pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.18820 · v1 · pith:PRBRF5O5new · submitted 2026-06-17 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.AI

Maturing Markov Decision Processes: Decision Making under Increasing Information and Shrinking Action Sets

Jiaxi Liu , Aiping Yang , Yuhang Yang , Shuqi Zhang , Zewei Dong , Jiangming Yang , Xuebin Chen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 21:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.AI
keywords Maturing Markov Decision Processesinformation-action asymmetryexpiring actionsreinforcement learningsequential decision makingMDP formulationstructure-aware policies
0
0 comments X

The pith

Maturing Markov Decision Processes capture how information grows while action sets shrink to improve reinforcement learning efficiency.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Standard MDP formulations treat changing information and available actions as independent stage-dependent features, which hides the fact that more data arrives at the same time options expire due to deadlines or commitments. This paper introduces Maturing Markov Decision Processes to represent that nested asymmetry directly. It derives an expiring-action priority principle that flags which decisions cannot wait until the next stage. A structure-aware reinforcement learning method then uses stage-aware policies, action abstraction, and distillation to exploit the structure. Experiments in inventory replenishment, cash management, and a production simulator indicate that the approach reduces learning effort and that the advantage widens as problem size increases.

Core claim

The paper establishes that sequential decision problems exhibit an asymmetric evolution in which richer information is received while feasible actions expire due to operational cutoffs and constraints, and that standard MDP formulations obscure this structure by flattening it into stage-dependent states and action masks. Maturing Markov Decision Processes are defined around the asymmetry and yield an expiring-action priority principle that identifies actions requiring immediate resolution. A corresponding reinforcement learning framework incorporates stage-aware policy design, expiring-action abstraction, and search-augmented learning with distillation; empirical results on multi-supplier re

What carries the argument

Maturing Markov Decision Process, which encodes the nested information-action asymmetry and distinguishes urgent expiring actions from those that can be deferred.

If this is right

  • The expiring-action priority principle identifies which actions must be resolved before the next stage.
  • Stage-aware policy design and expiring-action abstraction improve sample efficiency over standard reinforcement learning methods.
  • Search-augmented learning with distillation further leverages the structure to produce better policies.
  • The performance advantage of explicit asymmetry modeling increases with the size and complexity of the decision problem.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same asymmetry may appear in other sequential settings such as real-time resource allocation or time-sensitive planning, suggesting the framework could be adapted beyond the tested inventory and cash domains.
  • Theoretical analysis could derive regret bounds that explicitly account for action expiration rates rather than treating all actions as equally available across stages.
  • The priority principle might combine with hierarchical reinforcement learning to defer low-urgency subproblems automatically.

Load-bearing premise

That flattening the information-action asymmetry into ordinary stage-dependent MDPs with action masks materially reduces performance compared with an explicit formulation of the asymmetry.

What would settle it

Run the same reinforcement learning algorithms on the production-scale simulator once with the explicit MMDP structure and once with an equivalent standard MDP that uses only stage-dependent action masks, then measure whether the sample-efficiency gap disappears when the asymmetry is artificially removed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.18820 by Aiping Yang, Jiangming Yang, Jiaxi Liu, Shuqi Zhang, Xuebin Chen, Yuhang Yang, Zewei Dong.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Maturing Markov Decision Processes. Left: early stage with limited state information but many feasible actions. Right: later stage with increasing information while action sets shrink. Standard, constrained, non-stationary, and partially observable MDP variants address fixed dynamics, feasibility constraints, time-varying environments, or observation uncertainty [10–15]. Standard finite-horizon MDPs can ab… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: MMDP structure in the two application domains. (a) the replenishment problem unfolds over repeated cycles with a single decision at each stage. (b) the cash management problem unfolds over a daily decision cycle with multiple transfer steps within each stage. procurement cost but require earlier commitment, whereas more flexible suppliers allow later orders at a higher price. Each trajectory consists of mu… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Performance comparison between flat MDP and MMDP formulations in the staged [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Training dynamics in simplified cash-management benchmarks. MMDP-based methods outperform Flat-MDP PPO in both settings, and search further improves performance. Shaded areas indicate standard deviation over n = 5 seeds. 5.2 Cash Management Case Study We next evaluate the proposed framework in a cash-management problem derived from a real industrial application. Corporate cash management has long been stud… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Final performance in larger cash-management settings. MMDP-style interfaces improve matched direct-LLM baselines, while structure-aware RL with abstraction and search performs best. Higher values indicate better final evaluation reward. 5.2.2 Ten-account setting. We next consider the ten-account environment, which scales the same cash-management problem to a substantially larger account network and a corre… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Sequential decision problems often exhibit an asymmetric evolution of information and decision flexibility: as a decision cycle unfolds, the agent receives richer information while feasible actions expire due to operational cutoffs, commitments, or resource constraints. Standard MDP formulations typically flatten this structure into stage-dependent state descriptions and action masks, thereby obscuring the nested information--action asymmetry that determines which decisions are urgent and which can be deferred. We introduce Maturing Markov Decision Processes (MMDPs), a formulation built around this information--action asymmetry. We characterize one of its key consequences through an expiring-action priority principle, which identifies the actions that must be resolved before the next stage. Motivated by this structure, we develop a structure-aware reinforcement learning framework with stage-aware policy design, expiring-action abstraction, and search-augmented learning with distillation. Experiments on a controlled multi-supplier replenishment problem, simplified cash-management environments of increasing complexity, and a production-scale simulator show that explicitly modeling this asymmetry improves learning efficiency and becomes increasingly valuable as decision problems scale.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces Maturing Markov Decision Processes (MMDPs) to model sequential decision problems with asymmetric growth in information and shrinkage in feasible actions. It derives an expiring-action priority principle from this structure and develops a structure-aware RL framework using stage-aware policy design, expiring-action abstraction, and search-augmented learning with distillation. Experiments on a controlled multi-supplier replenishment problem, simplified cash-management environments of increasing scale, and a production-scale simulator are reported to show improved learning efficiency that grows with problem size.

Significance. If the empirical results hold, the work supplies a structured formulation and algorithmic approach for a recurring pattern in applied decision problems that standard stage-dependent MDPs with masks tend to flatten. The scaling experiments across controlled to production domains provide a concrete test of whether the asymmetry-aware modeling yields measurable gains; this is a positive feature of the evaluation design.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim of improved efficiency would be easier to evaluate if the abstract named the baselines, the primary performance metric, and whether error bars or statistical tests accompany the reported gains.
  2. The priority principle is presented as a key consequence of the MMDP formulation; a short self-contained derivation or proof sketch in the main text (rather than only in an appendix) would strengthen accessibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary of the manuscript, recognition of the scaling experiments, and recommendation of minor revision. The referee's description of the MMDP formulation, expiring-action priority principle, and structure-aware RL framework aligns closely with our contributions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper defines MMDPs as a new formulation centered on the information-action asymmetry, derives the expiring-action priority principle directly from that structure, and evaluates a structure-aware RL method on external controlled and production-scale domains. No step reduces a claimed prediction or principle to a fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or definitional renaming; the central empirical claim (efficiency gains that increase with scale) is tested against independent benchmarks rather than being forced by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no equations, no modeling assumptions, and no experimental details, so no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be identified with certainty.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5728 in / 1130 out tokens · 25808 ms · 2026-06-26T21:45:53.409965+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Dynamic pricing of inventory/capacity with infrequent price changes

    Serguei Netessine. Dynamic pricing of inventory/capacity with infrequent price changes. European Journal of Operational Research, 174(1):553–580, 2006

    2006

  2. [2]

    Dynamic pricing and demand learning with limited price experimentation.Operations Research, 65(6):1722–1731, 2017

    Wang Chi Cheung, David Simchi-Levi, and He Wang. Dynamic pricing and demand learning with limited price experimentation.Operations Research, 65(6):1722–1731, 2017

    2017

  3. [3]

    Inventory management with advance demand information and flexible delivery.Management Science, 54(4):716–732, 2008

    Tong Wang and Beril L Toktay. Inventory management with advance demand information and flexible delivery.Management Science, 54(4):716–732, 2008

    2008

  4. [4]

    Jiaxi Liu, Shuyi Lin, Linwei Xin, and Yidong Zhang. Ai vs. human buyers: A study of alibaba’s inventory replenishment system.INFORMS Journal on Applied Analytics, 53(5):372–387, 2023

    2023

  5. [5]

    Deepstock: Reinforcement learning with policy regularizations for inventory management.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.19621, 2026

    Yaqi Xie, Xinru Hao, Jiaxi Liu, Will Ma, Linwei Xin, Lei Cao, and Yidong Zhang. Deepstock: Reinforcement learning with policy regularizations for inventory management.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.19621, 2026

    arXiv 2026

  6. [6]

    Maximum weight online matching with deadlines.arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.03526, 2018

    Itai Ashlagi, Maximilien Burq, Chinmoy Dutta, Patrick Jaillet, Amin Saberi, and Chris Sholley. Maximum weight online matching with deadlines.arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.03526, 2018

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  7. [7]

    Learning to cover: online learning and optimiza- tion with irreversible decisions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.14777, 2024

    Alexandre Jacquillat and Michael Lingzhi Li. Learning to cover: online learning and optimiza- tion with irreversible decisions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.14777, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Dynamic optimization of cash flow management decisions: a stochastic model.IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 37(3):203–212, 1990

    M Elisabeth Pate-Cornell, George Tagaras, and Kathleen M Eisenhardt. Dynamic optimization of cash flow management decisions: a stochastic model.IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 37(3):203–212, 1990

    1990

  9. [9]

    Estimating policy functions in payment systems using reinforcement learning.ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation, 13(1):1–31, 2025

    Pablo Castro, Ajit Desai, Han Du, Rodney Garratt, and Francisco Rivadeneyra. Estimating policy functions in payment systems using reinforcement learning.ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation, 13(1):1–31, 2025. 10

    2025

  10. [10]

    John Wiley & Sons, 2014

    Martin L Puterman.Markov decision processes: discrete stochastic dynamic programming. John Wiley & Sons, 2014

    2014

  11. [11]

    MIT press Cambridge, 1998

    Richard S Sutton, Andrew G Barto, et al.Reinforcement learning: An introduction. MIT press Cambridge, 1998

    1998

  12. [12]

    Routledge, 2021

    Eitan Altman.Constrained Markov decision processes. Routledge, 2021

    2021

  13. [13]

    Non-stationary markov decision processes, a worst-case approach using model-based reinforcement learning.Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019

    Erwan Lecarpentier and Emmanuel Rachelson. Non-stationary markov decision processes, a worst-case approach using model-based reinforcement learning.Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019

    2019

  14. [14]

    Planning and acting in partially observable stochastic domains.Artificial intelligence, 101(1-2):99–134, 1998

    Leslie Pack Kaelbling, Michael L Littman, and Anthony R Cassandra. Planning and acting in partially observable stochastic domains.Artificial intelligence, 101(1-2):99–134, 1998

    1998

  15. [15]

    A tutorial on partially observable markov decision processes.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 53(3):119–125, 2009

    Michael L Littman. A tutorial on partially observable markov decision processes.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 53(3):119–125, 2009

    2009

  16. [16]

    Deep reinforcement learning in parameterized action space.arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.04143, 2015

    Matthew Hausknecht and Peter Stone. Deep reinforcement learning in parameterized action space.arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.04143, 2015

    arXiv 2015

  17. [17]

    Reinforcement learning with pa- rameterized actions

    Warwick Masson, Pravesh Ranchod, and George Konidaris. Reinforcement learning with pa- rameterized actions. InProceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, volume 30, 2016

    2016

  18. [18]

    Mastering the game of go without human knowledge.nature, 550(7676):354–359, 2017

    David Silver, Julian Schrittwieser, Karen Simonyan, Ioannis Antonoglou, Aja Huang, Arthur Guez, Thomas Hubert, Lucas Baker, Matthew Lai, Adrian Bolton, et al. Mastering the game of go without human knowledge.nature, 550(7676):354–359, 2017

    2017

  19. [19]

    Thinking fast and slow with deep learning and tree search.Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017

    Thomas Anthony, Zheng Tian, and David Barber. Thinking fast and slow with deep learning and tree search.Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017

    2017

  20. [20]

    McGraw-hill New York, 1999

    David Simchi-Levi, Philip Kaminsky, and Edith Simchi-Levi.Designing and managing the supply chain: Concepts, strategies, and cases. McGraw-hill New York, 1999

    1999

  21. [21]

    Zipkin.Foundations of Inventory Management

    Paul H. Zipkin.Foundations of Inventory Management. McGraw-Hill, New York, 2000

    2000

  22. [22]

    Now or later: A simple policy for effective dual sourcing in capacitated systems.Operations Research, 56(4):850–864, 2008

    Senthil Veeraraghavan and Alan Scheller-Wolf. Now or later: A simple policy for effective dual sourcing in capacitated systems.Operations Research, 56(4):850–864, 2008

    2008

  23. [23]

    Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning.nature, 518(7540):529–533, 2015

    V olodymyr Mnih, Koray Kavukcuoglu, David Silver, Andrei A Rusu, Joel Veness, Marc G Bellemare, Alex Graves, Martin Riedmiller, Andreas K Fidjeland, Georg Ostrovski, et al. Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning.nature, 518(7540):529–533, 2015

    2015

  24. [24]

    Proximal policy optimization algorithms.arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347, 2017

    John Schulman, Filip Wolski, Prafulla Dhariwal, Alec Radford, and Oleg Klimov. Proximal policy optimization algorithms.arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347, 2017

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  25. [25]

    The transactions demand for cash: An inventory theoretic approach.The Quarterly journal of economics, 66(4):545–556, 1952

    William J Baumol. The transactions demand for cash: An inventory theoretic approach.The Quarterly journal of economics, 66(4):545–556, 1952

    1952

  26. [26]

    A model of the demand for money by firms.The Quarterly journal of economics, 80(3):413–435, 1966

    Merton H Miller and Daniel Orr. A model of the demand for money by firms.The Quarterly journal of economics, 80(3):413–435, 1966

    1966

  27. [27]

    The utility of cash flow forecasts in the management of corporate cash balances.European journal of operational research, 182(2):923–935, 2007

    Fionnuala M Gormley and Nigel Meade. The utility of cash flow forecasts in the management of corporate cash balances.European journal of operational research, 182(2):923–935, 2007

    2007

  28. [28]

    Cash management using multi-stage stochastic program- ming.Quantitative Finance, 10(2):209–219, 2010

    Robert Ferstl and Alex Weissensteiner. Cash management using multi-stage stochastic program- ming.Quantitative Finance, 10(2):209–219, 2010

    2010

  29. [29]

    Learning combinatorial optimization algorithms over graphs.Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017

    Elias Khalil, Hanjun Dai, Yuyu Zhang, Bistra Dilkina, and Le Song. Learning combinatorial optimization algorithms over graphs.Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017

    2017

  30. [30]

    Reinforcement learning for solving the vehicle routing problem.Advances in neural information processing systems, 31, 2018

    Mohammadreza Nazari, Afshin Oroojlooy, Lawrence Snyder, and Martin Takác. Reinforcement learning for solving the vehicle routing problem.Advances in neural information processing systems, 31, 2018. 11

    2018

  31. [31]

    Reinforcement learning with combinatorial actions: An application to vehicle routing.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:609–620, 2020

    Arthur Delarue, Ross Anderson, and Christian Tjandraatmadja. Reinforcement learning with combinatorial actions: An application to vehicle routing.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:609–620, 2020

    2020

  32. [32]

    Recurrent model-free rl can be a strong baseline for many pomdps.arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.05038, 2021

    Tianwei Ni, Benjamin Eysenbach, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. Recurrent model-free rl can be a strong baseline for many pomdps.arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.05038, 2021

    arXiv 2021

  33. [33]

    Empowering cash managers to achieve cost savings by improving predictive accuracy

    Francisco Salas-Molina, Francisco J Martin, Juan A Rodriguez-Aguilar, Joan Serrá, and Josep Ll Arcos. Empowering cash managers to achieve cost savings by improving predictive accuracy. International Journal of Forecasting, 33(2):403–415, 2017

    2017

  34. [34]

    Zhihong Shao, Peiyi Wang, Qihao Zhu, Runxin Xu, Junxiao Song, Xiao Bi, Haowei Zhang, Mingchuan Zhang, Y . K. Li, Y . Wu, and Daya Guo. Deepseekmath: Pushing the limits of mathematical reasoning in open language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03300, 2024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    and Sondik, Edward J

    Richard D. Smallwood and Edward J. Sondik. The optimal control of partially observable markov processes over a finite horizon.Operations Research, 21(5):1071–1088, 1973. doi: 10.1287/opre.21.5.1071

    work page doi:10.1287/opre.21.5.1071 1973

  36. [36]

    Partially observable markov decision processes

    Matthijs TJ Spaan. Partially observable markov decision processes. InReinforcement learning: State-of-the-art, pages 387–414. Springer, 2012. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-27645-3_12

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-27645-3_12 2012

  37. [37]

    Near-optimal regret bounds for reinforcement learning.Advances in neural information processing systems, 21, 2008

    Peter Auer, Thomas Jaksch, and Ronald Ortner. Near-optimal regret bounds for reinforcement learning.Advances in neural information processing systems, 21, 2008

    2008

  38. [38]

    Stochastic multi-armed-bandit problem with non-stationary rewards.Advances in neural information processing systems, 27, 2014

    Omar Besbes, Yonatan Gur, and Assaf Zeevi. Stochastic multi-armed-bandit problem with non-stationary rewards.Advances in neural information processing systems, 27, 2014

    2014

  39. [39]

    Reinforcement learning for non- stationary markov decision processes: The blessing of (more) optimism

    Wang Chi Cheung, David Simchi-Levi, and Ruihao Zhu. Reinforcement learning for non- stationary markov decision processes: The blessing of (more) optimism. InInternational conference on machine learning, pages 1843–1854. PMLR, 2020

    2020

  40. [40]

    A survey of reinforcement learning algorithms for dynamically varying environments.ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 54(6):1–25, 2021

    Sindhu Padakandla. A survey of reinforcement learning algorithms for dynamically varying environments.ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 54(6):1–25, 2021

    2021

  41. [41]

    Parisi, Ronald Kemker, Jose L

    German I. Parisi, Ronald Kemker, Jose L. Part, Christopher Kanan, and Stefan Wermter. Continual lifelong learning with neural networks: A review.Neural Networks, 113:54–71, 2019

    2019

  42. [42]

    Towards continual rein- forcement learning: A review and perspectives.Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 75: 1401–1476, 2022

    Khimya Khetarpal, Matthew Riemer, Irina Rish, and Doina Precup. Towards continual rein- forcement learning: A review and perspectives.Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 75: 1401–1476, 2022

    2022

  43. [43]

    Parseval regularization for continual reinforcement learning

    Wesley Chung, Lynn Cherif, David Meger, and Doina Precup. Parseval regularization for continual reinforcement learning. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 37, 2024

    2024

  44. [44]

    Arthur Juliani and Jordan T. Ash. A study of plasticity loss in on-policy deep reinforcement learning. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 37, 2024

    2024

  45. [45]

    Is q-learning provably efficient?Advances in neural information processing systems, 31, 2018

    Chi Jin, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Sebastien Bubeck, and Michael I Jordan. Is q-learning provably efficient?Advances in neural information processing systems, 31, 2018. 12 A Additional Details on MMDP Structure A.1 Interpretation of non-degenerate stages. Remark 3.1 should be read as a statement about the information–action asymmetry isolated by the MMDP abstract...

    2018