Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 1 minor 49 references

Dynamical implications of the recently detected feature around Quaoar and constraints on the presence of additional satellites

T0 review · 2 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-06-26 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The opaque feature near Quaoar is more consistent with a small satellite than with a dense arc confined at a triangular point.

desk verdict N-body tests make the satellite interpretation more plausible than a confined arc for the Quaoar feature. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.23850 v1 pith:OE32YO4L submitted 2026-06-22 astro-ph.EP

Gustavo Madeira , Leandro Esteves , Bruno E. Morgado , Paulo V. S. Soares , Silvia M. Giuliatti Winter , Othon C. Winter , Bruno S. Chagas This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EP
keywords QuaoarWeywotstellaroccultationsatelliteringconfinementdynamicalstabilitytriangularpointssecularperturbations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Numerical integrations of the Quaoar system show that a 15 km satellite at the reported distance acquires a small forced eccentricity and clears only a narrow resonant zone, leaving the known rings largely unaffected. In contrast, attempts to confine an arc at the triangular equilibrium point of a coorbital body fail to reproduce the observed radial extent once Weywot's secular perturbations are included, unless the confiner is as massive as Weywot itself. The paper therefore concludes that the feature is dynamically more consistent with a satellite and identifies broad stable zones where additional small moons could exist near the rings. Quaoar's triaxial shape alone is shown to drive non-resonant orbital excitation that can inhibit ring particle coagulation.

What carries the argument

N-body integrations that include Quaoar's triaxial figure, Weywot, and test particles or a putative satellite, used to map stability and to track radial and azimuthal excursions under secular perturbations.

What would settle it

A non-detection of any body more massive than a few times 10^18 kg within a few hundred kilometres of the reported feature's orbit during future high-resolution imaging or occultations would falsify the arc-confiner scenario while remaining compatible with the satellite interpretation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

If the reported feature is treated as an arc, azimuthal confinement around the L4 or L5 point of an unseen coorbital satellite is possible for mass ratios up to 0.001, yet Weywot's secular forcing produces radial excursions too large to match the occultation data; only confiners comparable to or exceeding Weywot's mass supply sufficient radial confinement, but such bodies would be detectable by imaging. Treating the feature instead as a satellite yields stable orbits with forced eccentricity of order 0.002 and only local clearing of kilometre-scale test particles.

Load-bearing premise

That any radial confinement of an arc requires a coorbital satellite at least as massive as Weywot, which would be visible to direct imaging.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Additional undetected moons can occupy broad stable regions, including near the Q1R and Q2R rings as possible shepherds.
  • Quaoar's ellipticity alone supplies enough orbital excitation to prevent ring coagulation even without resonant shepherding.
  • A satellite interpretation implies the feature clears only a narrow zone and has negligible long-term effect on the existing rings.
  • Triangular-point arcs are ruled out for this system under the observed radial width once secular perturbations are accounted for.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same secular-perturbation mechanism may limit the lifetime of narrow arcs in other trans-Neptunian systems that host known moons.
  • If small moons near the rings are confirmed, they could provide an alternative or complementary explanation for ring confinement beyond the ellipticity effect.
  • Future occultation campaigns could distinguish the two scenarios by searching for the predicted narrow cleared zone around the feature's orbit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines the dynamical implications of a recently detected opaque feature around Quaoar (interpreted as either a ~15 km satellite or a dense arc at 5600-5900 km) via N-body integrations that incorporate Quaoar's triaxial figure and the known satellite Weywot. For the satellite case, the feature acquires a forced eccentricity of ~0.002, clears a narrow resonant region, and has only minor effects on the Q1R/Q2R rings. For the arc case, azimuthal confinement at triangular points is possible for low mass ratios, but Weywot secular perturbations drive radial excursions that exceed the observed width unless the unseen coorbital mass ratio reaches ~Weywot's value; such a body would likely be detectable by imaging. The authors therefore disfavour the arc interpretation, favor the satellite, identify broad stable zones for additional moons, and note that Quaoar's ellipticity alone can excite non-resonant orbits sufficient to inhibit ring coagulation.

Significance. If the numerical results hold, the work supplies concrete dynamical constraints that tilt the interpretation toward a satellite while highlighting the role of known perturbers and shape-induced excitation in small-body ring systems. The explicit inclusion of triaxial figure and Weywot in the integrations, together with the mapping of stable zones for undetected moons, strengthens the analysis relative to simpler models.

major comments (2)
  1. [Arc confinement analysis (results on radial excursions vs. mass ratio)] The central disfavouring of the arc scenario rests on the claim that radial confinement matching the observed width requires a coorbital mass comparable to or exceeding Weywot's (which would be detectable by direct imaging). No quantitative imaging sensitivity limit, magnitude calculation, or reference to existing observational constraints is supplied to support the detectability threshold; this assumption is load-bearing for rejecting the arc.
  2. [Numerical results on triangular-point confinement] The reported radial-excursion threshold is stated qualitatively in the abstract and results; explicit values (e.g., rms radial width as a function of mass ratio, or comparison to the observed radial extent) from the integrations are needed to assess how sharply the confinement boundary occurs near the Weywot mass ratio.
minor comments (1)
  1. Ensure that the naming and prior literature references for the Q1R and Q2R rings are consistent between abstract and main text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful review and constructive comments, which help clarify the presentation of our results. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Arc confinement analysis (results on radial excursions vs. mass ratio)] The central disfavouring of the arc scenario rests on the claim that radial confinement matching the observed width requires a coorbital mass comparable to or exceeding Weywot's (which would be detectable by direct imaging). No quantitative imaging sensitivity limit, magnitude calculation, or reference to existing observational constraints is supplied to support the detectability threshold; this assumption is load-bearing for rejecting the arc.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from quantitative support for the detectability statement. In the revised version we will add a brief discussion with approximate magnitude estimates for a Weywot-mass coorbital at 5600-5900 km, referencing the HST discovery observations of Weywot and published imaging limits on additional satellites in the Quaoar system. This will make the threshold more explicit while preserving the dynamical conclusion. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Numerical results on triangular-point confinement] The reported radial-excursion threshold is stated qualitatively in the abstract and results; explicit values (e.g., rms radial width as a function of mass ratio, or comparison to the observed radial extent) from the integrations are needed to assess how sharply the confinement boundary occurs near the Weywot mass ratio.

    Authors: We concur that explicit numerical values would improve clarity. We will revise the results section to tabulate rms radial excursions versus mass ratio for the triangular-point integrations and directly compare these widths to the observed radial extent of the occultation feature. This addition will quantify the sharpness of the transition near the Weywot mass ratio. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper derives its main claims—that triangular-point confinement fails to reproduce the observed radial width while a satellite scenario is dynamically consistent—from independent N-body integrations that include Quaoar's triaxial figure, Weywot, and secular perturbations. These results are not obtained by fitting parameters to the target data and then relabeling them as predictions, nor do they rest on self-citations that themselves assume the conclusion. The radial-excursion threshold follows directly from the modeled dynamics rather than from any self-definitional loop or imported uniqueness theorem. The work is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard celestial mechanics assumptions and tests of a hypothetical entity without introducing new fitted parameters or untested physics.

assumptions (3)
  • standard math The gravitational interactions are governed by Newtonian mechanics in the N-body problem
    Basis for all orbital integrations described.
  • domain assumption Quaoar has a triaxial shape that contributes to its gravitational potential
    Explicitly included in the numerical model.
  • domain assumption Weywot is the only known significant perturber besides Quaoar
    Used in the simulations of both scenarios.
invented entities (1)
  • unseen coorbital satellite
    purpose: To provide azimuthal confinement of the arc at the triangular equilibrium point
    Hypothetical body tested for mass ratios up to 0.001 but disfavoured due to required size for radial confinement.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dynamical implications of the recently detected feature around Quaoar and constraints on the presence of additional satellites." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OE32YO4L

@misc{pith2026260623850,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dynamical implications of the recently detected feature around Quaoar and constraints on the presence of additional satellites},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OE32YO4L}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.23850}
}
read the original abstract

A recently reported opaque feature in the Quaoar system, detected during the 25 June 2025 stellar occultation, has been interpreted as either a 15 km-radius satellite or a dense, sharp-edged arc orbiting at about 5600-5900 km. Here, we investigate both scenarios through numerical integrations that include Quaoar, its triaxial shape, and Weywot. If the feature is a satellite, stability maps show that it acquires a forced eccentricity of about 0.002 and has only a minor dynamical effect on the Q1R and Q2R rings. Its main effect is to clear a narrow region around its orbit, associated with the overlap of mean-motion resonances, preventing the long-term survival of kilometre-scale moons within approximately one Quaoar radius of the satellite. If instead the feature is an arc, we test confinement around the triangular equilibrium point of an unseen coorbital satellite. While azimuthal confinement is readily obtained for satellites with satellite-to-primary mass ratios up to 0.001, Weywot's secular perturbation induces large radial excursions in the arc particles, preventing reproduction of the observed radial extent. The required radial confinement is achieved only for confiners comparable to or more massive than Weywot, which would likely be detectable by direct imaging. We therefore disfavour triangular-point confinement as an explanation for a long-lived dense arc and argue that the feature is more dynamically consistent with a satellite. We identify broad stable zones where additional undetected moons could reside, including near the rings as possible shepherd moons. Furthermore, Quaoar's ellipticity alone is sufficient to induce non-resonant orbital excitation capable of preventing ring coagulation, an effect that may be enhanced by small moons near the rings.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.23850 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Mean particle eccentricity as a function of the steady-state velocity dispersion, physical radius, and bulk density of Q1R ring particles. In panel (a), the particle ra￾dius is varied over realistic values for a fixed bulk density of 1000 kg · m−3 , while in panel (b) the bulk density is var￾ied and the particle radius is fixed at 1 m. The colour scale represents the mean eccentricity, with the dotted lines in￾dicat… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Evolution of eccentricity and semi-major axis of satellites (diamond markers) and test particles (black dots) around Quaoar, with each panel corresponding to a different epoch. Orange vertical dashed lines mark the locations of spin–orbit resonances with Quaoar, while green and purple dashed lines indicate first-order mean-motion resonances with the satellite (green diamond) and Weywot (purple diamond), respectively… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Lifetime of all simulated particles and (b) Lyapunov time of the surviving particles, both as functions of the initial semi-major axis and eccentricity. Coloured vertical lines mark the locations of mean-motion resonances, with colours corresponding to those of the associated satellites (diamond markers). Orange vertical lines indicate spin–orbit resonances with Quaoar, with the wider ones highlighting the SORs … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Time evolution of the (a) semi-major axis, (b) eccentricity, and (c) 5:7 SOR resonant angle of a test parti￾cle initially placed at the radial centre of Q2R. The blue curves correspond to the configuration without the puta￾tive satellite, while the black and red curves…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Temporal evolution of the orbital elements and resonant angles of a test particle initially placed at the radial centre of Q1R. Blue curves correspond to the configuration with only Weywot in the system, black curves to the configuration including a putative satellite …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Frequency maps of test particles in the vicinity of one of the triangular equilibrium points of a satellite placed at 5676.5 km from Quaoar, with the satellite mass indicated at the top of each panel. We consider masses ranging from 10−6 to 10−3 MQ, corresponding to sa…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Initial semi-major axis and physical radius of a hypothetical additional moon that survives over 104 TQ without accreting ring particles, with the colour scale indicating the maximum eccentricity induced by the moon on the ring particles. We consider the satellite asso…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Lyapunov Characteristic Exponents for smooth dynamical systems and for hamiltonian systems; a method for computing all of them

    Benettin, G., Galgani, L., Giorgilli, A., & Strelcyn, J.-M. 1980, Meccanica, 15, 9, doi: 10.1007/BF02128236

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02128236 1980

  2. [2]

    L., Sicardy, B., et al

    Braga-Ribas, F., Pereira, C., & et al. 2026, ApJL, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae4751

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae4751 2026

  3. [3]

    2014, , 508, 72, 10.1038/nature13155

    Braga-Ribas, F., Sicardy, B., Ortiz, J. L., et al. 2014, Nature, 508, 72, doi: 10.1038/nature13155

    work page doi:10.1038/nature13155 2014

  4. [4]

    1984 Structure, stability and evolution of Saturn’s rings

    Bridges, F. G., Hatzes, A., & Lin, D. N. C. 1984, Nature, 309, 333, doi: 10.1038/309333a0

    work page doi:10.1038/309333a0 1984

  5. [5]

    Charnoz,et al., Accretion of Saturn’s mid-sized moons during the viscous spreading of young massive rings: Solving the paradox of silicate-poor rings versus silicate-rich moons

    Charnoz, S., Crida, A., Castillo-Rogez, J. C., et al. 2011, Icarus, 216, 535, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2011.09.017

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2011.09.017 2011

  6. [6]

    C., & Brown, M

    Fraser, W. C., & Brown, M. E. 2010, ApJ, 714, 1547, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/714/2/1547

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/714/2/1547 2010

  7. [7]

    G., Elliot, J

    French, R. G., Elliot, J. L., & Levine, S. E. 1986, Icarus, 67, 134, doi: 10.1016/0019-1035(86)90181-8 Giuliatti Winter, S. M., Madeira, G., Ribeiro, T., et al. 2023, A&A, 679, A62, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202345864

    work page doi:10.1016/0019-1035(86)90181-8 1986

  8. [8]

    , keywords =

    Goldreich, P., & Tremaine, S. 1982, ARA&A, 20, 249, doi: 10.1146/annurev.aa.20.090182.001341

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.20.090182.001341 1982

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    Goldreich, P., & Tremaine, S. D. 1978, Icarus, 34, 227, doi: 10.1016/0019-1035(78)90164-1

    1978 doi

  2. [10]

    P., Bridges, F

    Hatzes, A. P., Bridges, F. G., & Lin, D. N. C. 1988, MNRAS, 231, 1091, doi: 10.1093/mnras/231.4.1091

    1988 doi

  3. [11]

    M., Murray, C

    Hedman, M. M., Murray, C. D., Cooper, N. J., et al. 2009, Icarus, 199, 378, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2008.11.001

    2009 doi

  4. [12]

    2015, ApJ, 799, 40, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/799/1/40

    Hyodo, R., Ohtsuki, K., & Takeda, T. 2015, ApJ, 799, 40, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/799/1/40

    2015 doi

  5. [13]

    G., Marton, G., et al

    Kiss, C., M¨ uller, T. G., Marton, G., et al. 2024, A&A, 684, A50, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348054

    2024 doi

  6. [14]

    L., & Shevchenko, I

    Lages, J., Shepelyansky, D. L., & Shevchenko, I. I. 2017, AJ, 153, 272, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa7203

    2017 doi

  7. [15]

    Lissauer, J. J. 1985, Nature, 318, 544, doi: 10.1038/318544a0

    1985 doi

  8. [16]

    Madeira, G., Esteves, L., & Pinheiro, T. F. L. L. 2025a, European Physical Journal Special Topics, doi: 10.1140/epjs/s11734-025-01985-2

    doi

  9. [17]

    Madeira, G., Esteves, L., Pinheiro, T. F. L. L., et al. 2025b, Planet. Space Sci., 266, 106168, doi: 10.1016/j.pss.2025.106168

    2025 doi

  10. [18]

    Madeira, G., & Giuliatti Winter, S. M. 2020, European Physical Journal Special Topics, 229, 1527, doi: 10.1140/epjst/e2020-900129-5

    2020 doi

  11. [19]

    Madeira, G., & Giuliatti Winter, S. M. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 297, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac944

    2022 doi

  12. [20]

    Winter, O. C. 2022, MNRAS, 510, 1450, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3552

    2022 doi

  13. [21]

    E., Pereira, C

    Madeira, G., Morgado, B. E., Pereira, C. L., et al. 2025c, ApJ, 994, 268, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae169e

    doi

  14. [22]

    2024, Master’s thesis, Universidade Tecnol´ ogica Federal do Paran´ a

    Margoti, G., et al. 2024, Master’s thesis, Universidade Tecnol´ ogica Federal do Paran´ a

    2024

  15. [23]

    E., Sicardy, B., Braga-Ribas, F., et al

    Morgado, B. E., Sicardy, B., Braga-Ribas, F., et al. 2021, A&A, 652, A141, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141543

    2021 doi

  16. [24]

    E., Sicardy, B., Braga-Ribas, F., et al

    Morgado, B. E., Sicardy, B., Braga-Ribas, F., et al. 2023, Nature, 614, 239, doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05629-6

    2023 doi

  17. [25]

    D., Persson, S

    Nicholson, P. D., Persson, S. E., Matthews, K., Goldreich, P., & Neugebauer, G. 1978, AJ, 83, 1240, doi: 10.1086/112318

    1978 doi

  18. [26]

    M., Nesvorn´ y, D., & Thirouin, A

    Noll, K., Grundy, W. M., Nesvorn´ y, D., & Thirouin, A. 2020, in The Trans-Neptunian Solar System, ed. D. Prialnik, M. A. Barucci, & L. Young, 201–224, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-816490-7.00009-6

    2020 doi

  19. [27]

    V., Proudfoot, B

    Nolthenius, R., Bender, K., Cotton, D. V., Proudfoot, B. C. N., & Irwin, J. 2025, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 9, 226, doi: 10.3847/2515-5172/adfeda

    2025 doi

  20. [28]

    L., Santos-Sanz, P., Sicardy, B., et al

    Ortiz, J. L., Santos-Sanz, P., Sicardy, B., et al. 2017, Nature, 550, 219, doi: 10.1038/nature24051

    2017 doi

  21. [29]

    L., Sicardy, B., Morgado, B

    Pereira, C. L., Sicardy, B., Morgado, B. E., et al. 2023, A&A, 673, L4, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346365

    2023 doi

  22. [30]

    L., Braga-Ribas, F., Sicardy, B., et al

    Pereira, C. L., Braga-Ribas, F., Sicardy, B., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.12388. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.12388

    2025

  23. [31]

    2025a, PSJ, 6, 285, doi: 10.3847/PSJ/ae18da

    Proudfoot, B., Grundy, W., Ragozzine, D., & Fern´ andez-Valenzuela, E. 2025a, PSJ, 6, 285, doi: 10.3847/PSJ/ae18da

    doi

  24. [32]

    J., Arimatsu, K., et al

    Proudfoot, B., Holler, B. J., Arimatsu, K., et al. 2025b, PSJ, 6, 146, doi: 10.3847/PSJ/addd02

    doi

  25. [33]

    J., et al

    Proudfoot, B., Nolthenius, R., Holler, B. J., et al. 2025c, ApJL, 993, L38, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae1585

    doi

  26. [34]

    Rein, H., & Liu, S. F. 2012, A&A, 537, A128, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118085

    2012 doi

  27. [35]

    Rein, H., & Spiegel, D. S. 2015, MNRAS, 446, 1424, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2164

    2015 doi

  28. [36]

    2004, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 88, 397, doi: 10.1023/B:CELE.0000023420.80881.67 17

    Renner, S., & Sicardy, B. 2004, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 88, 397, doi: 10.1023/B:CELE.0000023420.80881.67 17

    2004 doi

  29. [37]

    2014, A&A, 563, A133, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321910

    Renner, S., Sicardy, B., Souami, D., Carry, B., & Dumas, C. 2014, A&A, 563, A133, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321910

    2014 doi

  30. [38]

    Winter, S. M. 2023, MNRAS, 525, 44, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2362

    2023 doi

  31. [39]

    C., Mour˜ ao, D., Boldrin, L

    Ribeiro, T., Winter, O. C., Mour˜ ao, D., Boldrin, L. A. G., & Carvalho, J. P. S. 2021, MNRAS, 506, 3068, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1880 Rodr´ ıguez, A., Morgado, B. E., & Callegari, Jr., N. 2023, MNRAS, 525, 3376, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2413

    2021 doi

  32. [40]

    2010, Icarus, 209, 771, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2010.05.030

    Salmon, J., Charnoz, S., Crida, A., & Brahic, A. 2010, Icarus, 209, 771, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2010.05.030

    2010 doi

  33. [41]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.06975, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.06975

    Salo, H., & Sicardy, B. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.06975, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.06975

    2026 doi

  34. [42]

    Scheeres, D. J. 1994, Icarus, 110, 225, doi: 10.1006/icar.1994.1118

    1994 doi

  35. [43]

    H., & Stewart, G

    Shu, F. H., & Stewart, G. R. 1985, Icarus, 62, 360, doi: 10.1016/0019-1035(85)90181-2

    1985 doi

  36. [44]

    2025, A&A, 704, A23, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202556950

    Souami, D. 2025, A&A, 704, A23, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202556950

    2025 doi

  37. [45]

    A., & Lewis, M

    Sickafoose, A. A., & Lewis, M. C. 2024, PSJ, 5, 32, doi: 10.3847/PSJ/ad151c

    2024 doi

  38. [46]

    1964, ApJ, 139, 1217, doi: 10.1086/147861

    Toomre, A. 1964, ApJ, 139, 1217, doi: 10.1086/147861

    1964 doi

  39. [47]

    C., Borderes-Motta, G., & Ribeiro, T

    Winter, O. C., Borderes-Motta, G., & Ribeiro, T. 2019, MNRAS, 484, 3765, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz246

    2019 doi

  40. [48]

    1980, AJ, 85, 1122, doi: 10.1086/112778

    Wisdom, J. 1980, AJ, 85, 1122, doi: 10.1086/112778

    1980 doi

  41. [49]

    B., Swinney, H

    Wolf, A., Swift, J. B., Swinney, H. L., & Vastano, J. A. 1985, Physica D Nonlinear Phenomena, 16, 285, doi: 10.1016/0167-2789(85)90011-9

    1985 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed June 26, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.