pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.21490 · v1 · pith:DBAU3SLJnew · submitted 2026-06-19 · ⚛️ physics.chem-ph · cond-mat.mes-hall

Controlling the phase behaviour of ultraconfined water via bilayer graphene stacking

Yixuan Pu , Benjamin X. Shi , Pavan Ravindra , Chris Pickard , Angelos Michaelides , Venkat Kapil This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 12:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.chem-ph cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords nanoconfined waterbilayer graphenestackingice polymorphsphase diagramproton transfersuperionic behaviourhydrogen-bond network
0
0 comments X

The pith

Bilayer graphene stacking controls phase behaviour of confined water despite a 1.4 angstrom shift.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that water confined in bilayer graphene nanocapillaries shows phase behaviour that depends strongly on whether the graphene layers are stacked in AA or AB arrangement. These two stackings differ only by a lateral shift of 1.4 angstroms, yet AA stacking stabilises different ice polymorphs, raises the melting temperature by more than 100 K, enhances proton transfer, and shifts the onset of superionic behaviour relative to AB stacking. The effects arise from stacking-induced modifications to the hydrogen-bond network that change the lateral free energy landscape and neighbouring oxygen-oxygen separations. A sympathetic reader would care because this shows that the exact atomic structure of the confining walls can qualitatively reshape the physics and chemistry of fluids at the nanoscale.

Core claim

Using machine learning interatomic potentials with first-principles accuracy, the density-temperature phase diagram of water confined within bilayer graphene nanocapillaries is computed and compared for AA and AB stacking arrangements, which differ only by a lateral shift of 1.4 Å. Despite this minimal structural change, AA stacking can stabilise different ice polymorphs, can increase the melting temperature by more than 100 K, can enhance proton transfer, and alters the onset of superionic behaviour relative to AB stacking. These effects are traced to stacking-induced changes in the hydrogen-bond network associated with modifications to the lateral free energy landscape and neighbouring O-O

What carries the argument

The AA versus AB stacking arrangement of the bilayer graphene walls, which alters the lateral free energy landscape and hydrogen-bond network of the confined water.

If this is right

  • AA stacking stabilises different ice polymorphs than AB stacking.
  • Melting temperature increases by more than 100 K under AA stacking.
  • Proton transfer is enhanced under AA stacking.
  • The onset of superionic behaviour changes with the choice of stacking.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The stacking dependence suggests that precise atomic arrangement of confining walls could be used to tune phase behaviour in other nanoconfined systems.
  • Similar lateral shifts in other layered materials may produce comparable changes in confined fluid properties.
  • The altered hydrogen-bond network could affect additional transport or reaction properties not computed in the phase diagram.

Load-bearing premise

The machine learning interatomic potentials with first-principles accuracy correctly capture the stacking-dependent differences in the hydrogen-bond network and free energy landscape for water in these nanocapillaries.

What would settle it

Measuring identical melting temperatures, ice polymorphs, and proton transfer rates for water in AA-stacked and AB-stacked bilayer graphene nanocapillaries would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.21490 by Angelos Michaelides, Benjamin X. Shi, Chris Pickard, Pavan Ravindra, Venkat Kapil, Yixuan Pu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Strong stacking dependence on the phase diagram of nanoconfined water. The temperature-density phase diagram of water confined in AB-stacked (left) and AA-stacked (right) nanocapillaries. Transition temperatures are shown as vertical black lines. Solid lines indicate a first-order phase transition while dashed lines indicate a continuous phase transition. The grey regions indicate uncertainties associated … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Stacking dependence on ionic conductivity of nanoconfined water. a,b, Ionic conductivity as a function of temperature for intermediate-density phase (a) and high-density phase (b) water confined in AA- and AB-stacked graphene, indicating a superionic phase transition. The red lines represent AA stacking, the blue lines represent AB stacking. The horizontal dashed lines indicate the superionic threshold (0.… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Graphene stacking influences both oxygen dynamics and proton transfer of nanoconfined water. a, Comparison of diffusion coefficients of water confined in AB and AA-stacked nanocapillaries in the low density phase. The red line represents AA stacking, the blue line represents AB stacking. b,c, Free energy profiles of nanoconfined water along x an y calculated from the probability distribution of the positio… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Phonon DOS in the O–H stretching region. a–c, Phonon DOS of water confined by rigid AA- and AB-stacked graphene sheets in the 2500–4000 cm−1 frequency range for low-density (a), intermediate-density (b) and high-density phases (c). Red and blue lines correspond to AA and AB stacking, respectively. Green rectangles indicate the in-plane and out-of-plane O–H stretching regions. 28 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/f… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Water confined within nanoscale capillaries exhibits phase behaviour and transport properties that differ substantially from bulk, and these effects are commonly interpreted as consequences of geometric confinement and reduced dimensionality. Here we show that confinement topology alone is insufficient to predict the behaviour of nanoconfined water. Using machine learning interatomic potentials with first-principles accuracy, we compute the density-temperature phase diagram of water confined within bilayer graphene nanocapillaries and compare AA and AB stacking arrangements, which differ only by a lateral shift of 1.4 {\AA}. Despite this minimal structural change, AA stacking can stabilise different ice polymorphs, can increase the melting temperature by more than 100 K, can enhance proton transfer, and alters the onset of superionic behaviour relative to AB stacking. We trace these effects to stacking-induced changes in the hydrogen-bond network associated with modifications to the lateral free energy landscape and neighbouring O-O separations. Our results demonstrate that even subtle atomistic variations in the confining walls can qualitatively reshape the physical and chemical behaviour of nanoconfined water, with implications for the interpretation and control of fluids under angstrom-scale confinement.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses machine learning interatomic potentials trained to first-principles accuracy to compute the density-temperature phase diagram of water confined in bilayer graphene nanocapillaries. It claims that AA versus AB stacking (differing only by a 1.4 Å lateral registry shift) stabilizes different ice polymorphs, increases the melting temperature by more than 100 K, enhances proton transfer, and shifts the onset of superionic behavior, with these effects traced to stacking-induced changes in the hydrogen-bond network and lateral free-energy landscape.

Significance. If the central results hold, the work would demonstrate that even minimal atomistic variations in confining walls can qualitatively reshape phase behavior and transport in angstrom-scale confinement, with implications for nanofluidics. The approach of deploying ML potentials for extensive sampling of confined phase diagrams provides concrete, falsifiable predictions that could be tested experimentally.

major comments (1)
  1. [Methods] Methods (and Section 2): No dedicated benchmark set of AA versus AB confined configurations at the relevant densities and temperatures is reported to validate that the MLIP correctly captures stacking-dependent differences in the hydrogen-bond network and O–O separations; any systematic bias here would propagate directly into the reported phase boundaries, Tm shifts, and proton-transfer results.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback and for recognizing the potential significance of the work. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods] Methods (and Section 2): No dedicated benchmark set of AA versus AB confined configurations at the relevant densities and temperatures is reported to validate that the MLIP correctly captures stacking-dependent differences in the hydrogen-bond network and O–O separations; any systematic bias here would propagate directly into the reported phase boundaries, Tm shifts, and proton-transfer results.

    Authors: We agree that a dedicated benchmark focused on AA versus AB stacking at the relevant confined densities and temperatures would strengthen the validation. Although the MLIP training set incorporated diverse first-principles configurations of water near graphene (including both stackings), we did not report a targeted comparison of stacking-dependent observables such as hydrogen-bond statistics and O–O separations under confinement. We will add a new subsection to the Methods (cross-referenced in Section 2) that directly compares MLIP and DFT results for these quantities on held-out AA and AB confined snapshots at the densities and temperatures used in the phase-diagram calculations. This addition will explicitly demonstrate that any systematic bias in the stacking-dependent hydrogen-bond network is negligible relative to the reported differences in Tm and proton transfer. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; phase differences derived from explicit MLIP sampling of stacking-induced landscape changes

full rationale

The paper trains MLIPs on DFT data then directly samples the density-temperature phase diagram, free-energy landscape, and H-bond network for AA vs AB graphene registries (differing by 1.4 Å). Differences in ice polymorphs, Tm, proton transfer, and superionic onset are attributed to computed changes in lateral free energy and O-O separations. No step reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter defined by the target result, no self-citation chain bears the central claim, and no ansatz or uniqueness theorem is smuggled in. The derivation remains self-contained against external DFT benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the central claim rests on the transferability and accuracy of the ML potentials for both stackings; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5745 in / 1113 out tokens · 19663 ms · 2026-06-26T12:41:47.573001+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    We employ an MLIP to represent the potential energy surface of the full system

  2. [2]

    We perform random structure searches with DFT validation to find the thermodynamically stable ice phases for all densities in both stacking arrangements at 0 K (neglecting quantum nuclear effects)

  3. [3]

    We perform classical MD simulations at various temperatures to investigate the melting temperature

  4. [4]

    These simulations are used to understand proton transfer, transport, and the onset of the superionic phase transition

    We perform PIMD simulations to investigate structural properties and Te PIGS simulations58 to investigate dynamical properties at various temperatures for all densities and both stack- ings. These simulations are used to understand proton transfer, transport, and the onset of the superionic phase transition

  5. [5]

    Additional computational details specific to the systems associated with the three different density regimes are provided in tables S5 - S7 of the SI

    To understand how the observed behaviours are linked to hydrogen bonding, we compute phonon densities of states in the confined ice phases. Additional computational details specific to the systems associated with the three different density regimes are provided in tables S5 - S7 of the SI

  6. [6]

    65 (reported in its respective SI)

    Overview of MLIP We employ a previously developed revPBE0-D3 MLIP62–64 from Ref. 65 (reported in its respective SI). The revPBE0-D3 functional has been previously shown to yield sub-kcal/mol accuracy for water binding to carbon nanostructures 66, provides a good description of structural and dynamical prop- erties of bulk water under ambient conditions in...

  7. [7]

    sensible

    Random structure search with DFT validation We apply the random structure search method pioneered by Pickard and Needs [73] together with DFT validation to obtain the most thermodynamically stable phases at 0 K (neglecting quantum nuclear effects) for each density and stacking. For each system, we generate 1000 random “sensible” structures with water mole...

  8. [8]

    MD simulations are performed using the i-PI code 75 and the MLIP via the ASE 74 socket client

    Molecular dynamics We perform molecular dynamics to determine the melting temperature of the ice phases obtained from random structure search. MD simulations are performed using the i-PI code 75 and the MLIP via the ASE 74 socket client. All MD simulations were carried out in a common super- cell of 34.22×39.52×30 ˚A. This supercell corresponds to a 16×in...

  9. [9]

    To this extent, we perform PIMD simulations for structural properties and Te PIGS for dynamical properties in theN V Tensemble

    Path integral simulations We perform path integral simulations to study proton transfer, the superionic phase transition and transport properties. To this extent, we perform PIMD simulations for structural properties and Te PIGS for dynamical properties in theN V Tensemble. We use the i-PI code together with an ASE socket client to run these simulations. ...

  10. [10]

    Based on the PIMD trajectory, we calculate the probability distribution associated with the proton transfer coordinate for all the systems

    The positions of replicas and the centroid are saved every 200 time steps. Based on the PIMD trajectory, we calculate the probability distribution associated with the proton transfer coordinate for all the systems. The proton transfer coordinateνis defined as the difference of the distances of a proton with two nearest oxygen atomsO 1 andO 2:ν=dO 1H−dO 2H...

  11. [11]

    We calculate phonon total DOS using the finite displacement method with the implementation in phonopy 78 for the full water carbon systems

    Phonon DOS We estimate the phonon DOS using the MLIP for nanoconfined ice phases to investigate how phonon modes that participate in hydrogen bonding are affected by graphene stacking. We calculate phonon total DOS using the finite displacement method with the implementation in phonopy 78 for the full water carbon systems. We use a displacement distance o...

  12. [12]

    Faucher, N

    S. Faucher, N. Aluru, M. Z. Bazant, D. Blankschtein, A. H. Brozena, J. Cumings, J. Pedro de Souza, M. Elimelech, R. Epsztein, J. T. Fourkas, A. G. Rajan, H. J. Kulik, A. Levy, A. Majumdar, C. Martin, M. McEldrew, R. P. Misra, A. Noy, T. A. Pham, M. Reed, E. Schwegler, Z. Siwy, Y. Wang, and M. Strano, Critical Knowledge Gaps in Mass Transport through Singl...

    2019

  13. [13]

    N. R. Aluru, F. Aydin, M. Z. Bazant, D. Blankschtein, A. H. Brozena, J. P. de Souza, M. Elimelech, S. Faucher, J. T. Fourkas, V. B. Koman, M. Kuehne, H. J. Kulik, H.-K. Li, Y. Li, Z. Li, A. Majumdar, J. Martis, R. P. Misra, A. Noy, T. A. Pham, H. Qu, A. Rayabharam, M. A. Reed, C. L. Ritt, E. Schwe- gler, Z. Siwy, M. S. Strano, Y. Wang, Y.-C. Yao, C. Zhan,...

    2023

  14. [14]

    Trushin, D

    M. Trushin, D. V. Andreeva, F. M. Peeters, and K. S. Novoselov, Structure and flow of low-dimensional water, Nature Reviews Physics7, 502 (2025)

    2025

  15. [15]

    Bocquet, Nanofluidics coming of age, Nature Materials19, 254 (2020)

    L. Bocquet, Nanofluidics coming of age, Nature Materials19, 254 (2020)

    2020

  16. [16]

    Majumder, N

    M. Majumder, N. Chopra, R. Andrews, and B. J. Hinds, Enhanced flow in carbon nanotubes, Nature 438, 44 (2005)

    2005

  17. [17]

    Whitby and N

    M. Whitby and N. Quirke, Fluid flow in carbon nanotubes and nanopipes, Nature Nanotechnology2, 87 (2007)

    2007

  18. [18]

    J. K. Holt, H. G. Park, Y. Wang, M. Stadermann, A. B. Artyukhin, C. P. Grigoropoulos, A. Noy, and O. Bakajin, Fast Mass Transport Through Sub-2-Nanometer Carbon Nanotubes, Science312, 1034 (2006)

    2006

  19. [19]

    J. Peng, D. Cao, Z. He, J. Guo, P. Hapala, R. Ma, B. Cheng, J. Chen, W. J. Xie, X.-Z. Li, P. Jel´ ınek, L.-M. Xu, Y. Q. Gao, E.-G. Wang, and Y. Jiang, Publisher Correction: The effect of hydration number on the interfacial transport of sodium ions, Nature563, E18 (2018)

    2018

  20. [20]

    K. Falk, F. Sedlmeier, L. Joly, R. R. Netz, and L. Bocquet, Molecular Origin of Fast Water Transport in Carbon Nanotube Membranes: Superlubricity versus Curvature Dependent Friction, Nano Letters 10, 4067 (2010)

    2010

  21. [21]

    Secchi, S

    E. Secchi, S. Marbach, A. Nigu` es, D. Stein, A. Siria, and L. Bocquet, Massive radius-dependent flow slippage in carbon nanotubes, Nature537, 210 (2016)

    2016

  22. [22]

    Siria, P

    A. Siria, P. Poncharal, A.-L. Biance, R. Fulcrand, X. Blase, S. T. Purcell, and L. Bocquet, Giant osmotic energy conversion measured in a single transmembrane boron nitride nanotube, Nature494, 455 (2013)

    2013

  23. [23]

    Siria, M.-L

    A. Siria, M.-L. Bocquet, and L. Bocquet, New avenues for the large-scale harvesting of blue energy, Nature Reviews Chemistry1, 0091 (2017)

    2017

  24. [24]

    Fumagalli, A

    L. Fumagalli, A. Esfandiar, R. Fabregas, S. Hu, P. Ares, A. Janardanan, Q. Yang, B. Radha, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, G. Gomila, K. S. Novoselov, and A. K. Geim, Anomalously low dielectric 22 constant of confined water, Science360, 1339 (2018)

    2018

  25. [25]

    R. Wang, M. Souilamas, A. Esfandiar, R. Fabregas, S. Benaglia, H. Nevison-Andrews, Q. Yang, J. Nor- mansell, P. Ares, G. Ferrari, A. Principi, A. K. Geim, and L. Fumagalli, In-plane dielectric constant and conductivity of confined water, Nature646, 606 (2025)

    2025

  26. [26]

    S. P. Surwade, S. N. Smirnov, I. V. Vlassiouk, R. R. Unocic, G. M. Veith, S. Dai, and S. M. Mahurin, Water desalination using nanoporous single-layer graphene, Nature Nanotechnology10, 459 (2015)

    2015

  27. [27]

    Radha, A

    B. Radha, A. Esfandiar, F. C. Wang, A. P. Rooney, K. Gopinadhan, A. Keerthi, A. Mishchenko, A. Janardanan, P. Blake, L. Fumagalli, M. Lozada-Hidalgo, S. Garaj, S. J. Haigh, I. V. Grigorieva, H. A. Wu, and A. K. Geim, Molecular transport through capillaries made with atomic-scale precision, Nature538, 222 (2016)

    2016

  28. [28]

    Esfandiar, B

    A. Esfandiar, B. Radha, F. C. Wang, Q. Yang, S. Hu, S. Garaj, R. R. Nair, A. K. Geim, and K. Gopinad- han, Size effect in ion transport through angstrom-scale slits, Science358, 511 (2017)

    2017

  29. [29]

    Abraham, K

    J. Abraham, K. S. Vasu, C. D. Williams, K. Gopinadhan, Y. Su, C. T. Cherian, J. Dix, E. Prestat, S. J. Haigh, I. V. Grigorieva, P. Carbone, A. K. Geim, and R. R. Nair, Tunable sieving of ions using graphene oxide membranes, Nature Nanotechnology12, 546 (2017)

    2017

  30. [30]

    Chakravarty, W

    P. Chakravarty, W. Qian, M. A. El-Sayed, and M. R. Prausnitz, Delivery of molecules into cells using carbon nanoparticles activated by femtosecond laser pulses, Nature Nanotechnology5, 607 (2010)

    2010

  31. [31]

    J. Geng, K. Kim, J. Zhang, A. Escalada, R. Tunuguntla, L. R. Comolli, F. I. Allen, A. V. Shnyrova, K. R. Cho, D. Munoz, Y. M. Wang, C. P. Grigoropoulos, C. M. Ajo-Franklin, V. A. Frolov, and A. Noy, Stochastic transport through carbon nanotubes in lipid bilayers and live cell membranes, Nature514, 612 (2014)

    2014

  32. [32]

    B. Dong, Y. Pei, F. Zhao, T. W. Goh, Z. Qi, C. Xiao, K. Chen, W. Huang, and N. Fang, In situ quantitative single-molecule study of dynamic catalytic processes in nanoconfinement, Nature Catalysis 1, 135 (2018)

    2018

  33. [33]

    P. Zuo, C. Ye, Z. Jiao, J. Luo, J. Fang, U. S. Schubert, N. B. McKeown, T. L. Liu, Z. Yang, and T. Xu, Near-frictionless ion transport within triazine framework membranes, Nature617, 299 (2023)

    2023

  34. [34]

    Algara-Siller, O

    G. Algara-Siller, O. Lehtinen, F. C. Wang, R. R. Nair, U. Kaiser, H. A. Wu, A. K. Geim, and I. V. Grigorieva, Square ice in graphene nanocapillaries, Nature519, 443 (2015)

    2015

  35. [35]

    W. Zhou, K. Yin, C. Wang, Y. Zhang, T. Xu, A. Borisevich, L. Sun, J. C. Idrobo, M. F. Chisholm, S. T. Pantelides, R. F. Klie, and A. R. Lupini, The observation of square ice in graphene questioned, Nature528, E1 (2015)

    2015

  36. [36]

    Algara-Siller, O

    G. Algara-Siller, O. Lehtinen, and U. Kaiser, Algara-Siller et al . reply, Nature528, E3 (2015)

    2015

  37. [37]

    F. C. Wang, H. A. Wu, and A. K. Geim, Wang et al. reply, Nature528, E3 (2015)

    2015

  38. [38]

    Zheng, S

    W. Zheng, S. Zhang, J. Jiang, Y. He, R. St¨ ohr, A. Denisenko, J. Wrachtrup, X. C. Zeng, K. Bian, E.-G. Wang, and Y. Jiang, Experimental observation of liquid–solid transition of nanoconfined water at ambient temperature, Nature Materials , 1 (2026). 23

    2026

  39. [39]

    K. Koga, X. C. Zeng, and H. Tanaka, Freezing of Confined Water: A Bilayer Ice Phase in Hydrophobic Nanopores, Physical Review Letters79, 5262 (1997)

    1997

  40. [40]

    S. Han, M. Y. Choi, P. Kumar, and H. E. Stanley, Phase transitions in confined water nanofilms, Nature Physics6, 685 (2010)

    2010

  41. [41]

    W.-H. Zhao, L. Wang, J. Bai, L.-F. Yuan, J. Yang, and X. C. Zeng, Highly Confined Water: Two- Dimensional Ice, Amorphous Ice, and Clathrate Hydrates, Accounts of Chemical Research47, 2505 (2014)

    2014

  42. [42]

    W.-H. Zhao, J. Bai, L.-F. Yuan, J. Yang, and X. C. Zeng, Ferroelectric hexagonal and rhombic monolayer ice phases, Chemical Science5, 1757 (2014)

    2014

  43. [43]

    Sobrino Fernandez Mario, M

    M. Sobrino Fernandez Mario, M. Neek-Amal, and F. M. Peeters, AA-stacked bilayer square ice between graphene layers, Physical Review B92, 245428 (2015)

    2015

  44. [44]

    Y. Zhu, F. Wang, J. Bai, X. C. Zeng, and H. Wu, Compression Limit of Two-Dimensional Water Constrained in Graphene Nanocapillaries, ACS Nano9, 12197 (2015)

    2015

  45. [45]

    Zhu, W.-H

    W. Zhu, W.-H. Zhao, L. Wang, D. Yin, M. Jia, J. Yang, X. C. Zeng, and L.-F. Yuan, Two-dimensional interlocked pentagonal bilayer ice: how do water molecules form a hydrogen bonding network?, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics18, 14216 (2016)

    2016

  46. [46]

    Corsetti, J

    F. Corsetti, J. Zubeltzu, and E. Artacho, Enhanced Configurational Entropy in High-Density Nanocon- fined Bilayer Ice, Physical Review Letters116, 085901 (2016)

    2016

  47. [47]

    Zubeltzu, F

    J. Zubeltzu, F. Corsetti, M. V. Fern´ andez-Serra, and E. Artacho, Continuous melting through a hexatic phase in confined bilayer water, Physical Review E93, 062137 (2016)

    2016

  48. [48]

    M. Raju, A. van Duin, and M. Ihme, Phase transitions of ordered ice in graphene nanocapillaries and carbon nanotubes, Scientific Reports8, 3851 (2018)

    2018

  49. [49]

    Li and B

    S. Li and B. Schmidt, Replica exchange MD simulations of two-dimensional water in graphene nanocap- illaries: rhombic versus square structures, proton ordering, and phase transitions, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics21, 17640 (2019)

    2019

  50. [50]

    J. Chen, G. Schusteritsch, C. J. Pickard, C. G. Salzmann, and A. Michaelides, Two Dimensional Ice from First Principles: Structures and Phase Transitions, Physical Review Letters116, 025501 (2016)

    2016

  51. [51]

    Corsetti, P

    F. Corsetti, P. Matthews, and E. Artacho, Structural and configurational properties of nanoconfined monolayer ice from first principles, Scientific Reports6, 18651 (2016)

    2016

  52. [52]

    J. Chen, A. Zen, J. G. Brandenburg, D. Alf` e, and A. Michaelides, Evidence for stable square ice from quantum Monte Carlo, Physical Review B94, 220102 (2016)

    2016

  53. [53]

    Kapil, C

    V. Kapil, C. Schran, A. Zen, J. Chen, C. J. Pickard, and A. Michaelides, The first-principles phase diagram of monolayer nanoconfined water, Nature609, 512 (2022)

    2022

  54. [54]

    B. Lin, J. Jiang, X. C. Zeng, and L. Li, Temperature-pressure phase diagram of confined monolayer water/ice at first-principles accuracy with a machine-learning force field, Nature Communications14, 4110 (2023). 24

    2023

  55. [55]

    Jiang, Y

    J. Jiang, Y. Gao, L. Li, Y. Liu, W. Zhu, C. Zhu, J. S. Francisco, and X. C. Zeng, Rich proton dynamics and phase behaviours of nanoconfined ices, Nature Physics , 1 (2024)

    2024

  56. [56]

    Kapil, C

    V. Kapil, C. Schran, A. Zen, J. Chen, C. J. Pickard, and A. Michaelides, Author Correction: The first-principles phase diagram of monolayer nanoconfined water, Nature648, E15 (2025)

    2025

  57. [57]

    Ravindra, X

    P. Ravindra, X. R. Advincula, C. Schran, A. Michaelides, and V. Kapil, Quasi-one-dimensional hydrogen bonding in nanoconfined ice, Nature Communications15, 7301 (2024)

    2024

  58. [58]

    Dufils, C

    T. Dufils, C. Schran, J. Chen, A. K. Geim, L. Fumagalli, and A. Michaelides, Origin of dielectric polarization suppression in confined water from first principles, Chemical Science15, 516 (2024)

    2024

  59. [59]

    X. R. Advincula, Y. Litman, K. D. Fong, W. C. Witt, C. Schran, and A. Michaelides, How reactive is water at the nanoscale and how to control it? (2025), arXiv:2508.13034

    arXiv 2025

  60. [60]

    Ravindra, X

    P. Ravindra, X. R. Advincula, B. X. Shi, S. W. Coles, A. Michaelides, and V. Kapil, Nuclear quantum effects amplify autoionization-driven superionic behaviour in nanoconfined monolayer water, Chemical Science 10.1039/D6SC00138F (2026)

    work page doi:10.1039/d6sc00138f 2026

  61. [61]

    Bj¨ orneholm, M

    O. Bj¨ orneholm, M. H. Hansen, A. Hodgson, L.-M. Liu, D. T. Limmer, A. Michaelides, P. Pedevilla, J. Rossmeisl, H. Shen, G. Tocci, E. Tyrode, M.-M. Walz, J. Werner, and H. Bluhm, Water at Interfaces, Chemical Reviews116, 7698 (2016)

    2016

  62. [62]

    Y. Wang, F. Tang, X. Yu, K.-Y. Chiang, C.-C. Yu, T. Ohto, Y. Chen, Y. Nagata, and M. Bonn, Interfaces govern the structure of angstrom-scale confined water solutions, Nature Communications16, 7288 (2025)

    2025

  63. [63]

    Frisenda, E

    R. Frisenda, E. Navarro-Moratalla, P. Gant, D. P. D. Lara, P. Jarillo-Herrero, R. V. Gorbachev, and A. Castellanos-Gomez, Recent progress in the assembly of nanodevices and van der Waals heterostruc- tures by deterministic placement of 2D materials, Chemical Society Reviews47, 53 (2018)

    2018

  64. [64]

    Zhang, F

    E. Zhang, F. Lin, Z. Lei, S. Qi, S. Ban, A. Vinu, J. Yi, and Y. Liu, Twist the doorknob to open the electronic properties of graphene-based van der Waals structure, Matter4, 3444 (2021)

    2021

  65. [65]

    C. Fox, Y. Mao, X. Zhang, Y. Wang, and J. Xiao, Stacking Order Engineering of Two-Dimensional Materials and Device Applications, Chemical Reviews124, 1862 (2024)

    2024

  66. [66]

    C. J. Pickard and R. J. Needs, Ab initiorandom structure searching, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter23, 053201 (2011)

    2011

  67. [67]

    Rahman, Correlations in the Motion of Atoms in Liquid Argon, Physical Review136, A405 (1964)

    A. Rahman, Correlations in the Motion of Atoms in Liquid Argon, Physical Review136, A405 (1964)

    1964

  68. [68]

    Parrinello and A

    M. Parrinello and A. Rahman, Study of an F center in molten KCl, The Journal of Chemical Physics 80, 860 (1984)

    1984

  69. [69]

    Musil, I

    F. Musil, I. Zaporozhets, F. No´ e, C. Clementi, and V. Kapil, Quantum dynamics using path inte- gral coarse-graining, The Journal of Chemical Physics 10.1063/5.0120386 (2022), publisher: American Institute of Physics

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0120386 2022

  70. [70]

    S. W. Coles, A. Hajibabaei, V. Kapil, X. R. Advincula, C. Schran, S. J. Cox, and A. Michaelides, Nanoconfined superionic water is a molecular superionic, Science Advances12, eadz6392 (2026). 25

    2026

  71. [71]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Unconven- tional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature556, 43 (2018)

    2018

  72. [72]

    K. Kim, A. DaSilva, S. Huang, B. Fallahazad, S. Larentis, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, B. J. LeRoy, A. H. MacDonald, and E. Tutuc, Tunable moir´ e bands and strong correlations in small-twist-angle bilayer graphene, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences114, 3364 (2017)

    2017

  73. [73]

    Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple

    Y. Zhang and W. Yang, Comment on “Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple”, Physical Review Letters80, 890 (1998)

    1998

  74. [74]

    Adamo and V

    C. Adamo and V. Barone, Toward reliable density functional methods without adjustable parameters: The PBE0 model, The Journal of Chemical Physics110, 6158 (1999)

    1999

  75. [75]

    Grimme, J

    S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich, and H. Krieg, A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu, The Journal of Chemical Physics132, 154104 (2010)

    2010

  76. [76]

    X. R. Advincula, K. D. Fong, A. Michaelides, and C. Schran, Protons Accumulate at the Graphene–Water Interface, ACS Nano19, 17728 (2025)

    2025

  77. [77]

    J. G. Brandenburg, A. Zen, D. Alf` e, and A. Michaelides, Interaction between water and carbon nanos- tructures: How good are current density functional approximations?, The Journal of Chemical Physics 151, 164702 (2019)

    2019

  78. [78]

    Marsalek and T

    O. Marsalek and T. E. Markland, Quantum Dynamics and Spectroscopy of Ab Initio Liquid Water: The Interplay of Nuclear and Electronic Quantum Effects, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 8, 1545 (2017)

    2017

  79. [79]

    Cheng, E

    B. Cheng, E. A. Engel, J. Behler, C. Dellago, and M. Ceriotti, Ab initio thermodynamics of liquid and solid water, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences116, 1110 (2019)

    2019

  80. [80]

    Kapil, D

    V. Kapil, D. P. Kov´ acs, G. Cs´ anyi, and A. Michaelides, First-principles spectroscopy of aqueous in- terfaces using machine-learned electronic and quantum nuclear effects, Faraday Discussions249, 50 (2024)

    2024

Showing first 80 references.