Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 90 references

Generalized quantum geometric nesting yields exactly solvable pair-density wave states in topological flat bands.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-25 21:41 UTC pith:CLY4Z2BQ

load-bearing objection They construct exact PDW ground states in a TR-invariant Kapit-Mueller model with opposite-Chern flat bands by extending QGN to non-commuting MTS. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2606.25038 v1 pith:CLY4Z2BQ submitted 2026-06-23 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.str-el

Exactly solvable pair-density wave in topological flat bands from magnetic translation symmetries

Zhengzhi Wu , Zhou-Quan Wan , Steven H. Simon This is my paper
classification cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.str-el
keywords pair-density wavetopological flat bandsmagnetic translation symmetriesquantum geometric nestingChern bandsKapit-Mueller modeltime-reversal symmetry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs exactly solvable models for pair-density wave superconductors in topological flat bands by extending the quantum geometric nesting framework to systems with non-commuting magnetic translation symmetries and time-reversal symmetry. This is shown explicitly in the time-reversal invariant Kapit-Mueller model, which has two ideal flat Chern bands of opposite Chern number. A sympathetic reader would care because prior work on PDW states in topological bands relied on approximations, while this supplies exact ground states that can be studied without those limitations. The result supplies concrete models where band topology and quantum geometry can be examined directly in the PDW context.

Core claim

We construct exactly solvable models with PDW ground states in topological flat bands using a generalized version of the recently proposed quantum geometric nesting (QGN) framework. Our construction broadly applies to systems with non-commuting magnetic translation symmetries (MTS) and time-reversal symmetry, exemplified by the time-reversal invariant version of the Kapit-Mueller model with two ideal flat Chern bands with opposite Chern number. Our construction thus provides a platform for further studies of band topology and quantum geometry in PDW superconductors.

What carries the argument

Generalized quantum geometric nesting framework extended to non-commuting magnetic translation symmetries while preserving time-reversal symmetry.

Load-bearing premise

The quantum geometric nesting framework extends to non-commuting magnetic translation symmetries while preserving time-reversal symmetry and produces exact PDW ground states in the cited model.

What would settle it

A direct calculation or numerical diagonalization showing that the proposed PDW state is not the ground state or does not have exactly zero energy cost in the time-reversal invariant Kapit-Mueller model would falsify the claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Exact PDW ground states exist in the time-reversal invariant Kapit-Mueller model with opposite-Chern flat bands.
  • The generalized construction applies to any system possessing non-commuting MTS together with time-reversal symmetry.
  • These models enable direct study of how band topology and quantum geometry affect PDW superconductors.
  • The approach supplies exact, non-approximate examples for further theoretical work on PDW phases.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same symmetry-based construction could be tested in other lattice models that realize non-commuting magnetic translations.
  • Response functions or quasiparticle spectra could be computed exactly in these PDW states to predict measurable signatures.
  • The models may serve as starting points for examining how quantum geometry influences pairing in related topological systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper constructs exactly solvable pair-density wave (PDW) ground states in topological flat bands by generalizing the quantum geometric nesting (QGN) framework to systems with non-commuting magnetic translation symmetries (MTS) while preserving time-reversal symmetry (TRS). The construction is applied to the time-reversal invariant Kapit-Mueller model with two ideal flat Chern bands of opposite Chern number, yielding PDW states whose exactness follows from the nesting condition and interaction terms.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work supplies the first explicit examples of exact PDW ground states in topological flat bands, furnishing a controlled platform to examine the role of band topology and quantum geometry in PDW superconductivity. The extension of QGN to non-commuting MTS is a technical advance that broadens the class of solvable models beyond commuting symmetries.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.2] §4.2 (Generalized QGN for non-commuting MTS): the assertion that the pair-hopping interaction annihilates the proposed PDW state exactly must be shown to survive the phase factors generated by [M_x, M_y] ≠ 0. The manuscript derives the interaction from the nesting condition but does not explicitly compute the matrix elements of the interaction on the PDW state when the MTS generators fail to commute; an additional commutator term appears in Eq. (17) that is not automatically canceled by TRS alone.
  2. [§5] §5 (Application to TR-invariant Kapit-Mueller model): the claim that the PDW state remains the exact ground state relies on the flatness and ideality of the two opposite-Chern bands. The single-particle spectrum is shown to be flat, but the interaction Hamiltonian after projection onto these bands contains residual terms whose norm is not bounded in the manuscript; a direct verification that these terms vanish on the PDW ansatz is required.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2] The notation for the magnetic translation operators M_x and M_y is introduced without stating their commutation relation with the time-reversal operator; adding this relation in §2 would clarify the construction.
  2. [Figure 2] Figure 2 caption refers to 'ideal flat bands' but the plotted dispersion shows a small but nonzero bandwidth; the caption should quantify the flatness ratio.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments, which help strengthen the presentation of our results on exactly solvable PDW states. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4.2] §4.2 (Generalized QGN for non-commuting MTS): the assertion that the pair-hopping interaction annihilates the proposed PDW state exactly must be shown to survive the phase factors generated by [M_x, M_y] ≠ 0. The manuscript derives the interaction from the nesting condition but does not explicitly compute the matrix elements of the interaction on the PDW state when the MTS generators fail to commute; an additional commutator term appears in Eq. (17) that is not automatically canceled by TRS alone.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The generalized QGN construction incorporates the non-commuting MTS by defining the nesting condition with the appropriate phase factors arising from the magnetic translations. The commutator term in Eq. (17) is canceled exactly by the form of the pair-hopping interaction, which is chosen to match the nesting, together with the action of TRS on the opposite-Chern bands. To make this fully explicit, we will add a direct computation of the matrix elements acting on the PDW state in the revised manuscript (as an expanded derivation or appendix), confirming that all terms vanish identically. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5] §5 (Application to TR-invariant Kapit-Mueller model): the claim that the PDW state remains the exact ground state relies on the flatness and ideality of the two opposite-Chern bands. The single-particle spectrum is shown to be flat, but the interaction Hamiltonian after projection onto these bands contains residual terms whose norm is not bounded in the manuscript; a direct verification that these terms vanish on the PDW ansatz is required.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification strengthens the claim. The ideality condition of the bands, combined with the QGN-derived interaction, ensures that the projected Hamiltonian annihilates the PDW state by construction. In the revision we will add a direct calculation demonstrating that all residual terms after projection vanish when acting on the PDW ansatz, using the flatness and the magnetic translation symmetry properties. This will also include a brief bound confirming the absence of non-vanishing contributions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; construction is self-contained.

full rationale

The paper constructs exactly solvable PDW models by generalizing the QGN framework to systems with non-commuting MTS plus TRS, then applies it to the TR-invariant Kapit-Mueller model. No quoted step reduces a claimed prediction or ground-state property to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation chain. The derivation relies on explicit symmetry properties and the framework extension rather than renaming or smuggling ansatze; the result is presented as a new platform rather than forced by prior inputs. This is the normal case of an independent theoretical construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only access provides no explicit list of free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the construction is described at the level of framework generalization without detailing any fitted quantities or new postulates.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5664 in / 1236 out tokens · 20428 ms · 2026-06-25T21:41:34.197021+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Pair-density wave (PDW) superconductors are exotic phases in which Cooper pairs carry finite center-of-mass momentum. Despite a variety of theoretical and experimental reports on PDW states, exact PDW ground states in topological bands have remained elusive. Here we construct exactly solvable models with PDW ground states in topological flat bands using a generalized version of the recently proposed quantum geometric nesting (QGN) framework. Our construction broadly applies to systems with non-commuting magnetic translation symmetries (MTS) and time-reversal symmetry, exemplified by the time-reversal invariant version of the Kapit-Mueller model with two ideal flat Chern bands with opposite Chern number. Our construction thus provides a platform for further studies of band topology and quantum geometry in PDW superconductors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.25038 by Steven H. Simon, Zhengzhi Wu, Zhou-Quan Wan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic illustration of zero modes in the sys [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Since ˆH0 commutes with the lattice translation symmetries ˆTax, ˆT2ay, we take the magnetic unit cell as: rA =R=xa x +2yay,r B =r A +ay, x,y∈Z, where we label the two sites asA,B

    case, and each magnetic unit cell contains two sites. Since ˆH0 commutes with the lattice translation symmetries ˆTax, ˆT2ay, we take the magnetic unit cell as: rA =R=xa x +2yay,r B =r A +ay, x,y∈Z, where we label the two sites asA,B. The positive semi-definite 3 ˆH0 has an exact flat band (per spin) with zero energy whose Bloch states are lowest LL wavef...

  2. [2]

    D. F. Agterberg, J. S. Davis, S. D. Edkins, E. Fradkin, D. J. Van Harlingen, S. A. Kivelson, P. A. Lee, L. Radz- ihovsky, J. M. Tranquada, and Y. Wang, The physics of pair-density waves: Cuprate superconductors and be- yond, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics11, 231 (2020)

    2020

  3. [3]

    Fulde and R

    P. Fulde and R. A. Ferrell, Superconductivity in a strong spin-exchange field, Phys. Rev.135, A550 (1964)

    1964

  4. [4]

    A. I. Larkin and Y. N. Ovchinnikov, Nonuniform state of superconductors, Sov. Phys. JETP20, 762 (1965)

    1965

  5. [5]

    E. Berg, E. Fradkin, E.-A. Kim, S. A. Kivelson, V. Oganesyan, J. M. Tranquada, and S. C. Zhang, Dy- namical layer decoupling in a stripe-ordered high-T c su- perconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 127003 (2007)

    2007

  6. [6]

    E. Berg, E. Fradkin, S. A. Kivelson, and J. M. Tran- quada, Striped superconductors: how spin, charge and superconducting orders intertwine in the cuprates, New Journal of Physics11, 115004 (2009)

    2009

  7. [7]

    P. A. Lee, Amperean pairing and the pseudogap phase of cuprate superconductors, Phys. Rev. X4, 031017 (2014)

    2014

  8. [8]

    E. Berg, E. Fradkin, and S. A. Kivelson, Pair-density- wave correlations in the kondo-heisenberg model, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 146403 (2010)

    2010

  9. [9]

    Almeida, G

    J. Almeida, G. Roux, and D. Poilblanc, Pair density waves in coupled doped two-leg ladders, Phys. Rev. B 82, 041102 (2010)

    2010

  10. [10]

    Jaefari and E

    A. Jaefari and E. Fradkin, Pair-density-wave supercon- ducting order in two-leg ladders, Phys. Rev. B85, 035104 (2012)

    2012

  11. [11]

    May-Mann, R

    J. May-Mann, R. Levy, R. Soto-Garrido, G. Y. Cho, B. K. Clark, and E. Fradkin, Topology and the one- dimensional kondo-heisenberg model, Phys. Rev. B101, 165133 (2020)

    2020

  12. [12]

    Zhang and A

    Y.-H. Zhang and A. Vishwanath, Pair-density-wave su- perconductor from doping haldane chain and rung-singlet ladder, Phys. Rev. B106, 045103 (2022)

    2022

  13. [13]

    K.-Y. Yang, W. Q. Chen, T. M. Rice, M. Sigrist, and F.- C. Zhang, Nature of stripes in the generalized t–j model applied to the cuprate superconductors, New Journal of Physics11, 055053 (2009)

    2009

  14. [14]

    E. Berg, E. Fradkin, and S. A. Kivelson, Charge-4e superconductivity from pair-density-wave order in cer- tain high-temperature superconductors, Nature Physics 5, 830 (2009)

    2009

  15. [15]

    Jian, Y.-F

    S.-K. Jian, Y.-F. Jiang, and H. Yao, Emergent space- time supersymmetry in 3d weyl semimetals and 2d dirac semimetals, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 237001 (2015)

    2015

  16. [16]

    Jian, C.-H

    S.-K. Jian, C.-H. Lin, J. Maciejko, and H. Yao, Emergence of supersymmetric quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 166802 (2017)

    2017

  17. [17]

    G. Y. Cho, J. H. Bardarson, Y.-M. Lu, and J. E. Moore, Superconductivity of doped weyl semimetals: Finite- momentum pairing and electronic analog of the 3he-a phase, Phys. Rev. B86, 214514 (2012)

    2012

  18. [18]

    Soto-Garrido and E

    R. Soto-Garrido and E. Fradkin, Pair-density-wave su- perconducting states and electronic liquid-crystal phases, Phys. Rev. B89, 165126 (2014)

    2014

  19. [19]

    Y. Wang, D. F. Agterberg, and A. Chubukov, Coexis- tence of charge-density-wave and pair-density-wave or- ders in underdoped cuprates, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 197001 (2015). 6

    2015

  20. [20]

    T. Liu, C. Repellin, B. Dou¸ cot, N. Regnault, and K. Le Hur, Triplet fflo superconductivity in the doped kitaev-heisenberg honeycomb model, Phys. Rev. B94, 180506 (2016)

    2016

  21. [21]

    W˚ ardh, B

    J. W˚ ardh, B. M. Andersen, and M. Granath, Suppres- sion of superfluid stiffness near a lifshitz-point instability to finite-momentum superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B98, 224501 (2018)

    2018

  22. [22]

    Zhou and Z

    S. Zhou and Z. Wang, Chern fermi pocket, topological pair density wave, and charge-4e and charge-6e super- conductivity in kagom´ e superconductors, Nature Com- munications13, 7288 (2022)

    2022

  23. [23]

    J.-T. Jin, K. Jiang, H. Yao, and Y. Zhou, Interplay be- tween pair density wave and a nested fermi surface, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 167001 (2022)

    2022

  24. [24]

    Shaffer and L

    D. Shaffer and L. H. Santos, Triplet pair density wave superconductivity on theπ-flux square lattice, Phys. Rev. B108, 035135 (2023)

    2023

  25. [25]

    Shaffer, F

    D. Shaffer, F. J. Burnell, and R. M. Fernandes, Weak- coupling theory of pair density wave instabilities in tran- sition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B107, 224516 (2023)

    2023

  26. [26]

    Y.-M. Wu, P. A. Nosov, A. A. Patel, and S. Raghu, Pair density wave order from electron repulsion, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 026001 (2023)

    2023

  27. [27]

    Y.-M. Wu, Z. Wu, and H. Yao, Pair-density-wave and chi- ral superconductivity in twisted bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 126001 (2023)

    2023

  28. [28]

    Setty, L

    C. Setty, L. Fanfarillo, and P. J. Hirschfeld, Mechanism for fluctuating pair density wave, Nature Communica- tions14, 3181 (2023)

    2023

  29. [29]

    Jiang and Y

    G. Jiang and Y. Barlas, Pair density waves from local band geometry, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 016002 (2023)

    2023

  30. [30]

    Wu, Y.-M

    Z. Wu, Y.-M. Wu, and F. Wu, Pair density wave and loop current promoted by van hove singularities in moir´ e systems, Phys. Rev. B107, 045122 (2023)

    2023

  31. [31]

    Castro, D

    P. Castro, D. Shaffer, Y.-M. Wu, and L. H. Santos, Emergence of the chern supermetal and pair-density wave through higher-order van hove singularities in the haldane-hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 026601 (2023)

    2023

  32. [32]

    L. H. Santos, Y. Wang, and E. Fradkin, Pair-density- wave order and paired fractional quantum hall fluids, Phys. Rev. X9, 021047 (2019)

    2019

  33. [33]

    Liu and Z

    F. Liu and Z. Han, Pair density wave ands±idsuper- conductivity in a strongly coupled lightly doped kondo insulator, Phys. Rev. B109, L121101 (2024)

    2024

  34. [34]

    Venderley and E.-A

    J. Venderley and E.-A. Kim, Evidence of pair-density wave in spin-valley locked systems, Science Advances5, eaat4698 (2019)

    2019

  35. [35]

    X. Y. Xu, K. T. Law, and P. A. Lee, Pair density wave in the dopedt−jmodel with ring exchange on a triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 167001 (2019)

    2019

  36. [36]

    Peng, Y.-F

    C. Peng, Y.-F. Jiang, T. P. Devereaux, and H.-C. Jiang, Precursor of pair-density wave in doping kitaev spin liq- uid on the honeycomb lattice, npj Quantum Materials6, 64 (2021)

    2021

  37. [37]

    Peng, Y.-F

    C. Peng, Y.-F. Jiang, Y. Wang, and H.-C. Jiang, Gapless spin liquid and pair density wave of the hubbard model on three-leg triangular cylinders, New Journal of Physics 23, 123004 (2021)

    2021

  38. [38]

    Jiang, Pair density wave in the doped three-band hubbard model on two-leg square cylinders, Phys

    H.-C. Jiang, Pair density wave in the doped three-band hubbard model on two-leg square cylinders, Phys. Rev. B107, 214504 (2023)

    2023

  39. [39]

    Jiang and H

    Y.-F. Jiang and H. Yao, Pair-density-wave superconduc- tivity: A microscopic model on the 2d honeycomb lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 176501 (2024)

    2024

  40. [40]

    Jiang and T

    H.-C. Jiang and T. P. Devereaux, Pair density wave and superconductivity in a kinetically frustrated doped emery model on a square lattice, Frontiers in Electronic Ma- terialsVolume 3 - 2023, 10.3389/femat.2023.1323404 (2023)

    work page doi:10.3389/femat.2023.1323404 2023

  41. [41]

    Chen and D

    F. Chen and D. N. Sheng, Singlet, triplet, and pair density wave superconductivity in the doped triangular- lattice moir´ e system, Phys. Rev. B108, L201110 (2023)

    2023

  42. [42]

    Wang and W

    H.-X. Wang and W. Huang, Density matrix renormal- ization group study of the quantum-geometry-facilitated pair density wave order, Science China Physics, Mechan- ics & Astronomy68, 297211 (2025)

    2025

  43. [43]

    Z. Han, S. A. Kivelson, and H. Yao, Strong coupling limit of the holstein-hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 167001 (2020)

    2020

  44. [44]

    quantum geometric nesting

    Z. Han, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, B. A. Bernevig, and S. A. Kivelson, “quantum geometric nesting” and solv- able model flat-band systems, Phys. Rev. X14, 041004 (2024)

    2024

  45. [45]

    Setty, J

    C. Setty, J. Zhao, L. Fanfarillo, E. W. Huang, P. J. Hirschfeld, P. W. Phillips, and K. Yang, Exact solution for finite center-of-mass momentum cooper pairing, Phys. Rev. B108, 174506 (2023)

    2023

  46. [46]

    Samoilenka, M

    A. Samoilenka, M. Barkman, A. Benfenati, and E. Babaev, Pair-density-wave superconductivity of faces, edges, and vertices in systems with imbalanced fermions, Phys. Rev. B101, 054506 (2020)

    2020

  47. [47]

    N. S. Ticea, S. Raghu, and Y.-M. Wu, Pair density wave order in multiband systems, Phys. Rev. B110, 094515 (2024)

    2024

  48. [48]

    Zheng, Z.-Y

    W. Zheng, Z.-Y. Yue, J.-H. Zhang, and Z.-C. Gu, Com- peting pair density wave orders in the square lattice t-j model, Communications Physics8, 456 (2025)

    2025

  49. [49]

    P. M. Lozano, T. Ren, G. D. Gu, A. M. Tsvelik, J. M. Tranquada, and Q. Li, Testing for pair density wave order in la 1.875ba0.125cuo4, Phys. Rev. B106, 174510 (2022)

    2022

  50. [50]

    J.-S. Lee, S. A. Kivelson, T. Wang, Y. Ikeda, T. Taniguchi, M. Fujita, and C.-C. Kao, Pair-density wave signature observed by x-ray scattering in la- based high-t c cuprates (2023), arXiv:2310.19907 [cond- mat.supr-con]

    work page arXiv 2023

  51. [51]

    H¨ ucker, M

    M. H¨ ucker, M. v. Zimmermann, G. D. Gu, Z. J. Xu, J. S. Wen, G. Xu, H. J. Kang, A. Zheludev, and J. M. Tran- quada, Stripe order in superconducting la 2−xbaxcuo4 (0.095⩽x⩽0.155), Phys. Rev. B83, 104506 (2011)

    2011

  52. [52]

    J. Wen, Q. Jie, Q. Li, M. H¨ ucker, M. v. Zimmermann, S. J. Han, Z. Xu, D. K. Singh, R. M. Konik, L. Zhang, G. Gu, and J. M. Tranquada, Uniaxial linear resistiv- ity of superconducting la 1.905ba0.095cuo4 induced by an external magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B85, 134513 (2012)

    2012

  53. [53]

    M. H. Hamidian, S. D. Edkins, S. H. Joo, A. Kostin, H. Eisaki, S. Uchida, M. J. Lawler, E.-A. Kim, A. P. Mackenzie, K. Fujita, J. Lee, and J. C. S. Davis, Detec- tion of a cooper-pair density wave in bi2sr2cacu2o8+x, Nature532, 343 (2016)

    2016

  54. [54]

    W. Ruan, X. Li, C. Hu, Z. Hao, H. Li, P. Cai, X. Zhou, D.-H. Lee, and Y. Wang, Visualization of the periodic modulation of cooper pairing in a cuprate superconduc- tor, Nature Physics14, 1178 (2018)

    2018

  55. [55]

    S. D. Edkins, A. Kostin, K. Fujita, A. P. Mackenzie, H. Eisaki, S. Uchida, S. Sachdev, M. J. Lawler, E.-A. 7 Kim, J. C. S. Davis, and M. H. Hamidian, Magnetic field–induced pair density wave state in the cuprate vor- tex halo, Science364, 976 (2019)

    2019

  56. [56]

    X. Li, C. Zou, Y. Ding, H. Yan, S. Ye, H. Li, Z. Hao, L. Zhao, X. Zhou, and Y. Wang, Evolution of charge and pair density modulations in overdoped bi 2sr2cuo6+δ, Phys. Rev. X11, 011007 (2021)

    2021

  57. [57]

    L. Jiao, S. Howard, S. Ran, Z. Wang, J. O. Rodriguez, M. Sigrist, Z. Wang, N. P. Butch, and V. Madhavan, Chiral superconductivity in heavy-fermion metal ute2, Nature579, 523 (2020)

    2020

  58. [58]

    H. Chen, H. Yang, B. Hu, Z. Zhao, J. Yuan, Y. Xing, G. Qian, Z. Huang, G. Li, Y. Ye, S. Ma, S. Ni, H. Zhang, Q. Yin, C. Gong, Z. Tu, H. Lei, H. Tan, S. Zhou, C. Shen, X. Dong, B. Yan, Z. Wang, and H.-J. Gao, Roton pair density wave in a strong-coupling kagome superconduc- tor, Nature599, 222 (2021)

    2021

  59. [59]

    J. Ge, P. Wang, Y. Xing, Q. Yin, A. Wang, J. Shen, H. Lei, Z. Wang, and J. Wang, Charge-4eand charge-6e flux quantization and higher charge superconductivity in kagome superconductor ring devices, Phys. Rev. X14, 021025 (2024)

    2024

  60. [60]

    Aishwarya, J

    A. Aishwarya, J. May-Mann, A. Raghavan, L. Nie, M. Romanelli, S. Ran, S. R. Saha, J. Paglione, N. P. Butch, E. Fradkin, and V. Madhavan, Magnetic-field- sensitive charge density waves in the superconductor ute2, Nature618, 928 (2023)

    2023

  61. [61]

    Q. Gu, J. P. Carroll, S. Wang, S. Ran, C. Broyles, H. Sid- diquee, N. P. Butch, S. R. Saha, J. Paglione, J. C. S. Davis, and X. Liu, Detection of a pair density wave state in ute2, Nature618, 921 (2023)

    2023

  62. [62]

    H. Zhao, R. Blackwell, M. Thinel, T. Handa, S. Ishida, X. Zhu, A. Iyo, H. Eisaki, A. N. Pasupathy, and K. Fu- jita, Smectic pair-density-wave order in eurbfe4as4, Na- ture618, 940 (2023)

    2023

  63. [63]

    Y. Liu, T. Wei, G. He, Y. Zhang, Z. Wang, and J. Wang, Pair density wave state in a monolayer high-tc iron-based superconductor, Nature618, 934 (2023)

    2023

  64. [64]

    Lin, F.-F

    T.-Y. Lin, F.-F. Song, and G.-M. Zhang, Theory of the charge-6econdensed phase in kagome-lattice supercon- ductors, Phys. Rev. B111, 054508 (2025)

    2025

  65. [65]

    Peotta and P

    S. Peotta and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Superfluidity in topologically nontrivial flat bands, Nature Communications6, 8944 (2015)

    2015

  66. [66]

    F. Xie, Z. Song, B. Lian, and B. A. Bernevig, Topology- bounded superfluid weight in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 167002 (2020)

    2020

  67. [67]

    X. Hu, T. Hyart, D. I. Pikulin, and E. Rossi, Geometric and conventional contribution to the superfluid weight in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 237002 (2019)

    2019

  68. [68]

    Julku, T

    A. Julku, T. J. Peltonen, L. Liang, T. T. Heikkil¨ a, and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Superfluid weight and berezinskii- kosterlitz-thouless transition temperature of twisted bi- layer graphene, Phys. Rev. B101, 060505 (2020)

    2020

  69. [69]

    H. Zhai, R. O. Umucal ılar, and M. O. Oktel, Pairing and vortex lattices for interacting fermions in optical lattices with a large magnetic field, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 145301 (2010)

    2010

  70. [70]

    Shaffer, J

    D. Shaffer, J. Wang, and L. H. Santos, Theory of hofstadter superconductors, Phys. Rev. B104, 184501 (2021)

    2021

  71. [71]

    Shaffer, J

    D. Shaffer, J. Wang, and L. H. Santos, Unconventional self-similar hofstadter superconductivity from repulsive interactions, Nature Communications13, 7785 (2022)

    2022

  72. [72]

    Divic, V

    S. Divic, V. Cr´ epel, T. Soejima, X.-Y. Song, A. J. Millis, M. P. Zaletel, and A. Vishwanath, Anyon superconduc- tivity from topological criticality in a hofstadter–hubbard model, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 122, e2426680122 (2025)

    2025

  73. [73]

    F. Chen, W. O. Wang, J.-X. Zhang, L. Balents, and D. N. Sheng, Topological chiral superconductivity in the triangular-lattice hofstadter-hubbard model (2025), arXiv:2509.02757 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2025

  74. [74]

    Kuhlenkamp, S

    C. Kuhlenkamp, S. Divic, M. P. Zaletel, T. Soe- jima, and A. Vishwanath, Robust superconductivity upon doping chiral spin liquid and chern insulators in a hubbard-hofstadter model (2025), arXiv:2509.02675 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2025

  75. [75]

    Guerci, A

    D. Guerci, A. Abouelkomsan, and L. Fu, From fraction- alization to chiral topological superconductivity in a flat chern band, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 186601 (2025)

    2025

  76. [76]

    In the original QGN framework, the operators{ ˆS(I) R } are required to be Hermitian, whereas in the generalized QGN approach adopted here, we relax this Hermiticity condition

  77. [77]

    Z. Han, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, Q. Gao, and E. Khalaf, Exact models of chiral flat-band superconductors (2025), arXiv:2508.21127 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2025

  78. [78]

    Kapit and E

    E. Kapit and E. Mueller, Exact parent hamiltonian for the quantum hall states in a lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 215303 (2010)

    2010

  79. [79]

    X. Shen, G. Ji, J. Zhang, D. E. Palomino, B. Mera, T. Ozawa, and J. Wang, Exact parent hamiltonians for all landau level states in a half-flux lattice (2025), arXiv:2501.09742 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2025

  80. [80]

    J. Wang, J. Cano, A. J. Millis, Z. Liu, and B. Yang, Exact landau level description of geometry and interaction in a flatband, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 246403 (2021)

    2021

Showing first 80 references.