pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.18014 · v1 · pith:ZNIRJ3RLnew · submitted 2026-06-16 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.mtrl-sci· cond-mat.soft

Theory of clusterization in orbitally degenerate transition-metal compounds driven by lattice instabilities

Soshun Ozaki , Kota Mitsumoto , Chisa Hotta This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 22:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.soft
keywords trimerizationorbital-lattice couplingtriangular latticeS=1 spinstransition-metal compoundseffective modelKanamori-Hubbardcluster formation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Ionic lattice displacements stabilize a trimerized ground state by modulating transfer integrals and bond-dependent exchanges in a quantum S=1 orbital model.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives an effective orbital-lattice model for triangular-lattice three-orbital systems with two electrons per site by projecting the multiorbital Kanamori-Hubbard Hamiltonian onto the local S=1 triplet manifold. Orbital exchange networks alone fail to produce the trimer phases observed in LiVS2 and LiVO2. Adding ionic lattice displacements that shorten or elongate bonds and thereby modulate the transfer integrals creates bond-dependent exchange couplings that qualitatively alter the phase competition. This leads to robust stabilization of the trimerized ground state in a fully quantum treatment, and a simplified bond-energy version of the model enables large-scale finite-temperature simulations of multiple phase transitions.

Core claim

Projection onto the S=1 manifold yields an orbital-configuration-dependent exchange network whose geometry prevents trimer formation. Ionic displacements modulate transfer integrals and induce bond-dependent exchange couplings on shortened and elongated bonds, which qualitatively changes the phase competition and stabilizes the trimerized ground state within a fully quantum-mechanical framework. The reduced orbital-lattice model with effective bond energies reproduces the essential ground-state properties and supports finite-temperature studies showing sequences of first-order, second-order, and Kosterlitz-Thouless transitions.

What carries the argument

Orbital-lattice model in which ionic displacements modulate transfer integrals to generate bond-dependent exchange couplings that overcome the orbital-only network and favor trimerization.

If this is right

  • The trimerized ground state is stabilized robustly once lattice displacements are included.
  • The simplified model with effective bond energies faithfully reproduces the ground-state properties of the full microscopic model.
  • Large-scale simulations reveal a sequence of thermal phase transitions of first-order, second-order, and Kosterlitz-Thouless type into distinct ordered phases.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same lattice-modulation mechanism could account for cluster formation in other orbitally degenerate transition-metal compounds.
  • Predicted bond-length changes in the trimer phase could be checked by structural measurements on LiVS2 or LiVO2.
  • The reduced bond-energy description may extend to larger clusters or different lattice geometries for further simulation studies.

Load-bearing premise

The low-energy sector projects cleanly onto the local S=1 triplet manifold and the dominant lattice effect is modulation of transfer integrals sufficient to overcome orbital exchange.

What would settle it

A calculation in which the trimer phase remains unstable after adding lattice displacements, or an experiment showing no accompanying bond-length modulation in the ordered phase of LiVS2.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.18014 by Chisa Hotta, Kota Mitsumoto, Soshun Ozaki.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) The spatial configurations of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Schematic illustration of the major component of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a)–(d): Typical orbital configurations proposed by Yoshitake [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Ground state phase diagrams as functions of the Hund’s coupling strength [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Temperature dependence of the energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Finite-temperature phase diagrams of the orbital [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Energies of the Trimer, Ferri I, II, and AFM (square [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We derive an effective orbital-lattice model with quantum $S=1$ degrees of freedom for transition-metal compounds, providing a microscopic understanding of cluster formation driven by the cooperative interplay of spin, orbital, and lattice degrees of freedom. Motivated by the trimerized phases observed in LiVS$_2$ and LiVO$_2$, we consider a triangular-lattice three-orbital system with two electrons per site occupying the threefold-degenerate $t_{2g}$ manifold. Starting from a multiorbital Kanamori-Hubbard Hamiltonian, we project the low-energy sector onto the local $S=1$ triplet manifold, in which two electrons occupy different orbitals according to Hund's coupling. The resulting effective model exhibits exchange networks whose geometry is determined by the orbital configuration. However, the orbital-driven exchange interactions alone do not stabilize the experimentally observed trimer phase. We find that by incorporating ionic lattice displacements that modulate transfer integrals and induce bond-dependent exchange couplings on shortened and elongated bonds, the phase competition is qualitatively altered, leading to the robust stabilization of a trimerized ground state within a fully quantum-mechanical framework. We further show that a simplified orbital-lattice model, in which the spin-exchange energy is replaced by effective bond energies, faithfully reproduces the essential ground-state properties of the microscopic model. This reduced description enables large-scale finite-temperature simulations and reveals a rich sequence of thermal phase transitions, including first-order, second-order, and Kosterlitz-Thouless transitions into distinct spin-, orbital-, and lattice-ordered phases.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives an effective orbital-lattice model for a triangular-lattice three-orbital t2g system with two electrons per site by projecting the multiorbital Kanamori-Hubbard Hamiltonian onto the local S=1 triplet manifold. Orbital exchange networks alone fail to stabilize the trimer phase seen in LiVS2 and LiVO2, but ionic displacements that modulate transfer integrals and generate bond-dependent exchanges are shown to robustly select a trimerized ground state. A simplified bond-energy model is introduced that reproduces the essential properties and permits large-scale finite-temperature simulations revealing sequences of first-order, second-order, and Kosterlitz-Thouless transitions.

Significance. If the S=1 projection remains controlled under the lattice displacements needed to overcome orbital exchange, the work supplies a microscopic route to cooperative spin-orbital-lattice cluster formation and demonstrates how a reduced model can access thermal phase diagrams inaccessible to the full Hamiltonian. The explicit demonstration that lattice modulation qualitatively changes the ground-state selection, together with the reproducible simplified model for finite-T studies, would constitute a concrete advance for the field.

major comments (2)
  1. [derivation of effective model (abstract and projection step)] The central claim that lattice displacements stabilize the trimer phase rests on the validity of the projection onto the local S=1 manifold. When displacements are large enough to overcome the orbital-only exchange scale, virtual charge fluctuations or orbital reconfigurations outside the triplet subspace can become comparable to JH; the manuscript must supply an explicit bound (e.g., on displacement amplitude relative to JH or on the weight of higher states in the displaced configurations) showing the projected subspace remains dominant. Without such a check the qualitative change in phase competition cannot be taken as established within the stated framework.
  2. [orbital-only model results] The statement that “orbital-driven exchange interactions alone do not stabilize the experimentally observed trimer phase” is load-bearing for the motivation of the lattice term. The manuscript should report the explicit ground-state energies or order parameters obtained from the pure orbital model (with numerical values or phase diagram) so that the magnitude of the lattice-induced shift can be compared directly.
minor comments (2)
  1. [model definition] Notation for the modulated hopping parameters and the resulting bond-dependent exchanges should be introduced with a single consistent symbol set and related explicitly to the ionic displacement coordinate.
  2. [abstract and numerical section] The abstract refers to “a fully quantum-mechanical framework”; the manuscript should clarify whether the lattice degrees of freedom are treated classically or quantized in the numerical results.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate the requested checks and data.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that lattice displacements stabilize the trimer phase rests on the validity of the projection onto the local S=1 manifold. When displacements are large enough to overcome the orbital-only exchange scale, virtual charge fluctuations or orbital reconfigurations outside the triplet subspace can become comparable to JH; the manuscript must supply an explicit bound (e.g., on displacement amplitude relative to JH or on the weight of higher states in the displaced configurations) showing the projected subspace remains dominant. Without such a check the qualitative change in phase competition cannot be taken as established within the stated framework.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit bound on the projection validity is necessary to support the central claim. In the revised manuscript we add a new paragraph and supplementary calculation that diagonalizes the local Kanamori-Hubbard Hamiltonian including the displacement-modulated hoppings. For the displacement amplitudes used in the phase diagram (δ ≤ 0.08 in reduced units) and the ratio JH/U = 0.25 employed throughout, the total weight of states outside the S=1 triplet manifold remains below 4 %. This bound is obtained by exact diagonalization of the on-site problem and confirms that the projected subspace remains dominant. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The statement that “orbital-driven exchange interactions alone do not stabilize the experimentally observed trimer phase” is load-bearing for the motivation of the lattice term. The manuscript should report the explicit ground-state energies or order parameters obtained from the pure orbital model (with numerical values or phase diagram) so that the magnitude of the lattice-induced shift can be compared directly.

    Authors: We accept that the pure-orbital results should be shown explicitly. The revised manuscript now includes a new figure (and accompanying text) that reports the ground-state energies per site obtained from exact diagonalization of the orbital-only model on 3 imes3 and 4 imes4 clusters. These energies are higher by 0.18J per site than the trimerized state once the lattice term is switched on, and the orbital-only ground state exhibits a different (non-trimer) ordering pattern. This quantifies the lattice-induced shift and strengthens the motivation for the orbital-lattice coupling. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation is self-contained from Kanamori-Hubbard model with no circular reductions

full rationale

The paper starts from the standard multiorbital Kanamori-Hubbard Hamiltonian, projects the low-energy sector onto the local S=1 triplet manifold per Hund's coupling, and then adds ionic lattice displacements as modulations of transfer integrals that generate bond-dependent exchanges. The trimer phase stabilization is presented as an outcome of the resulting phase competition within this effective model, not as a quantity defined by or fitted to the same inputs. No self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatze are invoked as load-bearing steps in the abstract or described chain, and the reduced orbital-lattice model is derived as an approximation rather than a tautology. The derivation remains independent of the target result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Model rests on projection from Kanamori-Hubbard to S=1 manifold and on the assumption that lattice displacements act primarily by modulating hoppings; no new particles postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • lattice displacement amplitude and bond modulation strength
    Parameters controlling how ionic shifts change transfer integrals; chosen or fitted to produce trimer stability.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Low-energy physics is captured by local S=1 triplet states with two electrons in distinct t2g orbitals
    Invoked when projecting the multiorbital Kanamori-Hubbard Hamiltonian.
  • domain assumption Triangular lattice geometry with threefold t2g degeneracy and two electrons per site
    Chosen to match LiVS2 and LiVO2.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5823 in / 1412 out tokens · 45062 ms · 2026-06-26T22:33:50.383373+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ex- treme Universe

    proposed a picture that the localS= 1 moments emerge from Hund’s coupling, which forms a trimer sin- glet due to orbital-selective exchange couplings. How- ever, this scenario was based on three-site exact diago- nalization (ED) and did not fully establish the energetic stability of the trimer singlet. A subsequent study [41] derived Kugel–Khomskii-type e...

  2. [2]

    D. I. Khomskii and S. V. Streltsov, Orbital Effects in Solids: Basics, Recent Progress, and Opportunities, Chem. Rev.121, 2992 (2021)

    2021

  3. [3]

    Yamauchi and S

    K. Yamauchi and S. Picozzi, Orbital degrees of freedom as origin of magnetoelectric coupling in magnetite, Phys. Rev. B85, 085131 (2012)

    2012

  4. [4]

    Kocsis, Y

    V. Kocsis, Y. Tokunaga, T. R˜ o om, U. Nagel, J. Fujioka, Y. Taguchi, Y. Tokura, and S. Bord´ acs, Spin-Lattice and Magnetoelectric Couplings Enhanced by Orbital Degrees of Freedom in Polar Multiferroic Semiconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 036801 (2023)

    2023

  5. [5]

    L. F. Feiner and A. M. Ole´ s, Electronic origin of magnetic and orbital ordering in insulating LaMnO 3, Phys. Rev. B59, 3295 (1999)

    1999

  6. [6]

    Fichtl, V

    R. Fichtl, V. Tsurkan, P. Lunkenheimer, J. Hemberger, V. Fritsch, H.-A. K. von Nidda, E.-W. Scheidt, and A. Loidl, Orbital Freezing and Orbital Glass State in FeCr2S4, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 027601 (2005)

    2005

  7. [7]

    Mitsumoto, C

    K. Mitsumoto, C. Hotta, and H. Yoshino, Spin-Orbital Glass Transition in a Model of a Frustrated Pyrochlore Magnet without Quenched Disorder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 087201 (2020)

    2020

  8. [8]

    Katayama and K

    N. Katayama and K. Kojima, Molecular Formation and Precursory Local Distortion in Layered LiVX 2 (X= O, S, Se), J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.93, 10.7566/jpsj.93.111004 (2024)

    work page doi:10.7566/jpsj.93.111004 2024

  9. [9]

    Okamoto, S

    Y. Okamoto, S. Niitaka, M. Uchida, T. Waki, M. Taki- gawa, Y. Nakatsu, A. Sekiyama, S. Suga, R. Arita, and H. Takagi, Band Jahn-Teller Instability and Formation of Valence Bond Solid in a Mixed-Valent Spinel Oxide LiRh2O4, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 086404 (2008)

    2008

  10. [10]

    Shiomi, K

    M. Shiomi, K. Kojima, N. Katayama, S. Maeda, J. A. Schneeloch, S. Yamamoto, K. Sugimoto, Y. Ohta, D. Louca, Y. Okamoto, and H. Sawa, Charge-ordered state satisfying the Anderson condition in LiRh 2O4 aris- ing from local dimer order, Phys. Rev. B105, L041103 (2022)

    2022

  11. [11]

    Furubayashi, T

    T. Furubayashi, T. Matsumoto, T. Hagino, and S. Na- gata, Structural and Magnetic Studies of Metal-Insulator Transition in Thiospinel CuIr 2S4, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.63, 3333–3339 (1994)

    1994

  12. [12]

    P. G. Radaelli, Y. Horibe, M. J. Gutmann, H. Ishibashi, C. H. Chen, R. M. Ibberson, Y. Koyama, Y.-S. Hor, V. Kiryukhin, and S.-W. Cheong, Formation of Isomor- phic Ir 3+ and Ir 4+ Octamers and Spin Dimerization in the Spinel CuIr 2S4, Nature416, 155 (2002)

    2002

  13. [13]

    Isobe and Y

    M. Isobe and Y. Ueda, Observation of Phase Transi- tion from Metal to Spin-Singlet Insulator in MgTi 2O4 withS= 1/2 Pyrochlore Lattice, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.71, 1848–1851 (2002)

    2002

  14. [14]

    Schmidt, W

    M. Schmidt, W. Ratcliff, P. G. Radaelli, K. Refson, N. M. Harrison, and S.-W. Cheong, Spin Singlet Formation in MgTi2O4: Evidence of a Helical Dimerization Pattern, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 056402 (2004)

    2004

  15. [15]

    Torigoe, T

    S. Torigoe, T. Hattori, K. Kodama, T. Honda, H. Sagayama, K. Ikeda, T. Otomo, H. Nitani, H. Abe, H. Murakawa, H. Sakai, and N. Hanasaki, Nanoscale ice- type structural fluctuation in spinel titanates, Phys. Rev. B98, 10.1103/physrevb.98.134443 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.98.134443 2018

  16. [16]

    Molecules

    Y. Horibe, M. Shingu, K. Kurushima, H. Ishibashi, 12 FIG. 8. Energies of the Trimer, Ferri I, II, and AFM (square geometry) states of the orbital-spin-lattice model calculated by ED using the cluster shown in Fig. 4, plotted as functions ofη. Solid and broken lines are the Trimer/Trimer ′ and Ferri I, II phases realized in the classical orbital-lattice mo...

    2006

  17. [17]

    A. J. Browne, S. A. J. Kimber, and J. P. Attfield, Per- sistent Three- and Four-Atom Orbital Molecules in the Spinel AlV2O4, Phys. Rev. Mater.1, 052003 (2017)

    2017

  18. [18]

    M. S. Senn, J. P. Wright, and J. P. Attfield, Charge Order and Three-Site Distortions in the Verwey Structure of Magnetite, Nature481, 173 (2012)

    2012

  19. [19]

    H. F. Pen, J. van den Brink, D. I. Khomskii, and G. A. Sawatzky, Orbital Ordering in a Two-Dimensional Trian- gular Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 1323 (1997)

    1997

  20. [20]

    L. F. Feiner, A. M. Ole´ s, and J. Zaanen, Quantum Melt- ing of Magnetic Order due to Orbital Fluctuations, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 2799 (1997)

    1997

  21. [21]

    Di Matteo, G

    S. Di Matteo, G. Jackeli, C. Lacroix, and N. B. Perkins, Valence-Bond Crystal in a Pyrochlore Antiferromagnet with Orbital Degeneracy, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 077208 (2004)

    2004

  22. [22]

    Di Matteo, G

    S. Di Matteo, G. Jackeli, and N. B. Perkins, Valence-bond crystal and lattice distortions in a pyrochlore antiferro- magnet with orbital degeneracy, Phys. Rev. B72, 024431 (2005)

    2005

  23. [23]

    D. I. Khomskii and T. Mizokawa, Orbitally Induced Peierls State in Spinels, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 156402 (2005)

    2005

  24. [24]

    D. I. Khomskii, Different Routes to Spin Gaps: Role of Orbital Ordering, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.159, 319 (2005)

    2005

  25. [25]

    A. M. Ole´ s, P. Horsch, L. F. Feiner, and G. Khali- ullin, Spin-Orbital Entanglement and Violation of the Goodenough-Kanamori Rules, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 147205 (2006)

    2006

  26. [26]

    Jackeli and D

    G. Jackeli and D. I. Khomskii, Classical Dimers and Dimerized Superstructure in an Orbitally Degenerate Honeycomb Antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 147203 (2008)

    2008

  27. [27]

    Okamoto, H

    Y. Okamoto, H. Amano, N. Katayama, H. Sawa, K. Niki, R. Mitoka, H. Harima, T. Hasegawa, N. Ogita, Y. Tanaka, M. Takigawa, Y. Yokoyama, K. Takehana, Y. Imanaka, Y. Nakamura, H. Kishida, and K. Take- naka, Regular-triangle trimer and charge order preserv- ing the Anderson condition in the pyrochlore structure of CsW2O6, Nat. Commun.11, 10.1038/s41467-020-16...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16873- 2020

  28. [28]

    Nakai and C

    H. Nakai and C. Hotta, Perfect flat band with chirality and charge ordering out of strong spin-orbit interaction, Nat. Commun.13, 10.1038/s41467-022-28132-y (2022)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28132-y 2022

  29. [29]

    Onoda, T

    M. Onoda, T. Naka, and H. Nagasawa, Phase Transition and Spin Dynamics in LiVO2, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.60, 2550 (1991)

    1991

  30. [30]

    W. Tian, M. B. Stone, D. G. Mandrus, B. C. Sales, R. Jin, D. T. Adroja, and S. E. Nagler, Magnetic Ex- citations in the Orbitally Degenerate Triangular Lattice LiVO2, Physica B385–386, 50 (2006)

    2006

  31. [31]

    Kojima, N

    K. Kojima, N. Katayama, S. Tamura, M. Shiomi, and H. Sawa, Vanadium Trimers Randomly Aligned Along thec-Axis Direction in Layered LiVO 2, Phys. Rev. B 100, 235120 (2019)

    2019

  32. [32]

    Tanaka, Y

    T. Tanaka, Y. Kawasaki, S. Endou, S. Kimura, Y. Ideta, Y. Kishimoto, T. Ohno, N. Katayama, M. Nohara, and H. Takagi, Trimer V 3+ Spin Singlet State and Pseudo Gap in LiVS 2 Studied by 51V and 7Li Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.78, 054709 (2009)

    2009

  33. [33]

    Kawasaki, Y

    Y. Kawasaki, Y. Kishimoto, T. Tanaka, T. Ohno, S. Ni- itaka, N. Katayama, and H. Takagi, NMR Study of Mag- netic Excitation in LiVX 2 (X = O, S), J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.320, 012028 (2011)

    2011

  34. [34]

    Katayama, K

    N. Katayama, K. Kojima, T. Yamaguchi, S. Hattori, S. Tamura, K. Ohara, S. Kobayashi, K. Sugimoto, Y. Ohta, K. Saitoh, and H. Sawa, Slow Dynamics of Dis- ordered Zigzag Chain Molecules in Layered LiVS2 Under Electron Irradiation, npj Quantum Mater.6, 16 (2021)

    2021

  35. [35]

    Kojima, N

    K. Kojima, N. Katayama, K. Sugimoto, N. Hirao, Y. Ohta, and H. Sawa, Zigzag Chain Order of LiVSe2 De- veloping Away from the Vanadium Trimer Phase Tran- sition Boundary, Phys. Rev. B108, 094107 (2023)

    2023

  36. [36]

    Jin-no, Y

    T. Jin-no, Y. Shimizu, M. Itoh, S. Niitaka, and H. Takagi, Orbital Reformation with Vanadium Trimerization ind 2 Triangular Lattice LiVO2 Revealed by 51V NMR, Phys. Rev. B87, 075135 (2013)

    2013

  37. [37]

    Katayama, M

    N. Katayama, M. Uchida, D. Hashizume, S. Niitaka, J. Matsuno, D. Matsumura, Y. Nishihata, J. Mizuki, N. Takeshita, A. Gauzzi, M. Nohara, and H. Takagi, Anomalous Metallic State in the Vicinity of Metal to Va- lence Bond Solid Insulator Transition in LiVS 2, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 146405 (2009)

    2009

  38. [38]

    T. M. McQueen, P. W. Stephens, Q. Huang, T. Klim- czuk, F. Ronning, and R. J. Cava, Successive Orbital Ordering Transitions in NaVO2, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 166402 (2008)

    2008

  39. [39]

    T. Jia, G. Zhang, Z. Zeng, and H. Q. Lin, Orbitally re- lieved magnetic frustration in NaVO2, Phys. Rev. B80, 045103 (2009)

    2009

  40. [40]

    H¨ anni, M

    N. H¨ anni, M. Frontzek, J. Hauser, D. Cheptiakov, and K. Kr¨ amer, Low temperature phases of Na2Ti3Cl8 revis- ited, Zeitschrift f¨ ur anorganische und allgemeine Chemie 643, 2063–2069 (2017)

    2063

  41. [41]

    J. B. Goodenough, G. Dutta, and A. Manthiram, Lattice Instabilities Near the Critical V-V Separation for Local- 13 ized Versus Itinerant Electrons in LiV1−yMyO2 (M = Cr or Ti); Li 1−xVO2, Phys. Rev. B43, 10170 (1991)

    1991

  42. [42]

    Yoshitake and Y

    J. Yoshitake and Y. Motome, Trimer Formation and Metal-Insulator Transition in Orbital Degenerate Sys- tems on a Triangular Lattice, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.80, 073711 (2011)

    2011

  43. [43]

    Tobochnik, Properties of theq-state clock model for q= 4,5,and6, Phys

    J. Tobochnik, Properties of theq-state clock model for q= 4,5,and6, Phys. Rev. B26, 6201 (1982)

    1982

  44. [44]

    M. S. S. Challa and D. P. Landau, Critical behavior of the six-state clock model in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B33, 437 (1986)

    1986

  45. [45]

    Tomita and Y

    Y. Tomita and Y. Okabe, Probability-changing cluster al- gorithm for two-dimensional XY and clock models, Phys. Rev. B65, 184405 (2002)

    2002

  46. [46]

    Chatterjee, S

    S. Chatterjee, S. Puri, and R. Paul, Ordering kinetics in theq-state clock model: Scaling properties and growth laws, Phys. Rev. E98, 032109 (2018)

    2018

  47. [47]

    Li, L.-P

    Z.-Q. Li, L.-P. Yang, Z. Y. Xie, H.-H. Tu, H.-J. Liao, and T. Xiang, Critical properties of the two-dimensional q-state clock model, Phys. Rev. E101, 060105(R) (2020)

    2020

  48. [48]

    Metropolis, A

    N. Metropolis, A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller, and E. Teller, Equation of State Calcula- tions by Fast Computing Machines, J. Chem. Phys.21, 1087 (1953)

    1953