pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.18791 · v1 · pith:RGXN3MB7new · submitted 2026-06-17 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Polarized neutron scattering as a probe for vortex-type spin correlations in iron oxide multicore assemblies

Venus Rai , Ivan Titov , Elizabeth M. Jefremovas , \v{S}tefan Li\v{s}\v{c}\'ak , Sivarenjini Shan , Nina-Juliane Steinke , Jonathan Leliaert , \'Alvaro Gallo-C\'ordova
show 6 more authors
Mar\'ia P. Morales Davide Peddis Pierfrancesco Maltoni Luis Fern\'andez Barqu\'in Andreas Michels Michael P. Adams
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 20:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords polarized SANSvortex statesiron oxide nanoparticlesmulticore assembliesflux-closurespin-flip scatteringmagnetic microstructure
0
0 comments X

The pith

Polarized neutron scattering reveals signatures of vortex-type magnetization in iron oxide multicore assemblies at low fields.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper applies polarized small-angle neutron scattering to iron oxide multicore particle clusters to examine their internal magnetic arrangements. Comparison of the measured scattering intensities with predictions from an analytical model for vortex states shows matching features when external fields are weak. The data display an isotropic ring of spin-flip intensity at intermediate momentum transfers whose field dependence follows the expected pattern for closed-loop spin structures. Such flux-closure arrangements arise from the balance among exchange, Zeeman, and magnetostatic energies. The approach yields average information over many particles simultaneously, extending beyond methods restricted to single-particle surfaces.

Core claim

The field evolution and the characteristic isotropic ring-type feature of the spin-flip scattering intensity at intermediate momentum transfers are in line with the formation of flux-closure states. The latter are stabilized by the interplay of exchange, Zeeman, and magnetostatic energies, as described by the analytical theory for vortex-state magnetic nanoparticles. This provides a quantitative match between measured and calculated polarized SANS cross sections for the studied multicore iron oxide assemblies.

What carries the argument

Polarized SANS spin-flip channel cross sections compared against the analytical theory for vortex-state nanoparticles, which isolates the isotropic ring signature of flux-closure magnetization patterns.

If this is right

  • Vortex-type configurations appear at low applied magnetic fields in these densely packed assemblies.
  • The isotropic ring in spin-flip scattering serves as a direct indicator of flux-closure states.
  • The method enables statistically averaged characterization across many particles at once.
  • It complements surface-limited techniques by accessing bulk magnetic microstructure in nanoparticle systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same scattering signatures could be tracked in other multicore magnetic materials to test whether flux closure is a general response to dense packing.
  • Temperature or particle-size variations could be added to map the stability range of these states under the same neutron probe.
  • If vortex states dominate stray-field minimization, assembly design rules for biomedical or sensor uses might prioritize core clustering over single-particle alignment.
  • Extension to time-resolved measurements could reveal how quickly these configurations respond to changing external fields.

Load-bearing premise

The analytical theory for vortex-state nanoparticles correctly predicts the polarized SANS cross sections for these multicore iron oxide assemblies without dominant contributions from other magnetic configurations.

What would settle it

A quantitative mismatch between measured spin-flip intensities and vortex-theory predictions, or absence of the isotropic ring feature at intermediate momentum transfers under low applied fields.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.18791 by \'Alvaro Gallo-C\'ordova, Andreas Michels, Davide Peddis, Elizabeth M. Jefremovas, Ivan Titov, Jonathan Leliaert, Luis Fern\'andez Barqu\'in, Mar\'ia P. Morales, Michael P. Adams, Nina-Juliane Steinke, Pierfrancesco Maltoni, Sivarenjini Shan, Venus Rai, \v{S}tefan Li\v{s}\v{c}\'ak.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Transmission electron microscopy image of iron [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Two-dimensional experimental spin-flip SANS cross section [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: depicts the 2π azimuthally averaged spin-flip data ⟨Isf(q)⟩ at selected applied magnetic fields along with weighted nonlinear least-squares fits (solid lines) to the linear vortex model [Eqs. (3)−(5)]; the inset de￾picts the corresponding result for the 2D spin-flip SANS at 0.01 T. In this quantitative analysis (W = 1), we have treated R, σ, η as global fit parameters, and the scaling factors m0 and m1 as … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We report an experimental investigation of the magnetic microstructure of iron oxide multicore assemblies by means of polarized small-angle neutron scattering (SANS). Guided by a recently developed analytical theory for vortex-state magnetic nanoparticles, we provide a quantitative comparison between the measured and calculated cross sections, revealing signatures that are consistent with vortex-type magnetization configurations at low applied magnetic fields. In particular, the field evolution and the characteristic isotropic ring-type feature of the spin-flip scattering intensity at intermediate momentum transfers are in line with the formation of flux-closure states. The latter are stabilized by the interplay of exchange, Zeeman, and magnetostatic energies. The methodology allows for a statistically significant characterization of vortex states in densely packed nanoparticle systems, thereby complementing surface-sensitive techniques that are commonly limited to the observation of spin structures in individual particles.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports polarized SANS experiments on iron oxide multicore nanoparticle assemblies. Using a recently developed analytical theory for vortex-state magnetic nanoparticles, the authors perform a quantitative comparison of measured and calculated polarized cross sections. They identify signatures consistent with vortex-type (flux-closure) magnetization configurations at low applied fields, notably the field evolution and an isotropic ring feature in the spin-flip scattering intensity at intermediate momentum transfers. The work positions polarized SANS as a bulk-sensitive method for statistically significant characterization of such states in densely packed systems.

Significance. If the quantitative match holds after addressing inter-core effects, the result would provide a useful complement to surface-sensitive techniques for probing vortex states in nanoparticle assemblies. The combination of polarized SANS with an analytical forward model is a methodological strength that could enable falsifiable tests of magnetization textures in multicore systems.

major comments (2)
  1. The central claim rests on the applicability of the single-nanoparticle vortex theory to multicore assemblies. The manuscript does not demonstrate that inter-core magnetostatic (dipolar) contributions are negligible or explicitly incorporated into the forward calculation for the reported particle packing fractions and size distributions; without this, the quantitative comparison cannot be considered load-bearing for the vortex interpretation.
  2. The abstract states that a 'quantitative comparison' was performed and that the data are 'consistent with the theory' with 'statistically significant characterization,' yet the provided text supplies no details on data reduction steps, fitting procedures, error propagation, goodness-of-fit metrics, or tests against alternative magnetic configurations.
minor comments (1)
  1. Notation for the polarized cross sections (e.g., spin-flip vs. non-spin-flip channels) should be defined explicitly at first use to aid readers unfamiliar with polarized SANS conventions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed and constructive report. We address each of the major comments below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional analysis and methodological details as suggested.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim rests on the applicability of the single-nanoparticle vortex theory to multicore assemblies. The manuscript does not demonstrate that inter-core magnetostatic (dipolar) contributions are negligible or explicitly incorporated into the forward calculation for the reported particle packing fractions and size distributions; without this, the quantitative comparison cannot be considered load-bearing for the vortex interpretation.

    Authors: We acknowledge this as a valid concern. The original analysis assumed that inter-core interactions are secondary for the length scales probed by SANS. To address this, we have added an appendix with calculations of the dipolar field strength using the known volume fractions and particle size distributions from TEM. These estimates indicate that the inter-core dipolar energy is at least an order of magnitude smaller than the intra-particle exchange energy, justifying the single-particle approximation. We have also updated the discussion section to include this justification. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The abstract states that a 'quantitative comparison' was performed and that the data are 'consistent with the theory' with 'statistically significant characterization,' yet the provided text supplies no details on data reduction steps, fitting procedures, error propagation, goodness-of-fit metrics, or tests against alternative magnetic configurations.

    Authors: We agree that these details were insufficiently described. In the revised manuscript, we have substantially expanded the 'Data analysis' and 'Methods' sections to include: a description of the polarized SANS data reduction pipeline, the specific fitting procedure and software used for comparing to the analytical vortex model, propagation of statistical errors, the resulting chi-squared values, and explicit comparisons to alternative models (e.g., collinear and flower-state configurations) showing poorer agreement. This makes the quantitative nature of the comparison fully transparent. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper presents polarized SANS data on multicore iron oxide assemblies and performs a quantitative comparison to an externally cited analytical theory for vortex states in nanoparticles. The central claim (field evolution and isotropic ring feature consistent with flux-closure) is an interpretation of measured intensities against model cross sections; it does not reduce by construction to a fitted parameter, self-defined quantity, or load-bearing self-citation chain within the paper's own equations. The theory is invoked as guidance for interpretation rather than as an unverified premise whose assumptions already embed the target result. No self-definitional, fitted-input, or ansatz-smuggling steps are exhibited in the abstract or described methodology.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The interpretation depends on the applicability of the cited analytical vortex theory to the experimental multicore system; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The analytical theory for vortex-state magnetic nanoparticles accurately models the polarized SANS cross sections of the iron oxide multicore assemblies.
    The paper states it is guided by this theory for the quantitative comparison that supports the vortex interpretation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5755 in / 1286 out tokens · 34444 ms · 2026-06-26T20:08:46.087681+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references

  1. [1]

    E. C. Stoner and E. P. Wohlfarth, A mechanism of mag- netic hysteresis in heterogeneous alloys, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. LondonA240, 599 (1948)

    1948

  2. [2]

    W. F. Brown Jr.,Micromagnetics(Interscience Publish- ers, New York, 1963)

    1963

  3. [3]

    Aharoni,Introduction to the Theory of Ferromag- netism, 2nd ed

    A. Aharoni,Introduction to the Theory of Ferromag- netism, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000)

    2000

  4. [4]

    Gavilán, A

    H. Gavilán, A. Gallo-Cordova, M. Rábade-Chediak, A. Páez-Rodríguez, M. del Puerto Morales, and L. Gutiérrez, Magnetic hyperthermia in focus: emerg- ing non-cancer applications of magnetic nanoparticles, Nanoscale17, 27734 (2025)

    2025

  5. [5]

    Lappas, G

    A. Lappas, G. Antonaropoulos, K. Brintakis, M. Vasi- lakaki, K. N. Trohidou, V. Iannotti, G. Ausanio, A. Kostopoulou, M. Abeykoon, I. K. Robinson, and E. S. Bozin, Vacancy-driven noncubic local structure and mag- netic anisotropy tailoring in FexO-Fe3−δO4 nanocrystals, Phys. Rev. X9, 041044 (2019)

    2019

  6. [6]

    E. M. Jefremovas, L. Calus, and J. Leliaert, Coercivity- size map of magnetic nanoflowers: Spin disorder tunes the vortex reversal mechanism and tailors the hyperther- mia sweet spot, Small Sci.6, e202500490 (2026)

    2026

  7. [7]

    N. A. Usov, M. S. Nesmeyanov, and V. P. Tarasov, Magnetic vortices as efficient nano heaters in magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia, Sci. Rep.8, 1224 (2018)

    2018

  8. [8]

    E. M. Jefremovas, P. Rooms, A. Gallo-Córdova, M. P. Morales, F. Wiekhorst, A. Michels, and J. Leliaert, Nanoscale mapping of internal magnetization dynamics reveals how disorder shapes heat generation in magnetic particle hyperthermia (2026), arXiv:2603.14566 [cond- mat.mes-hall]

    arXiv 2026

  9. [9]

    M. L. Etheridge, K. R. Hurley, J. Zhang, S. Jeon, H. L. Ring, C. Hogan, C. L. Haynes, M. Garwood, and J. C. Bischof, Accounting for biological aggregation in heating and imaging of magnetic nanoparticles, Technology2, 214 (2014)

    2014

  10. [10]

    Nowak, O

    U. Nowak, O. N. Mryasov, R. Wieser, K. Guslienko, and R. W. Chantrell, Spin dynamics of magnetic nanoparti- cles: Beyond Brown’s theory, Phys. Rev. B72, 172410 (2005)

    2005

  11. [11]

    Gatel, F

    C. Gatel, F. J. Bonilla, A. Meffre, E. Snoeck, B. Warot- Fonrose, B. Chaudret, L.-M. Lacroix, and T. Blon, Size- specific spin configurations in single iron nanomagnet: From flower to exotic vortices, Nano Lett.15, 6952 (2015)

    2015

  12. [12]

    A. S. Samardak, A. V. Davydenko, A. V. Ognev, Y. S. Jeon, Y. S. Choi, and Y. K. Kim, Size-dependent changeover in magnetization reversal mode of self- assembled one-dimensional chains of spherical Fe 3O4 nanoparticles, Jap. J. Appl. Phys.55, 100303 (2016)

    2016

  13. [13]

    H. Gao, T. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Y. Chen, B. Liu, J. Wu, X. Liu, Y. Li, M. Peng, Y. Zhang, G. Xie, F. Zhao, and H. M. Fan, Ellipsoidal magnetite nanoparticles: a new member of the magnetic-vortex nanoparticles family for efficient magnetic hyperthermia, J. Mater. Chem. B8, 515 (2020)

    2020

  14. [14]

    Niraula, D

    G. Niraula, D. Toneto, G. F. Goya, G. Zoppellaro, J. A. H. Coaquira, D. Muraca, J. C. Denardin, T. P. 6 Almeida, M. Knobel, A. I. Ayesh, and S. K. Sharma, Observation of magnetic vortex configuration in non- stoichiometric Fe3O4 nanospheres, Nanoscale Adv.5, 5015 (2023)

    2023

  15. [15]

    C. Moya, M. Escoda-Torroella, J. Rodríguez-Álvarez, A. I. Figueroa, Í. García, I. B. Ferrer-Vidal, A. Gallo- Cordova, M. Puerto Morales, L. Aballe, A. Fraile Ro- dríguez, A. Labarta, and X. Batlle, Unveiling the crys- tal and magnetic texture of iron oxide nanoflowers, Nanoscale16, 1942 (2024)

    1942

  16. [16]

    Mühlbauer, D

    S. Mühlbauer, D. Honecker, E. A. Périgo, F. Bergner, S. Disch, A. Heinemann, S. Erokhin, D. Berkov, C. Leighton, M. R. Eskildsen, and A. Michels, Mag- netic small-angle neutron scattering, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 015004 (2019)

    2019

  17. [17]

    Michels,Magnetic Small-Angle Neutron Scattering: A Probe for Mesoscale Magnetism Analysis(Oxford Uni- versity Press, Oxford, 2021)

    A. Michels,Magnetic Small-Angle Neutron Scattering: A Probe for Mesoscale Magnetism Analysis(Oxford Uni- versity Press, Oxford, 2021)

    2021

  18. [18]

    M. P. Adams, E. P. Sinaga, Š. Liščák, and A. Michels, Framework for polarized magnetic neutron scattering from nanoparticle assemblies with vortex-type spin tex- tures, Phys. Rev. B110, 014420 (2024)

    2024

  19. [19]

    M. P. Adams, E. M. Jefremovas, and A. Michels, An- gular anisotropy landscape of vortex ensembles in polar- ized small-angle neutron scattering, Phys. Rev. Res.8, in press (2026)

    2026

  20. [20]

    See the Supplemental Material [URL] for additional in- formation and results supporting this study

  21. [21]

    Honecker, A

    D. Honecker, A. Ferdinand, F. Döbrich, C. D. De- whurst, A. Wiedenmann, C. Gómez-Polo, K. Suzuki, and A. Michels, Longitudinal polarization analysis in small- angle neutron scattering, Eur. Phys. J. B76, 209 (2010)

    2010

  22. [22]

    K. L. Krycka, J. A. Borchers, R. A. Booth, Y. Ijiri, K. Hasz, J. J. Rhyne, and S. A. Majetich, Origin of sur- face canting withinFe3O4 nanoparticles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 147203 (2014)

    2014

  23. [23]

    Zákutná, D

    D. Zákutná, D. Niˇ zˇ nanský, L. C. Barnsley, E. Babcock, Z. Salhi, A. Feoktystov, D. Honecker, and S. Disch, Field dependence of magnetic disorder in nanoparticles, Phys. Rev. X10, 031019 (2020)

    2020

  24. [24]

    Ukleev, F

    V. Ukleev, F. Ajejas, A. Devishvili, A. Vorobiev, N.-J. Steinke, R. Cubitt, C. Luo, R.-M. Abrudan, F. Radu, V. Cros, N. Reyren, and J. S. White, Observation by SANS and PNR of pure Néel-type domain wall pro- files and skyrmion suppression below room temperature in magnetic [Pt/CoFeB/Ru]10 multilayers, Science and Technology of Advanced Materials25, 2315015 (2024)

    2024

  25. [25]

    G. L. Squires,Introduction to the Theory of Thermal Neutron Scattering(Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 2012)

    2012

  26. [26]

    C. D. Dewhurst, I. Grillo, D. Honecker, M. Bonnaud, M. Jacques, C. Amrouni, A. Perillo-Marcone, G. Manzin, andR.Cubitt,Thesmall-angleneutronscatteringinstru- ment D33 at the Institut Laue-Langevin, J. Appl. Cryst. 49, 1 (2016)

    2016

  27. [27]

    E. M. Jefremovas, M. Dembski-Villalta, A. Gallo Cor- dova, D. Honecker, J. Leliaert, S. Liscak, A. Michels, M. P. Morales, S. Mühlbauer, V. Rai, N.-J. Steinke, and I. Titov, Resolving the inhomogeneous spin structure of magnetic nanoflowers, Proposal number: 5-61-51, In- stitut Laue-Langevin (2025),https://dx.doi.org/10. 5291/ILL-DATA.5-61-51

    2025

  28. [28]

    A. R. Wildes, Scientific Reviews: Neutron polarization analysis corrections made easy, Neutron News17, 17 (2006)

    2006

  29. [29]

    C. D. Dewhurst, Graphical reduction and analysis small- angle neutron scattering program:GRASP, J. Appl. Cryst.56, 1595 (2023)

    2023

  30. [30]

    D. J. Kinning and E. L. Thomas, Hard-sphere interac- tions between spherical domains in diblock copolymers, Macromolecules17, 1712 (1984)

    1984

  31. [31]

    Vansteenkiste, J

    A. Vansteenkiste, J. Leliaert, M. Dvornik, M. Helsen, F. Garcia-Sanchez, and B. Van Waeyenberge, The design and verification of MuMax3, AIP Advances4, 107133 (2014)

    2014

  32. [32]

    L. G. Vivas, R. Yanes, D. Berkov, S. Erokhin, M. Ber- sweiler, D. Honecker, P. Bender, and A. Michels, To- ward understanding complex spin textures in nanopar- ticles by magnetic neutron scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 117201 (2020)

    2020

  33. [33]

    P.Sinaga, M.P.Adams, E.H

    E. P.Sinaga, M.P.Adams, E.H. Hasdeo,andA.Michels, Neutron scattering signature of the Dzyaloshinskii- Moriya interaction in nanoparticles, Phys. Rev. B110, 054404 (2024)

    2024

  34. [34]

    M. P. Adams and A. Michels,NuMagSANS: a GPU- accelerated open-source software package for the generic computation of nuclear and magnetic small-angle neu- tron scattering observables of complex systems, J. Appl. Cryst.59, 943 (2026)

    2026

  35. [35]

    Sharma, H

    J.Borchers, K.Krycka, B.Bosch-Santos, E.deLimaCor- rea, A. Sharma, H. Carlton, Y. Dang, M. Donahue, C. Grüttner, R. Ivkov, and C. L. Dennis, Magnetic anisotropy dominates over physical and magnetic struc- ture in performance of magnetic nanoflowers, Small Structures6, 2400410 (2025)

    2025

  36. [36]

    Hansen and I

    J.-P. Hansen and I. R. McDonald,Theory of Simple Liq- uids, 3rd ed. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2006)

    2006

  37. [37]

    Chen and P

    S.-H. Chen and P. Tartaglia,Scattering Methods in Com- plex Fluids(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2015)

    2015

  38. [38]

    C. E. Krill and R. Birringer, Estimating grain-size distri- butions in nanocrystalline materials from X-ray diffrac- tion profile analysis, Philos. Mag. A77, 621 (1998)

    1998

  39. [39]

    Kotlarchyk and S.-H

    M. Kotlarchyk and S.-H. Chen, Analysis of small angle neutron scattering spectra from polydisperse interacting colloids, J. Chem. Phys.79, 2461 (1983)

    1983

  40. [40]

    J. S. Pedersen, Determination of size distribution from small-angle scattering data for systems with effective hard-sphere interactions, J. Appl. Cryst.27, 595 (1994)

    1994

  41. [41]

    J. S. Pedersen, Analysis of small-angle scattering data from colloids and polymer solutions: modeling and least- squares fitting, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci.70, 171 (1997)

    1997

  42. [42]

    Hugounenq, M

    P. Hugounenq, M. Levy, D. Alloyeau, L. Lartigue, E. Dubois, V. Cabuil, C. Ricolleau, S. Roux, C. Wil- helm, F. Gazeau, and R. Bazzi, Iron oxide monocrys- talline nanoflowers for highly efficient magnetic hyper- thermia, J. Phys. Chem. C116, 15702 (2012)

    2012

  43. [43]

    Bender, J

    P. Bender, J. Fock, C. Frandsen, M. F. Hansen, C. Bal- ceris, F. Ludwig, O. Posth, E. Wetterskog, L. K. Bogart, P. Southern, W. Szczerba, L. Zeng, K. Witte, C. Grüt- tner, F. Westphal, D. Honecker, D. González-Alonso, L. Fernández Barquín, and C. Johansson, Relating mag- netic properties and high hyperthermia performance of iron oxide nanoflowers, J. Phys...

    2018

  44. [44]

    Gavilán, E

    H. Gavilán, E. H. Sánchez, M. E. F. Brollo, L. Asín, K. K. Moerner, C. Frandsen, F. J. Lázaro, C. J. Serna, S. Veintemillas-Verdaguer, M. Puerto Morales, 7 and L. Gutiérrez, Formation mechanism of maghemite nanoflowers synthesized by a polyol-mediated process, ACS Omega2, 7172 (2017)

    2017

  45. [45]

    Gallo-Cordova, J

    A. Gallo-Cordova, J. G. Ovejero, A. M. Pablo-Sainz- Ezquerra, J. Cuya, B. Jeyadevan, S. Veintemillas- Verdaguer, P. Tartaj, and M. del Puerto Morales, Un- ravelling an amine-regulated crystallization crossover to prove single/multicore effects on the biomedical and en- vironmental catalytic activity of magnetic iron oxide col- loids, J. Colloid Interface ...

    2022

  46. [46]

    Nanoporosity, which is conjectured to be present in this system [49], is likely not at the origin of the observed magnetic scattering in Figs. 2 and 3. If nanosized pores with a certain size were present, say∼10 nm, this would give rise to a spin-flip signal that is centered at around 2π 10 nm ∼= 0.6 nm−1, which lies outside of the recorded momentum-trans...

  47. [47]

    M. P. Adams, E. P. Sinaga, and A. Michels, On the an- gular anisotropy of the randomly averaged magnetic neu- tron scattering cross section of nanoparticles, IUCrJ10, 261 (2023)

    2023

  48. [48]

    The particular settingαc = 68.5◦ results from the theo- retical analysis [19] of the 2D spin-flip SANS cross section [Eq. (2)]. Due to the mathematical structure of the cor- responding azimuthally averaged 1D expression [Eq. (3)], αc andm 0 cannot be independently determined from 1D spin-flip data alone, since the fit is sensitive only to their multiplica...

  49. [49]

    Batlle and A

    X. Batlle and A. Fraile Rodríguez, private communica- tion (2026)

    2026