pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.22559 · v1 · pith:DRISVBSYnew · submitted 2026-06-21 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA · astro-ph.HE

Migration Traps as Variability Attractors: Optical/UV Signatures of Embedded Stellar-Mass Black Holes in Active Galactic Nucleus Disks

Jing-Tong Xing , Tong Liu , Mouyuan Sun , Ya-Ping Li , Shuying Zhou , Zhen-Yi Cai , Da-Bin Lin , Jian-Min Wang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 10:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.HE
keywords AGN variabilitystellar-mass black holesmigration trapsmagnetic reconnectionaccretion disksoptical/UV variabilitystructure functionslag-wavelength relation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Embedded stellar-mass black holes in AGN disks pile up at migration traps and drive excess short-timescale optical/UV variability through stochastic reconnection heating.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines whether stellar-mass black holes embedded in active galactic nucleus disks can produce detectable optical and ultraviolet variability signatures via migration-trap-driven magnetic heating. Migration traps cause these black holes to accumulate at preferred radii, triggering localized stochastic magnetic reconnection that heats the disk atmosphere in a self-regulated way. The process yields stronger variability on short timescales, flattened short-term structure functions, and departures from the standard time-lag versus wavelength scaling expected for thin accretion disks. A sympathetic reader would care because the mechanism supplies a physical link between otherwise hidden compact-object populations and observable continuum fluctuations without requiring changes in the overall accretion rate.

Core claim

By coupling a one-dimensional sBH population synthesis model with a corona-heated accretion-disk reprocessing variability framework, migration traps concentrate sBHs at preferred radii and generate localized, stochastic reconnection heating. The resulting heating is self-regulated: sBH pile-ups enhance the reconnection rate, while gap opening reduces the local gas density and partially suppresses the reconnection power. This heating produces excess short-timescale optical/UV variability, flattened short-term structure functions, and deviations from the standard τ∝λ^{4/3} lag-wavelength relation. These signatures are strongest at low-to-moderate Eddington ratios.

What carries the argument

Migration traps (torque-balance radii) that concentrate sBHs and drive localized stochastic magnetic reconnection heating, implemented via the coupling of a 1D population synthesis model to a corona-heated reprocessing framework.

If this is right

  • Excess short-timescale optical/UV variability appears in AGN disks.
  • Short-term structure functions become flattened.
  • The lag-wavelength relation deviates from τ∝λ^{4/3}.
  • Signatures reach maximum strength at low-to-moderate Eddington ratios and supply indirect evidence for embedded sBH populations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Existing long-term AGN light-curve archives could be re-analyzed for the predicted short-timescale excess and lag deviations to test the mechanism directly.
  • The self-regulated heating sets an upper limit on local sBH density once gap opening becomes important, offering a way to constrain compact-object populations without resolving individual objects.
  • If the variability channel operates, it could contribute to the observed diversity of AGN continuum behavior at wavelengths where coronal reprocessing alone under-predicts the amplitude.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that sBHs migrate efficiently toward torque-balance radii and accumulate at migration traps in numbers large enough to produce observable reconnection heating, without gap opening fully suppressing the local gas density and reconnection power.

What would settle it

Multi-wavelength monitoring campaigns of AGN at low-to-moderate Eddington ratios that show neither excess short-timescale optical/UV variability nor deviations from the standard τ∝λ^{4/3} lag-wavelength relation would falsify the predicted signatures of sBH-driven reconnection heating.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.22559 by Da-Bin Lin, Jian-Min Wang, Jing-Tong Xing, Mouyuan Sun, Shuying Zhou, Tong Liu, Ya-Ping Li, Zhen-Yi Cai.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Migration regime maps in the M-R phase space for different Eddington ratios. Left panel: ˙m = 0.02; middle panel: m˙ = 0.05; right panel: ˙m = 0.20. The color regions represent the dominant migration states: blue/light blue indicates inward migration (including Type I migration and transition zone), yellow/orange indicates accretion-driven outward migration (and transition zone), and deep red indicates inw… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Radial evolution of the sBH surface number density and surface mass density over 5×105 yr. Top panels: ˙m = 0.05; bottom panels: ˙m = 0.20. In the moderate-accretion model, a secondary peak forms near log10(R/RS) ≃ 1.5, corresponding to the migration trap identified in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Radial profile of the sBH heating ratio Φ(R, t) = Q 0 sBH(R, t)/Q0 vis(R) for different accretion rates and sBH population ages. Colors denote different accretion rates, ˙m = 0.02, 0.05, and 0.20, while line styles denote im￾ported population times timp = 102 , 5 × 104 , and 5 × 105 yr. At early times, the sBH population had not yet accumu￾lated efficiently and Φ ≪ 1 over most radii. As migration proceeds,… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Temporal evolution of the disk thermal response and multi-band light curves at ˙m = 0.05. The left panel shows an sBH-quiescent stage, while the right panel shows a late sBH-active stage after the embedded population has accumulated near the migration trap. From top to bottom, the panels show the background magnetic heating Q + mc, the mid-plane temperature Tc, the effective temperature Teff , and the synt… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Statistical variability diagnostics of the simulated 3000 ˚A light curves as functions of Eddington ratio and imported sBH population age. The upper-left panel shows the effective DRW damping timescale obtained by fitting the DRW structure– function form over ∆t ≈ 100–4000 days (100 days up to the per-segment maximum). The red dotted curve and shaded region show the observed Ren et al. (2024) relation and … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Inter-band lag and coherence diagnostics for the simulated continuum light curves as functions of the Eddington ratio ˙m and the imported sBH population age timp. Marker style encodes timp: 100 (circles), 102 (squares), 5 × 104 (diamonds), and 5 × 105 yr (triangles); the timp = 100 yr case is the CHAR-like reference state. Upper left: lag between 5100 ˚A and 3000 ˚A, measured from the coherence-weighted ph… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Sensitivity of the variability diagnostics to the gap-depletion floor fgap,min, for a representative low-accre￾tion, late-time model ( ˙m = 0.02, timp = 5 × 105 yr). (a) 3000 ˚A structure function for fgap,min = 0.2, 0.5, 0.9, and 1.0. A deeper gap (smaller fgap,min) lowers the thermal in￾ertia of the depleted annulus and raises the SF at short and intermediate time separations, while all models converge t… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate whether embedded stellar-mass black holes (sBHs) in active galactic nucleus (AGN) disks can leave observable optical/UV variability signatures through migration-trap-driven magnetic heating. This mechanism operates when sBHs migrating toward torque-balance radii pile up near migration traps, triggering localized, stochastic magnetic reconnection that heats the disk atmosphere. It is potentially important because it provides a physical source of non-coronal disk heating and directly links optical/UV continuum variability to otherwise hidden compact-object populations. By coupling a one-dimensional sBH population synthesis model with a corona-heated accretion-disk reprocessing variability framework, we show that migration traps concentrate sBHs at preferred radii and generate localized, stochastic reconnection heating. The resulting heating is self-regulated: sBH pile-ups enhance the reconnection rate, while gap opening reduces the local gas density and partially suppresses the reconnection power. This heating produces excess short-timescale optical/UV variability, flattened short-term structure functions, and deviations from the standard $\tau\propto\lambda^{4/3}$ lag-wavelength relation, which describes the time delay between variability at different wavelengths for a standard thin accretion disk. These signatures are strongest at low-to-moderate Eddington ratios, and related observations could provide indirect evidence for embedded compact-object populations in AGN disks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates whether embedded stellar-mass black holes (sBHs) in AGN disks produce observable optical/UV variability signatures via migration-trap-driven magnetic reconnection heating. It couples a one-dimensional sBH population synthesis model with a corona-heated accretion-disk reprocessing variability framework to argue that sBH pile-ups at torque-balance radii generate localized, stochastic reconnection heating that is self-regulated by gap opening; this is claimed to yield excess short-timescale variability, flattened short-term structure functions, and deviations from the standard τ∝λ^{4/3} lag-wavelength relation, with the effects strongest at low-to-moderate Eddington ratios.

Significance. If the quantitative outputs of the coupled model confirm that net reconnection heating after gap-opening suppression exceeds background coronal levels sufficiently to drive the claimed variability signatures, the work would link otherwise hidden compact-object populations to AGN continuum variability and provide falsifiable predictions for structure functions and lag relations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results (coupling of population synthesis and reprocessing framework)] The central claim requires that the 1D population synthesis produces net reconnection heating (after self-regulation by gap opening) that exceeds background levels enough to generate observable excess variability and lag deviations. The manuscript states this outcome but supplies no numerical results from the synthesis, such as trapped sBH column, reconnection luminosity relative to coronal heating, or surface-density thresholds at low-to-moderate Eddington ratios, preventing verification that the signatures are actually produced.
  2. [Methods (population synthesis and reprocessing coupling)] The self-regulated heating description is presented as an independent output that produces flattened structure functions and deviations from τ∝λ^{4/3}. Without explicit equations or parameter values for the reconnection rate, the gap-opening suppression factor, or the resulting heating profile in the reprocessing framework, it is unclear whether these deviations are robust predictions or shaped by choices in the population synthesis.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and text use standard notation for the lag-wavelength relation but would benefit from a one-sentence reminder of its thin-disk origin for broader accessibility.
  2. A table listing the key parameters of the 1D population synthesis model (e.g., migration rates, trap radii, Eddington ratio ranges) would improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive report and for highlighting the need for more explicit quantitative support. We agree that the central claims would be strengthened by additional numerical outputs and model equations, and we will revise the manuscript to incorporate these elements.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results (coupling of population synthesis and reprocessing framework)] The central claim requires that the 1D population synthesis produces net reconnection heating (after self-regulation by gap opening) that exceeds background levels enough to generate observable excess variability and lag deviations. The manuscript states this outcome but supplies no numerical results from the synthesis, such as trapped sBH column, reconnection luminosity relative to coronal heating, or surface-density thresholds at low-to-moderate Eddington ratios, preventing verification that the signatures are actually produced.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would be improved by supplying these numerical results to allow verification. In the revised version we will add a dedicated results subsection (or appendix) that reports the outputs of the 1D population synthesis, including trapped sBH column densities at the migration traps, the ratio of reconnection luminosity to background coronal heating across the explored Eddington-ratio range, and the local surface-density thresholds after gap-opening suppression. These quantities will be shown to exceed the levels needed to produce the reported excess short-timescale variability, flattened structure functions, and lag deviations. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods (population synthesis and reprocessing coupling)] The self-regulated heating description is presented as an independent output that produces flattened structure functions and deviations from τ∝λ^{4/3}. Without explicit equations or parameter values for the reconnection rate, the gap-opening suppression factor, or the resulting heating profile in the reprocessing framework, it is unclear whether these deviations are robust predictions or shaped by choices in the population synthesis.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the absence of the explicit equations leaves the robustness of the predictions less transparent. We will expand the methods section to include the full expressions for the reconnection rate (based on local magnetic-field strength and plasma-β), the analytic form of the gap-opening suppression factor, and the procedure by which the localized heating profile is injected into the corona-heated reprocessing variability code. A table of all adopted parameter values will also be added so that readers can reproduce and assess the sensitivity of the structure-function and lag results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained via model coupling

full rationale

The paper couples a 1D sBH population synthesis model to a corona-heated reprocessing framework and presents the resulting variability signatures (excess short-timescale variability, flattened structure functions, lag deviations) as outputs of that coupling, including the described self-regulation by pile-up enhancement and gap-opening suppression. No equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations are quoted that would make any claimed prediction equivalent to its inputs by construction. The central claim therefore retains independent content from the synthesis-reprocessing link and does not reduce to self-definition or renaming.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard AGN disk assumptions and the migration-trap concept drawn from prior literature; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard thin accretion disk with τ∝λ^{4/3} lag-wavelength relation as baseline
    Invoked when stating deviations produced by the new heating mechanism.
  • domain assumption Stellar-mass black holes migrate efficiently and pile up at migration traps in AGN disks
    Core premise of the 1D population synthesis model.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5799 in / 1390 out tokens · 33914 ms · 2026-06-26T10:10:22.254098+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

95 extracted references · 91 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , keywords =

    Abramowicz, M. A., Czerny, B., Lasota, J. P., et al.\ 1988, , 332, 646. doi:10.1086/166683

    work page doi:10.1086/166683 1988

  2. [2]

    J.\ 2010, Astrophysics of Planet Formation (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ

    Armitage, P. J.\ 2010, Astrophysics of Planet Formation (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press)

    2010

  3. [3]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/165

    Bartos, I., Kocsis, B., Haiman, Z., et al.\ 2017, , 835, 2, 165. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/165

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/165 2017

  4. [4]

    M., Mac Low, M.-M., McKernan, B., et al.\ 2016, , 819, 2, L17

    Bellovary, J. M., Mac Low, M.-M., McKernan, B., et al.\ 2016, , 819, 2, L17. doi:10.3847/2041-8205/819/2/L17

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8205/819/2/l17 2016

  5. [5]

    doi:10.1038/nature14277

    Ben \' tez-Llambay, P., Masset, F., Koenigsberger, G., et al.\ 2015, , 520, 7545, 63. doi:10.1038/nature14277

    work page doi:10.1038/nature14277 2015

  6. [6]

    Blandford, R. D. & McKee, C. F.\ 1982, , 255, 419. doi:10.1086/159843

    work page doi:10.1086/159843 1982

  7. [7]

    MNRAS , author =

    Bondi, H.\ 1952, , 112, 195. doi:10.1093/mnras/112.2.195

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/112.2.195 1952

  8. [8]

    J., Shen, Y., Blaes, O., et al.\ 2021, Science, 373, 6556, 789

    Burke, C. J., Shen, Y., Blaes, O., et al.\ 2021, Science, 373, 6556, 789. doi:10.1126/science.abg9933

    work page doi:10.1126/science.abg9933 2021

  9. [9]

    M., Bentz, M

    Cackett, E. M., Bentz, M. C., & Kara, E.\ 2021, iScience, 24, 6, 102557. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021.102557

    work page doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021.102557 2021

  10. [10]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab091

    Cai, Z.-Y., Wang, J.-X., Zhu, F.-F., et al.\ 2018, , 855, 2, 117. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab091

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab091 2018

  11. [11]

    Cao, Z., Li, Y.-P., Lin, D. N. C., et al.\ 2026, , 999, 1, 55. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae4029

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae4029 2026

  12. [12]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad16ea

    Chen, J., Sun, M., & Zhang, Z.-X.\ 2024, , 962, 2, 134. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad16ea

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad16ea 2024

  13. [13]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acc45f

    Chen, K., Ren, J., & Dai, Z.-G.\ 2023, , 948, 2, 136. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acc45f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acc45f 2023

  14. [14]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2269

    Choksi, N., Chiang, E., Fung, J., et al.\ 2023, , 525, 2, 2806. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2269

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2269 2023

  15. [15]

    Collin-Souffrin, S.\ 1991, , 249, 344

    1991

  16. [16]

    M., Horne, K., et al.\ 2015, , 806, 1, 129

    Edelson, R., Gelbord, J. M., Horne, K., et al.\ 2015, , 806, 1, 129. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/129

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/806/1/129 2015

  17. [17]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346781

    El Mellah, I., Cerutti, B., & Crinquand, B.\ 2023, , 677, A67. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346781

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346781 2023

  18. [18]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staf237

    Epstein-Martin, M., Tagawa, H., Haiman, Z., et al.\ 2025, , 537, 4, 3396. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf237

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf237 2025

  19. [19]

    M., Denney, K

    Fausnaugh, M. M., Denney, K. D., Barth, A. J., et al.\ 2016, , 821, 1, 56. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/821/1/56

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/821/1/56 2016

  20. [20]

    F.\ 2001, , 553, 1, 174

    Gammie, C. F.\ 2001, , 553, 1, 174. doi:10.1086/320631

    work page doi:10.1086/320631 2001

  21. [21]

    C., Metzger, B

    Generozov, A., Stone, N. C., Metzger, B. D., et al.\ 2018, , 478, 3, 4030. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1262

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1262 2018

  22. [22]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stt167

    Giannios, D.\ 2013, , 431, 1, 355. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt167

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt167 2013

  23. [23]

    & Stone, N

    Gilbaum, S. & Stone, N. C.\ 2022, , 928, 2, 191. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac4ded

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac4ded 2022

  24. [24]

    2003, MNRAS, 340, 227, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06286.x

    Goodman, J.\ 2003, , 339, 4, 937. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06241.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06241.x 2003

  25. [25]

    & Cassak, P

    Hesse, M. & Cassak, P. A.\ 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 125, 2, e25935. doi:10.1029/2018JA025935

    work page doi:10.1029/2018ja025935 2020

  26. [26]

    Magnetically Driven Accretion Flows in the Kerr Metric

    Hirose, S., Krolik, J. H., De Villiers, J.-P., et al.\ 2004, , 606, 2, 1083. doi:10.1086/383184

    work page doi:10.1086/383184 2004

  27. [27]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae2612

    Ida, S., Li, Y.-P., Pan, J.-P., et al.\ 2026, , 997, 2, 160. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae2612

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae2612 2026

  28. [28]

    , keywords =

    Ivanov, P. B., Papaloizou, J. C. B., & Polnarev, A. G.\ 1999, , 307, 1, 79. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02623.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02623.x 1999

  29. [29]

    M., et al.\ 2019, , 885, 2, 144

    Jiang, Y.-F., Blaes, O., Stone, J. M., et al.\ 2019, , 885, 2, 144. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4a00

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4a00 2019

  30. [30]

    S., Dov c iak, M., Papadakis, I

    Kammoun, E. S., Dov c iak, M., Papadakis, I. E., et al.\ 2021, , 907, 1, 20. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abcb93

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abcb93 2021

  31. [31]

    D., Tanaka, H., Muto, T., et al.\ 2015, , 448, 1, 994

    Kanagawa, K. D., Tanaka, H., Muto, T., et al.\ 2015, , 448, 1, 994. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv025

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv025 2015

  32. [32]

    D., Tanaka, H., & Szuszkiewicz, E.\ 2018, , 861, 2, 140

    Kanagawa, K. D., Tanaka, H., & Szuszkiewicz, E.\ 2018, , 861, 2, 140. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aac8d9

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aac8d9 2018

  33. [33]

    Kato, S., Fukue, J., & Mineshige, S.\ 2008, Black-Hole Accretion Disks: Toward a New Paradigm (Kyoto: Kyoto Univ. Press)

    2008

  34. [34]

    2004, MNRAS, 350, 1301, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07713.x

    King, A. R., Pringle, J. E., West, R. G., et al.\ 2004, , 348, 1, 111. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07322.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07322.x 2004

  35. [35]

    doi:10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/118

    Koz owski, S.\ 2016, , 826, 2, 118. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/118

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/826/2/118 2016

  36. [36]

    H., Horne, K., Kallman, T

    Krolik, J. H., Horne, K., Kallman, T. R., et al.\ 1991, , 371, 541. doi:10.1086/169918

    work page doi:10.1086/169918 1991

  37. [37]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad7117

    Laune, J., Li, R., & Lai, D.\ 2024, , 975, 2, 296. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad7117

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad7117 2024

  38. [38]

    doi:10.1038/s41550-017-0372-1

    Lawrence, A.\ 2018, Nature Astronomy, 2, 102. doi:10.1038/s41550-017-0372-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-017-0372-1 2018

  39. [39]

    J., et al.\ 2024, , 974, 2, 271

    Lewin, C., Kara, E., Barth, A. J., et al.\ 2024, , 974, 2, 271. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6b08

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6b08 2024

  40. [40]

    , keywords =

    Levin, Y.\ 2007, , 374, 2, 515. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11155.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11155.x 2007

  41. [41]

    , keywords =

    Li, S.-L. & Cao, X.\ 2008, , 387, 1, L41. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2008.00480.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2008.00480.x 2008

  42. [42]

    Li, Y.-P., Chen, Y.-X., & Lin, D. N. C.\ 2023, , 526, 4, 5346. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3049

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3049 2023

  43. [43]

    Li, Y.-P., Chen, Y.-X., & Lin, D. N. C.\ 2024, , 971, 2, 130. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5a06

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5a06 2024

  44. [44]

    Li, Y.-P., Chen, Y.-X., Lin, D. N. C., et al.\ 2021, , 906, 1, 52. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abc883

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abc883 2021

  45. [45]

    F., Schekochihin, A

    Loureiro, N. F., Schekochihin, A. A., & Cowley, S. C.\ 2007, Physics of Plasmas, 14, 10, 100703. doi:10.1063/1.2783986

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2783986 2007

  46. [46]

    E.\ 1997, , 292, 3, 679

    Lyubarskii, Y. E.\ 1997, , 292, 3, 679. doi:10.1093/mnras/292.3.679

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/292.3.679 1997

  47. [47]

    S.\ 2017, , 472, 4, 4204

    Masset, F. S.\ 2017, , 472, 4, 4204. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2271

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2271 2017

  48. [48]

    M.\ 2013, , 430, L49

    McHardy, I. M.\ 2013, , 430, L49. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/sls048

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/sls048 2013

  49. [49]

    M., Cameron, D

    McHardy, I. M., Cameron, D. T., Dwelly, T., et al.\ 2014, , 444, 2, 1469. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1636

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1636 2014

  50. [50]

    McKernan, B., Ford, K. E. S., Kocsis, B., et al.\ 2014, , 441, 1, 900. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu553

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu553 2014

  51. [51]

    McKernan, B., Ford, K. E. S., Lyra, W., et al.\ 2012, , 425, 1, 460. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21486.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21486.x 2012

  52. [52]

    McLaughlin, S. A. J., Mullaney, J. R., & Littlefair, S. P.\ 2024, , 529, 3, 2877. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae721

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae721 2024

  53. [53]

    Plasmoid formation in global GRMHD simulations and AGN flares[J/OL]

    Nathanail, A., Fromm, C. M., Porth, O., et al.\ 2020, , 495, 2, 1549. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1165

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1165 2020

  54. [54]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1118

    Nathanail, A., Mpisketzis, V., Porth, O., et al.\ 2022, , 513, 3, 4267. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1118

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1118 2022

  55. [55]

    S., Murphy, N

    Ni, L., Lukin, V. S., Murphy, N. A., et al.\ 2018, , 852, 2, 95. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa9edb

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa9edb 2018

  56. [56]

    Noble, S. C. & Krolik, J. H.\ 2009, , 703, 1, 964. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/703/1/964

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/703/1/964 2009

  57. [57]

    J., Kolb, U., & Willems, B

    Paardekooper, S.-J. & Papaloizou, J. C. B.\ 2009, , 394, 4, 2297. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14512.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14512.x 2009

  58. [58]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae261a

    Pan, J., Li, Y.-P., Chen, Y.-X., et al.\ 2026, , 997, 2, 161. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae261a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae261a 2026

  59. [59]

    B., Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., et al

    Pollack, J. B., Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., et al.\ 1996, , 124, 1, 62. doi:10.1006/icar.1996.0190

    work page doi:10.1006/icar.1996.0190 1996

  60. [60]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad7b2a

    Ren, G., Zhou, S., Sun, M., et al.\ 2024, , 975, 2, 160. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad7b2a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad7b2a 2024

  61. [61]

    , keywords =

    Ripperda, B., Liska, M., Chatterjee, K., et al.\ 2022, , 924, 2, L32. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac46a1

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac46a1 2022

  62. [62]

    F., Chernoglazov, A., et al

    Ripperda, B., Mahlmann, J. F., Chernoglazov, A., et al.\ 2021, Journal of Plasma Physics, 87, 5, 905870512. doi:10.1017/S0022377821000957

    work page doi:10.1017/s0022377821000957 2021

  63. [63]

    M., Chiang, E

    Rosenthal, M. M., Chiang, E. I., Ginzburg, S., et al.\ 2020, , 498, 2, 2054. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1721

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1721 2020

  64. [64]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab20ca

    Secunda, A., Bellovary, J., Mac Low, M.-M., et al.\ 2019, , 878, 2, 85. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab20ca

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab20ca 2019

  65. [65]

    Shakura, N. I. & Sunyaev, R. A.\ 1973, , 24, 337

    1973

  66. [66]

    T., Strauss, M

    Shen, Y., Richards, G. T., Strauss, M. A., et al.\ 2011, , 194, 2, 45. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/194/2/45

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/194/2/45 2011

  67. [67]

    & Begelman, M

    Sikora, M. & Begelman, M. C.\ 2013, , 764, 2, L24. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/764/2/L24

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/764/2/l24 2013

  68. [68]

    2003, MNRAS, 340, 227, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06286.x

    Sirko, E. & Goodman, J.\ 2003, , 341, 2, 501. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06431.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06431.x 2003

  69. [69]

    C.\ 2025, , 695, A268

    Son, S., Kim, M., & Ho, L. C.\ 2025, , 695, A268. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452467

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452467 2025

  70. [70]

    C., Metzger, B

    Stone, N. C., Metzger, B. D., & Haiman, Z.\ 2017, , 464, 1, 946. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2260

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2260 2017

  71. [71]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adef13

    Su, Z.-B., Cai, Z.-Y., Guo, H., et al.\ 2025, , 990, 1, 10. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adef13

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adef13 2025

  72. [72]

    N., et al.\ 2020a, , 891, 2, 178

    Sun, M., Xue, Y., Brandt, W. N., et al.\ 2020a, , 891, 2, 178. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab789e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab789e

  73. [73]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abb1c4

    Sun, M., Xue, Y., Guo, H., et al.\ 2020b, , 902, 1, 7. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abb1c4

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abb1c4

  74. [74]

    , keywords =

    Tagawa, H., Haiman, Z., & Kocsis, B.\ 2020, , 898, 1, 25. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab9b8c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab9b8c 2020

  75. [75]

    S., Haiman, Z., et al.\ 2022, , 927, 1, 41

    Tagawa, H., Kimura, S. S., Haiman, Z., et al.\ 2022, , 927, 1, 41. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac45f8

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac45f8 2022

  76. [76]

    S., Haiman, Z., et al.\ 2023, , 946, 1, L3

    Tagawa, H., Kimura, S. S., Haiman, Z., et al.\ 2023, , 946, 1, L3. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acc103

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acc103 2023

  77. [77]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab77af

    Tanaka, H., Murase, K., & Tanigawa, T.\ 2020, , 891, 2, 143. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab77af

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab77af 2020

  78. [78]

    R.\ 2002, , 565, 2, 1257

    Tanaka, H., Takeuchi, T., & Ward, W. R.\ 2002, , 565, 2, 1257. doi:10.1086/324713

    work page doi:10.1086/324713 2002

  79. [79]

    & Tanaka, H.\ 2016, , 823, 1, 48

    Tanigawa, T. & Tanaka, H.\ 2016, , 823, 1, 48. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/823/1/48

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/823/1/48 2016

  80. [80]

    Tan, A. H. T., Wolf, C., Amrutha, N., et al.\ 2026, . doi:10.1093/mnras/stag1052

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stag1052 2026

Showing first 80 references.