenarios arising from the interplay of capillary and friction forces, notes that the capillary force has a dual role (tangential component drives removal while normal component can hinder it), and introduces a dimensionless capillary capture parameter claimed to predict removal across a wide range of particle and surface properties, yielding quantitative design principles for easy-to-clean surfaces.

Significance. If the central predictive claim holds, the work supplies practical, parameter-based guidelines for minimizing water and chemical use in cleaning applications such as solar panels and microelectronics. The dual simulation-experiment approach and identification of multiple scenarios are strengths that could advance the field beyond purely empirical or single-mechanism models.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and § on the capillary capture parameter: the claim that this single dimensionless parameter predicts removal 'across a wide range of particle and surface properties' is load-bearing for the central result, yet the manuscript does not appear to test or incorporate variations in electrostatic double-layer forces, van der Waals contributions, or pH-dependent surface chemistry; if these were held fixed in the LB runs and confocal experiments, the parameter's claimed generality requires explicit justification or additional terms.
minor comments (2)
  1. Clarify the exact definition and derivation of the capillary capture parameter (including which forces enter the normal and tangential components) so that readers can reproduce the threshold without ambiguity.
  2. Provide error bars, number of independent runs, and exclusion criteria for both the lattice Boltzmann trajectories and the confocal observations to allow assessment of statistical robustness.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and § on the capillary capture parameter: the claim that this single dimensionless parameter predicts removal 'across a wide range of particle and surface properties' is load-bearing for the central result, yet the manuscript does not appear to test or incorporate variations in electrostatic double-layer forces, van der Waals contributions, or pH-dependent surface chemistry; if these were held fixed in the LB runs and confocal experiments, the parameter's claimed generality requires explicit justification or additional terms.

    Authors: The capillary capture parameter is derived specifically from the balance of capillary and frictional forces that control the six removal scenarios identified in the work. Both the lattice Boltzmann simulations and confocal experiments systematically varied particle radius, density, surface wettability (contact angle), and friction coefficient while holding electrostatic double-layer, van der Waals, and pH-dependent contributions fixed at representative values for neutral aqueous systems. These DLVO-type interactions are typically screened or secondary under the dynamic conditions of drop impact. We will revise the abstract and the dedicated section on the parameter to state this scope explicitly, qualify the generality claim to the capillary-friction regime, and note that additional terms would be needed if DLVO forces dominate. This constitutes a clarification rather than an expansion of the model. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; parameter derived from independent LB simulations and confocal experiments

full rationale

The abstract describes combining lattice Boltzmann simulations and confocal microscopy to identify six scenarios from capillary-friction interplay, then introducing a dimensionless capillary capture parameter to predict removal. No quoted equations or text in the provided material show the parameter being defined in terms of the removal outcome itself, a fitted subset being relabeled as a prediction, or load-bearing self-citations/ansatzes. The derivation chain remains self-contained against the external simulation and experimental benchmarks rather than reducing to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are identifiable from the abstract alone; the capillary capture parameter is introduced as a derived dimensionless quantity.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5694 in / 1096 out tokens · 16376 ms · 2026-06-27T07:59:27.735634+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Adebiyi, J

    A. Adebiyi, J. F. Kok, B. J. Murray, C. L. Ryder, J.-B. W. Stuut, R. A. Kahn, P. Knippertz, P. Formenti, N. M. Mahowald, C. P´ erez Garc´ ıa-Pando, M. Klose, A. Ansmann, B. H. Samset, A. Ito, Y. Balkanski, C. Di Biagio, M. N. Romanias, Y. Huang, and J. Meng, A review of coarse mineral dust in the Earth system, Aeolian Res.60, 100849 (2023)

    2023

  2. [2]

    Brahney, M

    J. Brahney, M. Hallerud, E. Heim, M. Hahnenberger, and S. Sukumaran, Plastic rain in protected areas of the United States, Science368, 1257 (2020)

    2020

  3. [3]

    Soheili, S

    F. Soheili, S. Woodward, H. Abdul-Hamid, and H. R. Naji, The effect of dust deposition on the morphology and physiology of tree foliage, Water Air Soil Pollut.234, 339 (2023)

    2023

  4. [4]

    K. P. Beckett, P. H. Freer-Smith, and G. Taylor, Urban woodlands: their role in reducing the effects of particulate pollution, Environ. Pollut.99, 347 (1998). 21

    1998

  5. [5]

    K. Ilse, L. Micheli, B. W. Figgis, K. Lange, D. Daßler, H. Hanifi, F. Wolfertstetter, V. Nau- mann, C. Hagendorf, R. Gottschalg, and J. Bagdahn, Techno-Economic Assessment of Soiling Losses and Mitigation Strategies for Solar Power Generation, Joule3, 2303 (2019)

    2019

  6. [6]

    A. Naga, A. Kaltbeitzel, W. S. Y. Wong, L. Hauer, H.-J. Butt, and D. Vollmer, How a water drop removes a particle from a hydrophobic surface, Soft Matter17, 1746 (2021)

    2021

  7. [7]

    T. Yin, D. Shin, J. Frechette, C. E. Colosqui, and G. Drazer, Dynamic effects on the mobi- lization of a deposited nanoparticle by a moving liquid-liquid interface, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 238002 (2018)

    2018

  8. [8]

    Geyer, M

    F. Geyer, M. D’Acunzi, A. Sharifi-Aghili, A. Saal, N. Gao, A. Kaltbeitzel, T.-F. Sloot, R. Berger, H.-J. Butt, and D. Vollmer, When and how self-cleaning of superhydrophobic surfaces works, Sci. Adv.6, eaaw9727 (2020)

    2020

  9. [9]

    Perumanath, R

    S. Perumanath, R. Pillai, and M. K. Borg, Contaminant removal from nature’s self-cleaning surfaces, Nano Lett.23, 4234 (2023)

    2023

  10. [10]

    K. M. Wisdom, J. A. Watson, X. Qu, F. Liu, G. S. Watson, and C.-H. Chen, Self-cleaning of superhydrophobic surfaces by self-propelled jumping condensate, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.110, 7992 (2013), publisher: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

    2013

  11. [11]

    Heckenthaler, S

    T. Heckenthaler, S. Sadhujan, Y. Morgenstern, P. Natarajan, M. Bashouti, and Y. Kaufman, Self-cleaning mechanism: Why nanotexture and hydrophobicity matter, Langmuir35, 15526 (2019)

    2019

  12. [12]

    Leenaars and S

    A. Leenaars and S. O’Brien, Particle removal from silicon substrates using surface tension forces, Philips J. Res. , 183 (1989)

    1989

  13. [13]

    Neinhuis and W

    C. Neinhuis and W. Barthlott, Characterization and distribution of water-repellent, self- cleaning plant surfaces, Ann. Bot.79, 667 (1997)

    1997

  14. [14]

    Blossey, Self-cleaning surfaces — virtual realities, Nat

    R. Blossey, Self-cleaning surfaces — virtual realities, Nat. Mater.2, 301 (2003)

    2003

  15. [15]

    Hassan, B

    G. Hassan, B. S. Yilbas, A. Al-Sharafi, and H. Al-Qahtani, Self-cleaning of a hydrophobic surface by a rolling water droplet, Sci. Rep.9, 5744 (2019)

    2019

  16. [16]

    F¨ urstner, W

    R. F¨ urstner, W. Barthlott, C. Neinhuis, and P. Walzel, Wetting and self-cleaning properties of artificial superhydrophobic surfaces, Langmuir21, 956 (2005)

    2005

  17. [17]

    Lafuma and D

    A. Lafuma and D. Qu´ er´ e, Superhydrophobic states, Nat. Mater.2, 457 (2003)

    2003

  18. [18]

    Wang, C.-S

    J.-S. Wang, C.-S. Li, R.-R. Cai, and L.-Z. Zhang, Self-cleaning properties of superhydrophobic surface: Effect of particle wettability, Powder Technol.452, 120536 (2025). 22

    2025

  19. [19]

    Bhushan, Y

    B. Bhushan, Y. C. Jung, and K. Koch, Self-cleaning efficiency of artificial superhydrophobic surfaces, Langmuir25, 3240 (2009)

    2009

  20. [20]

    A. Naga, X. Zhang, J. Yang, and H. Kusumaatmaja, Modeling droplet-particle interactions on solid surfaces by coupling the lattice Boltzmann and discrete element methods (2025), 10.48550/arXiv.2505.10171

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.10171 2025

  21. [21]

    L. Fei, F. Qin, G. Wang, J. Huang, B. Wen, J. Zhao, K. H. Luo, D. Derome, and J. Carmeliet, Coupled lattice Boltzmann method–discrete element method model for gas–liquid–solid inter- action problems, J. Fluid Mech.975, A20 (2023)

    2023

  22. [22]

    Jiang, H

    F. Jiang, H. Liu, X. Chen, and T. Tsuji, A coupled LBM-DEM method for simulating the multiphase fluid-solid interaction problem, J. Comput. Phys.454, 110963 (2022)

    2022

  23. [23]

    N. Sinn, M. Alishahi, and S. Hardt, Detachment of particles and particle clusters from liq- uid/liquid interfaces, J. Colloid Interf. Sci.458, 62 (2015)

    2015

  24. [24]

    W. S. Y. Wong, L. Hauer, A. Naga, A. Kaltbeitzel, P. Baumli, R. Berger, M. D‘Acunzi, D. Vollmer, and H.-J. Butt, Adaptive Wetting of Polydimethylsiloxane, Langmuir36, 7236 (2020)

    2020

  25. [25]

    H.-J. Butt, J. Liu, K. Koynov, B. Straub, C. Hinduja, I. Roismann, R. Berger, X. Li, D. Vollmer, W. Steffen, and M. Kappl, Contact angle hysteresis, Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci.59, 101574 (2022)

    2022

  26. [26]

    A. Naga, D. Vollmer, and H.-J. Butt, Capillary torque on a particle rotating at an interface, Langmuir37, 7457 (2021)

    2021

  27. [27]

    J. S. Marshall, Capillary torque on a rolling particle in the presence of a liquid film at small capillary numbers, Chem. Eng. Sci.108, 87 (2014)

    2014

  28. [28]

    J. Gao, W. D. Luedtke, D. Gourdon, M. Ruths, J. N. Israelachvili, and U. Landman, Frictional forces and Amontons’ law: from the molecular to the macroscopic scale, J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 3410 (2004)

    2004

  29. [29]

    Butt and M

    H.-J. Butt and M. Kappl,Surface and interfacial forces, 2nd ed. (Wiley-VCH, 2018)

    2018

  30. [30]

    A. D. Scheludko and D. Nikolov, Measurement of surface tension by pulling a sphere from a liquid, Colloid Polym. Sci.253, 396 (1975)

    1975

  31. [31]

    J. H. Snoeijer and B. Andreotti, Moving contact lines: Scales, regimes, and dynamical tran- sitions, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.45, 269 (2013). 23

    2013

  32. [32]

    Hourlier-Fargette, A

    A. Hourlier-Fargette, A. Antkowiak, A. Chateauminois, and S. Neukirch, Role of uncrosslinked chains in droplets dynamics on silicone elastomers, Soft Matter13, 3484 (2017)

    2017

  33. [33]

    S. Ni, L. Isa, and H. Wolf, Capillary assembly as a tool for the heterogeneous integration of micro- and nanoscale objects, Soft Matter14, 2978 (2018)

    2018

  34. [34]

    I. B. Liu, N. Sharifi-Mood, and K. J. Stebe, Capillary Assembly of Colloids: Interactions on Planar and Curved Interfaces, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.9, 283 (2018)

    2018

  35. [35]

    D. W. Pilat, P. Papadopoulos, D. Sch¨ affel, D. Vollmer, R. Berger, and H.-J. Butt, Dynamic Measurement of the Force Required to Move a Liquid Drop on a Solid Surface, Langmuir28, 16812 (2012)

    2012

  36. [36]

    N. Gao, F. Geyer, D. W. Pilat, S. Wooh, D. Vollmer, H.-J. Butt, and R. Berger, How drops start sliding over solid surfaces, Nat. Phys.14, 191 (2018)

    2018

  37. [37]

    Daniel, J

    D. Daniel, J. V. I. Timonen, R. Li, S. J. Velling, and J. Aizenberg, Oleoplaning droplets on lubricated surfaces, Nat. Phys.13, 1020 (2017). 24

    2017