pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.01527 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-02 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· hep-th· nucl-th

Recognition: unknown

Probing Saturation Effect in Heavy Meson Pair Correlation in Forward pA Collisions

Zhan Gao , Cyrille Marquet , Yu Shi , Bo-Wen Xiao
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 14:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exhep-thnucl-th
keywords gluon saturationcolor glass condensateheavy meson pairsnuclear modification factorSudakov resummationforward pA collisionsLHCb datamass hierarchy
0
0 comments X

The pith

Heavy-meson pair correlations in forward pA collisions exhibit a mass hierarchy in nuclear suppression from gluon saturation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a framework for heavy meson pair angular correlations in forward proton-nucleus collisions by combining Color Glass Condensate saturation physics with unified Sudakov resummation to account for soft gluon radiation in the back-to-back regime. This approach reproduces the measured Delta phi distributions from LHCb for D0 anti-D0 pairs in both pp and pA collisions as well as J/psi pairs from bottom decays in pp. It then predicts that the nuclear modification factor is smaller for bottom meson pairs than for charm meson pairs, with the difference becoming more pronounced at larger rapidities. The hierarchy indicates that heavier quarks provide greater sensitivity to saturation effects because they access smaller momentum fractions x inside the nucleus.

Core claim

By incorporating a unified Sudakov resummation for heavy meson pair correlations within the Color Glass Condensate framework, the calculation matches LHCb data on azimuthal correlations for D0 Dbar0 pairs in forward pp and pA collisions and for J/psi pairs from b bbar decays in pp collisions. Predictions for D Dbar and B Bbar correlations at LHC forward rapidities reveal a pronounced mass hierarchy in the nuclear modification factor, R_pA for bottom mesons smaller than for charm mesons, which signals stronger saturation sensitivity at small x. The suppression strengthens with increasing rapidity while the mass ordering stays robust.

What carries the argument

Unified Sudakov resummation combined with the Color Glass Condensate effective theory, which simultaneously resums soft-gluon emissions and incorporates gluon saturation to compute back-to-back angular correlations of heavy meson pairs.

Load-bearing premise

The unified Sudakov resummation accurately captures both soft-gluon radiation and saturation effects for heavy meson pairs in the back-to-back regime within the Color Glass Condensate theory.

What would settle it

Precision measurements at higher forward rapidities showing either no mass hierarchy in R_pA or a reversal where bottom meson pairs are less suppressed than charm pairs would contradict the predicted saturation-driven ordering.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.01527 by Bo-Wen Xiao, Cyrille Marquet, Yu Shi, Zhan Gao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic illustration of view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The unpolarized gluon TMDs ( view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Comparison between theoretical predictions and view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Comparison of our theoretical predictions with view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Upper panel: Predictions of the normalized ∆ view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Forward two-particle angular correlations in $pA$ collisions have long been recognized as a particularly sensitive observable for exploring gluon saturation effects. In the back-to-back regime, two-particle correlations receive substantial contributions from both soft-gluon radiation and saturation effects. In this work, we study heavy meson pair correlation in forward proton-nucleus collisions by incorporating a unified Sudakov resummation for heavy meson pair correlations in the Color Glass Condensate effect theory. Our results are in good agreement with the $\Delta\phi$ data measured by the LHCb Collaboration for $D^0 \bar D^0$ pairs in forward $pp$ and $pA$ collisions, as well as $J/\psi$ pairs from $b\bar b$ decays in forward $pp$ collisions. Furthermore, we present predictions for $D\bar D$ and $B\bar B$ correlations in the forward rapidity regions at the Large Hadron Collider. A pronounced mass-hierarchy is observed in the nuclear modification factor, $R_{pA}\big|_{m_b}<R_{pA}\big|_{m_c}$, indicating stronger sensitivity to saturation effects at small $x$. As the rapidity increases, the suppression becomes more pronounced while the mass hierarchy remains robust. This study will help us to search for the saturation signal via heavy-meson pair correlations in forward $pA$ collisions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper studies heavy-meson pair angular correlations in forward pA collisions within the Color Glass Condensate framework by incorporating a unified Sudakov resummation to account for soft-gluon radiation in the back-to-back regime. It reports agreement between the calculated Δϕ distributions and LHCb data for D⁰D̄⁰ pairs in pp and pA collisions as well as for J/ψ pairs from b b̄ decays in pp collisions, and presents predictions for D D̄ and B B̄ correlations at the LHC together with a mass hierarchy in the nuclear modification factor R_pA (R_pA|_{m_b} < R_pA|_{m_c}).

Significance. If the central modeling assumptions hold, the work supplies a concrete, testable signature (mass-dependent suppression in R_pA) that could help isolate saturation effects from other nuclear modifications in forward heavy-flavor correlations at the LHC.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results] Results section (and abstract): the claim of 'good agreement' with LHCb Δϕ data for D⁰D̄⁰ and J/ψ pairs is stated without any quantitative fit metrics (χ², p-values), error bands on the theory curves, or explicit values of the saturation scale Q_s(x) and Sudakov parameters used, preventing assessment of whether the agreement is robust or an artifact of parameter tuning.
  2. [Formalism] Formalism section: the unified Sudakov resummation is presented as simultaneously capturing soft-gluon logs and CGC saturation without double-counting, yet no comparison to standard CSS resummation or fixed-order matching is supplied for the forward back-to-back kinematics of heavy mesons; because the single free parameter Q_s(x) can absorb mismatches, this unification is load-bearing for both the data agreement and the predicted mass hierarchy.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Introduction] Notation for the nuclear modification factor R_pA is introduced without an explicit definition or reference to the standard formula used in the CGC literature.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major point below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results] Results section (and abstract): the claim of 'good agreement' with LHCb Δϕ data for D⁰D̄⁰ and J/ψ pairs is stated without any quantitative fit metrics (χ², p-values), error bands on the theory curves, or explicit values of the saturation scale Q_s(x) and Sudakov parameters used, preventing assessment of whether the agreement is robust or an artifact of parameter tuning.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative metrics would strengthen the presentation. In the revised manuscript we will explicitly state the values of Q_s(x) and the Sudakov parameters employed, and we will add uncertainty bands obtained by varying these parameters within ranges consistent with prior CGC fits. Formal χ² or p-value calculations are not straightforward because the dominant theoretical uncertainties are systematic rather than statistical; we will add a short discussion of this limitation and of how the visual agreement was assessed. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Formalism] Formalism section: the unified Sudakov resummation is presented as simultaneously capturing soft-gluon logs and CGC saturation without double-counting, yet no comparison to standard CSS resummation or fixed-order matching is supplied for the forward back-to-back kinematics of heavy mesons; because the single free parameter Q_s(x) can absorb mismatches, this unification is load-bearing for both the data agreement and the predicted mass hierarchy.

    Authors: The unified resummation is constructed to avoid double-counting by separating the saturation scale from the perturbative Sudakov factor in the forward regime, where standard CSS resummation does not incorporate the x-dependent saturation. We will add a paragraph comparing the back-to-back limit of our expressions to fixed-order pQCD and to the CSS form, showing that the additional saturation terms are essential at the relevant rapidities. The parameter Q_s(x) is taken from independent single-inclusive fits and is not readjusted for the pair data; the mass hierarchy in R_pA arises from the kinematic dependence on the heavy-quark mass in the saturation and Sudakov factors rather than from parameter tuning. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation remains self-contained against external data benchmarks

full rationale

The paper incorporates a unified Sudakov resummation within the CGC framework to compute heavy-meson pair correlations, validates the resulting Δϕ distributions directly against LHCb measurements for D0Dbar0 and J/ψ pairs, and then generates forward predictions plus a mass-hierarchy observation in R_pA. No equation or step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, nor does any central claim rest solely on a self-citation chain whose content is unverified. The data agreement functions as an external check rather than an input that forces the outputs; the mass ordering follows from the model's x- and mass-dependent saturation scales without tautology. The derivation is therefore independent of its own fitted inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Central claim rests on CGC effective theory and unified Sudakov resummation with parameters calibrated to data; no new entities postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • saturation scale Q_s(x)
    Saturation momentum is fitted to data and controls strength of saturation effects in R_pA.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Color Glass Condensate effective theory describes gluon saturation at small x
    Entire framework built on CGC for high-density gluons.
  • domain assumption Unified Sudakov resummation captures soft-gluon and saturation contributions
    Assumed without independent derivation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 9645 in / 1261 out tokens · 52661 ms · 2026-05-09T14:20:46.889012+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

123 extracted references · 117 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    L. V. Gribov, E. M. Levin, and M. G. Ryskin, Phys. Rept.100, 1 (1983)

    1983

  2. [2]

    A. H. Mueller and J.-w. Qiu, Nucl. Phys. B268, 427 (1986)

    1986

  3. [3]

    A. H. Mueller, Nucl. Phys. B335, 115 (1990)

    1990

  4. [4]

    L. D. McLerran and R. Venugopalan, Phys. Rev. D49, 2233 (1994), arXiv:hep-ph/9309289

    work page Pith review arXiv 1994

  5. [5]

    L. D. McLerran and R. Venugopalan, Phys. Rev. D49, 3352 (1994), arXiv:hep-ph/9311205

    work page Pith review arXiv 1994

  6. [6]

    L. D. McLerran and R. Venugopalan, Phys. Rev. D50, 2225 (1994), arXiv:hep-ph/9402335

    work page arXiv 1994

  7. [7]

    The Color Glass Condensate

    F. Gelis, E. Iancu, J. Jalilian-Marian, and R. Venu- gopalan, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.60, 463 (2010), arXiv:1002.0333 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2010

  8. [8]

    The Color Glass Condensate and High Energy Scattering in QCD

    E. Iancu and R. Venugopalan, “The Color glass con- densate and high-energy scattering in QCD,” inQuark- gluon plasma 4, edited by R. C. Hwa and X.-N. Wang (2003) pp. 249–3363, arXiv:hep-ph/0303204

    work page Pith review arXiv 2003

  9. [9]

    Balitsky, Nucl

    I. Balitsky, Nucl. Phys. B463, 99 (1996), arXiv:hep- ph/9509348

    work page arXiv 1996

  10. [10]

    Y. V. Kovchegov, Phys. Rev. D60, 034008 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9901281

    work page Pith review arXiv 1999

  11. [11]

    Jalilian-Marian, A

    J. Jalilian-Marian, A. Kovner, A. Leonidov, and H. Weigert, Nucl. Phys. B504, 415 (1997), arXiv:hep- ph/9701284

    work page arXiv 1997

  12. [12]

    Jalilian-Marian, A

    J. Jalilian-Marian, A. Kovner, A. Leonidov, and H. Weigert, Phys. Rev. D59, 014014 (1998), arXiv:hep- ph/9706377

    work page arXiv 1998

  13. [13]

    Nonlinear Gluon Evolution in the Color Glass Condensate: I

    E. Iancu, A. Leonidov, and L. D. McLerran, Nucl. Phys. A692, 583 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0011241

    work page Pith review arXiv 2001

  14. [14]

    Nonlinear Gluon Evolution in the Color Glass Condensate: II

    E. Ferreiro, E. Iancu, A. Leonidov, and L. McLerran, Nucl. Phys. A703, 489 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0109115

    work page Pith review arXiv 2002

  15. [15]

    Boer et al.,Gluons and the quark sea at high energies: Distributions, polarization, tomography,1108.1713

    D. Boeret al., (2011), arXiv:1108.1713 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2011

  16. [16]

    Electron Ion Collider: The Next QCD Frontier - Understanding the glue that binds us all

    A. Accardiet al., Eur. Phys. J. A52, 268 (2016), arXiv:1212.1701 [nucl-ex]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  17. [17]

    Science Requirements and Detector Concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report

    R. Abdul Khaleket al., Nucl. Phys. A1026, 122447 (2022), arXiv:2103.05419 [physics.ins-det]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2022

  18. [18]

    Abdul Khalek et al., in2022 Snowmass Summer Study(2022),2203.13199

    R. Abdul Khaleket al., (2022), arXiv:2203.13199 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  19. [19]

    Forward trijet production in proton-nucleus collisions: gluon initiated channel

    P. Caucal, M. G. Morales, and F. Salazar, (2026), arXiv:2604.07509 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  20. [20]

    Marquet, Nucl

    C. Marquet, Nucl. Phys. A796, 41 (2007), arXiv:0708.0231 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2007

  21. [21]

    Universality of Unintegrated Gluon Distributions at small x

    F. Dominguez, C. Marquet, B.-W. Xiao, and F. Yuan, Phys. Rev. D83, 105005 (2011), arXiv:1101.0715 [hep- ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2011

  22. [22]

    Kharzeev, E

    D. Kharzeev, E. Levin, and L. McLerran, Nucl. Phys. A748, 627 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0403271

    work page arXiv 2005

  23. [23]

    Jalilian-Marian, Nucl

    J. Jalilian-Marian, Nucl. Phys. A770, 210 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0509338

    work page arXiv 2006

  24. [24]

    Stasto, B.-W

    A. Stasto, B.-W. Xiao, and F. Yuan, Phys. Lett. B716, 430 (2012), arXiv:1109.1817 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2012

  25. [25]

    Akcakaya, A

    E. Akcakaya, A. Sch¨ afer, and J. Zhou, Phys. Rev. D 87, 054010 (2013), arXiv:1208.4965 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2013

  26. [26]

    Jalilian-Marian and A

    J. Jalilian-Marian and A. H. Rezaeian, Phys. Rev. D 86, 034016 (2012), arXiv:1204.1319 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2012

  27. [27]

    Kutak and S

    K. Kutak and S. Sapeta, Phys. Rev. D86, 094043 (2012), arXiv:1205.5035 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2012

  28. [28]

    Lappi and H

    T. Lappi and H. Mantysaari, Nucl. Phys. A908, 51 (2013), arXiv:1209.2853 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2013

  29. [29]

    A. H. Rezaeian, Phys. Rev. D86, 094016 (2012), arXiv:1209.0478 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2012

  30. [30]

    Stasto, B.-W

    A. Stasto, B.-W. Xiao, and D. Zaslavsky, Phys. Rev. D 86, 014009 (2012), arXiv:1204.4861 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2012

  31. [31]

    Kovner and A

    A. Kovner and A. H. Rezaeian, Phys. Rev. D90, 014031 (2014), arXiv:1404.5632 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2014

  32. [32]

    van Hameren, P

    A. van Hameren, P. Kotko, K. Kutak, and S. Sapeta, Phys. Lett. B737, 335 (2014), arXiv:1404.6204 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2014

  33. [33]

    Kotko, K

    P. Kotko, K. Kutak, C. Marquet, E. Petreska, S. Sapeta, and A. van Hameren, JHEP09, 106 (2015), arXiv:1503.03421 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2015

  34. [34]

    Basso, V

    E. Basso, V. P. Goncalves, J. Nemchik, R. Pasech- nik, and M. Sumbera, Phys. Rev. D93, 034023 (2016), arXiv:1510.00650 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2016

  35. [35]

    Kovner and A

    A. Kovner and A. H. Rezaeian, Phys. Rev. D92, 074045 (2015), arXiv:1508.02412 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2015

  36. [36]

    Basso, V

    E. Basso, V. P. Goncalves, M. Krelina, J. Nemchik, and R. Pasechnik, Phys. Rev. D93, 094027 (2016), arXiv:1603.01893 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2016

  37. [37]

    A. H. Rezaeian, Phys. Rev. D93, 094030 (2016), arXiv:1603.07354 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2016

  38. [38]

    van Hameren, P

    A. van Hameren, P. Kotko, K. Kutak, C. Marquet, E. Petreska, and S. Sapeta, JHEP12, 034 (2016), [Erra- tum: JHEP 02, 158 (2019)], arXiv:1607.03121 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2016

  39. [39]

    D. Boer, P. J. Mulders, J. Zhou, and Y.-j. Zhou, JHEP 10, 196 (2017), arXiv:1702.08195 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2017

  40. [40]

    Hagiwara, Y

    Y. Hagiwara, Y. Hatta, R. Pasechnik, M. Tasevsky, and O. Teryaev, Phys. Rev. D96, 034009 (2017), arXiv:1706.01765 [hep-ph]. 9

    work page arXiv 2017

  41. [41]

    Beni´ c and A

    S. Beni´ c and A. Dumitru, Phys. Rev. D97, 014012 (2018), arXiv:1710.01991 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2018

  42. [42]

    J. L. Albacete, G. Giacalone, C. Marquet, and M. Matas, Phys. Rev. D99, 014002 (2019), arXiv:1805.05711 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  43. [43]

    Stasto, S.-Y

    A. Stasto, S.-Y. Wei, B.-W. Xiao, and F. Yuan, Phys. Lett. B784, 301 (2018), arXiv:1805.05712 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2018

  44. [44]

    Marquet, S.-Y

    C. Marquet, S.-Y. Wei, and B.-W. Xiao, Phys. Lett. B 802, 135253 (2020), arXiv:1909.08572 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  45. [45]

    van Hameren, P

    A. van Hameren, P. Kotko, K. Kutak, and S. Sapeta, Phys. Lett. B795, 511 (2019), arXiv:1903.01361 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  46. [46]

    V. P. Goncalves, Y. Lima, R. Pasechnik, and M. ˇSumbera, Phys. Rev. D101, 094019 (2020), arXiv:2003.02555 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  47. [47]

    Kolb´ e, K

    I. Kolb´ e, K. Roy, F. Salazar, B. Schenke, and R. Venu- gopalan, JHEP01, 052 (2021), arXiv:2008.04372 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  48. [48]

    van Hameren, P

    A. van Hameren, P. Kotko, K. Kutak, and S. Sapeta, Phys. Lett. B814, 136078 (2021), arXiv:2010.13066 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  49. [49]

    Beni´ c, O

    S. Beni´ c, O. Garcia-Montero, and A. Perkov, Phys. Rev. D105, 114052 (2022), arXiv:2203.01685 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  50. [50]

    M. A. Al-Mashad, A. van Hameren, H. Kakkad, P. Kotko, K. Kutak, P. van Mechelen, and S. Sapeta, JHEP12, 131 (2022), arXiv:2210.06613 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  51. [51]

    Caucal, Z.-B

    P. Caucal, Z.-B. Kang, P. Korcyl, F. Salazar, B. Schenke, T. Stebel, R. Venugopalan, and W. Zhao, (2025), arXiv:2512.21466 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    A. H. Mueller, B.-W. Xiao, and F. Yuan, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 082301 (2013), arXiv:1210.5792 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2013

  53. [53]

    A. H. Mueller, B.-W. Xiao, and F. Yuan, Phys. Rev. D 88, 114010 (2013), arXiv:1308.2993 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2013

  54. [54]

    Zheng, E

    L. Zheng, E. C. Aschenauer, J. H. Lee, and B.-W. Xiao, Phys. Rev. D89, 074037 (2014), arXiv:1403.2413 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2014

  55. [55]

    Altinoluk, N

    T. Altinoluk, N. Armesto, G. Beuf, and A. H. Rezaeian, Phys. Lett. B758, 373 (2016), arXiv:1511.07452 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2016

  56. [56]

    Metz and J

    A. Metz and J. Zhou, Phys. Rev. D84, 051503 (2011), arXiv:1105.1991 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2011

  57. [57]

    Dominguez, J.-W

    F. Dominguez, J.-W. Qiu, B.-W. Xiao, and F. Yuan, Phys. Rev. D85, 045003 (2012), arXiv:1109.6293 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2012

  58. [58]

    Dumitru, T

    A. Dumitru, T. Lappi, and V. Skokov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 252301 (2015), arXiv:1508.04438 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2015

  59. [59]

    Dumitru and V

    A. Dumitru and V. Skokov, Phys. Rev. D94, 014030 (2016), arXiv:1605.02739 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2016

  60. [60]

    D. Boer, P. J. Mulders, C. Pisano, and J. Zhou, JHEP 08, 001 (2016), arXiv:1605.07934 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2016

  61. [61]

    Dumitru, V

    A. Dumitru, V. Skokov, and T. Ullrich, Phys. Rev. C 99, 015204 (2019), arXiv:1809.02615 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  62. [62]

    Probing the Small-$x$ Gluon Tomography in Correlated Hard Diffractive Dijet Production in DIS

    Y. Hatta, B.-W. Xiao, and F. Yuan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 202301 (2016), arXiv:1601.01585 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  63. [63]

    Kotko, K

    P. Kotko, K. Kutak, S. Sapeta, A. M. Stasto, and M. Strikman, Eur. Phys. J. C77, 353 (2017), arXiv:1702.03063 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2017

  64. [64]

    M¨ antysaari, N

    H. M¨ antysaari, N. Mueller, and B. Schenke, Phys. Rev. D99, 074004 (2019), arXiv:1902.05087 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  65. [65]

    Boussarie, A

    R. Boussarie, A. V. Grabovsky, L. Szymanowski, and S. Wallon, Phys. Rev. D100, 074020 (2019), arXiv:1905.07371 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  66. [66]

    Salazar and B

    F. Salazar and B. Schenke, Phys. Rev. D100, 034007 (2019), arXiv:1905.03763 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  67. [67]

    Bergabo and J

    F. Bergabo and J. Jalilian-Marian, Nucl. Phys. A1018, 122358 (2022), arXiv:2108.10428 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  68. [68]

    Zhao, M.-M

    Y.-Y. Zhao, M.-M. Xu, L.-Z. Chen, D.-H. Zhang, and Y.-F. Wu, Phys. Rev. D104, 114032 (2021), arXiv:2105.08818 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  69. [69]

    Boussarie, H

    R. Boussarie, H. M¨ antysaari, F. Salazar, and B. Schenke, JHEP09, 178 (2021), arXiv:2106.11301 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  70. [70]

    Boer and C

    D. Boer and C. Setyadi, Phys. Rev. D104, 074006 (2021), arXiv:2106.15148 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  71. [71]

    Hagiwara, C

    Y. Hagiwara, C. Zhang, J. Zhou, and Y.-j. Zhou, Phys. Rev. D104, 094021 (2021), arXiv:2106.13466 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  72. [72]

    Iancu, A

    E. Iancu, A. H. Mueller, and D. N. Triantafyllopoulos, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 202001 (2022), arXiv:2112.06353 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  73. [73]

    Taels, T

    P. Taels, T. Altinoluk, G. Beuf, and C. Marquet, JHEP 10, 184 (2022), arXiv:2204.11650 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  74. [74]

    Hatta, B.-W

    Y. Hatta, B.-W. Xiao, and F. Yuan, Phys. Rev. D106, 094015 (2022), arXiv:2205.08060 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  75. [75]

    Caucal, F

    P. Caucal, F. Salazar, B. Schenke, and R. Venugopalan, JHEP11, 169 (2022), arXiv:2208.13872 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  76. [76]

    Tong, B.-W

    X.-B. Tong, B.-W. Xiao, and Y.-Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 151902 (2023), arXiv:2211.01647 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  77. [77]

    Caucal, F

    P. Caucal, F. Salazar, B. Schenke, T. Stebel, and R. Venugopalan, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 081902 (2024), arXiv:2308.00022 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  78. [78]

    Tong, B.-W

    X.-B. Tong, B.-W. Xiao, and Y.-Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D109, 054004 (2024), arXiv:2310.20662 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  79. [79]

    Rodriguez-Aguilar, D

    B. Rodriguez-Aguilar, D. N. Triantafyllopoulos, and S. Y. Wei, Phys. Rev. D107, 114007 (2023), arXiv:2302.01106 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  80. [80]

    Caucal, F

    P. Caucal, F. Salazar, B. Schenke, T. Stebel, and R. Venugopalan, JHEP08, 062 (2023), arXiv:2304.03304 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

Showing first 80 references.