pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.12264 · v1 · pith:DMIL5NSPnew · submitted 2026-06-10 · ⚛️ nucl-th · nucl-ex

The Confined beta-Soft rotor model in rare-earth nuclei

Jim A. Papadopoulos , T.J. Mertzimekis , P. Koseoglou , P. Vasileiou , Dennis Bonatsos This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 07:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th nucl-ex
keywords Confined beta-Soft rotor modelrare-earth nucleieven-even nucleiB(E2) transitionsbeta bandsnuclear deformationX(5) symmetry
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Confined beta-Soft rotor model reproduces ground-state band energies, B(E2) transition rates, and beta-band excitations in even-even rare-earth nuclei.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The Confined beta-Soft (CBS) rotor model is applied to even-even nuclei in the rare-earth region where the energy ratio R_{4/2} falls between 2.904 and 3.333, a range that interpolates between the X(5) critical point and the rigid rotor limit. The model supplies calculations of ground-state band energies, associated B(E2) electric quadrupole transition strengths, and beta-band excitations. These quantities are compared directly with experimental measurements, and the same framework supplies predictions for observables that remain unmeasured.

Core claim

The CBS framework bridges the X(5) critical point symmetry and the rigid rotor limit, allowing systematic calculations of nuclear observables in the rare-earth region that match available data.

What carries the argument

The Confined beta-Soft (CBS) rotor model, which confines the beta deformation variable to interpolate between X(5) symmetry and the rigid rotor.

If this is right

  • Ground-state band energies follow directly from parameters fixed by the observed R_{4/2} ratio.
  • B(E2) transition rates within the ground-state band are obtained consistently from the same wave functions.
  • Beta-band excitation energies are generated by the identical confined-beta Hamiltonian.
  • Unmeasured transition rates and band-head energies in the rare-earth region are supplied as concrete predictions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Collective degrees of freedom alone appear sufficient to organize the data in this transitional window.
  • The same parameter choice may be tested in other mass regions that exhibit comparable R_{4/2} values.
  • Persistent discrepancies in individual nuclei could point to the limits of the collective description.

Load-bearing premise

The CBS model parameters chosen or fitted to the stated R_{4/2} interval remain valid across the rare-earth region without requiring additional microscopic corrections.

What would settle it

Systematic experimental deviations in B(E2) rates or beta-band energies from the CBS predictions across multiple nuclei in the R_{4/2} range would falsify the model's uniform applicability.

read the original abstract

Contemporary theoretical descriptions of nuclear structure rely mainly on microscopic, single-particle frameworks often in competition with collective degrees of freedom, especially when deformation plays a dominant role. Such phenomena are prominent in the rare-earth region, where rotational band structures and enhanced electric quadrupole transitions are systematically examined. The Confined beta-Soft (CBS) rotor model, introduced by N. Pietralla and O.M. Gorbachenko, bridges the gap between the X(5) critical point and the rigid-rotor limit in the region where the R_4/2 = E(4+)/E(2+) ratio lies between 2.904 and 3.333. In the present work, the CBS framework is employed to calculate ground-state band energies, associated B(E2) transition rates, and beta-band excitations of even-even nuclei in the rare-earth region. The theoretical results are systematically compared with available experimental data, and predictions are provided for nuclear observables that have not yet been measured, offering guidance for future experimental investigations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies the Confined beta-Soft (CBS) rotor model to even-even rare-earth nuclei with R_{4/2} ratios in the interval 2.904–3.333. It computes ground-state band energies, B(E2) transition rates, and beta-band excitations, performs systematic comparisons to experimental data, and supplies predictions for unmeasured observables.

Significance. The CBS framework interpolates between the X(5) critical-point symmetry and the rigid-rotor limit. A successful, parameter-consistent application across the rare-earth region would supply a compact collective description useful for interpreting existing data and prioritizing future measurements. The explicit provision of predictions for unmeasured quantities is a constructive feature.

major comments (1)
  1. [Introduction and §3 (Results)] The central comparisons and predictions presuppose that the CBS parameters (fixed by the stated R_{4/2} window) remain valid without region-specific or microscopic adjustments. The manuscript does not contain an explicit statement or table demonstrating that a single, universal parameter set reproduces the reported agreement across the nuclei considered; this is load-bearing for the claimed generality of the results.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions should explicitly state the nuclei included and the experimental data sources used for each panel.
  2. [§2 (Model)] Notation for the CBS parameters (e.g., the confinement strength) should be defined once in the text and used consistently thereafter.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation and the recommendation of minor revision. The single major comment is addressed point-by-point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Introduction and §3 (Results)] The central comparisons and predictions presuppose that the CBS parameters (fixed by the stated R_{4/2} window) remain valid without region-specific or microscopic adjustments. The manuscript does not contain an explicit statement or table demonstrating that a single, universal parameter set reproduces the reported agreement across the nuclei considered; this is load-bearing for the claimed generality of the results.

    Authors: The CBS model is defined by a single functional form whose sole adjustable parameter is fixed directly by the experimental R_{4/2} value of each nucleus; no additional region-specific or microscopic parameters are introduced. This uniform application is the basis for the systematic comparisons presented. While the manuscript states that parameters are fixed by the R_{4/2} window, we acknowledge that an explicit table listing the R_{4/2} values and the resulting CBS parameters for every nucleus would make the universality clearer. We will add such a table in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper applies the pre-existing CBS rotor model (introduced by Pietralla and Gorbachenko) to even-even rare-earth nuclei selected by the model's defined R_{4/2} window, computes ground-state band energies, B(E2) rates and beta-band excitations, then compares results directly to independent experimental data while offering predictions for unmeasured cases. No equations or steps in the provided text reduce any claimed prediction or result to a fitted input or self-citation by construction; the central comparisons rest on external benchmarks rather than tautological re-derivation of the input range or parameters.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on the prior CBS model and its domain assumptions; no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • CBS model parameters
    Parameters that place the model between X(5) and rigid rotor are required and are expected to be set by the R_{4/2} interval or data fits.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption CBS model correctly interpolates between X(5) critical point and rigid rotor for R_{4/2} in 2.904–3.333
    Invoked when the framework is applied to the rare-earth region.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5725 in / 1205 out tokens · 22878 ms · 2026-06-27T07:44:59.922176+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Hamamoto, B

    I. Hamamoto, B. Mottelson, Shape deformations in atomic nuclei, Scholarpedia 7 (2012) 10693. doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.10693

    work page doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.10693 2012

  2. [2]

    Litvinova, Recent advancements in the strongly coupled many-body problem, arXiv (2025)

    E. Litvinova, Recent advancements in the strongly coupled many-body problem, arXiv (2025). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2512.23644

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.23644 2025

  3. [3]

    Hergert, A guided tour ofab initionuclear many-body theory, fphy 8 (2020) 379

    H. Hergert, A guided tour ofab initionuclear many-body theory, fphy 8 (2020) 379. doi:10. 3389/fphy.2020.00379

    arXiv 2020

  4. [4]

    Ekström, C

    A. Ekström, C. Forssén, T. Papenbrock, et al., What isab initioin nuclear theory?, fphy 11 (2023) 1129094. doi:10.3389/fphy.2023.1129094

    work page doi:10.3389/fphy.2023.1129094 2023

  5. [5]

    Iachello, Dynamic symmetries at the critical point, Phys

    F. Iachello, Dynamic symmetries at the critical point, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000) 3580–3583. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3580

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.3580 2000

  6. [6]

    Iachello, Analytic description of critical point nuclei in a spherical-axially deformed shape phase transition, Phys

    F. Iachello, Analytic description of critical point nuclei in a spherical-axially deformed shape phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 052502. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.052502

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.87.052502 2001

  7. [7]

    Cejnar, J

    P. Cejnar, J. Jolie, R. F. Casten, Quantum phase transitions in the shapes of atomic nuclei, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 (2010) 2155–2212. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.82.2155

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.2155 2010

  8. [8]

    βexcitation

    N. Pietralla, O. M. Gorbachenko, Evolution of the “βexcitation” in axially symmetric transitional nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 70 (2004, 011304). doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.70.011304

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.70.011304 2004

  9. [9]

    Reese, CBS model program,https://sourceforge.net/projects/cbsmodel/, 2011

    M. Reese, CBS model program,https://sourceforge.net/projects/cbsmodel/, 2011

    2011

  10. [10]

    P. E. Garrett, Characterization of theβvibration and0 + 2 states in deformed nuclei, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 27 (2001) R1–R29. URL:https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0954-3899/27/1/201. doi:10.1088/0954-3899/27/1/201

    work page doi:10.1088/0954-3899/27/1/201 2001

  11. [11]

    Sharpey-Schafer, R

    J. Sharpey-Schafer, R. Bark, S. Bvumbi, E. Lawrie, J. Lawrie, T. Madiba, S. Majola, A. Minkova, S. Mullins, P. Papka, D. Roux, J. Timár, A double vacuum, configuration dependent pairing and lack ofβ-vibrations in transitional nuclei: Band structure of n = 88 to n = 91 nuclei, Nu- clear Physics A 834 (2010) 45c–49c. URL:https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2010.01.014 2010

  12. [12]

    Sharpey-Schafer, R

    J. Sharpey-Schafer, R. Bark, S. Bvumbi, T. Dinoko, S. Majola, “stiff” deformed nuclei, configu- ration dependent pairing and theβandγdegrees of freedom, The European Physical Journal A 55 (2019) 15

    2019

  13. [13]

    Aprahamian, K

    A. Aprahamian, K. Lee, S. R. Lesher and R. Bijker, The nature of 0+ excitations in deformed nuclei, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 143 (2025, 104173). doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2025. 104173

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2025 2025

  14. [14]

    Reconstructing the impact parameter of proton-nucleus and nucleus-nucleus collisions

    K. Dusling, N. Pietralla, Description of ground-state band energies in well-deformed even-even nu- clei with the confinedβ-soft rotor model, Phys. Rev. C 72 (2005) 011303. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC. 72.011303

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc 2005

  15. [15]

    Bohr, The Coupling of Nuclear Surface Oscillations to the Motion of Individual Nucleons, Det Kgl

    A. Bohr, The Coupling of Nuclear Surface Oscillations to the Motion of Individual Nucleons, Det Kgl. Danske Videnskabernes Selskab. Matematisk-fysiske meddelelser, Komm. Munksgaard, 1952. URL:https://books.google.gr/books?id=A8QTtQEACAAJ

    1952

  16. [16]

    A. Bohr, B. R. Mottelson, Nuclear Structure, World Scientific, New York, 1997

    1997

  17. [17]

    A. Bohr, B. Mottelson, Nuclear Structure, Volume II: Nuclear Deformations, W.A. Benjamin, 1975

    1975

  18. [18]

    Solutions of the Bohr hamiltonian, a compendium

    L. Fortunato, Solutions of the Bohr Hamiltonian, a compendium, Eur. Phys. J. A 26S1 (2005) 1–30. doi:10.1140/epjad/i2005-07-115-8.arXiv:nucl-th/0411087

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjad/i2005-07-115-8.arxiv:nucl-th/0411087 2005

  19. [19]

    Bonatsos, P

    D. Bonatsos, P. E. Georgoudis, D. Lenis, N. Minkov, C. Quesne, Bohr hamiltonian with a deformation-dependent mass term for the davidson potential, Phys. Rev. C 83 (2011). doi:10.1103/physrevc.83.044321

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.83.044321 2011

  20. [20]

    Buganu, L

    P. Buganu, L. Fortunato, Recent approaches to quadrupole collectivity: models, solutions and applications based on the bohr hamiltonian, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 43 (2016) 093003. URL:https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/43/9/093003. doi:10. 1088/0954-3899/43/9/093003

    work page doi:10.1088/0954-3899/43/9/093003 2016

  21. [21]

    J. A. Papadopoulos, T. J. Mertzimekis, P. Koseoglou, D. Bonatsos, P. Vasileiou, M. Efstathiou, Investigation of the Yb and W Isotopic Chains using the Confinedβ-Soft Rotor Model, HNPS Adv. Nucl. Phys. 32 (2026) 107–112. doi:10.12681/hnpsanp.8764. 17

    work page doi:10.12681/hnpsanp.8764 2026

  22. [22]

    Kocheva, K

    D. Kocheva, K. A. Gladnishki, A. Blazhev, et al., Lifetimes and electromagnetic transition strengths in Er, Eur. Phys. J. A 62 (2026) 18. doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-025-01778-0

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-025-01778-0 2026

  23. [23]

    NUDAT, National Nuclear Data Center, online.https://www.nndc.bnl.gov/nudat3/

  24. [24]

    S. Basu, A. Sonzogni, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=150, Nucl. Data Sheets 114 (2013) 435–660. doi:10.1016/j.nds.2013.04.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nds.2013.04.001 2013

  25. [25]

    Martin, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=152, Nucl

    M. Martin, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=152, Nucl. Data Sheets 114 (2013) p. 1497–1847. doi:10. 1016/j.nds.2013.11.001

    2013

  26. [26]

    Nica, Nuclear Data Sheets for A=154, Nuclear Data Sheets 200 (2025) 2–524

    N. Nica, Nuclear Data Sheets for A=154, Nuclear Data Sheets 200 (2025) 2–524. URL:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090375225000134. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2025.02.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nds.2025.02.002 2025

  27. [27]

    Iimura, J

    H. Iimura, J. Katakura, S. Ohya, Nuclear data sheets for a=126, Nucl. Data Sheets 180 (2022) 1–413. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2022.02.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nds.2022.02.001 2022

  28. [28]

    Elekes, J

    Z. Elekes, J. Timar, Nuclear data sheets for a = 128, Nuclear Data Sheets 129 (2015) 191–436. URL:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090375215000472. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2015.09.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nds.2015.09.002 2015

  29. [29]

    Reich, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=156, Nucl

    C. Reich, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=156, Nucl. Data Sheets 113 (2012) 2537–2840. doi:10.1016/ j.nds.2012.10.003

    2012

  30. [33]

    Singh, J

    B. Singh, J. Chen, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=164, Nucl. Data Sheets 147 (2018). doi:10.1016/ j.nds.2018.01.001

    2018

  31. [34]

    C. M. Baglin, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=166, Nucl. Data Sheets 109 (2008) 1103–1382. doi:10. 1016/j.nds.2008.04.001

    2008

  32. [35]

    C. M. Baglin, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=168, Nucl. Data Sheets 111 (2010) 1807 – 2080. doi:10.1016/j.nds.2010.07.001. 18

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nds.2010.07.001 2010

  33. [36]

    Baglin, E

    C. Baglin, E. McCutchan, S. Basunia, E. Browne, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=170, Nucl. Data Sheets 153 (2018) 1–494. doi:10.1016/j.nds.2018.11.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nds.2018.11.001 2018

  34. [38]

    Basunia, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=176, Nucl

    M. Basunia, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=176, Nucl. Data Sheets 107 (2006) p. 791–1026. doi:10. 1016/j.nds.2006.03.001

    2006

  35. [40]

    E. A. McCutchan, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=180, Nucl. Data Sheets 126 (2015) 151 – 372. doi:10.1016/j.nds.2015.05.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nds.2015.05.002 2015

  36. [41]

    Achterberg, O

    E. Achterberg, O. Capurro, G. Marti, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=178, Nucl. Data Sheets 110 (2009) 1473–1688. doi:10.1016/j.nds.2009.05.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nds.2009.05.002 2009

  37. [42]

    Lim, Aleksandra V

    B. Singh, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=182, Nucl. Data Sheets 130 (2015) 21–126. doi:10.1016/j. nds.2015.11.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2015

  38. [43]

    C. M. Baglin, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=184, Nucl. Data Sheets 111 (2010) 275–523. doi:10. 1016/j.nds.2010.01.001

    2010

  39. [44]

    Batchelder, A

    J. Batchelder, A. Hurst, M. Basunia, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=186, Nucl. Data Sheets 183 (2022) 1–346. doi:10.1016/j.nds.2022.06.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nds.2022.06.001 2022

  40. [45]

    Kondev, S

    F. Kondev, S. Juutinen, D. Hartley, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=188, Nucl. Data Sheets 150 (2018) 1–364. doi:10.1016/j.nds.2018.05.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nds.2018.05.001 2018

  41. [46]

    Singh, J

    B. Singh, J. Chen, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=190, Nucl. Data Sheets 169 (2020) 1–390. doi:10. 1016/j.nds.2020.10.001

    2020

  42. [47]

    Pritychenko, M

    B. Pritychenko, M. Birch, B. Singh, M. Horoi, Tables of E2 transition probabilities from the first 2+ states in even–even nuclei, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 107 (2016) 1–139. doi:10.1016/j.adt. 2015.10.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.adt 2016

  43. [48]

    C. W. Reich, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=154, Nucl. Data Sheets 110 (2009) 2257–2532. doi:10. 1016/j.nds.2009.09.001

    2009

  44. [49]

    R. L. Canavan, M. Rudigier, P. H. Regan, M. Lebois, J. N. Wilson, N. Jovancevic, P.-A. Söderström, S. M. Collins, D. Thisse, J. Benito, S. Bottoni, M. Brunet, N. Cieplicka-Oryńczak, 19 S. Courtin, D. T. Doherty, L. M. Fraile, K. Hadyńska-Klęk, G. Häfner, M. Heine, L. W. Iskra, V. Karayonchev, A. Kennington, P. Koseoglou, G. Lotay, G. Lorusso, M. Nakhostin...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.101.024313 2020

  45. [50]

    Petkov, A

    P. Petkov, A. Dewald, O. Möller, I. Deloncle, R. Chapman, S. Pascu, D. Bucurescu, D. Tonev, M. Reese, C. Fransen, S. Araddad, G. Asova, J. Copnell, N. Goutev, M. Hackstein, J. Jolie, J. Lisle, J. Mo, T. Pissulla, W. Rother, A. Smith, C. Tenereiro, D. Thompson, K. Zell, On the quadrupole collectivity in the yrast band of168Yb, Nucl. Phys. A 957 (2017) 240–...

    2017

  46. [51]

    Karayonchev, J.-M

    V. Karayonchev, J.-M. Régis, J. Jolie, A. Blazhev, R. Altenkirch, S. Ansari, M. Dannhoff, F. Diel, A. Esmaylzadeh, C. Fransen, R.-B. Gerst, K. Moschner, C. Müller-Gatermann, N. Saed-Samii, S. Stegemann, N. Warr, K. O. Zell, Evolution of collectivity in then= 100isotones near170Yb, Phys. Rev. C 95 (2017) 034316. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.95.034316

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.95.034316 2017

  47. [52]

    Rudigier, K

    M. Rudigier, K. Nomura, M. Dannhoff, R.-B. Gerst, J. Jolie, N. Saed-Samii, S. Stegemann, J.- M. Régis, L. M. Robledo, R. Rodríguez-Guzmán, A. Blazhev, C. Fransen, N. Warr, K. O. Zell, Evolution of E2 transition strength in deformed hafnium isotopes from new measurements on 172Hf, 174Hf, and 176Hf, Phys. Rev. C 91 (2015) 044301. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.91.044301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.91.044301 2015

  48. [53]

    Wiederhold, V

    J. Wiederhold, V. Werner, R. Kern, N. Pietralla, D. Bucurescu, R. Carroll, N. Cooper, T. Daniel, D. Filipescu, N. Florea, R.-B. Gerst, D. Ghita, L. Gurgi, J. Jolie, R. S. Ilieva, R. Lica, N. Marginean, R. Marginean, C. Mihai, I. O. Mitu, F. Naqvi, C. Nita, M. Rudigier, S. Stege- mann, S. Pascu, P. H. Regan, Evolution of E2 strength in the rare-earth isoto...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.99.024316 2019

  49. [54]

    Harter, L

    A. Harter, L. Knafla, G. Frießner, G. Häfner, J. Jolie, A. Blazhev, A. Dewald, F. Dunkel, A. Esmaylzadeh, C. Fransen, V. Karayonchev, K. Lawless, M. Ley, J.-M. Régis, K. O. Zell, Lifetime measurements in the tungsten isotopes176,178,180W, Phys. Rev. C 106 (2022) 024326. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.106.024326

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.106.024326 2022

  50. [55]

    Harter, A

    A. Harter, A. Esmaylzadeh, L. Knafla, C. Fransen, F. v. Spee, J. Jolie, M. Ley, V. Karayonchev, J. Fischer, A. Pfeil, Lifetime measurements in low yrast states and spectroscopic peculiarities in 182Os, Phys. Rev. C 108 (2023) 024305. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.108.024305. 20

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.108.024305 2023

  51. [56]

    Costin, M

    A. Costin, M. Reese, H. Ai, R. F. Casten, K. Dusling, C. R. Fitzpatrick, G. Gürdal, A. Heinz, E. A. McCutchan, D. A. Meyer, O. Möller, P. Petkov, N. Pietralla, J. Qian, G. Rainovski, V. Werner, Centrifugal stretching along the ground state band of168Hf, Phys. Rev. C 79 (2009) 024307. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.79.024307

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.79.024307 2009

  52. [57]

    Stephens, R

    F. Stephens, R. Simon, Coriolis effects in the yrast states, Nucl. Phys. A 183 (1972) 257–284. doi:10.1016/0375-9474(72)90658-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9474(72)90658-6 1972

  53. [58]

    R. Wyss, M. A. Riley, Fifty years of backbending, Nucl. Phys. News 32 (2022) 16–20. doi:10. 1080/10619127.2022.2063000.arXiv:10.1080/10619127.2022.2063000

    work page doi:10.1080/10619127.2022.2063000 2022

  54. [59]

    P. Ring, P. Schuck, The Nuclear Many-Body Problems, volume 103, Springer, 1980. doi:10.1063/ 1.2915762

    1980

  55. [60]

    F. S. Stephens, R. S. Simon, Properties of rotational bands in heavy nuclei, Nucl. Phys. A 183 (1972) 257–270. doi:10.1016/0375-9474(72)90619-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9474(72)90619-4 1972

  56. [61]

    F. S. Stephens, Phenomena associated with the rotational alignment of nucleons, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47 (1975) 43–65. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.47.43

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.47.43 1975

  57. [62]

    Bengtsson, S

    R. Bengtsson, S. Frauendorf, Rotational bands and particle alignment, Nucl. Phys. A 327 (1979) 139–160. doi:10.1016/0375-9474(79)90509-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9474(79)90509-8 1979

  58. [63]

    Koseoglou, V

    P. Koseoglou, V. Werner, N. Pietralla, D. Bonatsos, N=90 QSPT: Cerium, neodymium and samarium isotopic chains in the IBM symmetry triangle, HNPS Adv. Nucl. Phys. 26 (2019) 37–43. doi:10.12681/hnps.1793

    work page doi:10.12681/hnps.1793 2019

  59. [64]

    Koseoglou, V

    P. Koseoglou, V. Werner, N. Pietralla, S. Ilieva, T. Nikšić, D. Vretenar, P. Alexa, M. Thürauf, C. Bernards, A. Blanc, A. M. Bruce, R. B. Cakirli, N. Cooper, L. M. Fraile, G. de France, M. Jentschel, J. Jolie, U. Köster, W. Korten, T. Kröll, S. Lalkovski, H. Mach, N. Mărginean, P. Mutti, Z. Patel, V. Paziy, Z. Podolyák, P. H. Regan, J.-M. Régis, O. J. Rob...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.101.014303 2020

  60. [65]

    Koseoglou, V

    P. Koseoglou, V. Werner, N. Pietralla, N = 90 shape phase transition: increasing axial asymmetry towards 148Ce, Bulg. J. Phys. 49 (2022) p. 89–96

    2022

  61. [66]

    Koseoglou, et al., 2026

    P. Koseoglou, et al., 2026. (in preparation). 21

    2026

  62. [67]

    R. F. Casten, Empirical proton-neutron interaction and its relation to nuclear collectivity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54 (1985) 1991–1994

    1985

  63. [68]

    D. H. Feng, C.-L. Wu, M. W. Guidry, Z.-P. Li, Dynamical Pauli effects and the saturation of nuclear collectivity, Phys. Lett. B 205 (1988) 156–162. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(88)91639-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(88)91639-5 1988

  64. [69]

    Koseoglou, T

    P. Koseoglou, T. J. Mertzimekis, M. Efstathiou, P. Vasileiou, H. Mayr, C. M. Nickel, N. Pietralla, V. Werner, A. Blazhev, A. Esmaylzadeh, J. Fischer, C. Fransen, J. Jolie, M. Ley, A. Pfeil, F. von Spee, K. Gladnishki, D. Kocheva, G. Rainovski, N. Florea, A. Radu, D. Tofan, D. Bonatsos, K. E. Karakatsanis, Gamma-spectrometry on the well-deformed 178Yb: exc...

    work page doi:10.12681/hnpsanp.9053 2026

  65. [70]

    Zyriliou, et al., Nuclear Structure Investigations in Yb isotopes, HNPS Adv

    A. Zyriliou, et al., Nuclear Structure Investigations in Yb isotopes, HNPS Adv. Nucl. Phys. 28 (2022) 104–108. doi:10.12681/hnps.3609

    work page doi:10.12681/hnps.3609 2022

  66. [71]

    Gupta, V

    J. Gupta, V. Katoch, Review of nuclear structure N=86–118 of W isotopes, Nucl. Phys. A 1057 (2025, 123032). doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2025.123032

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2025.123032 2025

  67. [72]

    M. A. Caprio, Structure of collective modes in transitional and deformed nuclei, arXiv: Nuclear Experiment (2005). URL:https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:119368092

    2005

  68. [73]

    J. B. Gupta, J. H. Hamilton, Outstanding problems in the band structures of152Sm, Phys. Rev. C 96 (2017) 034321. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.96.034321

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.96.034321 2017

  69. [74]

    doi:10.1142/S0218301306005538

    Balabanski et al., Evidence for x(5) critical point symmetry in 128ce, International Journal of Modern Physics E 15 (2012). doi:10.1142/S0218301306005538

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218301306005538 2012

  70. [75]

    Tonev, A

    D. Tonev, A. Dewald, T. Klug, P. Petkov, J. Jolie, A. Fitzler, O. Möller, S. Heinze, P. von Brentano, R. F. Casten, Transition probabilities in154Gd: Evidence for X(5) critical point sym- metry, Phys. Rev. C 69 (2004) 034334. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.69.034334

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.69.034334 2004

  71. [76]

    Mccutchan, N

    E. Mccutchan, N. Zamfir, M. Caprio, R. Casten, H. Amro, C. Beausang, D. Brenner, A. Hecht, C. Hutter, S. Langdown, D. Meyer, P. Regan, J. Ressler, A. Yamamoto, Low spin states in162Y b and the X(5) critical point symmetry, Phys. Rev. C 69 (2004). doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.69.024308

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.69.024308 2004

  72. [77]

    Singh, J

    B. Singh, J. Chen, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=164, Nucl. Data Sheets 147 (2018) 1–381. doi:10. 1016/j.nds.2018.01.001

    2018

  73. [78]

    Singh, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=172, Nucl

    B. Singh, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=172, Nucl. Data Sheets 75 (1995) 199–376. doi:10.1006/ ndsh.1995.1025. 22

    arXiv 1995

  74. [79]

    Browne, H

    E. Browne, H. Junde, Nuclear Data Sheets forA=174, Nucl. Data Sheets 87 (1999) 15 – 176. doi:10.1006/ndsh.1999.0015. 23 Figures Fig. 2: Evolution of the CBS parameterrβ along the even–even isotopic chains of Ce-Os elements as a function of neutron number N. The bold gray point at178Yb(N= 108) represents the valuer β = 0.509, obtained from the CBS calculat...

    work page doi:10.1006/ndsh.1999.0015 1999