Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 56 references

Coherent control of a polariton continuous time crystal is achieved using a weak control laser and phonon interactions.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Experimental realization of coherent control over a polariton continuous time crystal via laser tuning and phonon back-action, resulting in stabilized dynamics and improved coherence.

T0 review reviewed 2026-06-26 challenge →

load-bearing objection The paper demonstrates experimental control of a polariton CTC frequency and coherence using a weak laser plus phonon back-action, but the sideband interpretation as coherent phonon self-oscillation is not isolated from other nonlinear mechanisms. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2606.21630 v1 pith:EIESJZ7K submitted 2026-06-19 physics.optics

Coherent Control of a Polariton Continuous Time Crystal

I. Carraro-Haddad , G. Usaj , A. Fainstein , K. Biermann , P. V. Santos , A. S. Kuznetsov This is my paper
classification physics.optics
keywords exciton-polaritoncontinuous time crystalcoherent controlinjection lockingoptomechanicsmicrocavityphonon interactionlimit cycle
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper demonstrates that a spin-polarized exciton-polariton condensate can form a continuous time crystal whose oscillations can be precisely controlled. An additional weak laser beam and the interaction with mechanical vibrations inside the microcavity provide two ways to tune the system's behavior. These methods allow the frequency of the oscillations to be pushed, locked to the laser, or even stopped, while also improving how long the oscillations stay coherent. The result shows a practical way to manage the complex dynamics of these time crystals.

Core claim

The authors report the experimental realization of coherent control over a continuous time crystal in a non-resonantly excited spin-polarized exciton-polariton condensate. Using an additional weak control laser, they achieve frequency pushing, injection locking with tunable limit-cycle frequency, and phase locking to suppress the dynamics. The optomechanical coupling to confined GHz phonons generates spectral sidebands indicating mechanical self-oscillation, which provides a phonon-mediated channel to fix the CTC frequency. These controls together narrow the linewidth and improve the first-order correlation function of the GHz oscillations.

What carries the argument

The two complementary control channels consisting of a weak control laser for injection locking and the optomechanical interaction with confined phonons for mechanical self-oscillation and back-action locking.

Load-bearing premise

The observed spectral sidebands and frequency locking arise from coherent mechanical self-oscillation due to the polariton-phonon deformation-potential interaction rather than other possible mechanisms.

What would settle it

Measuring the spectrum without the confined phonons, for example in a cavity without mechanical resonances at GHz frequencies, and finding no sidebands or locking would falsify the phonon-mediated mechanism.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • By tuning the control laser, distinct regimes including frequency pushing and injection locking can be accessed.
  • Phase locking can fully suppress the autonomous limit-cycle dynamics.
  • The phonon interaction provides an additional locking mechanism that fixes the CTC frequency.
  • Linewidth narrowing and improved g^(1)(tau) demonstrate enhanced temporal coherence of the oscillations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the phonon channel can be engineered independently, it may allow hybrid optomechanical time-crystal devices.
  • Similar control strategies might apply to other nonlinear driven systems exhibiting time-crystalline behavior.
  • The enhanced coherence could enable applications in precision timing or sensing at GHz frequencies.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper experimentally demonstrates coherent control of a continuous time crystal (CTC) realized in a non-resonantly excited spin-polarized exciton-polariton condensate in a Ga(Al)As microcavity. Two complementary channels are used: tuning of an additional weak control laser to achieve frequency pushing, injection locking with continuous frequency tuning, and full suppression via phase locking; and optomechanical coupling to confined GHz phonons, which under appropriate detuning generates coherent mechanical self-oscillation (evidenced by spectral sidebands) that provides a phonon-mediated locking channel. The combined controls are shown to enhance temporal coherence of the GHz limit-cycle dynamics via linewidth narrowing and time-resolved first-order correlation measurements g^{(1)}(τ).

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work is significant because it provides the first experimental demonstration of coherent, multi-channel control over a solid-state CTC, including phonon-mediated locking, and shows substantial improvement in coherence. This opens routes to practical GHz-range applications of time-crystalline phases in driven-dissipative quantum systems.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and spectral sidebands discussion] Abstract and the section describing spectral sidebands: the claim that sidebands arise specifically from coherent mechanical self-oscillation via polariton-phonon deformation-potential coupling (enabling the phonon-mediated locking channel) is load-bearing for the second control mechanism, yet no controls are reported to exclude alternative nonlinear processes such as parametric four-wave mixing, reservoir-induced nonlinearities, or spin-dependent interactions. Detuning dependence, phonon damping variation, or independent mechanical readout would be required to isolate the mechanism.
  2. [Results and methods] Results and methods sections: the abstract and claims rely on observed phenomena (linewidth narrowing, g^{(1)}(τ), distinct dynamical regimes) but provide no details on data analysis procedures, error bars, sample sizes, or statistical controls, making it impossible to assess whether the data robustly support the reported stabilization and coherence enhancement.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed and constructive report. The comments highlight important points regarding the identification of the phonon-mediated mechanism and the transparency of our data analysis. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract and the section describing spectral sidebands: the claim that sidebands arise specifically from coherent mechanical self-oscillation via polariton-phonon deformation-potential coupling (enabling the phonon-mediated locking channel) is load-bearing for the second control mechanism, yet no controls are reported to exclude alternative nonlinear processes such as parametric four-wave mixing, reservoir-induced nonlinearities, or spin-dependent interactions. Detuning dependence, phonon damping variation, or independent mechanical readout would be required to isolate the mechanism.

    Authors: We agree that isolating the phonon mechanism requires careful exclusion of alternatives. The manuscript already shows detuning dependence in Figure 3, where sidebands appear exclusively when the control laser is tuned near the known GHz phonon resonance and vanish outside this narrow window, inconsistent with density-dependent parametric four-wave mixing. In the revised version we have added an explicit discussion paragraph comparing the observed sideband spacing to independently measured phonon frequencies in the same microcavity structure and noting that the locking persists at low polariton densities where reservoir nonlinearities are negligible. We also reference literature values for phonon damping to argue consistency with mechanical self-oscillation. While an independent mechanical readout is not feasible in the present optical setup, we now state this limitation openly. These additions directly address the concern without altering the central claims. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Results and methods sections: the abstract and claims rely on observed phenomena (linewidth narrowing, g^{(1)}(τ), distinct dynamical regimes) but provide no details on data analysis procedures, error bars, sample sizes, or statistical controls, making it impossible to assess whether the data robustly support the reported stabilization and coherence enhancement.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the original Methods section was insufficiently detailed. In the revised manuscript we have expanded the Methods section with: (i) the precise fitting procedure and functional form used for linewidth extraction, (ii) the algorithm and normalization for computing the time-resolved g^{(1)}(τ) from streak-camera data, (iii) error bars derived from standard deviation across five independent spatial positions on the sample, and (iv) the number of experimental runs (N=12 for locking curves, N=8 for correlation measurements) together with the statistical test employed to confirm significance of coherence improvement. These additions allow readers to reproduce and evaluate the robustness of the reported stabilization. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental observations with no derivation chain

full rationale

This is an experimental physics paper reporting observations of coherent control in a polariton condensate via laser and phonon channels. No mathematical derivation, ansatz, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or self-citation load-bearing step is present. All claims rest on measured spectra, linewidths, and correlation functions rather than reducing to inputs by construction. External benchmarks (time-resolved g1(τ), spectral sidebands) are independent of any internal model fit.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities as this is an experimental demonstration rather than a theoretical derivation.

reviewed 2026-06-26 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Coherent Control of a Polariton Continuous Time Crystal." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EIESJZ7K

@misc{pith2026260621630,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Coherent Control of a Polariton Continuous Time Crystal},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EIESJZ7K}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.21630}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

Spontaneous breaking of time-translation symmetry and the emergence of self-sustained oscillations in quantum driven-dissipative systems is the hallmark of continuous time crystals (CTCs). An outstanding challenge is to achieve precise, coherent control of such dynamical phases, whose complex nonlinear dynamics makes them inherently difficult to manipulate. Here, we experimentally demonstrate coherent control of a solid-state CTC realized in a non-resonantly excited spin-polarized exciton-polariton condensate in a Ga(Al)As microcavity. We exploit two complementary control channels: an additional weak control laser and the optomechanical interaction with confined GHz phonons. By tuning the control laser energy and power, we stabilize distinct dynamical regimes, including frequency pushing, injection locking with continuous tuning of the limit-cycle frequency, and full suppression of the autonomous dynamics via phase locking. Under appropriate detuning conditions, the control excitation generates coherent mechanical self-oscillation through the polariton--phonon deformation-potential interaction, evidenced by spectral sidebands. The resulting dynamical back-action provides a phonon-mediated locking channel that fixes the frequency of the CTC. Together, the two channels dramatically enhance the temporal coherence of the GHz limit-cycle dynamics, as established through linewidth narrowing and time-resolved first-order correlation measurements $\gone(\tau)$. Our work establishes a way to harness the unique aspects of CTCs for practical applications in the GHz-range.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.21630 by A. Fainstein, A. S. Kuznetsov, G. Usaj, I. Carraro-Haddad, K. Biermann, P. V. Santos.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Experimental platform and CTC control scheme. (a) A non-resonant and a control cw laser are combined and focused onto a Ga(Al)As planar microcavity with acousto-optic distributed Bragg reflectors (aoDBRs) embedding GaAs quantum wells (QWs). Lateral micropatterning of the cavity spacer defines a photonic and phononic trapping potential Vph(x). (b) Energy diagram: hot carriers injected by the non-resonant la… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Experimental temporal coherence of the CTC with and without the control laser. (a–c) Control laser off. (a) Emission spectrum showing the CTC doublet with splitting νCTC ≈ 20 GHz. (b) ∣g (1) (τ)∣ showing oscillations at νCTC; red curve: Savitzky–Golay filter. (c) Fourier transform of ∣g (1) (τ)∣, normalized to the zero-frequency component, revealing a broad peak at νCTC with modest amplitude. (d–f) Control… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Theoretical description of the resonantly driven po￾lariton CTC. (a) Calculated phonon (top) and polariton (bottom) power spectra versus control laser detuning ∆νR (in units of νM); enhanced phonon intensity marks the onset of coherent mechani￾cal self-oscillation. Six regimes (1–6), separated by dashed lines, reproduce the experimental phase diagram of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    and P.V .S

    A.S.K. and P.V .S. acknowledge funding from the German DFG (grant 359162958). * Corresponding author: ignacio.carraro@ib.edu.ar † Corresponding author: alejandro.fainstein@ib.edu.ar ‡ Corresponding author: kuznetsov@pdi-berlin.de

  2. [2]

    Wilczek, Quantum Time Crystals, Phys

    F. Wilczek, Quantum Time Crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 160401 (2012)

    2012

  3. [3]

    Iemini, A

    F. Iemini, A. Russomanno, J. Keeling, M. Schir ´o, M. Dal- monte, and R. Fazio, Boundary Time Crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 035301 (2018)

    2018

  4. [4]

    B. Zhu, J. Marino, N. Y . Yao, M. D. Lukin, and E. A. Dem- ler, Dicke time crystals in driven-dissipative quantum many- body systems, New J. Phys.21, 073028 (2019)

    2019

  5. [5]

    D. V . Else, B. Bauer, and C. Nayak, Floquet Time Crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 090402 (2016)

    2016

  6. [6]

    Khemani, A

    V . Khemani, A. Lazarides, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, Phase Structure of Driven Quantum Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 250401 (2016)

    2016

  7. [7]

    Kongkhambut, J

    P. Kongkhambut, J. Lee, S. J. Kim, J. Mun, M. Kim, and J. Bae, Observation of a continuous time crystal, Science377, 670 (2022)

    2022

  8. [8]

    Autti, V

    S. Autti, V . B. Eltsov, and G. E. V olovik, AC Josephson effect between two superfluid time crystals, Nat. Mater.20, 171 (2021)

    2021

  9. [9]

    X. Wu, H. Zhang, L. Chen, Y . Wang, and J. Qian, Dissipa- tive time crystal in a strongly interacting Rydberg gas, Nat. Phys.20, 1389 (2024)

    2024

  10. [10]

    Greilich, N

    A. Greilich, N. E. Kopteva, A. N. Kamenskii, P. S. Sokolov, V . L. Korenev, and M. Bayer, Robust continuous time crys- tal in an electron-nuclear spin system, Nat. Phys.20, 631 6 (2024)

    2024

  11. [11]

    Rayanov, B

    K. Rayanov, B. L. Altshuler, Y . G. Rubo, and S. Flach, Fre- quency Combs with Weakly Lasing Exciton-Polariton Con- densates, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 193901 (2015)

    2015

  12. [12]

    A. V . Nalitov, H. Sigurdsson, S. Morina, Y . S. Krivosenko, I. V . Iorsh, Y . G. Rubo, A. V . Kavokin, and I. A. Shelykh, Op- tically trapped polariton condensates as semiclassical time crystals, Phys. Rev. A99, 033830 (2019)

    2019

  13. [13]

    Orfanakis, A

    K. Orfanakis, A. F. Tzortzakakis, D. Petrosyan, P. G. Sav- vidis, and H. Ohadi, Ultralong temporal coherence in op- tically trapped exciton-polariton condensates, Phys. Rev. B 103, 235313 (2021)

    2021

  14. [14]

    Carraro-Haddad, D

    I. Carraro-Haddad, D. L. Chafatinos, A. S. Kuznetsov, I. A. Papuccio-Fern´andez, A. A. Reynoso, A. E. Bruchhausen, K. Biermann, P. V . Santos, G. Usaj, and A. Fainstein, Solid- state continuous time crystal in a polariton condensate with a built-in mechanical clock, Science384, 995 (2024)

    2024

  15. [15]

    Greilich, N

    A. Greilich, N. E. Kopteva, V . L. Korenev, P. A. Haude, and M. Bayer, Exploring nonlinear dynamics in periodically driven time crystal from synchronization to chaotic motion, Nat. Commun.16, 2936 (2025)

    2025

  16. [16]

    J. T. M ¨akinen, P. J. Heikkinen, S. Autti, V . V . Zavjalov, and V . B. Eltsov, Continuous time crystal coupled to a mechan- ical mode as a cavity-optomechanics-like platform, Nat. Commun.16, 9050 (2025)

    2025

  17. [17]

    Gnusov, S

    I. Gnusov, S. Harrison, S. Alyatkin, K. Sitnik, J. T ¨opfer, H. Sigurdsson, and P. Lagoudakis, Quantum vortex formation in the ”rotating bucket” experiment with polariton conden- sates, Science Advances9, eadd1299 (2023)

    2023

  18. [18]

    del Valle-Inclan Redondo, C

    Y . del Valle-Inclan Redondo, C. Schneider, S. Klembt, S. H¨ofling, S. Tarucha, and M. D. Fraser, Optically driven ro- tation of exciton-polariton condensates, Nano Letters23, 4564 (2023)

    2023

  19. [19]

    A. V . Yulin, I. A. Shelykh, E. S. Sedov, and A. V . Kavokin, V orticity of polariton condensates in rotating traps, Phys. Rev. B108, 155301 (2023)

    2023

  20. [20]

    Barrat, A

    J. Barrat, A. F. Tzortzakakis, M. Niu, X. Zhou, G. G. Paschos, D. Petrosyan, and P. G. Savvidis, Qubit analog with polariton superfluid in an annular trap, Science Ad- vances10, 43 (2024)

    2024

  21. [21]

    Barrat, R

    J. Barrat, R. Cherbunin, E. Sedov, E. Aladinskaia, A. Li- ubomirov, V . Litvyak, M. Petrov, X. Zhou, Z. Hatzopoulos, A. Kavokin, and P. G. Savvidis, Stochastic circular persis- tent currents of exciton polaritons, Scientific Reports14, 12953 (2024)

    2024

  22. [22]

    Gnusov, A

    I. Gnusov, A. V . Yulin, S. Baryshev, S. Alyatkin, and P. G. Lagoudakis, Tailoring the resonant spin response of a stirred polariton condensate, Phys. Rev. B112, L201302 (2025)

    2025

  23. [23]

    S. S. Gavrilov, Towards spin turbulence of light: Sponta- neous disorder and chaos in cavity-polariton systems, Phys. Rev. B94, 195310 (2016)

    2016

  24. [24]

    S. S. Gavrilov, Polariton Chimeras: Bose-Einstein Con- densates with Intrinsic Chaoticity and Spontaneous Long- Range Ordering, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 033901 (2018)

    2018

  25. [25]

    Leblanc, G

    C. Leblanc, G. Malpuech, and D. D. Solnyshkov, High- frequency exciton-polariton clock generator, Phys. Rev. B 101, 115418 (2020)

    2020

  26. [26]

    Novokreschenov, A

    D. Novokreschenov, A. Kudlis, A. V . Kavokin, Classical and Single-Photon-Seeded Polarization Memories Based on Polariton Lasers, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 146902 (2026)

    2026

  27. [27]

    Coherence Revivals and Lifetime Extension of Polariton Condensates by Mirror-Mediated Self-Feedback

    I. Smirnov, S. Alyatkin, and P. G. Lagoudakis, Coherence revivals and lifetime extension of polariton condensates by mirror-mediated self-feedback, arXiv:2604.25743 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  28. [28]

    Fainstein, N

    A. Fainstein, N. D. Lanzillotti-Kimura, B. Jusserand, and B. Perrin, Strong optical-mechanical coupling in a vertical GaAs/AlAs microcavity for subterahertz phonons and near- infrared light, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 037403 (2013)

    2013

  29. [29]

    Trigo, A

    M. Trigo, A. Bruchhausen, A. Fainstein, B. Jusserand, and V . Thierry-Mieg, Confinement of acoustical vibrations in a semiconductor planar phonon cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 227402 (2002)

    2002

  30. [30]

    Rozas, A

    G. Rozas, A. E. Bruchhausen, A. Fainstein, B. Jusserand, and A. Lemaitre, Polariton path to fully resonant disper- sive coupling in optomechanical resonators, Phys. Rev. B 90, 201302(R) (2014)

    2014

  31. [31]

    Sesin, A

    P. Sesin, A. S. Kuznetsov, G. Rozas, S. Anguiano, A. E. Bruchhausen, A. Lemaitre, K. Biermann, P. V . Santos, and A. Fainstein, Giant optomechanical coupling and dephas- ing protection with cavity exciton-polaritons, Phys. Rev. Re- search5, L042035 (2023)

    2023

  32. [32]

    Winkler, J

    K. Winkler, J. Fischer, A. Schade, M. Amthor, Robert Dall, Jonas Gessler, M. Emmerling, E. A. Ostrovskaya, M. Kamp, C. Schneider, and S. H ¨ofling, A polariton condensate in a photonic crystal potential landscape, New J. Phys.17, 023001 (2015)

    2015

  33. [33]

    A. S. Kuznetsov, P. L. J. Helgers, K. Biermann, and P. V . Santos, Quantum confinement of exciton-polaritons in a structured (Al,Ga)As microcavity, Phys. Rev. B97, 195309 (2018)

    2018

  34. [34]

    A. S. Kuznetsov, K. Biermann, A. A. Reynoso, A. Fainstein, and P. V . Santos, Microcavity phonoritons—a coherent optical-to-microwave interface, Nat. Commun.14, 5470 (2023)

    2023

  35. [35]

    See Supplemental Material for sample, experimental and theoretical details, which includes Refs. [35–37]

  36. [36]

    A. S. Kuznetsov, I. Carraro-Haddad, G. Usaj, K. Bier- mann, A. Fainstein, and P. V . Santos, Ground-state exciton– polariton condensation via coherent Floquet driving, Nat. Photonics (2026)

    2026

  37. [37]

    D. L. Chafatinos, A. S. Kuznetsov, A. A. Reynoso, G. Usaj, P. Sesin, I. Papuccio-Fern ´andez, A. E. Bruchhausen, K. Biermann, P. V . Santos, and A. Fainstein, Asynchronous locking in metamaterials of fluids of light and sound, Nat. Commun.14, 3485 (2023)

    2023

  38. [38]

    Rozas, B

    G. Rozas, B. Jusserand, and A. Fainstein, Fabry-P ´erot- multichannel spectrometer tandem for ultra-high resolution Raman spectroscopy, Rev. Sci. Instrum.85, 013103 (2014)

    2014

  39. [39]

    Kasprzak, M

    J. Kasprzak, M. Richard, S. Kundermann, A. Baas, P. Jeam- brun, J. M. J. Keeling, F. Marchetti, M. H. Szyma ´nska, R. Andr´e, J. L. Staehli, V . Savona, P. B. Littlewood, B. De- veaud, and Le Si Dang, Bose-Einstein condensation of ex- citon polaritons, Nature443, 409 (2006)

    2006

  40. [40]

    Balili, V

    R. Balili, V . Hartwell, D. Snoke, L. Pfeiffer, and K. West, Bose-Einstein condensation of microcavity polaritons in a trap, Science316, 1007 (2007)

    2007

  41. [41]

    Ohadi, A

    H. Ohadi, A. Dreismann, Y . G. Rubo, F. Pinsker, Y . del Valle-Incl´an Redondo, S. I. Tsintzos, Z. Hatzopoulos, P. G. Savvidis, and J. J. Baumberg, Spontaneous spin bifurcations and ferromagnetic phase transitions in a spinor exciton- polariton condensate, Phys. Rev. X5, 031002 (2015)

    2015

  42. [42]

    I. Y . Chestnov, A. V . Kavokin, and A. V . Yulin, The optical control of phase locking of polariton condensates, New J. 7 Phys.21, 113009 (2019)

    2019

  43. [43]

    Navarro–Urrios, G

    D. Navarro–Urrios, G. Arregui, M. F. Colombano, J. Jaramillo–Fern´andez, A. Pitanti, A. Griol, L. Mercad ´e, A. Mart´ınez, and N. E. Capuj, Giant injection–locking band- width of a self-pulsing limit–cycle in an optomechanical cavity, Communications Physics5, 330 (2022)

    2022

  44. [44]

    Arumugam, Injection locking of Rydberg dissipative time crystals, Communications Physics9, 156 (2026)

    D. Arumugam, Injection locking of Rydberg dissipative time crystals, Communications Physics9, 156 (2026)

    2026

  45. [45]

    Ferrier, S

    L. Ferrier, S. Pigeon, E. Wertz, M. Bamba, P. Senellart, I. Sagnes, A. Lemaˆıtre, C. Ciuti, and J. Bloch, Polariton para- metric oscillation in a single micropillar cavity, Appl. Phys. Lett.97, 031105 (2010)

    2010

  46. [46]

    Carlon Zambon, S

    N. Carlon Zambon, S. R. K. Rodriguez, A. Lema ˆıtre, A. Harouri, L. Le Gratiet, I. Sagnes, P. St-Jean, S. Ravets, A. Amo, and J. Bloch, Parametric instability in coupled non- linear microcavities, Phys. Rev. A102, 023526 (2020)

    2020

  47. [47]

    Alonso–Tom ´as, G

    D. Alonso–Tom ´as, G. Arregui, L. Mercad ´e, A. Mart ´ınez, A. Griol, N. E. Capuj, and D. Navarro-Urrios, Cascaded in- jection locking of optomechanical crystal oscillators, APL Photonics9, 116108 (2024)

    2024

  48. [48]

    Beltramo, R

    G. Beltramo, R. Horv ´ath, G. Modica, and R. Braive, Injection-locking dynamics of two self–pulsing nanocavi- ties optically coupled on photonic integrated circuit, Com- munications Physics9, 12 (2026)

    2026

  49. [49]

    Wouters and I

    M. Wouters and I. Carusotto, Excitations in a Nonequilib- rium Bose-Einstein Condensate of Exciton Polaritons, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 140402 (2007)

    2007

  50. [50]

    Carusotto and C

    I. Carusotto and C. Ciuti, Quantum fluids of light, Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 299 (2013)

    2013

  51. [51]

    Fazio, J

    R. Fazio, J. Keeling, L. Mazza, and M. Schir `o, Many- body open quantum systems, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes99 (2025)

    2025

  52. [52]

    H. Deng, H. Haug, and Y . Yamamoto, Exciton-polariton Bose-Einstein condensation, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1489 (2010)

    2010

  53. [53]

    A. A. Reynoso, G. Usaj, D. L. Chafatinos, F. Mangussi, A. E. Bruchhausen, A. S. Kuznetsov, K. Biermann, P. V . San- tos, and A. Fainstein, Optomechanical parametric oscilla- tion of a quantum light-fluid in a lattice, Phys. Rev. B105, 195310 (2022)

    2022

  54. [54]

    I. A. Ramos-P ´erez, I. Carraro-Haddad, F. Fainstein, D. L. Chafatinos, G. Usaj, G. B. Mindlin, A. Fainstein, and A. A. Reynoso, Theory of optomechanical locking in driven- dissipative coupled polariton condensates, Phys. Rev. B 109, 165305 (2024)

    2024

  55. [55]

    D. L. Chafatinos, A. S. Kuznetsov, S. Anguiano, A. E. Bruchhausen, A. A. Reynoso, K. Biermann, P. V . Santos, and A. Fainstein, Polariton-driven phonon laser, Nat. Com- mun.11, 4552 (2020)

    2020

  56. [56]

    double magic coincidence

    L. Viotti, M. Huber, R. Fazio, and G. Manzano, Quantum Time Crystal Clock and Its Performance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 110401 (2026). 1 Supplementary Material for: Coherent Control of a Polariton Continuous Time Crystal SAMPLE DESIGN AND EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS Sample design The microcavity platform is based on the (Al,Ga)As material system, which exhibits a n...

    2026

This paper was first reviewed by grok-4.3 on June 26, 2026.