pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.22265 · v1 · pith:JUS5UVP6new · submitted 2026-06-20 · ⚛️ physics.acc-ph · hep-ex· nucl-ex· physics.ins-det

Quantum noninvasive three-component beam-spin polarimetry in the Hadron Storage Ring of the Electron-Ion Collider

Frank Rathmann This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 10:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.acc-ph hep-exnucl-exphysics.ins-det
keywords SQUID polarimeternoninvasive measurementbeam polarizationEIC Hadron Storage Ringspin precessionpolarization vector reconstructionfree induction decay
0
0 comments X

The pith

A proposed three-channel SQUID polarimeter reconstructs the full polarization vector of proton bunches noninvasively, including the longitudinal component inaccessible to scattering methods.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a SQUID-based polarimeter that measures the complete polarization vector of proton bunches in the EIC's Hadron Storage Ring without disturbing the beam. It uses three channels to capture transverse and longitudinal components via magnetic signals at specific frequencies tied to the spin tune. A dynamic mode uses small kicks to induce signals that are summed coherently for high precision. This approach makes the longitudinal polarization accessible, which scattering methods cannot measure due to parity conservation. The design supports continuous monitoring and precise magnitude checks with minimal beam loss.

Core claim

The six-snake HSR lattice places the spin precession at half revolution frequency, allowing three pickup channels consisting of cosine-θ and sine-θ saddle loops and an axial gradiometer to reconstruct the full polarization vector (Px, Py, Pz) bunch by bunch. In static mode this provides continuous noninvasive monitoring including Pz. In dynamic mode a longitudinal kicker tips a fraction of the polarization to produce a free-induction-decay signal that is coherently summed across bunches using a matched filter, achieving 1% precision in about 5 minutes at flattop with only 10^{-4} loss per cycle.

What carries the argument

Three pickup channels (cosine-θ and sine-θ saddle loops for transverse components, coaxial axial gradiometer for longitudinal) combined with matched-filter coherent summing of free-induction-decay signals.

If this is right

  • The full polarization vector can be monitored continuously bunch by bunch over an hours-long fill.
  • Longitudinal polarization Pz becomes measurable, unlike in single-spin scattering polarimetry.
  • Dynamic mode delivers δP/P = 1% precision in 5 minutes at flattop with negligible loss per cycle.
  • The architecture works for deuteron and 3He beams using species-specific factors.
  • It applies to storage-ring searches for electric dipole moments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Real-time polarization data could enable active feedback systems to maintain beam polarization during storage.
  • Similar SQUID setups might be tested at existing storage rings to validate the coherence assumptions before EIC operation.
  • Combining this with other beam diagnostics could provide a more complete picture of spin dynamics in the ring.

Load-bearing premise

The effective rms spin-tune spread remains at 10^{-3} to give the coherence time needed for the matched filter to reach 1% precision in the quoted times.

What would settle it

An experimental determination that the actual spin-tune spread exceeds 10^{-3} by enough to shorten the coherence time below the level required for coherent summing to yield 1% accuracy within 5 minutes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.22265 by Frank Rathmann.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic of the spin-precession geometry for a guide field along the vertical direction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Conceptual schematic of the three-channel SQUID pickup basis on a common cylin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Schematic layout of the EIC HSR in hexagonal representation. The six interaction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Numerical spin lattice for the hexagonal six-snake model introduced in Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Spectral search with the SQUID polarimeter at injection energy: the precession [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Operational analysis of the spin-tune spectral search. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Functional layout of the tip-π-echo-restore sequence. The measurement station con￾tains the longitudinal kicker (which delivers the tip, π, and restore pulses) and the SQUID pickup. The tipping pulse at t = 0 creates the transverse spin component; the π pulse at t = τ reflects the phase fan; the echo maximum is sampled near t ≃ 2τ ; and the restore pulse, fired after sampling, returns the polarization to t… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Simplified rotating-frame phase-fan picture of the FID and spin-echo sequence. Each [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Continuous SQUID readout for the full tip- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Magnetic-field pattern of a transverse magnetic dipole before and after a Lorentz [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Schematic illustration of the matched-filter correction for a representative subset [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: SNR as a function of integration time T for the matched filter at injection and flattop, for the operating-point transverse polarization P⊥ = P sin α = 0.021 ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Schematic pickup-basis geometries used to illustrate the three magnetic-field channels [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Radial field component Br(ϕ, z) on the cylindrical pickup surface, shown in unwrapped-cylinder coordinates for the three static dipole orientations. These three symme￾try classes form the natural field basis for the cosine-θ, sine-θ, and axial pickup channels. The transverse components are first-harmonic angular modes on the pickup cylinder, while the longitudinal component is independent of ϕ. The natura… view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Single-passage waveform classes after finite bunch-length convolution: (a) unipolar [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Per-bunch versus all-bunch matched-filter precision at flattop ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p054_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Bunch-resolved polarization history over an 8-hour EIC HSR fill at flattop. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p055_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Turn-by-turn evolution of the spin components under the action of a resonant RF [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p064_18.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose a noninvasive SQUID-based polarimeter for the polarized proton beam in the Electron-Ion Collider (EIC) Hadron Storage Ring (HSR), exploiting the collective magnetic dipole moment of the bunches rather than scattering. The six-snake HSR lattice has synchronous-particle spin tune $\nu_s = 1/2$, placing the in-plane spin-precession signal at half the revolution frequency ($\sim$39 kHz), in the DC SQUID band. Three pickup channels (cosine-$\theta$ and sine-$\theta$ saddle loops for the transverse components, a coaxial axial gradiometer for the longitudinal one) reconstruct the full polarization vector $(P_x, P_y, P_z)$ in two complementary modes. Static mode, the default for continuous noninvasive monitoring, reads all three components: $P_y$ at the revolution frequency and the residual in-plane components at $\nu_s f_\mathrm{rev}$, bunch by bunch over an hours-long fill, including $P_z$, inaccessible to single-spin scattering polarimetry by parity conservation. Dynamic mode gives a precise polarization-magnitude measurement: a longitudinal kicker tips a small fraction of the polarization into the horizontal (ring) plane to produce a free-induction-decay (FID) signal, and many phase-locked tip-$\pi$-echo-restore cycles are summed coherently via a matched filter across all bunches, with $\mathcal{O}(\alpha^2/\pi^2) \sim 10^{-4}$ loss per cycle, negligible over a full $\delta P/P = 1\%$ measurement. For tipping angle $\alpha = 30$ mrad, polarization $P = 0.7$, and effective rms spin-tune spread $\sigma_{\nu_s}^\mathrm{eff} = 10^{-3}$ (coherence time $\sim$2 ms), the integration time to reach $\delta P/P = 1\%$ is about 18 s at injection and 5 min at flattop. The architecture extends to deuteron and $^3$He beams via species-specific spin-magnetic factors, with applications to storage-ring EDM searches.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a noninvasive SQUID-based polarimeter for the polarized proton beam in the EIC Hadron Storage Ring, using three pickup channels (saddle loops and axial gradiometer) to reconstruct the full polarization vector (P_x, P_y, P_z) bunch by bunch from the collective magnetic dipole moment. Static mode provides continuous monitoring at revolution and spin-tune frequencies (including P_z, inaccessible to scattering methods), while dynamic mode employs a longitudinal kicker to generate FID signals that are coherently summed via matched filter across bunches, with O(α²/π²) loss per cycle. Performance claims include δP/P = 1% in ~18 s at injection and ~5 min at flattop for α = 30 mrad, P = 0.7, and σ_νs^eff = 10^{-3}.

Significance. If the assumptions hold, the proposal offers a significant new diagnostic capability for continuous, noninvasive, three-component polarimetry in the EIC HSR, including the longitudinal component. It could support beam operations and extend to deuteron and ³He beams for storage-ring EDM searches, with quantitative estimates tied to the six-snake lattice.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract (dynamic mode)] Abstract (dynamic-mode performance estimate): The quoted integration times to reach δP/P = 1% rely directly on the inserted value σ_νs^eff = 10^{-3} (coherence time ~2 ms) to enable matched-filter coherent summation across bunches. No lattice calculation, measurement, or sensitivity analysis is supplied to justify this effective rms spin-tune spread for the six-snake HSR under the stated conditions (α = 30 mrad, P = 0.7). This parameter is load-bearing for the central performance claims; if the true spread is larger, the coherent gain and integration times scale accordingly.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The scaling O(α²/π²) ~ 10^{-4} for loss per cycle is stated without derivation or reference; a brief inline explanation would improve accessibility for readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and for identifying a key assumption in our performance estimates. We respond to the major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract (dynamic mode)] Abstract (dynamic-mode performance estimate): The quoted integration times to reach δP/P = 1% rely directly on the inserted value σ_νs^eff = 10^{-3} (coherence time ~2 ms) to enable matched-filter coherent summation across bunches. No lattice calculation, measurement, or sensitivity analysis is supplied to justify this effective rms spin-tune spread for the six-snake HSR under the stated conditions (α = 30 mrad, P = 0.7). This parameter is load-bearing for the central performance claims; if the true spread is larger, the coherent gain and integration times scale accordingly.

    Authors: We agree that σ_νs^eff is a load-bearing assumption for the dynamic-mode integration times and that the manuscript provides no explicit lattice calculation or measurement to support the specific value of 10^{-3}. This value was selected as a representative figure consistent with spin-tune spreads achievable in snake-based lattices when operating near the spin-tune resonance condition ν_s = 1/2. To strengthen the presentation, we will add a sensitivity analysis in the revised manuscript (both in the abstract and in a dedicated subsection) that explicitly shows how the quoted integration times scale with σ_νs^eff. This will allow readers to rescale the results for any other assumed spread without altering the core proposal. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: performance estimates use external parameter assumptions, not self-referential derivations

full rationale

The paper's central claims involve a proposed SQUID polarimeter architecture and performance estimates derived from stated inputs (α=30 mrad, P=0.7, σ_νs^eff=10^{-3}). These are forward calculations from assumed lattice/detector parameters rather than quantities defined by the result itself. No equations reduce by construction to prior fits, no self-citations bear load on uniqueness theorems, and no ansatz is smuggled via prior work. The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks with no evident reduction of outputs to inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proposal rests on domain assumptions about the HSR lattice spin tune and SQUID operating band, plus several example numerical parameters used to compute integration times; no new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (3)
  • effective rms spin-tune spread σ_νs^eff = 10^{-3}
    Value 10^{-3} is used to set coherence time and calculate dynamic-mode integration time to 1% precision.
  • tipping angle α = 30 mrad
    Value 30 mrad is used in the loss-per-cycle and sensitivity estimate for dynamic mode.
  • beam polarization P = 0.7
    Value 0.7 is inserted into the signal-strength calculation for the 1% precision estimate.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The six-snake HSR lattice produces synchronous-particle spin tune ν_s = 1/2, placing the in-plane precession signal at half the revolution frequency (~39 kHz).
    This places the signal inside the DC SQUID band and enables the frequency separation described.
  • domain assumption SQUID sensors and the three specified pickup geometries (cosine-θ, sine-θ saddle loops, coaxial axial gradiometer) can detect the collective dipole fields from the bunches at the required sensitivity.
    This underpins both static and dynamic mode operation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5934 in / 1777 out tokens · 65393 ms · 2026-06-26T10:29:15.241159+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Rathmann, A

    F. Rathmann, A. Nass, K. O. Eyser, V. Shmakova, E. C. Aschenauer, G. Atoian, A. Can- navo, X. Chu, K. Hock, H. Huang, H. Lovelace, G. Mahler, N. N. Nikolaev, J. Rit- ter, G. Robert-Demolaize, V. Schoefer, P. Shanmuganathan, E. Shulga, H. Soltner, and Z. Zhang. Eliminating beam-induced depolarizing effects in the hydrogen jet target for high-precision prot...

    work page doi:10.1103/8nh5-l63q 2026

  2. [2]

    Rathmann, O

    F. Rathmann, O. Eyser, M. Sangroula, P. Shanmuganathan, and V. Shmakova. Thermal and electromechanical response of ultra-thin carbon-strip polarimeter targets in relativistic bunched beams. Technical report, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA, June 2026. Submitted as a BNL Technical Note (June 17, 2026)

    2026

  3. [3]

    EIC global system requirements, 2022

    Brookhaven National Laboratory / Jefferson Lab. EIC global system requirements, 2022. URL:https://eic.jlab.org/Requirements/GLOBAL.html

    2022

  4. [4]

    Schoefer, E.C

    V. Schoefer, E.C. Aschenauer, H. Huang, F. M` eot, V. Ptitsyn, and V. H. Ranjbar. Stable spin direction measurements at RHIC with polarized proton beams. Technical Report BNL-225293-2024-TECH C-A/AP/703, Brookhaven National Laboratory, January 2024

    2024

  5. [5]

    Rathmann, B

    F. Rathmann, B. von Przewoski, W. A. Dezarn, J. Doskow, M. Dzemidzic, W. Haeberli, J. G. Hardie, B. Lorentz, H. O. Meyer, P. V. Pancella, R. E. Pollock, T. Rinckel, F. Sperisen, and T. Wise. Complete angular distribution measurements of pp spin correlation parameters Axx, A yy,andA xz and analyzing powerA y at 197.4 mev.Phys. Rev. C, 58:658–673, Aug 1998....

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.58.658 1998

  6. [6]

    Ya. S. Derbenev. Rf-resonance beam polarimeter. InThe 11th International Symposium on High Energy Spin Physics, volume 343 ofAIP Conference Proceedings, pages 264–272. American Institute of Physics, 1995.doi:10.1063/1.48865

    work page doi:10.1063/1.48865 1995

  7. [7]

    Conte, M

    M. Conte, M. Pusterla, and G. Pucacco. The stern-gerlach interaction between a traveling particle and a time varying magnetic field. 2000.arXiv:physics/0003069

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  8. [8]

    P. R. Cameron, M. Conte, N. D’Imperio, W. Franklin, D. A. Goldberg, A. Luccio, W. W. MacKay, M. Palazzi, M. Pusterla, K. Vetter, and T. Zwart. Design and test of a prototype cavity for a stern-gerlach polarimeter. Technical report, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, March 2005

    2005

  9. [9]

    Relativistic Stern-Gerlach Deflection

    Richard Talman. Relativistic Stern-Gerlach deflection.arXiv preprint, arXiv:1611.03810, 2016.doi:10.48550/arXiv.1611.03810

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.03810 2016

  10. [10]

    S. R. Mane. Relativistic Stern-Gerlach deflection: Hamiltonian formulation.arXiv preprint, arXiv:1611.07326, 2016.doi:10.48550/arXiv.1611.07326

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.07326 2016

  11. [11]

    P. R. Cameron, A. U. Luccio, T. J. Shea, and D. A. Goldberg. Squids, snakes, and po- larimeters: A new technique for measuring the magnetic moments of polarized beams. In High Energy Spin Physics: 12th International Symposium, volume 390 ofAIP Conference Proceedings, pages 306–315. American Institute of Physics, 1997.doi:10.1063/1.51839

    work page doi:10.1063/1.51839 1997

  12. [12]

    Morse, Cenap Ozben, Vincent Schoefer, Yannis K

    Younggeun Kim, Themis Bowcock, Dmitry Budker, Giovanni Cantatore, Hooman Davoudi- asl, Dmitry Denisov, Abhay Deshpande, Wolfram Fischer, Selcuk Haciomeroglu, Haixin Huang, David Kawall, Alexander Keshavarzi, On Kim, Ivan Koop, Valeri Lebedev, Jonathan Lee, William M. Morse, Cenap Ozben, Vincent Schoefer, Yannis K. Se- mertzidis, Eleftherios Skordis, Edwar...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  13. [13]

    Eversmann, V

    D. Eversmann, V. Hejny, F. Hinder, A. Kacharava, J. Pretz, F. Rathmann, M. Rosen- thal, F. Trinkel, S. Andrianov, W. Augustyniak, Z. Bagdasarian, M. Bai, W. Bernreuther, S. Bertelli, M. Berz, J. Bsaisou, S. Chekmenev, D. Chiladze, G. Ciullo, M. Contalbrigo, J. de Vries, S. Dymov, R. Engels, F. M. Esser, O. Felden, M. Gaisser, R. Gebel, H. Gl¨ uckler, F. G...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.094801 2015

  14. [14]

    Guidoboni et al

    G. Guidoboni et al. Connection between zero chromaticity and long in-plane polarization lifetime in a magnetic storage ring.Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams, 21:024201, 2018.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.21.024201. 58

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.21.024201 2018

  15. [15]

    Saleev, N

    A. Saleev, N. N. Nikolaev, F. Rathmann, W. Augustyniak, Z. Bagdasarian, M. Bai, L. Bar- ion, M. Berz, S. Chekmenev, G. Ciullo, S. Dymov, D. Eversmann, M. Gaisser, R. Gebel, K. Grigoryev, D. Grzonka, G. Guidoboni, D. Heberling, V. Hejny, N. Hempelmann, J. Het- zel, F. Hinder, A. Kacharava, V. Kamerdzhiev, I. Keshelashvili, I. Koop, A. Kulikov, A. Lehrach, ...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevaccelbeams 2017

  16. [16]

    Hempelmann et al

    N. Hempelmann et al. Phase measurement for driven spin oscillations in a storage ring. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams, 21:042002, 2018.doi:10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.21.042002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.21.042002 2018

  17. [17]

    Rathmann, N

    F. Rathmann, N. N. Nikolaev, and J. Slim. Spin dynamics investigations for the electric dipole moment experiment.Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams, 23:024601, 2020.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevAccelBeams.23.024601

    2020

  18. [18]

    Abusaif et al.Storage ring to search for electricdipole moments of charged particles: Fea- sibility study

    F. Abusaif et al.Storage ring to search for electricdipole moments of charged particles: Fea- sibility study. CERN, Geneva, 6 2021.arXiv:1912.07881,doi:10.23731/CYRM-2021-003

    work page doi:10.23731/cyrm-2021-003 2021

  19. [19]

    J. Slim, F. Rathmann, A. Andres, V. Hejny, A. Nass, A. Kacharava, P. Lenisa, N. N. Niko- laev, J. Pretz, A. Saleev, V. Shmakova, H. Soltner, F. Abusaif, A. Aggarwal, A. Aksentev, B. Alberdi, L. Barion, I. Bekman, M. Beyß, C. B¨ ohme, B. Breitkreutz, N. Canale, G. Ciullo, S. Dymov, N.-O. Fr¨ ohlich, R. Gebel, M. Gaisser, K. Grigoryev, D. Grzonka, J. Hetzel...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch 2025

  20. [20]

    Anastassopoulos, S

    V. Anastassopoulos, S. Andrianov, R. Baartman, S. Baessler, M. Bai, J. Benante, M. Berz, M. Blaskiewicz, T. Bowcock, K. Brown, B. Casey, M. Conte, J. D. Crnkovic, N. D’Imperio, G. Fanourakis, A. Fedotov, P. Fierlinger, W. Fischer, M. O. Gaisser, Y. Giomataris, M. Grosse-Perdekamp, G. Guidoboni, S. Hacı¨ omero˘ glu, G. Hoffstaetter, H. Huang, M. Incagli, A...

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4967465/ 2016

  21. [21]

    C. Liu, J. Kewisch, H. Huang, and M. Minty. Minimization of spin tune spread for preservation of spin polarization at rhic.Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams, 22:061002, 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.22.061002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.22.061002 2019

  22. [22]

    Luo and W

    Y. Luo and W. Fischer. Beam–beam observations in the rhic, 2014.arXiv:1410.5936

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  23. [23]

    Hamwi et al

    E. Hamwi et al. Snake matching the eic’s hadron storage ring. InProceedings of IPAC’24, page TUPS33, 2024.doi:10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2024-TUPS33

    work page doi:10.18429/jacow-ipac2024-tups33 2024

  24. [24]

    Hoffstaetter

    Eiad Hamwi and Georg H. Hoffstaetter. Polarization transmission in the Electron-Ion Collider’s Hadron Storage Ring. 2025. URL:https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.18558, arXiv:2509.18558

    arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Ptitsyn and J

    V. Ptitsyn and J. S. Berg. EIC hadron spin rotators. InProc. 13th Int. Particle Accelera- tor Conf. (IPAC’22), page WEPOST020, 2022. URL:https://proceedings.jacow.org/ ipac2022/papers/wepost020.pdf

    2022

  26. [26]

    N. J. Stone. Table of nuclear magnetic dipole and electric quadrupole moments.At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 111–112:1–28, 2016.doi:10.1016/j.adt.2015.12.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.adt.2015.12.002 2016

  27. [27]

    P. J. Mohr, D. B. Newell, and B. N. Taylor. CODATA recommended values of the fun- damental physical constants: 2014.Rev. Mod. Phys., 88:035009, 2016.doi:10.1103/ RevModPhys.88.035009

    2014

  28. [28]

    Bargmann, L

    V. Bargmann, L. Michel, and V. L. Telegdi. Precession of the polarization of particles moving in a homogeneous electromagnetic field.Phys. Rev. Lett., 2:435, 1959.doi:10. 1103/PhysRevLett.2.435

    1959

  29. [29]

    Takeshi Fukuyamma and Alexander J. Silenko. Derivation of generalized Thomas–Bargmann–Michel–Telegdi equation for a particle with electric dipole mo- ment.International Journal of Modern Physics A, 28(29):1350147, 2013.arXiv:https: //doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X13501479,doi:10.1142/S0217751X13501479

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x13501479 2013

  30. [30]

    Ptitsyn and J

    V. Ptitsyn and J. S. Berg. EIC hadron spin rotators. InProc. 13th International Particle Accelerator Conference (IPAC2022), pages 1734–1736, Geneva, Switzerland, 2022. JACoW Publishing. Paper WEPOST020. URL:https://proceedings.jacow.org/ipac2022/ papers/wepost020.pdf,doi:10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2022-WEPOST020

    work page doi:10.18429/jacow-ipac2022-wepost020 2022

  31. [31]

    Householder

    Alston S. Householder. Unitary triangularization of a nonsymmetric matrix.J. ACM, 5(4):339–342, October 1958.doi:10.1145/320941.320947

    work page doi:10.1145/320941.320947 1958

  32. [32]

    S. Y. Lee and E. D. Courant. Tolerance of imperfections in high-energy circular accelerators for polarized protons.Phys. Rev. D, 41:292–302, Jan 1990. URL:https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.41.292,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.41.292

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.41.292 1990

  33. [33]

    Eiad Hamwi.Spin Polarization, Modeling, and Beam Control in Hadron Accelerators: For RHIC and the EIC. Ph.d. dissertation, Cornell University, December 2025

    2025

  34. [34]

    S. Y. Lee.Spin Dynamics and Snakes in Synchrotrons. World Scientific, Singapore, 1997. doi:10.1142/3377

    work page doi:10.1142/3377 1997

  35. [35]

    J. Slim, R. Gebel, D. Heberling, F. Hinder, D. H¨ olscher, A. Lehrach, B. Lorentz, S. Mey, A. Nass, F. Rathmann, L. Reifferscheidt, H. Soltner, H. Straatmann, F. Trinkel, and J. Wolters. Electromagnetic simulation and design of a novel waveguide rf wien filter for electric dipole moment measurements of protons and deuterons.Nuclear Instruments and Methods...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2016.05.012 2016

  36. [36]

    Guidoboni et al

    G. Guidoboni et al. How to reach a thousand-second in-plane polarization lifetime with 0.97-GeV/cdeuterons in a storage ring.Phys. Rev. Lett., 117:054801, 2016.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.117.054801

    2016

  37. [37]

    E. L. Hahn. Spin echoes.Phys. Rev., 80:580–594, Nov 1950. URL:https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.80.580,doi:10.1103/PhysRev.80.580

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.80.580 1950

  38. [38]

    Proton polarimetry at RHIC

    Alessandro Bravar. Proton polarimetry at RHIC. InAIP Conference Proceedings, volume 792, pages 1039–1042, 2005.doi:10.1063/1.2122177

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2122177 2005

  39. [39]

    H. Y. Carr and E. M. Purcell. Effects of diffusion on free precession in nuclear magnetic resonance experiments.Phys. Rev., 94:630–638, May 1954. URL:https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRev.94.630,doi:10.1103/PhysRev.94.630

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.94.630 1954

  40. [40]

    Meiboom and D

    S. Meiboom and D. Gill. Modified spin-echo method for measuring nuclear relaxation times.Review of Scientific Instruments, 29(8):688–691, 08 1958.arXiv:https://pubs. aip.org/aip/rsi/article-pdf/29/8/688/19287064/688_1_online.pdf,doi:10.1063/ 1.1716296

    1958

  41. [41]

    Drung, C

    D. Drung, C. Abmann, J. Beyer, A. Kirste, M. Peters, F. Ruede, and Th. Schurig. Highly sensitive and easy-to-use squid sensors.IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, 17(2):699–704, 2007.doi:10.1109/TASC.2007.897403

    work page doi:10.1109/tasc.2007.897403 2007

  42. [42]

    Xu et al

    D. Xu et al. EIC beam dynamics challenges. Technical Report Fermilab- Conf-22-682-AD, Fermilab, 2022. URL:https://lss.fnal.gov/archive/2022/conf/ fermilab-conf-22-682-ad.pdf

    2022

  43. [43]

    R. L. Fagaly. Superconducting quantum interference device instruments and applications. Rev. Sci. Instrum., 77:101101, 2006.doi:10.1063/1.2354545

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2354545 2006

  44. [44]

    W. B. Schmidke. RHIC polarization for Runs 9–17. Technical Report BNL-209057-2018- TECH, C-A/AP/609, Brookhaven National Laboratory, September 2018. URL:https: //www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1473643

    arXiv 2018

  45. [45]

    A. A. Poblaguev, A. Zelenski, E. Aschenauer, G. Atoian, K. O. Eyser, H. Huang, Y. Makdisi, W. B. Schmidke, I. Alekseev, D. Svirida, and N. H. Buttimore. Preci- sion small scattering angle measurements of elastic proton-proton single and double spin analyzing powers at the rhic hydrogen jet polarimeter.Phys. Rev. Lett., 123:162001, Oct 2019. URL:https://li...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.162001 2019

  46. [46]

    Nikolaev, F

    N.N. Nikolaev, F. Rathmann, A.J. Silenko, and Yu.N. Uzikov. New approach to search for parity-even and parity-odd time-reversal violation beyond the standard model in a stor- age ring.Physics Letters B, 811:135983, 2020. URL:https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0370269320307863,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135983

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135983 2020

  47. [47]

    First Experimental Limit on the Permanent Electric Dipole Moment of the Deuteron

    A. Andres, V. Hejny, A. Nass, N. N. Nikolaev, J. Pretz, F. Rathmann, V. Shmakova, J. Slim, et al. First experimental limit on the permanent electric dipole moment of the deuteron. Phys. Rev. Lett., 136(24):241801, 2026.arXiv:2602.20828,doi:10.1103/ns3s-ld4k

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/ns3s-ld4k 2026

  48. [48]

    Science Requirements and Detector Concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report

    R. Abdul Khalek, A. Accardi, J. Adam, et al. Science requirements and detector concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report.Nucl. Phys. A, 1026:122447, 2022. arXiv:2103.05419,doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2022.122447

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2022.122447 2022

  49. [49]

    A. A. Sokolov and I. M. Ternov. On polarization and spin effects in the theory of synchrotron radiation.Sov. Phys. Dokl., 8:1203, 1964. 61

    1964

  50. [50]

    M. Bai, T. Roser, C. Dawson, J. Kewisch, Y. Makdisi, P. Oddo, C. Pai, and P. Pile. Rhic spin flipper commissioning results. InProceedings of IPAC2012, pages 1302–1304, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 2012.https://proceedings.jacow.org/IPAC2012/papers/tuppc057. pdf. URL:https://proceedings.jacow.org/IPAC2012/papers/tuppc057.pdf

    2012

  51. [51]

    Huang, J

    H. Huang, J. Kewisch, C. Liu, A. Marusic, W. Meng, F. M´ eot, P. Oddo, V. Ptitsyn, V. Ranjbar, and T. Roser. High spin-flip efficiency at 255 GeV for polarized protons in a ring with two full Siberian snakes.Phys. Rev. Lett., 120:264804, 2018.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.120.264804. A Spin manipulation with an RF Wien filter The longitudinal kicker introduced...

    2018

  52. [52]

    Integrated multi-electrode structure: A dedicated RF structure can be designed to generate bothB x(t) andB z(t) within a single device, for example using an extended multi-electrode geometry with independently driven field components

  53. [53]

    A.4 Pulsed-mode RF Wien filter In the pulsed mode, the RF Wien filter is operated using short, phase-synchronized excitations rather than a continuous wave

    Pulsed RF Wien filter. A.4 Pulsed-mode RF Wien filter In the pulsed mode, the RF Wien filter is operated using short, phase-synchronized excitations rather than a continuous wave. In continuous operation, as discussed in Sec. A.1, a linearly oscillating fieldB x(t)∝cos(ωt) contains two counter-rotating componentse +iωt ande −iωt. At νs = 1 2, both compone...