pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.22235 · v1 · pith:2FBRSCRZnew · submitted 2026-06-20 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Non-equilibrium angular momentum selectivity and filtering in chiral carbon nanotubes

Sergio Shmayev , D. R. da Costa , D. A. Bahamon This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 11:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords carbon nanotubeschiralityorbital angular momentumEdelstein susceptibilityquantum transportangular momentum filteringnon-equilibrium response
0
0 comments X

The pith

Chiral carbon nanotubes can filter orbital angular momentum when angular correlations are added to metallic contacts.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how structural chirality in carbon nanotubes affects non-equilibrium orbital responses in quantum transport. It shows that the orbital Edelstein susceptibility varies with chirality and diameter, leading to distinct response branches rather than a single scaling law. Metallic contacts influence this differently in metallic versus semiconducting tubes, with the latter showing interference effects. By modifying the contact self-energy to include angular correlations, the work demonstrates that these tubes can selectively transmit states matching their crystal angular momentum, acting as orbital filters.

Core claim

Chiral CNTs exhibit chirality- and diameter-dependent orbital Edelstein susceptibility forming distinct families based on the wrapping vector. Metallic CNTs recover intrinsic orbital response away from contacts, while semiconducting ones show oscillations from angular momentum interference. Incorporating angular correlations in the contact self-energy enables chiral CNTs to function as orbital-angular-momentum filters that transmit orbitally textured states according to propagating band angular momenta.

What carries the argument

Angular-correlated contact self-energy enabling selective transmission of states with matching crystal angular momentum.

If this is right

  • Orbital Edelstein susceptibility forms distinct branches for different chiral families.
  • Semiconducting CNTs exhibit oscillatory orbital response due to interference.
  • Chiral CNTs act as efficient orbital-angular-momentum filters with correlated contacts.
  • Metallic CNTs rapidly recover intrinsic orbital response away from contacts.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This filtering mechanism could be used to design devices for orbital information processing in one-dimensional systems.
  • Similar angular selectivity might be explored in other chiral quasi-one-dimensional materials.
  • The dependence on specific chiral vectors suggests selecting particular nanotube types for desired orbital responses.

Load-bearing premise

The wide-band metallic contact model with added angular correlations accurately represents real-device injection of transport channels without unaccounted interference or scattering effects.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of transmitted orbital current in a chiral CNT junction with and without angular correlations in the contact self-energy, checking for selectivity according to band angular momentum.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.22235 by D. A. Bahamon, D. R. da Costa, Sergio Shmayev.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) constitute a highly tunable platform for probing the interplay between structural chirality and quantum transport in quasi-one-dimensional systems. Here, we perform a systematic study of the non-equilibrium orbital response across a broad set of metallic and semiconducting chiral CNTs. We find that the orbital Edelstein susceptibility depends strongly on both chirality and nanotube diameter, revealing that the orbital response cannot be captured by a universal scaling law. Instead, distinct families of CNTs emerge, forming characteristic orbital-response branches uniquely determined by the chiral wrapping vector. We further investigate the role of metallic contacts on orbital-current generation and orbital selectivity. While metallic CNTs rapidly recover their intrinsic orbital response away from the contact region, semiconducting CNTs display pronounced oscillatory behavior arising from interference between transport channels carrying different angular momenta injected by wide-band metallic contacts. Finally, by incorporating angular correlations into the contact self-energy, we demonstrate that chiral CNTs can operate as efficient orbital-angular-momentum filters, selectively transmitting orbitally textured electronic states in accordance with the crystal angular momentum of the propagating bands.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript performs a systematic NEGF study of the non-equilibrium orbital Edelstein susceptibility across metallic and semiconducting chiral carbon nanotubes. It reports that the susceptibility depends strongly on chirality and diameter, forming distinct orbital-response branches fixed by the chiral wrapping vector rather than obeying a universal scaling law. Metallic contacts allow rapid recovery of the intrinsic response in metallic tubes but induce oscillatory interference in semiconducting tubes; adding angular correlations to the wide-band contact self-energy is shown to enable efficient orbital-angular-momentum filtering that transmits states matching the crystal angular momentum of the propagating bands.

Significance. If the NEGF results hold, the work establishes chiral CNTs as a platform for orbital-current selectivity and filtering, with chirality-specific branches providing a structural handle on orbital response. The explicit construction of an angular-momentum-selective contact self-energy and the resulting filtering demonstration constitute a concrete, falsifiable prediction for orbitronic devices. The absence of free parameters in the core model and the systematic coverage of many chiral vectors are strengths that strengthen the central claims.

minor comments (2)
  1. The wide-band contact model with added angular correlations is central to the filtering result; a brief comparison to alternative contact models (e.g., tight-binding leads) would strengthen the claim that the selectivity is robust rather than model-specific.
  2. Notation for crystal angular momentum and orbital Edelstein susceptibility should be defined explicitly on first use, with a short table or appendix listing the chiral indices examined.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive and accurate summary of our manuscript, the assessment of its significance, and the recommendation for minor revision. No specific major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained in NEGF model

full rationale

The paper's central results on orbital Edelstein susceptibility, contact effects, and OAM filtering are obtained from explicit NEGF transport calculations on chiral CNTs. The abstract and methodology describe computing responses across metallic/semiconducting tubes, observing chirality-dependent branches, and adding angular correlations to the wide-band self-energy to produce selectivity. These outcomes follow directly from the stated model equations and numerical implementation without any reduction to self-definitional quantities, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. The wide-band assumption and angular-correlation form are modeling choices whose consequences are computed, not presupposed by definition. No uniqueness theorems, ansatzes smuggled via citation, or renaming of known results are invoked as load-bearing steps. The derivation chain is therefore independent of its inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review limited to abstract; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted. The work presumably rests on standard domain assumptions of quantum transport theory (e.g., tight-binding electronic structure for CNTs and wide-band contact approximations) but these are not itemized.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5724 in / 1198 out tokens · 36783 ms · 2026-06-26T11:14:01.390348+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Yan, Structural chirality and electronic chirality in quantum materials, Annual Review of Materials Re- search54, 97 (2024)

    B. Yan, Structural chirality and electronic chirality in quantum materials, Annual Review of Materials Re- search54, 97 (2024)

    2024

  2. [2]

    C. D. Aiello, J. M. Abendroth, M. Abbas, A. Afana- sev, S. Agarwal, A. S. Banerjee, D. N. Beratan, J. N. Belling, B. Berche, A. Botana, J. R. Caram, G. L. Celardo, G. Cuniberti, A. Garcia-Etxarri, A. Dianat, I. Diez-Perez, Y. Guo, R. Gutierrez, C. Herrmann, J. Hi- hath, S. Kale, P. Kurian, Y.-C. Lai, T. Liu, A. Lopez, E. Medina, V. Mujica, R. Naaman, M. N...

    2022

  3. [3]

    B. P. Bloom, Y. Paltiel, R. Naaman, and D. H. Waldeck, Chiral induced spin selectivity, Chemical Reviews124, 1950 (2024)

    1950

  4. [4]

    Tokura and N

    Y. Tokura and N. Nagaosa, Nonreciprocal responses from non-centrosymmetric quantum materials, Nature Com- munications9, 3740 (2018)

    2018

  5. [5]

    G. L. J. A. Rikken and N. Avarvari, Comparing electrical magnetochiral anisotropy and chirality-induced spin se- lectivity, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters14, 9727 (2023)

    2023

  6. [6]

    Naaman, Y

    R. Naaman, Y. Paltiel, and D. H. Waldeck, Chiral molecules and the electron spin, Nature Reviews Chem- istry3, 250 (2019)

    2019

  7. [7]

    Evers, A

    F. Evers, A. Aharony, N. Bar-Gill, O. Entin-Wohlman, P. Hedeg˚ ard, O. Hod, P. Jelinek, G. Kamieniarz, M. Lemeshko, K. Michaeli, V. Mujica, R. Naaman, Y. Paltiel, S. Refaely-Abramson, O. Tal, J. Thijssen, M. Thoss, J. M. van Ruitenbeek, L. Venkataraman, D. H. Waldeck, B. Yan, and L. Kronik, Theory of chirality induced spin selectivity: Progress and challe...

    2022

  8. [8]

    Y. Liu, J. Xiao, J. Koo, and B. Yan, Chirality-driven topological electronic structure of DNA-like materials, Nature Materials20, 638 (2021)

    2021

  9. [9]

    G. L. J. A. Rikken, J. F¨ olling, and P. Wyder, Electrical magnetochiral anisotropy, Physical Review Letters87, 236602 (2001)

    2001

  10. [10]

    F. Pop, P. Auban-Senzier, E. Canadell, G. L. J. A. Rikken, and N. Avarvari, Electrical magnetochiral anisotropy in a bulk chiral molecular conductor, Nature Communications5, 3757 (2014)

    2014

  11. [11]

    Yokouchi, N

    T. Yokouchi, N. Kanazawa, A. Kikkawa, D. Morikawa, K. Shibata, T.-h. Arima, Y. Taguchi, F. Kagawa, and Y. Tokura, Electrical magnetochiral effect induced by chiral spin fluctuations, Nature Communications8, 866 (2017)

    2017

  12. [12]

    Ideue, K

    T. Ideue, K. Hamamoto, S. Koshikawa, M. Ezawa, S. Shimizu, Y. Kaneko, Y. Tokura, N. Nagaosa, and Y. Iwasa, Bulk rectification effect in a polar semicon- ductor, Nature Physics13, 578 (2017)

    2017

  13. [13]

    D. A. Bahamon, G. G´ omez-Santos, D. K. Efetov, and T. Stauber, Chirality probe of twisted bilayer graphene in the linear transport regime, Nano Letters24, 4478 (2024)

    2024

  14. [14]

    M. H. G. Kuhn, L. A. Silva, and D. A. Bahamon, Layer- resolved quantum transport in twisted bilayer graphene: Counterflow and machine learning predictions, Physical Review B111, 235425 (2025)

    2025

  15. [15]

    A. Inui, R. Aoki, Y. Nishiue, K. Shiota, Y. Kousaka, H. Shishido, D. Hirobe, M. Suda, J.-i. Ohe, J.-i. Kishine, H. M. Yamamoto, and Y. Togawa, Chirality-induced spin-polarized state of a chiral crystal crnb 3s6, Physical Review Letters124, 166602 (2020)

    2020

  16. [16]

    D. Jo, D. Go, G.-M. Choi, and H.-W. Lee, Spintronics meets orbitronics: Emergence of orbital angular momen- tum in solids, npj Spintronics2, 19 (2024)

    2024

  17. [17]

    D. Go, D. Jo, H.-W. Lee, M. Kl¨ aui, and Y. Mokrousov, Orbitronics: Orbital currents in solids, Europhysics Let- ters135, 37001 (2021)

    2021

  18. [18]

    T. Yoda, T. Yokoyama, and S. Murakami, Orbital edel- stein effect as a condensed-matter analog of solenoids, Nano Letters18, 916 (2018)

    2018

  19. [19]

    Y. Liu, J. Xiao, J. Koo, and B. Yan, Chirality-driven topological electronic structure of dna-like materials, Na- ture Materials20, 638 (2021)

    2021

  20. [20]

    B. Kim, D. Shin, S. Namgung, N. Park, K.-W. Kim, and J. Kim, Optoelectronic manifestation of orbital angular momentum driven by chiral hopping in helical se chains, ACS Nano17, 18873 (2023)

    2023

  21. [21]

    Hagiwara, Y.-J

    K. Hagiwara, Y.-J. Chen, D. Go, X. L. Tan, S. Gryt- siuk, K.-H. O. Yang, G.-J. Shu, J. Chien, Y.-H. Shen, X.-L. Huang, I. Cojocariu, V. Feyer, M.-T. Lin, S. Bl¨ ugel, C. M. Schneider, Y. Mokrousov, and C. Tusche, Orbital topology of chiral crystals for orbitronics, Advanced Ma- terials37, 2418040 (2025)

    2025

  22. [22]

    Bhowal and G

    S. Bhowal and G. Vignale, Orbital hall effect as an alter- native to valley hall effect in gapped graphene, Physical Review B103, 195309 (2021). 15

    2021

  23. [23]

    G¨ obel, L

    B. G¨ obel, L. Schimpf, and I. Mertig, Chirality-induced orbital edelstein effect in an analytically solvable model, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 033180 (2025)

    2025

  24. [24]

    Salemi, M

    L. Salemi, M. Berritta, and P. M. Oppeneer, Quantita- tive comparison of electrically induced spin and orbital polarizations in heavy-metal/3d-metal bilayers, Physical Review Materials5, 074407 (2021)

    2021

  25. [25]

    G¨ obel, I

    B. G¨ obel, I. Mertig, and S. Lounis, Chirality-induced se- lectivity of angular momentum by orbital edelstein ef- fect in carbon nanotubes, Communications Physics8, 395 (2025)

    2025

  26. [26]

    Charlier, X

    J.-C. Charlier, X. Blase, and S. Roche, Electronic and transport properties of nanotubes, Reviews of Modern Physics79, 677 (2007)

    2007

  27. [27]

    E. A. Laird, F. Kuemmeth, G. A. Steele, K. Grove- Rasmussen, J. Nyg˚ ard, K. Flensberg, and L. P. Kouwen- hoven, Quantum transport in carbon nanotubes, Reviews of Modern Physics87, 703 (2015)

    2015

  28. [29]

    Jarillo-Herrero, J

    P. Jarillo-Herrero, J. Kong, H. S. J. van der Zant, C. Dekker, L. P. Kouwenhoven, and S. De Franceschi, Orbital kondo effect in carbon nanotubes, Nature434, 484 (2005)

    2005

  29. [30]

    Miyamoto, S

    Y. Miyamoto, S. G. Louie, and M. L. Cohen, Chiral conductivities of nanotubes, Physical Review Letters76, 2121 (1996)

    1996

  30. [31]

    Miyamoto, A

    Y. Miyamoto, A. Rubio, S. G. Louie, and M. L. Cohen, Self-inductance of chiral conducting nanotubes, Physical Review B60, 13885 (1999)

    1999

  31. [32]

    C. J. Lambert, S. W. D. Bailey, and J. Cserti, Oscillating chiral currents in nanotubes: A route to nanoscale mag- netic test tubes, Physical Review B78, 233405 (2008)

    2008

  32. [33]

    Marganska, P

    M. Marganska, P. Chudzinski, and M. Grifoni, The two classes of low-energy spectra in finite carbon nanotubes, Physical Review B92, 075433 (2015)

    2015

  33. [34]

    Izumida, R

    W. Izumida, R. Okuyama, and R. Saito, Valley coupling in finite-length metallic single-wall carbon nanotubes, Physical Review B91, 235442 (2015)

    2015

  34. [35]

    Izumida, R

    W. Izumida, R. Okuyama, A. Yamakage, and R. Saito, Angular momentum and topology in semiconducting single-wall carbon nanotubes, Physical Review B93, 195442 (2016)

    2016

  35. [36]

    Marga´ nska, D

    M. Marga´ nska, D. R. Schmid, A. Dirnaichner, P. L. Stiller, C. Strunk, M. Grifoni, and A. K. H¨ uttel, Shap- ing electron wave functions in a carbon nanotube with a parallel magnetic field, Physical Review Letters122, 086802 (2019)

    2019

  36. [37]

    J. T. Frey and D. J. Doren, Tubegen 3.4,http: //turin.nss.udel.edu/research/tubegenonline.html (2011), web interface, University of Delaware, Newark, DE

    2011

  37. [38]

    Saito, G

    R. Saito, G. Dresselhaus, and M. S. Dresselhaus,Physical Properties of Carbon Nanotubes(Imperial College Press, London, 1998)

    1998

  38. [39]

    M. S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, R. Saito, and A. Jorio, Group Theory: Application to the Physics of Condensed Matter(Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2008)

    2008

  39. [40]

    C. T. White and J. W. Mintmire, Fundamental properties of single-wall carbon nanotubes, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B109, 52 (2005)

    2005

  40. [41]

    Reich, C

    S. Reich, C. Thomsen, and J. Maultzsch,Carbon Nanotubes: Basic Concepts and Physical Properties (WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany, 2004)

    2004

  41. [42]

    Datta,Electronic Transport in Mesoscopic Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995)

    S. Datta,Electronic Transport in Mesoscopic Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995)

    1995

  42. [43]

    D. A. Bahamon, G. G´ omez-Santos, and T. Stauber, Emergent magnetic texture in driven twisted bilayer graphene, Nanoscale12, 15383 (2020)

    2020

  43. [44]

    Haug and A.-P

    H. Haug and A.-P. Jauho,Quantum Kinetics in Trans- port and Optics of Semiconductors, 2nd ed. (Springer- Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2008)

    2008

  44. [45]

    Peierls, Zur Theorie des Diamagnetismus von Leitungselektronen, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik80, 763 (1933)

    R. Peierls, Zur Theorie des Diamagnetismus von Leitungselektronen, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik80, 763 (1933)

    1933

  45. [46]

    D. A. Bahamon, A. H. Castro Neto, and V. M. Pereira, Effective contact model for geometry-independent con- ductance calculations in graphene, Physical Review B88, 235433 (2013)

    2013

  46. [47]

    Nemec, D

    N. Nemec, D. Tom´ anek, and G. Cuniberti, Contact de- pendence of carrier injection in carbon nanotubes: An ab initio study, Physical Review Letters96, 076802 (2006)

    2006

  47. [48]

    Tersoff, Contact resistance of carbon nanotubes, Ap- plied Physics Letters74, 2122 (1999)

    J. Tersoff, Contact resistance of carbon nanotubes, Ap- plied Physics Letters74, 2122 (1999)

    1999

  48. [49]

    Z. Chen, J. Appenzeller, J. Knoch, Y.-m. Lin, and P. Avouris, The role of metal–nanotube contact in the performance of carbon nanotube field-effect transistors, Nano Letters5, 1497 (2005)

    2005

  49. [50]

    Zhang, L

    S. Zhang, L. Kang, X. Wang, L. Tong, L. Yang, Z. Wang, K. Qi, S. Deng, Q. Li, X. Bai, F. Ding, and J. Zhang, Arrays of horizontal carbon nanotubes of controlled chi- rality grown using designed catalysts, Nature543, 234 (2017)

    2017

  50. [51]

    Blase, L

    X. Blase, L. X. Benedict, E. L. Shirley, and S. G. Louie, Hybridization effects and metallicity in small radius car- bon nanotubes, Physical Review Letters72, 1878 (1994)

    1994

  51. [52]

    Salemi and P

    L. Salemi and P. M. Oppeneer, First-principles theory of intrinsic spin and orbital hall and nernst effects in metallic monoatomic crystals, Physical Review Materials 6, 095001 (2022)

    2022

  52. [53]

    Kataura, Y

    H. Kataura, Y. Kumazawa, Y. Maniwa, I. Umezu, S. Suzuki, Y. Ohtsuka, and Y. Achiba, Optical proper- ties of single-wall carbon nanotubes, Synthetic Metals 103, 2555 (1999), international Conference on Science and Technology of Synthetic Metals

    1999

  53. [54]

    Reich, C

    S. Reich, C. Thomsen, and J. Maultzsch,Carbon Nan- otubes: Basic Concepts and Physical Properties(John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Weinheim, Germany, 2004) Chap. 4, pp. 67–83

    2004

  54. [55]

    E. D. Minot, Y. Yaish, V. Sazonova, and P. L. McEuen, Determination of electron orbital magnetic moments in carbon nanotubes, Nature428, 536 (2004)

    2004

  55. [56]

    Ajiki and T

    H. Ajiki and T. Ando, Magnetic properties of carbon nan- otubes, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan62, 2470 (1993)

    1993

  56. [57]

    S. M. Bachilo, M. S. Strano, C. Kittrell, R. H. Hauge, R. E. Smalley, and R. B. Weisman, Structure-assigned optical spectra of single-walled carbon nanotubes, Sci- ence298, 2361 (2002)

    2002

  57. [58]

    G. Y. Slepyan, S. A. Maksimenko, A. Lakhtakia, O. M. Yevtushenko, and A. V. Gusakov, Electronic and elec- tromagnetic properties of nanotubes, Physical Review B 57, 9485 (1998)

    1998

  58. [59]

    B. Wang, R. Chu, J. Wang, and H. Guo, First-principles calculation of chiral current and quantum self-inductance of carbon nanotubes, Physical Review B80, 235430 (2009). 16

    2009

  59. [60]

    J. W. Mintmire and C. T. White, Universal density of states for carbon nanotubes, Physical Review Letters81, 2506 (1998)

    1998

  60. [61]

    J. J. Palacios, A. J. P´ erez-Jim´ enez, E. Louis, E. San- Fabi´ an, and J. A. Verg´ es, First-principles phase-coherent transport in metallic nanotubes with realistic contacts, Physical Review Letters90, 106801 (2003)

    2003

  61. [62]

    Nemec, D

    N. Nemec, D. Tom´ anek, and G. Cuniberti, Modeling extended contacts for nanotube and graphene devices, Physical Review B77, 125420 (2008)

    2008

  62. [63]

    Y. Chen, O. Hod, J. Gersten, and A. Nitzan, Chirality- induced orbital-angular-momentum selectivity in elec- tron transmission and scattering, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation22, 20 (2026)

    2026

  63. [64]

    Chen and O

    Y. Chen and O. Hod, Chirality induced spin selectiv- ity: A classical spin-off, The Journal of Chemical Physics 158, 244102 (2023)

    2023

  64. [65]

    Trocha, Beating in electronic transport through quan- tum dot based devices, Physical Review B82, 115320 (2010)

    P. Trocha, Beating in electronic transport through quan- tum dot based devices, Physical Review B82, 115320 (2010)

    2010

  65. [66]

    F. M. Souza, Spin-dependent ringing and beats in a quan- tum dot system, Physical Review B76, 205315 (2007)

    2007

  66. [67]

    E. B. Barros, A. Jorio, G. G. Samsonidze, R. B. Ca- paz, A. G. Souza Filho, J. Mendes Filho, G. Dressel- haus, and M. S. Dresselhaus, Review on the symmetry- related properties of carbon nanotubes, Physics Reports 431, 261 (2006)

    2006

  67. [68]

    Streib, Difference between angular momentum and pseudoangular momentum, Physical Review B103, L100409 (2021)

    S. Streib, Difference between angular momentum and pseudoangular momentum, Physical Review B103, L100409 (2021)

    2021

  68. [69]

    C. T. White, D. H. Robertson, and J. W. Mintmire, Helical and rotational symmetries of nanoscale graphitic tubules, Physical Review B47, 5485(R) (1993)

    1993

  69. [70]

    Mintmire and C

    J. Mintmire and C. White, Electronic and structural properties of carbon nanotubes, Carbon33, 893 (1995), nanotubes

    1995

  70. [71]

    A. M. Lunde, K. Flensberg, and A.-P. Jauho, Intershell resistance in multiwall carbon nanotubes: A coulomb drag study, Physical Review B71, 125408 (2005)

    2005

  71. [72]

    Allen, M

    L. Allen, M. W. Beijersbergen, R. J. C. Spreeuw, and J. P. Woerdman, Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of laguerre-gaussian laser modes, Physical Review A45, 8185 (1992)

    1992