pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.20105 · v1 · pith:66UHM2IInew · submitted 2026-06-18 · ⚛️ physics.chem-ph · physics.comp-ph

Can DFT-trained neural network potentials reproduce structure, solvation, and water-exchange properties in aqueous magnesium solutions?

Sebastian Falkner , Pablo Montero de Hijes , Christoph Dellago , Nadine Schwierz This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 15:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.chem-ph physics.comp-ph
keywords neural network potentialsmagnesium ionshydration structurewater exchangesolvation free energyDFT reference datatransition interface samplingaqueous solutions
0
0 comments X

The pith

DFT-trained neural network potentials capture magnesium hydration structure and water exchange but underestimate solvation free energy.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops MACE neural network potentials trained on density functional theory data for aqueous magnesium chloride solutions. These potentials accurately reproduce the octahedral structure of the first hydration shell around Mg2+ ions, diffusion coefficients, and ion pairing properties. When combined with transition path sampling, they yield water-exchange rates within one order of magnitude of experimental values, a notable improvement over classical force fields. However, the computed solvation free energy significantly underestimates the experimental value, pointing to limitations in local neural network architectures for ion solvation thermodynamics.

Core claim

DFT-trained MACE neural network potentials reproduce the structure, diffusion, and water-exchange kinetics of aqueous Mg2+ solutions with good accuracy, including a dissociative exchange mechanism via transition interface sampling, but fail to match experimental solvation free energies due to insufficient long-range electrostatic treatments in the local architectures.

What carries the argument

MACE neural network potentials trained on revPBE-D3/zd and revPBE0-D3/zd DFT data, combined with transition interface sampling for rare events.

Load-bearing premise

That local many-body neural network potentials trained solely on short-range DFT data can capture the full thermodynamics of ion solvation without additional long-range electrostatic treatments.

What would settle it

A refined calculation or measurement showing that the solvation free energy discrepancy persists even after adding explicit long-range electrostatic corrections to the NNP, or that exchange rates fall outside one order of magnitude from experiment.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.20105 by Christoph Dellago, Nadine Schwierz, Pablo Montero de Hijes, Sebastian Falkner.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Comparison of structural, dynamical, kinetic, and thermodynamic properties of aqueous Mg [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Comparison of PMF as function of the Mg2+- water oxygen distance rMg−O derived from DFT-based NNPs (revPBE-D3/zd and revPBE0-D3/zd) against two selected classical force fields Mg2+ (microMg [11] and Mamatkulov￾Schwierz[10]). 17O NMR spectroscopy, which indicates an interchange￾dissociative (Id) mechanism for Mg2+ ions [73, 74]. A common first step for characterizing Mg2+ water exchange is the calculation o… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Top: Schematic representation of water exchange [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Mg2+–Cl− radial distribution functions at a salt concentration of 1.08 m for DFT-based NNPs (revPBE-D3/zd and revPBE0-D3/zd) and classical force fields (microMg [11] and Mamatkulov-Schwierz[10]). first-shell waters to Mg2+ and indicates that Mg2+–Cl− association is primarily mediated by the hydration shell rather than direct contact. Complementary to the Mg2+–Cl− RDF, the activity derivative provides a the… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Magnesium ions play an essential role in many biological processes but remain challenging to model in biomolecular simulations. Despite considerable scientific effort, classical force fields fail to simultaneously reproduce key structural, thermodynamic and kinetic solution properties, likely due to their inability to explicitly account for quantum many-body effects. Here, we develop and systematically benchmark MACE neural network potentials (NNPs) for aqueous MgCl$_2$ solutions trained on revPBE-D3/zd and revPBE0-D3/zd density functional theory reference data and assess their ability to reproduce a broad range of experimental solution properties including the structure of the first hydration shell, diffusion coefficient, activity derivative, water-exchange rate and mechanism as well as solvation free energy. Both NNPs accurately reproduce the octahedral structure of the first hydration shell, ion pairing properties and diffusion coefficients. Combining the NNPs with transition path sampling and other enhanced sampling techniques allows us to capture the rare event of water exchange in the first hydration shell of Mg$^{2+}$ revealing a dissociative exchange mechanism. Transition interface sampling yields exchange rates within one order of magnitude of experiment, representing a substantial improvement over classical dissociative force fields. In contrast, the NNP-derived solvation free energy significantly underestimates the experimental value, revealing a limitation of the present local NNP architectures for describing ion solvation thermodynamics. Our results demonstrate that DFT-trained NNPs can accurately describe Mg$^{2+}$ hydration structure, diffusion, ion pairing, and exchange kinetics, while highlighting the need for explicit long-range electrostatic treatments to achieve quantitative agreement with experimental ion solvation free energies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops and benchmarks MACE neural network potentials trained on revPBE-D3/zd and revPBE0-D3/zd DFT reference data for aqueous MgCl2 solutions. It reports that the NNPs accurately reproduce the octahedral first hydration shell structure, ion pairing, and diffusion coefficients; when combined with transition interface sampling and enhanced sampling, they capture a dissociative water-exchange mechanism with rates within one order of magnitude of experiment (a substantial improvement over classical dissociative force fields); however, the computed solvation free energy significantly underestimates the experimental value, which the authors attribute to the limitations of local NNP architectures for long-range electrostatics.

Significance. If the reported results hold, the work provides concrete evidence that DFT-trained local NNPs can deliver meaningful improvements over classical force fields for structural, diffusive, and kinetic properties of strongly solvated ions, while transparently documenting a thermodynamic limitation that points to the need for explicit long-range treatments. The combination of NNPs with transition path sampling for rare-event kinetics is a notable technical contribution.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (final paragraph) and results on water exchange: the claim that transition interface sampling yields rates 'within one order of magnitude of experiment' is central to the assertion of substantial improvement over classical force fields, yet the manuscript provides no error bars, number of sampled trajectories, or convergence diagnostics for the rate estimates; without these, the quantitative comparison cannot be fully assessed.
  2. Abstract and solvation free energy section: the reported significant underestimation of the experimental solvation free energy is used to highlight a limitation of local NNPs, but the manuscript does not detail the thermodynamic integration or free-energy calculation protocol (e.g., reference state, finite-size corrections, or electrostatic treatment), which is load-bearing for interpreting whether the discrepancy is indeed due to missing long-range effects rather than other methodological choices.
minor comments (1)
  1. The training-set construction (size, diversity of configurations, and how revPBE vs. revPBE0 data were combined) is only briefly described; expanding this would strengthen reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment and recommendation for minor revision. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (final paragraph) and results on water exchange: the claim that transition interface sampling yields rates 'within one order of magnitude of experiment' is central to the assertion of substantial improvement over classical force fields, yet the manuscript provides no error bars, number of sampled trajectories, or convergence diagnostics for the rate estimates; without these, the quantitative comparison cannot be fully assessed.

    Authors: We agree that explicit error bars, the number of sampled trajectories, and convergence diagnostics are needed to fully support the quantitative claim. We will revise the manuscript to include these details in the results section and a brief mention in the abstract, ensuring the comparison to experiment can be properly evaluated. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [—] Abstract and solvation free energy section: the reported significant underestimation of the experimental solvation free energy is used to highlight a limitation of local NNPs, but the manuscript does not detail the thermodynamic integration or free-energy calculation protocol (e.g., reference state, finite-size corrections, or electrostatic treatment), which is load-bearing for interpreting whether the discrepancy is indeed due to missing long-range effects rather than other methodological choices.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a fuller description of the free-energy protocol is required for the interpretation. We will expand the methods and results sections to detail the thermodynamic integration setup, reference state, finite-size corrections, and electrostatic treatment, which will clarify that the observed discrepancy is consistent with limitations of local NNPs. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained against external benchmarks

full rationale

The paper trains MACE NNPs on independent revPBE-D3/zd and revPBE0-D3/zd DFT reference data, then directly compares outputs (structure, diffusion, ion pairing, exchange rates via transition interface sampling) to separate experimental values and DFT references. The central claims on kinetics (within one order of magnitude of experiment, improvement over classical fields) and the noted underestimation of solvation free energy are presented as direct comparisons without any quantity being defined in terms of itself, any fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, or load-bearing self-citations. The manuscript explicitly flags the local NNP limitation rather than assuming sufficiency, making the derivation chain independent of its inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the transferability of the chosen DFT functionals to aqueous Mg2+ and on the assumption that local many-body descriptors suffice for long-range electrostatics; both are domain assumptions rather than derived quantities.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption revPBE-D3/zd and revPBE0-D3/zd DFT calculations provide an adequate reference for training NNPs on Mg2+ hydration
    Abstract states the NNPs are trained on these two levels of theory and then compared to experiment.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5836 in / 1306 out tokens · 21460 ms · 2026-06-26T15:24:50.561618+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    V. K. Misra and D. E. Draper, On the role of magnesium ions in RNA stability, Biopolymers48, 113 (1998)

    1998

  2. [2]

    N. H. Williams, Magnesium Ion Catalyzed ATP Hydroly- sis, Journal of the American Chemical Society122, 12023 (2000)

    2000

  3. [3]

    Cowan, Structural and catalytic chemistry of magnesium-dependent enzymes, Biometals15, 225 (2002)

    J. Cowan, Structural and catalytic chemistry of magnesium-dependent enzymes, Biometals15, 225 (2002)

    2002

  4. [4]

    Pyle, Metal ions in the structure and function of RNA, JBIC Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry7, 679 (2002)

    A. Pyle, Metal ions in the structure and function of RNA, JBIC Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry7, 679 (2002). 10

    2002

  5. [5]

    B. Born, H. Weing¨ artner, E. Br¨ undermann, and M. Havenith, Solvation Dynamics of Model Peptides Probed by Terahertz Spectroscopy. Observation of the Onset of Collective Network Motions, Journal of the American Chemical Society131, 3752 (2009)

    2009

  6. [6]

    Stachura, S

    M. Stachura, S. Chakraborty, A. Gottberg, L. Ruck- thong, V. L. Pecoraro, and L. Hemmingsen, Direct Ob- servation of Nanosecond Water Exchange Dynamics at a Protein Metal Site, Journal of the American Chemical Society139, 79 (2017)

    2017

  7. [7]

    Alln´ er, L

    O. Alln´ er, L. Nilsson, and A. Villa, Magnesium Ion–Water Coordination and Exchange in Biomolecular Simulations, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computa- tion8, 1493 (2012)

    2012

  8. [8]

    Li and K

    P. Li and K. M. Merz, Taking into Account the Ion- Induced Dipole Interaction in the Nonbonded Model of Ions, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation10, 289 (2014)

    2014

  9. [9]

    Dubou´ e-Dijon, P

    E. Dubou´ e-Dijon, P. E. Mason, H. E. Fischer, and P. Jungwirth, Hydration and Ion Pairing in Aqueous Mg 2+ and Zn 2+ Solutions: Force-Field Description Aided by Neutron Scattering Experiments and Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations, The Journal of Physi- cal Chemistry B122, 3296 (2018)

    2018

  10. [10]

    Mamatkulov and N

    S. Mamatkulov and N. Schwierz, Force fields for mono- valent and divalent metal cations in TIP3P water based on thermodynamic and kinetic properties, The Journal of Chemical Physics148, 074504 (2018)

    2018

  11. [11]

    K. K. Grotz, S. Cruz-Le´ on, and N. Schwierz, Opti- mized Magnesium Force Field Parameters for Biomolec- ular Simulations with Accurate Solvation, Ion-Binding, and Water-Exchange Properties, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation17, 2530 (2021)

    2021

  12. [12]

    Soniat, L

    M. Soniat, L. Hartman, and S. W. Rick, Charge Trans- fer Models of Zinc and Magnesium in Water, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation11, 1658 (2015)

    2015

  13. [13]

    Z. Jing, C. Liu, R. Qi, and P. Ren, Many-body effect determines the selectivity for Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ in pro- teins, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, 10.1073/pnas.1805049115 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1805049115 2018

  14. [14]

    Mamatkulov, M

    S. Mamatkulov, M. Fyta, and R. R. Netz, Force fields for divalent cations based on single-ion and ion- pair properties, The Journal of Chemical Physics138, 10.1063/1.4772808 (2013)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4772808 2013

  15. [15]

    P. Li, B. P. Roberts, D. K. Chakravorty, and K. M. Merz, Rational Design of Particle Mesh Ewald Compat- ible Lennard-Jones Parameters for +2 Metal Cations in Explicit Solvent, Journal of Chemical Theory and Com- putation9, 2733 (2013)

    2013

  16. [16]

    Schwierz, Kinetic pathways of water exchange in the first hydration shell of magnesium, The Journal of Chem- ical Physics152, 224106 (2020)

    N. Schwierz, Kinetic pathways of water exchange in the first hydration shell of magnesium, The Journal of Chem- ical Physics152, 224106 (2020)

    2020

  17. [17]

    Cruz-Le´ on and N

    S. Cruz-Le´ on and N. Schwierz, Hofmeister Series for Metal-Cation–RNA Interactions: The Interplay of Bind- ing Affinity and Exchange Kinetics, Langmuir36, 5979 (2020)

    2020

  18. [18]

    Fyta and R

    M. Fyta and R. R. Netz, Ionic force field optimization based on single-ion and ion-pair solvation properties: Go- ing beyond standard mixing rules, The Journal of Chem- ical Physics136, 10.1063/1.3693330 (2012)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3693330 2012

  19. [19]

    Leontyev and A

    I. Leontyev and A. Stuchebrukhov, Accounting for elec- tronic polarization in non-polarizable force fields, Physi- cal Chemistry Chemical Physics13, 2613 (2011)

    2011

  20. [20]

    Kohagen, P

    M. Kohagen, P. E. Mason, and P. Jungwirth, Accurate Description of Calcium Solvation in Concentrated Aque- ous Solutions, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B118, 7902 (2014)

    2014

  21. [21]

    I. M. Zeron, J. L. F. Abascal, and C. Vega, A force field of Li+, Na+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Cl-, and SO42- in aqueous solution based on the TIP4P/2005 water model and scaled charges for the ions, The Journal of Chemical Physics151, 10.1063/1.5121392 (2019)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5121392 2005

  22. [22]

    P. Li, L. F. Song, and K. M. Merz, Systematic Parame- terization of Monovalent Ions Employing the Nonbonded Model, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 11, 1645 (2015)

    2015

  23. [23]

    Schran, F

    C. Schran, F. L. Thiemann, P. Rowe, E. A. M¨ uller, O. Marsalek, and A. Michaelides, Machine learning po- tentials for complex aqueous systems made simple, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118, 10.1073/pnas.2110077118 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2110077118 2021

  24. [24]

    Kocer, T

    E. Kocer, T. W. Ko, and J. Behler, Neural Network Po- tentials: A Concise Overview of Methods, Annual Review of Physical Chemistry73, 163 (2022)

    2022

  25. [25]

    Omranpour, P

    A. Omranpour, P. Montero de Hijes, J. Behler, and C. Dellago, Perspective: Atomistic simulations of water and aqueous systems with machine learning potentials, The Journal of Chemical Physics160, 10.1063/5.0201241 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0201241 2024

  26. [26]

    J. Daru, H. Forbert, J. Behler, and D. Marx, Coupled Cluster Molecular Dynamics of Condensed Phase Sys- tems Enabled by Machine Learning Potentials: Liquid Water Benchmark, Physical Review Letters129, 226001 (2022)

    2022

  27. [27]

    J. Liu, J. Lan, and X. He, Toward High-level Machine Learning Potential for Water Based on Quantum Frag- mentation and Neural Networks, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A126, 3926 (2022)

    2022

  28. [28]

    Batatia, D

    I. Batatia, D. P. Kov´ acs, G. N. Simm, C. Ortner, and G. Cs´ anyi, MACE: Higher Order Equivariant Message Passing Neural Networks for Fast and Accurate Force Fields, inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 35 (2022)

    2022

  29. [29]

    Morawietz, A

    T. Morawietz, A. Singraber, C. Dellago, and J. Behler, How van der Waals interactions determine the unique properties of water, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences113, 8368 (2016)

    2016

  30. [30]

    Montero de Hijes, C

    P. Montero de Hijes, C. Dellago, R. Jinnouchi, B. Schmiedmayer, and G. Kresse, Comparing machine learning potentials for water: Kernel-based regression and Behler–Parrinello neural networks, The Journal of Chemical Physics160, 10.1063/5.0197105 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0197105 2024

  31. [31]

    F. C. Lightstone, E. Schwegler, R. Q. Hood, F. Gygi, and G. Galli, A first principles molecular dynamics simulation of the hydrated magnesium ion, Chemical Physics Letters 343, 549 (2001)

    2001

  32. [32]

    Bhattacharjee, A

    A. Bhattacharjee, A. B. Pribil, B. R. Randolf, B. M. Rode, and T. S. Hofer, Hydration of Mg2+ and its influ- ence on the water hydrogen bonding network via ab initio QMCF MD, Chemical Physics Letters536, 39 (2012)

    2012

  33. [33]

    X. Wang, D. Toroz, S. Kim, S. L. Clegg, G.-S. Park, and D. D. Tommaso, Density functional theory based molecular dynamics study of solution composition effects on the solvation shell of metal ions, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics22, 16301 (2020)

    2020

  34. [34]

    Juraskova, G

    V. Juraskova, G. Tusha, H. Zhang, L. V. Sch¨ afer, and F. Duarte, Modelling ligand exchange in metal complexes 11 with machine learning potentials, Faraday Discussions 256, 156 (2025)

    2025

  35. [35]

    Ferretti, G

    A. Ferretti, G. Melani, L. Benedetti, R. A. Sorodoc, A. Fortunelli, and G. Brancato, Accurate Simulations of Water and Aqueous Solutions through Fine-Tuned Dispersion-Corrected Density Functional Theory and Machine-Learning Interatomic Potentials, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling65, 12437 (2025)

    2025

  36. [36]

    O’Neill, B

    N. O’Neill, B. X. Shi, K. Fong, A. Michaelides, and C. Schran, To Pair or not to Pair? Machine-Learned Explicitly-Correlated Electronic Structure for NaCl in Water, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters15, 6081 (2024)

    2024

  37. [37]

    Soyemi and T

    A. Soyemi and T. Szilv´ asi, Modeling the Behavior of Complex Aqueous Electrolytes Using Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials: The Case of Sodium Sulfate, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B129, 9405 (2025)

    2025

  38. [38]

    C. Cao, A. Kingan, R. C. Hill, J. Kuang, L. Wang, C. Zhang, M. R. Carbone, H. van Dam, S. Yoo, S. Yan, E. S. Takeuchi, K. J. Takeuchi, X. Wu, A. M. Abeykoon, A. C. Marschilok, and D. Lu, Resolving the Solvation Structure and Transport Properties of Aqueous Zinc Electrolytes from Salt-in-Water to Water-in-Salt Using Neural Network Potential, PRX Energy4, 0...

    2025

  39. [39]

    M. J. Gillan, D. Alf` e, and A. Michaelides, Perspective: How good is DFT for water?, The Journal of Chemical Physics144, 10.1063/1.4944633 (2016)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4944633 2016

  40. [40]

    Palos, E

    E. Palos, E. Lambros, S. Swee, J. Hu, S. Dasgupta, and F. Paesani, Assessing the Interplay between Functional- Driven and Density-Driven Errors in DFT Models of Wa- ter, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation18, 3410 (2022)

    2022

  41. [41]

    Dasgupta, E

    S. Dasgupta, E. Lambros, J. P. Perdew, and F. Pae- sani, Elevating density functional theory to chemical ac- curacy for water simulations through a density-corrected many-body formalism, Nature Communications12, 6359 (2021)

    2021

  42. [42]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Physical Review Letters77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  43. [43]

    Generalized Gra- dient Approximation Made Simple

    Y. Zhang and W. Yang, Comment on “Generalized Gra- dient Approximation Made Simple”, Physical Review Letters80, 890 (1998)

    1998

  44. [44]

    Adamo and V

    C. Adamo and V. Barone, Toward reliable density func- tional methods without adjustable parameters: The PBE0 model, The Journal of Chemical Physics110, 6158 (1999)

    1999

  45. [45]

    A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu.J

    S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich, and H. Krieg, A con- sistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of den- sity functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu, The Journal of Chemical Physics132, 10.1063/1.3382344 (2010)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3382344 2010

  46. [46]

    Grimme, S

    S. Grimme, S. Ehrlich, and L. Goerigk, Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density func- tional theory, Journal of Computational Chemistry32, 1456 (2011)

    2011

  47. [47]

    K. N. Lausch, R. E. Haouari, D. Trzewik, and J. Behler, Impact of the damping function in dispersion-corrected density functional theory on the properties of liq- uid water, The Journal of Chemical Physics163, 10.1063/5.0275244 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0275244 2025

  48. [48]

    M. J. Abraham, T. Murtola, R. Schulz, S. P´ all, J. C. Smith, B. Hess, and E. Lindahl, GROMACS: High per- formance molecular simulations through multi-level par- allelism from laptops to supercomputers, SoftwareX1-2, 19 (2015)

    2015

  49. [49]

    W. L. Jorgensen, J. Chandrasekhar, J. D. Madura, R. W. Impey, and M. L. Klein, Comparison of simple poten- tial functions for simulating liquid water, The Journal of Chemical Physics79, 926 (1983)

    1983

  50. [50]

    Hutter, M

    J. Hutter, M. Iannuzzi, F. Schiffmann, and J. VandeVon- dele, cp2k: atomistic simulations of condensed matter systems, WIREs Computational Molecular Science4, 15 (2014)

    2014

  51. [51]

    Lippert, J

    G. Lippert, J. Hutter, and M. Parrinello, The Gaussian and augmented-plane-wave density functional method for ab initio molecular dynamics simulations, Theoretical Chemistry Accounts: Theory, Computation, and Mod- eling (Theoretica Chimica Acta)103, 124 (1999)

    1999

  52. [52]

    Goedecker, M

    S. Goedecker, M. Teter, and J. Hutter, Separable dual- space Gaussian pseudopotentials, Physical Review B54, 1703 (1996)

    1996

  53. [53]

    Hartwigsen, S

    C. Hartwigsen, S. Goedecker, and J. Hutter, Relativistic separable dual-space Gaussian pseudopotentials from H to Rn, Physical Review B58, 3641 (1998)

    1998

  54. [55]

    Montero de Hijes, C

    P. Montero de Hijes, C. Dellago, R. Jinnouchi, and G. Kresse, Density isobar of water and melting tem- perature of ice: Assessing common density functionals, The Journal of Chemical Physics161, 10.1063/5.0227514 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0227514 2024

  55. [56]

    Eastman, J

    P. Eastman, J. Swails, J. D. Chodera, R. T. McGibbon, Y. Zhao, K. A. Beauchamp, L.-P. Wang, A. C. Sim- monett, M. P. Harrigan, C. D. Stern, R. P. Wiewiora, B. R. Brooks, and V. S. Pande, OpenMM 7: Rapid de- velopment of high performance algorithms for molecular dynamics, PLOS Computational Biology13, e1005659 (2017)

    2017

  56. [57]

    D. A. Sivak, J. D. Chodera, and G. E. Crooks, Time Step Rescaling Recovers Continuous-Time Dynamical Proper- ties for Discrete-Time Langevin Integration of Nonequi- librium Systems, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 118, 6466 (2014)

    2014

  57. [58]

    Laio and M

    A. Laio and M. Parrinello, Escaping free-energy min- ima, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99, 12562 (2002)

    2002

  58. [59]

    Barducci, G

    A. Barducci, G. Bussi, and M. Parrinello, Well-Tempered Metadynamics: A Smoothly Converging and Tunable Free-Energy Method, Physical Review Letters100, 020603 (2008)

    2008

  59. [60]

    Torrie and J

    G. Torrie and J. Valleau, Nonphysical sampling distri- butions in Monte Carlo free-energy estimation: Um- brella sampling, Journal of Computational Physics23, 187 (1977)

    1977

  60. [61]

    Bonomi, G

    M. Bonomi, G. Bussi, C. Camilloni, G. A. Tribello, P. Ban´ aˇ s, A. Barducci, M. Bernetti, P. G. Bolhuis, S. Bot- taro, D. Branduardi, R. Capelli, P. Carloni, M. Ceriotti, A. Cesari, H. Chen, W. Chen, F. Colizzi, S. De, M. D. L. Pierre, D. Donadio, V. Drobot, B. Ensing, A. L. Fer- guson, M. Filizola, J. S. Fraser, H. Fu, P. Gasparotto, F. L. Gervasio, F. ...

    2019

  61. [62]

    G. A. Tribello, M. Bonomi, D. Branduardi, C. Camilloni, and G. Bussi, PLUMED 2: New feathers for an old bird, Computer Physics Communications185, 604 (2014)

    2014

  62. [63]

    J. G. Kirkwood and F. P. Buff, The Statistical Mechan- ical Theory of Solutions. I, The Journal of Chemical Physics19, 774 (1951)

    1951

  63. [64]

    Karwounopoulos, Z

    J. Karwounopoulos, Z. Wu, S. Tkaczyk, S. Wang, A. Baskerville, K. Ranasinghe, T. Langer, G. P. F. Wood, M. Wieder, and S. Boresch, Insights and Challenges in Correcting Force Field Based Solvation Free Energies Us- ing a Neural Network Potential, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B128, 6693 (2024)

    2024

  64. [65]

    A. K. Picha, S. Tkaczyk, T. Langer, M. Wieder, and S. Boresch, Architecture-Independent Absolute Solvation Free Energy Calculations with Neural Network Poten- tials, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters16, 12080 (2025)

    2025

  65. [66]

    P. G. Bolhuis, D. Chandler, C. Dellago, and P. L. Geissler, Transition Path Sampling: Throwing Ropes Over Rough Mountain Passes, in the Dark, Annual Re- view of Physical Chemistry53, 291 (2002)

    2002

  66. [67]

    T. S. van Erp, D. Moroni, and P. G. Bolhuis, A novel path sampling method for the calculation of rate constants, The Journal of Chemical Physics118, 7762 (2003)

    2003

  67. [68]

    T. S. van Erp, Reaction Rate Calculation by Paral- lel Path Swapping, Physical Review Letters98, 268301 (2007)

    2007

  68. [69]

    Kumar, J

    S. Kumar, J. M. Rosenberg, D. Bouzida, R. H. Swendsen, and P. A. Kollman, THE weighted histogram analysis method for free-energy calculations on biomolecules. I. The method, Journal of Computational Chemistry13, 1011 (1992)

    1992

  69. [70]

    Marcus, Ionic radii in aqueous solutions, Chemical Reviews88, 1475 (1988)

    Y. Marcus, Ionic radii in aqueous solutions, Chemical Reviews88, 1475 (1988)

    1988

  70. [71]

    Marcus,Ion Properties(Marcel Dekker, 1997)

    Y. Marcus,Ion Properties(Marcel Dekker, 1997)

    1997

  71. [72]

    R. A. Robinson and R. H. Stokes,Electrolyte Solutions, 2nd ed. (Dover Publications, 2002)

    2002

  72. [73]

    Bleuzen, P.-A

    A. Bleuzen, P.-A. Pittet, L. Helm, and A. E. Merbach, Water exchange on magnesium(II) in aqueous solution: a variable temperature and pressure17O NMR study, Mag- netic Resonance in Chemistry35, 765 (1997)

    1997

  73. [74]

    Neely and R

    J. Neely and R. Connick, Rate of water exchange from hydrated magnesium ion, Journal of the American Chem- ical Society92, 3476 (1970)

    1970

  74. [75]

    Helm and A

    L. Helm and A. Merbach, Water exchange on metal ions: experiments and simulations, Coordination Chemistry Reviews187, 151 (1999)

    1999

  75. [76]

    Mondal, D

    A. Mondal, D. Kussainova, S. Yue, and A. Z. Pana- giotopoulos, Modeling Chemical Reactions in Alkali Car- bonate–Hydroxide Electrolytes with Deep Learning Po- tentials, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 19, 4584 (2023)

    2023

  76. [77]

    A. Park, J. Ryu, and W. B. Lee, Ionic Liquid Molecu- lar Dynamics Simulation with Machine Learning Force Fields: DPMD and MACE, arXiv:2503.18249 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  77. [78]

    D. Jiao, C. King, A. Grossfield, T. A. Darden, and P. Ren, Simulation of Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ Solvation Using Polarizable Atomic Multipole Potential, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B110, 18553 (2006)

    2006

  78. [79]

    Yeh and G

    I.-C. Yeh and G. Hummer, System-Size Dependence of Diffusion Coefficients and Viscosities from Molecular Dy- namics Simulations with Periodic Boundary Conditions, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B108, 15873 (2004)

    2004

  79. [80]

    Falkner and N

    S. Falkner and N. Schwierz, Kinetic pathways of water exchange in the first hydration shell of magnesium: In- fluence of water model and ionic force field, The Journal of Chemical Physics155, 084503 (2021)

    2021

  80. [81]

    H. B. G. C. H. Langford,Ligand Substitution Processes (W. A. Benjamin, Inc., 1965)

    1965

Showing first 80 references.