Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 2 minor 2 cited by

Ultraviolet Imaging of SR 12 c with HST/WFC3: Accretion and Variability of a Giant Planet at the End Stages of Growth

T0 review · 1 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-27 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read HST ultraviolet imaging shows SR 12 c accreting too slowly to grow much further and has reached the end stages of giant planet assembly.

desk verdict New HST UV data gives a clean accretion luminosity and rate for SR 12 c plus a broad SED, but the end-stages claim rests on prior mass and age without uncertainty checks. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.12862 v1 pith:SB55H6GT submitted 2026-06-11 astro-ph.EP

Claire O. Finley , Brendan P. Bowler , Ya-Lin Wu , Adam L. Kraus , Yifan Zhou , Yuhiko Aoyama , William Best , Ian Czekala
show 7 more authors
Catherine C. Espaillat Katherine B. Follette Gregory J. Herczeg Raquel A. Martinez Connor E. Robinson Quang H. Tran Kimberly Ward-Duong
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EP
keywords SR12cgiantplanetaccretionultravioletimagingHST/WFC3Balmerjumpplanetary-masscompanionspectralenergydistributionendstagesofgrowth
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper uses new 0.2–0.7 micron imaging from the Hubble Space Telescope's Wide Field Camera 3 to examine the young wide-orbit companion SR 12 c. Strong continuum excess blueward of 5000 angstroms and a clear Balmer jump at 3646 angstroms are detected, which are converted into an accretion luminosity of 1.65 ± 0.19 × 10^{-5} solar luminosities and a mass accretion rate of 8 ± 2 × 10^{-12} solar masses per year. Given the companion's mass and age, this rate implies no appreciable additional growth, so the object sits at the final phase of its formation. The observations also show no variability across one month but a 90 percent drop in H-alpha strength over five years, and they complete a full spectral energy distribution from ultraviolet to submillimeter wavelengths.

What carries the argument

HST/WFC3 ultraviolet-through-red imaging that captures the accretion-driven continuum excess and Balmer discontinuity to calculate accretion luminosity and mass accretion rate.

What would settle it

An independent mass or age determination for SR 12 c that is substantially different from current values, or future monitoring that shows the accretion rate rising enough to allow significant mass gain before disk dispersal.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

SR 12 c exhibits strong accretion-related continuum excess blueward of ∼5000 Å and clear signs of the Balmer jump at 3646 Å. We derive a total accretion luminosity of 1.65 ± 0.19 × 10^{-5} L_⊙ and a mass accretion rate of 8 ± 2× 10^{-12} M_⊙ yr^{-1}. Based on its mass and age, SR 12 c will not grow by an appreciable amount at its current accretion rate; it is at the end stages of assembly. No accretion variability is evident between the two epochs of the WFC3 observations spanning a month-long baseline, but the Hα emission line strength decreases by 90% compared to the reported flux from five years earlier.

Load-bearing premise

The mass and age of SR 12 c determined in prior work are accurate enough that the measured accretion rate means no appreciable further growth will occur.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • SR 12 c will not grow by an appreciable amount at its current accretion rate.
  • Accretion shows no variability over a one-month baseline but the H-alpha line has dropped 90 percent in five years.
  • SR 12 c joins the small sample of young giant planets with both accretion and disk constraints from ultraviolet to submillimeter wavelengths.
  • These data help map the range of timescales and physical processes that finish giant planet formation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The low rate may mark the point where a gap or disk dispersal begins to starve the companion of further material.
  • Repeating the ultraviolet imaging on other wide-orbit companions would test whether late-stage low accretion is common.
  • The assembled spectral energy distribution could be modeled to place limits on any remaining circumplanetary disk mass.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports new HST/WFC3 0.2–0.7 μm imaging of the wide-orbit planetary-mass companion SR 12 c. The data show strong continuum excess blueward of ∼5000 Å and a clear Balmer jump at 3646 Å. From these observations the authors derive an accretion luminosity L_acc = 1.65 ± 0.19 × 10^{-5} L_⊙ and mass accretion rate Ṁ = 8 ± 2 × 10^{-12} M_⊙ yr^{-1}. They conclude that, given the companion’s mass and age, SR 12 c will experience negligible further growth and is therefore at the end stages of assembly. No variability is detected between the two WFC3 epochs separated by one month, although Hα has declined 90 % relative to a measurement five years earlier. The work also compiles a UV-to-sub-mm SED for the object.

Significance. The UV detection of accretion signatures and the resulting L_acc and Ṁ values constitute a direct, observationally grounded constraint on late-stage gas accretion onto a giant planet. The assembled multi-wavelength SED adds a well-characterized object to the small sample of young planets with both accretion and disk diagnostics. These measurements are independent of the interpretive claim about growth stage and therefore remain valuable even if the end-stage conclusion is qualified.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and growth-stage discussion] Abstract (and the paragraph discussing growth stage): the statement that SR 12 c “will not grow by an appreciable amount at its current accretion rate” and “is at the end stages of assembly” rests on external mass and radius values adopted from prior studies. Because Ṁ = L_acc R / (G M), uncertainties in M and R propagate directly into both the quoted accretion rate and the integrated mass that could be accreted over the remaining lifetime. No error propagation or sensitivity test of these priors is presented, so the quantitative strength of the “end stages” claim cannot be assessed from the manuscript alone.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the new imaging covers 0.2–0.7 μm while the assembled SED extends to 880 μm; explicitly distinguish the wavelength range of the WFC3 data from the compiled SED in the abstract and §1.
  2. Table or text listing the exact mass, radius, and age values (with references) used to convert L_acc to Ṁ and to evaluate total growth would improve transparency and allow readers to reproduce the end-stage assessment.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the UV detection, accretion measurements, and SED compilation, and for the recommendation of minor revision. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and growth-stage discussion] Abstract (and the paragraph discussing growth stage): the statement that SR 12 c “will not grow by an appreciable amount at its current accretion rate” and “is at the end stages of assembly” rests on external mass and radius values adopted from prior studies. Because Ṁ = L_acc R / (G M), uncertainties in M and R propagate directly into both the quoted accretion rate and the integrated mass that could be accreted over the remaining lifetime. No error propagation or sensitivity test of these priors is presented, so the quantitative strength of the “end stages” claim cannot be assessed from the manuscript alone.

    Authors: We agree that the growth-stage conclusion depends on the adopted mass and radius, and that the lack of propagated uncertainties or sensitivity tests limits the ability to assess the robustness of the 'end stages' statement. In the revised manuscript we will (1) explicitly propagate the literature uncertainties on M and R through the Ṁ calculation and the integrated mass estimate over the remaining disk lifetime, and (2) add a short sensitivity table or figure showing how the accreted mass changes across the plausible mass range (approximately 5–15 M_Jup) reported in the discovery and follow-up papers. These additions will be placed in the discussion section and referenced from the abstract. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; new UV measurements independent of growth-stage conclusion

full rationale

The paper's core derivation consists of new HST/WFC3 photometry yielding an observed UV continuum excess and Balmer jump, from which L_acc and Ṁ are computed via standard relations. The interpretive statement that SR 12 c 'will not grow by an appreciable amount' and 'is at the end stages of assembly' invokes external prior mass and age values; these are independent inputs rather than quantities defined or fitted within the present work. No self-definitional loops, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, load-bearing self-citations, or ansatz smuggling occur. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on standard domain assumptions for interpreting UV excess as accretion and on previously published mass and age values for SR 12 c.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption The observed UV continuum excess and Balmer jump are caused by gas accretion onto the planet
    This is the standard interpretation used for young accreting objects in the field.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ultraviolet Imaging of SR 12 c with HST/WFC3: Accretion and Variability of a Giant Planet at the End Stages of Growth." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SB55H6GT

@misc{pith2026260612862,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ultraviolet Imaging of SR 12 c with HST/WFC3: Accretion and Variability of a Giant Planet at the End Stages of Growth},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SB55H6GT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.12862}
}
abstract

Many details of the gas accretion phase during giant planet formation remain untested. We present new 0.2$\unicode{x2013}$0.7 $\mu$m UV-through-red optical imaging of the young, wide-orbit planetary-mass companion SR 12 c from the Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3) instrument on board the Hubble Space Telescope. SR 12 c exhibits strong accretion-related continuum excess blueward of $\sim$5000 $\unicode{x212B}$ and clear signs of the Balmer jump at 3646 $\unicode{x212B}$. We derive a total accretion luminosity of 1.65 $\pm$ $0.19 \times 10^{-5} L_{\odot}$ and a mass accretion rate of 8 $\pm$ $2\times 10^{-12}$ M$_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$. Based on its mass and age, SR 12 c will not grow by an appreciable amount at its current accretion rate; it is at the end stages of assembly. No accretion variability is evident between the two epochs of the WFC3 observations spanning a month-long baseline, but the H$\alpha$ emission line strength decreases by 90% compared to the reported flux from five years earlier. Combined with previous observations of SR 12 c, we assemble one of the most complete spectral energy distributions of a young giant planet to date, spanning the UV through sub-mm wavelengths (0.2$\unicode{x2013}$880 $\mu$m). This adds SR 12 c to the small yet growing sample of planets with detailed accretion and disk constraints, which together are beginning to establish the diversity of timescales and physical processes governing the formation of giant planets.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.12862 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. SR 12 c and its host binary, SR 12 AB in the Hα filter (F656N) from HST/WFC3. North is up and East is left. In a companion paper (Wu et al., submitted), we present new complementary 5.6–21 µm imaging from the Mid-Infrared Instrument (MIRI) on board the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). This mid-IR photom￾etry is best described by a two-component blackbody model, although irradiated flat disk and viscous accre￾tion … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Top: HST/WFC3-UVIS images of SR 12 AB from Epoch 1 spanning the UV through optical. The binary components are marginally resolved in all filters. Each image is 40×40 pixels, or about 1.56×1.56′′. North is up and East is left. Bottom: Co-added HST/WFC3-UVIS images of SR 12 c spanning the UV through optical. The signal-to-noise ratio of each of these detections are: 7.38, 12.7, 7.50, 10.5, and 108, for F225W, F336W, F… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The combined SED for SR 12 AB described by a BT-Settl model at Teff of 3800 K. Interstellar reddening ranging from AV =0 to 4 mag is shown with 0.5 mag spacing. The best fit yields an extinction of AV =0.85, which is what we adopt for the host and its distant companion, SR 12 c. relations between spectral type and Teff from Pecaut & Mamajek (2013) to derive an estimated Teff of 3850 K. For this work we adopt 3800 K … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The 0.2–880 µm SED of SR 12 c, with three primary sources of emission: accretion in the UV, the photosphere in the near-infrared, and a circumplanetary disk spanning the mid-IR to mm wavelengths. In the UV, the best-fitting hydrogen slab model (Valenti et al. 1993; Her…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The strength of the Balmer jump modeled by the hydrogen slab as a function of column density (ne) and temperature. The size of the jump is represented by the ratio of the flux coming from 3600 ˚A to 3700 ˚A. Note that the overall strength of the jump increases with tem…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The effect of changing density and temperature on the size and shape of the Balmer jump in the hydrogen slab models. Upper left: At a fixed temperature (T = 8000 K, in this case), varying number density affects the shape of the Balmer jump. Higher densities cause the s…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Joint constraints on hydrogen slab model den￾sity and temperature from the MCMC posterior sampling. The marginalized temperature and density distributions are shown in the top and right panels, respectively. The best-fit model (as determined from the MAP value) is plot…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The percent change in flux of SR 12 c from Epoch 1 to Epoch 2 of the HST observations, plotted as a function of the central wavelength of each filter. There is no evidence for significant variability in any of the filters over the month￾long baseline. 4.1.1. Accretion …
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Log M˙ versus log M∗ for accreting stellar and substellar objects as measured by UV continuum excess from the CASPAR database (Betti et al. 2023), Zhou et al. (2014, 2021), and this work. Stars are shown as teal triangles, brown dwarfs are blue circles, and planetary-…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Asymmetric, variable H$\alpha$ line profile in planetary mass object SR 12 c

    astro-ph.EP 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SR 12 c's Hα profile is asymmetric, blueshifted, and variable on hourly timescales, consistent with magnetospheric accretion but not ruling out a boundary-layer plus failed-wind model.

  2. A Retrieval Framework for Observationally Constraining the Parameters of Circumplanetary Disks

    astro-ph.EP 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A calibrated thick-disk semianalytic model plus MCMC retrieval quantifies SED constraints on CPD parameters and recovers consistent masses and accretion rates for PDS 70 b/c and GQ Lup b.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

124 extracted references · 118 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    C., & Batygin, K

    Adams, F. C., & Batygin, K. 2025, PASP, 137, 054401, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/adcf57

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/adcf57 2025

  2. [2]

    C., Taylor, A

    Adams, F. C., Taylor, A. G., & Meyer, M. R. 2025, PASP, 137, 084404, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/adfa44 Alcal´ a, J. M., Natta, A., Manara, C. F., et al. 2014, A&A, 561, A2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322254 Alcal´ a, J. M., Manara, C. F., Natta, A., et al. 2017, A&A, 600, A20, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629929

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/adfa44 2025

  3. [3]

    2004, A&A, 417, L25, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20040053

    Alibert, Y., Mordasini, C., & Benz, W. 2004, A&A, 417, L25, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20040053

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20040053 2004

  4. [4]

    2005, A&A, 434, 343, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20042032

    Alibert, Y., Mordasini, C., Benz, W., & Winisdoerffer, C. 2005, A&A, 434, 343, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20042032

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20042032 2005

  5. [5]

    The BT-Settl Model Atmospheres for Stars, Brown Dwarfs and Planets

    Allard, F. 2014, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 299, Exploring the Formation and Evolution of Planetary Systems, ed. M. Booth, B. C. Matthews, & J. R. Graham, 271–272, doi: 10.1017/S1743921313008545

    work page doi:10.1017/s1743921313008545 2014

  6. [6]

    Models of very-low-mass stars, brown dwarfs and exoplanets

    Allard, F., Homeier, D., & Freytag, B. 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, 370, 2765, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2011.0269

    work page doi:10.1098/rsta.2011.0269 2012

  7. [7]

    E., Myers, P

    Allen, L. E., Myers, P. C., Di Francesco, J., et al. 2002, ApJ, 566, 993, doi: 10.1086/338128

    work page doi:10.1086/338128 2002

  8. [8]

    M., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac00b9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...916...51A 916, 51

    Andrews, S. M., Elder, W., Zhang, S., et al. 2021, ApJ, 916, 51, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac00b9

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac00b9 2021

Show all 124 references
  1. [9]

    2018, ApJ, 866, 84, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aadc11

    Aoyama, Y., Ikoma, M., & Tanigawa, T. 2018, ApJ, 866, 84, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aadc11

    2018 doi

  2. [10]

    2020, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2011.06608, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2011.06608

    Aoyama, Y., Marleau, G.-D., Mordasini, C., & Ikoma, M. 2020, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2011.06608, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2011.06608

    2020 doi

  3. [11]

    R., Herczeg, G

    Ardila, D. R., Herczeg, G. J., Gregory, S. G., et al. 2013, ApJS, 207, 1, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/207/1/1

    2013 doi

  4. [12]

    M., Currie, T., et al

    Bailey, V., Hinz, P. M., Currie, T., et al. 2013, ApJ, 767, 31, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/767/1/31

    2013 doi

  5. [13]

    Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Allard, F., & Hauschildt, P. H. 1998, A&A, 337, 403, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9805009

    1998 doi arXiv

  6. [14]

    2015, A&A, 577, A42, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425481

    Baraffe, I., Homeier, D., Allard, F., & Chabrier, G. 2015, A&A, 577, A42, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425481

    2015 doi

  7. [15]

    2016, extinction v0.3.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.804967

    Barbary, K. 2016, extinction v0.3.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.804967

    2016 doi

  8. [16]

    Bate, M. R. 2009, MNRAS, 392, 590, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14106.x

    2009 doi

  9. [17]

    2021, ApJL, 916, L2, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac0f83

    Benisty, M., Bae, J., Facchini, S., et al. 2021, ApJL, 916, L2, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac0f83

    2021 doi

  10. [18]

    2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Benisty, M., Dominik, C., Follette, K., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka, Y. Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 605, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2203.09991

    2023 doi

  11. [19]

    2023, Comprehensive Archive of Substellar and Planetary Accretion Rates, 1.0.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8393054

    Betti, S., Follette, K., Ward-Duong, K., et al. 2023, Comprehensive Archive of Substellar and Planetary Accretion Rates, 1.0.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8393054

    2023 doi

  12. [20]

    K., Follette, K

    Betti, S. K., Follette, K. B., Ward-Duong, K., et al. 2022, ApJL, 935, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac85ef —. 2023, AJ, 166, 262, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad06b8

    2022 doi

  13. [21]

    2025, AJ, 169, 137, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad9b94

    Blakely, D., Johnstone, D., Cugno, G., et al. 2025, AJ, 169, 137, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad9b94

    2025 doi

  14. [22]

    Boss, A. P. 1997, Science, 276, 1836, doi: 10.1126/science.276.5320.1836

    1997 doi

  15. [23]

    Bowler, B. P. 2016, PASP, 128, 102001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/128/968/102001

    2016 doi

  16. [24]

    P., Andrews, S

    Bowler, B. P., Andrews, S. M., Kraus, A. L., et al. 2015, ApJL, 805, L17, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/805/2/L17

    2015 doi

  17. [25]

    P., Liu, M

    Bowler, B. P., Liu, M. C., Kraus, A. L., & Mann, A. W. 2014, ApJ, 784, 65, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/784/1/65

    2014 doi

  18. [26]

    Ireland, M. J. 2011, ApJ, 743, 148, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/743/2/148

    2011 doi

  19. [27]

    P., Kraus, A

    Bowler, B. P., Kraus, A. L., Bryan, M. L., et al. 2017, AJ, 154, 165, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa88bd

    2017 doi

  20. [28]

    P., Zhou, Y., Biddle, L

    Bowler, B. P., Zhou, Y., Biddle, L. I., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2502.14736, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2502.14736

    2025 doi

  21. [29]

    Brown, T. M. 2008, WFC3 TV3 Testing: Red Leak Checks for the UV Filters, Instrument Science Report WFC3 2008-49, 11 pages

    2008

  22. [30]

    2021, New time-dependent WFC3 UVIS inverse sensitivities, Instrument Science Report WFC3 2021-4, 33 pages

    Calamida, A., Mack, J., Medina, J., et al. 2021, New time-dependent WFC3 UVIS inverse sensitivities, Instrument Science Report WFC3 2021-4, 33 pages

    2021

  23. [31]

    1998, ApJ, 509, 802, doi: 10.1086/306527

    Calvet, N., & Gullbring, E. 1998, ApJ, 509, 802, doi: 10.1086/306527

    1998 doi

  24. [32]

    2004, AJ, 128, 1294, doi: 10.1086/422733 C´ anovas, H., Cantero, C., Cieza, L., et al

    Calvet, N., Muzerolle, J., Brice˜ no, C., et al. 2004, AJ, 128, 1294, doi: 10.1086/422733 C´ anovas, H., Cantero, C., Cieza, L., et al. 2019, A&A, 626, A80, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935321 19

    2004 doi

  25. [33]

    C., Magnier, E

    Chambers, K. C., Magnier, E. A., Metcalfe, N., et al. 2016, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1612.05560, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1612.05560

    2016 doi arXiv

  26. [34]

    M., Males, J

    Close, L. M., Males, J. R., Li, J., et al. 2025a, AJ, 169, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad8648

    doi

  27. [35]

    M., van Capelleveen, R

    Close, L. M., van Capelleveen, R. F., Weible, G., et al. 2025b, ApJL, 990, L9, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adf7a5

    doi

  28. [36]

    Cugno, G., & Grant, S. L. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.15209, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.15209

    2025 doi

  29. [37]

    2024, ApJL, 966, L21, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad3cbc

    Cugno, G., Patapis, P., Banzatti, A., et al. 2024, ApJL, 966, L21, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad3cbc

    2024 doi

  30. [38]

    2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 751, doi: 10.1038/s41550-022-01634-x

    Currie, T., Lawson, K., Schneider, G., et al. 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 751, doi: 10.1038/s41550-022-01634-x

    2022 doi

  31. [39]

    C., Marley, M

    Cushing, M. C., Marley, M. S., Saumon, D., et al. 2008, ApJ, 678, 1372, doi: 10.1086/526489

    2008 doi

  32. [40]

    M., Skrutskie, M

    Cutri, R. M., Skrutskie, M. F., van Dyk, S., et al. 2003, VizieR Online Data Catalog: 2MASS All-Sky Catalog of Point Sources (Cutri+ 2003), VizieR On-line Data Catalog: II/246. Originally published in: University of Massachusetts and Infrared Processing and Analysis Center, (I...

    2003

  33. [41]

    2023, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 676, A123, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346221 Dom´ ınguez-Jamett, O., Casassus, S., Baobab Liu, H., et al

    Demars, D., Bonnefoy, M., Dougados, C., et al. 2023, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 676, A123, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346221 Dom´ ınguez-Jamett, O., Casassus, S., Baobab Liu, H., et al. 2025, A&A, 702, A18, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554485

    2023 doi

  34. [42]

    H., Boss, A

    Durisen, R. H., Boss, A. P., Mayer, L., et al. 2007, in Protostars and Planets V, ed. B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, & K. Keil, 607, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0603179

    2007 doi arXiv

  35. [43]

    El-Badry, K., Rix, H.-W., & Heintz, T. M. 2021, MNRAS, 506, 2269, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab323

    2021 doi

  36. [44]

    C., Asensio Torres, R., Janson, M., et al

    Eriksson, S. C., Asensio Torres, R., Janson, M., et al. 2020, A&A, 638, L6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038131

    2020 doi

  37. [45]

    L., & Luhman, K

    Esplin, T. L., & Luhman, K. L. 2020, AJ, 159, 282, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab8dbd

    2020 doi

  38. [46]

    J., Allen, L

    Evans, II, N. J., Allen, L. E., Blake, G. A., et al. 2003, PASP, 115, 965, doi: 10.1086/376697

    2003 doi

  39. [47]

    Fitzpatrick, E. L. 1999, PASP, 111, 63, doi: 10.1086/316293

    1999 doi

  40. [48]

    B., Close, L

    Follette, K. B., Close, L. M., Males, J. R., et al. 2023, AJ, 165, 225, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/acc183

    2023 doi

  41. [49]

    Fruchter, A. S. e. 2010, in 2010 Space Telescope Science Institute Calibration Workshop, 382–387 Gaia Collaboration, Prusti, T., de Bruijne, J. H. J., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629272 Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., et al. 2018, A...

    2010 doi

  42. [50]

    Gelman, A., & Rubin, D. B. 1992, Statistical Science, 7, 457, doi: 10.1214/ss/1177011136

    1992 doi

  43. [51]

    1998, ApJ, 492, 323, doi: 10.1086/305032 G¨ unther, H

    Gullbring, E., Hartmann, L., Brice˜ no, C., & Calvet, N. 1998, ApJ, 492, 323, doi: 10.1086/305032 G¨ unther, H. M., Cody, A. M., Covey, K. R., et al. 2014, AJ, 148, 122, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/148/6/122

    1998 doi

  44. [52]

    Y., Bohn, A

    Haffert, S. Y., Bohn, A. J., de Boer, J., et al. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 749, doi: 10.1038/s41550-019-0780-5

    2019 doi

  45. [53]

    2016, ARA&A, 54, 135, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023347

    Hartmann, L., Herczeg, G., & Calvet, N. 2016, ARA&A, 54, 135, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023347

    2016 doi

  46. [54]

    Hastings, W. K. 1970, Biometrika, 57, 97, doi: 10.1093/biomet/57.1.97

    1970 doi

  47. [55]

    A., Templeton, M., Terrell, D., et al

    Henden, A. A., Templeton, M., Terrell, D., et al. 2016, VizieR Online Data Catalog: AAVSO Photometric All Sky Survey (APASS) DR9 (Henden+, 2016), VizieR On-line Data Catalog: II/336. Originally published in: 2015AAS...22533616H

    2016

  48. [56]

    J., Cruz, K

    Herczeg, G. J., Cruz, K. L., & Hillenbrand, L. A. 2009, ApJ, 696, 1589, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/696/2/1589

    2009 doi

  49. [57]

    J., & Hillenbrand, L

    Herczeg, G. J., & Hillenbrand, L. A. 2008, ApJ, 681, 594, doi: 10.1086/586728

    2008 doi

  50. [58]

    Hoch, K. K. W., Rowland, M., Petrus, S., et al. 2025, Nature, 643, 938, doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09174-w

    2025 doi

  51. [59]

    B., Sobeck, C., Haas, M., et al

    Howell, S. B., Sobeck, C., Haas, M., et al. 2014, PASP, 126, 398, doi: 10.1086/676406

    2014 doi

  52. [60]

    2003, Icarus, 166, 46, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2003.08.001

    Inaba, S., Wetherill, G., & Ikoma, M. 2003, Icarus, 166, 46, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2003.08.001

    2003 doi

  53. [61]

    2013, ApJ, 767, 112, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/767/2/112

    Ingleby, L., Calvet, N., Herczeg, G., et al. 2013, ApJ, 767, 112, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/767/2/112

    2013 doi

  54. [62]

    Hillenbrand, L. A. 2011, ApJ, 726, 113, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/726/2/113

    2011 doi

  55. [63]

    2019, ApJL, 879, L25, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab2a12

    Isella, A., Benisty, M., Teague, R., et al. 2019, ApJL, 879, L25, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab2a12

    2019 doi

  56. [64]

    2005, ApJ, 620, 984, doi: 10.1086/427086

    Itoh, Y., Hayashi, M., Tamura, M., et al. 2005, ApJ, 620, 984, doi: 10.1086/427086

    2005 doi

  57. [65]

    L., & Wardle, M

    Keith, S. L., & Wardle, M. 2014, MNRAS, 440, 89, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu245

    2014 doi

  58. [66]

    2018, A&A, 617, A44, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201832957

    Keppler, M., Benisty, M., M¨ uller, A., et al. 2018, A&A, 617, A44, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201832957

    2018 doi

  59. [67]

    M., Murray-Clay, R

    Kratter, K. M., Murray-Clay, R. A., & Youdin, A. N. 2010, ApJ, 710, 1375, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/710/2/1375

    2010 doi

  60. [68]

    2011, AJ, 141, 119, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/141/4/119

    Kuzuhara, M., Tamura, M., Ishii, M., et al. 2011, AJ, 141, 119, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/141/4/119

    2011 doi

  61. [69]

    2015, ApJ, 802, 61, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/802/1/61

    Lachapelle, F.-R., Lafreni` ere, D., Gagn´ e, J., et al. 2015, ApJ, 802, 61, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/802/1/61

    2015 doi

  62. [70]

    2012, A&A, 544, A32, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219127

    Lambrechts, M., & Johansen, A. 2012, A&A, 544, A32, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219127

    2012 doi

  63. [71]

    M., Lattanzi, M

    Lasker, B. M., Lattanzi, M. G., McLean, B. J., et al. 2008, AJ, 136, 735, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/136/2/735

    2008 doi

  64. [72]

    M., Long, F., et al

    Li, J., Close, L. M., Long, F., et al. 2025, ApJL, 990, L70, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adfcbd 20

    2025 doi

  65. [73]

    B., Wootten, A., & Wilking, B

    Loren, R. B., Wootten, A., & Wilking, B. A. 1990, ApJ, 365, 269, doi: 10.1086/169480

    1990 doi

  66. [74]

    L., & Rieke, G

    Luhman, K. L., & Rieke, G. H. 1999, ApJ, 525, 440, doi: 10.1086/307891

    1999 doi

  67. [75]

    2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 935, 56, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7ddf

    Suetsugu, R. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 935, 56, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7ddf

    2022 doi

  68. [76]

    2024, in WFC3 Instrument Handbook for Cycle 33 v

    Marinelli, M., & Green, J. 2024, in WFC3 Instrument Handbook for Cycle 33 v. 17, Vol. 17, 17

    2024

  69. [77]

    2022, A&A, 657, A38, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202037494

    Marleau, G.-D., Aoyama, Y., Kuiper, R., et al. 2022, A&A, 657, A38, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202037494

    2022 doi

  70. [78]

    S., Fortney, J

    Marley, M. S., Fortney, J. J., Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., & Lissauer, J. J. 2007, ApJ, 655, 541, doi: 10.1086/509759

    2007 doi

  71. [79]

    Marocco, F., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Fowler, J. W., et al. 2021, ApJS, 253, 8, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abd805

    2021 doi

  72. [80]

    2007, ApJL, 654, L151, doi: 10.1086/511071

    Marois, C., Macintosh, B., & Barman, T. 2007, ApJL, 654, L151, doi: 10.1086/511071

    2007 doi

  73. [81]

    A., Plavchan, P., Kirkpatrick, J

    Marsh, K. A., Plavchan, P., Kirkpatrick, J. D., et al. 2010, ApJ, 719, 550, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/719/1/550

    2010 doi

  74. [82]

    A., & Kraus, A

    Martinez, R. A., & Kraus, A. L. 2022, AJ, 163, 36, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac3745

    2022 doi

  75. [83]

    H., & Teller, E

    Teller, A. H., & Teller, E. 1953, JChPh, 21, 1087, doi: 10.1063/1.1699114 M¨ uller, A., Keppler, M., Henning, T., et al. 2018, A&A, 617, L2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833584

    1953 doi

  76. [84]

    2005, ApJ, 625, 906, doi: 10.1086/429483

    Calvet, N. 2005, ApJ, 625, 906, doi: 10.1086/429483

    2005 doi

  77. [85]

    2004, A&A, 424, 603, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20040356 Neuh¨ auser, R., Guenther, E

    Natta, A., Testi, L., Muzerolle, J., et al. 2004, A&A, 424, 603, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20040356 Neuh¨ auser, R., Guenther, E. W., Wuchterl, G., et al. 2005, A&A, 435, L13, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200500104

    2004 doi

  78. [86]

    Offner, S. S. R., Moe, M., Kratter, K. M., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka, Y. Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 275, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2203.10066

    2023 doi arXiv

  79. [87]

    Papaloizou, J. C. B., & Terquem, C. 1999, ApJ, 521, 823, doi: 10.1086/307581

    1999 doi

  80. [88]

    M., et al

    Patapis, P., Morales-Calder´ on, M., Arabhavi, A. M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.08961, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.08961

    2025 doi

  81. [89]

    A., Kraus, A

    Pearce, L. A., Kraus, A. L., Dupuy, T. J., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 71, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aafacb

    2019 doi

  82. [90]

    J., & Mamajek, E

    Pecaut, M. J., & Mamajek, E. E. 2013, ApJS, 208, 9, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/9 —. 2016, MNRAS, 461, 794, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1300

    2013 doi

  83. [91]

    W., Tremblin, P., Baraffe, I., et al

    Phillips, M. W., Tremblin, P., Baraffe, I., et al. 2020, A&A, 637, A38, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937381

    2020 doi

  84. [92]

    V., Espaillat, C

    Pittman, C. V., Espaillat, C. C., Robinson, C. E., et al. 2025, ApJ, 992, 134, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adef35

    2025 doi

  85. [93]

    B., Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., et al

    Pollack, J. B., Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., et al. 1996, Icarus, 124, 62, doi: 10.1006/icar.1996.0190

    1996 doi

  86. [94]

    Rafikov, R. R. 2006, ApJ, 648, 666, doi: 10.1086/505695

    2006 doi

  87. [95]

    A., Henry, T

    Raghavan, D., McAlister, H. A., Henry, T. J., et al. 2010, ApJS, 190, 1, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/190/1/1 Ratzenb¨ ock, S., Großschedl, J. E., M¨ oller, T., et al. 2023, A&A, 677, A59, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243690

    2010 doi

  88. [96]

    H., & Lebofsky, M

    Rieke, G. H., & Lebofsky, M. J. 1985, ApJ, 288, 618, doi: 10.1086/162827

    1985 doi

  89. [97]

    C., Ireland, M

    Rizzuto, A. C., Ireland, M. J., & Kraus, A. L. 2015, MNRAS, 448, 2737, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv207

    2015 doi

  90. [98]

    E., & Espaillat, C

    Robinson, C. E., & Espaillat, C. C. 2019, ApJ, 874, 129, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0d8d

    2019 doi

  91. [99]

    P., Whitney, B

    Robitaille, T. P., Whitney, B. A., Indebetouw, R., Wood, K., & Denzmore, P. 2006, ApJS, 167, 256, doi: 10.1086/508424

    2006 doi

  92. [100]

    R., Taylor, J

    Roman-Duval, J., Proffitt, C. R., Taylor, J. M., et al. 2020, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 4, 205, doi: 10.3847/2515-5172/abca2f Santamar´ ıa-Miranda, A., C´ aceres, C., Schreiber, M. R., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 475, 2994, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx3325 —. 2019...

    2020 doi

  93. [101]

    2023, AJ, 165, 196, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/acc65d

    Scholz, A., Muzic, K., Jayawardhana, R., Almendros-Abad, V., & Wilson, I. 2023, AJ, 165, 196, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/acc65d

    2023 doi

  94. [102]

    Seifahrt, A., Neuh¨ auser, R., & Hauschildt, P. H. 2007, A&A, 463, 309, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066463

    2007 doi

  95. [103]

    R., Longmore, A

    Simon, M., Howell, R. R., Longmore, A. J., et al. 1987, ApJ, 320, 344, doi: 10.1086/165548

    1987 doi

  96. [104]

    Stamatellos, D., & Herczeg, G. J. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 3432, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv526

    2015 doi

  97. [105]

    Stamatellos, D., & Whitworth, A. P. 2009, MNRAS, 392, 413, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14069.x

    2009 doi

  98. [106]

    Stassun, K. G. 2019, VizieR Online Data Catalog: TESS Input Catalog - v8.0 (TIC-8) (Stassun+, 2019), VizieR On-line Data Catalog: IV/38. Originally published in: 2019AJ....158..138S

    2019

  99. [107]

    P., Todorov, K

    Stolker, T., Quanz, S. P., Todorov, K. O., et al. 2020, A&A, 635, A182, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937159 Szul´ agyi, J., Mayer, L., & Quinn, T. 2017, MNRAS, 464, 3158, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2617

    2020 doi

  100. [108]

    A., Basri, G., & Johns, C

    Valenti, J. A., Basri, G., & Johns, C. M. 1993, AJ, 106, 2024, doi: 10.1086/116783 van Capelleveen, R. F., Ginski, C., Kenworthy, M. A., et al. 2025, ApJL, 990, L8, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adf721

    1993 doi

  101. [109]

    R., & Ford, E

    Veras, D., Crepp, J. R., & Ford, E. B. 2009, ApJ, 696, 1600, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/696/2/1600 21

    2009 doi

  102. [110]

    B., Close, L

    Wagner, K., Follete, K. B., Close, L. M., et al. 2018, ApJL, 863, L8, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aad695

    2018 doi

  103. [111]

    W., et al

    Wahhaj, Z., Cieza, L., Koerner, D. W., et al. 2010, ApJ, 724, 835, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/724/2/835

    2010 doi

  104. [112]

    J., Vigan, A., Lacour, S., et al

    Wang, J. J., Vigan, A., Lacour, S., et al. 2021, AJ, 161, 148, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abdb2d

    2021 doi

  105. [113]

    C., Lopez, S., et al

    Wendeborn, J., Espaillat, C. C., Lopez, S., et al. 2024, ApJ, 970, 118, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4a62

    2024 doi

  106. [114]

    A., Gagn´ e, M., & Allen, L

    Wilking, B. A., Gagn´ e, M., & Allen, L. E. 2008, in Handbook of Star Forming Regions, Volume II, ed. B. Reipurth, Vol. 5, 351, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.0811.0005

    2008 doi arXiv

  107. [115]

    A., Meyer, M

    Wilking, B. A., Meyer, M. R., Robinson, J. G., & Greene, T. P. 2005, AJ, 130, 1733, doi: 10.1086/432758

    2005 doi

  108. [116]

    G., M´ enard, F., Caceres, C., et al

    Wolff, S. G., M´ enard, F., Caceres, C., et al. 2017, AJ, 154, 26, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa74cd

    2017 doi

  109. [117]

    M., Males, J

    Wu, Y.-L., Close, L. M., Males, J. R., et al. 2015, ApJL, 807, L13, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/807/1/L13

    2015 doi

  110. [118]

    P., Sheehan, P

    Wu, Y.-L., Bowler, B. P., Sheehan, P. D., et al. 2020, AJ, 159, 229, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab818c —. 2022, ApJL, 930, L3, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac6420

    2020 doi

  111. [119]

    W., Hsu, C.-C., Finnerty, L., et al

    Xuan, J. W., Hsu, C.-C., Finnerty, L., et al. 2024, ApJ, 970, 71, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4796

    2024 doi

  112. [120]

    Cruz, K. L. 2014, ApJL, 783, L17, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/783/1/L17

    2014 doi

  113. [121]

    P., Wagner, K

    Zhou, Y., Bowler, B. P., Wagner, K. R., et al. 2021, AJ, 161, 244, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abeb7a

    2021 doi

  114. [122]

    P., Yang, H., et al

    Zhou, Y., Bowler, B. P., Yang, H., et al. 2023, AJ, 166, 220, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/acf9ec

    2023 doi

  115. [123]

    P., Sanghi, A., et al

    Zhou, Y., Bowler, B. P., Sanghi, A., et al. 2025, ApJL, 980, L39, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adb134

    2025 doi

  116. [124]

    2015, ApJ, 799, 16, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/799/1/16

    Zhu, Z. 2015, ApJ, 799, 16, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/799/1/16

    2015 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed June 27, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.