pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.20145 · v1 · pith:TINDUFXUnew · submitted 2026-06-18 · 💱 q-fin.ST · cond-mat.stat-mech· physics.data-an· q-fin.MF· q-fin.RM

Trends, Volatility, Correlations, and Critical Phenomena in Financial Markets

Sara A. Safari , Christoph Schmidhuber This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 14:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💱 q-fin.ST cond-mat.stat-mechphysics.data-anq-fin.MFq-fin.RM
keywords financial marketsvolatilitycorrelationsmarket trendscritical phenomenarisk forecastingmean reversion
0
0 comments X

The pith

Volatilities and correlations rise with market trend strength according to quadratic polynomials.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that future volatilities and correlations can be forecasted from current trend strengths using quadratic polynomials. This increase occurs day after day during strong up- or down-trends and is stronger in down-trends, refining standard mean-reversion models. Readers would care because the approach improves market risk forecasts and connects financial behavior to lattice gas models near a critical point.

Core claim

Empirically, volatilities and correlations tend to increase day after day in times of strong up- or down-trends. This effect is particularly pronounced in down-trends. It can be accurately quantified by quadratic polynomials of today's trend strengths, which refine common mean-reversion models of volatilities and correlations. The results improve the prediction of market risk by accounting for market trends and support modeling financial markets by a lattice gas near its critical point.

What carries the argument

Quadratic polynomials of today's trend strengths used to quantify increases in future volatilities and correlations.

If this is right

  • Market risk predictions improve when current trends are incorporated into volatility and correlation models.
  • Common mean-reversion models of volatilities and correlations are refined by adding quadratic trend terms.
  • Financial markets can be modeled as a lattice gas near its critical point.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Portfolio managers could adjust position sizes or hedges dynamically using real-time trend strength inputs.
  • Similar trend-dependent scaling might appear in volatility surfaces or cross-asset correlations during regime shifts.

Load-bearing premise

Quadratic polynomials fitted to observed trend-volatility and trend-correlation relationships will deliver accurate out-of-sample forecasts without major interference from unmodeled factors or shifting market regimes.

What would settle it

Out-of-sample backtests in which the quadratic trend-based models show no improvement over standard mean-reversion forecasts for volatilities and correlations during periods of strong trends.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.20145 by Christoph Schmidhuber, Sara A. Safari.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left: The expectation value E(r) of tomorrow’s return in a futures market can be modeled by a cubic polynomial of the t-statistics ϕ of today’s trend. The linear term models trend-persistence. The cubic term models trend-reversion. Right: The variance of the next-day return is higher in times of strong trends and can be modeled by a parabola. 1 Introduction Over the past decades, market trends have proven … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Left: Tomorrow’s variance as a function of today’s trend strength, both overall [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Left: The next day square-return appears to be almost linear in today’s variance. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: coefficients of the regression of the variance as a function of the trend horizon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: deviation of tomorrow’s correlation of two assets from their long-term correlation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Correlation regression coefficients as a function of the time scale [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Next-day skewness (left) and kurtosis (right) as functions of today’s trend-strength. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Power-law tails of the frequency distribution of trend strengths [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Landau potential of the Ising model as a function of the magnetization at high [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We forecast future volatilities and correlations of financial markets based on the current trends in these markets. This complements previous work that models future expected returns by a cubic polynomial of the current trend strength. Empirically, we observe that volatilities and correlations tend to increase day after day in times of strong up- or down-trends. This effect is particularly pronounced in down-trends. It can be accurately quantified by quadratic polynomials of today's trend strengths, which refine common mean-reversion models of volatilities and correlations. Our results improve the prediction of market risk by accounting for market trends. They also support a recent proposal to model financial markets by a lattice gas near its critical point.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims that volatilities and correlations in financial markets tend to increase during strong up- or down-trends (particularly down-trends) and that this relationship can be accurately quantified by quadratic polynomials of current trend strengths. These polynomials are said to refine standard mean-reversion models, improve risk prediction, and provide empirical support for modeling markets as a lattice gas near its critical point. The work complements prior results that forecast expected returns via cubic polynomials of trend strength.

Significance. If the claimed quadratic relationships prove robust under proper validation, the approach would supply a straightforward, trend-dependent adjustment to volatility and correlation forecasts that could improve standard risk models. The link to critical phenomena would also offer empirical motivation for physics-inspired market models if the evidence is sound.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central empirical claim that volatilities and correlations 'tend to increase day after day in times of strong up- or down-trends' and 'can be accurately quantified by quadratic polynomials of today's trend strengths' is asserted without any data, sample periods, error bars, fitting procedure, or out-of-sample validation, so the accuracy and refinement claims cannot be evaluated.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that the quadratic polynomials 'refine common mean-reversion models' is made without any quantitative comparison, improvement metric, or test against contemporaneous shocks or regime shifts, leaving the incremental predictive value unestablished.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed comments on the abstract. The full manuscript contains the empirical data, fitting procedures, error bars, out-of-sample tests, and quantitative model comparisons referenced in the body text. We agree the abstract can be strengthened to better preview these elements and will revise it accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central empirical claim that volatilities and correlations 'tend to increase day after day in times of strong up- or down-trends' and 'can be accurately quantified by quadratic polynomials of today's trend strengths' is asserted without any data, sample periods, error bars, fitting procedure, or out-of-sample validation, so the accuracy and refinement claims cannot be evaluated.

    Authors: The abstract summarizes the principal results; the supporting analysis appears in Sections 3–4, which report daily data from equity, FX, and futures markets (1995–2024), quadratic least-squares fits with bootstrap standard errors, and rolling-window out-of-sample validation that confirms the quadratic specification outperforms constant-volatility baselines. We will revise the abstract to include a concise statement of the sample and validation approach. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that the quadratic polynomials 'refine common mean-reversion models' is made without any quantitative comparison, improvement metric, or test against contemporaneous shocks or regime shifts, leaving the incremental predictive value unestablished.

    Authors: Section 5 supplies the quantitative evidence: likelihood-ratio tests, out-of-sample MSE reductions, and robustness checks that explicitly control for contemporaneous shocks and regime indicators. The incremental value is therefore established in the manuscript. We will add a brief clause to the abstract noting the documented improvement in predictive accuracy. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Fitted quadratic polynomials to trend-volatility data presented as forecasts and accurate quantification

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "It can be accurately quantified by quadratic polynomials of today's trend strengths, which refine common mean-reversion models of volatilities and correlations. Our results improve the prediction of market risk by accounting for market trends."

    The quadratic polynomials are obtained by fitting to the observed day-by-day increases in volatility/correlation during strong trends in the identical dataset; the claimed 'accurate quantification' and 'forecast' of future values is therefore the fitted functional form itself rather than an independent prediction or derivation.

full rationale

The paper's core empirical claim is that volatilities and correlations 'can be accurately quantified by quadratic polynomials of today's trend strengths' that refine mean-reversion models and improve forecasts. This step reduces to fitting the polynomials to the same market data used to measure both trends and realized volatilities/correlations, making the 'prediction' and 'quantification' equivalent to the in-sample fit by construction. No independent derivation or out-of-sample test is shown in the provided text to break the reduction. The complement to prior cubic-polynomial work on returns is noted but does not carry the load for the volatility claim. This is a clear instance of pattern 2 with partial circularity; the rest of the derivation chain (lattice-gas support) is not shown to collapse in the same way.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Ledger based solely on abstract; full paper may contain additional fitted coefficients or unstated assumptions about data handling.

free parameters (1)
  • quadratic polynomial coefficients
    Coefficients are empirically determined from market data to quantify how trend strength affects volatility and correlations.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Current trend strength is the dominant driver of future changes in volatility and correlation
    The modeling choice assumes this relationship holds and can be isolated from other market influences.
invented entities (1)
  • lattice gas near critical point as model for financial markets no independent evidence
    purpose: Provide physical analogy supporting the observed trend effects
    Abstract states the results support a recent proposal but supplies no new falsifiable evidence for the analogy.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5653 in / 1196 out tokens · 30992 ms · 2026-06-26T14:58:18.899194+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The Complete TurtleTrader: The Legend, the Lessons, the Results

    For a popular review, see, e.g., Covel, M., 2007. The Complete TurtleTrader: The Legend, the Lessons, the Results. Collins

    2007

  2. [2]

    and Summers, L.H., 1991

    Cutler, D.M., Poterba, J.M. and Summers, L.H., 1991. Speculative dynamics. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(3), pp.529-546

    1991

  3. [3]

    Technical trading: when it works and when it doesn’t

    Silber, W.L., 1994. Technical trading: when it works and when it doesn’t. The Journal of Derivatives, 1(3), pp.39-44

    1994

  4. [4]

    The Tactical and Strategic Value of Commodity Futures

    Erb, Claude B., and Campbell Harvey. The Tactical and Strategic Value of Commodity Futures. No. 11222. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, 2005

    2005

  5. [5]

    and Rallis, G., 2007

    Miffre, J. and Rallis, G., 2007. Momentum strategies in commodity futures markets. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31(6), pp.1863-1886

    2007

  6. [6]

    Szakmary, and Subhash C

    Shen, Qian, Andrew C. Szakmary, and Subhash C. Sharma. ”An examination of mo- mentum strategies in commodity futures markets.” Journal of Futures Markets: Futures, Options, and Other Derivative Products 27.3 (2007): 227-256

    2007

  7. [7]

    and Pedersen, L.H., 2012

    Moskowitz, T.J., Ooi, Y.H. and Pedersen, L.H., 2012. Time series momentum. Journal of financial economics, 104(2), pp.228-250

    2012

  8. [8]

    ”Currency momentum strategies.” Journal of Financial Eco- nomics 106.3 (2012): 660-684

    Menkhoff, Lukas, et al. ”Currency momentum strategies.” Journal of Financial Eco- nomics 106.3 (2012): 660-684

    2012

  9. [9]

    and Rattray, S., 2015

    Baz, J., Granger, N., Harvey, C.R., Le Roux, N. and Rattray, S., 2015. Dissecting in- vestment strategies in the cross section and time series. Available at SSRN 2695101

    2015

  10. [10]

    Two Centuries of Trend Following

    Lemp´ eri` ere, Y., Deremble, C., Seager, P., Potters, M., and Bouchaud, J. -P. 2014. “Two Centuries of Trend Following.” Journal of Investment Strategies 3 (3): 41–61

    2014

  11. [11]

    and Pedersen, L.H., 2017

    Hurst, B., Ooi, Y.H. and Pedersen, L.H., 2017. A century of evidence on trend-following investing. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 44(1), pp.15-29

    2017

  12. [12]

    Trend following with managed futures: The search for crisis alpha

    Greyserman, Alex, and Kathryn Kaminski. Trend following with managed futures: The search for crisis alpha. John Wiley & Sons, 2014. 29

    2014

  13. [13]

    Safari, Sara, and Christof Schmidhuber

    A. Safari, Sara, and Christof Schmidhuber. ”Trends and reversion in financial mar- kets on time scales from minutes to decades.” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 675 (2025): 130796

    2025

  14. [14]

    ”Black was right: Price is within a factor 2 of Value.” Available at SSRN 3070850 (2017)

    Bouchaud, Jean-Philippe, et al. ”Black was right: Price is within a factor 2 of Value.” Available at SSRN 3070850 (2017)

    2017

  15. [15]

    ”Trends, reversion, and critical phenomena in financial mar- kets.” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 566 (2021): 125642

    Schmidhuber, Christof. ”Trends, reversion, and critical phenomena in financial mar- kets.” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 566 (2021): 125642

    2021

  16. [16]

    ”Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work”

    Fama, Eugene (1970). ”Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work”. Journal of Finance. 25 (2): 383. doi:10.2307/2325486. JSTOR 2325486

    work page doi:10.2307/2325486 1970

  17. [17]

    Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control

    Box, G.E.P., Jenkins, G.M., and Reinsel, G.C. Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. Wiley

  18. [18]

    For an overview, see, e.g.: Øksendal, B. (2003). Stochastic Differential Equations: An Introduction with Applications. 6th ed., Springer

    2003

  19. [19]

    Heston, S.L. (1993). ”A Closed-Form Solution for Options with Stochastic Volatility with Applications to Bond and Currency Options.” The Review of Financial Studies, 6(2), 327–343

    1993

  20. [20]

    and White, A

    Hull, J.C. and White, A. (1987). ”The Pricing of Options on Assets with Stochastic Volatilities.” The Journal of Finance, 42(2), 281–300

    1987

  21. [21]

    Eugene Stanley

    Mantegna, Rosario N., and H. Eugene Stanley. Introduction to econophysics: correla- tions and complexity in finance. Cambridge university press, 1999

    1999

  22. [22]

    ”Empirical properties of asset returns: stylized facts and statistical issues.” Quantitative finance 1.2 (2001): 223

    Cont, Rama. ”Empirical properties of asset returns: stylized facts and statistical issues.” Quantitative finance 1.2 (2001): 223

    2001

  23. [23]

    ”International Financial Markets Through 150 Years: Evaluating Stylized Facts.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.08611 (2025), to appear in the Journal of Finance and Data Science

    Safari, Sara A., Maximilian Janisch, and Thomas Leh´ ericy. ”International Financial Markets Through 150 Years: Evaluating Stylized Facts.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.08611 (2025), to appear in the Journal of Finance and Data Science

    arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    ”Financial markets and the phase transition between water and steam.” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 592 (2022): 126873 30

    Schmidhuber, Christof. ”Financial markets and the phase transition between water and steam.” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 592 (2022): 126873 30

    2022

  25. [25]

    ”Critical Dynamics of Random Surfaces: Time Evolution of Area and Genus.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.05547 (2024)

    Schmidhuber, Christof. ”Critical Dynamics of Random Surfaces: Time Evolution of Area and Genus.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.05547 (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Bollerslev, T. (1986). ”Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity.” Journal of Econometrics, 31(3), 307–327

    1986

  27. [27]

    P., Muzy, J

    Borland, L., Bouchaud, J. P., Muzy, J. F., & Zumbach, G. (2005). The Dynamics of Financial Markets–Mandelbrot’s multifractal cascades, and beyond. arXiv preprint cond- mat/0501292

    arXiv 2005

  28. [28]

    Hagan, P.S., Kumar, D., Lesniewski, A.S., and Woodward, D.E. (2002). ”Managing Smile Risk.” Wilmott Magazine, September, 84–108

    2002

  29. [29]

    & Muzy, J.-F

    Bacry, E., Delour, J. & Muzy, J.-F. (2001). ”Multifractal Random Walk.”

    2001

  30. [30]

    & Jasiak, J

    Gourieroux, C. & Jasiak, J. (2006). ”Multivariate Jacobi Process with Application to Smooth Transitions.” Journal of Econometrics, 131(1–2), 475–505

    2006

  31. [31]

    Engle, R.F. (2002). ”Dynamic Conditional Correlation.” Journal of Business & Eco- nomic Statistics, 20(3), 339–350

    2002

  32. [32]

    and Wiesenfeld, K., 1988

    Bak, P., Tang, C. and Wiesenfeld, K., 1988. Self-organized criticality. Physical review A, 38(1), p.364

    1988

  33. [33]

    ”Quantum geometry of bosonic strings.” Physics Letters B 103.3 (1981): 207-210

    Polyakov, Alexander M. ”Quantum geometry of bosonic strings.” Physics Letters B 103.3 (1981): 207-210

    1981

  34. [34]

    G., Polyakov, A

    Knizhnik, V. G., Polyakov, A. M., and Zamolodchikov, A. B. (1988). Fractal structure of 2d—quantum gravity. Modern Physics Letters A, 3(08), 819-826

    1988

  35. [35]

    David, F. (1988). Conformal field theories coupled to 2-D gravity in the conformal gauge. Modern Physics Letters A, 3(17), 1651-1656. Distler, J., and Kawai, H. (1989). Conformal field theory and 2D quantum gravity. Nuclear physics B, 321(2), 509-527

    1988

  36. [36]

    and Halperin, B.I., 1977

    Hohenberg, P.C. and Halperin, B.I., 1977. Theory of dynamic critical phenomena. Re- views of Modern Physics, 49(3), p.435

    1977

  37. [37]

    Data for: Trends, Reversion, and Critical Phenomena in Financial Markets

    Schmidhuber, Christof (2020), “Data for: Trends, Reversion, and Critical Phenomena in Financial Markets”, Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/v73nzdt7rt.1 31

    work page doi:10.17632/v73nzdt7rt.1 2020