Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Scale-separated AdS3 flux vacua arise as the near-horizon region of a smeared D1-D5-KK5 brane intersection.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-12 14:04 UTC pith:ZUNZGZCH

load-bearing objection Solid, explicit 10D construction that embeds the known IIB G2 AdS3 vacua into a D1-D5-KK5 domain wall; the geometry checks out, the KK-decoupling caveat is already owned by the authors. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2606.14469 v2 pith:ZUNZGZCH submitted 2026-06-12 hep-th

On the branes behind scale-separated AdS₃ flux vacua

\'Alvaro Arboleya , Adolfo Guarino , Clara Rold\'an-Dom\'inguez , Giuseppe Sudano This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords scale separationAdS3 flux vacuatype IIB orientifoldsG2-structureD1-D5-KK5 intersectionflux backtrackingtadpole cancellationScherk-Schwarz reductions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper asks where certain supersymmetric, scale-separated AdS3 solutions of type IIB string theory come from in ten dimensions. The solutions arise from orientifold reductions on seven-manifolds with G2-structure; some of their fluxes are free of tadpole constraints and control the hierarchy between the AdS radius and the internal size. By combining three-dimensional supergravity with uplift formulae, the authors reconstruct a singular type IIB background that those free fluxes would probe. Restoring the associated D1- and D5-branes produces an interpolating solution whose near-horizon limit is the AdS3 vacuum. Working entirely in ten dimensions, they then write an explicit codimension-one D1-D5-KK5 intersection (with harmonic functions for the free branes and non-harmonic functions for the tadpole-generating ones) whose near-horizon geometry realises the same vacua while the asymptotic region is locally Riemann-flat. The result supplies a higher-dimensional, smeared-brane origin for these rare scale-separated solutions and shows how their unrestricted fluxes sit outside the Bianchi identities at the horizon.

Core claim

The supersymmetric scale-separated AdS3 imes M7 flux vacua of type IIB G2-orientifold reductions are realised as the near-horizon region of a codimension-one D1-D5-KK5 intersection; the same vacua are recovered by flux-backtracking the unrestricted F(7) and F(3) fluxes from the three-dimensional superpotential and restoring the corresponding D1- and D5-branes.

What carries the argument

The codimension-one D1-D5-KK5 domain-wall Ansatz whose harmonic and non-harmonic functions encode the unrestricted versus tadpole-constrained branes; its near-horizon limit yields constant fluxes supporting AdS3 while the asymptotic region is locally flat.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that the solutions are genuinely scale-separated rests on the Kaluza-Klein modes decoupling, which the paper itself notes has not yet been proven by a full spectral analysis on the nilmanifolds.

What would settle it

Compute the complete Kaluza-Klein spectrum on the seven-dimensional nilmanifold (or solvmanifold) used for the AdS3 vacua; if a tower of modes remains at the AdS scale rather than decoupling, the effective three-dimensional description and the scale-separation claim fail.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Unrestricted fluxes that control scale separation correspond to localised D1 and D5(1,2,3) branes that do not source ten-dimensional Bianchi identities at the horizon.
  • Tadpole-generating D5s must be described by non-harmonic functions and appear as smeared sources in the Bianchi identities.
  • The same construction recovers continuous families of AdS3 solutions with unstabilised moduli as well as fully stabilised ones.
  • Asymptotic regions of the full intersection are locally Riemann-flat, furnishing a geometric boundary condition for the flux vacua.
  • Low-lying operator dimensions in some examples avoid extremal cubic couplings, satisfying a holographic consistency constraint.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If localised (unsmeared) O5-plane solutions can be constructed, the same near-horizon logic would give a fully localised higher-dimensional origin for the vacua.
  • The interpolating solution of Section 3.3 offers a concrete setting in which to test whether the D1-D5 sector can decouple from gravity, a necessary condition for a standard holographic CFT dual.
  • The T-dual massless and massive IIA descriptions suggest that analogous domain-wall intersections should exist for the related scale-separated AdS3 vacua in type IIA.
  • Failure of KK decoupling on the nilmanifold would leave the three-dimensional supergravity as a consistent truncation but not an effective field theory, reopening the Swampland status of these solutions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a higher-dimensional brane interpretation for a class of supersymmetric, scale-separated AdS_{3} flux vacua arising in type IIB orientifold reductions on co-closed G_{2}-structure manifolds. Using the consistent 3D N=1 supergravity (with real superpotential (2.13)) and uplift formulae, the authors first backtrack the unrestricted F_{(7)} and F_{(3)} fluxes (f_{7}, f_{31}, f_{32}, f_{33}) that control scale separation, recovering a singular type IIB background probed by the corresponding D1- and D5_{(1,2,3)}-branes. Restoring those branes yields an interpolating 10D solution connecting the background (asymptotically) to the AdS_{3} imes M_{7} vacua (near-horizon). Working directly in 10D, they then build a codimension-one D1–D5–KK5 intersection (metric (4.1), dilaton (4.3), fluxes (4.4)–(4.5)) whose harmonic H-functions for the unrestricted branes and non-harmonic H-functions for the remaining D5s produce constant fluxes and metric fluxes at the horizon that precisely match the known AdS_{3} solutions (2.15)–(2.16), while the asymptotic region is locally Riemann-flat. Three explicit families (KK5_{(1)}, KK5_{(2)}, and mixed) are worked out in detail and shown to satisfy the type IIB equations of motion and Bianchi identities of Appendix A.

Significance. If the constructions hold, the work supplies a concrete geometric origin for a rare class of scale-separated AdS_{3} vacua in terms of (smeared) intersecting branes and monopoles, thereby linking the 3D effective description to a full 10D domain-wall solution. The explicit matching of moduli VEVs, vacuum energies, AdS radii via (3.23), and the recovery of both the flux-backtracked background and the interpolating solution as partial limits of the same D1–D5–KK5 system constitute a non-trivial consistency check. The three families also illustrate T-dual type IIA realisations (massless and massive) and a genuine type IIB case without geometric dual, and they furnish low-lying operator dimensions that in two of the three examples evade the extremal cubic-coupling obstruction of [27]. These results strengthen the higher-dimensional pedigree of the vacua and open a route to studying possible CFT_{2} duals or localisation of the sources.

major comments (2)
  1. Section 2.1.2 (and footnote 1) correctly flags that a full Kaluza–Klein spectral analysis on the nilmanifolds (4.23) and (4.34) is still missing; the anisotropic radius scalings (2.30)–(2.31) are only a proxy. Because the title and abstract present the vacua as scale-separated, and because the 3D supergravity is used both to generate the solutions and to interpret them as an effective theory, the manuscript should either (i) supply at least a partial spectrum for the lowest-lying modes of the nilmanifold Laplacian or (ii) rephrase the scale-separation claim more cautiously as “candidate scale separation under the assumption of KK decoupling.” The geometric recovery of the flux vacua themselves is independent of this issue, but the EFT interpretation is not.
  2. Section 4 (especially the paragraph after (4.5) and the discussion around (4.20)): the non-harmonic H-functions for the D5_{(4–7)} branes are chosen by hand so that metric fluxes remain constant and the near-horizon fluxes match (2.15)–(2.16). While the authors note that other choices produce different smearings, it is not shown that every admissible choice yields a solution that remains regular (or at least free of new singularities) between the asymptotic and near-horizon regions. A short argument or an additional explicit example demonstrating that the EOMs continue to hold for a modest deformation of the powers a_{4} au a_{7} would make the construction more robust.
minor comments (4)
  1. Figure 1 is useful but the LaTeX-rendered labels are hard to read in the compiled PDF; a cleaner vector version with larger fonts would help.
  2. Appendix B.2: the free parameter κ that parametrises the unstabilised moduli appears in the charges and in the DW_{3} coefficients (B.12)–(B.13); a one-sentence remark on how it is fixed (or left free) when matching the AdS radius (3.23) would avoid confusion.
  3. Notation: the same symbol ω is used both for the common metric-flux value in the three examples and for the structure constants; a brief reminder at the beginning of each subsection would improve readability.
  4. References [27] and [28] on the holographic cubic-coupling constraint are cited; it would be helpful to state explicitly in the introduction or in §5 which of the three families pass the test and which do not (the spectra are already given in (5.1)–(5.3)).

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Minor self-citation of the target AdS3 vacua from overlapping-author papers; the new 10D constructions and EOM checks are independent matching, not circular.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Sec. 1 (Introduction) and Sec. 2.1.2]
    "This work continues investigating the class of scale-separated type IIB AdS3 flux vacua in [11, 12, 13]. ... Specific examples belonging to the general class of supersymmetric AdS3 flux vacua in (2.15)-(2.16) have already appeared in the literature [12, 13]."

    The entire analysis takes the existence and properties of the AdS3 imes M7 vacua (moduli VEVs, vacuum energy, scale-separation scalings) as given by prior papers with overlapping authors; the new 10D constructions are then engineered to recover precisely those vacua in the near-horizon limit. The self-citation supplies the target rather than an independent external benchmark, but it is not load-bearing for the EOM satisfaction or the interpolating/asymptotic properties of the new solutions.

full rationale

The paper takes the supersymmetric scale-separated AdS3 flux vacua of eqs. (2.15)–(2.16) as given from prior work (chiefly [11,12,13] by overlapping authors) and constructs new 10D type-IIB solutions (flux-backtracked DW3 uplift in Sec. 3; full codimension-one D1-D5-KK5 intersection with H-functions in Sec. 4) whose near-horizon limits recover those vacua while the asymptotic region is locally Riemann-flat. The H-functions (harmonic for unrestricted D1/D5(1,2,3), non-harmonic for the rest) and constant metric fluxes via (4.2) are chosen by the standard requirement that fluxes become constant at the horizon and that the 10D EOMs/Bianchi identities of App. A hold; this is matching by construction, not a self-definitional loop or a fitted parameter re-labeled as prediction. No uniqueness theorem is imported, no ansatz is smuggled via citation, and no empirical pattern is renamed. The only mild self-citation is the existence of the target vacua themselves; the geometric recovery and EOM verification stand independently. Score 1 reflects that single non-load-bearing self-citation of the input vacua.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard bosonic equations of type IIB supergravity (including smeared O-plane/D-brane sources), the existence of a consistent 3D N=1 truncation on co-closed G2-structure manifolds, the harmonic-superposition principle for intersecting branes, and the technical choice that metric fluxes remain constant along the transverse direction. No new particles or forces are postulated; free parameters are the usual quantized fluxes and the scaling exponents that realize weak coupling and scale separation.

free parameters (2)
  • unrestricted flux quanta (f7, f31, f32, f33) and scaling exponents (a_i, b, c)
    Chosen large and with a/7 < b < a (or a+c) to achieve parametric weak coupling, large volume and L7/L3 o 0; they are free because they do not enter tadpole conditions.
  • scaling powers a4…a7, b1,b3 and constants ca,ci of the non-harmonic H-functions
    Fixed by hand so that metric fluxes stay constant and the near-horizon geometry is AdS3 imes M7; different choices produce different smearings.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Type IIB supergravity equations of motion and Bianchi identities with smeared O5/D5 and O1/D1 sources (Appendix A) are the correct low-energy description.
    Standard in the flux-compactification literature; higher-derivative or stringy corrections are neglected.
  • domain assumption The Scherk-Schwarz reduction on the given solvmanifold/nilmanifold yields a consistent truncation whose AdS3 critical points lift to 10D solutions.
    Used throughout Sections 2–3; consistency of the truncation is assumed from prior work.
  • ad hoc to paper Metric fluxes ω a, ω i are independent of the overall transverse coordinate (dω = 0).
    Imposed in Section 2.2.2 so that no domain-wall KK5 sources appear in the 10D EOMs; simplifies the construction.
  • domain assumption Smeared (non-localized) sources for the tadpole-related D5-branes are acceptable for the purpose of realizing the near-horizon AdS3 geometry.
    Common technical assumption; the paper acknowledges that fully localized solutions remain open.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 46265 in / 3103 out tokens · 33230 ms · 2026-07-12T14:04:51.129771+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate the brane origin of supersymmetric and scale-separated AdS$_3$ flux vacua arising in a class of type IIB orientifold reductions with G$_2$-structure. First, using the effective three-dimensional supergravity together with explicit uplift formulae, we trace back the $F_{(7)}$ and $F_{(3)}$ fluxes responsible for scale separation and identify the type IIB background that is probed by the corresponding D1- and D5-branes. Second, by restoring such D1- and D5-branes, we obtain a type IIB solution that interpolates between the previous background in the asymptotic region and the scale-separated AdS$_3$ flux vacua in the near-horizon region. Third, by working directly in ten dimensions, we construct a codimension-one D1-D5-KK5 intersection whose near-horizon region realises the scale-separated AdS$_3$ flux vacua. Our results provide a higher-dimensional interpretation of these flux vacua in terms of (smeared) brane configurations.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. $\mathcal{N}=1$ spectra, cubic couplings and the rigid fate of DGKT

    hep-th 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    DGKT vacua satisfy the holographic cubic coupling constraint if and only if the Calabi-Yau threefold is rigid (h^{2,1}=0).

  2. A note on the holographic consistency of DGKT-type vacua with $h^{2,1}=0$

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Cancellations that satisfy a holographic three-point function constraint in DGKT vacua persist across examples with h^{2,1}=0 and more complicated triple-intersection numbers.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 47 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    J. M. Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231–252, [hep-th/9711200]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  2. [2]

    Aharony, O

    O. Aharony, O. Bergman, D. L. Jafferis and J. Maldacena,N=6 superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals,JHEP10(2008) 091, [0806.1218]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  3. [3]

    Guarino, D

    A. Guarino, D. L. Jafferis and O. Varela,String Theory Origin of Dyonic N=8 Supergravity and Its Chern-Simons Duals,Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015) 091601, [1504.08009]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  4. [4]

    Bedroya and P

    A. Bedroya and P. J. Steinhardt,Holography vs. Scale Separation,2509.25313

    arXiv

  5. [5]

    Aharony, Y

    O. Aharony, Y. E. Antebi and M. Berkooz,On the Conformal Field Theory Duals of type IIA AdS(4) Flux Compactifications,JHEP02(2008) 093, [0801.3326]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  6. [6]

    DeWolfe, A

    O. DeWolfe, A. Giryavets, S. Kachru and W. Taylor,Type IIA moduli stabilization, JHEP07(2005) 066, [hep-th/0505160]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  7. [7]

    P. G. Camara, A. Font and L. E. Ibanez,Fluxes, moduli fixing and MSSM-like vacua in a simple IIA orientifold,JHEP09(2005) 013, [hep-th/0506066]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  8. [8]

    Farakos, G

    F. Farakos, G. Tringas and T. Van Riet,No-scale and scale-separated flux vacua from IIA on G2 orientifolds,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 659, [2005.05246]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  9. [9]

    Farakos, M

    F. Farakos, M. Morittu and G. Tringas,On/off scale separation,JHEP10(2023) 067, [2304.14372]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    Farakos and M

    F. Farakos and M. Morittu,Scale-separated AdS 3×S1 vacua from IIA orientifolds,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 98, [2311.08991]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  11. [11]

    Arboleya, A

    ´A. Arboleya, A. Guarino and M. Morittu,Type II orientifold flux vacua in 3D,JHEP 12(2024) 087, [2408.01403]

    arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    Van Hemelryck,Supersymmetric scale-separated AdS 3 orientifold vacua of type IIB, JHEP10(2025) 109, [2502.04791]

    V. Van Hemelryck,Supersymmetric scale-separated AdS 3 orientifold vacua of type IIB, JHEP10(2025) 109, [2502.04791]. 34

    arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Arboleya, A

    ´A. Arboleya, A. Guarino and M. Morittu,On type IIB AdS 3 flux vacua with scale separation and integer conformal dimensions, in24th Hellenic School and Workshops on Elementary Particle Physics and Gravity, 4, 2025.2504.21508

    arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Emelin, F

    M. Emelin, F. Farakos and G. Tringas,Three-dimensional flux vacua from IIB on co-calibrated G2 orientifolds,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 456, [2103.03282]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  15. [15]

    Z. Miao, M. Rajaguru, G. Tringas and T. Wrase,T-dualities and scale-separated AdS 3 in type I,2509.12801

    arXiv

  16. [16]

    Farakos and G

    F. Farakos and G. Tringas,Integer dual dimensions in scale-separated AdS 3 from massive IIA,JHEP06(2025) 130, [2502.08215]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Tringas and T

    G. Tringas and T. Wrase,Classical scale-separated AdS 3 vacua in heterotic string theory,2511.07781

    arXiv

  18. [18]

    Aikot, Z

    A. Aikot, Z. Miao, G. Tringas and T. Wrase,G 2 flux compactifications,2605.06800

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  19. [19]

    Apers, M

    F. Apers, M. Montero, T. Van Riet and T. Wrase,Comments on classical AdS flux vacua with scale separation,JHEP05(2022) 167, [2202.00682]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    Palti and N

    E. Palti and N. Petri,A positive metric over DGKT vacua,JHEP06(2024) 019, [2405.01084]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Buratti, J

    G. Buratti, J. Calderon, A. Mininno and A. M. Uranga,Discrete Symmetries, Weak Coupling Conjecture and Scale Separation in AdS Vacua,JHEP06(2020) 083, [2003.09740]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  22. [22]

    L¨ ust, E

    D. L¨ ust, E. Palti and C. Vafa,AdS and the Swampland,Phys. Lett. B797(2019) 134867, [1906.05225]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  23. [23]

    Arboleya, G

    ´A. Arboleya, G. Casagrande, A. Guarino and M. Morittu,Taxonomy of type II orientifold flux vacua in 3D,JHEP05(2026) 260, [2512.13433]

    arXiv 2026

  24. [24]

    Danielsson and G

    U. Danielsson and G. Dibitetto,Fate of stringy AdS vacua and the weak gravity conjecture,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 026020, [1611.01395]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  25. [25]

    Ooguri and C

    H. Ooguri and C. Vafa,Non-supersymmetric AdS and the Swampland,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.21(2017) 1787–1801, [1610.01533]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  26. [26]

    Arboleya, A

    ´A. Arboleya, A. Guarino, M. Morittu and G. Sudano,Open strings in type IIB AdS 3 flux vacua,JHEP02(2026) 068, [2507.18529]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  27. [27]

    Bobev, H

    N. Bobev, H. Paul and F. Revello,Holographic Constraint on Scale Separation,Phys. Rev. Lett.136(2026) 181601, [2512.11031]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  28. [28]

    Revello and V

    F. Revello and V. Van Hemelryck,Broken and restored: a holographic constraint for AdS vacua with orbifolds,2605.07464

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [29]

    Revello and F

    F. Revello and F. Verbeure,A note on the holographic consistency of DGKT-type vacua withh 2,1 = 0,2606.30341

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [30]

    Revello and V

    F. Revello and V. Van Hemelryck,N= 1spectra, cubic couplings and the rigid fate of DGKT,2607.00789

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    Apers, M

    F. Apers, M. Montero and I. Valenzuela,Backtracking AdS flux vacua,JHEP03(2026) 161, [2506.03314]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  32. [32]

    Apers,On the DGKT brane dual and its decoupling,2601.15093

    F. Apers,On the DGKT brane dual and its decoupling,2601.15093

    arXiv

  33. [33]

    Kounnas, D

    C. Kounnas, D. Lust, P. M. Petropoulos and D. Tsimpis,AdS4 flux vacua in type II superstrings and their domain-wall solutions,JHEP09(2007) 051, [0707.4270]. 35

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  34. [34]

    Derendinger, C

    J.-P. Derendinger, C. Kounnas, P. M. Petropoulos and F. Zwirner,Superpotentials in IIA compactifications with general fluxes,Nucl.Phys.B715(2005) 211–233, [hep-th/0411276]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  35. [35]

    Villadoro and F

    G. Villadoro and F. Zwirner,N=1 effective potential from dual type-IIA D6/O6 orientifolds with general fluxes,JHEP0506(2005) 047, [hep-th/0503169]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  36. [36]

    Tringas and T

    G. Tringas and T. Wrase,Scale separation from O-planes,JHEP08(2025) 073, [2504.15436]

    arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Gong,Classification of Nilpotent Lie Algebras of Dimension 7 (Over Algebraically Closed Fields andR)

    M.-P. Gong,Classification of Nilpotent Lie Algebras of Dimension 7 (Over Algebraically Closed Fields andR). PhD thesis, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 1998

    1998

  38. [38]

    J. P. Conlon, S. Ning and F. Revello,Exploring the holographic Swampland,JHEP04 (2022) 117, [2110.06245]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    Apers, J

    F. Apers, J. P. Conlon, S. Ning and F. Revello,Integer conformal dimensions for type IIa flux vacua,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 106029, [2202.09330]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  40. [40]

    J. D. Brown and M. Henneaux,Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity,Commun. Math. Phys.104(1986) 207–226

    1986

  41. [41]

    Strominger and C

    A. Strominger and C. Vafa,Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, Phys. Lett. B379(1996) 99–104, [hep-th/9601029]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  42. [42]

    Villadoro and F

    G. Villadoro and F. Zwirner,Beyond Twisted Tori,Phys.Lett.B652(2007) 118–123, [0706.3049]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  43. [43]

    Scherk and J

    J. Scherk and J. H. Schwarz,How to Get Masses from Extra Dimensions,Nucl.Phys. B153(1979) 61–88

    1979

  44. [44]

    Derendinger and A

    J.-P. Derendinger and A. Guarino,A second look at gauged supergravities from fluxes in M-theory,JHEP1409(2014) 162, [1406.6930]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  45. [45]

    Danielsson, G

    U. Danielsson, G. Dibitetto and A. Guarino,KK-monopoles and G-structures in M-theory/type IIA reductions,JHEP02(2015) 096, [1411.0575]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  46. [46]

    Skenderis and P

    K. Skenderis and P. K. Townsend,Gravitational stability and renormalization group flow,Phys. Lett. B468(1999) 46–51, [hep-th/9909070]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  47. [47]

    A. A. Tseytlin,Harmonic superpositions of M-branes,Nucl. Phys. B475(1996) 149–163, [hep-th/9604035]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  48. [48]

    Andriot, G

    D. Andriot, G. Cacciapaglia, A. Deandrea, N. Deutschmann and D. Tsimpis,Towards Kaluza-Klein Dark Matter on Nilmanifolds,JHEP06(2016) 169, [1603.02289]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  49. [49]

    Andriot and D

    D. Andriot and D. Tsimpis,Laplacian spectrum on a nilmanifold, truncations and effective theories,JHEP09(2018) 096, [1806.05156]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  50. [50]

    Shelton, W

    J. Shelton, W. Taylor and B. Wecht,Nongeometric flux compactifications,JHEP0510 (2005) 085, [hep-th/0508133]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  51. [51]

    Junghans,O-Plane Backreaction and Scale Separation in Type IIA Flux Vacua, Fortsch

    D. Junghans,O-Plane Backreaction and Scale Separation in Type IIA Flux Vacua, Fortsch. Phys.68(2020) 2000040, [2003.06274]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  52. [52]

    Junghans,A note on O6 intersections in AdS flux vacua,JHEP02(2024) 126, [2310.17695]

    D. Junghans,A note on O6 intersections in AdS flux vacua,JHEP02(2024) 126, [2310.17695]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    Emelin, F

    M. Emelin, F. Farakos and G. Tringas,O6-plane backreaction on scale-separated Type IIA AdS3 vacua,JHEP07(2022) 133, [2202.13431]. 36

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  54. [54]

    Emelin,Consistency conditions for O-plane unsmearing from second-order perturbation theory,JHEP12(2024) 025, [2407.12717]

    M. Emelin,Consistency conditions for O-plane unsmearing from second-order perturbation theory,JHEP12(2024) 025, [2407.12717]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  55. [55]

    Bergshoeff, R

    E. Bergshoeff, R. Kallosh, T. Ortin, D. Roest and A. Van Proeyen,New formulations of D = 10 supersymmetry and D8 - O8 domain walls,Class. Quant. Grav.18(2001) 3359–3382, [hep-th/0103233]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  56. [56]

    R. C. Myers,Dielectric branes,JHEP12(1999) 022, [hep-th/9910053]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  57. [57]

    E. G. Gimon and J. Polchinski,Consistency conditions for orientifolds and D-manifolds,Phys. Rev. D54(1996) 1667–1676, [hep-th/9601038]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  58. [58]

    Giveon and D

    A. Giveon and D. Kutasov,Brane Dynamics and Gauge Theory,Rev. Mod. Phys.71 (1999) 983–1084, [hep-th/9802067]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  59. [59]

    Bergman, E

    O. Bergman, E. G. Gimon and S. Sugimoto,Orientifolds, RR torsion, and K theory, JHEP05(2001) 047, [hep-th/0103183]. 37

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001