pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.23635 · v1 · pith:FK5NYP65new · submitted 2026-06-22 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th

Equatorial Periodic Orbits and Gravitational Wave Phenomenology around Spherically-symmetric vacuum solution in Freund-Nambu scalar-tensor gravity

Dhruba Jyoti Gogoi , Jyatsnasree Bora , Himanshu Chaudhary , M. Yousaf , G. Mustafa This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 07:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-th
keywords scalar-tensor gravityFreund-Nambugravitational wavesextreme mass ratio inspiralsperiodic orbitsISCOphase dephasingLISA
0
0 comments X

The pith

Scalar-tensor corrections in Freund-Nambu gravity produce macroscopic temporal dephasing in EMRI gravitational wave bursts.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines test particle dynamics around an exact spherically symmetric vacuum solution of Freund-Nambu scalar-tensor gravity that extends the Janis-Newman-Winicour naked singularity through a geometric coupling q and a scalar-particle coupling g_s. These parameters alter the radii of the innermost stable circular orbit and the marginally bound orbit while permitting families of bound periodic equatorial trajectories, including extreme zoom-whirl orbits. When the Numerical Kludge waveform method is applied to extreme mass-ratio inspirals, the scalar-tensor terms generate a measurable time offset between successive high-frequency gravitational wave bursts, even though the spatial shape of the orbit is unchanged. A reader would care because the offset supplies an observable signature that future space-based detectors could use to test scalar-tensor extensions of general relativity.

Core claim

In the Freund-Nambu scalar-tensor framework the vacuum solution supports equatorial periodic orbits whose radial and angular periods depend on the couplings q and g_s. Application of the Numerical Kludge method to extreme mass-ratio inspirals shows that scalar-tensor corrections induce a macroscopic temporal dephasing in the high-frequency gravitational wave bursts, although the spatial topology of the orbit remains the same.

What carries the argument

The geometric non-linear coupling q and direct scalar-particle coupling g_s in the spherically symmetric vacuum solution, which modify the constants of geodesic motion and thereby the accumulated gravitational wave phase.

If this is right

  • The innermost stable circular orbit moves inward for positive g_s.
  • The marginally bound orbit is also displaced by the couplings.
  • Extreme zoom-whirl orbits exhibit stronger periapsis precession than in general relativity.
  • High-frequency gravitational wave bursts acquire a macroscopic temporal dephasing that scales with the scalar couplings.
  • The phase offset persists even when the spatial orbit is topologically identical to the general-relativity case and could be used by LISA to constrain the couplings.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The reported dephasing could be folded into LISA template banks to set quantitative limits on the Freund-Nambu parameters.
  • Analogous phase shifts may appear in other scalar-tensor models that admit comparable vacuum solutions.
  • Confirmation would require checking that full numerical waveforms reproduce the size of the shift obtained from the kludge method.

Load-bearing premise

The Numerical Kludge approximation applied to these EMRIs reproduces the phase dephasing without introducing large systematic errors from the approximation or from the choice of geodesic integration.

What would settle it

A LISA detection of an EMRI whose parameters are consistent with the scalar-tensor solution yet whose high-frequency bursts exhibit no measurable temporal dephasing relative to the general-relativity prediction would falsify the central claim.

read the original abstract

We investigate test particle dynamics and gravitational wave (GW) phenomenology in an exact spherically symmetric vacuum solution of Freund - Nambu scalar - tensor gravity. This framework generalizes the Janis - Newman - Winicour (JNW) naked singularity via a geometric non - linear coupling $q$ and a direct scalar - particle coupling $g_s$. We demonstrate that these parameters systematically modify the Innermost Stable Circular Orbit (ISCO) - which shifts inward for $g_s > 0$ - and the Marginally Bound Orbit (MBO). Furthermore, we classify bound periodic trajectories to isolate extreme zoom - whirl orbits exhibiting intense periapsis precession. By applying the Numerical Kludge method to Extreme Mass - Ratio Inspirals (EMRIs), we reveal that scalar - tensor corrections induce a macroscopic temporal dephasing in high - frequency GW bursts, even when the orbit's spatial topology is preserved. These unique phase shifts offer a robust diagnostic signature for future space-based observatories like LISA to probe the strong - field regime and constrain scalar - tensor extensions of general relativity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines test particle dynamics and gravitational wave phenomenology in an exact spherically symmetric vacuum solution of Freund-Nambu scalar-tensor gravity that generalizes the Janis-Newman-Winicour naked singularity through parameters q and g_s. It reports systematic shifts in the ISCO (inward for g_s > 0) and MBO, classifies bound periodic orbits including extreme zoom-whirl types with intense periapsis precession, and applies the Numerical Kludge method to EMRIs to show that scalar-tensor corrections produce macroscopic temporal dephasing in high-frequency GW bursts even when spatial orbit topology is preserved, positioning this as a diagnostic for LISA.

Significance. If the dephasing survives validation of the waveform model, the result would supply a concrete, falsifiable signature for distinguishing scalar-tensor extensions from GR in the strong-field regime using space-based detectors. The orbit classification adds value to the study of geodesics in non-GR metrics.

major comments (2)
  1. [GW phenomenology / Numerical Kludge implementation] The application of the Numerical Kludge method (described in the GW phenomenology section) to compute waveforms in the modified metric lacks any reported convergence study, error budget, or cross-check against an independent model such as a Teukolsky-like or self-force calculation. Because the metric functions differ from Schwarzschild, GR-calibrated kludge error bounds do not automatically transfer, leaving open whether the claimed macroscopic dephasing is physical or an artifact of the quadrupole/octupole truncation or time parametrization.
  2. [GW phenomenology section] The central claim that dephasing occurs 'even when the orbit's spatial topology is preserved' is load-bearing for the diagnostic signature but is not supported by an explicit demonstration that phase accumulation arises solely from the scalar-tensor corrections rather than from coordinate-time versus proper-time differences or other parametrization effects introduced by the modified metric functions.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'high-frequency GW bursts' from EMRIs, but LISA targets the millihertz band; a brief clarification of the relevant frequency content would improve precision.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and constructive suggestions. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we will make to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [GW phenomenology / Numerical Kludge implementation] The application of the Numerical Kludge method (described in the GW phenomenology section) to compute waveforms in the modified metric lacks any reported convergence study, error budget, or cross-check against an independent model such as a Teukolsky-like or self-force calculation. Because the metric functions differ from Schwarzschild, GR-calibrated kludge error bounds do not automatically transfer, leaving open whether the claimed macroscopic dephasing is physical or an artifact of the quadrupole/octupole truncation or time parametrization.

    Authors: We agree that the current manuscript does not present a dedicated convergence study or error budget tailored to the modified metric. In the revised version we will add a subsection reporting (i) the dependence of the extracted dephasing on the number of retained multipoles (quadrupole through octupole and higher), (ii) the effect of varying the time-step and integration tolerance in the geodesic solver, and (iii) a direct comparison of the kludge waveforms against the exact quadrupole formula evaluated along the same geodesics. These tests will quantify the truncation error for the specific metric functions. A full Teukolsky or self-force calculation for the Freund-Nambu solution lies outside the scope of the present work and would require a separate theoretical development; we will therefore note this limitation explicitly while demonstrating that the reported dephasing remains robust under the controlled variations we can perform. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [GW phenomenology section] The central claim that dephasing occurs 'even when the orbit's spatial topology is preserved' is load-bearing for the diagnostic signature but is not supported by an explicit demonstration that phase accumulation arises solely from the scalar-tensor corrections rather than from coordinate-time versus proper-time differences or other parametrization effects introduced by the modified metric functions.

    Authors: We will revise the GW phenomenology section to include an explicit side-by-side comparison: for each chosen periodic orbit we integrate the geodesic equations once in the modified metric and once in Schwarzschild, using identical initial conditions in coordinate time and the same affine parametrization. The resulting waveforms are then generated with the identical kludge implementation. Any residual phase difference after this controlled comparison can be attributed only to the scalar-tensor corrections in the metric coefficients and the resulting geodesic motion. We will also add a short paragraph clarifying that all phase accumulations are measured in coordinate time at a fixed observer radius, thereby removing proper-time versus coordinate-time ambiguities. These additions will make the claim fully supported by direct evidence. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The paper introduces q and g_s as independent theory parameters of the Freund-Nambu framework, derives the modified spherically symmetric vacuum metric, computes ISCO/MBO shifts and periodic orbits from the geodesic equation in that metric, and then applies the standard Numerical Kludge waveform construction to obtain GW phase shifts. None of these steps reduce by construction to a fitted quantity renamed as a prediction, nor does any load-bearing premise rest on a self-citation chain. The reported dephasing is an output computed from the modified metric functions and the kludge mapping; it is not defined in terms of itself.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the existence of the exact spherically symmetric vacuum solution, the validity of the Numerical Kludge for capturing scalar effects, and the interpretation of q and g_s as free theory parameters.

free parameters (2)
  • q
    Geometric non-linear coupling parameter that modifies the JNW solution; its value is not derived from first principles in the abstract.
  • g_s
    Direct scalar-particle coupling; treated as an adjustable parameter that controls ISCO shift and dephasing amplitude.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption An exact spherically symmetric vacuum solution exists in Freund-Nambu scalar-tensor gravity and generalizes the JNW naked singularity.
    Invoked at the outset to set up the background metric for all subsequent orbit and waveform calculations.
  • domain assumption The Numerical Kludge method remains accurate when scalar-tensor corrections are added to the geodesic motion.
    Required for the claim that the observed dephasing is physical rather than an artifact of the approximation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5752 in / 1467 out tokens · 27052 ms · 2026-06-26T07:21:46.575152+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 17 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Bailin and A

    D. Bailin and A. Love,Kaluza-klein theories,Rep. Prog. Phys.50(1987), no. 9 1087–1170

    1987

  2. [2]

    V. D. Gladush,Five-dimensional general relativity and kaluza–klein theory,Theor. Math. Phys. 136(2003), no. 3 1312–1324

    2003

  3. [3]

    Fujii and K

    Y. Fujii and K. Maeda,The scalar-tensor theory of gravitation. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 7, 2007

    2007

  4. [4]

    Brans and R

    C. Brans and R. H. Dicke,Mach’s principle and a relativistic theory of gravitation,Physical Review124(1961) 925–935

    1961

  5. [5]

    T. P. Sotiriou and V. Faraoni,f(R) Theories Of Gravity,Rev. Mod. Phys.82(2010) 451–497, [arXiv:0805.1726]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  6. [6]

    D. D. Doneva, F. M. Ramazanoğlu, H. O. Silva, T. P. Sotiriou, and S. S. Yazadjiev, Spontaneous scalarization,Rev. Mod. Phys.96(2024), no. 1 015004, [arXiv:2211.01766]

    arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Berti et al.,Testing General Relativity with Present and Future Astrophysical Observations, Class

    E. Berti et al.,Testing General Relativity with Present and Future Astrophysical Observations, Class. Quant. Grav.32(2015) 243001, [arXiv:1501.07274]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  8. [8]

    Barack et al.,Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap,Class

    L. Barack et al.,Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap,Class. Quant. Grav.36(2019), no. 14 143001, [arXiv:1806.05195]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  9. [9]

    P. G. Freund and Y. Nambu,Scalar Fields Coupled to the Trace of the Energy-Momentum Tensor,Physical Review174(Oct., 1968) 1741–1742

    1968

  10. [10]

    De Felice and S

    A. De Felice and S. Tsujikawa,f(r) theories,Living Reviews in Relativity13(2010) 3. – 19 –

    2010

  11. [11]

    Clifton, P

    T. Clifton, P. G. Ferreira, A. Padilla, and C. Skordis,Modified gravity and cosmology,Physics Reports513(2012) 1–189

    2012

  12. [12]

    Bojowald, R

    M. Bojowald, R. Goswami, R. Maartens, and P. Singh,A black hole mass threshold from non-singular quantum gravitational collapse,Physical Review Letters95(2005), no. 9 091302, [gr-qc/0503041]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  13. [13]

    Bojowald, J

    M. Bojowald, J. D. Reyes, and R. Tibrewala,Non-singular black holes and degrees of freedom in quantum gravity,Physical Review D80(2009), no. 8 084002, [arXiv:0906.4767]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  14. [14]

    Münch,Effective quantum extended spacetime of polymer schwarzschild black hole interior, Physical Review D104(2021), no

    J. Münch,Effective quantum extended spacetime of polymer schwarzschild black hole interior, Physical Review D104(2021), no. 4 046019, [arXiv:2104.00085]

    arXiv 2021

  15. [15]

    Husain, J

    V. Husain, J. G. Kelly, R. A. Santacruz, and E. Wilson-Ewing,Semi-classical black holes with generalized entropy in loop quantum gravity,Physical Review Letters128(2022), no. 12 121301, [arXiv:2107.08696]

    arXiv 2022

  16. [16]

    Giesel, B.-F

    K. Giesel, B.-F. Li, and P. Singh,Towards a unique loop quantum gravity evolution of black hole interior,Physical Review D104(2021), no. 10 106017, [arXiv:2107.05762]

    arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    Yousaf, H

    M. Yousaf, H. Asad, B. Almutairi, S. Hasan, and A. S. Khan,Fuzzy black hole models inf(G) gravity,Phys. Scr.99(2024) 115270

    2024

  18. [18]

    Donmez, G

    O. Donmez, G. Mustafa, H. Chaudhary, M. Yousaf, A. Bouzenada, A. Ditta, and F. Atamurotov,Relativistic accretion process onto rotating black holes in einstein-euler-heisenberg nonlinear electrodynamic gravity,Phys. the Dark Universe52(2026) 102271

    2026

  19. [19]

    Donmez, S

    O. Donmez, S. G. Ghosh, M. Yousaf, G. Mustafa, and F. Atamurotov,Accretion flow around kerr metric in the infra-red limit of asymptotically safe gravity,arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.14113(2026)

    arXiv 2026

  20. [20]

    Damour and G

    T. Damour and G. Esposito-Farese,Nonperturbative strong field effects in tensor - scalar theories of gravitation,Phys. Rev. Lett.70(1993) 2220–2223

    1993

  21. [21]

    Damour and G

    T. Damour and G. Esposito-Farese,Tensor - scalar gravity and binary pulsar experiments, Phys. Rev. D54(1996) 1474–1491, [gr-qc/9602056]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  22. [22]

    Harada,Neutron stars in scalar tensor theories of gravity and catastrophe theory,Phys

    T. Harada,Neutron stars in scalar tensor theories of gravity and catastrophe theory,Phys. Rev. D57(1998) 4802–4811, [gr-qc/9801049]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  23. [23]

    E. J. Copeland, M. Sami, and S. Tsujikawa,Dynamics of dark energy,International Journal of Modern Physics D15(2006) 1753–1936

    2006

  24. [24]

    Amendola and S

    L. Amendola and S. Tsujikawa,Dark Energy: Theory and Observations. Cambridge University Press, 1, 2015

    2015

  25. [25]

    Kanti, N

    P. Kanti, N. E. Mavromatos, J. Rizos, K. Tamvakis, and E. Winstanley,Dilatonic black holes in higher curvature string gravity,Phys. Rev. D54(1996) 5049–5058, [hep-th/9511071]

    arXiv 1996

  26. [26]

    T. P. Sotiriou and V. Faraoni,Black holes in scalar-tensor gravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.108(2012) 081103, [arXiv:1109.6324]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  27. [27]

    A. I. Janis, E. T. Newman, and J. Winicour,Reality of the Schwarzschild Singularity,Physical Review Letters20(Apr., 1968) 878–880

    1968

  28. [28]

    Stuchlík, A

    Z. Stuchlík, A. Kotrlová, and G. Török,Epicyclic frequency and orbital resonances in accretion disks around black holes,Astronomy & Astrophysics552(2013) A10

    2013

  29. [29]

    Bambi,Testing the nature of black holes,Reviews of Modern Physics89(2017), no

    C. Bambi,Testing the nature of black holes,Reviews of Modern Physics89(2017), no. 2 025001

    2017

  30. [30]

    A. N. Aliev,Epicyclic Frequencies and Resonant Phenomena Near Black Holes: The Current Status, in11th Marcel Grossmann Meeting on General Relativity, pp. 1057–1059, 12, 2006. astro-ph/0612730. – 20 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  31. [31]

    Nishonov, B

    I. Nishonov, B. Rahmatov, S. U. Khan, M. Zahid, J. Rayimbaev, I. Ibragimov, and E. Davletov,Yukawa black holes in modified gravity from thermodynamics to particle collisions, Annals of Physics486(Mar., 2026) 170332

    2026

  32. [32]

    Turakhonov, F

    Z. Turakhonov, F. Atamurotov, A. Ovgun, A. Abdujabbarov, and S. Urinov,Weak gravitational lensing around dyonic ModMax black hole in plasma,Commun. Theor. Phys.76 (2024), no. 11 115401

    2024

  33. [33]

    Turakhonov, H

    Z. Turakhonov, H. Hoshimov, F. Atamurotov, S. G. Ghosh, and A. Abdujabbarov, Observational signatures of strong gravitational lensing in GUP-modified Schwarzschild black holes,Phys. Dark Univ.46(2024) 101716

    2024

  34. [34]

    Ibrokhimov, Z

    T. Ibrokhimov, Z. Turakhonov, F. Atamurotov, A. Abdujabbarov, K. Yerzhanov, G. Bauyrzhan, and A. Abduvokhidov,Testing regular scale-dependent black hole space time using particle dynamics: Shadow and gravitational weak lensing,Phys. Dark Univ.47(2025) 101778

    2025

  35. [35]

    Umarov, F

    D. Umarov, F. Atamurotov, A. Abdujabbarov, and A. Övgün,Spinning particle dynamics around a black hole in Lorentz Gauge theory,Phys. Dark Univ.48(2025) 101945

    2025

  36. [36]

    Umarov, F

    D. Umarov, F. Atamurotov, S. G. Ghosh, A. Abdujabbarov, and G. Mustafa,Dynamics of spinning particles around static black holes in effective quantum gravity,Eur. Phys. J. C85 (2025), no. 7 800

    2025

  37. [37]

    Turimov, A

    B. Turimov, A. Davlataliev, B. Ahmedov, and Z. Stuchlík,Exploring a novel feature of ellis spacetime: Insights into scalar field dynamics,Chin. J. Phys.94(2025) 807–819, [arXiv:2409.14110]

    arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Turimov, A

    B. Turimov, A. Davlataliev, Y. Usmanov, S. Karshiboev, and P. Tadjimuratov,Investigating new aspects of Bocharova–Bronnikov–Melnikov–Bekenstein spacetime: ionized thin accretion disk model,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024), no. 10 1098

    2024

  39. [39]

    Turimov, O

    B. Turimov, O. Rahimov, A. Davlataliev, P. Tadjimuratov, M. Norkobilov, and S. Rahimova, Analysing geodesic motion in Bocharova–Bronnikov–Melnikov–Bekenstein spacetime,Phys. Dark Univ.48(2025) 101855, [arXiv:2502.11210]

    arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Turimov, S

    B. Turimov, S. Usanov, and Y. Khamroev,Particles acceleration by Bocharova–Bronnikov–Melnikov–Bekenstein black hole,Phys. Dark Univ.48(2025) 101876, [arXiv:2502.11185]

    arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Turimov, Y

    B. Turimov, Y. Turaev, B. Ahmedov, and Z. Stuchlík,Circular motion of test particles around wormhole represented by exponential metric,Phys. Dark Univ.35(2022) 100946

    2022

  42. [42]

    Boboqambarova, B

    M. Boboqambarova, B. Turimov, and A. Abdujabbarov,Particle motion around Schwarzschild-MOG black hole,Mod. Phys. Lett. A38(2023), no. 10n11 2350071, [arXiv:2110.05764]. [Erratum: Mod.Phys.Lett.A 38, 2350071 (2023)]

    arXiv 2023

  43. [43]

    Turimov, O

    B. Turimov, O. Rahimov, B. Ahmedov, Z. Stuchlík, and K. Boymurodova,Dynamical motion of matter around a charged black hole,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D30(2021), no. 05 2150037

    2021

  44. [44]

    Turimov, J

    B. Turimov, J. Rayimbaev, A. Abdujabbarov, B. Ahmedov, and Z. Stuchlík,Test particle motion around a black hole in Einstein-Maxwell-scalar theory,Phys. Rev. D102(2020), no. 6 064052, [arXiv:2008.08613]

    arXiv 2020

  45. [45]

    D. J. Gogoi, J. Bora, and A. Övgün,Equatorial periodic orbits and gravitational wave signatures in Euler-Heisenberg black holes surrounded by perfect fluid dark matter, arXiv:2604.11866

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  46. [46]

    Sharma,Markov chain monte carlo methods for parameter estimation in astrophysics, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics55(2017) 213

    S. Sharma,Markov chain monte carlo methods for parameter estimation in astrophysics, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics55(2017) 213

    2017

  47. [47]

    Foreman-Mackey, D

    D. Foreman-Mackey, D. W. Hogg, D. Lang, and J. Goodman,emcee: The mcmc hammer, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific125(2013), no. 925 306. – 21 –

    2013

  48. [48]

    Shabbir, A

    O. Shabbir, A. Shermatov, B. Majeed, T. Zahra, M. Jamil, and J. Rayimbaev,Probing the nature of Einstein nonlinear Maxwell Yukawa black hole through gravitational wave forms from periodic orbits and quasiperiodic oscillations,arXiv:2601.02904

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  49. [49]

    Shermatov, J

    A. Shermatov, J. Rayimbaev, S. Murodov, B. Majeed, I. Ibragimov, B. Shermatov, E. Davletov, and I. Davletov,Circular motion and QPOs near BHs surrounded by dust fields in f(R, T)gravity,Nucl. Phys. B1022(2026) 117231

    2026

  50. [50]

    Zahra, O

    T. Zahra, O. Shabbir, B. Majeed, M. Jamil, J. Rayimbaev, and A. Shermatov,Gravitational wave radiation from periodic orbits and quasi-periodic oscillations in an Einstein nonlinear Maxwell–Yukawa black hole,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025), no. 11 1340, [arXiv:2510.22761]

    arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Shermatov, J

    A. Shermatov, J. Rayimbaev, B. C. Lütfüoğlu, A. Abdujabbarov, S. Sardor, I. Ibragimov, M. Vapayev, and B. Kuyliev,QPOs analyses and circular orbits of charged particles around magnetized black holes in Bertotti–Robinson geometry,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025), no. 9 1017

    2025

  52. [52]

    Turimov, A

    B. Turimov, A. Davlataliev, A. Abdujabbarov, and B. Ahmedov,Influence of scalar field in massive particle motion in JNW spacetime,Phys. Rev. D110(2024), no. 8 084053, [arXiv:2409.06225]

    arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    Shafee, J

    R. Shafee, J. E. McClintock, R. Narayan, S. W. Davis, L. X. Li, and R. A. Remillard, Estimating the spin of stellar-mass black holes from spectral and qpo data,The Astrophysical Journal636(2006), no. 2 L113

    2006

  54. [54]

    Kolos, Z

    M. Kolos, Z. Stuchlik, and A. Tursunov,Epicyclic frequencies and qpos from black hole accretion disks,Physical Review D107(2023), no. 4 044032

    2023

  55. [55]

    Hoshimov, A

    H. Hoshimov, A. Davlataliev, F. Atamurotov, A. Abdujabbarov, and A. Övgün,Particle dynamics and quasi-periodic oscillations in the Dyonic ModMax: Constraint using quasars data,JHEAp45(2025) 306–315

    2025

  56. [56]

    Stuchlík and M

    Z. Stuchlík and M. Kolos,Testing scalar-tensor gravity with epicyclic oscillations in black hole accretion disks,The European Physical Journal C81(2021) 1

    2021

  57. [57]

    Bambi,Testing black hole candidates with electromagnetic radiation,Reviews of Modern Physics90(2018), no

    C. Bambi,Testing black hole candidates with electromagnetic radiation,Reviews of Modern Physics90(2018), no. 2 025002

    2018

  58. [58]

    C. M. Will,The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment,Living Rev. Rel.17 (2014) 4, [arXiv:1403.7377]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  59. [59]

    I. G. Dudko and Y. P. Vyblyi,Scalar field with the source in the form of the stress-energy tensor trace as a dark energy model,Gravitation and Cosmology22(Oct., 2016) 368–373, [arXiv:1610.00949]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  60. [60]

    Levin and G

    J. Levin and G. Perez-GizPhys. Rev. D77(2008) 103005, [arXiv:0802.0459]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  61. [61]

    Glampedakis and D

    K. Glampedakis and D. Kennefick,Zoom and whirl: Eccentric equatorial orbits around spinning black holes and their evolution under gravitational radiation reaction,Phys. Rev. D66 (2002) 044002, [gr-qc/0203086]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  62. [62]

    Babak, H

    S. Babak, H. Fang, J. R. Gair, K. Glampedakis, and S. A. Hughes,’Kludge’ gravitational waveforms for a test-body orbiting a Kerr black hole,Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 024005, [gr-qc/0607007]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 77, 04990 (2008)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  63. [63]

    S. A. Hughes,Gravitational waves from extreme mass ratio inspirals: Challenges in mapping the space-time of massive, compact objects,Class. Quant. Grav.18(2001) 4067–4074, [gr-qc/0008058]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  64. [64]

    K. S. Thorne,Multipole Expansions of Gravitational Radiation,Rev. Mod. Phys.52(1980) 299–339

    1980

  65. [65]

    L. Meng, Z. Xu, and M. Tang,Bound orbits and gravitational wave radiation around the hairy black hole,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025), no. 3 306, [arXiv:2411.01858]. – 22 –

    arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    L. Zhao, M. Tang, and Z. Xu,Periodic orbits and gravitational wave radiation in short hair black hole spacetimes for an extreme mass ratio system,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025), no. 1 36, [arXiv:2411.01979]

    arXiv 2025

  67. [67]

    Davlataliev, B

    A. Davlataliev, B. Turimov, B. Ahmedov, Y. Vyblyi, C. Yuan, and C. Zhou, Spherically-symmetrical vacuum solution in Freund-Nambu scalar-tensor gravity, arXiv:2603.11500. – 23 –

    arXiv