arxiv: 2103.05419 · v3 · submitted 2021-03-08 · ⚛️ physics.ins-det · hep-ex· hep-ph· nucl-ex· nucl-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Science Requirements and Detector Concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report

R. Abdul Khalek , A. Accardi , J. Adam , D. Adamiak , W. Akers , M. Albaladejo , A. Al-bataineh , M. G. Alexeev

show 406 more authors

F. Ameli P. Antonioli N. Armesto W. R. Armstrong M. Arratia J. Arrington A. Asaturyan M. Asai E. C. Aschenauer S. Aune H. Avagyan C. Ayerbe Gayoso B. Azmoun A. Bacchetta M. D. Baker F. Barbosa L. Barion K. N. Barish P. C. Barry M. Battaglieri A. Bazilevsky N.K. Behera F. Benmokhtar V.V. Berdnikov J.C. Bernauer V. Bertone S. Bhattacharya C. Bissolotti D. Boer M. Boglione M. Bond\`i P. Boora I. Borsa F. Boss\`u G. Bozzi J. D. Brandenburg N. Brei A. Bressan W. K. Brooks S. Bufalino M. H. S. Bukhari V. Burkert N. H. Buttimore A. Camsonne A. Celentano F. G. Celiberto W. Chang C. Chatterjee K. Chen T. Chetry T. Chiarusi Y.-T. Chien M. Chiosso X. Chu E. Chudakov G. Cicala E. Cisbani I. C. Cloet C. Cocuzza P. L. Cole D. Colella J. L. Collins II M. Constantinou M. Contalbrigo G. Contin R. Corliss W. Cosyn A. Courtoy J. Crafts R. Cruz-Torres R. C. Cuevas U. D'Alesio S. Dalla Torre D. Das S. S. Dasgupta C. Da Silva W. Deconinck M. Defurne W. Degraw K. Dehmelt A. Del Dotto F. Delcarro A. Deshpande W. Detmold R. De Vita M. Diefenthaler C. Dilks D. U. Dixit S. Dulat A. Dumitru R. Dupr\'e J. M. Durham M. G. Echevarria L. El Fassi D. Elia R. Ent R. Esha J. J. Ethier O. Evdokimov K. O. Eyser C. Fanelli R. Fatemi S. Fazio C. Fernandez-Ramirez M. Finger M. Finger Jr. D. Fitzgerald C. Flore T. Frederico I. Fri\v{s}\v{c}i\'c S. Fucini S. Furletov Y. Furletova C. Gal L. Gamberg H. Gao P. Garg D. Gaskell K. Gates M. B. Gay Ducati M. Gericke G. Gil da Silveira F.-X. Girod D. I. Glazier K. Gnanvo V. P. Goncalves L. Gonella J. O. Gonzalez Hernandez Y. Goto F. Grancagnolo L. C. Greiner W. Guryn V. Guzey Y. Hatta M. Hattawy F. Hauenstein X. He T. K. Hemmick O. Hen G. Heyes D. W. Higinbotham A. N. Hiller Blin T. J. Hobbs M. Hohlmann T. Horn T.-J. Hou J. Huang Q. Huang G. M. Huber C. E. Hyde G. Iakovidis Y. Ilieva B. V. Jacak P. M. Jacobs M. Jadhav Z. Janoska A. Jentsch T. Jezo X. Jing P. G. Jones K. Joo S. Joosten V. Kafka N. Kalantarians G. Kalicy D. Kang Z. B. Kang K. Kauder S. J. D. Kay C. E. Keppel J. Kim A. Kiselev M. Klasen S. Klein H. T. Klest O. Korchak A. Kostina P. Kotko Y. V. Kovchegov M. Krelina S. Kuleshov S. Kumano K. S. Kumar R. Kumar L. Kumar K. Kumeri\v{c}ki A. Kusina K. Kutak Y. S. Lai K. Lalwani T. Lappi J. Lauret M. Lavinsky D. Lawrence D. Lednicky C. Lee K. Lee S. H. Lee S. Levorato H. Li S. Li W. Li X. Li W. B. Li T. Ligonzo H. Liu M. X. Liu X. Liu S. Liuti N. Liyanage C. Lorc\'e Z. Lu G. Lucero N. S. Lukow E. Lunghi R. Majka Y. Makris I. Mandjavidze S. Mantry H. M\"antysaari F. Marhauser P. Markowitz L. Marsicano A. Mastroserio V. Mathieu Y. Mehtar-Tani W. Melnitchouk L. Mendez A. Metz Z.-E. Meziani C. Mezrag M. Mihovilovi\v{c} R. Milner M. Mirazita H. Mkrtchyan A. Mkrtchyan V. Mochalov V. Moiseev M. M. Mondal A. Morreale D. Morrison L. Motyka H. Moutarde C. Mu\~noz Camacho F. Murgia M. J. Murray P. Musico P. Nadel-Turonski P. M. Nadolsky J. Nam P. R. Newman D. Neyret D. Nguyen E. R. Nocera F. Noferini F. Noto A. S. Nunes V. A. Okorokov F. Olness J. D. Osborn B. S. Page S. Park A. Parker K. Paschke B. Pasquini H. Paukkunen S. Paul C. Pecar I. L. Pegg C. Pellegrino C. Peng L. Pentchev R. Perrino F. Petriello R. Petti A. Pilloni C. Pinkenburg B. Pire C. Pisano D. Pitonyak A. A. Poblaguev T. Polakovic M. Posik M. Potekhin R. Preghenella S. Preins A. Prokudin P. Pujahari M. L. Purschke J. R. Pybus M. Radici R. Rajput-Ghoshal P.E. Reimer M. Rinaldi F. Ringer C. D. Roberts S. Rodini J. Rojo D. Romanov P. Rossi E. Santopinto M. Sarsour R. Sassot N. Sato B. Schenke W. B. Schmidke I. Schmidt A. Schmidt B. Schmookler G. Schnell P. Schweitzer J. Schwiening I. Scimemi S. Scopetta J. Segovia R. Seidl S. Sekula K. Semenov-Tian-Shanskiy D. Y. Shao N. Sherrill E. Sichtermann M. Siddikov A. Signori B. K. Singh S. \v{S}irca K. Slifer W. Slominski D. Sokhan W. E. Sondheim Y. Song O. Soto H. Spiesberger A. M. Stasto P. Stepanov G. Sterman J. R. Stevens I. W. Stewart I. Strakovsky M. Strikman M. Sturm M. L. Stutzman M. Sullivan B. Surrow P. Svihra S. Syritsyn A. Szczepaniak P. Sznajder H. Szumila-Vance L. Szymanowski A. S. Tadepalli J. D. Tapia Takaki G. F. Tassielli J. Terry F. Tessarotto K. Tezgin L. Tomasek F. Torales Acosta P. Tribedy A. Tricoli Triloki S. Tripathi R. L. Trotta O. D. Tsai Z. Tu C. Tuv\`e T. Ullrich M. Ungaro G. M. Urciuoli A. Valentini P. Vancura M. Vandenbroucke C. Van Hulse G. Varner R. Venugopalan I. Vitev A. Vladimirov G. Volpe A. Vossen E. Voutier J. Wagner S. Wallon H. Wang Q. Wang X. Wang S. Y. Wei C. Weiss T. Wenaus H. Wennl\"of N. Wickramaarachchi A. Wikramanayake D. Winney C. P. Wong C. Woody L. Xia B. W. Xiao J. Xie H. Xing Q. H. Xu J. Zhang S. Zhang Z. Zhang Z. W. Zhao Y. X. Zhao L. Zheng Y. Zhou P. Zurita

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 18:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.ins-det hep-exhep-phnucl-exnucl-th

keywords Electron-Ion ColliderEICgluon structuredetector conceptsphysics requirementspolarized beamsnucleon spinparticle identification

0 comments

The pith

The Electron-Ion Collider will map gluon-dominated nucleon and nuclear structure plus spin and spatial distributions via high-luminosity polarized electron-ion collisions, which set strict detector requirements.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The report lays out the physics program for the Electron-Ion Collider, showing how polarized electron beams colliding with proton and ion beams can reach the gluon-dominated interior of nucleons and nuclei. It translates a wide set of proposed measurements into concrete demands on detector acceptance, momentum resolution, and particle identification. A reader would care because these measurements address the basic composition of visible matter in ways that current facilities cannot match. The document also presents evolving detector concepts, including the value of two complementary interaction regions, to turn the physics goals into feasible experiments.

Core claim

High-luminosity polarized electron-ion collisions at the EIC will give direct access to the gluon-dominated structure of nucleons and nuclei along with their spin and spatial distributions, which imposes precise requirements on detector acceptance, resolution, and particle identification that must be met by general-purpose detector systems in two interaction regions.

What carries the argument

Detector acceptance, resolution, and particle-identification capabilities tuned to high-luminosity polarized collisions in complementary interaction regions.

If this is right

Detailed maps of gluon distributions inside protons and nuclei will become available.
Spin and orbital angular momentum contributions within the proton will be measured with high precision.
Three-dimensional imaging of nucleon structure will advance through measurements of spatial distributions.
Nuclear modifications to parton distributions will be studied directly in ion collisions.
Complementary detectors will enable cross-checks that reduce overall systematic uncertainties.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Data from the EIC could help close long-standing gaps in the proton spin puzzle by separating gluon and quark contributions.
The detector requirements may set benchmarks for future high-energy lepton-hadron facilities.
Two-interaction-region designs could allow simultaneous running of different physics programs with reduced interference.
Successful background rejection would open the door to rare-process searches that test extensions of the standard model.

Load-bearing premise

The proposed interaction regions and detector technologies can reach the required luminosity, background rejection, and systematic control in the high-radiation environment.

What would settle it

A full-scale detector prototype or simulation that cannot simultaneously deliver the target luminosity and the required tracking or particle-identification performance under expected background levels.

read the original abstract

This report describes the physics case, the resulting detector requirements, and the evolving detector concepts for the experimental program at the Electron-Ion Collider (EIC). The EIC will be a powerful new high-luminosity facility in the United States with the capability to collide high-energy electron beams with high-energy proton and ion beams, providing access to those regions in the nucleon and nuclei where their structure is dominated by gluons. Moreover, polarized beams in the EIC will give unprecedented access to the spatial and spin structure of the proton, neutron, and light ions. The studies leading to this document were commissioned and organized by the EIC User Group with the objective of advancing the state and detail of the physics program and developing detector concepts that meet the emerging requirements in preparation for the realization of the EIC. The effort aims to provide the basis for further development of concepts for experimental equipment best suited for the science needs, including the importance of two complementary detectors and interaction regions. This report consists of three volumes. Volume I is an executive summary of our findings and developed concepts. In Volume II we describe studies of a wide range of physics measurements and the emerging requirements on detector acceptance and performance. Volume III discusses general-purpose detector concepts and the underlying technologies to meet the physics requirements. These considerations will form the basis for a world-class experimental program that aims to increase our understanding of the fundamental structure of all visible matter

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This is a solid community synthesis of EIC physics goals and detector needs that organizes prior work without new results.

read the letter

The EIC Yellow Report is mainly a well-organized summary of what the planned Electron-Ion Collider needs to achieve in physics and how detectors should be built to get there. It does not present new measurements or derivations but instead collects and prioritizes existing ideas from the community into clear volumes on the science case, requirements, and concepts. Your colleague should know upfront that this is planning documentation rather than a research advance. What it does well is spell out the specific measurements in detail, from gluon-dominated structure in nucleons and nuclei to spin and spatial distributions with polarized beams, and tie them directly to detector targets for acceptance, resolution, and particle identification. The concepts draw from documented simulations and prototypes, and the report makes a reasonable case for two complementary detectors and interaction regions to cover the program. The physics requirements rest on standard QCD calculations and data from existing facilities, which keeps the logic straightforward. The softer spots are the performance projections, which still depend on reaching the stated luminosity and background levels in a real high-radiation setup. The report flags engineering validation as future work, and that is fair, but readers should view the specs as targets rather than proven outcomes. No load-bearing internal contradictions appear in the structure. This is for nuclear and particle physicists involved in EIC planning or QCD phenomenology. It deserves serious refereeing because it will be a standard reference for the project and points to where further R&D is needed.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents the physics case for the Electron-Ion Collider, derives detector acceptance, resolution, and particle-identification requirements from key measurements of gluon-dominated nucleon and nuclear structure plus spin and spatial distributions, and outlines conceptual designs for two complementary general-purpose detectors based on established technologies and performance projections.

Significance. If realized, the EIC program will deliver unprecedented access to gluon-dominated regimes and polarized structure functions; the report's value lies in its systematic compilation of requirements from external QCD benchmarks and accelerator parameters, together with documented simulation and prototype projections that support the proposed measurements without internal circularity.

minor comments (2)

[Volume I] Volume I executive summary: the statement that two complementary detectors are important would benefit from a one-sentence cross-reference to the specific acceptance or background-rejection arguments developed in Volume II.
[Volume III] Volume III technology section: several performance tables cite simulation results without quoting the underlying Monte Carlo version or key parameter settings, which would aid reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and for recommending acceptance. The report compiles the physics requirements and detector concepts for the EIC program in a systematic manner, and we appreciate the recognition of its value in supporting the experimental program.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The report compiles physics requirements and detector concepts from established theory, prior R&D, and external accelerator benchmarks. The central claims regarding gluon-dominated structure access and spin/spatial distributions follow directly from stated luminosity, polarization, and acceptance targets without any load-bearing step reducing by the paper's own equations or self-citations to internally fitted quantities. No self-definitional loops, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or uniqueness theorems imported from the same authors appear in the derivation chain. The document is self-contained against external benchmarks and functions as a requirements synthesis rather than a closed theoretical derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The report rests on standard QCD and QED assumptions plus accelerator performance goals that are treated as inputs from the EIC design studies; no new particles or forces are postulated.

free parameters (2)

target luminosity
Set at 10^33-10^34 cm^-2 s^-1 to reach required statistical precision on rare processes; chosen rather than derived from first principles.
beam energy range
10-140 GeV center-of-mass energy selected to cover the gluon-dominated kinematic region.

axioms (2)

standard math Standard Model interactions govern electron-nucleon scattering
Invoked throughout Volume II for cross-section calculations.
domain assumption Detector response can be simulated with current Monte Carlo tools to the required accuracy
Underlying all performance projections in Volume III.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 7904 in / 1410 out tokens · 35361 ms · 2026-05-14T18:57:00.807695+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.DAlembert.Inevitability bilinear_family_forced unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

This report describes the physics case, the resulting detector requirements, and the evolving detector concepts for the experimental program at the Electron-Ion Collider (EIC).
IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.PhiForcing phi_equation unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

The EIC will provide unprecedented access to the gluon-dominated structure of nucleons and nuclei and to their spin and spatial distributions through high-luminosity polarized electron-ion collisions.

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 21 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Reconstructing the full kinematic dependence of GPDs from pseudo-distributions
hep-lat 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

Lattice QCD pseudo-distributions at m_π=358 MeV are inverted via multidimensional Gaussian process regression to reconstruct the full kinematic dependence of GPDs H^{u-d} and E^{u-d} while directly extracting double d...
Collinear matching for leading power gluon transverse momentum distributions
hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

Tree-level and one-loop collinear matching relations are computed for leading-power gluon TMD PDFs, yielding the first Wandzura-Wilczek approximation for the gluon worm-gear T distribution along with a closed-form mas...
Exclusive photoproduction of a di-meson pair with large invariant mass
hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

Calculations of di-meson photoproduction amplitudes at leading order show cross sections up to 100 times larger than single-meson cases, enabling better GPD extraction.
Simplified approach to extracting nucleon transversity in collinear factorization using near-side energy-energy correlators
hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

A new method extracts the nucleon transversity PDF via near-side energy-energy correlators in dihadron fragmentation under collinear factorization, with leading-order results for SIDIS and e+e- annihilation that resem...
Simplified approach to extracting nucleon transversity in collinear factorization using near-side energy-energy correlators
hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

A new approach using near-side energy-energy correlators in dihadron fragmentation enables extraction of nucleon transversity PDF in collinear factorization without modeling intrinsic transverse momentum or dihadron r...
Confronting Color Glass Condensate at next-to-leading order with HERA data
hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

A Bayesian global fit at full NLO+NLL accuracy extracts the posterior distribution for the non-perturbative initial condition of the NLO Balitsky-Kovchegov equation from HERA inclusive and charm data.
Isospin Decomposition of Vector and Axial Two-Body Currents via Polarized Electron--Deuteron and Electron--$^3$He Scattering at the Electron-Ion Collider
nucl-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Proposal for EIC measurements to isolate axial two-body currents via subtraction of electromagnetic and charged-current scattering on polarized light nuclei.
AI-assisted modeling and Bayesian inference of unpolarized quark transverse momentum distributions from Drell-Yan data
hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

An AI-assisted Bayesian framework extracts TMD PDFs from global Drell-Yan data using surrogate models for scalable MCMC sampling.
On Exclusive Coherent Production of Bosons in Electron-Proton Collisions
hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

A phenomenological 2-to-3 framework is constructed for exclusive boson electroproduction that matches flux-factorized predictions near Q^{2}=0 while capturing finite-Q^{2} effects at larger virtualities.
Transverse energy-momentum tensor distributions in polarized nucleons
hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

The quantum phase-space formalism derives transverse energy-momentum tensor distributions in polarized nucleons and reproduces standard light-front distributions including bad components in the infinite-momentum frame.
Gravitational transverse momentum distribution of proton
hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Analytical expressions for quark gravitational TMDs are derived in the LFQDM, verified against standard TMD relations, and linked to transverse pressure and shear-force distributions.
Probing Saturation Effect in Heavy Meson Pair Correlation in Forward $pA$ Collisions
hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Heavy meson pair correlations in forward pA collisions are computed in the CGC framework with Sudakov resummation, reproducing LHCb data and showing a mass hierarchy in R_pA that strengthens at higher rapidity.
Coherent deeply virtual Compton scattering on helium-4 beyond leading power
hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Higher-twist and NLO corrections to DVCS on He-4 enable the first 3D parton-level tomography of the helium-4 nucleus.
On the Two $R$-Factors in the Small-$x$ Shockwave Formalism
hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Replacing the rapidity argument of the dipole amplitude with ln min{1/|x|, 1/|ξ|} and refining initial conditions for non-linear evolution can eliminate two R-factors in small-x shockwave calculations.
All-charm tetraquarks at hadron colliders: A high-precision fragmentation perspective
hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

The authors construct and publicly release the TQ4Q2.0 fragmentation functions for all-heavy S-wave tetraquarks via NRQCD factorization, extending prior work with nonconstituent contributions and replica-based uncertainties.
Stability of parton distributions at high $x$: impact of nuclear and power corrections
hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

Global fit finds u and d PDFs stable to x≈0.8 with positive isospin-independent higher-twist corrections and nonzero off-shell nucleon contributions required to describe nuclear data.
Nuclear structure and saturation effects from diffractive vector meson production
hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

Predictions for vector meson production in light-nucleus UPCs show t-differential observables sensitive to nuclear structure models and saturation suppression that grows with nuclear mass and collision energy.
On the Cancellation of Nuclear Effects in the Valence Region
nucl-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

World data on isoscalar DIS cross-section ratios exhibit near-perfect cancellation of nuclear effects in the valence region 0.25 ≤ x ≤ 0.35 across nuclei.
Multimodal Fragmentation of All-Heavy Pentaquarks: Uncertainty-Aware Predictions for Hadron Colliders
hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

Develops uncertainty-aware fragmentation functions PQ5Q1.1 for all-charm pentaquarks using multimodal perturbative and nonperturbative modeling for collider predictions.
Hadron Structure from lattice QCD in the context of the Electron-Ion Collider
hep-lat 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 2.0

Lattice QCD now delivers high-precision results on hadron internal structure that directly support the scientific program of the Electron-Ion Collider.
Introduction to transverse momentum imaging
hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted

The notes provide an introduction to transverse momentum dependent distributions and their use in imaging hadrons, complementing lectures at several graduate schools.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

286 extracted references · 286 canonical work pages · cited by 20 Pith papers · 170 internal anchors

[1]

doi:10.17226/25171

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, An Assessment of U.S.-Based Electron-Ion Collider Science, The National Academies Press, Washing- ton, DC, 2018. doi:10.17226/25171

work page doi:10.17226/25171 2018
[2]

Electron Ion Collider: The Next QCD Frontier - Understanding the glue that binds us all

A. Accardi, et al., Electron Ion Collider: The Next QCD Frontier: Understanding the glue that binds us all, Eur. Phys. J. A 52 (2016) 268. arXiv:1212.1701, doi: 10.1140/epja/i2016-16268-9

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epja/i2016-16268-9 2016
[3]

Aprahamian, et al., Reaching for the horizon: The 2015 long range plan for nu- clear science, DOE/NSF Nuclear Science Advisory Panel Report (2015)

A. Aprahamian, et al., Reaching for the horizon: The 2015 long range plan for nu- clear science, DOE/NSF Nuclear Science Advisory Panel Report (2015). URL http://www.osti.gov/biblio/1296778

work page arXiv 2015
[4]

R. L. Jaffe, A. Manohar, The G(1) problem: fact and fantasy on the spin of the proton, Nucl. Phys. B 337 (1990) 509–546. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90506-9

work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90506-9 1990
[5]

The RHIC SPIN Program: Achievements and Future Opportunities

E.-C. Aschenauer, et al., The RHIC SPIN Program: Achievements and Future Op- portunities (2015). arXiv:1501.01220

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[6]

E. C. Aschenauer, R. Sassot, M. Stratmann, Unveiling the proton spin decompo- sition at a future Electron-Ion Collider, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 094030. arXiv: 1509.06489, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.094030

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.094030 2015
[7]

E. C. Aschenauer, S. Fazio, J. H. Lee, H. Mantysaari, B. S. Page, B. Schenke, T. Ull- rich, R. Venugopalan, P . Zurita, The Electron-Ion Collider: Assessing the energy dependence of key measurements, Rept. Prog. Phys. 82 (2019) 024301. arXiv: 1708.01527, doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aaf216

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aaf216 2019
[8]

A QCD Analysis of the Mass Structure of the Nucleon

X.-D. Ji, A QCD analysis of the mass structure of the nucleon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995) 1071–1074. arXiv:hep-ph/9410274, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.1071

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74.1071 1995
[9]

On the hadron mass decomposition

C. Lorc ´e, On the hadron mass decomposition, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2) (2018) 120. arXiv:1706.05853, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5561-2

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5561-2 2018
[10]

Quark and gluon contributions to the QCD trace anomaly

Y. Hatta, A. Rajan, K. Tanaka, Quark and gluon contributions to the QCD trace anomaly, JHEP 12 (2018) 008. arXiv:1810.05116, doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2018)008

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep12(2018)008 2018
[12]

A. C. Aguilar, et al., Pion and Kaon Structure at the Electron-Ion Collider, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (10) (2019) 190. arXiv:1907.08218, doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12885-0

work page doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12885-0 2019
[13]

D. Boer, P . J. Mulders, Time reversal odd distribution functions in leptoproduc- tion, Phys. Rev. D57 (1998) 5780–5786. arXiv:hep-ph/9711485, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.57.5780

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[14]

D. W. Sivers, Single Spin Production Asymmetries from the Hard Scattering of Point-Like Constituents, Phys. Rev. D 41 (1990) 83. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.41.83

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.41.83 1990
[15]

D. W. Sivers, Hard scattering scaling laws for single spin production asymmetries, Phys. Rev. D43 (1991) 261–263. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.43.261

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.43.261 1991
[16]

Accessing the Gluon Sivers Function at a future Electron-Ion Collider

L. Zheng, E. C. Aschenauer, J. H. Lee, B.-W. Xiao, Z.-B. Yin, Accessing the gluon Sivers function at a future electron-ion collider, Phys. Rev. D 98 (3) (2018) 034011. arXiv:1805.05290, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.034011

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.034011 2018
[17]

Wave Functions, Evolution Equations and Evolution Kernels from Light-Ray Operators of QCD

D. M ¨uller, D. Robaschik, B. Geyer, F. M. Dittes, J. Hoˇrejˇsi, Wave functions, evolution equations and evolution kernels from light ray operators of QCD, Fortsch. Phys. 42 (1994) 101–141. arXiv:hep-ph/9812448, doi:10.1002/prop.2190420202

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1002/prop.2190420202 1994
[18]

A. V . Radyushkin, Scaling limit of deeply virtual Compton scattering, Phys. Lett. B380 (1996) 417–425. arXiv:hep-ph/9604317, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(96) 00528-X

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0370-2693(96 1996
[19]

Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering

X.-D. Ji, Deeply virtual Compton scattering, Phys. Rev. D55 (1997) 7114–7125. arXiv:hep-ph/9609381, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.55.7114

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.55.7114 1997
[20]

Impact Parameter Space Interpretation for Generalized Parton Distributions

M. Burkardt, Impact parameter space interpretation for generalized parton dis- tributions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A18 (2003) 173–208. arXiv:hep-ph/0207047, doi: 10.1142/S0217751X03012370

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0217751x03012370 2003
[21]

Gauge-Invariant Decomposition of Nucleon Spin and Its Spin-Off

X.-D. Ji, Gauge invariant decomposition of nucleon spin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 610–613. arXiv:hep-ph/9603249, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.610

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.610 1997
[22]

Generalized parton distributions and strong forces inside nucleons and nuclei

M. Polyakov, Generalized parton distributions and strong forces inside nucleons and nuclei, Phys. Lett. B 555 (2003) 57–62. arXiv:hep-ph/0210165, doi:10.1016/ S0370-2693(03)00036-4

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
[23]

Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering at a Proposed High-Luminosity Electron-Ion Collider

E.-C. Aschenauer, S. Fazio, K. Kumericki, D. Mueller, Deeply Virtual Compton Scat- tering at a Proposed High-Luminosity Electron-Ion Collider, JHEP 09 (2013) 093. arXiv:1304.0077, doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2013)093

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep09(2013)093 2013
[24]

The Color Glass Condensate

F. Gelis, E. Iancu, J. Jalilian-Marian, R. Venugopalan, The Color Glass Conden- sate, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 60 (2010) 463–489. arXiv:1002.0333, doi:10.1146/ annurev.nucl.010909.083629

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[25]

K. J. Eskola, P . Paakkinen, H. Paukkunen, C. A. Salgado, EPPS16: Nuclear parton distributions with LHC data, Eur. Phys. J. C77 (2017) 163. arXiv:1612.05741, doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4725-9 . REFERENCES 745

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4725-9 2017
[26]

E. C. Aschenauer, S. Fazio, M. A. C. Lamont, H. Paukkunen, P . Zurita, Nuclear Structure Functions at a Future Electron-Ion Collider, Phys. Rev. D96 (11) (2017) 114005. arXiv:1708.05654, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.114005

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.114005 2017
[27]

Photon structure studied at an Electron Ion Collider

X. Chu, E.-C. Aschenauer, J.-H. Lee, L. Zheng, Photon structure studied at an Electron Ion Collider, Phys. Rev. D 96 (7) (2017) 074035. arXiv:1705.08831, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.074035

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.074035 2017
[28]

Arratia, Y

M. Arratia, Y. Song, F. Ringer, B. Jacak, Jets as precision probes in electron-nucleus collisions at the Electron-Ion Collider, Phys. Rev. C 101 (6) (2020) 065204. arXiv: 1912.05931, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.101.065204

work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.101.065204 2020
[29]

X. Liu, F. Ringer, W. Vogelsang, F. Yuan, Lepton-jet Correlations in Deep Inelas- tic Scattering at the Electron-Ion Collider, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (19) (2019) 192003. arXiv:1812.08077, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.192003

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.192003 2019
[30]

The Theory of Deeply Inelastic Scattering

J. Blumlein, The Theory of Deeply Inelastic Scattering, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 69 (2013) 28–84. arXiv:1208.6087, doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2012.09.006

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2012.09.006 2013
[31]

Ashman, et al., A Measurement of the Spin Asymmetry and Determination of the Structure Function g(1) in Deep Inelastic Muon-Proton Scattering, Phys

J. Ashman, et al., A Measurement of the Spin Asymmetry and Determination of the Structure Function g(1) in Deep Inelastic Muon-Proton Scattering, Phys. Lett. B 206 (1988) 364. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(88)91523-7

work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(88)91523-7 1988
[32]

C. A. Aidala, S. D. Bass, D. Hasch, G. K. Mallot, The Spin Structure of the Nucleon, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85 (2013) 655–691. arXiv:1209.2803, doi:10.1103/RevModPhys. 85.655

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/revmodphys 2013
[33]

Lorc ´e, Charge Distributions of Moving Nucleons, Phys

C. Lorc ´e, Charge Distributions of Moving Nucleons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (23) (2020) 232002. arXiv:2007.05318, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.232002

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.232002 2020
[34]

G. A. Miller, Charge Density of the Neutron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 112001. arXiv:0705.2409, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.112001

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.112001 2007
[36]

P . J. Mulders, R. D. Tangerman, The Complete tree level result up to order 1/Q for polarized deep inelastic leptoproduction, Nucl. Phys. B 461 (1996) 197–237, [Er- ratum: Nucl.Phys.B 484, 538–540 (1997)]. arXiv:hep-ph/9510301, doi:10.1016/ 0550-3213(95)00632-X

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996
[37]

P . J. Mulders, J. Rodrigues, Transverse momentum dependence in gluon distribu- tion and fragmentation functions, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 094021. arXiv:hep-ph/ 0009343, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.63.094021

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.63.094021 2001
[38]

Relations between generalized and transverse momentum dependent parton distributions

S. Meissner, A. Metz, K. Goeke, Relations between generalized and transverse mo- mentum dependent parton distributions, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 034002. arXiv: hep-ph/0703176, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.034002. 746 EIC Yellow Report

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.76.034002 2007
[39]

J. C. Collins, Fragmentation of transversely polarized quarks probed in trans- verse momentum distributions, Nucl. Phys. B 396 (1993) 161–182. arXiv:hep-ph/ 9208213, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(93)90262-N

work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(93)90262-n 1993
[40]

Nuclear enhancement of universal dynamics of high parton densities

H. Kowalski, T. Lappi, R. Venugopalan, Nuclear enhancement of universal dynam- ics of high parton densities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 022303. arXiv:0705.3047, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.022303

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.022303 2008
[41]

An Impact Parameter Dipole Saturation Model

H. Kowalski, D. Teaney, An Impact parameter dipole saturation model, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 114005. arXiv:hep-ph/0304189, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.68.114005

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.68.114005 2003
[42]

Exclusive diffractive processes at HERA within the dipole picture

H. Kowalski, L. Motyka, G. Watt, Exclusive diffractive processes at HERA within the dipole picture, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 074016. arXiv:hep-ph/0606272, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.074016

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.074016 2006
[43]

J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper, G. F. Sterman, Factorization of Hard Processes in QCD, Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys. 5 (1989) 1–91. arXiv:hep-ph/0409313, doi: 10.1142/9789814503266_0001

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/9789814503266_0001 1989
[44]

Arneodo, et al., The A dependence of the nuclear structure function ratios, Nucl

M. Arneodo, et al., The A dependence of the nuclear structure function ratios, Nucl. Phys. B 481 (1996) 3–22. doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(96)90117-0

work page doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(96)90117-0 1996
[45]

D. F. Geesaman, K. Saito, A. W. Thomas, The nuclear EMC effect, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 45 (1995) 337–390. doi:10.1146/annurev.ns.45.120195.002005

work page doi:10.1146/annurev.ns.45.120195.002005 1995
[46]

Gomez, et al., Measurement of the A-dependence of deep inelastic electron scat- tering, Phys

J. Gomez, et al., Measurement of the A-dependence of deep inelastic electron scat- tering, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 4348–4372. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.49.4348

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.49.4348 1994
[47]

P . R. Norton, The EMC effect, Rept. Prog. Phys. 66 (2003) 1253–1297.doi:10.1088/ 0034-4885/66/8/201

work page 2003
[48]

Nuclear PDFs in the beginning of the LHC era

H. Paukkunen, Nuclear PDFs in the beginning of the LHC era, Nucl. Phys. A 926 (2014) 24–33. arXiv:1401.2345, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2014.04.001

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2014.04.001 2014
[49]

Energy losses in a hot plasma revisited

S. Peigne, A. V . Smilga, Energy losses in a hot plasma revisited, Phys. Usp. 52 (2009) 659–685. arXiv:0810.5702, doi:10.3367/UFNe.0179.200907a.0697

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3367/ufne.0179.200907a.0697 2009
[50]

Initial-state energy loss in cold QCD matter and the Drell-Yan process

F. Arleo, C.-J. Na ¨ım, S. Platchkov, Initial-state energy loss in cold QCD matter and the Drell-Yan process, JHEP 01 (2019) 129. arXiv:1810.05120, doi:10.1007/ JHEP01(2019)129

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[51]

Eic yellow reports – kick-off meeting, https://www.jlab.org/indico/event/348/ (2019)

work page 2019
[52]

E. D. Bloom, et al., High-Energy Inelastic e p Scattering at 6-Degrees and 10- Degrees, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23 (1969) 930–934. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.930

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.23.930 1969
[53]

Breidenbach, J

M. Breidenbach, J. I. Friedman, H. W. Kendall, E. D. Bloom, D. H. Coward, H. C. DeStaebler, J. Drees, L. W. Mo, R. E. Taylor, Observed behavior of highly inelas- tic electron-proton scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23 (1969) 935–939. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.23.935. REFERENCES 747

work page 1969
[54]

J. Gao, L. Harland-Lang, J. Rojo, The Structure of the Proton in the LHC Precision Era, Phys. Rept. 742 (2018) 1–121. arXiv:1709.04922, doi:10.1016/j.physrep. 2018.03.002

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physrep 2018
[55]

J. J. Ethier, E. R. Nocera, Parton Distributions in Nucleons and Nuclei, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 70 (2020) 43–76. arXiv:2001.07722, doi:10.1146/ annurev-nucl-011720-042725

work page arXiv 2020
[56]

The PDF4LHC report on PDFs and LHC data: Results from Run I and preparation for Run II

J. Rojo, et al., The PDF4LHC report on PDFs and LHC data: Results from Run I and preparation for Run II, J. Phys. G 42 (2015) 103103. arXiv:1507.00556, doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/42/10/103103

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0954-3899/42/10/103103 2015
[57]

R. D. Ball, et al., Parton distributions from high-precision collider data, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (10) (2017) 663. arXiv:1706.00428, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5199-5

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5199-5 2017
[58]

APFEL: A PDF Evolution Library with QED corrections

V . Bertone, S. Carrazza, J. Rojo, APFEL: A PDF Evolution Library with QED corrections, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 1647–1668. arXiv:1310.1394, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2014.03.007

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2014.03.007 2014
[60]

N. Sato, C. Andres, J. J. Ethier, W. Melnitchouk, Strange quark suppression from a simultaneous Monte Carlo analysis of parton distributions and fragmentation functions, Phys. Rev. D 101 (7) (2020) 074020. arXiv:1905.03788, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.101.074020

work page arXiv 2020
[61]

B.-T. Wang, T. J. Hobbs, S. Doyle, J. Gao, T.-J. Hou, P . M. Nadolsky, F. I. Olness, Mapping the sensitivity of hadronic experiments to nucleon structure, Phys. Rev. D 98 (9) (2018) 094030. arXiv:1803.02777, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.094030

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.094030 2018
[62]

T. J. Hobbs, B.-T. Wang, P . M. Nadolsky, F. I. Olness, Charting the coming synergy between lattice QCD and high-energy phenomenology, Phys. Rev. D 100 (9) (2019) 094040. arXiv:1904.00022, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.094040

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.094040 2019
[63]

T. J. Hobbs, B.-T. Wang, P . M. Nadolsky, F. I. Olness, Collinear PDFs in the era of HL-LHC, LHeC, and EIC, PoS DIS2019 (2019) 247. arXiv:1907.00988, doi: 10.22323/1.352.0247

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.22323/1.352.0247 2019
[64]

Hou, et al., New CTEQ global analysis of quantum chromodynamics with high-precision data from the LHC, Phys

T.-J. Hou, et al., New CTEQ global analysis of quantum chromodynamics with high-precision data from the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 103 (1) (2021) 014013. arXiv: 1912.10053, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.014013

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.014013 2021
[65]

Constraints on large-$x$ parton distributions from new weak boson production and deep-inelastic scattering data

A. Accardi, L. T. Brady, W. Melnitchouk, J. F. Owens, N. Sato, Constraints on large-x parton distributions from new weak boson production and deep-inelastic scattering data, Phys. Rev. D 93 (11) (2016) 114017. arXiv:1602.03154, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.114017. 748 EIC Yellow Report

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.114017 2016
[66]

Cocuzza, N

C. Cocuzza, N. Sato, J. Ethier, W. Melnitchouk, A. Metz, Parton distributions func- tions from JLab to LHC (2021)

work page 2021
[67]

T. J. Hobbs, J. T. Londergan, D. P . Murdock, A. W. Thomas, Testing Partonic Charge Symmetry at a High-Energy Electron Collider, Phys. Lett. B 698 (2011) 123–127. arXiv:1101.3923, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2011.02.040

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2011.02.040 2011
[68]

Model independent method for determination of the DIS structure of free neutron

M. Sargsian, M. Strikman, Model independent method for determination of the DIS structure of free neutron, Phys. Lett. B 639 (2006) 223–231.arXiv:hep-ph/0511054, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2006.05.091

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2006.05.091 2006
[69]

Electron-deuteron deep-inelastic scattering with spectator nucleon tagging and final-state interactions at intermediate x

M. Strikman, C. Weiss, Electron-deuteron deep-inelastic scattering with spectator nucleon tagging and ﬁnal-state interactions at intermediate x, Phys. Rev. C 97 (3) (2018) 035209. arXiv:1706.02244, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.97.035209

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.97.035209 2018
[70]

Weiss, et al., Physics potential of polarized light ions with EIC@JLab, https: //www.jlab.org/theory/tag/, jefferson Lab FY14/15 LDRD Project (2014)

C. Weiss, et al., Physics potential of polarized light ions with EIC@JLab, https: //www.jlab.org/theory/tag/, jefferson Lab FY14/15 LDRD Project (2014)

work page 2014
[71]

S. I. Alekhin, S. A. Kulagin, R. Petti, Nuclear Effects in the Deuteron and Constraints on the d/u Ratio, Phys. Rev. D 96 (5) (2017) 054005. arXiv:1704.00204, doi:10. 1103/PhysRevD.96.054005

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[72]

A. J. Tropiano, J. J. Ethier, W. Melnitchouk, N. Sato, Deep-inelastic and quasielastic electron scattering from A = 3 nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 99 (3) (2019) 035201. arXiv: 1811.07668, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.99.035201

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.99.035201 2019
[73]

K. A. Grifﬁoen, et al., Measurement of the EMC Effect in the Deuteron, Phys. Rev. C 92 (1) (2015) 015211. arXiv:1506.00871, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.92.015211

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.92.015211 2015
[74]

The Challenge of the EMC Effect: existing data and future directions

S. Malace, D. Gaskell, D. W. Higinbotham, I. Cloet, The Challenge of the EMC Ef- fect: existing data and future directions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 23 (08) (2014) 1430013. arXiv:1405.1270, doi:10.1142/S0218301314300136

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0218301314300136 2014
[75]

E. C. Aschenauer, I. Borsa, R. Sassot, C. Van Hulse, Semi-inclusive Deep-Inelastic Scattering, Parton Distributions and Fragmentation Functions at a Future Electron- Ion Collider, Phys. Rev. D 99 (9) (2019) 094004. arXiv:1902.10663, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.99.094004

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[76]

PYTHIA 6.4 Physics and Manual

T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, P . Z. Skands, PYTHIA 6.4 Physics and Manual, JHEP 05 (2006) 026. arXiv:hep-ph/0603175, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/05/026

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/05/026 2006
[77]

R. D. Ball, V . Bertone, F. Cerutti, L. Del Debbio, S. Forte, A. Guffanti, J. I. La- torre, J. Rojo, M. Ubiali, Reweighting NNPDFs: the W lepton asymmetry, Nucl. Phys. B 849 (2011) 112–143, [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 854, 926–927 (2012), Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 855, 927–928 (2012)]. arXiv:1012.0836, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb. 2011.03.017

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb 2011
[78]

R. D. Ball, V . Bertone, F. Cerutti, L. Del Debbio, S. Forte, A. Guffanti, N. P . Hartland, J. I. Latorre, J. Rojo, M. Ubiali, Reweighting and Unweighting of Parton Distribu- tions and the LHC W lepton asymmetry data, Nucl. Phys. B 855 (2012) 608–638. arXiv:1108.1758, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2011.10.018. REFERENCES 749

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2011.10.018 2012
[79]

R. D. Ball, et al., Parton distributions for the LHC Run II, JHEP 04 (2015) 040.arXiv: 1410.8849, doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2015)040

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep04(2015)040 2015
[80]

S. J. Brodsky, P . Hoyer, C. Peterson, N. Sakai, The Intrinsic Charm of the Proton, Phys. Lett. B 93 (1980) 451–455. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90364-0

work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90364-0 1980
[81]

New limits on intrinsic charm in the nucleon from global analysis of parton distributions

P . Jimenez-Delgado, T. J. Hobbs, J. T. Londergan, W. Melnitchouk, New limits on intrinsic charm in the nucleon from global analysis of parton distributions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (8) (2015) 082002. arXiv:1408.1708, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 114.082002

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett 2015
[82]

T.-J. Hou, S. Dulat, J. Gao, M. Guzzi, J. Huston, P . Nadolsky, C. Schmidt, J. Win- ter, K. Xie, C. P . Yuan, CT14 Intrinsic Charm Parton Distribution Functions from CTEQ-TEA Global Analysis, JHEP 02 (2018) 059.arXiv:1707.00657, doi:10.1007/ JHEP02(2018)059

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[83]

J. J. Aubert, et al., Production of charmed particles in 250-GeVµ+ - iron interactions, Nucl. Phys. B 213 (1983) 31–64. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(83)90174-8

work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(83)90174-8 1983

Showing first 80 references.