pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.26586 · v1 · pith:QEZ32YRSnew · submitted 2026-06-25 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-th

Unitarity Cuts, t-channel Divergences and the KLN Theorem for Unstable Particles

Marko Beocanin , Michael A. Schmidt This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 04:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-th
keywords KLN theoremt-channel divergencesunitarity cutsunstable particlesinclusive observablesregularization schemes
0
0 comments X

The pith

The KLN theorem cancels t-channel divergences by summing over degenerate processes in models with unstable particles.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper formulates practical prescriptions for applying the KLN theorem to cancel divergences from t-channel exchanges of unstable particles. It studies an illustrative model to address issues such as disconnected diagrams, distributional objects, threshold behavior, and regulator dependence. A sympathetic reader would care because this approach supports construction of finite fixed-order inclusive observables in collider processes. The work demonstrates the cancellations across regularization schemes and connects them to the complex-analytic structure of the amplitudes.

Core claim

In an illustrative model exhibiting a t-channel divergence, the KLN theorem guarantees that summing over all physically-degenerate processes cancels the divergences, yielding finite inclusive observables, with the cancellations holding across several regularization schemes and relating to the complex-analytic structure of the underlying amplitudes.

What carries the argument

The KLN theorem applied within an illustrative model with t-channel divergence, which isolates and resolves the technical obstacles of disconnected diagrams and regulator dependence for inclusive observables.

If this is right

  • Inclusive t-channel collider observables become finite at fixed order once all physically degenerate processes are summed.
  • Cancellations of divergences hold intricately and consistently across multiple regularization schemes.
  • The cancellations relate directly to the complex-analytic structure of the amplitudes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The prescriptions may extend to processes involving multiple species of unstable particles where t-channel singularities arise.
  • The link to analytic structure could guide choices of regulators that preserve the cancellation at higher perturbative orders.

Load-bearing premise

The illustrative model with t-channel divergence captures the essential technical obstacles that appear in realistic collider processes involving unstable particles.

What would settle it

An explicit computation in the model of a summed inclusive t-channel observable that retains a nonzero divergence after all degenerate contributions are included would falsify the cancellation claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.26586 by Marko Beocanin, Michael A. Schmidt.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The cut on the left-hand side can be written as the interference [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: 2.5 The Cutting Rules of ’t Hooft and Veltman With the awareness that disconnected and forward-scattering interferences can contribute to the KLN sum, we can in fact understand the particular result of Eq. (5) as following from an older 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The interference shown in (a) can be written as a cut of an underlying disconnected [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: KLN cuts of the underlying box diagram. The corresponding squared matrix element is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The t-channel cross-section drawn as a cut diagram, where everything to the right of the cut is to be complex-conjugated. The dashed lines in blue are given the mass m0 in the LM and SM regulator schemes. The momentum labels in black correspond to the unconjugated side of the cut, while the momentum label in gray corresponds to the conjugated side. large fictitious mass to only then continue it back to zer… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The forward-scattering cut of the box diagram, to be summed with its complex conjugate. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The 3-body cut of the box diagram, to be summed with its complex conjugate. Every [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The 4-body cut of the box diagram, to be summed with its complex conjugate. Every [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: KLN cuts of the underlying triangle diagram. The complex conjugates of (a) and (b) do [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The cut of the triangle diagram representing interference between the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The forward-scattering cut of the triangle diagram, to be summed with its complex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The triple-emission cut of the triangle diagram. Everything to the right of the cut is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Two possible φ decay channels degenerate with on-shell t-channel scattering. The labels z ∗ , z∗ 0 , z′ on the right hand side of either diagram label the angular cosine of each of the outgoing α particles. All internal lines of (b) are on-shell in the region of degeneracy. For the t-channel process, divergences can only occur when the propagator denominator of Eq. (13) goes on-shell at z ∗ (κ) ≡ 1 − 2 (κ… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Integration contour C in the complex energy domain. The particular deformation around the poles at q0 = ±ωq is the one consistent with causality, which selects out the physical sheet. In order to evaluate this integral via the residue theorem, the contour is closed by a (limitingly) large semicircular arc in the lower/upper half planes, depending on the sign of x0. A Kinematical Identities For reference, … view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: The forward-scattering cut of the box diagram, to be summed with its complex conju [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p050_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Set of 1-trees for the box diagram, with the relevant Feynman parameter (associated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p050_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Set of 2-trees for the box diagram. The product of the relevant Feynman parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p051_16.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Many phenomenological calculations involving massless or unstable particles suffer from divergences as mediating particles go on-shell. One way to deal with these divergences is via the Kinoshita-Lee-Nauenberg (KLN) theorem, which guarantees that by summing over all physically-degenerate processes, the divergences cancel and inclusive observables remain finite. However, actually implementing this theorem in practice requires handling disconnected diagrams, ill-defined distributional objects, threshold behavior and subtle regulator dependence. In this work, we formulate practical prescriptions for dealing with some of these issues by studying the KLN cancellation in an illustrative model exhibiting a t-channel divergence. We demonstrate intricate cancellations across several regularization schemes, connect our results to the complex-analytic structure of the underlying amplitudes, and take steps towards constructing a finite, fixed-order, inclusive t-channel collider observable. This work highlights both the utility of the KLN theorem, and also the technical subtleties and open questions involved with applying it in practice.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper studies the KLN theorem applied to t-channel divergences arising from unstable particles. Using an illustrative model, it formulates prescriptions for handling disconnected diagrams, distributional objects, threshold behavior and regulator dependence; demonstrates explicit cancellations across multiple regularization schemes; connects the cancellations to the complex-analytic structure of the amplitudes; and outlines steps toward a finite fixed-order inclusive t-channel collider observable.

Significance. If the cancellations and prescriptions hold in the chosen model, the work supplies concrete technical guidance for implementing inclusive observables involving unstable particles, a recurring issue in collider phenomenology. The explicit multi-scheme checks and analytic-structure linkage constitute a strength; the manuscript also correctly flags open questions rather than claiming a complete solution.

major comments (1)
  1. The central demonstration is performed in a scalar illustrative model. The skeptic correctly notes that gauge quantum numbers and multi-leg amplitudes introduce additional cut structures and Ward-identity constraints that may alter the cancellation pattern. Because the paper positions the model as capturing the essential obstacles (disconnected diagrams, distributional objects, regulator dependence), a dedicated subsection should compare the analytic structure found here with the corresponding cuts in a gauge-theory example (e.g., a toy electroweak process) to substantiate transferability.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the distributional objects (principal-value prescriptions, delta-function handling) should be introduced once with an explicit equation rather than redefined in each regularization scheme.
  2. The abstract states that 'intricate cancellations' are shown; the corresponding figures or tables should be cross-referenced in the text so the reader can locate the numerical or analytic evidence without searching.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive report and positive assessment of the manuscript's technical contributions. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central demonstration is performed in a scalar illustrative model. The skeptic correctly notes that gauge quantum numbers and multi-leg amplitudes introduce additional cut structures and Ward-identity constraints that may alter the cancellation pattern. Because the paper positions the model as capturing the essential obstacles (disconnected diagrams, distributional objects, regulator dependence), a dedicated subsection should compare the analytic structure found here with the corresponding cuts in a gauge-theory example (e.g., a toy electroweak process) to substantiate transferability.

    Authors: We agree that transferability to gauge theories merits explicit discussion, given the paper's framing of the scalar model. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection (new Section 5.3) that compares the cut structures and distributional features identified in the scalar model with the corresponding structures in a minimal gauge-theory toy model (a simplified electroweak process with unstable vector bosons). The subsection will (i) map the t-channel on-shell cuts, (ii) note how Ward identities constrain the residues but do not remove the KLN cancellation mechanism, and (iii) flag that multi-leg amplitudes introduce additional phase-space regions whose treatment follows the same regulator-independent logic. A complete numerical implementation in the gauge case lies outside the present scope and is noted as future work; the added subsection therefore substantiates the model's role without overclaiming universality. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper performs explicit calculations of unitarity cuts and KLN cancellations within a chosen illustrative model, demonstrating regulator-dependent cancellations and connections to analytic structure through direct amplitude evaluation. No load-bearing step reduces a claimed result to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or self-citation chain; the work is self-contained as a technical study of the model's specific obstacles without renaming known results or importing uniqueness theorems from prior author work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract alone supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the KLN theorem itself is treated as background.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5694 in / 1040 out tokens · 27943 ms · 2026-06-26T04:49:43.455577+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 27 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    R. J. Eden, P. V. Landshoff, D. I. Olive, and J. C. Polkinghorne,The Analytic S-Matrix. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1966

    1966

  2. [2]

    t-channel singularities in cosmology and particle physics,

    B. Grzadkowski, M. Iglicki, and S. Mr´ owczy´ nski, “t-channel singularities in cosmology and particle physics,”Nucl. Phys. B984(2022) 115967,arXiv:2108.01757 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2022

  3. [3]

    Possible Mechanism for the Pion-Nucleon Second Resonance,

    R. F. Peierls, “Possible Mechanism for the Pion-Nucleon Second Resonance,”Phys. Rev. Lett.6(1961) 641–643

    1961

  4. [4]

    Initial particle instability in muon collisions,

    I. F. Ginzburg, “Initial particle instability in muon collisions,”Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 51(1996) 85–89,arXiv:hep-ph/9601272

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  5. [5]

    Relic density computations at NLO: infrared finiteness and thermal correction,

    M. Beneke, F. Dighera, and A. Hryczuk, “Relic density computations at NLO: infrared finiteness and thermal correction,”JHEP10(2014) 045,arXiv:1409.3049 [hep-ph]. [Erratum: JHEP 07, 106 (2016)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  6. [6]

    Dark matter freeze-in from non-equilibrium QFT: towards a consistent treatment of thermal effects,

    M. Becker, E. Copello, J. Harz, and C. Tamarit, “Dark matter freeze-in from non-equilibrium QFT: towards a consistent treatment of thermal effects,”JCAP03(2025) 071,arXiv:2312.17246 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Freeze-in and freeze-out of sterile neutrino dark matter,

    R. Coy and M. A. Schmidt, “Freeze-in and freeze-out of sterile neutrino dark matter,” JCAP08(2022) 070,arXiv:2204.08795 [hep-ph]. [Erratum: JCAP 04, E01 (2023)]

    arXiv 2022

  8. [8]

    Right-Handed Neutrino Production at Finite Temperature: Radiative Corrections, Soft and Collinear Divergences,

    B. Garbrecht, F. Glowna, and M. Herranen, “Right-Handed Neutrino Production at Finite Temperature: Radiative Corrections, Soft and Collinear Divergences,”JHEP04(2013) 099, arXiv:1302.0743 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  9. [9]

    Scattering Rates For Leptogenesis: Damping of Lepton Flavour Coherence and Production of Singlet Neutrinos,

    B. Garbrecht, F. Glowna, and P. Schwaller, “Scattering Rates For Leptogenesis: Damping of Lepton Flavour Coherence and Production of Singlet Neutrinos,”Nucl. Phys. B877(2013) 1–35,arXiv:1303.5498 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  10. [10]

    Asymptotic conditions and infrared divergences in quantum electrodynamics,

    P. P. Kulish and L. D. Faddeev, “Asymptotic conditions and infrared divergences in quantum electrodynamics,”Theor. Math. Phys.4(1970) 745

    1970

  11. [11]

    IR finite S-matrix by gauge invariant dressed states,

    H. Hirai and S. Sugishita, “IR finite S-matrix by gauge invariant dressed states,”JHEP02 (2021) 025,arXiv:2009.11716 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2021

  12. [12]

    On the need for soft dressing,

    D. Carney, L. Chaurette, D. Neuenfeld, and G. Semenoff, “On the need for soft dressing,” JHEP09(2018) 121,arXiv:1803.02370 [hep-th]. 55

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  13. [13]

    IR Finite S Matrix in the QCD Coherent State Basis,

    G. Giavarini and G. Marchesini, “IR Finite S Matrix in the QCD Coherent State Basis,” Nucl. Phys. B296(1988) 546–556

    1988

  14. [14]

    Theory of the asymptotic S matrix for massless particles,

    H. F. Contopanagos and M. B. Einhorn, “Theory of the asymptotic S matrix for massless particles,”Phys. Rev. D45(1992) 1291–1321

    1992

  15. [15]

    Infrared finite amplitudes for massless gauge theories,

    D. A. Forde and A. Signer, “Infrared finite amplitudes for massless gauge theories,”Nucl. Phys. B684(2004) 125–161,arXiv:hep-ph/0311059

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  16. [16]

    FiniteSmatrix,

    H. Hannesdottir and M. D. Schwartz, “FiniteSmatrix,”Phys. Rev. D107no. 2, (2023) L021701,arXiv:1906.03271 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2023

  17. [17]

    Asymptotic charges and coherent states in QCD,

    R. Gonzo, T. Mc Loughlin, D. Medrano, and A. Spiering, “Asymptotic charges and coherent states in QCD,”Phys. Rev. D104no. 2, (2021) 025019,arXiv:1906.11763 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2021

  18. [18]

    Modifying the Dyson series for unstable particles and resonances,

    P. Matak, “Modifying the Dyson series for unstable particles and resonances,”Phys. Rev. D 105no. 7, (2022) 076019,arXiv:2203.01253 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2022

  19. [19]

    e +e− →e −¯νeu ¯dfrom LEP to linear collider energies,

    Y. Kurihara, D. Perret-Gallix, and Y. Shimizu, “e +e− →e −¯νeu ¯dfrom LEP to linear collider energies,”Phys. Lett. B349(1995) 367–374,arXiv:hep-ph/9412215

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  20. [20]

    Stable calculations for unstable particles: Restoring gauge invariance,

    E. N. Argyres, W. Beenakker, G. J. van Oldenborgh, A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, J. Hoogland, R. Kleiss, C. G. Papadopoulos, and G. Passarino, “Stable calculations for unstable particles: Restoring gauge invariance,”Phys. Lett. B358(1995) 339–346,arXiv:hep-ph/9507216

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  21. [21]

    Dyson summation without violating Ward identities and the Goldstone boson equivalence theorem,

    A. Denner and S. Dittmaier, “Dyson summation without violating Ward identities and the Goldstone boson equivalence theorem,”Phys. Rev. D54(1996) 4499–4514, arXiv:hep-ph/9603341

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  22. [22]

    2PI effective action and gauge invariance problems,

    M. E. Carrington, G. Kunstatter, and H. Zaraket, “2PI effective action and gauge invariance problems,”Eur. Phys. J. C42(2005) 253–259,arXiv:hep-ph/0309084

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  23. [23]

    Thermal regularization of t-channel singularities in cosmology and particle physics: the general case,

    M. Iglicki, “Thermal regularization of t-channel singularities in cosmology and particle physics: the general case,”JHEP06(2023) 006,arXiv:2212.00561 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    Colossal quasiparticle radiation in the Lifshitz spin liquid phase of a two-dimensional quantum antiferromagnet,

    M. C. O’Brien and O. P. Sushkov, “Colossal quasiparticle radiation in the Lifshitz spin liquid phase of a two-dimensional quantum antiferromagnet,”Phys. Rev. B101no. 18, (2020) 184408,arXiv:2003.03936 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2020

  25. [25]

    Anomalous thermal broadening from an infrared catastrophe in two-dimensional quantum antiferromagnets,

    M. C. O’Brien and O. P. Sushkov, “Anomalous thermal broadening from an infrared catastrophe in two-dimensional quantum antiferromagnets,”Phys. Rev. B101no. 6, (2020) 064431,arXiv:2001.02339 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2020

  26. [26]

    Evolution of charm-meson ratios in an expanding hadron gas,

    E. Braaten, R. Bruschini, L.-P. He, K. Ingles, and J. Jiang, “Evolution of charm-meson ratios in an expanding hadron gas,”Phys. Rev. D107no. 7, (2023) 076006, arXiv:2209.04972 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    Charm-Mesont-channel Singularities in an Expanding Hadron Gas,

    E. Braaten, R. Bruschini, L.-P. He, K. Ingles, and J. Jiang, “Charm-Mesont-channel Singularities in an Expanding Hadron Gas,”Phys. Rev. D108no. 7, (2023) 076012, arXiv:2307.07470 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    Processes with the T channel singularity in the physical region: Finite beam sizes make cross-sections finite,

    K. Melnikov and V. G. Serbo, “Processes with the T channel singularity in the physical region: Finite beam sizes make cross-sections finite,”Nucl. Phys. B483(1997) 67–82, arXiv:hep-ph/9601290. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 662, 409 (2003)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  29. [29]

    New type of beam size effect and theWboson production at µ+µ− colliders,

    K. Melnikov and V. G. Serbo, “New type of beam size effect and theWboson production at µ+µ− colliders,”Phys. Rev. Lett.76(1996) 3263–3266,arXiv:hep-ph/9601221. 56

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  30. [30]

    Singular cross-sections in muon colliders,

    C. Dams and R. Kleiss, “Singular cross-sections in muon colliders,”Eur. Phys. J. C29 (2003) 11–17,arXiv:hep-ph/0212301

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  31. [31]

    Muon colliders, Monte Carlo and gauge invariance,

    C. Dams and R. Kleiss, “Muon colliders, Monte Carlo and gauge invariance,”Eur. Phys. J. C36(2004) 177–181,arXiv:hep-ph/0309336

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  32. [32]

    Analytic prescription for t-channel singularities,

    K. Asai, N. Hiroshima, J. Sato, R. Sato, and M. J. S. Yang, “Analytic prescription for t-channel singularities,”Phys. Rev. D112no. 7, (2025) 076020,arXiv:2505.10890 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    H. S. Hannesdottir and S. Mizera,What is the iεfor the S-matrix?SpringerBriefs in Physics. Springer, 1, 2023.arXiv:2204.02988 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2023

  34. [34]

    Mass singularities of Feynman amplitudes,

    T. Kinoshita, “Mass singularities of Feynman amplitudes,”J. Math. Phys.3(1962) 650–677

    1962

  35. [35]

    Degenerate Systems and Mass Singularities,

    T. D. Lee and M. Nauenberg, “Degenerate Systems and Mass Singularities,”Phys. Rev.133 (1964) B1549–B1562

    1964

  36. [36]

    Infrared Finiteness and Forward Scattering,

    C. Frye, H. Hannesdottir, N. Paul, M. D. Schwartz, and K. Yan, “Infrared Finiteness and Forward Scattering,”Phys. Rev. D99no. 5, (2019) 056015,arXiv:1810.10022 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  37. [37]

    Collinearity, convergence and cancelling infrared divergences,

    M. Lavelle and D. McMullan, “Collinearity, convergence and cancelling infrared divergences,”JHEP03(2006) 026,arXiv:hep-ph/0511314

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  38. [38]

    Note on the Radiation Field of the electron,

    F. Bloch and A. Nordsieck, “Note on the Radiation Field of the electron,”Phys. Rev.52 (1937) 54–59

    1937

  39. [39]

    Principal Landau determinants,

    C. Fevola, S. Mizera, and S. Telen, “Principal Landau determinants,”Comput. Phys. Commun.303(2024) 109278,arXiv:2311.16219 [math-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    J. C. Collins,Renormalization : An Introduction to Renormalization, the Renormalization Group and the Operator-Product Expansion, vol. 26 ofCambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984

    1984

  41. [41]

    Tod, or not tod: recent developments and comparisons of regularization schemes,

    C. Gnendigeret al., “Tod, or not tod: recent developments and comparisons of regularization schemes,”Eur. Phys. J. C77no. 7, (2017) 471,arXiv:1705.01827 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  42. [42]

    Aspects of perturbative unitarity,

    D. Anselmi, “Aspects of perturbative unitarity,”Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 025028, arXiv:1606.06348 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  43. [43]

    Augmenting the residue theorem with boundary terms in finite-density calculations,

    T. Gorda, J. ¨Osterman, and S. S¨ appi, “Augmenting the residue theorem with boundary terms in finite-density calculations,”Phys. Rev. D106no. 10, (2022) 105026, arXiv:2208.14479 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2022

  44. [44]

    Cutting-edge tools for cutting edges,

    R. Britto, C. Duhr, H. S. Hannesdottir, and S. Mizera, “Cutting-edge tools for cutting edges,” inEncyclopedia of Mathematical Physics (Second Edition), R. Szabo and M. Bojowald, eds., pp. 595–620. Academic Press, Oxford, second edition ed., 2025. arXiv:2402.19415 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    On the formulation of quantized field theories,

    H. Lehmann, K. Symanzik, and W. Zimmermann, “On the formulation of quantized field theories,”Nuovo Cim.1(1955) 205–225

    1955

  46. [46]

    A new approach to the LSZ reduction formula,

    J. Collins, “A new approach to the LSZ reduction formula,”arXiv:1904.10923 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1904

  47. [47]

    Weinberg,The Quantum Theory of Fields

    S. Weinberg,The Quantum Theory of Fields. Vol. 1: Foundations. Cambridge University Press, 6, 2005

    2005

  48. [48]

    DIAGRAMMAR,

    G. ’t Hooft and M. J. G. Veltman, “DIAGRAMMAR,”NATO Sci. Ser. B4(1974) 177–322. 57

    1974

  49. [49]

    M. J. G. Veltman,Diagrammatica: The Path to Feynman Rules, vol. 4. Cambridge University Press, 5, 2012

    2012

  50. [50]

    Singularities and discontinuities of Feynman amplitudes,

    R. E. Cutkosky, “Singularities and discontinuities of Feynman amplitudes,”J. Math. Phys. 1(1960) 429–433

    1960

  51. [51]

    M. D. Schwartz,Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model. Cambridge University Press, 3, 2014

    2014

  52. [52]

    Sequential Discontinuities of Feynman Integrals and the Monodromy Group,

    J. L. Bourjaily, H. Hannesdottir, A. J. McLeod, M. D. Schwartz, and C. Vergu, “Sequential Discontinuities of Feynman Integrals and the Monodromy Group,”JHEP01(2021) 205, arXiv:2007.13747 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2021

  53. [53]

    Cuts from residues: the one-loop case,

    S. Abreu, R. Britto, C. Duhr, and E. Gardi, “Cuts from residues: the one-loop case,”JHEP 06(2017) 114,arXiv:1702.03163 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  54. [54]

    Unitarity and causality in a renormalizable field theory with unstable particles,

    M. J. G. Veltman, “Unitarity and causality in a renormalizable field theory with unstable particles,”Physica29(1963) 186–207

    1963

  55. [55]

    Tracking discontinuities in parameter space,

    R. Britto and H. S. Hannesdottir, “Tracking discontinuities in parameter space,”JHEP02 (2026) 094,arXiv:2510.14087 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    Positive integrands from Feynman integrals in the Minkowski regime,

    S. Jones, A. Olsson, and T. Stone, “Positive integrands from Feynman integrals in the Minkowski regime,”JHEP10(2025) 068,arXiv:2506.24073 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    External leg corrections as an origin of large logarithms,

    H. Bahl, J. Braathen, and G. Weiglein, “External leg corrections as an origin of large logarithms,”JHEP02(2022) 159,arXiv:2112.11419 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2022

  58. [58]

    Predictions for all processese +e− → 4 fermions +γ,

    A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, M. Roth, and D. Wackeroth, “Predictions for all processese +e− → 4 fermions +γ,”Nucl. Phys. B560(1999) 33–65,arXiv:hep-ph/9904472

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  59. [59]

    Electroweak corrections to charged-currente +e− →4 fermion processes: Technical details and further results,

    A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, M. Roth, and L. H. Wieders, “Electroweak corrections to charged-currente +e− →4 fermion processes: Technical details and further results,”Nucl. Phys. B724(2005) 247–294,arXiv:hep-ph/0505042. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 854, 504–507 (2012)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  60. [60]

    Scattering of very light charged particles,

    J. C. Taylor, “Scattering of very light charged particles,”Phys. Rev. D54(1996) 2975–2977, arXiv:hep-ph/9306234

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  61. [61]

    Reply to ’Scattering of very light charged particles’,

    H. F. Contopanagos and M. B. Einhorn, “Reply to ’Scattering of very light charged particles’,”Phys. Rev. D54(1996) 2978–2979

    1996

  62. [62]

    Thermal axion production at hard and soft momenta,

    K. Bouzoud and J. Ghiglieri, “Thermal axion production at hard and soft momenta,”JHEP 01(2025) 163,arXiv:2404.06113 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    ALP production from abelian gauge bosons: beyond hard thermal loops,

    M. Becker, J. Harz, E. Morgante, C. Puchades-Ib´ a˜ nez, and P. Schwaller, “ALP production from abelian gauge bosons: beyond hard thermal loops,”JHEP06(2025) 160, arXiv:2502.01729 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  64. [64]

    Taming forward scattering singularities in partial waves,

    M. Fuentes Zamoro, B. Grinstein, and P. Qu´ ılez, “Taming forward scattering singularities in partial waves,”arXiv:2510.08784 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  65. [65]

    From multiple unitarity cuts to the coproduct of Feynman integrals,

    S. Abreu, R. Britto, C. Duhr, and E. Gardi, “From multiple unitarity cuts to the coproduct of Feynman integrals,”JHEP10(2014) 125,arXiv:1401.3546 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  66. [66]

    Charged Particle Decay at Finite Temperature,

    A. Czarnecki, M. Kamionkowski, S. K. Lee, and K. Melnikov, “Charged Particle Decay at Finite Temperature,”Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 025018,arXiv:1110.2171 [hep-ph]. 58

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  67. [67]

    Electron - Positron Annihilation in Thermal QCD,

    Y. Gabellini, T. Grandou, and D. Poizat, “Electron - Positron Annihilation in Thermal QCD,”Annals Phys.202(1990) 436–466

    1990

  68. [68]

    Cancellation of infrared and collinear singularities in relativistic thermal field theories,

    T. Grandou, M. Le Bellac, and D. Poizat, “Cancellation of infrared and collinear singularities in relativistic thermal field theories,”Nucl. Phys. B358(1991) 408–432

    1991

  69. [69]

    Finite Temperature Radiative Corrections to Early Universe Neutron - Proton Ratio: Cancellation of Infrared and Mass Singularities,

    R. Baier, E. Pilon, B. Pire, and D. Schiff, “Finite Temperature Radiative Corrections to Early Universe Neutron - Proton Ratio: Cancellation of Infrared and Mass Singularities,” Nucl. Phys. B336(1990) 157–183

    1990

  70. [70]

    On Infrared and Mass Singularities of Perturbative QCD in a Quark - Gluon Plasma,

    T. Altherr, P. Aurenche, and T. Becherrawy, “On Infrared and Mass Singularities of Perturbative QCD in a Quark - Gluon Plasma,”Nucl. Phys. B315(1989) 436–464

    1989

  71. [71]

    R. S. Strichartz,A Guide to Distribution Theory and Fourier Transforms. WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2003

    2003

  72. [72]

    Weinzierl,Feynman Integrals

    S. Weinzierl,Feynman Integrals. A Comprehensive Treatment for Students and Researchers. UNITEXT for Physics. Springer, 2022.arXiv:2201.03593 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2022

  73. [73]

    Feynman graph polynomials,

    C. Bogner and S. Weinzierl, “Feynman graph polynomials,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A25(2010) 2585–2618,arXiv:1002.3458 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  74. [74]

    Cheng and T

    H. Cheng and T. T. Wu,Expanding Protons: Scattering at High Energies. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1987

    1987

  75. [75]

    External leg corrections in the unitarity method,

    R. Britto and E. Mirabella, “External leg corrections in the unitarity method,”JHEP01 (2012) 045,arXiv:1109.5106 [hep-ph]. 59

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012