Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 2 minor 23 references

The Λ_ωsCDM model adds an early barotropic fluid that raises the Hubble constant to 71.51 km/s/Mpc.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-26 23:55 UTC pith:LNVI5A2M

load-bearing objection The abstract's own numbers contradict the subdominance claim that is supposed to make the model work. the 1 major comments →

arxiv 2606.17749 v1 pith:LNVI5A2M submitted 2026-06-16 astro-ph.CO gr-qc

Alleviating the Hubble tension with the Λ_(ω_s)CDM model

Youri Carloni This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO gr-qc
keywords Hubble tensioncosmological model extensionbarotropic fluidearly universe cosmologyHubble constantMCMC constraintsΛCDM
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes the Λ_ωsCDM extension to standard cosmology by introducing a barotropic fluid component active at early times. The fluid is defined to become subdominant as the universe expands, recovering the usual ΛCDM behavior at late times. Constraints from Planck 2018 CMB data combined with DESI DR2 and Pantheon+SH0ES yield ω_s around 0.294 and a small density parameter, resulting in an increased H0 value. This shift brings the inferred expansion rate closer to local measurements, reducing the Hubble tension.

Core claim

The authors formulate the Λ_ωsCDM model with an additional matter-with-pressure term at early times. MCMC analysis with Planck 2018, DESI DR2, and Pantheon+SH0ES data constrains the barotropic factor to ω_s = 0.294^{+0.014}_{-0.004} and 10^5 Ω_s = 1.62^{+0.36}_{-0.56}. These parameters increase the Hubble constant to H_0 = 71.51^{+0.72}_{-0.74} km/s/Mpc, alleviating the Hubble tension while recovering ΛCDM at late times.

What carries the argument

The barotropic fluid with equation of state parameter ω_s and density Ω_s, which provides an early-time adjustment to the expansion history.

Load-bearing premise

The new fluid must remain subdominant to dust and radiation throughout the later expansion of the universe.

What would settle it

Future data from independent probes showing that the Hubble constant stays near the lower Planck value around 67 km/s/Mpc even after allowing for the extra parameters would contradict the model's ability to raise H0.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The combined dataset is well fit by the two extra parameters.
  • The late-time cosmology matches ΛCDM exactly as the fluid becomes subdominant.
  • The model directly increases the inferred present-day Hubble constant.
  • The Hubble tension is reduced without introducing new late-time physics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the barotropic fluid is real, it may point to new early-universe physics such as modified recombination or dark sector interactions.
  • High-resolution future CMB experiments could detect signatures of this fluid through changes in the acoustic peaks.
  • Similar extensions might be tested against other cosmological tensions like the S8 discrepancy.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces the Λ_{ω_s}CDM extension to ΛCDM, adding a barotropic fluid component with equation-of-state parameter ω_s and normalized density Ω_s that is asserted to remain subdominant to radiation and dust, thereby recovering standard ΛCDM at late times. MCMC constraints are performed on the combined Planck 2018 CMB, DESI DR2, and Pantheon+SH0ES datasets, yielding ω_s = 0.294^{+0.014(0.015)}_{-0.004(0.023)} and 10^5 Ω_s = 1.62^{+0.36(1.02)}_{-0.56(0.91)}, which produce H_0 = 71.51^{+0.72(1.43)}_{-0.74(1.46)} km/s/Mpc and are claimed to alleviate the Hubble tension.

Significance. If internally consistent, the construction would supply a two-parameter early-time modification that raises the inferred Hubble constant when the local distance-ladder data are included. The approach is parametric rather than derived from a first-principles mechanism, and its viability rests entirely on whether the reported best-fit values actually satisfy the subdominance condition stated in the abstract.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central premise that the barotropic fluid 'is subdominant to dust and radiation as the Universe expands, thereby recovering the ΛCDM paradigm at late times' is contradicted by the quoted best-fit parameters. Substituting ω_s = 0.294 and 10^5 Ω_s = 1.62 into the density ratio ρ_s/ρ_r = (Ω_s/Ω_r) × (1+z)^{1-3ω_s}, with Ω_r h^2 ≈ 4.15 × 10^{-5} and h ≈ 0.715, produces ρ_s/ρ_r ≈ 0.46 at z = 1090. This ratio is not ≪ 1, violating the subdominance assumption required for the model to affect only early epochs while leaving late-time cosmology unchanged.
minor comments (2)
  1. No information is supplied on MCMC implementation details, convergence diagnostics (e.g., Gelman-Rubin statistic), or prior ranges for the new parameters ω_s and Ω_s.
  2. The manuscript does not examine consistency with additional observables such as BBN light-element abundances or the CMB damping tail beyond the three datasets used in the fit.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful review and the comment on the subdominance condition. We address the point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central premise that the barotropic fluid 'is subdominant to dust and radiation as the Universe expands, thereby recovering the ΛCDM paradigm at late times' is contradicted by the quoted best-fit parameters. Substituting ω_s = 0.294 and 10^5 Ω_s = 1.62 into the density ratio ρ_s/ρ_r = (Ω_s/Ω_r) × (1+z)^{1-3ω_s}, with Ω_r h^2 ≈ 4.15 × 10^{-5} and h ≈ 0.715, produces ρ_s/ρ_r ≈ 0.46 at z = 1090. This ratio is not ≪ 1, violating the subdominance assumption required for the model to affect only early epochs while leaving late-time cosmology unchanged.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee drawing attention to this consistency check. However, the exponent in the quoted density ratio formula is inverted. The correct scaling follows from ρ ∝ (1+z)^{3(1+w)}, so ρ_s/ρ_r = (Ω_s/Ω_r) × (1+z)^{3(1+ω_s)-4} = (Ω_s/Ω_r) × (1+z)^{3ω_s-1}. With ω_s = 0.294 the exponent is -0.118. Given Ω_r h^2 ≈ 4.15×10^{-5} and h ≈ 0.715, Ω_r ≈ 8.12×10^{-5}, hence Ω_s/Ω_r ≈ 0.1995. At z = 1090, (1+z)^{-0.118} ≈ 0.438, yielding ρ_s/ρ_r ≈ 0.0876 ≪ 1. This confirms subdominance at recombination and is consistent with the abstract. No revision is required. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper introduces a phenomenological extension with two new parameters (ω_s, Ω_s) and reports the outcome of a standard MCMC fit to Planck 2018, DESI DR2, and Pantheon+SH0ES data. The quoted H0 = 71.51 km/s/Mpc is the posterior mean from this fit, presented as the result of constraining the model rather than a first-principles derivation. No equations, uniqueness theorems, or self-citations are invoked that reduce the central claim to its inputs by construction. The model definition (subdominant barotropic fluid recovering ΛCDM at late times) is stated explicitly and tested via the fit; any tension with best-fit values is a consistency question, not a circular reduction. The analysis is self-contained against external data benchmarks with no load-bearing self-referential steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The model rests on two fitted parameters for the new fluid and the domain assumption that this fluid fades at late times; no independent evidence is supplied for the fluid's existence outside the fit.

free parameters (2)
  • ω_s = 0.294
    Barotropic equation-of-state parameter of the new fluid, obtained from MCMC posterior.
  • Ω_s = 1.62e-5
    Present-day density parameter of the new fluid (scaled by 10^5), obtained from MCMC posterior.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The barotropic fluid is subdominant to dust and radiation and the model recovers ΛCDM at late times.
    Explicitly stated in the abstract as the mechanism that preserves standard late-time cosmology.
invented entities (1)
  • matter with pressure barotropic fluid no independent evidence
    purpose: Modify early expansion history to permit higher H0 while remaining subdominant later.
    New component introduced in the model definition; no independent falsifiable signature outside the fit is provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5764 in / 1553 out tokens · 37264 ms · 2026-06-26T23:55:19.626336+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We formulate a novel extension of the $\Lambda$CDM model, named $\Lambda_{\omega_s}$CDM, in which we consider an additional term at early times in order to alleviate the Hubble tension. This additional component, referred to as \emph{matter with pressure}, indicates a barotropic fluid that is subdominant to dust and radiation as the Universe expands, thereby recovering the $\Lambda$CDM paradigm at late times. We constrain the $\Lambda_{\omega_s}$CDM cosmology by performing a Markov Chain Monte Carlo analysis with Planck 2018 CMB, DESI DR2, and Pantheon+\texttt{SH0ES} data. The results suggest that the barotropic factor and the normalized density of the new fluid are given, respectively, by $\omega_s=0.294_{-0.004(0.023)}^{+0.014(0.015)}$ and $10^{5}\Omega_s=1.62_{-0.56(0.91)}^{+0.36(1.02)}$. With these two additional parameters, the Hubble constant is increased to $H_0 = 71.51^{+0.72(1.43)}_{-0.74(1.46)}$ km/s/Mpc, alleviating \emph{de facto} the Hubble tension.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.17749 by Youri Carloni.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Posteriors for the ΛωsCDM and ΛCDM models with respect to the Planck 2018 CMB, DESI DR2, and Pantheon+SH0ES data. We therefore conclude that introducing matter with pressure at early times can alleviate the H0 tension. Specifically, the ΛωsCDM model reduces the tension from 4.1σ to 2.4σ. Furthermore, the mean values of the additional cosmological parameters suggest that the fluid driving the increase in H0… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Evolution of the energy densities in the Λ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

23 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    A. G. Riess et al.,Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant, Astron. J.,116, 1009–1038 (1998)

    1998

  2. [2]

    Perlmutter et al.,Measurements ofΩandΛfrom 42 High Redshift Supernovae, Astrophys

    S. Perlmutter et al.,Measurements ofΩandΛfrom 42 High Redshift Supernovae, Astrophys. J.,517, 565–586 (1999)

    1999

  3. [3]

    P. A. R. Ade et al.,Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters, Astron. As- trophys.,594, A13 (2016)

    2015

  4. [4]

    Aghanim et al.,Planck 2018 results

    N. Aghanim et al.,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astro- phys.,641, A6 (2020)

    2018

  5. [5]

    A. G. Adame et al.,DESI 2024 VI: cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations, JCAP.,02, 021 (2025)

    2024

  6. [6]

    M. A. Karim et al.,DESI DR2 results. II. Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmological constraints, Phys. Rev. D.,112, 083515 (2025)

    2025

  7. [7]

    Luongo, and M

    O. Luongo, and M. MuccinoModel-independent cosmographic constraints from DESI 2024, Astron. Astrophys.,690, A40 (2024)

    2024

  8. [8]

    A. C. Alfano, O. Luongo, and M. MuccinoCosmological constraints from calibrated Ep - E iso gamma-ray burst correlation by using DESI 2024 data release, JCAP,12, 055 (2024)

    2024

  9. [9]

    Carloni, O

    Y. Carloni, O. Luongo, and M. MuccinoDoes dark energy really revive using DESI 2024 data?, Phys. Rev. D,111, 023512 (2025)

    2024

  10. [10]

    A. C. Alfano, O. Luongo, and M. MuccinoDark energy constraints using gamma-ray burst correlations with DESI 2024 data, JHEAp,46, 100348 (2025)

    2024

  11. [11]

    A. C. Alfano, and O. LuongoCosmic distance duality after DESI 2024 data release and dark energy evolution, Phys. Dark Univ.,51, 102205 (2026)

    2024

  12. [12]

    Carloni, O

    Y. Carloni, O. Luongo, and M. Biesiada,Challenging theω0ωaCDM parametrization through rational expansions in view of the DESI DR2, Phys. Rev. D,113, 103525 (2026)

    2026

  13. [13]

    Heymans et al.,KiDS-1000 Cosmology: Multi-probe weak gravitational lensing and spectroscopic galaxy clustering constraints, Astron

    C. Heymans et al.,KiDS-1000 Cosmology: Multi-probe weak gravitational lensing and spectroscopic galaxy clustering constraints, Astron. Astrophys.,646, A140 (2021)

    2021

  14. [14]

    Di Valentino et al.,Snowmass2021 - Letter of interest cosmology intertwined II: The hubble constant tension, Astropart

    E. Di Valentino et al.,Snowmass2021 - Letter of interest cosmology intertwined II: The hubble constant tension, Astropart. Phys.,131, 102605 (2021)

    2021

  15. [15]

    A. G. Riess et al.,A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km s−1Mpc −1 Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team, Astrophys. J. Lett,934, L7 (2022)

    2022

  16. [16]

    Di Valentino,Can interacting dark energy solve theH 0 tension?, Phys

    E. Di Valentino,Can interacting dark energy solve theH 0 tension?, Phys. Rev. D, 96, 043503 (2017)

    2017

  17. [17]

    Di Valentino, A

    E. Di Valentino, A. Melchiorri, O. Mena, and S. Vagnozzi,Nonminimal dark sector physics and cosmological tensions, Phys. Rev. D,101, 063502 (2020)

    2020

  18. [18]

    Poulin, T

    V. Poulin, T. L. Smith, T. Karwal, and M. Kamionkowski,Towards a solution to the H0 tension, Phys. Rev. Lett.,122, 221301 (2019)

    2019

  19. [19]

    de la Macorra, E

    A. de la Macorra, E. Almaraz, and J. Garrido,Towards a solution to the H0 tension, Phys. Rev. D,105, 023526 (2022). Alleviating the Hubble tension with theΛ ωs CDM model7

    2022

  20. [20]

    Raveri,Resolving the Hubble tension at late times with Dark Energy, arXiv[astro- ph.CO]: 2309.06795 (2023)

    M. Raveri,Resolving the Hubble tension at late times with Dark Energy, arXiv[astro- ph.CO]: 2309.06795 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    Tutusaus, M

    I. Tutusaus, M. Kunz, and L. Favre,Solving the Hubble tension at intermediate red- shifts with dynamical dark energy, arXiv[astro-ph.CO]: 2311.16862 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    Carloni, O

    Y. Carloni, O. Luongo, and M. Muccino,Addressing theH 0 tension through matter with pressure and no early dark energy, Astron. Astrophys.,707, A383 (2026)

    2026

  23. [23]

    A barotropic alternative to Early Dark Energy for alleviating the $H_0$ tension

    Y. Carloni, and O. Luongo,A barotropic alternative to Early Dark Energy for allevi- ating theH 0 tension, arXiv[astro-ph.CO]: 2604.18053 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026