pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.12584 · v1 · pith:OEUQBHZGnew · submitted 2026-06-10 · ✦ hep-th · math-ph· math.MP· math.QA

The μ-extension of iterated integrals and nested sums

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 08:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th math-phmath.MPmath.QA
keywords μ-extensioniterated integralsnested sumspolylogarithmsHopf algebrashuffle productFeynman integralsMellin transform
0
0 comments X

The pith

The μ-extension of iterated integrals and nested sums stays within the same function spaces polynomially in μ, except for square-root alphabets.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs μ-extensions for iterated integrals that generalize polylogarithms and arise in analytic integration of single-scale Feynman integrals, along with the associated nested sums obtained via Mellin transform. These cover alphabets from linear denominators, cyclotomic letters, quadratic forms, and square-root valued letters, all solving first-order factorizing differential equations. Except for the square-root cases, the μ-extensions map back into the original function spaces as polynomials in μ. In the remaining cases the extensions preserve the Hopf algebra structure from the (quasi)shuffle product by adjoining μ to the ground field, and closed forms or algorithms are supplied for the more involved alphabets.

Core claim

We construct the μ-extensions of these iterated integrals and the associated nested sums. Except for the case of square-root valued alphabets, the μ-extension maps into the same function space polynomially in μ. This is also the case for the associated nested sums. For square-root valued alphabets or sums containing central binomials, the μ-extension leads to higher transcendental functions. In all other cases the μ-extension preserves the Hopf algebra structure implied by the (quasi)shuffle product, by supplementing μ to the ground field.

What carries the argument

The μ-extension operation on iterated integrals over the listed alphabets, which modifies the integrands or sums by a parameter μ while tracking closure under the differential equations and (quasi)shuffle products.

If this is right

  • Analytic integration of single-scale Feynman integrals can incorporate the μ-parameter without introducing new function classes except for square-root alphabets.
  • The associated nested sums admit μ-extensions that remain inside the same spaces as polynomials in μ.
  • The (quasi)shuffle product algebras stay closed under the extension when μ is adjoined to the ground field.
  • Closed-form expressions or derivation algorithms exist for the μ-extensions in all listed cases.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • μ could serve as a continuous deformation parameter to interpolate between different instances of these function spaces.
  • The algebraic preservation may support systematic reductions or recursions when μ is treated as an indeterminate in multi-loop calculations.
  • Explicit low-weight examples of μ-extended integrals over quadratic alphabets could be checked numerically to confirm polynomial closure.
  • The construction suggests similar extensions might be tested on other classes of functions that solve factorizing differential equations.

Load-bearing premise

The iterated integrals over the listed alphabets satisfy first-order factorizing differential equations whose solutions remain closed under the μ-extension within the stated function spaces.

What would settle it

An explicit μ-extension of an iterated integral over a linear-denominator or cyclotomic alphabet that produces a function outside the original space, or a square-root alphabet case that stays inside the original space as a polynomial in μ.

read the original abstract

The analytic integration of single-scale Feynman integrals emerging in perturbative calculations in quantum field theories can be performed within special classes of functions, which appear as consecutive generalizations of the polylogarithm in form of Kummer-Poincar\'e iterative integrals over special alphabets and extensions thereof. These are the polylogarithms, Nielsen integrals, the iterated integrals over linear denominator terms, cyclotomic letters, letters induced by quadratic forms, and square-root valued letters. These integrals are solutions of first-order factorizing differential equations. They are related to specific nested sums via the Mellin transform and their expansions around $x=0$. We construct the $\mu$-extensions of these iterated integrals and the associated nested sums. We present closed form solutions or provide algorithms in the case of more involved cases to derive the respective $\mu$-extensions and study the algebras of the $\mu$-extended function spaces. Except for the case of square-root valued alphabets, the $\mu$-extension maps into the same function space polynomially in $\mu$. This is also the case for the associated nested sums. For square-root valued alphabets or sums containing central binomials, the $\mu$-extension leads to higher transcendental functions. In all other cases the $\mu$-extension preserves the Hopf algebra structure implied by the (quasi)shuffle product, by supplementing $\mu$ to the ground field.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper constructs the μ-extension of iterated integrals over alphabets consisting of linear denominators, cyclotomic letters, letters from quadratic forms, and square-root valued letters, together with the associated nested sums obtained via Mellin transforms and series expansions around x=0. These functions solve first-order factorizing differential equations. The authors supply closed forms or algorithms for the more involved cases, study the resulting algebras, and claim that (except for square-root valued alphabets) the μ-extension remains inside the original function space and is polynomial in μ; the associated nested sums behave analogously. In all cases except square-root alphabets the construction preserves the Hopf algebra structure of the (quasi)shuffle product by adjoining μ to the ground field.

Significance. If the closure and algebra-preservation statements hold with the stated polynomial dependence on μ, the work supplies a systematic extension of the function spaces already used for single-scale Feynman integrals, which could facilitate symbolic manipulations at higher perturbative orders. The explicit algorithms for cyclotomic and quadratic cases add practical utility. The result is internally consistent with the differential-equation framework but its broader impact hinges on whether the new functions appear in actual multi-loop calculations; no such examples are supplied.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sections describing the cyclotomic and quadratic cases] The algorithmic constructions for the μ-extensions of cyclotomic and quadratic alphabets are presented without a termination argument or an a priori degree bound in μ. Such a bound is required to establish that the output remains inside the original function space for arbitrary depth and does not introduce new letters or non-polynomial μ-dependence; the abstract-level description of the algorithms does not address this point.
  2. [Abstract and introductory sections] No explicit derivations, verification steps, or error bounds are given for the claimed closed forms or the mapping results, even though the central statements concern polynomial closure and Hopf-algebra preservation.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'the listed alphabets' without an explicit enumeration in the opening paragraph; a short table or numbered list would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and valuable feedback on our manuscript. The comments highlight areas where additional rigor can strengthen the presentation of the algorithmic constructions and the supporting derivations. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Sections describing the cyclotomic and quadratic cases] The algorithmic constructions for the μ-extensions of cyclotomic and quadratic alphabets are presented without a termination argument or an a priori degree bound in μ. Such a bound is required to establish that the output remains inside the original function space for arbitrary depth and does not introduce new letters or non-polynomial μ-dependence; the abstract-level description of the algorithms does not address this point.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit termination argument and a priori degree bound on the polynomial dependence in μ would make the closure property fully rigorous for arbitrary depth. The algorithms are defined recursively via the first-order factorizing differential equations and the quasi-shuffle product, which by construction map back into the original alphabet without introducing new letters; the degree in μ is controlled by the weight of the iterated integral. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection (in the cyclotomic and quadratic sections) that supplies an inductive proof of termination together with an explicit upper bound on the degree in μ, obtained from the weight filtration and the structure constants of the Hopf algebra. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract and introductory sections] No explicit derivations, verification steps, or error bounds are given for the claimed closed forms or the mapping results, even though the central statements concern polynomial closure and Hopf-algebra preservation.

    Authors: The abstract and introduction are concise summaries; the explicit closed forms, their derivations from the differential equations, and the verification of the polynomial mapping appear in the body of the paper (Sections 3–6). Nevertheless, we acknowledge that additional explicit steps and checks would improve readability. In the revision we will insert a short appendix containing (i) step-by-step derivations of the principal closed forms for the linear and cyclotomic cases, (ii) low-depth numerical verifications confirming both the polynomial dependence on μ and the preservation of the quasi-shuffle relations, and (iii) a brief discussion of the absence of error bounds (the constructions are exact algebraic identities, not numerical approximations). The abstract itself will remain unchanged as it correctly states the results. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: μ-extension defined independently and studied via explicit constructions

full rationale

The paper defines the μ-extension via the action of a formal parameter on iterated integrals that solve first-order factorizing differential equations over given alphabets (linear, cyclotomic, quadratic, square-root). It supplies closed forms or algorithms for the extensions and states the polynomial closure property (except for square-root cases) as a derived outcome of those constructions, together with the preservation of the (quasi)shuffle Hopf algebra by adjoining μ to the ground field. No quoted step reduces the central claim to a fitted input renamed as prediction, a self-definitional loop, or a load-bearing self-citation whose content is presupposed; the derivation chain remains self-contained against the differential-equation starting point.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the existence and differential-equation properties of the listed iterated integrals and their Mellin-transform relation to nested sums; μ is introduced as a formal extension parameter rather than fitted to data.

free parameters (1)
  • μ
    Formal extension parameter introduced to define the new family of functions; not fitted to any numerical data.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The iterated integrals over the listed alphabets are solutions of first-order factorizing differential equations.
    Stated explicitly in the abstract as the starting point for the function classes considered.
  • domain assumption The Mellin transform relates the iterated integrals to the associated nested sums.
    Invoked in the abstract to connect the two families whose μ-extensions are studied.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5801 in / 1492 out tokens · 18827 ms · 2026-06-27T08:38:24.852762+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

140 extracted references · 51 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Ernst,A Comprehensive Treatment ofq-Calculus, (Springer (Birkh ¨auser), Basel, 2012)

    T. Ernst,A Comprehensive Treatment ofq-Calculus, (Springer (Birkh ¨auser), Basel, 2012)

  2. [2]

    Euler,De partitione numerorum, Novi Commentarii Academiae Scientiarum Petropolitanae3(1753) 125–169

    L. Euler,De partitione numerorum, Novi Commentarii Academiae Scientiarum Petropolitanae3(1753) 125–169. 30

  3. [3]

    Heine, ¨Uber die Reihe 1+ ...(Aus einem Schreiben an Lejeune Dirichlet), J

    E. Heine, ¨Uber die Reihe 1+ ...(Aus einem Schreiben an Lejeune Dirichlet), J. Reine Angew. Mathematik 34(1847) 285–328

  4. [4]

    Heine,Theorie der Kugelfunctionen und der verwandten Functionen, (Verlag G

    E. Heine,Theorie der Kugelfunctionen und der verwandten Functionen, (Verlag G. Reimer, Berlin, 1878); Neudruck, (Physica Verlag, W¨urzburg, 1961)

  5. [5]

    Bailey,Generalized Hypergeometric Series, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1935)

    W.N. Bailey,Generalized Hypergeometric Series, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1935)

  6. [6]

    Slater,Generalized Hypergeometric Functions, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1966)

    L.J. Slater,Generalized Hypergeometric Functions, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1966)

  7. [7]

    Exton,q-Hypergeometric Functions and Applications, (Ellis Horwood, Chichester, 1983)

    H. Exton,q-Hypergeometric Functions and Applications, (Ellis Horwood, Chichester, 1983)

  8. [8]

    Gasper, M

    G. Gasper, M. Rahman,Basic hypergeometric series, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990)

  9. [9]

    Koornwinder,Special functions andq-commuting variables, Fields Institute Communications, Ameri- can Mathematical Society,14(1997) 131–166 [arXiv:q-alg/9608008v2]

    T.H. Koornwinder,Special functions andq-commuting variables, Fields Institute Communications, Ameri- can Mathematical Society,14(1997) 131–166 [arXiv:q-alg/9608008v2]

  10. [10]

    Andrews, R

    G.E. Andrews, R. Askey, R. Roy,Special Functions, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999)

  11. [11]

    Kac and P

    V. Kac and P. Cheung,Quantum Calculus, (Springer, New York, 2002)

  12. [12]

    Olver, D.W

    F.W.J. Olver, D.W. Lozier, R.F. Boisvert, C.W. Clark,NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions, (Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010)

  13. [13]

    Schwenk and J

    J. Schwenk and J. Wess,A q-deformed quantum mechanical toy model, Phys. Lett. B291(1992) 273–277

  14. [14]

    Wess,q-deformed Heisenberg algebra, PoS (Corfu98) 015

    J. Wess,q-deformed Heisenberg algebra, PoS (Corfu98) 015

  15. [15]

    Klimyk and K

    A. Klimyk and K. Schm ¨udgen,Quantum groups and their representations, (Springer, Berlin, 1997)

  16. [16]

    Kassel,Quantum Groups, (Springer, Berlin, 1995)

    C. Kassel,Quantum Groups, (Springer, Berlin, 1995)

  17. [17]

    Aref’eva and I.V

    I.Y. Aref’eva and I.V. Volovich,The master field for QCD and q deformed quantum field theory, Nucl. Phys. B462(1996) 600–612 [arXiv:hep-th/9510210 [hep-th]]

  18. [18]

    Wachter,Towards a q-Deformed Quantum Field Theoryin:Quantum Field Theory - Competitive Models, (Springer, Berlin 2008), 261–283, Eds

    H. Wachter,Towards a q-Deformed Quantum Field Theoryin:Quantum Field Theory - Competitive Models, (Springer, Berlin 2008), 261–283, Eds. B. Fauser, J. Tolksdorf, and E. Zeidler

  19. [19]

    Connes,Non-commutative differential geometry, Institut des Hautes Etudes Scientifiques

    A. Connes,Non-commutative differential geometry, Institut des Hautes Etudes Scientifiques. Extrait des Publications Mathematiques n o 62 (1986)

  20. [20]

    Connes,Noncommutative geometry, (Academic Press, New York, 1995)

    A. Connes,Noncommutative geometry, (Academic Press, New York, 1995)

  21. [21]

    Landau and R

    L.D. Landau and R. Peierls,Erweiterung des Unbestimmtheitsprinzips f ¨ur die relativistische Quantentheorie, Z. Phys.69(1931) 56–69

  22. [22]

    Heisenberg, ¨Uber die in der Theorie der Elementarteilchen auftretende universelle L ¨ange, Ann

    W. Heisenberg, ¨Uber die in der Theorie der Elementarteilchen auftretende universelle L ¨ange, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig)32(1938) 20–33

  23. [23]

    Snyder,Quantized space-time, Phys

    H.S. Snyder,Quantized space-time, Phys. Rev.71(1947) 38–41

  24. [24]

    Kowalski-Glikman and S

    J. Kowalski-Glikman and S. Nowak,Noncommutative space-time of doubly special relativity theories, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D12(2003) 299–316 [arXiv:hep-th/0204245 [hep-th]]

  25. [25]

    Chaichian and A.P

    M. Chaichian and A.P. Demichev,Quantum Poincar´ e group, Phys. Lett. B304(1993) 220–224

  26. [26]

    Yu. I. Manin,Quantum groups and non-commutative geometry, Commun. Math. Phys.123(1989) 163–175

  27. [27]

    Toller,Events in a noncommutative space-time, Phys

    M. Toller,Events in a noncommutative space-time, Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 024006 [arXiv:hep-th/0305121 [hep-th]]

  28. [28]

    Jannussis,New deformed Heisenberg oscillator, J

    A. Jannussis,New deformed Heisenberg oscillator, J. Phys. A: Math. General26(1993) L233–L237. 31

  29. [29]

    Gavrilik and A.P

    A.M. Gavrilik and A.P. Rebesh,Intercepts of the momentum correlation functions inµ–Bose gas model and their asymptotics, Eur. Phys. J. A47(2011) 55 [arXiv:1007.5187 [quant-ph]]

  30. [30]

    Albert,Power-associative rings, Trans

    A.A. Albert,Power-associative rings, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.64(1948) 552–593

  31. [31]

    Gavrilik, I.I

    A.M. Gavrilik, I.I. Kachurik and A.P. Rebesh,Quasi-Fibonacci oscillators, J. Phys. A43(2010) 245204 [arXiv:1002.0601 [quant-ph]]

  32. [32]

    Gavrilik, I.I

    A.M. Gavrilik, I.I. Kachurik and A.P. Rebesh,Thermostatistics ofµ-deformed analog of Bose gas model, [arXiv: 1309.1363 [cond-mat.stat-mech]]

  33. [33]

    A. M. Gavrilik and Y. A. Mishchenko,Exact expressions for the intercepts ofr-particle momentum corre- lation functions inµ-Bose gas modelPhys. Lett. A376(2012) 2484–2489 [arXiv:1204.3067 [math-ph]]

  34. [35]

    Gavrilik and Y.A

    A.M. Gavrilik and Y.A. Mishchenko,Virial coefficients in the(˜µ, q)-deformed Bose gas model related to compositeness of particles and their interaction: Temperature-dependence problem, Phys. Rev. E90(2014) no.5, 052147 [arXiv:1409.3423 [cond-mat.stat-mech]]

  35. [36]

    Gavrilik and Y.A

    A.M. Gavrilik and Y.A. Mishchenko,Deformed Bose gas models aimed at taking into account both compos- iteness of particles and their interaction, Ukr. J. Phys.58(2013) 1171–1177 [arXiv:1312.1573 [math-ph]]

  36. [37]

    Gavrilik and Y.A

    A.M. Gavrilik and Y.A. Mishchenko,Entanglement in composite bosons realized by deformed oscillators, Phys. Lett. A376(2012) 1596–1600 [arXiv:1108.0936 [quant-ph]]

  37. [38]

    Gavrilik and Y.A

    A.M. Gavrilik and Y.A. Mishchenko,Energy dependence of the entanglement entropy of composite boson (quasiboson) systems, J. Phys. A46(2013) 145301 [arXiv:1211.1907 [quant-ph]]

  38. [39]

    Gavrilik and Y.A

    A.M. Gavrilik and Y.A. Mishchenko,Correlation function intercepts for˜µ, q-deformed Bose gas model implying effective accounting for interaction and compositeness of particles, Nucl. Phys. B891(2015) 466– 481 [arXiv:1411.5955 [hep-ph]]

  39. [40]

    Gavrilik,Geometric Aspects and Some Uses of Deformed Models of Thermostatistics, Universe4(2018) no.2, 33

    A. Gavrilik,Geometric Aspects and Some Uses of Deformed Models of Thermostatistics, Universe4(2018) no.2, 33

  40. [41]

    Gavrilik, I.I

    A.M. Gavrilik, I.I. Kachurik, M.V. Khelashvili and A.V. Nazarenko, Physica A506(2018) 835–843 [arXiv:1805.02504 [gr-qc]]

  41. [42]

    Gavrilik, I.I

    A.M. Gavrilik, I.I. Kachurik and M.V. Khelashvili,Galaxy Rotation Curves in theµ-Deformation Based Approach to Dark Matter, Ukr. J. Phys.64(2019) no.11, 1042–1049 [arXiv:1910.10796 [physics.gen-ph]]

  42. [43]

    Mykhailiv, Y.A

    O.P. Mykhailiv, Y.A. Mishchenko and A.M. Gavrilik,Theµ-Deformed Einstein Field Equations withµ- Dependent Effective Cosmological ConstantUkr. J. Phys.70(2025) no.12, 831–843. [arXiv:2511.17790 [gr- qc]]

  43. [44]

    Chung, A.M

    W.S. Chung, A.M. Gavrilik and A.V. Nazarenko,Photon gas at the Planck scale within the doubly special relativity, Physica A533(2019) 121928 [arXiv:1808.01243 [hep-th]]

  44. [45]

    Gavrilik and I.I

    A.M. Gavrilik and I.I. Kachurik,Three-parameter (two-sided) deformation of Heisenberg algebra, Mod. Phys. Lett. A27(2012) 1250114 [arXiv:1204.2817 [math-ph]]

  45. [46]

    Gavrilik, I.I

    A.M. Gavrilik, I.I. Kachurik and A.V. Nazarenko,New deformed Heisenberg algebra from theµ-deformed model of dark matter, Front. Astron. Space Sci.10(2023) 1133976 [arXiv:2304.05840 [astro-ph.GA]]

  46. [47]

    Frenkel and A

    E. Frenkel and A. Szenes,Dilogarithm identities, q-difference equations and the Virasoro algebra, Duke Math. J., Int. Math. Res. Notices,2(1993) 53–60 [hep-th/9212094]

  47. [48]

    Faddeev and R.M

    L.D. Faddeev and R.M. Kashaev,Quantum Dilogarithm, Mod. Phys. Lett. A9(1994) 427–434 [hep-th/ 9310070]. 32

  48. [49]

    Napier,Mirifici Logarithmorum Canonis Descriptio, (A

    J. Napier,Mirifici Logarithmorum Canonis Descriptio, (A. Hart, Edinburgh, 1614)

  49. [50]

    Hobson (1914),John Napier and the invention of logarithms, 1614, (Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 1914)

    E.W. Hobson (1914),John Napier and the invention of logarithms, 1614, (Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 1914)

  50. [51]

    Leibniz,Leibnizens mathematische Schriften, ed

    G.W. Leibniz,Leibnizens mathematische Schriften, ed. C.I. Gerhardt, Vol.III(H.W. Schmidt, Halle, 1855); Letter IX, pp. 56–62, January 1697; Letter XXXVIII, pp. 334–336, November 1696; Letter XXXIX, pp. 337–338, November 1696; Letter XLI, pp. 347–354, December 1696

  51. [52]

    Maximom,The dilogarithm function for complex argument, Proc

    L.C. Maximom,The dilogarithm function for complex argument, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A459(2003) 2807– 2819

  52. [53]

    Spence,An essay of the theory of the various orders of logarithmic transcendents; with an inquiry into their applications to the integral calculus and the summation of series, (J

    W. Spence,An essay of the theory of the various orders of logarithmic transcendents; with an inquiry into their applications to the integral calculus and the summation of series, (J. Murray, London, 1809)

  53. [54]

    Jonqui´ ere,Ueber eine Klasse von Transcendenten, welche durch mehrmahlige Integration rationaler Funktionen entstehen, ¨Ofversigt af Kongl

    A. Jonqui´ ere,Ueber eine Klasse von Transcendenten, welche durch mehrmahlige Integration rationaler Funktionen entstehen, ¨Ofversigt af Kongl. Vetenskaps-Akademiens F¨orhandlingar45(1888) 522–531

  54. [55]

    Lewin,Dilogarithms and Associated Functions(MacDonald, London, 1958)

    L. Lewin,Dilogarithms and Associated Functions(MacDonald, London, 1958)

  55. [56]

    Devoto and D.W

    A. Devoto and D.W. Duke,Table of Integrals and Formulae for Feynman Diagram Calculations, Riv. Nuovo Cim.7N6(1984) 1–39

  56. [57]

    Lewin,Polylogarithms and Associated Functions, (North Holland, New York, 1981)

    L. Lewin,Polylogarithms and Associated Functions, (North Holland, New York, 1981)

  57. [58]

    Nielsen,Der Eulersche Dilogarithmus und seine Verallgemeinerungen, Nova Acta Leopoldina,90(1909) 123–211

    N. Nielsen,Der Eulersche Dilogarithmus und seine Verallgemeinerungen, Nova Acta Leopoldina,90(1909) 123–211

  58. [59]

    K ¨olbig,Nielsen generalized polylogarithms, SIAM J

    K.S. K ¨olbig,Nielsen generalized polylogarithms, SIAM J. Math. Anal.17(1986) 1232–1258

  59. [60]

    Remiddi and J.A.M

    E. Remiddi and J.A.M. Vermaseren,Harmonic polylogarithms, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A15(2000) 725–754 [hep-ph/9905237]

  60. [61]

    Kummer,Ueber die Transcendenten, welche aus wiederholten Integrationen rationaler Formeln entste- hen, J

    E.E. Kummer,Ueber die Transcendenten, welche aus wiederholten Integrationen rationaler Formeln entste- hen, J. Reine Angew. Math. (Crelle)21(1840) 74–90

  61. [62]

    Kummer,Ueber die Transcendenten, welche aus wiederholten Integrationen rationaler Formeln entste- hen (Fortsetzung), J

    E.E. Kummer,Ueber die Transcendenten, welche aus wiederholten Integrationen rationaler Formeln entste- hen (Fortsetzung), J. Reine Angew. Math. (Crelle)21(1840) 193–225

  62. [63]

    Kummer,Ueber die Transcendenten, welche aus wiederholten Integrationen rationaler Formeln entste- hen (Fortsetzung), J

    E.E. Kummer,Ueber die Transcendenten, welche aus wiederholten Integrationen rationaler Formeln entste- hen (Fortsetzung), J. Reine Angew. Math. (Crelle)21(1840) 328–371

  63. [64]

    Poincar´ e,Sur les groupes des ´ equations lin´ eaires, Acta Math.4(1884) 201–312

    H. Poincar´ e,Sur les groupes des ´ equations lin´ eaires, Acta Math.4(1884) 201–312

  64. [65]

    Lappo-Danilevsky,M´ emoirs sur la Th´ eorie des Syst` emes Diff´ erentielles Lin´ eaires, (Chelsea Publ

    J.A. Lappo-Danilevsky,M´ emoirs sur la Th´ eorie des Syst` emes Diff´ erentielles Lin´ eaires, (Chelsea Publ. Co, New York, 1953)

  65. [66]

    Chen,Algebras of Iterated Path Integrals and Fundamental Groups, Trans

    K.T. Chen,Algebras of Iterated Path Integrals and Fundamental Groups, Trans. A.M.S.156(3) (1971) 359–379

  66. [67]

    Goncharov,Multiple polylogarithms, cyclotomy and modular complexes, Math

    A.B. Goncharov,Multiple polylogarithms, cyclotomy and modular complexes, Math. Res. Lett.5(1998) 497–516 [arXiv:1105.2076 [math.AG]]

  67. [68]

    S. Moch, P. Uwer and S. Weinzierl,Nested sums, expansion of transcendental functions and multiscale multiloop integrals, J. Math. Phys.43(2002) 3363–3386 [hep-ph/0110083]

  68. [69]

    Ablinger, J

    J. Ablinger, J. Bl ¨umlein and C. Schneider,Analytic and Algorithmic Aspects of Generalized Harmonic Sums and Polylogarithms, J. Math. Phys.54(2013) 082301 [arXiv:1302.0378 [math-ph]]

  69. [70]

    Ablinger, J

    J. Ablinger, J. Bl ¨umlein and C. Schneider,Harmonic Sums and Polylogarithms Generated by Cyclotomic Polynomials, J. Math. Phys.52(2011) 102301 [arXiv:1105.6063 [math-ph]]. 33

  70. [71]

    Ablinger, J

    J. Ablinger, J. Bl ¨umlein and C. Schneider,Iterated integrals over letters induced by quadratic forms, Phys. Rev. D103(2021) no.9, 096025 [arXiv:2103.08330 [hep-th]]

  71. [72]

    Ablinger, J

    J. Ablinger, J. Bl ¨umlein, C.G. Raab and C. Schneider,Iterated Binomial Sums and their Associated Iterated Integrals, J. Math. Phys.55(2014) 112301 [arXiv:1407.1822 [hep-th]]

  72. [73]

    Vermaseren,Harmonic sums, Mellin transforms and integrals, Int

    J.A.M. Vermaseren,Harmonic sums, Mellin transforms and integrals, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A14(1999) 2037–2076 [hep-ph/9806280]

  73. [74]

    Bl ¨umlein and S

    J. Bl ¨umlein and S. Kurth,Harmonic sums and Mellin transforms up to two loop order, Phys. Rev. D60 (1999) 014018 [hep-ph/9810241]

  74. [75]

    Kauers,Guessing Handbook, JKU Linz, Technical Report RISC 09–07

    M. Kauers,Guessing Handbook, JKU Linz, Technical Report RISC 09–07

  75. [76]

    Bl ¨umlein, M

    J. Bl ¨umlein, M. Kauers, S. Klein and C. Schneider, Comput. Phys. Commun.180(2009) 2143–2165 [arXiv: 0902.4091 [hep-ph]]

  76. [77]

    Sage,http://www.sagemath.org/

  77. [78]

    Kauers, M

    M. Kauers, M. Jaroschek, and F. Johansson, in:Computer Algebra and Polynomials, Editors: J. Gutierrez, J. Schicho, Josef, M. Weimann, Eds.. Lecture Notes in Computer Science8942(Springer, Berlin, 2015) 105–125 [arXiv:1306.4263 [cs.SC]]

  78. [79]

    Schneider,Symbolic Summation Assists Combinatorics, S´ em

    C. Schneider,Symbolic Summation Assists Combinatorics, S´ em. Lothar. Combin.56(2007) 1–36 article B56b

  79. [80]

    C. Schneider,Simplifying Multiple Sums in Difference Fields, in:Computer Algebra in Quantum Field The- ory: Integration, Summation and Special FunctionsTexts and Monographs in Symbolic Computation eds. C. Schneider and J. Bl ¨umlein (Springer, Wien, 2013) 325–360 [arXiv:1304.4134 [cs.SC]]

  80. [81]

    Hoffman,Quasi-Shuffle Products, Journal of Algebraic Combinatorics11(2000) 49–68 [arXiv:math/ 9907173]

    M.E. Hoffman,Quasi-Shuffle Products, Journal of Algebraic Combinatorics11(2000) 49–68 [arXiv:math/ 9907173]

Showing first 80 references.