Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 minor 291 references

GRMHD and GRRT Simulations of Black Hole Accretion: Flares, Precession, and Complex Spacetimes

T0 review · 0 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-26 · grok-4.3

Pith's one-line read Quantum-gravity corrections modify photon-ring size, polarization, and jet power in black hole accretion simulations

desk verdict Dissertation builds a GRMHD/GRRT framework for Kerr, loop-quantum, and binary black holes with claims on flares, precession, and quantum-modified EHT observables, but the abstract supplies no numbers or checks to assess whether those modifications are real. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.19320 v1 pith:XK3ZU643 submitted 2026-06-17 astro-ph.HE gr-qc

classification astro-ph.HEgr-qc
keywords blackholeaccretionGRMHDsimulationsGRRTloopquantumgravityEventHorizonTelescopephotonringjetprecessionbinaryholes
open problems Quantum Gravity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This dissertation develops a unified numerical framework combining general relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulations and covariant radiative transfer to model accretion, jets, and variability. It first examines standard Kerr black holes, where magnetic field geometry produces reconnection-driven flares and magnetic torques cause disk and jet precession. The framework is then applied to regular loop-quantum black holes, showing that quantum corrections alter key observables. These alterations connect the models directly to Event Horizon Telescope measurements of supermassive black holes.

What carries the argument

The unified GRMHD and GRRT numerical framework applied to regular loop-quantum black hole spacetimes, which alters the metric and thereby changes the accretion flow and emitted radiation

What would settle it

An Event Horizon Telescope measurement showing a photon-ring size around M87* or Sgr A* that matches the exact Kerr prediction with no accompanying shift in polarization structure or jet power would falsify the claim of detectable quantum-gravity modifications.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Simulations of accretion onto regular loop-quantum black holes show that quantum-gravity corrections can modify photon-ring size, polarization structure, and jet power, leading to observational constraints from Event Horizon Telescope data.

Load-bearing premise

The numerical framework accurately captures the physical effects of quantum corrections, magnetic reconnection, and time-dependent spacetimes without dominant artifacts that would invalidate the predicted changes to photon-ring size and jet power.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Multi-loop magnetic configurations produce reconnection events and flux ropes that power near-infrared flares from Sagittarius A*.
  • Tilted magnetically arrested disks experience retrograde precession driven by magnetic torques.
  • Supermassive binary black hole simulations show gravitational self-lensing, shocks, and spin-orbit coupling shaping multi-wavelength light curves and jet precession.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same framework could be applied to other non-Kerr metrics to predict additional observable differences in ring size and polarization.
  • Future higher-resolution Event Horizon Telescope data might distinguish specific loop-quantum models from the Kerr case through combined ring and jet measurements.
  • Precession signatures in binary simulations suggest a possible observational channel for identifying supermassive black hole binaries.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. This dissertation develops a unified GRMHD/GRRT numerical framework and applies it to black-hole accretion in Kerr, regular loop-quantum, and time-dependent binary spacetimes. For Kerr cases it examines magnetic-geometry effects on reconnection-driven NIR flares, delayed mm emission, and retrograde precession in tilted MADs. For loop-quantum black holes it reports that quantum corrections alter photon-ring size, polarization structure, and jet power, yielding EHT constraints. Binary simulations address gravitational self-lensing, shocks, and spin-orbit effects on multi-wavelength light curves and jet precession.

Significance. If the numerical results hold, the work supplies concrete, observationally testable predictions for how non-Kerr metrics and binary dynamics modify EHT-accessible quantities (photon-ring diameter, polarization maps, jet power). The unified framework across isolated and binary spacetimes is a methodological strength; the loop-quantum runs constitute one of the first end-to-end GRMHD+GRRT explorations of regular quantum-corrected black holes.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and provided text use first-person phrasing typical of a dissertation; a journal article version should adopt conventional impersonal style.
  2. No resolution or convergence studies are referenced in the supplied sections; adding a brief methods subsection on grid resolution and artificial resistivity would strengthen reproducibility claims.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary and significance assessment of the dissertation, as well as the recommendation for minor revision. No specific major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The manuscript is a dissertation presenting results from GRMHD and GRRT numerical simulations of accretion flows in Kerr, loop-quantum, and binary spacetimes. All central claims (flares from reconnection, precession in tilted disks, photon-ring modifications from quantum corrections, and binary light-curve features) are framed explicitly as simulation outputs rather than analytical derivations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or results justified solely by self-citation. No equations, ansatzes, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the supplied text that would reduce any claimed result to its own inputs by construction; the work is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks such as EHT observations.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 1 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides insufficient detail to populate a complete ledger; entries are limited to explicit high-level mentions with no quantitative parameters or derivations available.

invented entities (1)
  • regular loop-quantum black holes
    purpose: Spacetime model incorporating quantum-gravity corrections for accretion simulations
    Mentioned in abstract as a target for simulations leading to EHT constraints; no independent evidence or falsifiable details supplied in the abstract.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of GRMHD and GRRT Simulations of Black Hole Accretion: Flares, Precession, and Complex Spacetimes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XK3ZU643

@misc{pith2026260619320,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: GRMHD and GRRT Simulations of Black Hole Accretion: Flares, Precession, and Complex Spacetimes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XK3ZU643}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.19320}
}
read the original abstract

This dissertation studies the electromagnetic signatures of accreting supermassive black holes using general relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulations and covariant radiative-transfer calculations. It develops a unified numerical framework for modeling black-hole accretion, jet launching, flaring activity, and multi-band variability in Kerr, non-Kerr, and binary black-hole spacetimes. For isolated Kerr black holes, I investigate how magnetic-field geometry affects accretion dynamics and transient emission. Multi-loop magnetic configurations naturally produce reconnection events and flux-rope structures that can power near-infrared flares from Sagittarius A*, while the evolving optical depth of expanding plasma explains delayed millimeter emission. I also show that in tilted magnetically arrested disks, magnetic torques can drive retrograde disk and jet precession. The dissertation then applies the same framework to more complex spacetimes. Simulations of accretion onto regular loop-quantum black holes show that quantum-gravity corrections can modify photon-ring size, polarization structure, and jet power, leading to observational constraints from Event Horizon Telescope data. Finally, simulations of supermassive binary black holes in time-dependent spacetimes reveal how gravitational self-lensing, shock activity, and spin-orbit coupling shape multi-wavelength light curves and jet precession. Together, these results connect relativistic plasma dynamics with current and future observations of black-hole systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

291 extracted references · 265 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole

    Akiyama K, et al. First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole[J/OL]. Astrophys. J. Lett., 2019, 875: L1. arXiv: 1906 . 11238 [astro-ph.GA]. DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7

  2. [2]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, Akiyama K, Alberdi A, et al. First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way[J/OL]. ApJ, 2022, 930(2): L12. DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac6674

  3. [3]

    First Light for GRAVITY: Phase Referencing Optical Interferometry for the Very Large Telescope Interferometer

    GRA VITY Collaboration, Abuter R, Accardo M, et al. First light for GRA VITY : Phase refer- encing optical interferometry for the Very Large Telescope Interferometer[J/OL]. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2017, 602: A94. arXiv: 1705.02345 [astro-ph.IM]. DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361 /201730838

  4. [4]

    2020, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 638, 1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202037717

    Abuter R, Amorim A, Bauböck M, et al. The flux distribution of Sgr A[J/OL]. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2020, 638: 1-12. arXiv: 2004.07185. DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202037717

  5. [6]

    , 2018, A&A, 618, L10

    GRA VITY Collaboration, Abuter, R., Amorim, A., et al. Detection of orbital motions near the last stable circular orbit of the massive black hole SgrA*[J/OL]. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2018, 618: L10. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201834294. DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834294

  6. [7]

    Flaring activity of sgr A*: Expanding hot blobs [J/OL]

    Yusef-Zadeh F, Wardle M, Roberts D A, et al. Flaring activity of sgr A*: Expanding hot blobs [J/OL]. International Conference Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, RANLP, 2006: 1-10. arXiv: 0612156 [astro-ph]. DOI: 10.22323/1.033.0051

  7. [8]

    P., et al

    Witzel G, Martinez G, Willner S P, et al. Rapid Variability of Sgr A* across the Electromagnetic Spectrum[J/OL]. The Astrophysical Journal, 2021, 917(2): 73 [2023-01-12]. https://dx.doi.org/1 0.3847/1538-4357/ac0891. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0891

  8. [9]

    Observational Constraints on Black Hole Spin

    Reynolds C S. Observational Constraints on Black Hole Spin[J/OL]. ARA&A, 2021, 59: 117-154. arXiv: 2011.08948 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-astro-112420-035022

Show all 291 references
  1. [10]

    Lense-Thirring precession after a supermas- sive black hole disrupts a star[J/OL]

    Pasham D R, Zajaček M, Nixon C J, et al. Lense-Thirring precession after a supermas- sive black hole disrupts a star[J/OL]. Nature, 2024, 630(8016): 325-328. arXiv: 2402 . 09689 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07433-w

  2. [11]

    Formation of precessing jets by tilted black hole discs in 3D general relativistic MHD simulations[J/OL]

    Liska M, Hesp C, Tchekhovskoy A, et al. Formation of precessing jets by tilted black hole discs in 3D general relativistic MHD simulations[J/OL]. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 2018, 474(1): L81-L85. arXiv: 1707.06619. DOI: 10.1093/mnrasl/slx174

  3. [12]

    Precessing jet nozzle connecting to a spinning black hole in References๙ն࿐Ѱൖ࿐໊ં໓ M87[J/OL]

    Cui Y, Hada K, Kawashima T, et al. Precessing jet nozzle connecting to a spinning black hole in References๙ն࿐Ѱൖ࿐໊ં໓ M87[J/OL]. Nature, 2023, 621(7980): 711-715. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06479-6

  4. [13]

    Semiclassical loop quantum black hole[J/OL]

    Modesto L. Semiclassical loop quantum black hole[J/OL]. Int. J. Theor. Phys., 2010, 49: 1649-

  5. [14]

    DOI: 10.1007/s10773-010-0346-x

    arXiv: 0811.2196 [gr-qc]. DOI: 10.1007/s10773-010-0346-x

  6. [15]

    The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evi- dence for a Gravitational-wave Background[J/OL]

    Agazie G, Anumarlapudi A, Archibald A M, et al. The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evi- dence for a Gravitational-wave Background[J/OL]. ApJ, 2023, 951(1): L8. arXiv: 2306 . 16213 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/acdac6

  7. [16]

    HARM: A Numerical Scheme for General Relativistic Mag- netohydrodynamics[J/OL]

    Gammie C F, McKinney J C, Tóth G. HARM: A Numerical Scheme for General Relativistic Mag- netohydrodynamics[J/OL]. ApJ, 2003, 589(1): 444-457. arXiv:astro-ph/0301509 [astro-ph]. DOI: 10.1086/374594

  8. [17]

    Simulation of Magnetohydrodynamic Flows: A Constrained Transport Model[J/OL]

    Evans C R, Hawley J F. Simulation of Magnetohydrodynamic Flows: A Constrained Transport Model[J/OL]. The Astrophysical Journal, 1988, 332: 659. DOI: 10.1086/166684

  9. [18]

    KHARMA: Flexible, Portable Performance for GRMHD[J/OL]

    Prather B S. KHARMA: Flexible, Portable Performance for GRMHD[J/OL]. arXiv e-prints, 2024: arXiv:2408.01361. arXiv: 2408.01361 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2408.01361

  10. [19]

    RAPTOR: I

    Bronzwaer T, Davelaar J, Y ounsi Z, et al. RAPTOR: I. Time-dependent radiative transfer in arbi- trary spacetimes[J/OL]. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2018, 613: A2. arXiv: 1801.10452. https: //www.aanda.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201732149. DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201732149

  11. [20]

    Modelling the polarised emission from black holes on event horizon-scales[C/OL]//Asada K, de Gouveia Dal Pino E, Giroletti M, et al

    Y ounsi Z, Porth O, Mizuno Y, et al. Modelling the polarised emission from black holes on event horizon-scales[C/OL]//Asada K, de Gouveia Dal Pino E, Giroletti M, et al. Perseus in Sicily: From Black Hole to Cluster Outskirts: vol. 342. 2020: 9-12. arXiv: 1907 . 09196 [astro-p...

  12. [21]

    Bridging Scales in Black Hole Accretion and Feedback: Relativistic Jet Linking the Horizon to the Host Galaxy[J/OL]

    Cho H, Prather B S, Narayan R, et al. Bridging Scales in Black Hole Accretion and Feedback: Relativistic Jet Linking the Horizon to the Host Galaxy[J/OL]. The Astrophysical Journal, 2025, 995: 122. arXiv: 2507.17818. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae1fdb

  13. [22]

    Electron thermodynamics in GRMHD simula- tions of low-luminosity black hole accretion[J/OL]

    Ressler S M, Tchekhovskoy A, Quataert E, et al. Electron thermodynamics in GRMHD simula- tions of low-luminosity black hole accretion[J/OL]. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2015, 454(2): 1848-1870. eprint: https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/454/2/18 ...

  14. [23]

    Electron and Proton Heating in Transrelativistic Magnetic Reconnection[J/OL]

    Rowan M E, Sironi L, Narayan R. Electron and Proton Heating in Transrelativistic Magnetic Reconnection[J/OL]. The Astrophysical Journal, 2017, 850(1): 29. https://iopscience.iop.org/arti cle/10.3847/1538-4357/aa9380. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9380

  15. [24]

    Thermal disequilibration of ions and electrons by collisionless plasma turbulence[J/OL]

    Kawazura Y, Barnes M, Schekochihin A A. Thermal disequilibration of ions and electrons by collisionless plasma turbulence[J/OL]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 2019, 116(3): 771-776. arXiv: 1807.07702 [physics.plasm-ph]. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.181249111 6

  16. [25]

    General relativistic magnetohydrodynamical simula- tions of the jet in M 87[J/OL]

    Mos̈cibrodzka M, Falcke H, Shiokawa H. General relativistic magnetohydrodynamical simula- tions of the jet in M 87[J/OL]. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2016, 586: 1-15. arXiv: 1510.07243. DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526630. ๙ն࿐Ѱൖ࿐໊ં໓ References

  17. [27]

    Sgr A* X-ray flares from non-thermal particle acceleration in a magnetically arrested disc[J/OL]

    Scepi N, Dexter J, Begelman M C. Sgr A* X-ray flares from non-thermal particle acceleration in a magnetically arrested disc[J/OL]. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2022, 511(3): 3536-3547. arXiv: 2107.08056 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac337

  18. [28]

    Microphysical Plasma Relations from Special- relativistic Turbulence[J/OL]

    Meringolo C, Cruz-Osorio A, Rezzolla L, et al. Microphysical Plasma Relations from Special- relativistic Turbulence[J/OL]. The Astrophysical Journal, 2023, 944(2): 122. arXiv: arXiv:2301 .02669v1. http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.02669. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/acaefe

  19. [30]

    Gravitational Radiation from Post-Newtonian Sources and Inspiralling Compact Bi- naries[J/OL]

    Blanchet L. Gravitational Radiation from Post-Newtonian Sources and Inspiralling Compact Bi- naries[J/OL]. Living Reviews in Relativity, 2014, 17(1): 2. arXiv: 1310.1528 [gr-qc]. DOI: 10.12942/lrr-2014-2

  20. [31]

    Spinning gravitating objects in the effective field theory in the post-Newtonian scheme[J/OL]

    Levi M, Steinhoff J. Spinning gravitating objects in the effective field theory in the post-Newtonian scheme[J/OL]. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2015, 2015: 219. arXiv: 1501.04956 [gr-qc]. DOI: 10.1007/JHEP09(2015)219

  21. [32]

    T wo-temperature GRMHD simulations of black hole accretion flows with multiple magnetic loops[J/OL]

    Jiang H X, Mizuno Y, Fromm C M, et al. T wo-temperature GRMHD simulations of black hole accretion flows with multiple magnetic loops[J/OL]. MNRAS, 2023, 522(2): 2307-2324. arXiv: 2304.06230 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stad1106

  22. [33]

    Hot accretion flows around black holes[J/OL]

    Yuan F, Narayan R. Hot accretion flows around black holes[J/OL]. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2014, 52: 529-588. arXiv: 1401.0586. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-1 41003

  23. [34]

    Nuclear activity in nearby galaxies.[J/OL]

    Ho L C. Nuclear activity in nearby galaxies.[J/OL]. The Annual Review of Astronomy and As- trophysics, 2008, 46: 475-539. arXiv: 0803.2268 [astro-ph]. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.astro.45 .051806.110546

  24. [35]

    Radiatively inefficient accretion in nearby galaxies[J/OL]

    Ho L C. Radiatively inefficient accretion in nearby galaxies[J/OL]. Astrophysical Journal, 2009, 699(1): 626-637. arXiv: 0906.4104. DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/626

  25. [36]

    An Unambiguous Detection of Faraday Rotation in Sagittarius A*[J/OL]

    Marrone D P, Moran J M, Zhao J H, et al. An Unambiguous Detection of Faraday Rotation in Sagittarius A*[J/OL]. The Astrophysical Journal, 2007, 654(1): L57-L60. arXiv: 0611791 [astro-ph]. DOI: 10.1086/510850

  26. [37]

    Evidence for a jet and outflow from Sgr A∗: A con- tinuum and spectral line study[J/OL]

    Yusef-Zadeh F, Royster M, Wardle M, et al. Evidence for a jet and outflow from Sgr A∗: A con- tinuum and spectral line study[J/OL]. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2020, 499(3): 3909-3931. arXiv: 2008.04317. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa2399. References๙ն࿐Ѱൖ࿐໊ં໓

  27. [38]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, Akiyama K, Alberdi A, et al. First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. V . Physical Origin of the Asymmetric Ring[J/OL]. ApJ, 2019, 875(1): L5. arXiv: 1906.11242 [astro-ph.GA]. DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab0f43

  28. [39]

    State-of-the-art energetic and morphological mod- elling of the launching site of the M87 jet[J/OL]

    Cruz-Osorio A, Fromm C M, Mizuno Y, et al. State-of-the-art energetic and morphological mod- elling of the launching site of the M87 jet[J/OL]. Nature Astronomy, 2021. arXiv: 2111.02517. DOI: 10.1038/s41550-021-01506-w

  29. [40]

    The Accretion Flow in M87 is Really MAD[J/OL]

    Yuan F, Wang H, Y ang H. The Accretion Flow in M87 is Really MAD[J/OL]. The Astrophysical Journal, 2022, 924(2): 124. arXiv: 2201.00512 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac 4714

  30. [42]

    Ab Initio Horizon-scale Simulations of Magnetically Arrested Accretion in Sagittarius A* Fed by Stellar Winds[J/OL]

    Ressler S M, White C J, Quataert E, et al. Ab Initio Horizon-scale Simulations of Magnetically Arrested Accretion in Sagittarius A* Fed by Stellar Winds[J/OL]. The Astrophysical Journal Let- ters, 2020, 896(1): L6. arXiv: 2006.00005. http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab9532 ...

  31. [44]

    The surprisingly small impact of magnetic fields on the inner accretion flow of Sagittarius A* fueled by stellar winds[J/OL]

    Ressler S M, Quataert E, Stone J M. The surprisingly small impact of magnetic fields on the inner accretion flow of Sagittarius A* fueled by stellar winds[J/OL]. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2019, 492(3): 3272-3293. eprint: https://academic.oup.com/mnras/...

  32. [45]

    Detection of a 20-min time lag observed from Sgr A* between 8 and 10 GHz with the VLA[J/OL]

    Michail J M, Yusef-Zadeh F, Wardle M. Detection of a 20-min time lag observed from Sgr A* between 8 and 10 GHz with the VLA[J/OL]. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2021, 505(3): 3616-3623. arXiv: 2105.11473. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab1529

  33. [47]

    Flares in the Galactic Centre - I

    Porth O, Mizuno Y, Y ounsi Z, et al. Flares in the Galactic Centre - I. Orbiting flux tubes in mag- netically arrested black hole accretion discs[J/OL]. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2021, 502(2): 2023-2032. arXiv: 2006.03658 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1093/mn...

  34. [48]

    Black Hole Flares: Ejection of Accreted Magnetic Flux through 3D Plasmoid-mediated Reconnection[J/OL]

    Ripperda B, Liska M, Chatterjee K, et al. Black Hole Flares: Ejection of Accreted Magnetic Flux through 3D Plasmoid-mediated Reconnection[J/OL]. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 2022, 924(2): L32. arXiv: 2109.15115 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac46a1

  35. [49]

    Electromagnetic extraction of energy from Kerr black holes[J/OL]

    Blandford R D, Znajek R L. Electromagnetic extraction of energy from Kerr black holes[J/OL]. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 1977, 179(3): 433-456. https://academic.ou p.com/mnras/article/179/3/433/962905. DOI: 10.1093/MNRAS/179.3.433

  36. [50]

    GRMHD simulations of magnetized advection- dominated accretion on a non-spinning black hole: Role of outflows[J/OL]

    Narayan R, Sadowski A, Penna R F, et al. GRMHD simulations of magnetized advection- dominated accretion on a non-spinning black hole: Role of outflows[J/OL]. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2012, 426(4): 3241-3259. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22002.x

  37. [51]

    Plasmoid formation in global GRMHD simulations and AGN flares[J/OL]

    Nathanail A, Fromm C M, Porth O, et al. Plasmoid formation in global GRMHD simulations and AGN flares[J/OL]. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2020, 495(2): 1549-1565. arXiv: 2002.01777. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa1165

  38. [52]

    GRMHD simulations of BH activation by small scale magnetic loops: Formation of striped jets and active coronae[J/OL]

    Chashkina A, Bromberg O, Levinson A. GRMHD simulations of BH activation by small scale magnetic loops: Formation of striped jets and active coronae[J/OL]. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2021, 508(1): 1241-1252. arXiv: 2106.15738. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab2 513

  39. [53]

    Magnetic reconnection and plasmoid formation in three-dimensional accretion flows around black holes[J/OL]

    Nathanail A, Mpisketzis V, Porth O, et al. Magnetic reconnection and plasmoid formation in three-dimensional accretion flows around black holes[J/OL]. Monthly Notices of the Royal As- tronomical Society, 2022, 513(3): 4267-4277. arXiv: 2111.03689 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1 093/m...

  40. [54]

    Modeling the orbital motion of Sgr A*’s near-infrared flares[J/OL]

    GRA VITY Collaboration, Bauböck M, Dexter J, et al. Modeling the orbital motion of Sgr A*’s near-infrared flares[J/OL]. A&A, 2020, 635: A143. arXiv: 2002.08374 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937233

  41. [55]

    Magnetic field structure in the vicinity of a supermassive black hole in low-luminosity galaxies: the case of Sgr A*[J/OL]

    Nathanail A, Dhang P, Fromm C M. Magnetic field structure in the vicinity of a supermassive black hole in low-luminosity galaxies: the case of Sgr A*[J/OL]. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2022, 513(4): 5204-5210. arXiv: 2205 . 12287 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1...

  42. [56]

    Orbital motion near Sagittarius A

    Wielgus M, Moscibrodzka M, Vos J, et al. Orbital motion near Sagittarius A . Constraints from polarimetric ALMA observations[J/OL]. A&A, 2022, 665: L6. arXiv: 2209 . 09926 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244493

  43. [57]

    Nonthermal Electrons in Radiatively Inefficient Accretion Flow Models of Sagittarius A*[J/OL]

    Yuan F, Quataert E, Narayan R. Nonthermal Electrons in Radiatively Inefficient Accretion Flow Models of Sagittarius A*[J/OL]. The Astrophysical Journal, 2003, 598(1): 301-312. arXiv: 0304 125 [astro-ph]. DOI: 10.1086/378716

  44. [58]

    A magnetohydrodynamical model for the formation of episodic jets [J/OL]

    Yuan F, Lin J, Wu K, et al. A magnetohydrodynamical model for the formation of episodic jets [J/OL]. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2009, 395(4): 2183-2188. arXiv: 0811.2893. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14673.x

  45. [59]

    Blob formation and ejection from the radiative inefficient accretion References๙ն࿐Ѱൖ࿐໊ં໓ flow around massive black hole[J/OL]

    Zhao T L, Yuan Y F, Kumar R. Blob formation and ejection from the radiative inefficient accretion References๙ն࿐Ѱൖ࿐໊ં໓ flow around massive black hole[J/OL]. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2020, 499(2): 1561-1577. arXiv: 2010.10863 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1093...

  46. [60]

    Formation of Episodic Jets and Associated Flares from Black Hole Accretion Systems[J/OL]

    Čemeljić M, Y ang H, Yuan F, et al. Formation of Episodic Jets and Associated Flares from Black Hole Accretion Systems[J/OL]. The Astrophysical Journal, 2022, 933(1): 55. arXiv: 2205.10531 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac70cc

  47. [61]

    General relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulations of the jet formation and large-scale propagation from black hole accretion systems[J/OL]

    McKinney J C. General relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulations of the jet formation and large-scale propagation from black hole accretion systems[J/OL]. MNRAS, 2006, 368(4): 1561-

  48. [62]

    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10256.x

    arXiv: astro-ph/0603045 [astro-ph]. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10256.x

  49. [63]

    Parabolic Jets from the Spinning Black Hole in M87[J/OL]

    Nakamura M, Asada K, Hada K, et al. Parabolic Jets from the Spinning Black Hole in M87[J/OL]. ApJ, 2018, 868(2): 146. arXiv: 1810.09963. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaeb2d

  50. [64]

    Accelerating AGN jets to parsec scales using gen- eral relativistic MHD simulations[J/OL]

    Chatterjee K, Liska M, Tchekhovskoy A, et al. Accelerating AGN jets to parsec scales using gen- eral relativistic MHD simulations[J/OL]. MNRAS, 2019, 490(2): 2200-2218. arXiv: 1904.03243 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz2626

  51. [65]

    Coexistence of Plasmoid and Kelvin-Helmholtz Instabil- ities in Collisionless Plasma Turbulence[J/OL]

    Borgogno D, Grasso D, Achilli B, et al. Coexistence of Plasmoid and Kelvin-Helmholtz Instabil- ities in Collisionless Plasma Turbulence[J/OL]. ApJ, 2022, 929(1): 62. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357 /ac582f

  52. [66]

    Plasmoid Instability in Forming Current Sheets[J/OL]

    Comisso L, Lingam M, Huang Y, et al. Plasmoid Instability in Forming Current Sheets[J/OL]. ApJ, 2017, 850(2): 142. arXiv: 1707.01862 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa97 89

  53. [67]

    The black hole accretion code[J/OL]

    Porth O, Olivares H, Mizuno Y, et al. The black hole accretion code[J/OL]. Computational As- trophysics and Cosmology, 2017, 4(1): 1-42. arXiv: 1611.09720. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s406 68-017-0020-2 . DOI: 10.1186/s40668-017-0020-2

  54. [68]

    Constrained transport and adaptive mesh refinement in the Black Hole Accretion Code[J/OL]

    Olivares H, Porth O, Davelaar J, et al. Constrained transport and adaptive mesh refinement in the Black Hole Accretion Code[J/OL]. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2019, 629: 1-21. arXiv: 1906.1

  55. [69]

    DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935559

  56. [70]

    Relativistic fluid disks in orbit around Kerr black holes.[J/OL]

    Fishbone L G, Moncrief V. Relativistic fluid disks in orbit around Kerr black holes.[J/OL]. The Astrophysical Journal, 1976, 207: 962-976. DOI: 10.1086/154565

  57. [71]

    Relativistic Hydrodynamics[M/OL]

    Rezzolla L, Zanotti O. Relativistic Hydrodynamics[M/OL]. Oxford University Press, 2013. https ://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198528906.001.0001 . DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198528 906.001.0001

  58. [72]

    The role of electron heating physics in images and variability of the Galactic Centre black hole Sagittarius A*[J/OL]

    Chael A, Rowan M, Narayan R, et al. The role of electron heating physics in images and variability of the Galactic Centre black hole Sagittarius A*[J/OL]. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronom- ical Society, 2018, 478(4): 5209-5229. arXiv: 1804.06416. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty1261

  59. [73]

    Temperature properties in magnetized and radiatively cooled two-temperature accretion flows on to a black hole[J/OL]

    Dihingia I K, Mizuno Y, Fromm C M, et al. Temperature properties in magnetized and radiatively cooled two-temperature accretion flows on to a black hole[J/OL]. MNRAS, 2023, 518(1): 405-

  60. [74]

    DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac3165

    arXiv: 2206.13184 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac3165

  61. [75]

    The Event Horizon General Relativistic Magnetohydro- ๙ն࿐Ѱൖ࿐໊ં໓ References dynamic Code Comparison Project[J/OL]

    Porth O, Chatterjee K, Narayan R, et al. The Event Horizon General Relativistic Magnetohydro- ๙ն࿐Ѱൖ࿐໊ં໓ References dynamic Code Comparison Project[J/OL]. The Astrophysical Journals, 2019, 243(2): 26. arXiv: 1904.04923 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab29fd

  62. [76]

    Efficient generation of jets from magnetically ar- rested accretion on a rapidly spinning black hole: Jets from magnetically arrested BH accre- tion[J/OL]

    Tchekhovskoy A, Narayan R, McKinney J C. Efficient generation of jets from magnetically ar- rested accretion on a rapidly spinning black hole: Jets from magnetically arrested BH accre- tion[J/OL]. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 2011, 418(1): L79-L8...

  63. [77]

    The Role of Strong Magnetic Fields in Stabilizing Highly Luminous Thin Disks[J/OL]

    Mishra B, Fragile P C, Anderson J, et al. The Role of Strong Magnetic Fields in Stabilizing Highly Luminous Thin Disks[J/OL]. ApJ, 2022, 939(1): 31. arXiv:2209.03317 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac938b

  64. [78]

    Plasmoid and Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities in Sweet-Parker current sheets[J/OL]

    Loureiro N F, Schekochihin A A, Uzdensky D A. Plasmoid and Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities in Sweet-Parker current sheets[J/OL]. 2012. arXiv: 1208.0966v1

  65. [79]

    Blob Formation and Ejection in Coronal Jets due to the Plasmoid and Kelvin⚶Helmholtz Instabilities[J/OL]

    Ni L, Zhang Q M, Murphy N A, et al. Blob Formation and Ejection in Coronal Jets due to the Plasmoid and Kelvin⚶Helmholtz Instabilities[J/OL]. The Astrophysical Journal, 2017, 841(1): 27. arXiv: 1705.00180. http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa6ffe. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6ff e

  66. [80]

    Scikit-image: Image processing in python [J/OL]

    Van Der Walt S, Schönberger J L, Nunez-Iglesias J, et al. Scikit-image: Image processing in python [J/OL]. PeerJ, 2014, 2014(1): e453. https://peerj.com/articles/453 . DOI: 10.7717/PEERJ.453/FI G-5

  67. [81]

    Fast reconnection in high-Lundquist-number plasmas due to the plasmoid Instability[J/OL]

    Bhattacharjee A, Huang Y M, Y ang H, et al. Fast reconnection in high-Lundquist-number plasmas due to the plasmoid Instability[J/OL]. Physics of Plasmas, 2009, 16(11): 112102. arXiv: 0906.55 99 [physics.plasm-ph]. DOI: 10.1063/1.3264103

  68. [82]

    T wo-temperature GRRMHD Simulations of M87 [J/OL]

    Ryan B R, Ressler S M, Dolence J C, et al. T wo-temperature GRRMHD Simulations of M87 [J/OL]. The Astrophysical Journal, 2018, 864(2): 126. arXiv: 1808.01958. http://dx.doi.org/10.3 847/1538-4357/aad73a. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad73a

  69. [83]

    Spectral and imaging properties of Sgr A∗ from high- resolution 3D GRMHD simulations with radiative cooling[J/OL]

    Y oon D, Chatterjee K, Markoff S B, et al. Spectral and imaging properties of Sgr A∗ from high- resolution 3D GRMHD simulations with radiative cooling[J/OL]. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2020, 499(3): 3178-3192. arXiv: 2009.14227. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa3 031

  70. [84]

    Dynamics and emission properties of flux ropes from two-temperature GRMHD simulations with multiple magnetic loops[J/OL]

    Jiang H X, Mizuno Y, Dihingia I K, et al. Dynamics and emission properties of flux ropes from two-temperature GRMHD simulations with multiple magnetic loops[J/OL]. A&A, 2024, 688: A82. arXiv: 2404.03237 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449681

  71. [85]

    Accretion Power in Astrophysics: Third Edition[M]

    Frank J, King A, Raine D J. Accretion Power in Astrophysics: Third Edition[M]. 2002

  72. [86]

    The Galactic Center massive black hole and nuclear star cluster[J/OL]

    Genzel R, Eisenhauer F, Gillessen S. The Galactic Center massive black hole and nuclear star cluster[J/OL]. Reviews of Modern Physics, 2010, 82(4): 3121-3195. arXiv: 1006 . 0064 [astro-ph.GA]. DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.3121

  73. [87]

    Galactic center research: manifestations of the central black References๙ն࿐Ѱൖ࿐໊ં໓ hole[J/OL]

    Morris M R, Meyer L, Ghez A M. Galactic center research: manifestations of the central black References๙ն࿐Ѱൖ࿐໊ં໓ hole[J/OL]. Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2012, 12(8): 995-1020. arXiv: 1207.6755 [astro-ph.GA]. DOI: 10.1088/1674-4527/12/8/007

  74. [88]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, Akiyama K, Alberdi A, et al. First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. II. EHT and Multiwavelength Observations, Data Processing, and Calibration[J/OL]. ApJ, 2022, 930(2): L13. DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac6675

  75. [89]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, Akiyama K, Alberdi A, et al. First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. III. Imaging of the Galactic Center Supermassive Black Hole[J/OL]. ApJ, 2022, 930(2): L14. DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac6429

  76. [90]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, Akiyama K, Alberdi A, et al. First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. IV . Variability, Morphology, and Black Hole Mass[J/OL]. ApJ, 2022, 930(2): L15. arXiv: 2311.08697 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac6736

  77. [91]

    A mcoronal-mass-ejection’ model for flares in Sagittarius A*[J/OL]

    Lin X, Li Y P, Yuan F. A mcoronal-mass-ejection’ model for flares in Sagittarius A*[J/OL]. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2023, 520(1): 1271-1284. arXiv: 2301.0592

  78. [92]

    DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stad176

    http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.05925. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stad176

  79. [93]

    Unprecedented Near-infrared Brightness and Variability of Sgr A*[J/OL]

    Do T, Witzel G, Gautam A K, et al. Unprecedented Near-infrared Brightness and Variability of Sgr A*[J/OL]. The Astrophysical Journal, 2019, 882(2): L27. http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/2041-82 13/ab38c3. DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab38c3

  80. [94]

    General relativistic effects and the near-infrared and X-ray variability of Sgr A∗I[J/OL]

    Von Fellenberg S D, Witzel G, Bauböck M, et al. General relativistic effects and the near-infrared and X-ray variability of Sgr A∗I[J/OL]. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2023, 669(45575): 1-14. arXiv: 2301.02558. http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.02558. DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245575

  81. [95]

    Orbital Polarimetric Tomography of a Flare Near the Sagittarius A* Supermassive Black Hole[J/OL]

    Levis A, Chael A A, Bouman K L, et al. Orbital Polarimetric Tomography of a Flare Near the Sagittarius A* Supermassive Black Hole[J/OL]. 2023, 2017. arXiv: 2310.07687. http://arxiv.org /abs/2310.07687

  82. [96]

    Magnetic reconnection plasmoid model for Sagittarius A* flares[J/OL]

    Aimar N, Dmytriiev A, Vincent F H, et al. Magnetic reconnection plasmoid model for Sagittarius A* flares[J/OL]. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 2023, 62. arXiv: 2301.11874. DOI: 10.1051/0004- 6361/202244936

  83. [97]

    Reconnection-driven flares in 3D black hole magnetospheres – A scenario for hot spots around Sagittarius A*[J/OL]

    Mellah I E, Cerutti B, Crinquand B. Reconnection-driven flares in 3D black hole magnetospheres – A scenario for hot spots around Sagittarius A*[J/OL]. 2023. arXiv: 2305.01689. http://arxiv.or g/abs/2305.01689

  84. [98]

    General Relativistic Magnetohydrodynamics Mean- Field Dynamos[J/OL]

    Del Zanna L, Tomei N, Franceschetti K, et al. General Relativistic Magnetohydrodynamics Mean- Field Dynamos[J/OL]. Fluids, 2022, 7(2): 1-15. DOI: 10.3390/fluids7020087

  85. [99]

    Magnetohydrodynamic Accretion ⚶Ejection: Jets Launched by a Nonisotropic Accretion-disk Dynamo

    Mattia G, Fendt C. Magnetohydrodynamic Accretion ⚶Ejection: Jets Launched by a Nonisotropic Accretion-disk Dynamo. II. A Dynamo Tensor Defined by the Disk Coriolis Number[J/OL]. The Astrophysical Journal, 2020, 900(1): 60. http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538- 4357/aba9d6 . DOI: 10....

  86. [100]

    Jets from Accretion Disk Dynamos: Consistent Quenching Modes for Dynamo and Resistivity[J/OL]

    Mattia G, Fendt C. Jets from Accretion Disk Dynamos: Consistent Quenching Modes for Dynamo and Resistivity[J/OL]. The Astrophysical Journal, 2022, 935(1): 22. arXiv: 2207.00811. http://dx ๙ն࿐Ѱൖ࿐໊ં໓ References .doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac7d59. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7d59

  87. [101]

    Helical and non-helical large-scale dynamos in thin accretion discs[J/OL]

    Zhou H. Helical and non-helical large-scale dynamos in thin accretion discs[J/OL]. MNRAS, 2024, 527(2): 3018-3028. arXiv: 2309.15565 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stad340 6

  88. [102]

    Impact of non-thermal particles on the spec- tral and structural properties of M87[J/OL]

    Fromm C M, Cruz-Osorio A, Mizuno Y, et al. Impact of non-thermal particles on the spec- tral and structural properties of M87[J/OL]. A&A, 2022, 660: A107. arXiv: 2111 . 02518 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142295

  89. [103]

    General relativistic radiative transfer: formulation and emis- sion from structured tori around black holes[J/OL]

    Y ounsi Z, Wu K, Fuerst S V. General relativistic radiative transfer: formulation and emis- sion from structured tori around black holes[J/OL]. A&A, 2012, 545: A13. arXiv: 1207 . 4234 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219599

  90. [104]

    Flares in the Galactic Centre II: polarisation signa- tures of flares at mm-wavelengths[J/OL]

    Najafi-Ziyazi M, Davelaar J, Mizuno Y, et al. Flares in the Galactic Centre II: polarisation signa- tures of flares at mm-wavelengths[J/OL]. arXiv e-prints, 2023: arXiv:2308.16740. arXiv: 2308.1 6740 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2308.16740

  91. [105]

    What really makes an accretion disc MAD[J/OL]

    Begelman M C, Scepi N, Dexter J. What really makes an accretion disc MAD[J/OL]. MNRAS, 2022, 511: 2040-2051. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab3790. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab3790

  92. [106]

    Assessing Quantitative Results in Accretion Simulations: From Local to Global[J/OL]

    Hawley J F, Guan X, Krolik J H. Assessing Quantitative Results in Accretion Simulations: From Local to Global[J/OL]. ApJ, 2011, 738(1): 84. arXiv: 1103.5987 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1 088/0004-637X/738/1/84

  93. [107]

    Numerical calculation of magnetobremsstrahlung emission and absorption coefficients[J/OL]

    Leung P K, Gammie C F, Noble S C. Numerical calculation of magnetobremsstrahlung emission and absorption coefficients[J/OL]. Astrophysical Journal, 2011, 737(1). DOI: 10.1088/0004-637 X/737/1/21

  94. [108]

    Flaring Activity of SgrA*: Adiabatic Expansion of Nonthermal Plasma[C]//American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts: American Astro- nomical Society Meeting Abstracts: vol

    Yusef-Zadeh F, Wardle M, Roberts D A, et al. Flaring Activity of SgrA*: Adiabatic Expansion of Nonthermal Plasma[C]//American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts: American Astro- nomical Society Meeting Abstracts: vol. 209. 2006: 112.07

  95. [109]

    TIME-DEPENDENT MODELS OF FLARES FROM SAGITTARIUS A*[J/OL]

    Dodds-Eden K, Sharma P, Quataert E, et al. TIME-DEPENDENT MODELS OF FLARES FROM SAGITTARIUS A*[J/OL]. The Astrophysical Journal, 2010, 725(1): 450 [2023-01-12]. https://d x.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/725/1/450. DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/725/1/450

  96. [110]

    Impact of non-thermal electron radiation effects on the horizon scale image structure of Sagittarius A∗[J/OL]

    Zhao S S, Huang L, Lu R S, et al. Impact of non-thermal electron radiation effects on the horizon scale image structure of Sagittarius A∗[J/OL]. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Soci- ety, 2023, 519(1): 340-351 [2023-01-12]. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS...

  97. [111]

    Polarimetry and astrometry of NIR flares as event horizon scale, dynamical probes for the mass of Sgr A[J/OL]

    Abuter R, Aimar N, Amaro Seoane P, et al. Polarimetry and astrometry of NIR flares as event horizon scale, dynamical probes for the mass of Sgr A[J/OL]. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 2023, 677: 1-10. arXiv: 2307.11821. http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.11821. DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/20234 7416

  98. [112]

    The Physical Origin and Time Lag of Multifrequency Flares from Sgr A*[J/OL]

    Jiang H X, Mizuno Y, Dihingia I K, et al. The Physical Origin and Time Lag of Multifrequency Flares from Sgr A*[J/OL]. ApJ, 2025, 990(1): 81. arXiv: 2507.12789 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: References๙ն࿐Ѱൖ࿐໊ં໓ 10.3847/1538-4357/adf1e5

  99. [113]

    Rapid X-ray flaring from the direction of the supermassive black hole at the Galactic Centre[J/OL]

    Baganoff F K, Bautz M W, Brandt W N, et al. Rapid X-ray flaring from the direction of the supermassive black hole at the Galactic Centre[J/OL]. Nature, 2001, 413(6851): 45-48. arXiv: astro-ph/0109367 [astro-ph]. DOI: 10.1038/35092510

  100. [114]

    Near-infrared flares from accreting gas around the supermas- sive black hole at the Galactic Centre[J/OL]

    Genzel R, Schödel R, Ott T, et al. Near-infrared flares from accreting gas around the supermas- sive black hole at the Galactic Centre[J/OL]. Nature, 2003, 425(6961): 934-937. arXiv: 0310821 [astro-ph]. DOI: 10.1038/nature02065

  101. [115]

    The mean infrared emission of Sagittarius A*[J/OL]

    Schödel R, Morris M R, Muzic K, et al. The mean infrared emission of Sagittarius A*[J/OL]. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2011, 532: 1-14. DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116994

  102. [116]

    Continuation of the X-ray monitoring of Sgr A∗: The increase in bright flaring rate confirmed[J/OL]

    Mossoux E, Finociety B, Beckers J M, et al. Continuation of the X-ray monitoring of Sgr A∗: The increase in bright flaring rate confirmed[J/OL]. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2020, 636: 1-15. arXiv: 2003.06191. DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937136

  103. [117]

    Second-scale Submillimeter Variability of Sagittarius A* during Flaring Activity of 2019: On the Origin of Bright Near-infrared Flares[J/OL]

    Murchikova L, Witzel G. Second-scale Submillimeter Variability of Sagittarius A* during Flaring Activity of 2019: On the Origin of Bright Near-infrared Flares[J/OL]. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 2021, 920(1): L7. arXiv: 2107.11391 . http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/2041- 8213/a...

  104. [118]

    Astrophysics First light for GRA VITY : Phase referencing optical interferometry for the Very Large Telescope Interferometer[J]

    Abuter G C R, Accardo M, Amorim A, et al. Astrophysics First light for GRA VITY : Phase referencing optical interferometry for the Very Large Telescope Interferometer[J]. 2017, 94: 1-23

  105. [119]

    Submillimeter and radio variability of Sagittarius A∗: A statistical analysis[J/OL]

    Subroweit M, García-Marín M, Eckart A, et al. Submillimeter and radio variability of Sagittarius A∗: A statistical analysis[J/OL]. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2017, 601: 1-13. DOI: 10.1051/0 004-6361/201628530

  106. [120]

    The flare activity of Sagittarius A*

    Eckart A, Baganoff F K, Schödel R, et al. The flare activity of Sagittarius A*. New coordi- nated mm to X-ray observations[J/OL]. A&A, 2006, 450(2): 535-555. arXiv: astro- ph/0512440 [astro-ph]. DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20054418

  107. [121]

    Variability of Sagittarius A*: Flares at 1 Millimeter [J/OL]

    Zhao J H, Y oung K H, Herrnstein R M, et al. Variability of Sagittarius A*: Flares at 1 Millimeter [J/OL]. ApJ, 2003, 586(1): L29-L32. arXiv: astro-ph/0302062 [astro-ph]. DOI: 10.1086/37 4581

  108. [122]

    A Multiwavelength Study of Sgr A*: The Role of Near-IR Flares in Production of X-Ray, Soft 𝛾-Ray, and Submillimeter Emission[J/OL]

    Yusef-Zadeh F, Bushouse H, Dowell C D, et al. A Multiwavelength Study of Sgr A*: The Role of Near-IR Flares in Production of X-Ray, Soft 𝛾-Ray, and Submillimeter Emission[J/OL]. ApJ, 2006, 644(1): 198-213. arXiv: astro-ph/0510787 [astro-ph]. DOI: 10.1086/503287

  109. [123]

    NIR triggered observations of Sgr A∗ at 43 GHz[J/OL]

    Rauch C, Ros E, Krichbaum T P, et al. NIR triggered observations of Sgr A∗ at 43 GHz[J/OL]. Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union, 2016, 11: 52-53. DOI: 10.1017/S1743921 316012321

  110. [124]

    The Nature of the 10 kilosecond X-ray flare in Sgr A*[J/OL]

    Markoff S, Falcke H, Yuan F, et al. The Nature of the 10 kilosecond X-ray flare in Sgr A*[J/OL]. A&A, 2001, 379: L13-L16. arXiv: astro-ph/0109081 [astro-ph]. DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361: 20011346

  111. [125]

    Simultaneous NIR/sub-mm observation of flare emis- ๙ն࿐Ѱൖ࿐໊ં໓ References sion from Sagittarius A*[J/OL]

    Eckart A, Schödel R, García-Marín M, et al. Simultaneous NIR/sub-mm observation of flare emis- ๙ն࿐Ѱൖ࿐໊ં໓ References sion from Sagittarius A*[J/OL]. A&A, 2008, 492(2): 337-344. arXiv: 0811.2753 [astro-ph]. DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:200810924

  112. [126]

    On the Nature of the Variable Infrared Emission from Sagittarius A*[J/OL]

    Yuan F, Quataert E, Narayan R. On the Nature of the Variable Infrared Emission from Sagittarius A*[J/OL]. ApJ, 2004, 606(2): 894-899. arXiv: astro-ph/0401429 [astro-ph]. DOI: 10.1086 /383117

  113. [127]

    Transient jet formation and state transitions from large- scale magnetic reconnection in black hole accretion discs[J/OL]

    Dexter J, McKinney J C, Markoff S, et al. Transient jet formation and state transitions from large- scale magnetic reconnection in black hole accretion discs[J/OL]. MNRAS, 2014, 440(3): 2185-

  114. [128]

    DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu581

    arXiv: 1312.1691 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu581

  115. [129]

    A powerful flare from Sgr A* confirms the synchrotron nature of the X-ray emission[J/OL]

    Ponti G, George E, Scaringi S, et al. A powerful flare from Sgr A* confirms the synchrotron nature of the X-ray emission[J/OL]. MNRAS, 2017, 468(2): 2447-2468. arXiv: 1703 . 03410 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx596

  116. [130]

    Non-thermal models for infrared flares from Sgr A*[J/OL]

    Petersen E, Gammie C. Non-thermal models for infrared flares from Sgr A*[J/OL]. MNRAS, 2020, 494(4): 5923-5935. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa826

  117. [131]

    General relativistic MHD simulations of non- thermal flaring in Sagittarius A*[J/OL]

    Chatterjee K, Markoff S, Neilsen J, et al. General relativistic MHD simulations of non- thermal flaring in Sagittarius A*[J/OL]. MNRAS, 2021, 507(4): 5281-5302. arXiv: 2011.08904 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab2466

  118. [132]

    The Effects of Tilt on the Time Variability of Millimeter and Infrared Emis- sion from Sagittarius A*[J/OL]

    White C J, Quataert E. The Effects of Tilt on the Time Variability of Millimeter and Infrared Emis- sion from Sagittarius A*[J/OL]. ApJ, 2022, 926(2): 136. arXiv: 2104.12896 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac423c

  119. [133]

    Reconnection and particle acceleration in interacting flux ropes - I

    Ripperda B, Porth O, Xia C, et al. Reconnection and particle acceleration in interacting flux ropes - I. Magnetohydrodynamics and test particles in 2.5D[J/OL]. Monthly Notices of the Royal As- tronomical Society, 2017, 467(3): 3279-3298. arXiv: 1611.09966. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx379

  120. [134]

    The Relationship Between Simulated Sub-Millimeter and Near- Infrared Images of Sagittarius A* from a Magnetically Arrested Black Hole Accretion Flow [J/OL]

    Avetis Grigorian A, Dexter J. The Relationship Between Simulated Sub-Millimeter and Near- Infrared Images of Sagittarius A* from a Magnetically Arrested Black Hole Accretion Flow [J/OL]. arXiv e-prints, 2024: arXiv:2404.10982. arXiv: 2404.10982 [astro-ph.HE]

  121. [135]

    Magnetic flux eruptions at the root of time lags in low-luminosity active galactic nuclei[J/OL]

    Vos J, Davelaar J, Olivares H, et al. Magnetic flux eruptions at the root of time lags in low-luminosity active galactic nuclei[J/OL]. A&A, 2024, 689: A112. arXiv: 2310 . 16938 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449265

  122. [136]

    Magnetically arrested disk flux eruption events to describe SgrA* flares[J/OL]

    Antonopoulou E, Loules A, Nathanail A. Magnetically arrested disk flux eruption events to describe SgrA* flares[J/OL]. arXiv e-prints, 2025: arXiv:2501.07521. arXiv: 2501 . 07521 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2501.07521

  123. [137]

    Revisiting flares in Sagittarius A* based on general relativistic magnetohydro- dynamic numerical simulations of black hole accretion[J/OL]

    Lin X, Yuan F. Revisiting flares in Sagittarius A* based on general relativistic magnetohydro- dynamic numerical simulations of black hole accretion[J/OL]. Monthly Notices of the Royal As- tronomical Society, 2024, 531(3): 3136-3150. eprint: https : / / academic . oup . com / ...

  124. [138]

    Flares from plasmoids and current References๙ն࿐Ѱൖ࿐໊ં໓ sheets around Sgr A*[J/OL]

    Dimitropoulos I, Nathanail A, Petropoulou M, et al. Flares from plasmoids and current References๙ն࿐Ѱൖ࿐໊ં໓ sheets around Sgr A*[J/OL]. arXiv e-prints, 2024: arXiv:2407.14312. arXiv: 2407 . 14312 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2407.14312

  125. [139]

    Large-scale poloidal magnetic field dynamo leads to pow- erful jets in GRMHD simulations of black hole accretion with toroidal field[J/OL]

    Liska M, Tchekhovskoy A, Quataert E. Large-scale poloidal magnetic field dynamo leads to pow- erful jets in GRMHD simulations of black hole accretion with toroidal field[J/OL]. MNRAS, 2020, 494(3): 3656-3662. arXiv: 1809.04608 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa955

  126. [140]

    Striped Jets in Post-Neutron Star Merger Systems [J/OL]

    Kaufman E, Christie I M, Lalakos A, et al. Striped Jets in Post-Neutron Star Merger Systems [J/OL]. ApJ, 2023, 954(1): 40. arXiv: 2212.06058 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.3847/1538-435 7/ace894

  127. [141]

    Large-scale Evolution of Seconds-long Relativistic Jets from Black Hole-Neutron Star Mergers[J/OL]

    Gottlieb O, Issa D, Jacquemin-Ide J, et al. Large-scale Evolution of Seconds-long Relativistic Jets from Black Hole-Neutron Star Mergers[J/OL]. ApJ, 2023, 954(1): L21. arXiv: 2306.14947 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/aceeff

  128. [142]

    Evolution of the Magnetic Field in High- and Low- 𝛽 Disks with Initially Toroidal Fields[J/OL]

    Rodman P E, Reynolds C S. Evolution of the Magnetic Field in High- and Low- 𝛽 Disks with Initially Toroidal Fields[J/OL]. ApJ, 2024, 960(2): 97. arXiv: 2309 . 07953 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0384

  129. [143]

    The Influence of Accretion Disk Thickness on the Large-scale Magnetic Dynamo[J/OL]

    Hogg J D, Reynolds C S. The Influence of Accretion Disk Thickness on the Large-scale Magnetic Dynamo[J/OL]. ApJ, 2018, 861(1): 24. arXiv: 1805.05372 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.3847/1 538-4357/aac439

  130. [144]

    Wind-fed GRMHD simulations of Sagittarius A*: tilt and alignment of jets and accretion discs, electron thermodynamics, and multiscale mod- elling of the rotation measure[J/OL]

    Ressler S M, White C J, Quataert E. Wind-fed GRMHD simulations of Sagittarius A*: tilt and alignment of jets and accretion discs, electron thermodynamics, and multiscale mod- elling of the rotation measure[J/OL]. MNRAS, 2023, 521(3): 4277-4298. arXiv: 2303 . 15503 [astro-ph.HE...

  131. [145]

    Black hole jets without large-scale net magnetic flux

    Parfrey K, Giannios D, Beloborodov A M. Black hole jets without large-scale net magnetic flux. [J/OL]. MNRAS, 2015, 446: L61-L65. arXiv: 1410.0374 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1093/mn rasl/slu162

  132. [146]

    Black hole magnetosphere with small-scale flux tubes - II

    Yuan Y, Spitkovsky A, Blandford R D, et al. Black hole magnetosphere with small-scale flux tubes - II. Stability and dynamics[J/OL]. MNRAS, 2019, 487(3): 4114-4127. arXiv: 1901.02834 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz1599

  133. [147]

    Black hole magnetosphere with small-scale flux tubes [J/OL]

    Yuan Y, Blandford R D, Wilkins D R. Black hole magnetosphere with small-scale flux tubes [J/OL]. MNRAS, 2019, 484(4): 4920-4932. arXiv: 1810.02475 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.10 93/mnras/stz332

  134. [148]

    Striped Blandford/Znajek jets from advection of small- scale magnetic field[J/OL]

    Mahlmann J F, Levinson A, Aloy M A. Striped Blandford/Znajek jets from advection of small- scale magnetic field[J/OL]. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2020, 494(3): 4203-4225. arXiv: 2001.03171. DOI: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAA943

  135. [149]

    Accreting Neutron Stars in 3D General-relativistic Magnetohydro- dynamic Simulations: Jets, Magnetic Polarity, and the Interchange Slingshot[J/OL]

    Parfrey K, Tchekhovskoy A. Accreting Neutron Stars in 3D General-relativistic Magnetohydro- dynamic Simulations: Jets, Magnetic Polarity, and the Interchange Slingshot[J/OL]. ApJ, 2024, 975(1): 57. arXiv: 2311.04291 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad737b

  136. [150]

    Magnetorotational dynamo can generate large- ๙ն࿐Ѱൖ࿐໊ં໓ References scale vertical magnetic fields in 3D GRMHD simulations of accreting black holes[J/OL]

    Jacquemin-Ide J, Rincon F, Tchekhovskoy A, et al. Magnetorotational dynamo can generate large- ๙ն࿐Ѱൖ࿐໊ં໓ References scale vertical magnetic fields in 3D GRMHD simulations of accreting black holes[J/OL]. MN- RAS, 2024, 532(2): 1522-1545. arXiv: 2311.00034 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10...

  137. [151]

    Magnetically Driven Accretion Flows in the Kerr Metric

    Hirose S, Krolik J H, De Villiers J P, et al. Magnetically Driven Accretion Flows in the Kerr Metric. II. Structure of the Magnetic Field[J/OL]. ApJ, 2004, 606(2): 1083-1097. arXiv: astro-ph /0311500 [astro-ph]. DOI: 10.1086/383184

  138. [152]

    Particle Acceleration and the Origin of X-Ray Flares in GRMHD Simulations of SGR A[J/OL]

    Ball D, Özel F, Psaltis D, et al. Particle Acceleration and the Origin of X-Ray Flares in GRMHD Simulations of SGR A[J/OL]. ApJ, 2016, 826(1): 77. arXiv: 1602 . 05968 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.3847/0004-637X/826/1/77

  139. [153]

    Updated Transfer Coefficients for Magnetized Plas- mas[J/OL]

    Marszewski A, Prather B S, Joshi A V, et al. Updated Transfer Coefficients for Magnetized Plas- mas[J/OL]. The Astrophysical Journal, 2021, 921(1): 17. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1b28

  140. [154]

    A geometric distance measurement to the Galactic center black hole with 0.3% uncertainty[J/OL]

    Abuter R, Amorim A, Bauböck M, et al. A geometric distance measurement to the Galactic center black hole with 0.3% uncertainty[J/OL]. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 2019, 625: L10.https://www .aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2019/05/aa35656-19/aa35656-19.html%20https://www.aanda.o ...

  141. [155]

    Modelling energetic particles by a relativistic kappa-loss-cone distribution function in plasmas[J/OL]

    Xiao F. Modelling energetic particles by a relativistic kappa-loss-cone distribution function in plasmas[J/OL]. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 2006, 48(2): 203-213. DOI: 10.1088/074 1-3335/48/2/003

  142. [156]

    Modeling non-thermal emission from the jet-launching region of M 87 with adaptive mesh refinement[J/OL]

    Davelaar J, Olivares H, Porth O, et al. Modeling non-thermal emission from the jet-launching region of M 87 with adaptive mesh refinement[J/OL]. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2019, 632:

  143. [157]

    https://www.aanda.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936150

    arXiv: 1906.10065. https://www.aanda.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936150. DOI: 10.1051/0 004-6361/201936150

  144. [158]

    Polarized Synchrotron Emissivities and Absorptivities for Relativistic Thermal, Power-Law, and Kappa Distribution Functions[J/OL]

    Pandya A, Zhang Z, Chandra M, et al. Polarized Synchrotron Emissivities and Absorptivities for Relativistic Thermal, Power-Law, and Kappa Distribution Functions[J/OL]. The Astrophysical Journal, 2016, 822(1): 34. arXiv: 1602.08749. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/00...

  145. [159]

    General relativistic magnetohydrodynam- ical 𝜅-jet models for Sagittarius A*[J/OL]

    Davelaar J, Mościbrodzka M, Bronzwaer T, et al. General relativistic magnetohydrodynam- ical 𝜅-jet models for Sagittarius A*[J/OL]. A&A, 2018, 612: A34. arXiv: 1712 . 02266 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201732025

  146. [160]

    Simultaneous Chandra, CSO, and VLA Observations of Sgr A*: The Nature of Flaring Activity[J/OL]

    Yusef-Zadeh F, Wardle M, Heinke C, et al. Simultaneous Chandra, CSO, and VLA Observations of Sgr A*: The Nature of Flaring Activity[J/OL]. ApJ, 2008, 682(1): 361-372. arXiv: 0712.2882 [astro-ph]. DOI: 10.1086/588803

  147. [161]

    Multiwavelength Observations of Sgr A*

    Michail J M, Yusef-Zadeh F, Wardle M, et al. Multiwavelength Observations of Sgr A*. II. 2019 July 21 and 26[J/OL]. ApJ, 2024, 971(1): 52. arXiv: 2406.01671 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.3 847/1538-4357/ad5332

  148. [162]

    Enhanced Blandford Znajek jet in loop quantum black hole [J/OL]

    Jiang H X, Dihingia I K, Liu C, et al. Enhanced Blandford Znajek jet in loop quantum black hole [J/OL]. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2024, 2024(05): 101. https://dx.doi.org References๙ն࿐Ѱൖ࿐໊ં໓ /10.1088/1475-7516/2024/05/101. DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2024/05/101

  149. [163]

    Millimeter to X-ray flares from Sagittarius A*[J/OL]

    Eckart A, García-Marín M, Vogel S N, et al. Millimeter to X-ray flares from Sagittarius A*[J/OL]. A&A, 2012, 537: A52. DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117779

  150. [164]

    Using infrared/X-ray flare statistics to probe the emission regions near the event horizon of Sgr A*[J/OL]

    Dibi S, Markoff S, Belmont R, et al. Using infrared/X-ray flare statistics to probe the emission regions near the event horizon of Sgr A*[J/OL]. MNRAS, 2016, 461(1): 552-559. arXiv: 1606.0 6567 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw1353

  151. [165]

    iharm3D: Vectorized General Relativistic Magnetohydro- dynamics[J/OL]

    Prather B, Wong G, Dhruv V, et al. iharm3D: Vectorized General Relativistic Magnetohydro- dynamics[J/OL]. The Journal of Open Source Software, 2021, 6(66): 3336. arXiv: 2110.10191 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.21105/joss.03336

  152. [166]

    Parthenon – a performance portable block-structured adaptive mesh refinement framework[J/OL]

    Grete P, Dolence J C, Miller J M, et al. Parthenon – a performance portable block-structured adaptive mesh refinement framework[J/OL]. arXiv e-prints, 2022: arXiv:2202.12309. arXiv: 220 2.12309 [cs.DC]. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2202.12309

  153. [167]

    Kokkos 3: Programming Model Extensions for the Exascale Era[J/OL]

    Trott C R, Lebrun-Grandié D, Arndt D, et al. Kokkos 3: Programming Model Extensions for the Exascale Era[J/OL]. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 2022, 33(4): 805-

  154. [168]

    DOI: 10.1109/TPDS.2021.3097283

  155. [169]

    An unsplit Godunov method for ideal MHD via constrained trans- port[J/OL]

    Gardiner T A, Stone J M. An unsplit Godunov method for ideal MHD via constrained trans- port[J/OL]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2005, 205(2): 509-539. arXiv: astro-ph/0501557 [astro-ph]. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2004.11.016

  156. [170]

    An unsplit Godunov method for ideal MHD via constrained transport in three dimensions[J/OL]

    Gardiner T A, Stone J M. An unsplit Godunov method for ideal MHD via constrained transport in three dimensions[J/OL]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2008, 227(8): 4123-4141. arXiv: 0712.2634 [astro-ph]. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2007.12.017

  157. [171]

    Multizone Modeling of Black Hole Accretion and Feedback in 3D GRMHD: Bridging Vast Spatial and Temporal Scales[J/OL]

    Cho H, Prather B S, Su K Y, et al. Multizone Modeling of Black Hole Accretion and Feedback in 3D GRMHD: Bridging Vast Spatial and Temporal Scales[J/OL]. ApJ, 2024, 977(2): 200. arXiv: 2405.13887 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad9561

  158. [172]

    General relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simu- lations of magnetically choked accretion flows around black holes[J/OL]

    McKinney J C, Tchekhovskoy A, Blandford R D. General relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simu- lations of magnetically choked accretion flows around black holes[J/OL]. MNRAS, 2012, 423(4): 3083-3117. arXiv: 1201.4163 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21074.x

  159. [173]

    The disc-jet symbiosis emerges: modelling the emission of Sagittarius A* with electron thermodynamics[J/OL]

    Ressler S M, Tchekhovskoy A, Quataert E, et al. The disc-jet symbiosis emerges: modelling the emission of Sagittarius A* with electron thermodynamics[J/OL]. MNRAS, 2017, 467(3): 3604-

  160. [174]

    DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx364

    arXiv: 1611.09365 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx364

  161. [175]

    Anatomy of the Sagittarius A complex

    Zylka R, Mezger P G, Ward-Thompson D, et al. Anatomy of the Sagittarius A complex. IV . SGR A* and the Central Cavity revisited.[J/OL]. A&A, 1995, 297: 83-97. arXiv: astro- ph/9410086 [astro-ph]. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9410086

  162. [176]

    Simultaneous Multiwavelength Observations of Sagittarius A* [J/OL]

    An T, Goss W M, Zhao J H, et al. Simultaneous Multiwavelength Observations of Sagittarius A* [J/OL]. ApJ, 2005, 634(1): L49-L52. arXiv: astro-ph/0503527 [astro-ph]. DOI: 10.1086/49 8687

  163. [177]

    Radio and Millimeter Monitoring of Sgr A*: Spectrum, ๙ն࿐Ѱൖ࿐໊ં໓ References Variability, and Constraints on the G2 Encounter[J/OL]

    Bower G C, Markoff S, Dexter J, et al. Radio and Millimeter Monitoring of Sgr A*: Spectrum, ๙ն࿐Ѱൖ࿐໊ં໓ References Variability, and Constraints on the G2 Encounter[J/OL]. ApJ, 2015, 802(1): 69. arXiv: 1502.065 34 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/802/1/69

  164. [178]

    ALMA and VLA Measurements of Frequency-Dependent Time Lags in Sagit- tarius A*: Evidence for a Relativistic Outflow[C]//Iono D, Tatematsu K, Wootten A, et al

    Brinkerink C D. ALMA and VLA Measurements of Frequency-Dependent Time Lags in Sagit- tarius A*: Evidence for a Relativistic Outflow[C]//Iono D, Tatematsu K, Wootten A, et al. As- tronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series: Revolution in Astronomy with ALMA: The Third ...

  165. [179]

    ALMA Observations of the Terahertz Spectrum of Sagittarius A*[J/OL]

    Bower G C, Dexter J, Asada K, et al. ALMA Observations of the Terahertz Spectrum of Sagittarius A*[J/OL]. ApJ, 2019, 881(1): L2. arXiv: 1907.08319 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.3847/2041-8 213/ab3397

  166. [180]

    Mass-scaling as a method to constrain outflows and particle acceleration from low-luminosity accreting black holes[J/OL]

    Connors R M T, Markoff S, Nowak M A, et al. Mass-scaling as a method to constrain outflows and particle acceleration from low-luminosity accreting black holes[J/OL]. MNRAS, 2017, 466(4): 4121-4137. arXiv: 1612.00953 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw3150

  167. [181]

    A radio-emitting outflow in the quiescent state of A0620-00: implications for modelling low-luminosity black hole binaries[J/OL]

    Gallo E, Fender R P, Miller-Jones J C A, et al. A radio-emitting outflow in the quiescent state of A0620-00: implications for modelling low-luminosity black hole binaries[J/OL]. MNRAS, 2006, 370(3): 1351-1360. arXiv: astro-ph/0605376 [astro-ph]. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.1 0560.x

  168. [182]

    The Spectral Energy Distribution of Quiescent Black Hole X-Ray Binaries: New Constraints from Spitzer[J/OL]

    Gallo E, Migliari S, Markoff S, et al. The Spectral Energy Distribution of Quiescent Black Hole X-Ray Binaries: New Constraints from Spitzer[J/OL]. ApJ, 2007, 670(1): 600-609. arXiv: 0707 .0028 [astro-ph]. DOI: 10.1086/521524

  169. [183]

    Modeling the inner part of the jet in M87: Confronting jet morphology with theory[J/OL]

    Y ang H, Yuan F, Li H, et al. Modeling the inner part of the jet in M87: Confronting jet morphology with theory[J/OL]. Science Advances, 2024, 10(12). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adn3544

  170. [184]

    Is AGN Variability Correlated with Other AGN Properties? ZDCF Analysis of Small Samples of Sparse Light Curves[C/OL]//Maoz D, Sternberg A, Leibowitz E M

    Alexander T. Is AGN Variability Correlated with Other AGN Properties? ZDCF Analysis of Small Samples of Sparse Light Curves[C/OL]//Maoz D, Sternberg A, Leibowitz E M. Astrophysics and Space Science Library: Astronomical Time Series: vol. 218. 1997: 163. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-0 1...

  171. [185]

    Time series analysis

    Box G E P, Jenkins G M. Time series analysis. Forecasting and control[C]. 1976

  172. [186]

    The correct estimate of the probability of false detection of the matched filter in weak-signal detection problems

    Vio R, Andreani P, Biggs A, et al. The correct estimate of the probability of false detection of the matched filter in weak-signal detection problems. III. Peak distribution method versus the Gumbel distribution method[J/OL]. A&A, 2019, 627: A103. arXiv:1907.01465 [astro-ph.IM...

  173. [187]

    Copula-based algorithm for generating bursty time series [J/OL]

    Jo H H, Lee B H, Hiraoka T, et al. Copula-based algorithm for generating bursty time series [J/OL]. Physical Review E, 2019, 100(2): 022307. arXiv: 1904.08795 [physics.soc-ph]. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.100.022307

  174. [188]

    Magnetically Driven Retrograde Precession in Mis- aligned Black Hole Accretion Flows[J/OL]

    Jiang H X, Mizuno Y, Lai D, et al. Magnetically Driven Retrograde Precession in Mis- aligned Black Hole Accretion Flows[J/OL]. ApJ, 2025, 995(1): 112. arXiv: 2507 . 13680 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae19ee

  175. [189]

    Most Supermassive Black Holes Must Be Rapidly Rotating References๙ն࿐Ѱൖ࿐໊ં໓ [J/OL]

    Elvis M, Risaliti G, Zamorani G. Most Supermassive Black Holes Must Be Rapidly Rotating References๙ն࿐Ѱൖ࿐໊ં໓ [J/OL]. ApJ, 2002, 565(2): L75-L77. arXiv: astro-ph/0112413 [astro-ph]. DOI: 10.1086/33 9197

  176. [190]

    What Is the Black Hole Spin in Cyg X-1?[J/OL]

    Zdziarski A A, Chand S, Banerjee S, et al. What Is the Black Hole Spin in Cyg X-1?[J/OL]. ApJ, 2024, 967(1): L9. arXiv: 2402.12325 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad43ed

  177. [191]

    The Extreme Spin of the Black Hole in Cygnus X-1 [J/OL]

    Gou L, McClintock J E, Reid M J, et al. The Extreme Spin of the Black Hole in Cygnus X-1 [J/OL]. ApJ, 2011, 742(2): 85. arXiv: 1106.3690 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X /742/2/85

  178. [192]

    The spin of the black hole microquasar XTE J1550- 564 via the continuum-fitting and Fe-line methods[J/OL]

    Steiner J F, Reis R C, McClintock J E, et al. The spin of the black hole microquasar XTE J1550- 564 via the continuum-fitting and Fe-line methods[J/OL]. MNRAS, 2011, 416(2): 941-958. arXiv: 1010.1013 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19089.x

  179. [193]

    Models of high-frequency quasi-periodic oscillations and black hole spin estimates in Galactic microquasars[J/OL]

    Kotrlová A, Šrámková E, Török G, et al. Models of high-frequency quasi-periodic oscillations and black hole spin estimates in Galactic microquasars[J/OL]. A&A, 2020, 643: A31. arXiv: 2008.1 2963 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937097

  180. [194]

    Black Hole Spin-Orbit Misalignment in Galactic X- ray Binaries[J/OL]

    Fragos T, Tremmel M, Rantsiou E, et al. Black Hole Spin-Orbit Misalignment in Galactic X- ray Binaries[J/OL]. ApJ, 2010, 719(1): L79-L83. arXiv: 1001 . 1107 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/719/1/L79

  181. [195]

    Black hole spin ⚶orbit misalignment in the x- ray binary MAXI J1820+070[J/OL]

    Poutanen J, Veledina A, Berdyugin A V, et al. Black hole spin ⚶orbit misalignment in the x- ray binary MAXI J1820+070[J/OL]. Science, 2022, 375(6583): 874-876. arXiv: 2109 . 07511 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1126/science.abl4679

  182. [196]

    Über die Wirkung rotierender ferner Massen in der Einsteinschen Gravitationstheorie

    Thirring H. Über die Wirkung rotierender ferner Massen in der Einsteinschen Gravitationstheorie. [J]. Physikalische Zeitschrift, 1918, 19: 33

  183. [197]

    Black Hole Accretion[J/OL]

    Narayan R, Quataert E. Black Hole Accretion[J/OL]. Science, 2005, 307(5706): 77-80. DOI: 10 .1126/science.1105746

  184. [198]

    The origin of spin in binary black holes

    Bavera S S, Fragos T, Qin Y, et al. The origin of spin in binary black holes. Predicting the distri- butions of the main observables of Advanced LIGO[J/OL]. A&A, 2020, 635: A97. arXiv: 1906.1 2257 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936204

  185. [199]

    Hydrodynamic Simulations of Tilted Thick-Disk Accretion onto a Kerr Black Hole[J/OL]

    Fragile P C, Anninos P. Hydrodynamic Simulations of Tilted Thick-Disk Accretion onto a Kerr Black Hole[J/OL]. The Astrophysical Journal, 2005, 623(1): 347-361. arXiv: astro- ph/0403356 [astro-ph]. DOI: 10.1086/428433

  186. [200]

    Global General Relativistic Magnetohydrodynamic Simulation of a Tilted Black Hole Accretion Disk[J/OL]

    Fragile P C, Blaes O M, Anninos P, et al. Global General Relativistic Magnetohydrodynamic Simulation of a Tilted Black Hole Accretion Disk[J/OL]. The Astrophysical Journal, 2007, 668(1): 417-429. arXiv: 0706.4303 [astro-ph]. DOI: 10.1086/521092

  187. [201]

    Disc tearing and Bardeen-Petterson alignment in GRMHD simulations of highly tilted thin accretion discs[J/OL]

    Liska M, Hesp C, Tchekhovskoy A, et al. Disc tearing and Bardeen-Petterson alignment in GRMHD simulations of highly tilted thin accretion discs[J/OL]. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2021, 507(1): 983-990. arXiv: 1904.08428 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10 .1093/mnras/staa099

  188. [202]

    Misaligned magnetized accretion flows onto spin- ๙ն࿐Ѱൖ࿐໊ં໓ References ning black holes: magneto-spin alignment, outflow power and intermittent jets[J/OL]

    Chatterjee K, Liska M, Tchekhovskoy A, et al. Misaligned magnetized accretion flows onto spin- ๙ն࿐Ѱൖ࿐໊ં໓ References ning black holes: magneto-spin alignment, outflow power and intermittent jets[J/OL]. 2023. arXiv: 2311.00432. http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.00432

  189. [203]

    Observations of SS 433[J/OL]

    Margon B. Observations of SS 433[J/OL]. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1984, 22: 507-536. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.aa.22.090184.002451

  190. [204]

    Precise mass and spin measurements for a stellar-mass black hole through X-ray timing: the case of GRO J1655-40[J/OL]

    Motta S E, Belloni T M, Stella L, et al. Precise mass and spin measurements for a stellar-mass black hole through X-ray timing: the case of GRO J1655-40[J/OL]. MNRAS, 2014, 437(3): 2554-

  191. [205]

    DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt2068

    arXiv: 1309.3652 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt2068

  192. [206]

    The precessing jets of <ASTROBJ>1E 1740.7- 2942</ASTROBJ>[J/OL]

    Luque-Escamilla P L, Martí J, Martínez-Aroza J. The precessing jets of <ASTROBJ>1E 1740.7- 2942</ASTROBJ>[J/OL]. A&A, 2015, 584: A122. arXiv: 1511.01425 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527238

  193. [207]

    Orbital and Superorbital Periods of 1E 1740.7-2942 and GRS 1758-258[J/OL]

    Smith D M, Heindl W A, Swank J H. Orbital and Superorbital Periods of 1E 1740.7-2942 and GRS 1758-258[J/OL]. ApJ, 2002, 578(2): L129-L132. arXiv: astro-ph/0209255 [astro-ph]. DOI: 10.1086/344701

  194. [208]

    Tidal disruption event discs around supermassive black holes: disc warp and inclination evolution[J/OL]

    Zanazzi J J, Lai D. Tidal disruption event discs around supermassive black holes: disc warp and inclination evolution[J/OL]. MNRAS, 2019, 487(4): 4965-4984. arXiv: 1902 . 09546 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz1610

  195. [209]

    Swift J1644+57 gone MAD: The case for dynamically important magnetic flux threading the black hole in a jetted tidal disruption event [J/OL]

    Tchekhovskoy A, Metzger B D, Giannios D, et al. Swift J1644+57 gone MAD: The case for dynamically important magnetic flux threading the black hole in a jetted tidal disruption event [J/OL]. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2014, 437(3): 2744-2760. http://aca ...

  196. [210]

    Lense-Thirring precession around supermassive black holes during tidal disruption events[J/OL]

    Franchini A, Lodato G, Facchini S. Lense-Thirring precession around supermassive black holes during tidal disruption events[J/OL]. MNRAS, 2016, 455(2): 1946-1956. arXiv: 1510 . 04879 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv2417

  197. [211]

    Observing Lense-Thirring Precession in Tidal Disruption Flares[J/OL]

    Stone N, Loeb A. Observing Lense-Thirring Precession in Tidal Disruption Flares[J/OL]. PRL, 2012, 108(6): 061302. arXiv: 1109.6660 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.0 61302

  198. [212]

    Tidal disruption discs formed and fed by stream-stream and stream-disc interactions in global GRHD simulations[J/OL]

    Andalman Z L, Liska M T, Tchekhovskoy A, et al. Tidal disruption discs formed and fed by stream-stream and stream-disc interactions in global GRHD simulations[J/OL]. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2022, 510(2): 1627-1648. arXiv: 2008.04922. DOI: 10.1093 /mn...

  199. [213]

    Evidence for a Geometrically Thick Self-Gravitating Accretion Disk in NGC 3079[J/OL]

    Kondratko P T, Greenhill L J, Moran J M. Evidence for a Geometrically Thick Self-Gravitating Accretion Disk in NGC 3079[J/OL]. The Astrophysical Journal, 2005, 618(2): 618-634. arXiv: astro-ph/0408549 [astro-ph]. DOI: 10.1086/426101

  200. [214]

    Bardeen-Petterson Effect and the Disk Structure of the Seyfert Galaxy NGC 1068[J/OL]

    Caproni A, Abraham Z, Mosquera Cuesta H J. Bardeen-Petterson Effect and the Disk Structure of the Seyfert Galaxy NGC 1068[J/OL]. The Astrophysical Journal, 2006, 638(1): 120-124. arXiv: astro-ph/0510276 [astro-ph]. DOI: 10.1086/498684. References๙ն࿐Ѱൖ࿐໊ં໓

  201. [215]

    Is the Bardeen-Petterson effect responsible for the warping and precession in NGC4258?[J/OL]

    Caproni A, Abraham Z, Livio M, et al. Is the Bardeen-Petterson effect responsible for the warping and precession in NGC4258?[J/OL]. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2007, 379(1): 135-142. arXiv: 0705.4035 [astro-ph]. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11918.x

  202. [216]

    The realignment of a black hole misaligned with its accretion disc[J/OL]

    Scheuer P A G, Feiler R. The realignment of a black hole misaligned with its accretion disc[J/OL]. MNRAS, 1996, 282: 291. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/282.1.291

  203. [217]

    The Lense-Thirring Effect and Accretion Disks around Kerr Black Holes[J/OL]

    Bardeen J M, Petterson J A. The Lense-Thirring Effect and Accretion Disks around Kerr Black Holes[J/OL]. The Astrophysical Journall, 1975, 195: L65. DOI: 10.1086/181711

  204. [218]

    Bardeen-Petterson alignment, jets, and magnetic trun- cation in GRMHD simulations of tilted thin accretion discs[J/OL]

    Liska M, Tchekhovskoy A, Ingram A, et al. Bardeen-Petterson alignment, jets, and magnetic trun- cation in GRMHD simulations of tilted thin accretion discs[J/OL]. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2019, 487(1): 550-561. arXiv: 1810.00883 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10 ...

  205. [219]

    Epicyclic Motions and Standing Shocks in Numerically Simulated Tilted Black Hole Accretion Disks[J/OL]

    Fragile P C, Blaes O M. Epicyclic Motions and Standing Shocks in Numerically Simulated Tilted Black Hole Accretion Disks[J/OL]. The Astrophysical Journal, 2008, 687(2): 757-766. arXiv: 08 07.2453 [astro-ph]. DOI: 10.1086/591936

  206. [220]

    Tilted Disks around Black Holes: A Numerical Parameter Survey for Spin and Inclination Angle[J/OL]

    White C J, Quataert E, Blaes O. Tilted Disks around Black Holes: A Numerical Parameter Survey for Spin and Inclination Angle[J/OL]. The Astrophysical Journal, 2019, 878(1): 51. arXiv: 1902 .09662 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab089e

  207. [221]

    Tilted Accretion Disks[J/OL]

    Fragile P C, Liska M. Tilted Accretion Disks[J/OL]. arXiv e-prints, 2024: arXiv:2404.10052. arXiv: 2404.10052 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.10052

  208. [222]

    Alignment of magnetized accretion disks and relativistic jets with spinning black holes[J/OL]

    McKinney J C, Tchekhovskoy A, Blandford R D. Alignment of magnetized accretion disks and relativistic jets with spinning black holes[J/OL]. Science, 2013, 339(6115): 49-52. arXiv: 1211.3

  209. [223]

    DOI: 10.1126/science.1230811

  210. [224]

    Electromagnetic versus Lense-Thirring alignment of black hole accre- tion discs[J/OL]

    Polko P, McKinney J C. Electromagnetic versus Lense-Thirring alignment of black hole accre- tion discs[J/OL]. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2017, 464(3): 2660-2671. arXiv: 1512.07969 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw1875

  211. [225]

    Magnetically modified spherical accretion in GRMHD: reconnection-driven convection and jet propagation[J/OL]

    Ressler S M, Quataert E, White C J, et al. Magnetically modified spherical accretion in GRMHD: reconnection-driven convection and jet propagation[J/OL]. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro- nomical Society, 2021, 504(4): 6076-6095. arXiv: 2102.01694 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.109 3...

  212. [226]

    Warping of Accretion Disks with Magnetically Driven Outflows: A Possible Origin for Jet Precession[J/OL]

    Lai D. Warping of Accretion Disks with Magnetically Driven Outflows: A Possible Origin for Jet Precession[J/OL]. The Astrophysical Journal, 2003, 591(2): L119-L122. arXiv: 0306012 [astro-ph]. DOI: 10.1086/377163

  213. [227]

    Magnetically Driven Warping, Precession, and Resonances in Accretion Disks[J/OL]

    Lai D. Magnetically Driven Warping, Precession, and Resonances in Accretion Disks[J/OL]. ApJ, 1999, 524(2): 1030-1047. arXiv: astro-ph/9904110 [astro-ph]. DOI: 10.1086/307850

  214. [228]

    A rapidly changing jet orientation in the stellar-mass black-hole system V404 Cygni[J/OL]

    Miller-Jones J C A, Tetarenko A J, Sivakoff G R, et al. A rapidly changing jet orientation in the stellar-mass black-hole system V404 Cygni[J/OL]. Nature, 2019, 569(7756): 374-377. arXiv: 1906.05400 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1152-0 . ๙ն࿐Ѱൖ࿐໊ં໓ References

  215. [229]

    PATOKA: Simulating Electromagnetic Observables of Black Hole Accretion[J/OL]

    Wong G N, Prather B S, Dhruv V, et al. PATOKA: Simulating Electromagnetic Observables of Black Hole Accretion[J/OL]. ApJS, 2022, 259(2): 64. arXiv: 2202 . 11721 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac582e

  216. [230]

    A Survey of General Relativistic Magnetohydrodynamic Models for Black Hole Accretion Systems[J/OL]

    Dhruv V, Prather B, Wong G N, et al. A Survey of General Relativistic Magnetohydrodynamic Models for Black Hole Accretion Systems[J/OL]. ApJS, 2025, 277(1): 16. arXiv: 2411 . 12647 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/adaea6

  217. [231]

    Global simulations of accretion disks

    Sorathia K A, Reynolds C S, Stone J M, et al. Global simulations of accretion disks. I. Convergence and comparisons with local models[J/OL]. Astrophysical Journal, 2012, 749(2). arXiv: 1106.401

  218. [232]

    DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/749/2/189

  219. [233]

    Shadows of loop quantum black holes: semi-analytical simulations of loop quantum gravity effects on Sagittarius A* and M87*[J/OL]

    Jiang H X, Liu C, Dihingia I K, et al. Shadows of loop quantum black holes: semi-analytical simulations of loop quantum gravity effects on Sagittarius A* and M87*[J/OL]. JCAP, 2024, 2024(1): 059. arXiv: 2312.04288 [gr-qc]. DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2024/01/059

  220. [234]

    The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment[J/OL]

    Will C M. The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment[J/OL]. Living Rev. Rel., 2014, 17: 4. arXiv: 1403.7377 [gr-qc]. DOI: 10.12942/lrr-2014-4

  221. [235]

    Discovery of a pulsar in a binary system[J/OL]

    Hulse R A, Taylor J H. Discovery of a pulsar in a binary system[J/OL]. Astrophys. J. Lett., 1975, 195: L51-L53. DOI: 10.1086/181708

  222. [236]

    Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger[J/OL]

    Abbott B P, et al. Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger[J/OL]. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2016, 116(6): 061102. arXiv: 1602.03837 [gr-qc]. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevL ett.116.061102

  223. [237]

    Selected topics in Planck scale physics[J/OL]

    Ng Y J. Selected topics in Planck scale physics[J/OL]. Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 2003, 18: 1073-1098. arXiv: gr-qc/0305019 [gr-qc]. DOI: 10.1142/S0217732303010934

  224. [238]

    Six easy roads to the Planck scale[J/OL]

    Adler R J. Six easy roads to the Planck scale[J/OL]. Am. J. Phys., 2010, 78: 925-932. arXiv: 1001.1205 [gr-qc]. DOI: 10.1119/1.3439650

  225. [239]

    Eternal inflation and the initial singularity[J/OL]

    Borde A, Vilenkin A. Eternal inflation and the initial singularity[J/OL]. Phys. Rev. Lett., 1994, 72: 3305-3309. arXiv: gr-qc/9312022 [gr-qc]. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.3305

  226. [240]

    Inflationary space-times are incompletein past directions[J/OL]

    Borde A, Guth A H, Vilenkin A. Inflationary space-times are incompletein past directions[J/OL]. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2003, 90: 151301. arXiv: gr-qc/0110012 [gr-qc]. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLet t.90.151301

  227. [241]

    The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time[M/OL]

    Hawking S W, Ellis G F R. The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time[M/OL]. Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2023. DOI: 10.1017/9781009253161

  228. [242]

    Axial gravitational quasinormal modes of a self-dual black hole in loop quantum gravity[J/OL]

    Y ang S, Guo W D, Tan Q, et al. Axial gravitational quasinormal modes of a self-dual black hole in loop quantum gravity[J/OL]. Phys. Rev. D, 2023, 108(2): 024055. arXiv: 2304.06895 [gr-qc]. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.024055

  229. [243]

    Self-dual Black Holes in LQG: Theory and Phenomenology [J/OL]

    Modesto L, Premont-Schwarz I. Self-dual Black Holes in LQG: Theory and Phenomenology [J/OL]. Phys. Rev. D, 2009, 80: 064041. arXiv: 0905. 3170 [hep-th]. DOI: 10. 1103 /PhysR evD.80.064041. References๙ն࿐Ѱൖ࿐໊ં໓

  230. [244]

    Gravitational lensing by self-dual black holes in loop quantum gravity[J/OL]

    Sahu S, Lochan K, Narasimha D. Gravitational lensing by self-dual black holes in loop quantum gravity[J/OL]. Phys. Rev. D, 2015, 91: 063001. arXiv: 1502.05619 [gr-qc]. DOI: 10.1103/Ph ysRevD.91.063001

  231. [245]

    Geometry of the black-to-white hole transition within a single asymp- totic region[J/OL]

    Han M, Rovelli C, Soltani F. Geometry of the black-to-white hole transition within a single asymp- totic region[J/OL]. Phys. Rev. D, 2023, 107(6): 064011. arXiv: 2302.03872 [gr-qc]. DOI: 10 .1103/PhysRevD.107.064011

  232. [246]

    Black Hole Evolution Traced Out with Loop Quantum Gravity[J]

    Rovelli C. Black Hole Evolution Traced Out with Loop Quantum Gravity[J]. APS Physics, 2018, 11: 127

  233. [247]

    A Status Report on the Phenomenology of Black Holes in Loop Quantum Gravity: Evaporation, Tunneling to White Holes, Dark Matter and Gravitational Waves[J]

    Barrau A, Martineau K, Moulin F. A Status Report on the Phenomenology of Black Holes in Loop Quantum Gravity: Evaporation, Tunneling to White Holes, Dark Matter and Gravitational Waves[J]. Universe, 2018, 4: 102

  234. [248]

    Black hole evaporation: A perspective from loop quantum gravity[J]

    Ashtekar A. Black hole evaporation: A perspective from loop quantum gravity[J]. Universe, 2021, 2: 6

  235. [249]

    Towards understanding of loop quantum black holes[J]

    Gan W C, Santos N O, Shu F W, et al. Towards understanding of loop quantum black holes[J]. Phys. Rev. D, 2020, 102: 124030

  236. [250]

    Entropy Production and Semiclassical Gravity[J]

    Dasgupta A. Entropy Production and Semiclassical Gravity[J]. SIGMA, 2013, 9: 013

  237. [251]

    Emission spectra of self-dual black holes[J/OL]

    Hossenfelder S, Modesto L, Premont-Schwarz I. Emission spectra of self-dual black holes[J/OL]. arXiv: 1202.0412 [gr-qc]

  238. [252]

    An overview of quasinormal modes in modified and extended gravity[J]

    Moulin F, Barrau A, Martineau K. An overview of quasinormal modes in modified and extended gravity[J]. Universe, 2019, 5: 202

  239. [253]

    Distortions of images of Schwarzschild lensing[J/OL]

    Virbhadra K S. Distortions of images of Schwarzschild lensing[J/OL]. Phys. Rev. D, 2022, 106(6): 064038. arXiv: 2204.01879 [gr-qc]. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.106.064038

  240. [254]

    Constraints on self-dual black hole in loop quantum gravity with S0-2 star in the galactic center[J/OL]

    Y an J M, Wu Q, Liu C, et al. Constraints on self-dual black hole in loop quantum gravity with S0-2 star in the galactic center[J/OL]. JCAP, 2022, 09: 008. arXiv: 2203.03203 [gr-qc]. DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2022/09/008

  241. [255]

    Periodic orbits and their gravitational wave radiations in a polymer black hole in loop quantum gravity[J/OL]

    Tu Z Y, Zhu T, Wang A. Periodic orbits and their gravitational wave radiations in a polymer black hole in loop quantum gravity[J/OL]. Phys. Rev. D, 2023, 108(2): 2. arXiv:2304.14160 [gr-qc]. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.024035

  242. [256]

    Primordial black holes in loop quantum cosmology: the effect on the threshold [J/OL]

    Papanikolaou T. Primordial black holes in loop quantum cosmology: the effect on the threshold [J/OL]. Class. Quant. Grav., 2023, 40(13): 134001. arXiv: 2301.11439 [gr-qc]. DOI: 10.1088 /1361-6382/acd97d

  243. [257]

    Observational tests of a quantum extension of Schwarzschild space- time in loop quantum gravity with stars in the Galactic Center[J/OL]

    Y an J M, Liu C, Zhu T, et al. Observational tests of a quantum extension of Schwarzschild space- time in loop quantum gravity with stars in the Galactic Center[J/OL]. Phys. Rev. D, 2023, 107(8): 084043. arXiv: 2302.10482 [gr-qc]. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.084043

  244. [259]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Akiyama K, et al. First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole[J/OL]. Astrophys. J., 2019, 875: L6. DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab1141

  245. [260]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Akiyama K, et al. First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. IV . Imaging the Central Supermas- sive Black Hole[J/OL]. Astrophys. J., 2019, 875(1): L4. arXiv: 1906.11241 [astro-ph.GA]. DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab0e85

  246. [262]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Akiyama K, et al. First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. Testing the Black Hole Metric[J/OL]. Astrophys. J. Lett., 2022, 930(2): L17. DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac6756

  247. [263]

    The Current Ability to Test Theories of Gravity with Black Hole Shadows[J/OL]

    Mizuno Y, Y ounsi Z, Fromm C M, et al. The Current Ability to Test Theories of Gravity with Black Hole Shadows[J/OL]. Nature Astron., 2018, 2(7): 585-590. arXiv: 1804 . 05812 [astro-ph.GA]. DOI: 10.1038/s41550-018-0449-5

  248. [265]

    Constraining the spin and the deformation parameters from the black hole shadow[J/OL]

    Tsukamoto N, Li Z, Bambi C. Constraining the spin and the deformation parameters from the black hole shadow[J/OL]. JCAP, 2014, 06: 043. arXiv: 1403.0371 [gr-qc]. DOI: 10.1088/147 5-7516/2014/06/043

  249. [266]

    Black hole shadow in an asymptotically-flat, stationary, and axisymmetric space- time: The Kerr-Newman and rotating regular black holes[J/OL]

    Tsukamoto N. Black hole shadow in an asymptotically-flat, stationary, and axisymmetric space- time: The Kerr-Newman and rotating regular black holes[J/OL]. Phys. Rev. D, 2018, 97(6): 064021. arXiv: 1708.07427 [gr-qc]. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.97.064021

  250. [267]

    Interferometric Imaging Directly with Clo- sure Phases and Closure Amplitudes[J/OL]

    Chael A A, Johnson M D, Bouman K L, et al. Interferometric Imaging Directly with Clo- sure Phases and Closure Amplitudes[J/OL]. Astrophys. J., 2018, 857(1): 23. arXiv: 1803.07088 [astro-ph.IM]. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aab6a8

  251. [268]

    Investigating Loop Quantum Gravity Through Strong Gravita- tional Lensing Effects by Rotating Black Hole and EHT Observations[J/OL]

    Kumar J, Islam S U, Ghosh S G. Investigating Loop Quantum Gravity Through Strong Gravita- tional Lensing Effects by Rotating Black Hole and EHT Observations[J/OL]. arXiv: 2305.04336 [gr-qc]

  252. [269]

    Probing the spacetime and accretion model for the Galactic Center: Comparison of Kerr and dilaton black hole shadows[J/OL]

    Röder J, Cruz-Osorio A, Fromm C M, et al. Probing the spacetime and accretion model for the Galactic Center: Comparison of Kerr and dilaton black hole shadows[J/OL]. Astron. Astrophys., 2023, 671: A143. arXiv: 2301.09549 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244866

  253. [270]

    The 2017 Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) observations of the central source in M87 have led to the first measurement of the size of a black-hole shadow

    Psaltis D, et al. The 2017 Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) observations of the central source in M87 have led to the first measurement of the size of a black-hole shadow. This observation offers a new and clean gravitational test of the black-hole metric in the strong-field regi...

  254. [271]

    Tests of Loop Quantum Gravity from the Event Horizon Tele- scope Results of Sgr A*[J/OL]

    Afrin M, Vagnozzi S, Ghosh S G. Tests of Loop Quantum Gravity from the Event Horizon Tele- scope Results of Sgr A*[J/OL]. Astrophys. J., 2023, 944(2): 149. arXiv: 2209.12584 [gr-qc]. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/acb334

  255. [272]

    Loop Quantum Cosmology with Complex Ashtekar Variables [J/OL]

    Ben Achour J, Grain J, Noui K. Loop Quantum Cosmology with Complex Ashtekar Variables [J/OL]. Class. Quant. Grav., 2015, 32: 025011. arXiv: 1407.3768 [gr-qc]. DOI: 10.1088/026 4-9381/32/2/025011

  256. [273]

    Black Hole Entropy in Loop Quantum Gravity, Analytic Continuation, and Dual Holog- raphy[Z/OL]

    Han M. Black Hole Entropy in Loop Quantum Gravity, Analytic Continuation, and Dual Holog- raphy[Z/OL]. arXiv: 1402.2084 [gr-qc]

  257. [274]

    A Note on Black Hole Entropy in Loop Quantum Gravity[J/OL]

    Carlip S. A Note on Black Hole Entropy in Loop Quantum Gravity[J/OL]. Class. Quant. Grav., 2015, 32(15): 155009. arXiv: 1410.5763 [gr-qc]. DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/32/15/155009

  258. [275]

    Black Hole Images as Tests of General Relativity: Effects of Plasma Physics[J/OL]

    Özel F, Psaltis D, Y ounsi Z. Black Hole Images as Tests of General Relativity: Effects of Plasma Physics[J/OL]. Astrophys. J., 2022, 941(1): 88. arXiv: 2111.01123 [gr-qc]. DOI: 10.3847/15 38-4357/ac9fcb

  259. [276]

    Black Hole Images as Tests of General Relativity: Effects of Spacetime Geometry[J/OL]

    Y ounsi Z, Psaltis D, Özel F. Black Hole Images as Tests of General Relativity: Effects of Spacetime Geometry[J/OL]. Astrophys. J., 2023, 942(1): 47. arXiv: 2111.01752 [gr-qc]. DOI: 10.3847 /1538-4357/aca58a

  260. [277]

    Probing the innermost accretion flow geometry of Sgr A* with Event Horizon Telescope[J/OL]

    Pu H Y, Broderick A E. Probing the innermost accretion flow geometry of Sgr A* with Event Horizon Telescope[J/OL]. Astrophys. J., 2018, 863: 148. arXiv: 1807.01817 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad086

  261. [278]

    ipole ⚶semi-analytic scheme for relativistic polarized radia- tive transport[J/OL]

    Moscibrodzka M, Gammie C F. ipole ⚶semi-analytic scheme for relativistic polarized radia- tive transport[J/OL]. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 2018, 475(1): 43-54. arXiv: 1712 . 03057 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx3162

  262. [279]

    Simulating the Emission and Outflows from Accretion Disks[J/OL]

    Noble S C, Leung P K, Gammie C F, et al. Simulating the Emission and Outflows from Accretion Disks[J/OL]. Class. Quant. Grav., 2007, 24: S259-S274. arXiv:astro-ph/0701778 [astro-ph]. DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/24/12/S17

  263. [280]

    Stringent axion constraints with Event Horizon Telescope polari- metric measurements of M87 [J/OL]

    Chen Y, Liu Y, Lu R S, et al. Stringent axion constraints with Event Horizon Telescope polari- metric measurements of M87 [J/OL]. Nature Astron., 2022, 6(5): 592-598. arXiv: 2105 . 04572 [hep-ph]. DOI: 10.1038/s41550-022-01620-3

  264. [281]

    RAPTOR: II

    Bronzwaer T, Y ounsi Z, Davelaar J, et al. RAPTOR: II. Polarized radiative transfer in curved spacetime[J/OL]. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2020, 641(2018). arXiv: 2007.03045. DOI: 10.1 ๙ն࿐Ѱൖ࿐໊ં໓ References 051/0004-6361/202038573

  265. [282]

    Akiyama K, Algaba J C, Alberdi A,֩First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VII. Polar- ization of the Ring[J/OL]. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 2021, 910(1): L12. DOI: 10.3847/2 041-8213/abe71d

  266. [283]

    Akiyama K, Algaba J C, Alberdi A,֩First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VIII. Mag- netic Field Structure near The Event Horizon[J/OL]. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 2021, 910(1): L13. DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/abe4de

  267. [284]

    Revisiting the radio interferometer measurement equation

    Smirnov O M. Revisiting the radio interferometer measurement equation. I. A full-sky Jones for- malism[J/OL]. Astron. Astrophys., 2011, 527: A106. arXiv:1101.1764 [astro-ph.IM]. DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201016082

  268. [285]

    Discriminating Accretion States via Rotational Sym- metry in Simulated Polarimetric Images of M87[J/OL]

    Palumbo D C M, Wong G N, Prather B S. Discriminating Accretion States via Rotational Sym- metry in Simulated Polarimetric Images of M87[J/OL]. Astrophys. J., 2020, 894(2): 156. arXiv: 2004.01751 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab86ac

  269. [286]

    Black Hole Polarimetry I: A Signature of Electromagnetic Energy Extraction[J/OL]

    Chael A, Lupsasca A, Wong G N, et al. Black Hole Polarimetry I: A Signature of Electromagnetic Energy Extraction[J/OL]. arXiv: 2307.06372 [astro-ph.HE]

  270. [287]

    Measuring Photon Rings with the ngEHT[J/OL]

    Tiede P, Johnson M D, Pesce D W, et al. Measuring Photon Rings with the ngEHT[J/OL]. Galax- ies, 2022, 10(6): 111. arXiv: 2210.13498 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.3390/galaxies10060111

  271. [288]

    Key Science Goals for the Next-Generation Event Horizon Telescope[J/OL]

    Johnson M D, Akiyama K, Blackburn L, et al. Key Science Goals for the Next-Generation Event Horizon Telescope[J/OL]. Galaxies, 2023, 11(3): 61. arXiv: 2304 . 11188 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.3390/galaxies11030061

  272. [289]

    The Structure and Dynamics of the Subparsec Jet in M87 Based on 50 VLBA Observations over 17 Y ears at 43 GHz[J/OL]

    Walker R C, Hardee P E, Davies F B, et al. The Structure and Dynamics of the Subparsec Jet in M87 Based on 50 VLBA Observations over 17 Y ears at 43 GHz[J/OL]. Astrophys. J., 2018, 855(2): 128. arXiv: 1802.06166 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaafcc

  273. [290]

    Measurement of the spin of the M87 black hole from its observed twisted light[J/OL]

    Tamburini F, Thidé B, Della Valle M. Measurement of the spin of the M87 black hole from its observed twisted light[J/OL]. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 2020, 492(1): L22-L27. arXiv: 1904 .07923 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1093/mnrasl/slz176

  274. [291]

    Event horizon silhouette: implications to super- massive black holes in the galaxies M87 and Milky Way[J/OL]

    Dokuchaev V I, Nazarova N O, Smirnov V P. Event horizon silhouette: implications to super- massive black holes in the galaxies M87 and Milky Way[J/OL]. Gen. Rel. Grav., 2019, 51(6): 81. arXiv: 1903.09594 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1007/s10714-019-2564-8

  275. [292]

    Observing the Inner Shadow of a Black Hole: A Di- rect View of the Event Horizon[J/OL]

    Chael A, Johnson M D, Lupsasca A. Observing the Inner Shadow of a Black Hole: A Di- rect View of the Event Horizon[J/OL]. Astrophys. J., 2021, 918(1): 6. arXiv: 2106 . 00683 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac09ee

  276. [293]

    Shadow and quasinormal modes of a rotating loop quantum black hole [J/OL]

    Liu C, Zhu T, Wu Q, et al. Shadow and quasinormal modes of a rotating loop quantum black hole [J/OL]. Phys. Rev. D, 2020, 101(8): 084001. arXiv: 2003.00477 [gr-qc]. DOI: 10.1103/Phys RevD.101.084001

  277. [294]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, Akiyama K, Alberdi A, et al. First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI.[J]. Astrophysical Journal Letters, 2022. References๙ն࿐Ѱൖ࿐໊ં໓

  278. [295]

    Horizon-scale tests of gravity theories and fundamental physics from the Event Horizon Telescope image of Sagittarius A (*)[J/OL]

    Vagnozzi S, Roy R, Tsai Y D, et al. Horizon-scale tests of gravity theories and fundamental physics from the Event Horizon Telescope image of Sagittarius A (*)[J/OL]. Classical and Quantum Grav- ity, 2023, 40(16): 165007. arXiv: 2205.07787 [gr-qc]. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6382/acd97b

  279. [296]

    A Jet Model for the Gamma-Ray–emitting Blazar 3C 279 [J/OL]

    Maraschi L, Ghisellini G, Celotti A. A Jet Model for the Gamma-Ray–emitting Blazar 3C 279 [J/OL]. ApJ, 1992, 397: L5. DOI: 10.1086/186531

  280. [297]

    Jets in Gamma-Ray Bursts[J/OL]

    Sari R, Piran T, Halpern J P. Jets in Gamma-Ray Bursts[J/OL]. ApJ, 1999, 519(1): L17-L20. arXiv: astro-ph/9903339 [astro-ph]. DOI: 10.1086/312109

  281. [298]

    Jets from X-ray binaries[G/OL]//Compact stellar X-ray sources: vol

    Fender R. Jets from X-ray binaries[G/OL]//Compact stellar X-ray sources: vol. 39. 2006: 381-419. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0303339

  282. [299]

    Relativistic Jets from Active Galactic Nuclei[J/OL]

    Blandford R, Meier D, Readhead A. Relativistic Jets from Active Galactic Nuclei[J/OL]. ARA&A, 2019, 57: 467-509. arXiv: 1812.06025 [astro-ph.HE]. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-astro-08181 7-051948

  283. [300]

    The limb-brightened jet of M87 down to the 7 Schwarzschild radii scale[J/OL]

    Kim J, Krichbaum T P, Lu R, et al. The limb-brightened jet of M87 down to the 7 Schwarzschild radii scale[J/OL]. A&A, 2018, 616: A188. arXiv: 1805.02478 [astro-ph.GA]. DOI: 10.105 1/0004-6361/201832921

Pith tools

Reviewed June 26, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.